This application is a National Phase Patent Application and claims the priority of International application No. PCT/CH2008/000474, filed on Nov. 10, 2008, which claims priority of Swiss Patent Application Number 1825/07, filed on Nov. 26, 2007 and Swiss Patent Application Number 2010/07, filed on Dec. 27, 2007.
The invention relates to a bone nail for the heel according to the preamble of claim 1, and to an osteosynthesis-kit according to the preamble of claim 16, and to an application of the bone nail to tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis according to claim 17.
Marrow nails which reveal a curvature in a portion thereof have been known for a long time. As an example so-called ENDER-nails may be cited in this regard. However, these known nails are formed elastically and flexibly due to their purpose of application, such that these nails already bend upon small loads. Due to the flexibility of these known nails it is even unimportant that the intermediate part is rectilinear and comprises no curvature. These known ENDER-nails further stand out due to their relative length and tenuity. The ratio between the diameter of the nail and the length of the nail lies in the case of ENDER in the range from 1:60 to 1:110. An application in the field of heels is ruled out for these reasons.
Further, tibia-nails are known which are partially curved, however, the radii of curvature of these known nails are comparatively small, namely in the range of 100 and 120 mm, such that these nails do not come into consideration for an application in the field of heels.
Herein, the invention tries to find a remedy. An object underlies the invention to provide a bone nail for the heel, which due to its shape and material properties can be inserted through the calcaneus and talus up into the marrow space of the tibia. In medical terms it is dealt with so-called tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis, which is sometimes also called “double anthrodesis”.
The invention solves the object by a bone nail, which comprise the features according to claim 1, by an osteosynthesis-kit, which comprises the features of claim 16, and by a method of use of the bone nail according to claim 17.
The substantial advantages, which may be achieved by the bone nail according to the invention and by the surgical technique that becomes possible thereby, are as follows:
Due to the bone nail according to the invention there can now even be treated novel indications, such as for example the treatment of:
In a specific embodiment the bone nail has a radius of curvature of 240 mm at maximum, preferably 210 mm at maximum. Typically the radius of curvature amounts to about 190 mm.
Purposefully, the radius of curvature does not vary along the entire length of the bone nail by more than 1% and is preferably constant. Alternatively, the radius of curvature may, however, also increase preferably steadily in the front part in a direction towards the tip of the bone nail.
In a specific embodiment the bone nail is formed stiffly over its entire length. This arrangement is most appropriate for the embodiment as a milling cutter guiding mandrel.
In another embodiment the front part is formed less stiffly than the rear part and preferably is plastically deformable. This arrangement is most appropriate for the embodiment as an implant.
In the front part of the bone nail longitudinal channels may be provided, such that the front part includes a cross-section being smaller than the rear part. Due to the weakening of the cross-section, a flexibilization of the front part is achieved as opposed to the stiff rear part, a fact which offers advantages with regard to the embodiment as an implant. The marrow nail may be formed with tubular shape also in its tip half, preferably having a wall thickness of 0.5 mm.
The front part purposefully includes not more than 50% of the stiffness of the rear part.
The front part as well as the rear part of the bone nail can make up between 30 and 70% of the entire length of the bone nail.
In one embodiment the bone nail is formed as an implant having a diameter DI ranging from 9 to 13 mm. In another embodiment the bone nail is formed as a milling cutter guiding mandrel having a diameter DD in the range from 3 to 7 mm.
The bone nail is preferably flexurally rigid and may for example be formed from hardened steel. The bending stiffness B is according to Wikipedia calculated according to the formula: B=E×I , wherein I is the 2nd order moment of area in mm4, and E is the E-module in N/mm2. I depends on the bending axis chosen; however, in case of rotational symmetric cross-sectional surfaces I plays no role.
The radius R of curvature of the bone nail lies purposefully in the range from 140 to 240 mm, preferably from 150 to 210 mm. These ranges for the radius of curvature allow for an optimal placement of the bone bore via the milling cutter guiding mandrel and—after completion of the milling process—an optimal insertion of the implant into the three respective bones: calcaneus, talus and tibia. Advantageously, the radius R of curvature is constant over the entire length of the bone nail. Since the bone nail—in its arrangement as a milling cutter guiding mandrel as well as an implant—is stiff and may thus not be bent, the constant curvature is advantageous, in order to be able to drive the bone nail into the respective bone with least possible efforts.
The bone nail is appropriately curved over its entire length, most preferably in a steady manner. This arrangement leads to an easiest possible insertion of the bone nail: a bone nail having a rectilinear section (besides curved sections) would impede the insertion due to an abutment of the bone nail at the wall of the bore.
In a particular embodiment the bone nail formed as an implant includes a length LI less than 160 mm, preferably less than 150 mm. With this length the implant reaches up to a region of the tibia, where due to the width of the marrow channel some amount of balancing may take place; at a larger nail length the tip of the bone nail would arrive in a narrower region of the Tibia marrow channel, which would impede further insertion. The length LI is, however purposefully larger than 125 mm, preferably larger than 130 mm.
In a specific embodiment the bone nail formed as an implant extends over a circular arc ranging from 38° to 70°, preferably from 48° to 55°.
In another embodiment the bone nail formed as a milling cutter guiding mandrel includes a length LD in the range from 200 to 260 mm.
The bone nail formed as an implant purposefully has a ratio LI/DI between its length LI and its diameter DI, which is less than 16, preferably less than 14. The bone nail formed as a milling cutter guiding mandrel purposefully has a ratio LD/DD between its length LD and its diameter DD in the range from 30 to 90.
In a particular embodiment the bone nail has at least one transverse bore for receiving a locking screw, wherein the length axis of the transverse bore preferably lies within the plane of curvature of the bone nail. The transverse bore may, for example, lie in the head region of the bone nail, and its longitudinal axis may include an angle α with the longitudinal axis of the bone nail of preferably 10° to 20°.
In a particular embodiment the bone nail formed as a milling cutter guiding mandrel comprises a sharp tip, preferably in the shape of a tip of a chisel. The tip of the chisel is preferably chamfered only on one side, preferably on the outside of the curvature of the bone nail.
In a further embodiment the radius of curvature of the bone nail or of the bone nail formed as the milling cutter guiding mandrel amounts to at least 190 mm, preferably at least 200 mm.
In another embodiment the bone nail comprises at least in its front part a longitudinal slit.
In a further embodiment the bone nail comprises at least in its front part a shamrock-shaped cross-section.
In still another embodiment the rear part of the bone nail is formed stiffly.
In another embodiment the bone nail comprises an intermediate part between the front part and the rear part, wherein the stiffness of the intermediate part increases towards the rear part.
In another embodiment the bone nail comprises at least in its front part a cavity which is parallel to the longitudinal axis.
At least one bone nail formed as an implant in conjunction with at least one bone nail formed as a milling cutter guiding mandrel can be combined to an osteosynthesis-kit, wherein the radii of curvature of the implant and of the milling cutter guiding mandrel must be of the same size. The length LD of the milling cutter guiding mandrel in such a kit is preferably 80 to 120 mm, preferably 90 to 110 mm longer than the length LI of the implant.
The invention and further aspects of the invention will be explained in more detail in what follows using the partly schematical illustrations of multiple embodiments.
It is shown in:
In
The implant 8 includes a number of transverse bores 9, 10, 11, 12, into which locking screws 30 can be inserted. Three of the transverse bores 9, 11, 12 lie in the same plane within which the implant 8 is curved. A fourth transverse bore 12 lies at a proximal end of the implant 8 and extends orthogonally to the mentioned curvature plane.
The longitudinal axis 13 of the transverse bore 9 positioned at the distal end of the implant 8 includes an angle α of 15° with the longitudinal axis 14 of the implant 8.
The implant 8 is composed of a stiff material—in particular with regard to bending—and is for example composed of one of the known implant steels, which are preferably hardened, in order to further increase the bending stiffness of the implant 8.
In order to be able to insert the implant 8 into the bone, it is preferable—depending on the bone quality—to drill up the respective bones 1, 2, 3 in advance. This is carried out using the bone nail illustrated in
The milling cutter guiding mandrel 20 includes a sharply formed tip 17 in the form of a chisel tip 21, in order that it can be easily driven into the calcaneus 1. The chisel tip 21 is chamfered only on one side, namely on the outer side of the curvature of the milling cutter guiding mandrel 20.
In
In
a) comprises in its front part 15 a shamrock-shaped cross-section 22 (
b) comprises an intermediate part 25 between its front part 15 and its rear part 16, the intermediate part 25 being formed as a transitional region between the front part 15 with low stiffness and the rear part 16 with high stiffness, such that the stiffness of the bone nail increases towards the rear part 16 continuously.
Due to the cavity 26 the bone nail obtains in the front part 15 a thin-walled cross-section 22 including a peripheral wall 28 having a small wall thickness, the wall 28 further being separated by the longitudinal slit 19 which is parallel to the longitudinal axis 14. The shamrock-shape in the cross-section 22 results from the wall 28 being formed with two indentations 29 extending in the front part 15 parallel to the longitudinal axis 14. The two indentations 29 are arranged on the periphery of the bone nail, such that a convex bend 27 of the wall 28 is formed diametrally opposing the longitudinal slit 19 and extending likewise parallel to the longitudinal axis. In the intermediate part 25 the stiffness of the front part 15 increases towards the rear part 16 due to a growing wall thickness of the wall 28 towards the rear part 16. This growing wall thickness is achieved on the one side by a continuous narrowing of the cavity 26 and on the other side by a continuous decrease of the radially measured depth of the indentations 29 in the wall 28 towards the rear part 16, such that a continuous transition from the shamrock-shaped cross-section 22 in the front part 15 is formed towards the circular cross-section 24 in the rear part 16. Prior to the implantation, the intermediate part 25 and the front part 15 have a curved shape (illustrated as dashed) including the same radius r of curvature as the rear part 16. Due to the reduced stiffness of the intermediate part 25 and in particular of the front part 15 these may deform during the insertion into the tibia 3, such that the front part 15 may comprise a substantially larger radius of curvature after the implantation or may even have a rectilinear form.
In the following the general surgical method is defined:
In the following a more detailed surgical technique for the bone nail formed as an implant 8 is described:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1825/07 | Nov 2007 | CH | national |
2010/07 | Dec 2007 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2008/000474 | 11/10/2008 | WO | 00 | 7/26/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/067831 | 6/4/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1630239 | Binkley et al. | May 1927 | A |
4541423 | Barber | Sep 1985 | A |
4877019 | Vives | Oct 1989 | A |
5035697 | Frigg | Jul 1991 | A |
5041115 | Frigg et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053035 | McLaren | Oct 1991 | A |
5312406 | Brumfield | May 1994 | A |
5531748 | de la Caffiniere | Jul 1996 | A |
5624447 | Myers | Apr 1997 | A |
5735899 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5855579 | James et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871486 | Huebner et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5968048 | Harder | Oct 1999 | A |
6074392 | Durham | Jun 2000 | A |
6102914 | Bulstra et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6461360 | Adam | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6579293 | Chandran | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629976 | Gnos et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6702816 | Buhler | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709436 | Hover et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7963967 | Woods | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8066706 | Schlienger et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20040049192 | Shimizu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050267481 | Carl et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277936 | Siravo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060129153 | Klaue et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060200141 | Janna et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241605 | Schlienger et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070225721 | Thelen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070276385 | Schlienger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288017 | Kaup | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080140078 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262496 | Schlienger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100292722 | Klaue | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305623 | Klaue | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110087228 | Ferrante et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120143192 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 608 286 | Nov 2006 | CA |
WO 2007053960 | May 2007 | CH |
133162 | Oct 1901 | DE |
76 07 981 | Nov 1977 | DE |
2005-504573 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-507726 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-510445 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2011-505180 | Feb 2011 | JP |
WO 9012550 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 9012550 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 03017822 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03017822 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03028533 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03039330 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004056285 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004089255 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2006119659 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119659 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007053960 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007053960 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007053960 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007120539 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007120539 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008099176 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009067831 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued Sep. 2, 2010 for Application No. PCT/IB2010/001089, 15 sheets. |
International Search Report, dated Jan. 8, 2009, corresponding to PCT/CH2008/000474, 8 pages. |
Final Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,168, dated Jan. 22, 2013, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,778, dated Jul. 14, 2014, 13 pages. |
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,778, dated May 1, 2015, 22 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,168, dated Apr. 27, 2012, 11 pages. |
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,168, dated Jan. 22, 2013, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,168, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 21 pages. |
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,168, dated May 4, 2015, 23 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/080,778, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 26 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100305623 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |