Patent Grant
9655665
The invention relates to bone plate systems and, more particularly, to a bone plate system that allows for motion of the bone anchors relative to the bone plate member.
There are presently many different types of plate and fixture systems for securing two or more bones or bone fragments in relative position so that the bones may fuse or heal, or so that tissue adjacent the bones may heal without disruption from the movement of the secured bones. As used herein, the term bone may refer to a bone, or a bone fragment or portion, and the term may refer to a portion of a bone that is covered with another material, such as the endplates covering the top and bottom surface of a vertebra. Also as used herein, the term fusion refers to the joining of materials, such as bone or graft material, and the fusion site is the entire region in which fusion may be desired. These systems have been used to secure spinal vertebrae such as cervical vertebrae.
Bone plate systems are typically used to assist or direct spinal fusion or vertebral healing procedures. These procedures promote earlier post-operative patient mobility and improve success in correcting spinal deformities while decreasing the need for post-operative collars and the incidence of graft dislodgement if a graft is used.
Furthermore, these systems have been found to assist in controlling and/or exerting a compressive loading force applied to the surgical site. By applying a compressive load, it has been found that bone heals more optimally and with greater integrity, a principle known as Wolff's Law.
Some prior bone plate systems seek to provide a compressive force while allowing the vertebrae to settle naturally under the force of gravity by offering bone anchors such as screws or alternatively coupling members that couple the screw heads to the bone plates that can pivot with respect to the plate as the vertebrae shift, settle, and/or curvature of the spine is altered. Many previous bone plate systems do not even allow such motion, and many that do provide inadequate control over the manner in which the vertebrae settle under compression. Additionally, if this shifting or settling of vertebrae is improperly or inadequately accounted for, additional stress may be added to the vertebrae and an undesirable load path through the spine may be created, hindering the recovery, grafting, and/or fusion process.
Another manner for permitting compressive loads between joined bones is to utilize a dynamic plate having at least one elongated screw aperture that allows settling of the vertebrae by gravity by allowing at least one secured bone and its associated bone anchor to move relative to the plate. However, heretofore known arrangements of standard and dynamized apertures in such plates provide less than optimal capacity for controlling the movement and/or compression between more than two tiers of secured vertebrae and/or many previously known bone plates did not provide sufficient movement to allow the spine to settle naturally as a portion of the spine is compressed during the recovery period. Inasmuch as these prior bone plate systems allowed for some settling of the spine, this settling would cause the spine to be inclined to exhibit an altered degree of curvature, which prior dynamic bone plate systems failed to accommodate. If the spine is not allowed to adapt to this different degree of curvature and thus reach a more stable configuration, an undesirable or improper load path through the spine may be created, hindering the recovery, grafting, and/or fusion process.
Another shortcoming of many bone plate systems is the backing out or loosening of the bone anchors, which are often bone screws. If the bone anchors loosen and/or back out, the bones are not properly secured and may be allowed to move relative to one another in an uncontrolled manner. This may compromise the ability to achieve optimal bone fusion and bone alignment, and it may lead to loss of graft material and damage or loss of bone. Furthermore, when the plate is a dynamic or dynamized plate, such that at least some bone anchors may be permitted to move relative to the plate, these issues may be further compounded or exacerbated by a bone anchor backing out. Additionally, in the case of anterior cervical plates, a bone anchor backing out could hinder swallowing and cause irritation or even a puncture wound to the esophagus, which may lead to infection or even death.
Some known bone plate systems offer resilient base members such as c-clips which house at least a portion of the head of the bone anchor. Often, the base member will be compressed upon entering a throughbore and allowed to expand at least partially to its original shape. These resilient base members, however, have clear drawbacks. First, under certain conditions, many resilient base members may be recompressed and pushed out of the throughbore, which may allow the base member and/or bone anchor to loosen and back out of the bone plate. Furthermore, resilient base members often expand only partially to their original configuration, thus imposing stress to the inner walls of the throughbore, causing increased friction and thus hindering the bone anchor from accommodating spinal shifts, compression, and/or changes in curvature.
Accordingly, there is a need for improved bone plates, bone plate systems, mechanisms to inhibit bone anchor back-out, and improved tools and methods for utilizing bone plate systems.
In accordance with the present invention, several embodiments of bone plate systems as well as tools and methods for installing the same are provided. The present bone plate systems overcome shortcomings of prior bone plate systems and generally allow motion for the bone anchors such that they may move relative to the bone plates to accommodate shifting or settling of secured vertebrae while offering desirable levels of control and predictability of this motion. Furthermore, one exemplary embodiment featuring aspects according to the present invention represents a new and novel approach to combining a narrow bone plate profile with enhanced torsional stability.
In one form of the present invention, a bone plate system is provided having an elongate plate member and a plurality of throughbores of the plate member. A pivot base is received in one of the throughbores with the pivot base having an opening configured to seat the head end of a bone anchor that may be driven into spinal bone. The base member and throughbores have cooperating surfaces allowing the pivot base and corresponding bone anchor member to freely shift or pivot within the throughbore relative to the plate member. In this way, the pivot base can exhibit well-controlled pivoting motion relative to the plate to allow the spine to settle to a desirable configuration and accommodate shifts in spinal curvature as well as form a stable and favorable load path through the spine.
In another form of the present invention, a bone plate system is provided having an elongate plate member extending along an axis thereof and a plurality of throughbores of the plate member. The throughbores are configured to receive a base member which has a bone anchor member driven therethrough, the head end of the bone anchor member able to be seated within an opening in the base member. The base member has a substantially rigid body, and seating the head end of the bone anchor therein does not deform the body of the base member. The rigid base portion and the throughbore of the bone plate member are configured to allow controlled motion of the base member and associated bone anchor member relative to the plate member even after the bone anchor member has been driven into bone and the head end of the bone anchor member has been seated within the opening of the base member. In this way, rigid base members are provided that exhibit controlled motion relative to the plate to accommodate spinal shifting and/or changes in spinal curvature.
In one form of the present invention, a bone plate system is provided having an elongate plate member with a plurality of throughbores extending therethrough. Each throughbore is configured to receive a retainer base member, each retainer base member having an opening to receive a bone anchor member having a head end which is seated within the opening of the base member. The base member opening has a retention portion sized to keep the one bone anchor member head end seated within the opening and keep the bone anchor member from backing out therefrom. Additionally, the base member opening has cooperating surfaces of the base member and the throughbore of the plate member allow for pivoting and, optionally, translation of the base member and bone anchor member relative to the plate member even with the bone anchor member driven into bone and the head end of the bone anchor member seated in the opening of the retainer base member. Thus, settling of the vertebrae and changes in spinal curvature may be accounted for, which is desirable because if pivoting alone may not account for the expected settling of a patient's vertebrae, a harmful load path may be created through the spine, hindering the recovery, grafting, and/or fusion process.
In another form of the present invention, a bone plate system is provided having an elongate bone plate member with a plurality of throughbores of the plate member. At least one of the throughbores has at least one access slot in communication therewith whereby a base member may be inserted into the throughbore. The base member is inserted into the throughbore through the access slots in an insertion orientation and is then shifted to a seated orientation within the one throughbore.
In one form, the base member has at least one pivot or projecting member extending from the base member into access cavities defining confronting extending surfaces that extend from the main throughbore portion to keep the base member and corresponding bone anchor member from turning in the throughbore due to torque applied to the base member via the seated head of the bone anchor member. In this way, the opposing walls of the confronting surfaces of the access slot or cavity may contact the extended portions of the base member and guide pivotal motion thereof while enhancing the overall torsional stability of the bone plate system, allowing the plate member to have a narrow or monoplate configuration in some embodiments of the present invention while maintaining desirable mechanical properties. Bone plate systems with more narrow profiles tend to cause less irritation or harm to the surrounding soft tissues, and, in the case of anterior cervical plates for example, a narrow plate member profile may result in less encroachment and/or irritation to the esophagus.
In one form of the present invention, bone plate systems are provided, the systems having a bone plate with at least one throughbore therein. In a preferred form, the plate features one throughbore per level or tier, each throughbore being configured to receive a pivot base therein. Cavities or grooves extending from the main throughbore portions and extended members of the pivot bases feature opposing sides and as a result the throughbores and pivot bases allow pivoting of the pivot bases while providing enhanced torsional stability to the bone plate systems and inhibiting rotation with respect to only one primary axis while allowing rotation with respect to the other two primary axes.
In another form, a method is provided whereby a base member is seated within a bone plate, the base member being aligned with access slots of a throughbore, inserted into the access slots in an insertion orientation, and then rotated into a seated orientation within the throughbore.
In one form, a method is provided whereby a bone plate is secured to bone, the method comprising compressing a resilient head portion of a bone anchor member with an insertion tool engaged therewith, driving the bone anchor member into bone, seated the compressed head portion within a base member opening, and releasing the insertion tool from the resilient head portion of the bone anchor member so that the bone anchor member is retained within the opening and kept from backing out of the base member.
In some forms, the bone plate is an anterior cervical plate, and during installation of the bone plate system, the plate is placed over a plurality of cervical vertebrae with each tier and corresponding throughbores in the bone plate aligned to a corresponding individual vertebra, forming two rows of throughbores. Two bone anchors per tier are driven into a corresponding vertebra, with the head end of each bone anchor being seated in the opening defined by each pivot base such that the bone anchor and pivot base pivot and, in the case of a dynamized throughbore, translate as one relative to the plate with the pivot base and bone anchor are fixed relative to one another.
Additionally, in some forms, the bone plate is an anterior cervical plate, and during installation of the bone plate system, the plate is placed over a plurality of cervical vertebrae with each tier and corresponding throughbore in the bone plate aligned to a corresponding individual vertebra, forming a single row of throughbores. One bone anchor per tier is driven into a corresponding vertebra, with the head end of each bone anchor being seated in the opening defined by each pivot base such that the bone anchor and pivot base pivot as one relative to the plate with the pivot base and bone anchor fixed relative to one another.
In one form, the extended members from pivot bases offer the bone plate system enhanced torsional and rotational stability, meaning that the pivot base and adjoined extended members add to the overall torsional resistance of the bone plate system and aid in rotating or twisting of the coupled vertebrae relative to one another in a manner that may hinder the recovery process by, for example, damaging a graft site or weakened vertebra. In addition, the monoplate or narrow-profile embodiments of the bone plate may cause less irritation to the esophagus and other soft tissues while allowing the bone plate system to be installed with a smaller incision than is necessary for bone plates with wider profiles. Furthermore, using only one bone anchor per tier may allow a shortened installation time, a bone plate system that is easier and less costly to manufacture, and cause less degradation to the structural integrity of the vertebrae.
In another form, the geometric configuration between the bone plate and the pivot bases provides clearances that accommodate the pivoting motion of the pivot bases relative to the plate. In a preferred form, this pivoting motion has a predetermined defined range. Due to the clearances, the geometric configurations, and the generally spherical profiles of the pivot bases and the internal surfaces of the throughbores in the bone plate, the pivot bases without extended member are generally free to pivot and/or rotate about any axis and the pivot bases with extended members are generally free to pivot fore and aft and side to side relative to the longitudinal axis of the plate while being inhibited from rotating with respect to the central axis of the throughbore of the plate member. The freedom to pivot allows the bone plate system to accommodate at least a portion of the settling of the coupled vertebrae during the recovery period, as well as adapt to changes in spinal curvature. Generally, in the case of a three-tiered bone plate, the uppermost and lowermost bone screws will be installed at diverging angles with respect to one another, and as the vertebrae settle, these angles tend to relax.
In one form, the geometric configuration between the bone plate and the pivot bases features elongated or dynamized throughbores wherein the pivoting relationship is the same as described above, but the elongation of at least one throughbore provides the pivot base received therein with the ability to translate as well as pivot relative to the bone plate. Generally, at least one throughbore is a standard or non-dynamized throughbore, and the pivot bases disposed within dynamized or elongated throughbores are generally moved as far away from the standard throughbore as possible before the bone anchors are inserted. A dynamic bone plate may be used when a surgeon or specialist believes that the vertebrae to be secured to the plate member may experience more settling or shifting than pivoting alone could account for. In this case, the compressive forces and shifting of the vertebrae cause the dynamized throughbores to allow the pivot bases disposed therein to demonstrate controlled translational motion toward the standard throughbore as well as a predetermined range of angular motion, both working to accommodate settling of the vertebrae and possible changes in curvature. This combination may allow the spine more freedom to settle to a more stable configuration, which may lead to a more desirable load path through the spine and better promote the recovery, grafting, and or/fusion process.
In another form according to other aspects of the present invention, a surgical instrument for driving a bone anchor is provided. The surgical instrument comprises a bone anchor engagement portion, a compression shaft, and a lever for actuating the compression shaft. Actuation of the compression shaft can move the compression shaft relative to an engaged bone anchor member, effecting compression and uncompression of a resilient head portion of the bone anchor member.
Generally speaking, pursuant to these various embodiments, bone plate systems are disclosed herein for securing a plurality of bones 7 in a desired orientation and arrangement. In some forms, the bone plate system utilizes a dynamized plate with dynamic throughbores so that bones 7 may compress and shift toward each other, such as with dynamic or dynamized bone plate systems 410, 510 shown in
Referring to
In each of these examples, the bone plate system 10 is used to secure the bones 7 (and any prosthetic or graft) in a desired spatial relationship. Typically, the desired spatial relationship between the bones 7 (vertebrae) is generally vertical, such as the vertebrae 7 would be in a normal, healthy spine when the person is standing. As discussed above with respect to Wolff's Law, compression or loading of bones promotes healing of the bones or bone fragments and improves the integrity of the fusion therebetween. Particular to some bones in the human anatomy, such as a femur, the weight of the person, due to gravity, compresses those bones. For spines, the fusion of adjacent vertebrae can similarly benefit from using gravity to compress the adjacent vertebrae 7.
Accordingly, though the bones 7 are secured in a desired spatial relationship, the present bone plate system 10 preferably allows the bones 7 to undergo a certain degree of shifting relative to each other. In other words, to capitalize on the compression imparted to the adjacent vertebrae 7 by gravity, the bone plate system 10 is configured to allow the bones 7 to compress in a manner dictated by the bone plate system 10. In the present system 10, this shifting is preferably accommodated by pivotal motion of pivot members such as pivot bases 50.
The bone plate system 10 generally includes a bone plate member 20 secured to the bones 7 with bone anchors that are, in a preferred form, bone screws 70. The plate member 20 includes throughbores 22 formed therein with a generally spherical pivot base 50 secured within each throughbore 22. The bone screws 70 have a head portion 72 that may be secured within an opening 52 of the pivot base 50 by an retention mechanism that is inherent to the bone plate system 10 based on the configuration of the head portion 72 and the pivot base 50.
The bone plate 20 may be provided with curvature in the longitudinal direction that contours the plate member 20 to the average natural curvature of the spine 6, as well as to reduce interference with surrounding tissues. The plate 20 may be pre-bent to have a curvature in a longitudinal direction, preferably with a radius of curvature of approximately 200 millimeters, and in a lateral direction, preferably with a radius of curvature of approximately 20 millimeters. It is often desirable to alter the standard shape of the plate 20 to fit an individual patient's unique anatomy. This should be done in a manner so as not to scratch or mar the surfaces of the bone plate 20, which otherwise may negatively affect the long-term fatigue performance of the plate member 20. For this purpose, a plate bending instrument may be used for altering the curvature of the plate 20 when necessary due to a unique anatomy. The plate bender is operated to either increase or decrease the radius of the lordotic curvature of the bone plate 20.
The particular embodiment of the present invention shown in
A pivot base 50 may be seated within each throughbore 22, and each throughbore 22 preferably features a plurality of access slots 30 to allow the pivot base 50 to enter the throughbore 22. As shown in
In this way, the substantially rigid pivot bases 50 may be seated within the throughbores 22 of the substantially rigid plate member 20 and may not be removed unless the pivot base 50 is returned to alignment with the access grooves 30, which would not be possible if a bone anchor such as a bone screw 70 extended through an opening 52 of a pivot base 50. When seated within the throughbore 22, the concave curvature of the throughbore wall 26 and the convex curvature of the pivot base outer surface 56 results in interfering dimensions, meaning that with the pivot base 50 and the plate member 20 being substantially rigid, the pivot base 50 could not be forced out of the throughbore 22 because the upper and lower rim portions 28, 29 would interfere with the outer surface 56 of the pivot base 50, as an outer diameter d3 of the base member 50 is larger than an upper rim diameter d4. A seated pivot base 50 could only be removed from the throughbore 22 by utilizing the access notches 30.
The pivot base 50 is free to move within the throughbore 22 relative to the plate 20 with the outer surface 56 of the pivot base 50 forming an articulating surface much like a sphere in a spherical pocket along the inner surface 26 of the throughbore 22. Thus, the pivot base 50 remains substantially within the throughbore 22 and is retained therein by the retention lips 38, as may be seen in
The pivot base retention lips 38 of the throughbores 22 prevent the pivot bases 50 from rotating or pivoting more than a predetermined amount within the throughbores 22. In this way, a pivot base 50 is free to pivot within the throughbore 22 only until the pivot base 50 contacts the retention lip 38. Once installed or seated within the throughbore 22, the pivot base 50 is inhibited by the retention members 38 from rotating or rolling such that the base member 50 may be realigned with the insertion notches 30 and come out of a seated configuration with the throughbore 22 and possibly be removed from the plate 20 itself. In a preferred form, the minimum load required to overcome the retention lip 38 to seat the pivot base 50 within the throughbore 22 is greater than the maximum load that is anticipated between the pivot base 50 and the retention lip 38 in other situations such as during transporting of the plate system 10 that may occur prior to the plate being implanted. It should be noted that due to the relatively thin profile of the retention lip 38, the remainder of the plate member 20 and the base member 50 are substantially more rigid than the retention lip. In the present embodiment, the access notches 30 are offset from the retention lips 38 so that the outer surface 56 of the base member 50 may be made flush with the inner surface 26 of the throughbore, the generally spherical surfaces 26, 56 facilitating rotational motion therebetween.
As is clear in
In a preferred form, the surgeon or clinician would receive the plate 20 prior to surgery with the spherical pivot bases 50 already seated within the throughbores 22 (as shown in
Each generally spherical pivot base 50 preferably defines an opening 52 featuring a sloped inner surface 54. The curved outer profile 56 of the pivot base 50 complements curved inner surface 26 of the throughbores 22 of the plate member 20. The bone plate system 10 may be secured to vertebrae 7 by bone anchors in the form of bone screws 70, resulting in the configuration shown in
Before the plate member 20 is secured to the spine 6 by the bone screws 70, the spherical pivot base 50 is free to rotate within the generally spherical pocket about the central axis of the throughbore 22. In this way, when the screws 70 are installed and the patient attempts to turn his or her neck or partially rotate his or her vertebrae 7 relative to one another, the pivot bases 50 will be fixed to the screws 70 but may allow some rotational motion within the throughbore 22 relative to the plate member 20. In such a case, the bone plate 20 will impart a degree of torsional resistance to limit spinal mobility, and based on the structural, mechanical, and material characteristics of the bone plate 20, relative motion between the coupled vertebrae 7 may be effectively eliminated with the plate 20 secured thereto.
Referring now to
To prevent the bone screw 70 from backing out of the bone 7 after installation, the pivot base 50 comprises a bone anchor retention lip 58 which contacts the retention surfaces 77 of the bone screw head portion 72 with a retention contact surface 59 of the retention lip 58. The surgical tool 910 is configured to compress the screw head 72 in a preferably radial manner which reduces the largest outer diameter of the screw head 72 such that the entire head portion 72 may enter into the opening 52 of the pivot base 50 and clear the retention lip 58 without necessitating contact between the bone screw 70 and the retention lip 58. In a preferred form, the compression of the head end 72 causes only elastic stress and the head portion 72 at least partially reexpands or returns to an uncompressed configuration when released within the opening 52 of the pivot base 50, but it will, of course, be appreciated that other forms are possible wherein a combination of elastic and plastic stress is created during the compression of head 72.
With the bone screw 70 installed in a manner satisfactory to the surgeon, the surgical tool 910 may release the jaw engagement portions 76, allowing the head portion 72 to expand to form contact between the sloped outer surface 84 of the bone screw 70 and the sloped inner surface 54 of the pivot base 50. Upon release, the expansion of the screw head 72 will cause the head end 72 to be retained within the opening 52 as defined by the sloped surface 54 and the retention lip 58. In this way, the bone screw 70 will be prevented from backing out of the bone 7 because the bone anchor retention lip 58 will keep the bone anchor head end 72 secured within the pivot base opening 52 when the instrument 910 has released the bone screw head 72 and allowed the head portion 72 to reexpand, causing a largest outer diameter d1 of the bone anchor head portion 72 to be larger than an entry diameter d2 of the base member 50. In this manner, the present invention provides an effective and reliable apparatus which inhibits the bone anchors 70 from backing out of bone 7 wherein threaded shank portions 80 of the bone screws 70 are secured. At the same time, this method whereby the bone screw 70 is retained offers minimal probability of failure and minimal risk for the pivot bases 50 or the bone screws 70 to come out of the plate member 20 while properly installed during the recovery period.
It should further be noted that in a preferred form, the retention surfaces 77 of the bone screw 70 and the retention contact surface 59 of the retention lip 58 of the pivot base 50 are configured such that a load wherein the bone screw 70 is pushed toward the retention lip 58 will not compress the head portion 72 and allow the bone screw 70 to back out of the opening 52 of the pivot base 50. Thus, the substantially rigid pivot bases 50 are prevented from being removed from the substantially rigid bone plate 20 by virtue of the interfering dimensions therebetween, and the bone anchors 70 may not be removed from the pivot bases 50 without the aid of a specialized bone anchor driving apparatus such as the surgical tool or driver 910.
Referring now to
As seen in
In a preferred form, a surgeon or clinician would engage the bone screw with the driver 910 as it appears in
The knob 922 and the handle 920 are preferably linked by a thrust bearing (not shown) allowing the knob 922 to remain stationary relative to the handle 920 as the handle 920 and shaft rotate in kind with one another. The shaft 960 is connected to the handle 920 such that as the handle 920 is rotated, the shaft 960 rotates, as well. In this way, the surgeon may hold the jeweler's knob 922 in the palm of his or her hand and rotate the handle 920 with his or her fingers. Thus, the screw 70 is connected to the engagement cross 968, the cam lock 930 is transitioned to the advancement orientation seen in
The surgeon may install the bone screw 70 into bone 7 in any desired orientation within a range of permissible orientations allowed by the plate member 20 and the pivot base 50. The compression of the bone screw head end 72 by the compression jaw 950 preferably allows the bone anchor member 70 to clear and pass by the head portion retention lip 58, and with the bone screw 70 is in a seated configuration, the cam lever 930 may be toggled to the retraction position to allow the resilient screw head 72 to at least partially reexpand within the pivot base opening 52. This toggle action causes the compression shaft or sleeve 940 to translate relative to the central shaft member 960 once more as the compression shaft 940 returns to the configuration shown in
It should be noted that the plate member 20 and any other bone plate member in accordance with the present invention may feature a plurality of bone pin holes (not shown) for inserting bone pins (not shown) into bone for temporarily restraining the bone plate in a desired location and orientation prior to driving bone anchors into bone to secure the plate member thereto. The bone pin holes may be placed at opposite and/or diagonal ends of the bone plate.
It should further be noted that in the event that the bone is stripped or chips during installation of the bone screws, a rescue screw (not shown) may be provided for securing the plate member to bone. A rescue screw is a screw that has a larger thread diameter, or a larger central or minor diameter, or both relative to conventional bone screws when secured within bone. The larger dimensions create a degree of interference with the bone and as such, the rescue screw is able to gain purchase in a stripped hole, treating the hole as if it were merely a pilot hole because of the larger size of the rescue screw.
Turning now to
The pivot bases 150 feature an opening 152 through which a bone screw 70 may pass in much the same manner described above with respect to the pivot base 50 of the previously discussed bone plate system 10. The extended members 160 are in general alignment with the longitudinal axis of the plate 120 and, in a preferred form, inhibit the pivot base 150 from rotating about the central axis of the throughbore 122. This is in contrast to the previous bone plate system 10 discussed above in which the pivot bases 50 are free to rotate about the central axis of the throughbores 22 until the bone screw 70 is driven into bone 7 and seated with the screw head portion 72 is allowed to expand within the opening 52 and form a tight fit between the complimentary sloped surfaces 54, 84 of the pivot base 50 and bone screw 70, respectively. It should be noted that features that are similar to features of the previously discussed bone plate system 10 may be denoted in a similar manner, such as throughbores 22 and 122 and pivot bases 50 and 150.
In addition to inhibiting the pivot base 150 from rotating about the central axis of the throughbore 122, the posts 160 also limit the range through which the pivot bases 150 may pivot fore and aft relative to the longitudinal axis of the plate member 120. The pivot base 150 is more limited in this range of motion relative to the pivot base 50 because a post member 160 on one side of the base member 150 will contact the bone and inhibit further pivoting in that angular direction.
Should the vertebrae 7 shift or move closer to each other during the recovery period, the extended members 160 may limit the amount that the screw 70 and pivot base 150 may pivot relative to the plate 120. In addition, the pegs 160 also allow the system 110 to impart more torsional resistance to inhibit movement of the coupled vertebrae. The plate 120 will impart some resistance when the patient attempts to move the coupled vertebrae relative to one another, but the pegs 160 further hinder this motion. The previously discussed system 10 featured spherical pivot bases 50 that did not have pegs or posts, and in this way the pivot base 50 could rotate slightly about the central axis of the throughbore 22. The system 110 featuring the generally spherical pivot base 150 with projecting members 160 will not allow such rotation about the central axis of the throughbore 122, and as such the system 120 will provide more substantial torsional resistance to attempted movement of the coupled vertebrae. This mechanical characteristic will be discussed in greater detail below as it relates to monoplate (single-row or single screw per vertebral level as opposed to double-row or dual screws per level) embodiments of the present invention.
Just as the pivot base 50 features a curved outer profile 56, the present pivot base 150 also features a curved outer profile 156 which is complementary to a curved inner surface 126 of the throughbore 122. The throughbore 122 also features an upper edge portion 128 and a lower edge portion 129. The preferably spherical complementary surfaces 126, 156 allow the pivot base 150 to pivot within the throughbore 122 about the two primary axes not constrained by the extended members 160. In this way, the pivot base 150 is free to pivot about the longitudinal axes of the posts 160, with the extended members 160 acting as pivot members and the surface 156 articulating relative to the inner surface 126 of the throughbore 122, this pivotal motion being limited by at least one pivot base retention lip 138 near the lower edge portion 129 of the throughbore 122. Should the pivot base 150 pivot to a predetermined limit, the base 150 will contact the retention lip 138, which will inhibit further pivoting in that particular direction. The pivot base 150 is also free to pivot such that one of the pegs 160 moves up relative to the bone 7120 while the other moves down relative to the bone 7, this motion being inhibited should a peg member 160 pivot into contact with a bone 7 or the pivot base 150 contact a retention lip 138. The pivot base 150 could also pivot both fore and aft and side to side with respect to the longitudinal axis of the plate member 20 at the same time. Regardless, the pivot base 150 preferably does not rotate about the central axis of the throughbore 122 beyond a predetermined amount of play provided within the peg slots 140. In a preferred embodiment, very little to no play is provided between the posts 160 and the side walls 144 of the post access grooves 140, but it is, of course, possible that in alternative embodiments a larger predetermined range of play may be allowed.
As seen in
Turning now to
Though apertures and/or impressions such as the apertures 232 or impressions 233, 234 are not shown as a feature all embodiments disclosed herein for exemplary purposes, it will of course be appreciated that and/or impressions may be incorporated a features of any bone plate systems described herein or any other possible embodiments incorporating features according to the present invention.
Looking now to
Generally, a surgeon choosing to utilize the bone plate system 310 will install only one such system 310, and the surgeon may install the system 310 centrally with respect to the anterior cervical region of the vertebral column 6 or the present bone plate system 310 may be installed such that the plate member 320 is positioned off-of-center with respect to the midsagittal plane. Such a decision would be a factor of the individual case of the patient and the preference of the surgeon, but some surgeons may install the bone plate system 310 off-of-center to ensure that the bone plate system 310 poses minimal interference to normal swallowing motions and avoids agitating or damaging the esophagus. The curved profile of the plate 320 allows a favorable contour to the bone 7 regardless of the surgeon or clinician's preference of a centered or off-of-center placement of the bone plate system 310.
Regardless of whether the present bone plate system 310 is installed in a centered or off-of-center position, the narrower profile of the plate member 320 may allow the present system 310 to be installed with a smaller incision, which may lead to less discomfort and/or a faster recovery. Furthermore, the single-row configuration requires fewer bone anchors and thus the surgery to secure the plate member 320 to bone 7 may be less time-consuming. A smaller plate profile is also less prone to inhibit swallowing and/or impede on the esophagus and other soft tissues. The narrower plate member 320 is thus less likely to irritate the esophagus and other tissues, decreasing the probability of complications such as esophageal dysphagia or other possible side-effects known to occur as a result of the presence of an anterior cervical plate.
In general, the narrower plate member 320 will not by itself offer the torsional resistance of the wider two-rowed plate members discussed above, but the extended members 160 of the pivot bases 150 will enhance the torsional resistance of the monoplate bone plate system 310 such that relative movement of the coupled vertebrae 7 is sufficiently inhibited. The posts 160 extend between the extended straight side portions 344 of the access slots 340, thus the pivot bases 150 are inhibited from rotating about the central axes of the throughbores 322 and thus the posts 160 contacting the extended side walls 342 of the peg slots 340 will serve to add to the torsional resistance supplied by the bone plate system 310 and inhibit rotation of the secured vertebrae 7 relative to one another. Thus, the pegs 160 allow the bone plate system 310 to offer sufficient torsional stability to be used without employing less elegant methods for attempting to increase torsional stability such as bone-engaging spikes that can be pressed into the face of a bone and may damage osseous tissue.
Turning now to
In the same way that the second pair elongated of throughbores 424 moving away from the standard pair 42 allows twice the translation of the first pair of elongated or dynamized throughbores 423, it will be appreciated that further embodiments are possible which may feature four or even five or more pairs of throughbores. In these cases, the fourth pair of throughbores of the plate member—the third pair moving away from the standard, non-dynamized pair—would preferably allow three times the length of translation that the second pair of throughbores 423 allows and the fifth pair of throughbores would preferably allow four times the length translation that the second pair of throughbores 423 allow. Generally, a choice regarding the number of pairs of throughbores on a bone plate is dependent on the type and severity of the injury, the number of vertebrae 7 being fused, the needs of a particular patient, and/or the preferences of a surgeon or specialist.
As discussed above, vertebrae 7 may shift or move closer together during the healing, grafting, and/or fusion process. In the previously discussed embodiments, the screws 70 driven into bones 7 may pivot relative to the plate member by way of the spherical pivot bases to accommodate the relative movement of the bones 7. In the present dynamic system 410, this movement may be accounted for by both pivoting and translation. Generally, the type of bone plate system chosen—standard or dynamic—is dependent on the type and severity of the injury, the number of vertebrae being fused, the expected amount of vertebral settling, and/or the preferences of the surgeon or specialist. In some cases, a surgeon may believe that the pivoting would be sufficient to accommodate the expected degree of shifting and/or changes in curvature. In other situations, a surgeon may believe that pivoting alone may not accommodate the expected shifting and/or changes in curvature and translation of the pivot bases 50 relative to the plate may be necessary, as well. If a surgeon believes that the recovery period may entail more movement between adjacent vertebrae than pivotal motion alone could accommodate, a bone plate system employing dynamized throughbores will generally be utilized. In these cases, the pivoting capability remains quite important and may still account for a portion of the vertebral settling, but the translational capability may be of primary importance, as well.
Should a bone plate system utilizing dynamic or dynamized throughbores be selected, the surgeon may use a specific installation configuration to provide advantageous conditions under which bone growth or healing is known to take place. The dynamized bone plates system 410 shown in
Seating the generally spherical pivot bases 50 into the standard or non-dynamized throughbores 422 of the present plate member 420 is preferably accomplished by same the procedure described above with respect to the standard throughbores 22 of the bone plate system 10, in which the pivot bases 50 are inserted using access or insertion slots 430. In the case of the elongated throughbores 423 and 424, no notches are necessary as the pivot bases 50 may be inserted and rolled into proper seating without the presence of insertion notches such as the access notches 30 on the standard throughbores 422. The pivot bases 50, however, must still be forced past at least one retention lip 438 just as the pivot base 50 must be forced past a retainment lip 38 in the previously discussed bone plate system 10. For the elongated throughbores 423 and 424, the elongation satisfies the geometric requirements for which the access or insertion grooves 430 are provided on the standard throughbores 422, and the retention lips 438 serve to retain the pivot bases 50 within their corresponding throughbores as the pivot bases 50 are thereby inhibited from rotating or rolling into a position wherein they may be removed from a seated configuration. The elongated throughbores 423, 424 further inhibit the pivot bases 50 from rolling out of the seated or retained configuration when a bone screw 70 is installed within a vertebra 7 and the bone screw head end 72 is seated and reexpanded within the opening 52 of the pivot base 50 and is retained therein by the retention lip 58.
Looking now to
Though the present dynamic bone plate system 510 is shown with only three pairs of throughbores, it will of course be appreciated that other embodiments having two, four, or even five or more sets of throughbores may be possible. As previously described, the throughbores disposed progressively further away from the standard, non-dynamized pair of throughbores 522 would preferably allow progressively greater lengths of translation in the direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the bone plate. In addition, it will be appreciated that for other possible embodiments according to the present invention that are similar to the present dynamic bone plate system 510 but feature more than three pairs of throughbores, the standard, non-dynamized pair of throughbores 522 may feature the pivot bases 150 with extended members or pegs 160 while the dynamized sets of throughbores may feature the spherical pivot bases 50 that do not feature extended members.
The standard throughbores 522 of the system 510 will feature access slots or cavities 540 to accommodate the use of pivot bases 150 comprising extended members 160. The spherical pivot bases 150 will preferably be seated in the same manner described above with respect to the standard bone plate system 110. The extended posts or pegs 160 serve to add to the torsional resistance of the plate member 520 in the region of the stationary vertebra 7 as well as limit the range through which the pivot bases 150 may pivot, as the posts 160 will eventually contact the bone 7 if pivoted far enough and the pivot base 150 is inhibited from rotating about one of the three primary axes. In a dynamized or dynamic throughbore such as the dynamized or elongated throughbores 523, it is not preferable to use a pivot base with extended members such as the pivot base 150 because the extended members 160 could restrict the desired range of motion. In a standard, non-dynamized throughbore 522 of the present dynamic bone plate system 510 however, a pivot base with extended members such as the pivot base 150 may be preferred. In this way, the spherical pivot bases 150 placed in the standard throughbore 522 will resist torsional stress and will not be free to rotate about the central axis of the throughbores 522, but the other spherical pivot bases 50 without extended members 160 that are seated within the elongated throughbores 523 are free to undergo pivotal and translational motion as well and rotate about the central axis of the throughbore 523.
In another aspect of the present invention, the dynamic bone plate systems 410 and 510 may employ a retainer or guide (not shown) during the installation of the bone screw 70 in a dynamized throughbore 423, 424, 523 that would hold the pivot base 50 within the throughbore in a particular orientation and aid the surgeon or clinician in spacing the pivot bases 50 to the farthest removed ends 423a, 424a, 523a from the standard, non-dynamized pair of throughbores 422, 522. A guide or retainer would aid the surgeon in creating optimal spacing between pivot bases 50 and insert the bone anchors 70 while allowing greater control over the bone anchor insertion trajectories so that the bone anchors 70 may be driven into bone 7 in the most desirable insertion angles. According to the needs of the patient and/or the preferences of the surgeon, a plurality of guides (not shown) offering various angles of trajectory or a single guide (not shown) which may be adjustable to any angle within a predetermined range of angles or to any of a predetermined set of available angles may be available.
It will, of course, be appreciated that a monoplate embodiment of a dynamic bone plate system utilizing a number of combinations of features of the previously discussed bone plate systems 310, 410, 510 is possible. It will also be appreciated that many combinations of features from the exemplary embodiments discussed above are possible, and that the invention is meant to encompass these and any other embodiments possible within the true scope and spirit of the appended claims.
The materials to be used for the bone plate systems 10, 110, 210, 310, 410, 510 described above must be sufficiently strong and demonstrate desirable mechanical characteristics while also fulfilling other requirements such as biocompatibility and galvanic corrosion considerations. For example, the bone plate members 20, 120, 220, 320, 420, 520 may be composed at least partially of titanium, a titanium alloy, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or carbon-fiber PEEK composite. The pivot base members 50, 150 may be composed at least partially of titanium, a titanium alloy, or cobalt-chrome alloy. Bone anchor members such as the bone screws 70 may be composed at least partially of titanium or titanium alloy. It will, of course, be appreciated that the materials listed herein are listed for exemplary purposes only, and the components described above could be composed of any materials that satisfy the mechanical, chemical, galvanic, and biocompatibility considerations necessary for successful implementation of bone plate systems embodying features in accordance with the present invention.
It will further be appreciated that while there have been described herein several particular embodiments of the present invention, the embodiments presented herein are not limiting and are presented herein for exemplary purposes only. Numerous changes and modifications may occur to those skilled in the art, and it is intended that the appended claims cover all those changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. The present invention shall therefore be recognized to include any and all embodiments that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/199,321 filed Aug. 27, 2008, entitled “Bone Plate Systems,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/968,233, filed Aug. 27, 2007, and entitled “Bone Plate Systems,” which are both hereby fully incorporated by reference as if set forth herein. U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/947,873, filed Jul. 3, 2007, and entitled “Bone Plate System” is also fully incorporated by reference as if set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 434503 | Corry | Aug 1890 | A |
| 556642 | Reessing | Mar 1896 | A |
| 872897 | Chapman | Dec 1907 | A |
| 95800 | Center | Mar 1910 | A |
| 951800 | Center | Mar 1910 | A |
| 1084680 | Wegener | Jan 1914 | A |
| 1087797 | Lowe | Feb 1914 | A |
| 1385780 | Dodds | Jul 1921 | A |
| 1409157 | Dodds | Mar 1922 | A |
| 1756239 | Chojnacki | Apr 1930 | A |
| 1907506 | Jacob | May 1933 | A |
| 1980336 | Hoagland | Nov 1934 | A |
| 2248054 | Joseph | Jul 1941 | A |
| 2376768 | Vasques | May 1945 | A |
| 2401856 | James | Jun 1946 | A |
| 2580821 | Toufick | Jan 1952 | A |
| 2628838 | Smalley | Feb 1953 | A |
| 2780223 | Haggland | Feb 1957 | A |
| 2877792 | Tybus | Mar 1959 | A |
| 3100516 | Julius | Aug 1963 | A |
| 3244170 | McElvenny | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3426364 | Lumb | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3534731 | Muller | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3596656 | Kaute | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3599977 | Glass | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3604487 | Gilbert | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3659595 | Haboush | May 1972 | A |
| 3695259 | Yost | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3741205 | Markolf | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3842825 | Wagner | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3844291 | Moen | Oct 1974 | A |
| RE28841 | Allgower et al. | Jun 1976 | E |
| 4003376 | McKay | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4029091 | Von | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4334599 | Ritsema | Jun 1982 | A |
| RE31040 | Possis | Sep 1982 | E |
| 4361141 | Tanner | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4388921 | Sutter | Jun 1983 | A |
| RE31628 | Allgower et al. | Jul 1984 | E |
| 4473068 | Oh | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4484570 | Sutter | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4488543 | Tornier | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4493317 | Klaue | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4503848 | Caspar | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4599086 | Doty | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4762122 | Slocum | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4771767 | Steffee | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776330 | Chapman | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4794918 | Wolter | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4890845 | Gatewood | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4892545 | Day | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4904261 | Dove | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905679 | Morgan | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4943292 | Foux | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4955908 | Frey | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4957497 | Hoogland | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4964403 | Karas | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5002544 | Klaue | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5020519 | Hayes | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5041113 | Biedermann | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5041114 | Chapman | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5053036 | Perren | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057111 | Park | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5085660 | Lin | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5092320 | Maurer | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5092866 | Breard | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5108395 | Laurain | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5113685 | Asher | May 1992 | A |
| 5127912 | Ray | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5127914 | Calderale | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5129899 | Small | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5129903 | Luhr | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5139498 | Astudillo | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5139499 | Small | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147360 | Dubousset | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147361 | Ojima | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151103 | Tepic | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180381 | Aust | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5190544 | Chapman | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5234431 | Keller | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242443 | Kambin | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5258005 | Christian | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5261910 | Warden | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5269784 | Mast | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5275601 | Gogolewski | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5304179 | Wagner | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5324290 | Zdeblick | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326206 | Moore | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330535 | Moser | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5344421 | Crook | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5346492 | Morgan | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5364399 | Lowery | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5380323 | Howland | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380327 | Eggers | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5382248 | Jacobson | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397363 | Gelbard | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5397364 | Kozak | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
| 5423826 | Coates | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5454769 | Chen | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458641 | Ramirez | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468242 | Reisberg | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5478342 | Kohrs | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480440 | Kambin | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5486176 | Hildebrand | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5501684 | Schlapfer | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507772 | Shutt | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5520690 | Errico | May 1996 | A |
| 5520696 | Wenstrom | May 1996 | A |
| 5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527311 | Procter | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531746 | Errico | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534027 | Hodorek | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534032 | Hodorek | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5549612 | Yapp | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5569247 | Morrison | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571109 | Bertagnoli | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578034 | Estes | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584887 | Kambin | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5601553 | Trebing | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5603713 | Aust | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607426 | Ralph | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607428 | Lin | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616144 | Yapp | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620443 | Gertzbein | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5626449 | McKinlay | May 1997 | A |
| 5643265 | Errico | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5647872 | Gilbert | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5651651 | Spencer | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653708 | Howland | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5667513 | Torrie | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676666 | Oxland | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5676703 | Gelbard | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681311 | Foley | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681312 | Yuan | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683392 | Richelsoph | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5683465 | Shinn | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690631 | Duncan | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5704936 | Mazel | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707372 | Errico | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5709686 | Talos | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713900 | Benzel | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720751 | Jackson | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725588 | Errico | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731275 | Prevost | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735850 | Baumgartner | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5735853 | Olerud | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5735899 | Schwartz | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741258 | Klaue | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5766176 | Duncan | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766254 | Gelbard | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782833 | Haider | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5797912 | Runciman | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800433 | Benzel | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5807396 | Raveh | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810823 | Klaue | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814048 | Morgan | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5827285 | Bramlet | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5840078 | Yerys | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843082 | Yuan | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5863293 | Richelsoph | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5876402 | Errico | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879389 | Koshino | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888221 | Gelbard | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5904683 | Pohndorf | May 1999 | A |
| 5916200 | Eppley | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5941885 | Jackson | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5951557 | Luter | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951558 | Fiz | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954635 | Foley | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964760 | Richelsoph | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5964761 | Kambin | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5964762 | Biedermann | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976141 | Haag | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980540 | Bruce | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984924 | Asher | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6010503 | Richelsoph | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017345 | Richelsoph | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022350 | Ganem | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030389 | Wagner | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036693 | Yuan | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039740 | Olerud | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6090111 | Nichols | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096044 | Boyd | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106557 | Robioneck | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117173 | Taddia | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6129730 | Bono | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132432 | Richelsoph | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132434 | Sherman | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139550 | Michelson | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6152927 | Farris | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159213 | Rogozinski | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174311 | Branch | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183476 | Gerhardt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6189422 | Stihl | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193720 | Yuan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193721 | Michelson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6206881 | Frigg | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206882 | Cohen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214005 | Benzel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224602 | Hayes | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6226548 | Foley | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228085 | Theken | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235032 | Link | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235033 | Brace | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235034 | Bray | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241731 | Fiz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254603 | Gertzbein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6257593 | White | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6258089 | Campbell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261042 | Pratt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261291 | Talaber | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273889 | Richelsoph | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280445 | Morrison | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287313 | Sasso | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290703 | Ganem | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293949 | Justis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| D449692 | Michelson | Oct 2001 | S |
| 6306136 | Baccelli | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306139 | Fuentes | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315779 | Morrison | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322562 | Wolter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328738 | Suddaby | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331179 | Freid | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332887 | Knox | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6342055 | Eisermann | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342057 | Brace | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6355040 | Richelsoph | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361537 | Anderson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364880 | Michelson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379364 | Brace | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6381806 | Stanesic | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6383186 | Michelson | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398783 | Michelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402206 | Simmons | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402755 | Pisharodi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402756 | Ralph | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402759 | Strong | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406478 | Kuo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413259 | Lyons | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416528 | Michelson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423068 | Reisberg | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428542 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440133 | Beale | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454711 | Haddad | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454769 | Wagner | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6454771 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458133 | Lin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471704 | Gertzbein | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6478797 | Paul | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485491 | Farris | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6485591 | Nakao | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6503250 | Paul | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6527776 | Michelson | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530929 | Justis | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6533786 | Needham | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6565565 | Yuan | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572619 | Santilli | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6575975 | Brace | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6579290 | Hardcastle | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585769 | Muhanna | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6592586 | Michelson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595993 | Donno | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6599290 | Bailey | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6602255 | Campbell | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6602256 | Hayes | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6602257 | Thramann | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605090 | Trieu | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6613053 | Collins | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6613728 | Sirianni | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6616666 | Michelson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6620163 | Michelson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6623486 | Weaver | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626907 | Campbell | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6627590 | Sherry | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6648888 | Shluzas | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652525 | Assaker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6660006 | Markworth | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663632 | Frigg | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6666866 | Martz | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669700 | Farris | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6692503 | Foley | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695846 | Richelsoph | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6749614 | Teitelbaum | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755829 | Bono | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6755833 | Paul | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6793656 | Mathews | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6860883 | Janowski | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875212 | Shaolian | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6890334 | Brace | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6890335 | Grabowski | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6916320 | Michelson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6951538 | Ritland | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6964664 | Freid | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6964667 | Shaolian | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966735 | Yamazaki | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6997086 | Graham | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7011660 | Sherman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7048739 | Konieczynski | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7074221 | Michelson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081117 | Bono | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083621 | Shaolian | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7090674 | Doubler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7125426 | Moumene | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141051 | Janowski | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7273481 | Lombardo | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7410496 | Derouet | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7452370 | Anderson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7476239 | Jackson | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7476240 | Raymond | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7618443 | Abdou | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7635366 | Abdou | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7662175 | Jackson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7666185 | Ryan | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7682379 | Mathieu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7766915 | Jackson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7780706 | Marino | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794482 | Mathieu | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7854752 | Colleran | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7857836 | Huebner | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7862591 | Dewey | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7875065 | Jackson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7887569 | Frigg | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7901437 | Jackson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7909852 | Boomer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918878 | Songer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922727 | Songer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7927359 | Trautwein | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7935126 | Orbay | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942909 | Hammill | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942910 | Doubler | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942911 | Doubler | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7947065 | Hammill | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951170 | Jackson | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951173 | Hammill | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7951179 | Matityahu | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7967850 | Jackson | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8012177 | Jackson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8025681 | Colleran | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8192439 | Songer | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8361126 | Perrow | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8551141 | Gephart | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8623019 | Perrow | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8641719 | Gephart | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 9033988 | Gephart et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 20010014807 | Wagner | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021851 | Eberlein | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037112 | Brace | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041894 | Campbell | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047172 | Foley | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047174 | Donno | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013586 | Justis | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016595 | Michelson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022843 | Michelson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029040 | Morrison | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045896 | Michelson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045898 | Freid | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045899 | Errico | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049444 | Knox | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058939 | Wagner | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065517 | Paul | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068938 | Jackson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077630 | Lin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111630 | Ralph | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120268 | Berger | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120271 | Dixon | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120272 | Yuan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120273 | Needham | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128654 | Steger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128655 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151893 | Santilli | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151899 | Bailey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151900 | Glascott | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156474 | Wack | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161368 | Foley | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161370 | Frigg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173790 | Chang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183747 | Jao | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183754 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183755 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183756 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183757 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188296 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004519 | Torode | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018335 | Michelson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023242 | Harrington | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040749 | Grabowski | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045880 | Michelson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060826 | Foley | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060828 | Michelson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073998 | Pagliuca | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078583 | Biedermann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093082 | Campbell | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105462 | Haider | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125742 | Yuan | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130661 | Osman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149434 | Paul | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030153920 | Ralph | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167058 | Shluzas | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181912 | Michelson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187440 | Richelsoph | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187441 | Bolger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187442 | Richelsoph | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187509 | Lemole | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191471 | Michelson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191472 | Michelson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208203 | Lim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208204 | Bailey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225408 | Nichols | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225409 | Freid | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229347 | Sherman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236447 | Ritland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019353 | Freid | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030338 | Paul | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039384 | Boehm | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059333 | Carl | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068319 | Cordaro | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082960 | Davison | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087951 | Khalili | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092938 | Carli | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092952 | Newton | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097934 | Farris | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097935 | Richelsoph | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097950 | Foley | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122426 | Michelson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127896 | Lombardo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127897 | Freid | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127899 | Konieczynski | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127900 | Konieczynski | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133201 | Shluzas | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138662 | Landry | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143265 | Landry | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147937 | Dunbar | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158246 | Assaker | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172022 | Landry | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186482 | Kolb | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204710 | Patel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204716 | Fanger | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204717 | Fanger | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215190 | Nguyen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220570 | Frigg | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220571 | Assaker et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230100 | Shluzas | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230191 | Frey | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236334 | Michelson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004519 | VanJaarsveldt | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021030 | Pagliuca | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021031 | Foley | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033297 | Davison | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033298 | Hawkes | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033299 | Shluzas | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038436 | Michelson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049593 | Duong | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065516 | Jahng | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065517 | Chin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075540 | Shluzas | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075644 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080418 | Simonson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085813 | Spitler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090822 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090824 | Shluzas | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090833 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090899 | DiPoto | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107789 | Sweeney | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131408 | Sicvol | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131419 | McCord | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131420 | Techiera | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131421 | Anderson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131422 | Anderson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137593 | Gray | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149022 | Shaolian | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149036 | Varieur | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149053 | Varieur | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154389 | Selover | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159651 | Raymond | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171540 | Lim | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171551 | Sukovich | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192570 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192577 | Mosca | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192579 | Jackson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192589 | Raymond | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215999 | Birkmeyer | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216002 | Simonson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228380 | Moore | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228400 | Chao | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234456 | Malandain | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245942 | DiPoto | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251192 | Shluzas | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273131 | Shluzas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273132 | Shluzas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273133 | Shluzas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288671 | Yuan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060036244 | Spitler | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074445 | Gerber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060079900 | Mathieu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089651 | Trudeau | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106387 | Fanger | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111714 | Foley | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122602 | Konieczynski | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122604 | Gorhan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149256 | Wagner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060155278 | Warnick | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161157 | Mosca | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167457 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167547 | Suddaby | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173456 | Hawkes | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200135 | Sherman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200147 | Ensign | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217725 | Suh | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229614 | Foley | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235393 | Bono | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235399 | Carls et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241600 | Ensign | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241616 | Konieczynski | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247630 | Iott | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247636 | Yuan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264962 | Chin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276791 | Shluzas | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276792 | Ensign | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070010817 | De Corninck | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055235 | Janowski | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055251 | Huebner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078460 | Frigg | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093817 | Barrus | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093826 | Hawkes | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093827 | Warnick | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123879 | Songer | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162016 | Matityahu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185491 | Foley | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198015 | Foley | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213714 | Justis | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225711 | Ensign | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270880 | Lindemann | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288004 | Alvarez | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080027439 | Sasing | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039840 | Songer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154277 | Machalk | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172094 | Mathieu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177330 | Ralph | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195155 | Hoffman | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228233 | Hoffman | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243133 | Heinz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090012571 | Perrow | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024170 | Kirschman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038446 | Ensign | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062862 | Perrow | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228054 | Hoffman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234395 | Hoffman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100030278 | Hawkes | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100160977 | Gephart | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110112584 | Frigg | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20130131685 | Perrow | May 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| EP1561429 | Feb 2004 | BE |
| 251246 | Dec 1911 | DE |
| 1949923 | Apr 1971 | DE |
| 2933141 | Apr 1980 | DE |
| 4409833 | Oct 1995 | DE |
| 19548395 | Sep 1997 | DE |
| 0179695 | Apr 1986 | EP |
| 0201024 | Nov 1986 | EP |
| 0242842 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 0251583 | Jan 1988 | EP |
| 0410309 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0455255 | Nov 1991 | EP |
| 0471418 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0502815 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 0599640 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0699057 | Mar 1996 | EP |
| 0767631 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 0809971 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0809972 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0828459 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 0874595 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0876128 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0897697 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 0903113 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0988833 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 0995404 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 0999796 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1106114 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1106144 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1169971 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1185210 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1220645 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1285632 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1306058 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1336383 | Aug 2003 | EP |
| 1340468 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1346697 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1364623 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 2435243 | Apr 1980 | FR |
| 2519857 | Jul 1983 | FR |
| 2556583 | Jun 1985 | FR |
| 2726461 | May 1996 | FR |
| 2740321 | Apr 1997 | FR |
| 2794963 | Dec 2000 | FR |
| 2810532 | Dec 2001 | FR |
| 1424824 | Sep 1988 | SU |
| 8803781 | Jun 1988 | WO |
| 9103994 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| 9417744 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| 9525474 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| 9531941 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 9600530 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| 9605778 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| 9608206 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 9629948 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9632071 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9639975 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9722306 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| 9834553 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| 9834556 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| 9851226 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 9904718 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| 9921502 | May 1999 | WO |
| 9956653 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| 9959492 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| 0003653 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| 0025689 | May 2000 | WO |
| 0066011 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0078238 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0101874 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 0126566 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 0126567 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 0149191 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0164144 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 0182804 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0182805 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0189400 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0189428 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 02076317 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 02080789 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 02098276 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 02098277 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 03007826 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 03017856 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| 03053262 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 03063714 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 03071966 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2004017847 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004047650 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2004071339 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2006091863 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2008024937 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EP1561429 Machine English Translation Document accessed on Aug. 4, 2016. |
| Armstrong, Gordon; Chow, Donald. The Contoured Anterior Spinal Plate. Spinal Instrumentation. 1992. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore, MD, USA. |
| Benzel, Edward, MD; Leon, Steven, MD. Enhancing Cervical Spine Fusion, www.medscape.com. Mar. 2001. 31 pages. |
| Bose, Bikash, MD. Anterior Cervical Fusion Using Caspar Plating: Analysis of Results and Review of the Literature. Surgical Neurology, vol. 29, No. 1. Jan. 1998. 8 pages. Elsevier Biomedical; New York, NY, USA. |
| Caspar, W, Barbier, DD, Klara, PM. Anterior Cervical Fusion and Caspar Plate Stabilization for Cervical Trauma. Neurosurgery, vol. 25, No. 4. Oct. 1989. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Hagerstown, MD, USA. 1 page. |
| Chang, J.H.; Chang, G.L.; Hsu, A.T.. Kinematic Study of Cervical Vertebrae Adjacent to Fixation Procedures. 1999 Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA. Jun. 1999. 2 pages. |
| Chen, Ing-Ho, Yang, Rong-Sen, Chen, Po-Quang. Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 90, No. 2. Feb. 1991. Scientific Communications International, Hong Kong, China. 4 pages. |
| Clausen, John; Tyken, Timothy, MD; Traynelis, Vincent, MD; Sawin, Paul, MD; Dexter, Franklin, MD; Goel, Vijay. Biomechanical Evaluation of Caspar and Cervical Spine Locking Plate Systems in a Cadaveric Model. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 84, No. 6. Jun. 1996. 9 pages. American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Rolling Meadows, IL, USA. |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 18, 2008, from the International Searching Authority in corresponding International (PCT) Application No. PCT/US2008/069221. |
| Moftakhar, Roham, MD; Trost, Gregory, MD. Anterior Cervical Plates: A Historical Perspective. Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 16, No. 1. Jan. 2004. American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Charlottesville, VA, USA. 5 pages. |
| Omeis et al., “History of Instrumentation for Stabilization of the Subaxial Cervical Spine,” Neurosurg Focus 16 (1): Article 10, 2004. |
| Paramour, Christoper, MD; Dickman, Curtis, MD; Sonntag, Volker, MD. Radiographic and Clinical Follow-Up Review of Caspar Plates in 49 Patents. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 84, No. 6. Jun. 1996. 5 pages. American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Rolling Meadows, IL, USA. |
| Pitzen, T.; Steudel, W.; Oxland, T. The Effect of Posterior Element Injury on Cervical Spine Flexibility While Using Anterior Plates With and Without Posterior Fixation. An In Vitro Trauma Model. 52nd Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery, Bielefeld, Germany. May 2001. 1 page. |
| Takahashi, Toshiyuki; Tominaga, Teiji; Yoshimoto, Takashi; Koshu, Keiji; Tokobori, A. Toshimitsu; Aizawa, Yoichi. Biomechanical Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Intervertebral Graft and Anterior Cervical Plating in a Porcine Cadaveric Model. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 7, No. 2. 1997. IOS Press; Amsterdam, Netherlands. 7 pages. |
| Tippets, Richard H., MD; Apfelbaum, Ronald I., MD. Anterior Cervical Fusion with the Caspar Instrumentation System. Neurosurgery, vol. 22, No. 6, Part 1. Jun. 1998. 6 pages. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Hagerstown, MD, USA. |
| Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2008, from the International Searching Authority in corresponding International (PCT) Application No. PCT/US2008/069221. |
| Zdeblick, Thomas, MD; Ghanayem, Alexander, MD; Rapoff, Andrew, MS; Swain, Carol, MS; Bassett, Tim, MD; Cooke, Mary, MS; Markel, Mark, DVM. Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages: An Animal Model With and Without Bone Morphogenetic Protein. Spine, vol. 23, No 7. Apr. 1998. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Hagerstown, MD, USA. 8 pages. |
| Foley, M.D., Kevin T., Schwender, MD., James D., and Rouben, MD., David P., PyrametriX.RTM. Advance: Instrument Set Technique, surgical brochure provided by manufacturer Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 2005, (25 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130131685 A1 | May 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60968233 | Aug 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12199321 | Aug 2008 | US |
| Child | 13747131 | US |
