Bone positioning and preparing guide systems and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11602387
  • Patent Number
    11,602,387
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 3, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 14, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Methods for temporarily fixing an orientation of a bone or bones. Methods of correcting a bunion deformity. Bone positioning devices. Methods of using a bone positioning device. Bone preparation guides. Methods of using a bone preparation guide.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to devices and methods for positioning and/or preparing bones.


BACKGROUND

Bones, such as the bones of a foot, may be anatomically misaligned. In certain circumstances, surgical intervention is required to correctly align the bones to reduce patient discomfort and improve patient quality of life.


SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention include methods for temporarily fixing an orientation of a bone or bones. In general, the method of positioning a bone includes the steps of moving a bone from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position with respect to another bone and preparing an end of the bone and a facing end of another bone. In some embodiments, at least one bone end is prepared after the bone is moved into the aligned position. In some embodiments, the bone is anatomically aligned in more than one plane such that the bone both translates and rotates in response to a moving force.


One embodiment includes a method of correcting a bunion deformity. The method has the steps of moving a first metatarsal from an anatomically misaligned position with respect to a second metatarsal to an anatomically aligned position with respect to the second metatarsal by applying a force to the first metatarsal, the force moving the first metatarsal to correct an alignment in more than one plane. The method can also include preparing an end of the first metatarsal and preparing an opposing end of a medial cuneiform for fusion. Embodiments of the invention also include a bone positioning device and a bone preparation guide, and methods of using such guides.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following drawings are illustrative of particular embodiments of the present invention and, therefore, in no way limit the scope of the invention. The drawings are not necessarily to scale (unless otherwise stated) and are intended for use in conjunction with the explanations in the following detailed description. Embodiments of the invention will hereinafter be described with respect to the appended drawings, wherein like numerals denote like elements.



FIG. 1 is a side perspective view of a bone positioning guide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a side perspective view of a bone engagement member of a bone positioning guide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3A is a side perspective view of a tip of a bone positioning guide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3B is a side view of a bone positioning guide with a straight tip in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3C is a side view of a bone positioning guide with a nonlinear tip in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is an end view of an actuator of a bone positioning guide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 is a top plan view of a bone preparing guide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6A is a perspective view of a bone preparing guide, a spacer, and a tissue removing instrument location check member in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6B is a perspective view of another embodiment of a tissue removing instrument check location member engaged with a bone preparing guide.



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a bone preparing guide engaged with a spacer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a bone preparing guide engaged with a tissue removal instrument location check member in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 9A is a front view of a bone positioning guide on a deformed foot in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 9B is a front view of a bone positioning guide on a foot with a corrected alignment in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 10A is a top view of a bone positioning guide on a deformed foot in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 10B is a top view of a bone positioning guide on a foot with a corrected alignment in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 11A-C depict a sequence of a bone positioning operation using a bone positioning guide on a foot at first, second, and third positions in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 12A is a front view of a foot with a normal first metatarsal position.



FIG. 12B is a front view of a foot with an isolated first metatarsal rotation bunion deformity.



FIG. 13A is a top view of a foot with a normal first metatarsal position.



FIG. 13B is a top view of a foot with an isolated first metatarsal transverse plane bunion deformity.



FIG. 14A is a side view of a foot with a normal first metatarsal position.



FIG. 14B is a side view of a foot with an isolated first metatarsal sagittal plane bunion deformity.



FIG. 15A is a perspective view and an enlarged view of a foot.



FIG. 15B is a perspective view of a first metatarsal.



FIG. 16 is a side perspective view of a foot depicting a bone preparation instrument inserted into a joint.



FIG. 17 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot prior to an alignment of a first metatarsal.



FIG. 18 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot after an alignment of a first metatarsal.



FIG. 19 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot after an alignment of a first metatarsal and an insertion of a spacer into a joint space.



FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot after an alignment of a first metatarsal and a positioning of a bone preparation guide.



FIG. 21A is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot after an alignment of a first metatarsal and a positioning of a bone preparation guide with pins.



FIG. 21B is another perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot after an alignment of a first metatarsal and a positioning of a bone preparation guide with pins.



FIG. 22 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone preparation instrument preparing a bone of the foot guided by a guide surface of a bone preparation guide.



FIG. 23 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot and a removal of a bone preparation guide.



FIG. 24 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot and pins.



FIG. 25 is a perspective view of a foot depicting a bone positioning guide on the foot and a compression pin.



FIG. 26A is a side perspective view of a foot depicting bone plates across a joint between first and second bones and a compression pin in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 26B is a side perspective view of a foot depicting bone plates across a joint between first and second bones and a compression pin in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 27 is a side perspective view of a foot depicting bone plates across a joint between first and second bones in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 28A and FIG. 28B depict examples of anatomically misaligned metatarsals and metatarsals that have been anatomically aligned using methods and/or instruments in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 29A and FIG. 29B depict examples of anatomically misaligned metatarsals and metatarsals that have been anatomically aligned using methods and/or instruments in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 30A illustrates a portion of a foot having a bunion caused by a misaligned first metatarsal relative to a second metatarsal.



FIG. 30B shows an example base compression that can be caused after the foot of FIG. 30A is anatomically aligned.



FIG. 31 illustrates an example bone positioning operation in which a fulcrum is positioned at an intersection between a first bone and a second bone.



FIG. 32 is a perspective view of one example fulcrum.



FIG. 33 illustrates an example system of different sized fulcrums.



FIG. 34 is a perspective view of another bone positioning guide according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 35 illustrates an example configuration of a joint spacer that can allow a bone preparation guide to rotate around the spacer.



FIG. 36A is a perspective view of an example configuration of a bone positioning guide having an opening with circular cross-sectional shape.



FIG. 36B is a perspective view of the example bone positioning guide of FIG. 36A shown with the joint spacer from FIG. 35 inserted into the guide.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description is exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the following description provides practical illustrations for implementing exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Examples of constructions, materials, and dimensions are provided for selected elements, and all other elements employ that which is known to those of ordinary skill in the field of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the noted examples have a variety of suitable alternatives.


Embodiments of the invention include a bone positioning guide and method of positioning bones in a medical procedure. In an exemplary application, embodiments of the bone positioning guide can be useful during a surgical procedure, such as a bone alignment, osteotomy, fusion procedure, and/or other procedures where one or more bones are to be prepared (e.g., cartilage or bone removal and/or cut). Such a procedure can be performed, for example, on bones (e.g., adjacent bones separated by a joint or different portions of a single bone) in the foot or hand, where bones are relatively smaller compared to bones in other parts of the human anatomy. In one example, a procedure utilizing an embodiment of the bone positioning guide can be performed to correct an alignment between a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal) and a second metatarsal and/or a cuneiform (e.g., a medial, or first, cuneiform), such as in a bunion correction surgery. An example of such a procedure is a Lapidus procedure (also known as a first tarsal-metatarsal fusion). In another example, the procedure can be performed by modifying an alignment of a metatarsal (e.g., a first metatarsal). An example of such a procedure is a basilar metatarsal osteotomy procedure.



FIG. 1 shows a side perspective view of a bone positioning guide 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The bone positioning guide 10 can be useful for positioning a bone (e.g., orientating and/or translating) during a medical procedure. In some embodiments, the bone positioning guide includes a bone engagement member, a tip, a mechanism to urge the bone engagement member and the tip towards each other (e.g. moving the bone engagement member towards the tip, moving the tip towards the bone engagement member, or moving both simultaneously), and an actuator to actuate the mechanism. When the mechanism is actuated it causes a first bone engaged with the bone engagement member to move to correct an alignment in more than one plane with respect to a second bone in contact with the tip. In some embodiments, the correction in more than one plane includes a correction about an axis in a frontal plane.


In the embodiment of FIG. 1, bone positioning guide 10 includes a main body member 20 and a shaft 30, and the bone engagement member 40 is connected to the shaft and the tip 50 is connected to the main body member. In general, the main body member 20 can be sized and shaped to clear anatomy or other instrumentation (e.g., pins and guides) while positioned on a patient. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the main body member 20 includes a generally C-shaped configuration with a first end 60 and a second end 70. In some embodiments, the main body is sized and configured to engage bones of a human foot. In addition, although bone positioning guide 10 is illustrated as being formed of two components, main body member 20 and shaft 30, the guide can be fabricated from more components (e.g., 3, 4, or more) that are joined together to form the guide.


A shaft 30 can be movably connected to the main body member 20 proximate its first end 60. In some embodiments, the shaft 30 includes threads 80 that engage with the main body member 20 such that rotation of the shaft translates the shaft with respect to the main body member. In other embodiments, the shaft can slide within the main body member and can be secured thereto at a desired location with a set screw. In yet other embodiments, the shaft can be moved with respect to the main body by a ratchet mechanism. In the embodiment shown, the shaft moves along an axis that intersects the tip 50. In other embodiments, such as that described with respect to FIG. 34, the shaft 30 and/or bone engagement member 40 is offset from tip 50.


As shown in FIG. 2, embodiments of the bone positioning device can have a bone engagement member 40. In some embodiments, the bone engagement member includes a surface 90 configured to contact a bone, such as a metatarsal or a cuneiform. In the embodiment shown, the surface 90 is concave. Such a surface is adapted to promote surface contact with a generally cylindrical bone, such as a metatarsal. Other embodiments of surface shapes include planar surfaces and V-shaped surfaces. When using a concave or V-shaped bone engagement member 40, the sidewalls of the concavity or V-shaped groove may be symmetrical or asymmetrical. In a symmetrical configuration, the bottom of the concavity or groove can be centered between upwardly extending sidewalls configured to receive a bone. Each sidewall can extend upwardly to the same height and/or at the same slope. In the asymmetrical configuration, one sidewall can have a different configuration than the opposing sidewall. For example, one of the sidewalls may extend upwardly from the bottom of the concavity or groove to a lower height than the opposing sidewall. As another example, one sidewall may extend upwardly at a different angle than the opposing sidewall. The asymmetrical configuration can be useful for applying a force that is biased laterally instead of only being linear toward tip 50.


In some embodiments, bone engagement member 40 includes a pin or a clamp. Independent of whether bone engagement member 40 includes such pin or clamp, the bone engagement member can engage an anatomical feature of a bone, such as a ridge (e.g., a medial ridge of a first metatarsal). In such embodiments, the engagement generally prohibits rotational movement of the bone with respect to the bone engagement member. In other embodiments, bone may be allowed to rotate with respect to the bone engagement member.


In the embodiment shown, the bone engagement member 40 is provided on an end of the shaft 30. In the embodiment of the shaft shown having threads 80, the bone engagement member 40 can be rotatably coupled to the shaft 30. In such embodiments, as the shaft is rotated relative to the main body member the bone engagement member 40 may or may not rotate with respect to the main body member even as it translates with respect to the main body member along with the shaft 30 and rotates with respect to the shaft. The bone engagement member may oscillate about the shaft 30, but generally does not rotate with respect to bone after contact with the bone.



FIGS. 3A-C depict a tip 50 of bone positioning guide 10, which can be at a second end 70 of the main body member opposite the first end. The tip 50 can be useful for contacting a bone, generally a bone distinct from a bone contacting the bone engagement member. For example, if the bone engagement member is in contact with a first metatarsal, the tip can be in contact with a metatarsal other than the first metatarsal (e.g., the second, third, fourth, or fifth metatarsal). In some embodiments, the tip is tapered to facilitate percutaneous insertion and contact with bone. The tip can also include a textured surface 100, such as serrated, roughened, cross-hatched, knurled, etc., to reduce slippage between the tip and bone. In the embodiment shown, the tip further includes a stop 110 to limit a depth of insertion. The shape of the tip can be configured to stably contact bone. For example, FIG. 3B shows a side view of the bone positioning guide with a generally straight tip 50, while FIG. 3C shows a side view of the bone positioning guide with a nonlinear tip 50 (e.g., a tip that is angled or curved). In some embodiments, the tip is configured to restrict translational movement between it and a bone, but to allow rotational movement between it and the bone.


As shown in FIG. 4, bone positioning guide 10 can also include an actuator (e.g., a knob or a handle) 120 to actuate the mechanism, in this embodiment associated with the shaft. In the embodiment shown, the actuator can be useful for allowing a user to rotate the shaft with respect to the main body member 20. Also as shown in FIG. 4, the actuator, shaft, and bone engagement member may include a cannulation 130 to allow the placement of a fixation wire (e.g., K-wire) through these components and into contact with or through a bone engaged with the bone engagement member. For example, the fixation wire can be placed into the bone engaged with bone engagement member 40 to fix the position of the bone engagement member with respect to the bone. In another example, the fixation wire can be placed through the bone in contact with the bone engagement member and into an adjacent bone to maintain a bone position of the bone in contact with the bone engagement member and the adjacent bone.


In other embodiments, the mechanism to urge the bone engagement member and the tip towards each other can include a tenaculum or tong structure. In such embodiments, the guide can include a first shaft pivotably connected to a second shaft. A first end of each shaft can include an actuator, such as a handle. A second end of the first shaft can include a bone engagement member, as described above. And a second end of the second shaft can include a tip, as described above. In use, the actuator can be actuated (e.g., squeezed together) to move the bone engagement member and the tip closer together to position bone. Other embodiments of this type may include another set of shafts and another pivoting connection such that the bone engagement member and tip translate towards each other when the actuator is actuated.


In other embodiments, the mechanism to urge the bone engagement member and the tip towards each other can include a rack and pinion structure. In such embodiments, the rack can include a tip, as described above. And the pinion can include a bone engagement member, as described above, and an actuator (e.g., a knob). In use, the actuator can be actuated (e.g., turned about an axis generally perpendicular to a direction of travel) to move the bone engagement member and the tip closer together to position bone.


Embodiments of the bone positioning guide may include any suitable materials. In certain embodiments, the bone positioning guide is fabricated from a radiolucent material such that it is relatively penetrable by X-rays and other forms of radiation, such as thermoplastics and carbon-fiber materials. Such materials are useful for not obstructing visualization of bones using an imaging device when the bone positioning guide is positioned on bones.


Embodiments of the bone positioning guide can be useful in operation for temporarily positioning a bone or bones during a medical procedure. Bone positioning can be useful, for instance, to correct an anatomical misalignment of bones and temporarily maintain an anatomically aligned position, such as in a bone alignment and/or fusion procedure. In some embodiments, the bone positioning guide is capable of reducing an angle between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal from over 10 degrees (e.g., up to about 35 degrees) to about 10 degrees or less (e.g., to about 1-5 degrees), including to negative angles of about −5 degrees. In some embodiments, the bone positioning guide is also capable of rotating the first metatarsal about its long axis with respect to the medial cuneiform from a rotational angle of over 4 degrees to a rotational angle of less than 4 degrees (e.g., to about 0 to 2 degrees).


In some embodiments, a bone preparation guide may be provided to facilitate the preparation of a bone. The bone preparation guide can be provided with a bone positioning guide, or either device can be provided or used independently. An example of a bone preparation guide 150 is shown in FIG. 5. In some embodiments, the bone preparation guide 150 includes a body 154 defining a first guide surface 160 to define a first preparing plane and a second guide surface 164 to define a second preparing plane. A tissue removing instrument (e.g., a saw, rotary bur, osteotome, etc., not shown) can be aligned with the surfaces to remove tissue (e.g., remove cartilage or bone and/or make cuts to bone). The first and second guide surfaces 160, 164 can be spaced from each other by a distance, (e.g., between about 2 millimeters and about 10 millimeters, such as between about 4 and about 7 millimeters). In the embodiment shown, the first and second guide surfaces are parallel, such that cuts to adjacent bones using the guide surfaces will be generally parallel.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 5, a first facing surface 166 is positioned adjacent the first guide surface 160 and/or a second facing surface 168 is positioned adjacent the second guide surface 164. In such embodiments, the distance between the first guide surface and the first facing surface defines a first guide slot, and the distance between the second guide surface and the second facing surface defines a second guide slot. Each slot can be sized to receive a tissue removing instrument to prepare the bone ends. The first and second slots may be parallel or skewed. In the illustrated embodiment, the facing surfaces each contain a gap, such that the surface is not a single, continuous surface. In other embodiments, the facing surfaces can be a single, continuous surface lacking any such gap.


An opening 170 can be defined by the body 154 between the first and second guide surfaces. The opening can be an area between the guide surfaces useful for allowing a practitioner to have a visual path to bones during bone preparation and/or to receive instruments. In the embodiment shown, the opening extends across the body and a distance from a surface 172 opposite of the first facing surface 166 to a surface 174 opposite of the second facing surface 168.


The embodiment shown also includes a first end 176 extending from the body 154 in a first direction and a second end 178 extending from the body in a second direction. The second direction can be different than the first direction (e.g., an opposite direction). As shown, each of the first end and the second end can include at least one fixation aperture 180 configured to receive a fixation pin (not shown in FIG. 5) to secure the guide to a bone. As shown, such apertures may extend through the end at a vertical or skewed angle relative to a top surface of the guide.


The bone preparation guide 150 can also include a first adjustable stabilization member 182 engaged with the first end 176. In some embodiments, the bone preparation guide can include a second adjustable stabilization member 184 engaged with the second end 178. Each of the members can be threaded and engage a threaded aperture defined by the ends. The elevation of each end can be adjusted with respect to a bone by adjusting the stabilization member. In some embodiments, as shown, the stabilization members are cannulated such that they can receive a fixation pin.


As shown in FIGS. 6A and 7, the bone preparation guide can also include a spacer 188 extending downward from the body 154 and configured to be placed into a joint. In some embodiments, the spacer 188 is selectively engageable with the body. The spacer can have a first portion 190 configured to extend into a joint space and a second portion 192 engageable with the body 154. In the embodiment shown, the spacer can be received within opening 170, such that the spacer extends from the body in between the first and second guide surfaces. Such a spacer can be useful for positioning the body at a desired position with respect to a joint and for properly positioning the guide with respect to bones to be cut in more than one plane (e.g., three planes selected from more than one of a frontal plane, a transverse plane, and a sagittal plane). The distance between the spacer and the first guide surface can define a length of tissue removal (e.g., bone or cartilage to be cut) from a first bone, and the distance between the spacer and the second guide surface can define a length of tissue removal (e.g., bone or cartilage to be cut) from a second bone.


As shown in FIGS. 6A/B and 8, the bone preparation guide can also include a tissue removal location check member 194 engageable with the body 154 and configured to extend to a first bone and a second bone. The tissue removal location check member can have a first portion 196 configured to extend into contact with first and second bones and a second portion 198 engageable with the body. In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 6A and 8, the tissue removal location check member extends from the body at both the first and second guiding surfaces. In other embodiments, such as the embodiment shown in FIG. 6B, separate tissue removal location check members are provided for independent insertion into respective slots of the guide. Accordingly, embodiments of tissue removal location check members are useful for allowing a practitioner to see where a tissue removing instrument guided by the surfaces will contact the bone to be prepared.


Embodiments of the bone preparation guide can be useful in operation for guiding a preparation of a bone or bones at a targeted anatomy. Bone preparation can be useful, for instance, to facilitate contact between leading edges of adjacent bones, separated by a joint, or different portions of a single bone, separated by a fracture, such as in a bone alignment and/or fusion procedure.


Embodiments of the present invention also include methods for temporarily fixing an orientation of a bone or bones, for example, prior to or in conjunction with permanently fixing the orientation of the bone or bones. In general, the method of positioning a bone includes the steps of moving a bone from an anatomically misaligned position to an anatomically aligned position with respect to another bone and preparing an end of the moved bone and a facing end of another bone. In some embodiments, the end of at least one of the moved bone and the other bone is prepared after moving the bone into the aligned position. In certain embodiments, the bone is anatomically aligned in more than one plane with respect to another bone by applying a force to one bone at a single location, such that the bone both translates and rotates in response to the force. In certain embodiments, the moving step can be accomplished with a bone positioning device and/or the preparing step can be accomplished with a bone preparation guide, as described herein.



FIGS. 9A-B depict fontal views of a bone positioning guide 10 on a foot 200 having a first metatarsal 210, a medial cuneiform 220, a second metatarsal 292, and a third metatarsal 294. FIG. 9A depicts a foot 200 with an uncorrected bunion deformity, while FIG. 9B depicts the foot 200 with an alignment corrected by the bone positioning guide 10. Solid line L1 represents the starting location of the bone positioning guide 10 and dotted line L2 represents the finishing location of the bone positioning guide. As shown, as the bone positioning guide 10 is actuated it rotates with the first metatarsal 210 about an axis extending through the frontal plane as it pushes the first metatarsal 210 laterally in the transverse plane and plantarly in the sagittal plane. Accordingly, in this example, the position of the first metatarsal 210 is corrected with respect to the second metatarsal 292 generally in three planes by actuating a single bone positioning guide 10 to urge a bone engagement member 40 toward a tip 50. FIG. 10A shows a top view of a foot 200 with an uncorrected bunion deformity, while FIG. 10B shows a top view of the foot 200 with an alignment corrected by the bone positioning guide 10, emphasizing the rotational correction in the frontal plane and the lateral correction in the transverse plane.



FIGS. 11A-C show three sequential images of a bone positioning guide 10 on a foot 200 positioning a first metatarsal 210 with respect to a second metatarsal 292. FIG. 11A represents the beginning of the procedure, FIG. 11B the middle, and FIG. 11C the end. The orientation of the pins 270 is useful for visualizing the amount of rotation of the first metatarsal 210 in each image. With respect to FIGS. 11A-C, it can be seen the bone positioning guide 10 and the first metatarsal 210 are rotating in the frontal plane in response to actuation of bone positioning guide 10. Further, the angle between the first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 is reduced, as the space that can be seen between the first and second metatarsals in FIG. 11A is eliminated in FIG. 11C.


Each of the three potential planes of deformity will now be described in isolation. FIGS. 12A and 12B show frontal plane views of a foot 200. In FIG. 12A, the foot 200 is normal, while in FIG. 12B the foot is depicted with an uncorrected bunion deformity showing an isolated axial rotation of the first metatarsal 210. Solid line L3 indicates the alignment of the first metatarsal 210 relative to ground, while dotted line L4 in FIG. 12B indicates the extent of axial rotation in the frontal plane.



FIGS. 13A and 13B show transverse plane views of a foot 200. In FIG. 13A, the foot 200 is normal, while in FIG. 13B the foot is depicted with an uncorrected bunion deformity showing an isolated transverse plane first metatarsal 210 deviation. Solid line L5 indicates the alignment of the second metatarsal 292 and solid line L6 indicates the proper alignment of the first metatarsal 210 relative to the second metatarsal 292. The angle between these two lines forms the intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Dotted line L7 in FIG. 13B indicates the extent of transverse deviation.



FIGS. 14A and 14B show sagittal plane views of a foot 200. In FIG. 14A, the foot 200 is normal, while in FIG. 14B the foot is depicted with an uncorrected bunion deformity showing an isolated sagittal deviation of the first metatarsal 210. Solid line L8 indicates the proper alignment of the first metatarsal 210, while dotted line L9 in FIG. 14B indicates the extent of sagittal deviation.


A specific embodiment of a method in accordance with an embodiment of the invention includes the steps of engaging a bone engagement member with a first bone, placing a tip of the bone positioning guide in apposition to a second bone, the second bone being different from the first bone, and moving the bone engagement member with respect to the tip to change the position of the first bone with respect to the second bone in more than one plane. In some embodiments, after alignment, at least one of an end of the first bone and a facing end of a third bone are prepared (e.g., only the end of the first bone or both the end of the first bone and the end of the second bone), optionally using a preparation guide.


In some embodiments, the method includes the step of mobilizing a joint for a corrective procedure. For example, after creating surgical access to the joint and before moving the bones into an aligned position, tissue can be released to allow a bone, such as a metatarsal, to rotate freely. In some embodiments, obstructing bone may be excised (e.g., a dorsolateral flare of the metatarsal base, a plantar flare of the metatarsal base (sometimes referred to as a plantar condyle), part of an end of a metatarsal facing a cuneiform, or osteophyte) to further promote free rotation by creating relatively flat surfaces with respect to a frontal plane. An example of a dorsolateral flare F on a first metatarsal 210 of a foot 200 is shown in FIG. 15A. An example of a plantar flare PF on a first metatarsal 210 is shown in FIG. 15B. FIG. 15B also depicts a medial ridge MR, which, in some embodiments, can be engaged by the bone engaging member of a bone positioning guide.


Embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention can also include steps performed after preparing the ends of the bones. For example, the ends of the bones may be placed in apposition and optionally compressed together and the position of the bones can be fixed with one or more bone fixation devices (e.g., compressing bone screw, bone plate, bone staple, external fixator, intramedullary implant or nail) prior to a closing of the surgical access to the joint.


An exemplary method will now be described with respect to FIGS. 16-27 depicting a foot 200 having a first metatarsal 210, a medial cuneiform 220, and a second metatarsal 292. Note, unless otherwise indicated, the steps described need not be carried out in the order described.


After customary surgical preparation and access, a bone preparation instrument 296 can be inserted into the joint (e.g., first tarsal-metatarsal joint) to release soft tissues and/or excise the plantar flare from the base of the first metatarsal 210, as shown in FIG. 16. Excising the plantar flare may involve cutting plantar flare off the first metatarsal 210 so the face of the first metatarsal is generally planar. This step helps to mobilize the joint to facilitate a deformity correction. In some embodiments, the dorsal-lateral flare of the first metatarsal may also be excised to create space for the deformity correction (e.g., with respect to rotation of the first metatarsal). In certain embodiments, a portion of the metatarsal base facing the medial cuneiform can be removed during this mobilizing step.


An incision can be made and a tip 50 of a bone positioning guide 10 can be inserted on the lateral side of a metatarsal other than the first metatarsal 210, such as the second metatarsal 292. As shown in FIG. 17, the tip can be positioned proximally at a base of the second metatarsal 292 and a third metatarsal 294 interface. A surface of a bone engagement member 40 can be placed on the proximal portion of the first metatarsal 210. In some embodiments, the bone engagement member engages a medial ridge of the first metatarsal 210. As shown, the body 20 of the positioning guide can be generally perpendicular to the long axis of the second metatarsal 292.


As depicted in FIG. 18, the actuator 120 can be actuated to extend the shaft 30 to reduce the angle (transverse plane angle between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal) and rotate the first metatarsal about its axis (frontal plane axial rotation). The first metatarsal 210 can be properly positioned with respect to the medial cuneiform 220 by moving the bone engagement member 40 with respect to the tip 50. In some embodiments, such movement simultaneously pivots the first metatarsal with respect to the cuneiform and rotates the first metatarsal about its longitudinal axis into an anatomically correct position to correct a transverse plane deformity and a frontal plane deformity. In certain embodiments, body 20 rotates in a generally lateral direction during this step. In some embodiments, fixation pins (not shown in FIG. 18) can be inserted into the bones prior to the positioning step (e.g., freehand or using apertures in the guide as a template), and can be used to impart additional force (transverse, sagittal, and/or frontal plane rotational) to the first metatarsal 210, if desired. The bone positioning guide 10 can hold the desired position of the first metatarsal 210 with respect to the second metatarsal 292. After the desired correction is achieved, a fixation wire 298 can be inserted through a cannulation in the shaft 30 and driven into the first metatarsal 210 and the second metatarsal 292 to hold the corrected position.


As depicted in FIG. 19, a joint spacer 188 can be positioned within the joint between the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform.


As shown in FIG. 20, a bone preparation guide 150 can be placed over the joint spacer 188 and engaged with the joint spacer to set a position and orientation of the bone preparation guide relative to the joint. As shown, the bone preparation guide 150 can be positioned proximal to the bone positioning guide 10 in longitudinal alignment with the long axis of the first metatarsal 210 and the medial cuneiform 220, generally on the dorsal or dorsal-medial surface. In other embodiments, the spacer 188 is positioned after the guide 150 is provisionally placed on the bones. In yet other embodiments, bone preparation guide 150 and joint spacer 188 are placed simultaneously. In still other embodiments, bone preparation guide 150 is placed on the bones without using joint spacer 188 to aid with positioning.


As depicted in FIGS. 21A and 21B, one or more fixation pins 270 can be inserted into apertures of the bone preparation guide 150 to secure the guide to the first metatarsal 210 and the medial cuneiform 220. As shown, some pins 270 can be inserted at an angle or in a converging orientation to help prevent movement of the bone preparation guide 150 during a tissue removing step. As shown, two of the pins 270, one on the first metatarsal and one on the medial cuneiform, are parallel to allow the bone preparation guide 150 to be removed from the foot without removing all the pins. After insertion of the pins 270, the spacer 188 can optionally be removed in embodiments having a selectively engageable spacer (e.g., a joint spacer 188 that is physically removable from bone preparation guide 150).


In some embodiments, the location of the intersection of the tissue removing instrument and the bone to be prepared is confirmed before bone preparation. In one embodiment, a tissue removing instrument location check member can be engaged with the preparation guide to visually confirm where a tissue removal instrument will contact the bone. In another embodiment, a tissue removal instrument is engaged with the preparation guide to visually confirm where the instrument will contact the bone. In either embodiment, such visual confirmation can include the use of an imaging device, such as an X-ray. If the position of the preparation guide is correct, additional fixation pins may be inserted through the apertures (e.g., angled apertures) to further fix the position of the preparation guide with respect to the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform. In some embodiments, the spacer is reattached prior to further bone preparation steps.


In some embodiments, the end of the first metatarsal 210 facing the medial cuneiform 220 can be prepared with a tissue removing instrument 296 guided by a guide surface of bone preparation guide 150 (e.g., inserted through a slot defined by a first guide surface and a first facing surface). In some embodiments, the first metatarsal 210 end preparation is done after the alignment of the bones, e.g., by actuating bone positioning guide 10 before preparing the end of first metatarsal 210. In other embodiments, the first metatarsal 210 end preparation is done before the alignment of the bones, e.g., by preparing the end of the first metatarsal 210 before actuating bone positioning guide 10.


In addition, as shown in FIG. 22, the end of the medial cuneiform 220 facing the first metatarsal 210 can be prepared with the tissue removing instrument 296 guided by a guide surface of bone preparation guide 150 (e.g., inserted through a slot defined by a second guide surface and a second facing surface). In some embodiments, the medial cuneiform 220 end preparation is done after the alignment of the bones. In yet other embodiments, the medial cuneiform 220 end preparation is done before the alignment of the bones. In embodiments that include cutting bone or cartilage, the cuneiform cut and the metatarsal cut can be parallel, conforming cuts. In the specific embodiment shown in FIG. 22, a saw blade can be inserted through a first slot to cut a portion of the medial cuneiform and the saw blade can be inserted through a second slot to cut a portion of the first metatarsal (e.g., in some embodiments the medial cuneiform can be cut before the first metatarsal). Accordingly, in the embodiment shown, the cuts to both the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform were preformed after the first metatarsal was positioned.


Any angled/converging pins can be removed and the bone preparation guide 150 can be lifted off the parallel pins 270, as shown in FIG. 23. The parallel pins can be referred to as “reference pins” which can serve as a reference in later steps to ensure that the corrected alignment of the first metatarsal 210 has been maintained. The joint spacer can also be removed before, after, or simultaneously with the bone preparation guide. In some embodiments, the bone positioning guide 10 is also removed from the foot.


The tissue (e.g., bone or cartilage slices) from the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform can be removed from the joint site and the joint surfaces can be fenestrated, if desired. If the bone positioning guide was taken off the foot, it can be put back on, as shown in FIG. 24, before the additional steps discussed below.


After preparation, the ends of the two bones can be placed in apposition and optionally compressed together by provisionally fixating the joint. For example, the two bones may be placed in apposition by placing the cut end of the first metatarsal 210 in abutment with the cut end of the medial cuneiform 220. In some examples, the cut end of the first metatarsal 210 is placed adjacent to, and optionally in contact with, the cut end of the medial cuneiform 220.


As shown in FIG. 25, a compression pin, such as a threaded olive pin 300 can be inserted through the first metatarsal 210 and into the medial cuneiform 220 to provide compression and provisional fixation between the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform. Additional compression pins can be inserted to provide additional stability. As shown, the parallel reference pins should be aligned during this step. In some embodiments, a practitioner checks for alignment of the parallel reference pins prior to insertion of the compression pin, and, if they are not aligned, adjusts the position of the first metatarsal until desired alignment is achieved.


Although they can be left in place, in some embodiments the parallel reference pins and bone positioning guide can be removed and a bone fixation device (e.g., two bone plates positioned in different planes, as shown) can be applied to stabilize the joint for fusion. FIG. 26A shows a first bone plate 310 positioned on a dorsal-medial side of the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform and a second bone plate 320 positioned on a medial-plantar side of the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform. In other embodiments, such as the embodiment shown in FIG. 26B, the second bone plate 320 can be a helical bone plate positioned from a medial side of the cuneiform to a plantar side of the first metatarsal across the joint space. The plates can be applied with the insertion of bone screws.


As shown in FIG. 27, the compression pin can be removed and the incision can be closed.



FIGS. 28 A/B and 29 A/B include examples of anatomically misaligned metatarsals and metatarsals that have been anatomically aligned using methods and/or instruments in accordance with the invention. FIG. 28A shows a left foot pre-operation and post-operation, while FIG. 28B shows a right foot pre-operation and post-operation. As can be seen from a comparison of the pre-operative images to the post-operative images, the patients' intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was significantly reduced. FIGS. 29A and 29B show the correction of an axial rotation in a frontal rotational plane. FIG. 29 A shows a pre-operative image and a post-operative image of a right foot. Drawings of a metatarsal 210 are also provided to illustrate the rotation. The rotation of the metatarsal can be seen by the position of sesamoid bones 400, which are depicted as having been rotated under the first metatarsal 210 in the post-operative drawing. FIG. 29B shows pre-operative views of a left foot 200 and a right foot 200. Again, by comparing the location of the sesamoid bones 400 with respect to a reference location, such as ground, the planter surface of the foot, and/or a cuneiform, it can be seen this patient's metatarsal is rotated out of alignment.


Methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be useful for temporarily positioning a bone or bones. Bone positioning can be useful, for instance, to correct an anatomical misalignment of bones and temporarily maintain an anatomically aligned position, such as in a bone alignment and/or fusion procedure. In some embodiments, an “anatomically aligned position” means that an angle of a long axis of a first metatarsal relative to a long axis of a second metatarsal is about 10 degrees or less in the transverse plane or sagittal plane. In certain embodiments, anatomical misalignment can be corrected in both the transverse plane and the frontal plane. In the transverse plane, a normal intermetatarsal angle (“IMA”) between a first metatarsal and a second metatarsal is less than about 9 degrees. An IMA of between about 9 degrees and about 13 degrees is considered a mild misalignment of the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. An IMA of greater than about 16 degrees is considered a severe misalignment of the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. In some embodiments, methods in accordance with the invention are capable of anatomically aligning the bone(s) by reducing the IMA from over 10 degrees to about 10 degrees or less (e.g., to an IMA of about 1-5 degrees), including to negative angles of about −5 degrees or until interference with the second metatarsal, by positioning the first metatarsal at a different angle with respect to the second metatarsal.


With respect to the frontal plane, a normal first metatarsal will be positioned such that its crista prominence is generally perpendicular to the ground and/or its sesamoid bones are generally parallel to the ground and positioned under the metatarsal. This position can be defined as a metatarsal rotation of 0 degrees. In a misaligned first metatarsal, the metatarsal is axially rotated between about 4 degrees to about 30 degrees or more. In some embodiments, methods in accordance with the invention are capable of anatomically aligning the metatarsal by reducing the metatarsal rotation from about 4 degrees or more to less than 4 degrees (e.g., to about 0 to 2 degrees) by rotating the metatarsal with respect to the medial cuneiform.


While various embodiments of bone positioning and preparing guide systems and methods have been described, is should be appreciated that the concepts of the disclosure can be altered in practice, e.g., based on the needs of the clinician, the patient undergoing the bone repositioning procedure, the specific anatomy being treated, and/or the target clinical outcome. As one example, the described systems and techniques may be modified to utilize a fulcrum about which rotation and/or pivoting of one bone relative to another bone occurs via bone positioning guide 10. The fulcrum can establish and/or maintain space between adjacent bones being compressed between bone engagement member 40 and tip 50 of bone positioning guide 10, preventing lateral translation or base shift of the bones during rotation and pivoting.



FIG. 30A illustrates a portion of a foot having a bunion caused by a misaligned first metatarsal 210 relative to second metatarsal 292. FIG. 30B shows the foot of FIG. 30A after being anatomically aligned to correct the misalignment using bone positioning guide 10. As shown, first metatarsal 210 has been rotated counterclockwise in the frontal plane (from the perspective of a patient, clockwise from the perspective of a frontal observer) and also pivoted in the transverse plane (e.g., such that the angle 350 between the first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 is reduced). Rotation and pivoting of first metatarsal 210 can cause the base 352 of first metatarsal 210 to shift relative to medial cuneiform 220. In general, it is desirable that the offset 354A between first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 220 be reduced to zero (e.g., such that there is substantially no offset) after rotation and pivoting. As shown in the illustrated application of FIG. 30B, however, the base 352 of first metatarsal 210 abutting medial cuneiform 220 has shifted toward second metatarsal 292. This results in a transverse offset 354B of first metatarsal 210 toward second metatarsal 292, causing base compression between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292.


To help avoid the base shift and offset 354B observed in FIG. 30B, a clinician can insert a fulcrum in the notch between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 at the base of the metatarsals (e.g., adjacent respective cuneiform) before actuating bone positioning guide 10. The fulcrum can provide a point about which first metatarsal 210 can rotate and/or pivot while helping minimize or avoid base compression between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. In addition, use of the fulcrum may cause first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 220 to be better angled relative to the guide slots of bone preparation guide 150 (once installed), providing a better cut angle through the guide slots then without use of the fulcrum. This can help reduce or eliminate unwanted spring-back, or return positioning, of first metatarsal 210 after removing bone positioning guide 10.



FIG. 31 illustrates a bone positioning operation in which a fulcrum 356 is positioned at an intersection between a first bone and a second bone, where the first bone is being realigned relative to the second bone. In particular, FIG. 31 illustrates fulcrum 356 being positioned between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292. Fulcrum 356 may be positioned distally of bone preparation guide 150 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 as shown in FIG. 31 or, in other applications, proximally of the guide (e.g., at the ends of the first and second metatarsals abutting the medial and intermediate cuneiform bones, respectively).


When used, the clinician can insert fulcrum 356 between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 (or other adjacent bones, when not performing a metatarsal realignment) at any time prior to actuating bone positioning guide 10. In different embodiments, fulcrum 356 can be inserted between first metatarsal 210 and second metatarsal 292 before or after inserting joint spacer 188 and/or placing bone preparation guide 150 over the joint being operated upon. In one embodiment, the clinician prepares the joint being operated upon to release soft tissues and/or excise the plantar flare from the base of the first metatarsal 210, as discussed above. Either before or after installing bone positioning guide 10 over adjacent bones, for example with bone engagement member 40 positioned in contact with the medial ridge of the first metatarsal 210 and tip 50 positioned in contact with second metatarsal 292, the clinician inserts fulcrum 356 at the joint between the first metatarsal and the second metatarsal. The clinician can subsequently actuate bone positioning guide 10 (e.g., rotate knob 120). In the case of a left foot as shown in FIG. 31, actuation of bone positioning guide 10 causes the first metatarsal 210 to rotate counterclockwise in the frontal plane (from the perspective of a patient) and also pivot in the transverse plane about the fulcrum. In the case of a right foot (not shown), actuation causes the first metatarsal to rotate clockwise in the frontal plane (from the perspective of a patient) and also pivot in the transverse plane about the fulcrum. Thus, for both feet, actuation of bone positioning guide 10 can supinate the first metatarsal in the frontal plane and pivot the first metatarsal in the transverse plane about fulcrum 356. While use of fulcrum 356 can minimize or eliminate base compression between adjacent bones being operated upon, in other embodiments as discussed above, the described systems and techniques can be implemented without using the fulcrum.


In instances in which fulcrum 356 is used, any suitable mechanical instrument can be used for the fulcrum. FIG. 32 is a perspective view of one example instrument that can be used as fulcrum 356. In this embodiment, fulcrum 356 has a generally rectangular shape and tapers in thickness along at least a portion of the length from the trailing end 358 to the leading end 360. Fulcrum 356 may be sized sufficiently small so that it does not interfere with placement of bone preparation guide 150 on the joint being worked upon. In some embodiments, the clinician is provided a system containing multiple different size fulcrums and allowed to choose the specific sized fulcrum desired for the specific procedure being performed. FIG. 33 illustrates an example kit or system of different sized fulcrums, labeled with exemplary “width×thickness” sizes, that may be provided to a clinician in such an embodiment. In some examples, fulcrum 356 has a width ranging from 5 millimeters to 15 millimeters (e.g., about 6 millimeters to about 10 millimeters) and a thickness ranging 1 millimeter to 12 millimeters (e.g., about 2 millimeters to about 3 millimeters), although fulcrums with different dimensions can be used. While FIGS. 32 and 33 illustrate one example style of fulcrum, other mechanical instruments providing a fulcrum functionality can be used without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For instance, as alternative examples, a surgical pin or screw driver head may be used as fulcrum 356.


As discussed above, bone positioning guide 10 can have a variety of different configurations, including a configuration in which bone engagement member 40 is laterally offset from tip 50. FIG. 34 is a perspective view of bone positioning guide 10 showing an example arrangement in which bone engagement member 40 is laterally offset from tip 50. In this embodiment, the first end 60 of main body member 20 is laterally offset from an axis 362 extending through shaft 30 and a geometric center of bone engagement member 40. In particular, in the illustrated configuration, tip 50 is offset laterally in the direction of the cuneiform relative to bone engagement member 40. As a result, when bone positioning guide 10 is actuated, e.g., by rotating knob 120, a moment can be created by the offset tip. This can cause the end of the first metatarsal 210 adjacent the proximal phalange to pivot toward the second metatarsal 292 and close angle 350, e.g., while the opposite end of the first metatarsal adjacent the medial cuneiform pivots away from the second metatarsal. This can also help avoid base compression between the first and second metatarsals.


As discussed above with respect to FIGS. 19 and 20, a joint spacer 188 can be positioned in a joint between a first metatarsal and a medial cuneiform before placing bone preparation guide 150 over the joint spacer. Bone preparation guide 150 can have an opening 170 (FIG. 5) sized to receive joint spacer 188. In some examples, opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 is size and/or shaped indexed to joint spacer 188 such that there is substantially no, or no, relative movement between the guide and spacer (once bone preparation guide 150 is placed over joint spacer 188). This arrangement can ensure that bone preparation guide 150 is positioned precisely at the location where guided by joint spacer 188.


In practice, once bone preparation guide 150 is placed over joint spacer 188, the guide slots of the bone preparation guide may not be perfectly aligned with the ends of the bones (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 220) to be cut through the guide slots. Accordingly, in other configurations, opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 may not be sized and/or shaped and/or indexed to joint spacer 188. In other words, opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 may have a different cross-sectional size and/or shape than the cross-sectional size and/or shape of joint spacer 188. In these configurations, bone preparation guide 150 may actuate or rotate about an axis extending through the length of joint spacer 188. As a result, after the clinician places bone preparation guide 150 over joint spacer 188, the clinician may rotate bone preparation guide 150 around joint spacer 188 until the guide slots of the bone preparation guide are better aligned with the ends of the bones to be cut (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 220). Depending on the configuration of opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 and the configuration of joint spacer 188, the guide may rotate freely (e.g., 360 degrees) around the joint seeker or within a bounded angular range (e.g., from plus 20 degrees to minus 20 degrees from a normal position).



FIG. 35 illustrates one example configuration of a joint spacer 188 that can allow bone preparation guide 150 to rotate around the seeker. As shown in the illustrated example, joint spacer 188 has a proximal portion 370 having a cylindrical cross-section and a distal portion 372 having a rectangular cross-section. A leading edge of the distal portion 372 is insertable into the joint between the first metatarsal 210 and the medial cuneiform 220. Once bone preparation guide 150 is inserted over joint spacer 188, body 154 of the guide (FIG. 5) may be positioned about the proximal portion 370. This can allow the guide to be rotated around the proximal portion.


In other configurations, opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 may be size and/or shape indexed to the cross-sectional size and/or shape of joint spacer 188 but still provide relative rotation between the two components. For example, opening 170 may have a circular cross-section sized and shaped to receive proximal portion 370 of joint spacer 188 from FIG. 35. Because both opening 170 of bone preparation guide 150 and proximal portion 370 of joint spacer 188 have circular cross-sections in such an embodiment, the two components may rotate relative to each other. FIG. 36A is a perspective view of an example configuration of bone preparation guide 150 having an opening 170 with circular cross-sectional shape. FIG. 36B is a perspective view of the example bone preparation guide of FIG. 36A shown with joint spacer 188 from FIG. 35 inserted into the guide.


In embodiments where bone preparation guide 150 can rotate relative to joint spacer 188, the bone positioning guide and/or joint spacer may include a locking mechanism that is engageable to lock the rotational angle of the bone preparation guide relative to the joint spacer. For example, bone preparation guide 150 may include a set screw with thumb wheel that can be rotated, causing a distal end of the set screw to bear against or retract away from joint spacer 188. In use, a clinician can rotate bone preparation guide 150 around joint spacer 188 until the guide slots of the bone preparation guide are best aligned with the ends of the bones to be cut (e.g., first metatarsal 210 and medial cuneiform 220). The clinician can then engage the locking mechanism to prevent further rotation of bone preparation guide 150 relative to joint spacer 188 before performing further steps of the procedure.


Embodiments of the invention also include a disposable, sterile kit that includes an embodiment of a bone positioning guide and/or preparation guide described herein. Other components that may be included within the sterile kit include bone fixation devices.


Thus, embodiments of the invention are disclosed. Although the present invention has been described with reference to certain disclosed embodiments, the disclosed embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration, and not limitation, and other embodiments of the invention are possible. One skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes, adaptations, and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A metatarsal correction system comprising: a bone preparation guide comprising a body defining a guide surface configured to be positioned over an end of a bone, the guide surface being configured to guide a tissue removing instrument for cutting the end of the bone, wherein the bone is at least one of a first metatarsal and a medial cuneiform;a bone positioning guide positionable on a medial side of the first metatarsal and on a lateral side of a metatarsal other than the first metatarsal, the bone positioning guide comprising a mechanism that is operable to move the first metatarsal in at least a transverse plane to close an intermetatarsal angle between the first metatarsal and a second metatarsal; andat least one fixation device positionable across a tarsal-metatarsal joint separating the first metatarsal from the medial cuneiform, the at least one fixation device being configured to fixate a moved position of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform for fusion.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the mechanism comprises at least one of a ratchet and a threaded shaft.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the bone positioning guide comprises a bone engagement member positionable on the medial side of the first metatarsal and a tip positionable on the lateral side of the metatarsal other than the first metatarsal, and the mechanism is operable to move the bone engagement member and the tip toward each other.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the bone engagement member comprises a cannulation configured to receive a fixation wire through the cannulation to fix the bone engagement member relative to the first metatarsal.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the metatarsal other than the first metatarsal is the second metatarsal.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the bone positioning guide is configured to extend in a medial-to-lateral direction across a dorsal surface of the first metatarsal and across the dorsal surface of the second metatarsal.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the bone is the first metatarsal.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the guide surface comprises a first guide surface and a second guide surface, the first guide surface being configured to be positioned over the first metatarsal, the second guide surface being configured to be positioned over the medial cuneiform, and the first and second guide surfaces being spaced from each other by a distance configured to cross the tarsal-metatarsal joint.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the body extends from a first end configured to be positioned over the first metatarsal to a second end configured to be positioned over the medial cuneiform, the body including a first fixation aperture configured to receive a fixation pin for securing the body to the first metatarsal and a second fixation aperture configured to receive a fixation pin for securing the body to the medial cuneiform.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the first fixation aperture and the second fixation aperture are parallel to each other.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the body further comprises a third fixation aperture that is skewed relative to the first fixation aperture and the second fixation aperture.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the bone preparation guide further comprises a facing surface spaced from the guide surface to define a guide slot.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the bone preparation guide further comprises a spacer extending downwardly from the body and configured to be placed into the tarsal-metatarsal joint.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the body defines an opening and the spacer is selectively engageable with the body through the opening.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, further comprising the tissue removing instrument, wherein the tissue removing instrument comprises a saw.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one fixation device comprises a least one of a pin, a screw, a plate, and a staple.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, further comprising a sterile kit containing at least the bone preparation guide and the bone positioning guide.
  • 18. A metatarsal correction system comprising: a bone preparation guide comprising a body defining at least one cutting slot configured to be positioned over a bone to be cut, wherein the bone is at least one of a first metatarsal and a medial cuneiform;a bone positioning guide comprising a bone engagement member positionable on a medial side of the first metatarsal and a tip positionable on a lateral side of a second metatarsal, the tip being positionable in an intermetatarsal space between the second metatarsal and a third metatarsal, wherein the bone positioning guide further comprising a mechanism operable to move the bone engagement member and the tip toward each other; andat least one fixation device positionable across a tarsal-metatarsal joint separating the first metatarsal from the medial cuneiform, the at least one fixation device being configured to fixate a moved position of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform for fusion.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the mechanism comprises at least one of a ratchet and a threaded shaft.
  • 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the bone engagement member comprises a cannulation configured to receive a fixation wire through the cannulation to fix the bone engagement member relative to the first metatarsal.
  • 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the bone is the first metatarsal.
  • 22. The system of claim 18, wherein the at least one cutting slot comprises at least one metatarsal-side cutting slot positionable over the first metatarsal and at least one cuneiform-side cutting slot positionable over the medial cuneiform.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the at least one metatarsal-side cutting slot is skewed relative to the at least one cuneiform-side cutting slot.
  • 24. The system of claim 18, wherein the body extends from a first end configured to be positioned over the first metatarsal to a second end configured to be positioned over the medial cuneiform, the body including a first fixation aperture configured to receive a fixation pin for securing the body to the first metatarsal and the second fixation aperture configured to receive a fixation pin for securing the body to the medial cuneiform.
  • 25. The system of claim 18, wherein the bone preparation guide further comprises a spacer extending downwardly from the body and configured to be placed into the tarsal-metatarsal joint.
  • 26. The system of claim 18, wherein the at least one fixation device comprises a least one of a pin, a screw, a plate, and a staple.
  • 27. A metatarsal correction system comprising: means for guiding a tissue removing instrument for cutting at least one of a proximal end of a first metatarsal and a distal end of a medial cuneiform, the proximal end of the first metatarsal being separated from the distal end of the medial cuneiform by a tarsal-metatarsal joint;means for moving the first metatarsal in at least a transverse plane to close an intermetatarsal angle between the first metatarsal and a second metatarsal;means for moving the first metatarsal in at least a frontal plane to adjust a frontal plane position of the first metatarsal; andmeans for fixating a moved position of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform.
  • 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the means for guiding the tissue removing instrument comprises means for guiding the tissue removing instrument for cutting both the proximal end of the first metatarsal and the distal end of the medial cuneiform.
  • 29. The system of claim 27, wherein the means for moving the first metatarsal in at least the transverse plane comprises the means for moving the first metatarsal in at least the frontal plane.
  • 30. The system of claim 27, wherein the means for fixating the moved position of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform comprises at least a plate.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/353,431, filed Jun. 21, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/998,155, filed Aug. 20, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,039,873, issued Jun. 22, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/031,855, filed Jul. 10, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,849,670, issued Dec. 1, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/452,236, filed Mar. 7, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,045,807, issued Aug. 14, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/981,335, filed Dec. 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,622,805, issued Apr. 18, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/205,338, filed Aug. 14, 2015. The entire contents of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (394)
Number Name Date Kind
3664022 Small May 1972 A
4069824 Weinstock Jan 1978 A
4159716 Borchers Jul 1979 A
4187840 Watanabe Feb 1980 A
4335715 Kirkley Jun 1982 A
4338927 Volkov et al. Jul 1982 A
4349018 Chambers Sep 1982 A
4409973 Neufeld Oct 1983 A
4440168 Warren Apr 1984 A
4501268 Comparetto Feb 1985 A
4502474 Comparetto Mar 1985 A
4509511 Neufeld Apr 1985 A
4565191 Slocum Jan 1986 A
4570624 Wu Feb 1986 A
4627425 Reese Dec 1986 A
4628919 Clybum Dec 1986 A
4632102 Comparetto Dec 1986 A
4664102 Comparetto May 1987 A
4708133 Comparetto Nov 1987 A
4736737 Fargie et al. Apr 1988 A
4750481 Reese Jun 1988 A
4754746 Cox Jul 1988 A
4757810 Reese Jul 1988 A
4895141 Koeneman et al. Jan 1990 A
4952214 Comparetto Aug 1990 A
4959066 Dunn et al. Sep 1990 A
4978347 Ilizarov Dec 1990 A
4988349 Pennig Jan 1991 A
4995875 Coes Feb 1991 A
5021056 Hofmann et al. Jun 1991 A
5035698 Comparetto Jul 1991 A
5042983 Rayhack Aug 1991 A
5049149 Schmidt Sep 1991 A
5053039 Hofmann et al. Oct 1991 A
5078719 Schreiber Jan 1992 A
5112334 Alchermes et al. May 1992 A
5147364 Comparetto Sep 1992 A
5176685 Rayhack Jan 1993 A
5207676 Canadell et al. May 1993 A
5246444 Schreiber Sep 1993 A
5254119 Schreiber Oct 1993 A
5312412 Whipple May 1994 A
5358504 Paley et al. Oct 1994 A
5364402 Mumme et al. Nov 1994 A
5374271 Hwang Dec 1994 A
5413579 Du Toit May 1995 A
5417694 Marik et al. May 1995 A
5449360 Schreiber Sep 1995 A
5470335 Du Toit Nov 1995 A
5490854 Fisher et al. Feb 1996 A
5529075 Clark Jun 1996 A
5540695 Levy Jul 1996 A
5578038 Slocum Nov 1996 A
5586564 Barrett et al. Dec 1996 A
5601565 Huebner Feb 1997 A
5613969 Jenkins, Jr. Mar 1997 A
5620442 Bailey et al. Apr 1997 A
5620448 Puddu Apr 1997 A
5643270 Combs Jul 1997 A
5667510 Combs Sep 1997 A
H1706 Mason Jan 1998 H
5722978 Jenkins Mar 1998 A
5749875 Puddu May 1998 A
5779709 Harris et al. Jul 1998 A
5788695 Richardson Aug 1998 A
5803924 Oni et al. Sep 1998 A
5810822 Mortier Sep 1998 A
5843085 Graser Dec 1998 A
5893553 Pinkous Apr 1999 A
5911724 Wehrli Jun 1999 A
5935128 Carter et al. Aug 1999 A
5941877 Viegas et al. Aug 1999 A
5951556 Faccioli et al. Sep 1999 A
5980526 Johnson et al. Nov 1999 A
5984931 Greenfield Nov 1999 A
6007535 Rayhack et al. Dec 1999 A
6027504 McGuire Feb 2000 A
6030391 Brainard et al. Feb 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6171309 Huebner Jan 2001 B1
6203545 Stoffella Mar 2001 B1
6248109 Stoffella Jun 2001 B1
6391031 Toomey May 2002 B1
6478799 Williamson Nov 2002 B1
6511481 von Hoffmann et al. Jan 2003 B2
6547793 McGuire Apr 2003 B1
6676662 Bagga et al. Jan 2004 B1
6719773 Boucher et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743233 Baldwin et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755838 Trnka Jun 2004 B2
6796986 Duffner Sep 2004 B2
6859661 Tuke Feb 2005 B2
7018383 McGuire Mar 2006 B2
7033361 Collazo Apr 2006 B2
7097647 Segler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7112204 Justin et al. Sep 2006 B2
7153310 Ralph et al. Dec 2006 B2
7182766 Mogul Feb 2007 B1
7241298 Nemec et al. Jul 2007 B2
7282054 Steflensmeier et al. Oct 2007 B2
7377924 Raistrick et al. May 2008 B2
7465303 Riccione et al. Dec 2008 B2
7540874 Trumble et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572258 Stiernborg Aug 2009 B2
7641660 Lakin et al. Jan 2010 B2
D610257 Horton Feb 2010 S
7686811 Byrd et al. Mar 2010 B2
7691108 Lavallee Apr 2010 B2
7763026 Egger et al. Jul 2010 B2
D629900 Fisher Dec 2010 S
7967823 Ammann et al. Jun 2011 B2
7972338 O'Brien Jul 2011 B2
D646389 Claypool et al. Oct 2011 S
8057478 Kuczynski et al. Nov 2011 B2
8062301 Ammann et al. Nov 2011 B2
D651315 Bertoni et al. Dec 2011 S
D651316 May et al. Dec 2011 S
8080010 Schulz et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080045 Wotton, III Dec 2011 B2
8083746 Novak Dec 2011 B2
8123753 Poncet Feb 2012 B2
8137406 Novak et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147530 Strnad et al. Apr 2012 B2
8167918 Strnad et al. May 2012 B2
8172848 Tomko et al. May 2012 B2
8192441 Collazo Jun 2012 B2
8197487 Poncet et al. Jun 2012 B2
8231623 Jordan Jul 2012 B1
8231663 Kay et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236000 Ammann et al. Aug 2012 B2
8246561 Agee et al. Aug 2012 B1
D666721 Wright et al. Sep 2012 S
8262664 Justin et al. Sep 2012 B2
8277459 Sand et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282644 Edwards Oct 2012 B2
8282645 Lawrence et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292966 Morton Oct 2012 B2
8303596 Plassky et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313492 Wong et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323289 Re Dec 2012 B2
8337503 Lian Dec 2012 B2
8343159 Bennett Jan 2013 B2
8377105 Buescher Feb 2013 B2
D679395 Wright et al. Apr 2013 S
8409209 Ammann et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435246 Fisher et al. May 2013 B2
8475462 Thomas et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8523870 Green, II et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529571 Horan et al. Sep 2013 B2
8540777 Ammann et al. Sep 2013 B2
8545508 Collazo Oct 2013 B2
D694884 Mooradian et al. Dec 2013 S
D695402 Dacosta et al. Dec 2013 S
8652142 Geissler Feb 2014 B2
8657820 Kubiak et al. Feb 2014 B2
D701303 Cook Mar 2014 S
8672945 Lavallee et al. Mar 2014 B2
8696716 Kartalian et al. Apr 2014 B2
8702715 Ammann et al. Apr 2014 B2
D705929 Frey May 2014 S
8715363 Ratron et al. May 2014 B2
8728084 Berelsman et al. May 2014 B2
8758354 Habegger et al. Jun 2014 B2
8764760 Metzger et al. Jul 2014 B2
8764763 Wong et al. Jul 2014 B2
8771279 Philippon et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777948 Bernsteiner Jul 2014 B2
8784427 Fallin et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784457 Graham Jul 2014 B2
8795286 Sand et al. Aug 2014 B2
8801727 Chan et al. Aug 2014 B2
8808303 Stemniski et al. Aug 2014 B2
8828012 May et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858602 Weiner et al. Oct 2014 B2
8882778 Ranft Nov 2014 B2
8882816 Kartalian et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888785 Ammann et al. Nov 2014 B2
D720456 Dacosta et al. Dec 2014 S
8900247 Tseng et al. Dec 2014 B2
8906026 Ammann et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945132 Plassy et al. Feb 2015 B2
8998903 Price et al. Apr 2015 B2
8998904 Zeetser et al. Apr 2015 B2
9023052 Lietz et al. May 2015 B2
9044250 Olsen et al. Jun 2015 B2
9060822 Lewis et al. Jun 2015 B2
9089376 Medoff et al. Jul 2015 B2
9101421 Blacklidge Aug 2015 B2
9107715 Blitz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9113920 Ammann et al. Aug 2015 B2
D740424 Dacosta et al. Oct 2015 S
D765844 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766434 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766437 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766438 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
D766439 DaCosta Sep 2016 S
9452057 Dacosta et al. Sep 2016 B2
9522023 Haddad et al. Nov 2016 B2
9750538 Soffiatti et al. Sep 2017 B2
9785747 Geebelen Oct 2017 B2
9980760 Dacosta et al. May 2018 B2
10028750 Rose Jul 2018 B2
10064631 Dacosta et al. Sep 2018 B2
10159499 Dacosta et al. Dec 2018 B2
10292713 Fallin et al. May 2019 B2
10327829 Dacosta et al. Jun 2019 B2
10342590 Bays Jul 2019 B2
10376268 Fallin et al. Aug 2019 B2
10470779 Fallin et al. Nov 2019 B2
10779867 Penzimer et al. Sep 2020 B2
11039873 Santrock Jun 2021 B2
11116558 Smith Sep 2021 B2
11278337 Bays Mar 2022 B2
11304705 Fallin et al. Apr 2022 B2
20020099381 Maroney Jul 2002 A1
20020107519 Dixon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020165552 Duffner Nov 2002 A1
20020198531 Millard et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040010259 Keller et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040039394 Conti et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040097946 Dietzel et al. May 2004 A1
20040138669 Horn Jul 2004 A1
20050004676 Schon et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050059978 Sherry et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070909 Egger et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075641 Singhatat et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101961 Huebner et al. May 2005 A1
20050149042 Metzger Jul 2005 A1
20050228389 Stiernborg Oct 2005 A1
20050251147 Novak Nov 2005 A1
20050267482 Hyde Dec 2005 A1
20050273112 McNamara Dec 2005 A1
20060129163 McGuire Jun 2006 A1
20060206044 Simon Sep 2006 A1
20060217733 Plassky et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060229621 Cadmus Oct 2006 A1
20060241607 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241608 Myerson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060264961 Murray-Brown Nov 2006 A1
20070010818 Stone et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070123857 Deffenbaugh et al. May 2007 A1
20070233138 Figueroa et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070265634 Weinstein Nov 2007 A1
20070276383 Rayhack Nov 2007 A1
20080009863 Bond et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015603 Collazo Jan 2008 A1
20080039850 Rowley et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080091197 Coughlin Apr 2008 A1
20080140081 Heavener et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147073 Ammann et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172054 Claypool et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195215 Morton Aug 2008 A1
20080208252 Holmes Aug 2008 A1
20080262500 Collazo Oct 2008 A1
20080269908 Warburton Oct 2008 A1
20080288004 Schendel Nov 2008 A1
20090036893 Kartalian et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036931 Pech et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054899 Ammann et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090093849 Grabowski Apr 2009 A1
20090105767 Reiley Apr 2009 A1
20090118733 Orsak et al. May 2009 A1
20090198244 Leibel Aug 2009 A1
20090198279 Zhang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090222047 Graham Sep 2009 A1
20090254092 Albiol Llorach Oct 2009 A1
20090254126 Orbay et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090287309 Walch et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100069910 Hasselman Mar 2010 A1
20100121334 Couture et al. May 2010 A1
20100130981 Richards May 2010 A1
20100152782 Stone et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168799 Schumer Jul 2010 A1
20100185245 Paul et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100249779 Hotchkiss et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256687 Neufeld et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318088 Warne et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324556 Tyber et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110009865 Drfaly Jan 2011 A1
20110077656 Sand Mar 2011 A1
20110093084 Morton Apr 2011 A1
20110118739 Tyber et al. May 2011 A1
20110178524 Lawrence Jul 2011 A1
20110245835 Dodds et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110288550 Orbay et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301648 Lofthouse et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016426 Robinson Jan 2012 A1
20120065689 Prasad et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120078258 Lo et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120123420 Honiball May 2012 A1
20120123484 Lietz et al. May 2012 A1
20120130376 Loring et al. May 2012 A1
20120130382 Iannotti et al. May 2012 A1
20120130383 Budoff May 2012 A1
20120184961 Johannaber Jul 2012 A1
20120185056 Warburton Jul 2012 A1
20120191199 Raemisch Jul 2012 A1
20120239045 Li Sep 2012 A1
20120253350 Anthony et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120265301 Demers et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120277745 Lizee Nov 2012 A1
20120303033 Weiner et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330135 Millahn et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130012949 Fallin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130035694 Grimm et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130085499 Lian Apr 2013 A1
20130085502 Harrold Apr 2013 A1
20130096563 Meade et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130131821 Cachia May 2013 A1
20130150900 Haddad et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130150903 Vincent Jun 2013 A1
20130158556 Jones et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165936 Myers Jun 2013 A1
20130165938 Chow et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130172942 Lewis et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130184714 Kaneyama et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190765 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190766 Harris et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130204259 Zajac Aug 2013 A1
20130226248 Hatch et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130226252 Mayer Aug 2013 A1
20130231668 Olsen et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130237987 Graham Sep 2013 A1
20130237989 Bonutti Sep 2013 A1
20130267956 Terrill et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130310836 Raub et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325019 Thomas et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325076 Palmer et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130331845 Horan et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130338785 Wong Dec 2013 A1
20140005672 Edwards et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025127 Richter Jan 2014 A1
20140039501 Schickendantz et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140039561 Weiner et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046387 Waizenegger Feb 2014 A1
20140074099 Vigneron et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140074101 Collazo Mar 2014 A1
20140094861 Fallin Apr 2014 A1
20140094924 Hacking et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140135775 Maxson et al. May 2014 A1
20140163563 Reynolds et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140171953 Gonzalvez et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180342 Lowery et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140188139 Fallin et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140194884 Martin et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140194999 Orbay et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140207144 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140249537 Wong et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257308 Johannaber Sep 2014 A1
20140257509 Dacosta et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140276815 Riccione Sep 2014 A1
20140276853 Long et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277176 Buchanan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277214 Helenbolt et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140288562 Von Zabern et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296995 Reiley et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303621 Gerold et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140336658 Luna et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140343555 Russi et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140350561 Dacosta et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150032168 Orsak et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150045801 Axelson, Jr. et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150045839 Dacosta et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150051650 Verstreken et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150057667 Ammann et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066094 Prandi et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150112446 Melamed et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119944 Geldwert Apr 2015 A1
20150142064 Perez et al. May 2015 A1
20150150608 Sammarco Jun 2015 A1
20150182273 Stemniski et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223851 Hill et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150245858 Weiner et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160015426 Dayton Jan 2016 A1
20160022315 Soffiatti et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160135858 Dacosta et al. May 2016 A1
20160151165 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160175089 Fallin et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160192950 Dayton et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160199076 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160213384 Fallin et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160235414 Hatch et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160242791 Fallin et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160256204 Patel et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160324532 Montoya et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160354127 Lundquist et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170042598 Santrock et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170042599 Bays et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170079669 Bays et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170143511 Cachia May 2017 A1
20170164989 Weiner et al. Jun 2017 A1
20180132868 Dacosta et al. May 2018 A1
20180344334 Kim et al. Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (100)
Number Date Country
2009227957 Jul 2014 AU
2491824 Sep 2005 CA
2854997 May 2013 CA
695846 Sep 2006 CH
2930668 Aug 2007 CN
201558162 Aug 2010 CN
201572172 Sep 2010 CN
201586060 Sep 2010 CN
201912210 Aug 2011 CN
101237835 Nov 2012 CN
202801773 Mar 2013 CN
103462675 Dec 2013 CN
103505276 Jan 2014 CN
203458450 Mar 2014 CN
103735306 Apr 2014 CN
102860860 May 2014 CN
203576647 May 2014 CN
104490460 Apr 2015 CN
104510523 Apr 2015 CN
104523327 Apr 2015 CN
104546102 Apr 2015 CN
204379413 Jun 2015 CN
204410951 Jun 2015 CN
204428143 Jul 2015 CN
204428144 Jul 2015 CN
204428145 Jul 2015 CN
204446081 Jul 2015 CN
202006010241 Mar 2007 DE
102007053058 Apr 2009 DE
685206 Sep 2000 EP
1508316 May 2007 EP
1897509 Jul 2009 EP
2124772 Dec 2009 EP
2124832 Aug 2012 EP
2632349 Sep 2013 EP
2665428 Nov 2013 EP
2742878 Jun 2014 EP
2750617 Jul 2014 EP
2849684 Mar 2015 EP
2624764 Dec 2015 EP
3023068 May 2016 EP
2362616 Mar 1978 FR
2764183 Nov 1999 FR
2953120 Jan 2012 FR
3030221 Jun 2016 FR
2154143 Sep 1985 GB
2154144 Sep 1985 GB
2334214 Jan 2003 GB
200903719 Jun 2009 IN
200904479 May 2010 IN
140DELNP2012 Feb 2013 IN
2004KOLNP2013 Nov 2013 IN
S635739 Jan 1988 JP
H0531116 Feb 1993 JP
2004174265 Jun 2004 JP
2006158972 Jun 2006 JP
1134243 Aug 2008 JP
2008537498 Sep 2008 JP
4162380 Oct 2008 JP
2011092405 May 2011 JP
2011523889 Aug 2011 JP
4796943 Oct 2011 JP
5466647 Apr 2014 JP
2014511207 May 2014 JP
2014521384 Aug 2014 JP
5628875 Nov 2014 JP
100904142 Jun 2009 KR
756 Nov 2014 MD
2098036 Dec 1997 RU
2195892 02 Jan 2003 RU
2320287 Mar 2008 RU
2321366 02 Apr 2008 RU
2321369 Apr 2008 RU
2346663 02 Feb 2009 RU
2412662 Feb 2011 RU
1333328 Aug 1987 SU
0166022 Sep 2001 WO
03075775 Sep 2003 WO
2004089227 Oct 2004 WO
2008051064 May 2008 WO
2009029798 Mar 2009 WO
2009032101 Mar 2009 WO
2011037885 Mar 2011 WO
2012029008 Mar 2012 WO
2013090392 Jun 2013 WO
2013134387 Sep 2013 WO
2013169475 Nov 2013 WO
2014020561 Feb 2014 WO
2014022055 Feb 2014 WO
2014035991 Mar 2014 WO
2014085882 Jun 2014 WO
2014147099 Sep 2014 WO
2014152219 Sep 2014 WO
2014152535 Sep 2014 WO
2014177783 Nov 2014 WO
2014200017 Dec 2014 WO
2015094409 Jun 2015 WO
2015105880 Jul 2015 WO
2015127515 Sep 2015 WO
2016134160 Aug 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (178)
Entry
“Accu-Cut Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Brochure, Oct. 2018, 2 pages.
“Acumed Osteotomiesystem Operationstechnik,” Acumed, 2014, 19 pages (including 3 pages English translation).
Albano et al., “Biomechanical Study of Transcortical or Transtrabecular Bone Fixation of Patellar Tendon Graft wih Bioabsorbable Pins in ACL Reconstruction in Sheep,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Rev Bras Ortop.) vol. 47, No. 1, 2012, pp. 43-49.
Alvine et al., “Peg and Dowel Fusion of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint,” Foot & Ankle, vol. 1, No. 2, 1980, pp. 90-94.
Anderson et al., “Uncemented STAR Total Ankle Prostheses,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86(1, Suppl 2), Sep. 2004, pp. 103-111, (Abstract Only).
Bednarz et al., “Modified Lapidus Procedure for the Treatment of Hypermobile Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 21, No. 10, Oct. 2000, pp. 816-821.
Blomer, “Knieendoprothetik—Herstellerische Probleme und technologische Entwicklungen,” Orthopade, vol. 29, 2000, pp. 688-696, including English Abstract on p. 689.
Bouaicha et al., “Fixation of Maximal Shift Scarf Osteotomy with Inside-Out Plating: Technique Tip,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 32, No. 5, May 2011, pp. 567-569.
Carr et al., “Correctional Osteotomy for Metatarsus Primus Varus and Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 50-A, No. 7, Oct. 1968, pp. 1353-1367.
Coetzee et al.,“The Lapidus Procedure: A Prospective Cohort Outcome Study,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 526-531.
Dayton et al., “Is Our Current Paradigm for Evaluation and Management of the Bunion Deformity Flawed? A Discussion of Procedure Philosophy Relative to Anatomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, 2015, pp. 102-111.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 584-587.
Dayton et al., “Relationship of Frontal Plane Rotation of First Metatarsal to Proximal Articular Set Angle and Hallux Alignment in Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, No. 3, May/Jun. 2013, pp. 348-354.
Dayton et al., “Quantitative Analysis of the Degree of Frontal Rotation Required to Anatomically Align the First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint During Modified Tarsal-Metatarsal Arthrodesis Without Capsular Balancing,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2015, pp. 1-6.
De Geer et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the First Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, Mar. 26, 2015, 9 pages.
Didomenico et al., “Correction of Frontal Plane Rotation of Sesamoid Apparatus during the Lapidus Procedure: A Novel Approach,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 248-251.
Dobbe et al. “Patient-Tailored Plate for Bone Fixation and Accurate 3D Positioning in Corrective Osteotomy,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 51, No. 1-2, Feb. 2013, pp. 19-27, (Abstract Only).
Doty et al., “Hallux valgus and hypermobility of the first ray: facts and fiction,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1655-1660.
EBI Extra Small Rail Fixator, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-ebi-extra-small-rail-fixator>, 7 pages.
European Patent Application No. 16837611.9, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 11, 2019, 8 pages.
“Futura Forefoot Implant Arthroplasty Products,” Tornier, Inc., 2008, 14 pages.
Galli et al., “Enhanced Lapidus Arthrodesis: Crossed Screw Technique With Middle Cuneiform Fixation Further Reduces Sagittal Mobility,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 54, vol. 3, May/Jun. 2015, published online: Nov. 21, 2014, pp. 437-440.
Garthwait, “Accu-Cut System Facilitates Enhanced Precision,” Podiatry Today, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 2005, 6 pages.
Gonzalez Del Pino et al., “Variable Angle Locking Intercarpal Fusion System for Four-Corner Arthrodesis: Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2012, pp. 73-78.
Gotte, “Entwicklung eines Assistenzrobotersystems fur die Knieendoprothetik,” Forschungsberichte, Technische Universitat Munchen, 165, 2002, 11 pages, including partial English Translation.
Gregg et al., “Plantar plate repair and Weil osteotomy for metatarsophalangeal joint instability,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, 2007, pp. 116-121.
Grondal et al., “A Guide Plate for Accurate Positioning of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint during Fusion,” Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie, vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 167-178 (Abstract Only).
“HAT-TRICK Lesser Toe Repair System,” Smith & Nephew, Brochure, Aug. 2014, 12 pages.
“HAT-TRICK Lesser Toe Repair System, Foot and Ankle Technique Guide, Metatarsal Shortening Osteotomy Surgical Fechnique,” Smith & Nephew, 2014, 16 pages.
Hetherington et al., “Evaluation of surgical experience and the use of an osteotomy guide on the apical angle of an Austin osteotomy,” The Foot, vol. 18, 2008, pp. 159-164.
Hirao et al., “Computer assisted planning and custom-made surgical guide for malunited pronation deformity after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis: A case report,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 19, Nos. 1-3, 2014, pp. 13-19.
“Hoffmann II Compact External Fixation System,” Stryker, Brochure, Literature No. 5075-1-500, 2006, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann II Micro Lengthener,” Stryker, Operative Technique, Literature No. 5075-2-002, 2008, 12 pages.
“Hoffmann Small System External Fixator Orthopedic Instruments,” Stryker, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Stryker-Hoffmann-Small-System-External-Fixator_1438850129.html>, 3 pages.
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/046892, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2016, 18 pages.
Kim et al., “A New Measure of Tibial Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus in Relation to the Coronal Rotation of the Firsl Metatarsal in CT Scans,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 8, 2015, pp. 944-952.
“Lag Screw Target Bow,” Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG, Germany 2004, 8 pages.
Lapidus, “The Author's Bunion Operation From 1931 to 1959,” Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 16, 1960, pp. 119-135.
Lieske et al., “Implantation einer Sprunggelenktotalendo-prothese vom Typ Salto 2,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 4, 2014, pp. 401-413, including English Abstract on p. 403.
MAC (Multi Axial Correction) Fixation System, Biomet Trauma, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://footandanklefixation.com/product/biomet-trauma-mac-multi-axial-correction-fixation-system>, 7 pages.
Magin, “Computemavigierter Gelenkersatz am Knie mit dem Orthopilot,” Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 63-80, including English Abstract on p. 64.
Magin, “Die belastungsstabile Lapidus-Arthrodese bei Hallux-valgus-Deformität mittels IVP-Plattenfixateur (V-TEK-System),” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, vol. 26, No. 2, 2014, pp. 184-195, including English Abstract on p. 186.
Michelangelo Bunion System, Surgical Technique, Instratek Incorporated, publication date unknown, 4 pages.
Mini Joint Distractor, Arthrex, retrieved Dec. 19, 2014, from the Internet: <http://www.arthrex.com/foot-ankle/mini-joint-distractor/products>, 2 pages.
MiniRail System, Small Bone Innovations, Surgical Technique, 2010, 24 pages.
Miyake et al., “Three-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Diaphyseal Forearm Fractures Using Custom-Made Surgical Guides Based on Computer Simulation,” JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques, vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, 11 pages.
Modular Rail System: External Fixator, Smith & Nephew, Surgical Technique, 2013, 44 pages.
Monnich et al., “A Hand Guided Robotic Planning System for Laser Osteotomy in Surgery,” World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering vol. 25/6: Surgery, Nimimal Invasive Interventions, Endoscopy and Image Guided Therapy, Sep. 7-12, 2009, pp. 59-62, (Abstract Only).
Moore et al., “Effect of Ankle Flexion Angle on Axial Alignment of Total Ankle Replacement,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 2010, pp. 1093-1098, (Abstract Only).
Mortier et al., “Axial Rotation of the First Metatarsal Head in a Normal Population and Hallux Valgus Patients,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, vol. 98, 2012, pp. 677-683.
Nagy et al., “The AO Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy System Indications and Surgical Technique,” Journal of Wrist Surgery, vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 91-97.
NexFix from Nexa Orthopedics, MetaFix I from Merete Medical, Inc. and The BioPro Lower Extremities from BioPro, found in Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, 4 pages.
Odenbring et al., “A guide instrument for high tibial osteotomy,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 60, No. 4, 1989, pp. 449-451.
Okuda et al., “Postoperative Incomplete Reduction of the Sesamoids as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91-A, No. 1, Jul. 2009, pp. 1637-1645.
Osher et al., “Accurate Determination of Relative Metatarsal Protrusion with a Small Intermetatarsal Angle: A Novel Simplified Method,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2014, published online Jun. 3, 2014, pp. 548-556.
Otsuki et al., “Developing a novel custom cutting guide for curved per-acetabular osteotomy,” International Orthopaedics (SICOT), vol. 37, 2013, pp. 1033-1038.
Patel et al., “Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis: Rate of Nonunion in 227 Cases,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2004, pp. 37-42.
“Patient to Patient Precision, Accu-Cut, Osteotomy Guide System,” BioPro, Foot & Ankle International Journal, vol. 23, No. 8, Aug. 2002, 2 pages.
Peters et al., “Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Laceration as a Complication of Total Ankle Arthroplasty,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 34, No. 1, 2013, pp. 148-149.
“Prophecy Inbone Preoperative Navigation Guides,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Nov. 2013, 6 pages.
“RAYHACK Ulnar Shortening Generation II Low-Profile Locking System Surgical Technique,” Wright Medical Technology, Inc., Dec. 2013, 20 pages.
Rx-Fix Mini Rail External Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Brochure, Aug. 15, 2014, 2 pages.
Saltzman et al., “Prospective Controlled Trial of STAR Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Fusion: Initial Results,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 30, No. 7, Jul. 2009, pp. 579-596.
Scanlan et al. “Technique Tip: Subtalar Joint Fusion Using a Parallel Guide and Double Screw Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, Issue 3, May-Jun. 2010, pp. 305-309, (Abstract Only).
Scranton Jr. et al, “Anatomic Variations in the First Ray: Part I. Anatomic Aspects Related to Bunion Surgery,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 151, Sep. 1980, pp. 244-255.
Siddiqui et al. “Fixation of Metatarsal Fracture With Bone Plate in a Dromedary Heifer,” Open Veterinary Journal, vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp. 17-20.
Sidekick Stealth Rearfoot Fixator, Wright Medical Technology, Surgical Technique, Dec. 2, 2013, 20 pages.
Simpson et al., “Computer-Assisted Distraction Ostegogenesis by Ilizarov's Method,” International Journal of Medical Robots and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 310-320, (Abstract Only).
Small Bone External Fixation System, Acumed, Surgical Technique, Effective date Sep. 2014, 8 pages.
“Smith & Nephew scores a HAT-TRICK with its entry into the high-growth hammer toe repair market,” Smith & Nephew, Jul. 31, 2014, 2 pages.
Stableloc External Fixation System, Acumed, Product Overview, Effective date Sep. 2015, 4 pages.
Stahl et al., “Derotation of Post-Traumatic Femoral Deformities by Closed Intramedullary Sawing,” Injury, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 145-151, (Abstract Only).
Talbot et al., “Assessing Sesamoid Subluxation: How Good is the AP Radiograph?,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 19, No. 8, Aug. 1998, pp. 547-554.
TempFix Spanning the Ankle Joint Half Pin and Transfixing Pin Techniques, Biomet Orthopedics, Surgical Technique, 2012, 16 pages.
Toth et al., “The Effect of First Ray Shortening in the Development of Metatarsalgia in the Second Through Fourth Rays After Metatarsal Osteotomy,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 61-63.
Tricot et al., “3D-corrective osteotomy using surgical guides for posttraumatic distal humeral deformity,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, vol. 78, No. 4, 2012, pp. 538-542.
Vitek et al., “Die Behandlung des Hallux rigidus mit Cheilektomie und Akin-Moberg-Osteotomie unter Verwendung einer neuen Schnittlehre und eines neuen Schraubensystems,” Orthopadische Praxis, vol. 44, Nov. 2008, pp. 563-566, including English Abstract on p. 564.
Vitek, “Neue Techniken in der Fußchirurgie Das V-tek-System,” ABW Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, 2009, 11 pages, including English Abstract.
Weber et al., “A Simple System for Navigation of Bone Alignment Osteotomies of the Tibia,” International Congress Series, vol. 1268, Jan. 2004, pp. 608-613, (Abstract Only).
Weil et al., “Anatomic Plantar Plate Repair Using the Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy Approach,” Foot & Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, pp. 145-150.
Wendl et al., “Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik,” OP-Joumal, vol. 17, 2002, pp. 22-27, including English Abstract.
Whipple et al., “Zimmer Herbert Whipple Bone Screw System: Surgical Techniques for Fixation of Scaphoid and Other Small Bone Fractures,” Zimmer, 2003, 59 pages.
Yakacki et al. “Compression Forces of Internal and External Ankle Fixation Devices with Simulated Bone Resorption,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 76-85, (Abstract Only).
Yasuda et al., “Proximal Supination Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 36, No. 6, Jun. 2015, pp. 696-704.
Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 41 pages.
Prior Art Publications, Exhibit A of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 3 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute (Apr. 2014), Exhibit B1 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 97 pages.
Claim Chart for Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide to the Lapidus Bunionectomy,” HMP Global (Sep. 6, 2013), Exhibit B2 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 67 pages.
Claim Chart for Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” Update 2015: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Podiatry Institute, Chpt. 6, pp. 23-29 (Apr. 2015), Exhibit B3 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 151 pages.
Claim Chart for Mote, “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” The Journal Foot & Ankle Surgery (Sep. 1, 2009), Exhibit B5 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 21 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,268 to Fallin et al., entitled “Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method,” issued Aug. 13, 2019, Exhibit B6 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 155 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,645 to Lawrence et al., entitled “Metatarsal Bone Implant Cutting Guide,” issued Jan. 18, 2010, Exhibit B7 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 76 pages.
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,057 to Dacosta et al., entitled “Bone Implants and Cutting Apparatuses and Methods,” issued Apr. 8, 2011, Exhibit B8 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 110 pages.
Obviousness Chart, Exhibit C of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 153 pages.
“Foot and Ankle Instrument Set,” Smith & Nephew, 2013, 2 pages.
“Lapidus Pearls: Gaining Joint Exposure to Decrease Non-Union,” Youtube, Retrieved online from <https://www.youtube com/watch?v=-jqJyE/pj-Y>, dated Nov. 2, 2009, 3 pages.
“Reconstructive Surgery of the Foot & Ankle,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Conference Program, May 2015, 28 pages.
“Speed Continuous Active Compression Implant,” BioMedical Enterprises, Inc., A120-029 Rev. 3, 2013, 4 pages.
“Visionaire: Patient Matched Cutting Blocks Surgical Procedure,” Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2009, 2 pages.
Arthrex, “Comprehensive Foot System,” Retrieved online from <https://www.arthrex.com/resources/animation/8U3iaPvY6kO8bwFAwZF50Q/comprehensive-foot-system?referringTeam=foot_and_ankle>, dated Aug. 27, 2013, 3 pages.
Baravarian, “Why the Lapidus Procedure is Ideal for Bunions,” Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballearhmpgloballe.com/site/podipodi/article/5542>, dated May 2006, 8 pages.
Bauer et al., “Offset-V Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Shaft in Hallux Abducto Valgus,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 29, 2013, 26 pages.
Cottom, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 517-522.
Coughlin, “Fixation of the Lapidus Arthrodesis with a Plantar Interfragmentary Screw and Medial Low Profile Locking Plate,”Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol. 7, 1999, pp. 133-143.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 274-278.
Dayton et al., “Relationship of Frontal Plane Rotation of First Metatarsal to Proximal Articular Set Angle and Hallux Alignment in Patients Undergoing Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Abducto Valgus: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 2013, Article in Press, Mar. 1, 2013, 7 pages.
DiDomenico et al., “Lapidus Bunionectomy: First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis,” McGlamry's Comprehensive Textbook of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Fourth Edition, vol. 1, Chapter 31, 2013, 24 pages.
Fallin et al., US Provisional Application Entitled Indexed Tri-Planar Osteotomy Guide and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 62/118,378, filed Feb. 19, 2015, 62 pages.
Fishco, “A Straightforward Guide To The Lapidus Bunionectomy,”Podiatry Today, Retrieved online from <https://www.hmpgloballeamingnetwork.com/site/podiatry/blogged/straightforward-guide-lapidus-bunionectomy>, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 5 pages.
Fishco, “Making the Lapidus Easy,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2014, Chapter 14, 2014, pp. 91-93.
Fleming et al., “Results of Modified Lapidus Arthrodesis Procedure Using Medial Eminence as an Interpositional Autograft,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 272-275.
Fuhrmann, “Arthrodesis of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint for Correction of the Advanced Splayfoot Accompanied by a Hallux Valgus,” Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, No. 2, 2005, pp. 195-210.
Gerard et al., “The Modified Lapidus Procedure,” Orthopedics, vol. 31, No. 3, Mar. 2008, 7 pages.
Giannoudis et al., “Hallux Valgus Correction,” Practical Procedures in Elective Orthopaedic Surgery, Pelvis and Lower Extremity, Chapter 38, 2012, 22 pages.
Greiner, “The Jargon of Pedal Movements,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 109-125.
Groves, “Functional Position Joint Sectioning: Pre-Load Method for Lapidus Arthrodesis,” The Podiatry Institute, Update 2015, Chapter 6, 2015, pp. 23-29.
Hardy et al., “Observations on Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 33B, No. 3, Aug. 1951, pp. 376-391.
Holmes, Jr., “Correction of the Intermetatarsal Angle Component of Hallux Valgus Using Fiberwire-Attached Endo-buttons,” Revista Internacional de Ciencias Podologicas, vol. 6, No. 2, 2012, pp. 73-79.
Integra, “Integra Large Qwix Positioning and Fixation Screw, Surgical Technique,” 2012, 16 pages.
Kilmartin et al., “Combined rotation scarf and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus: a patient focused 9 year follow up of 50 patients,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, 12 pages.
Lee et al., “Technique Tip: Lateral Soft-Tissue Release for Correction of Hallux Valgus Through a Medial Incision Using A Dorsal Flap Over the First Metatarsal,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 8, Aug. 2007, pp. 949-951.
Mote et al., “First Metatarsal-Cuneiform Arthrodesis for the Treatment of First Ray Pathology: A Technical Guide,” JFAS Techniques Guide, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 593-601.
Myerson, “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis,” The Foot and Ankle, Chapter 9, 1997, pp. 107-117.
Sammarco, “Surgical Strategies: Mau Osteotomy for Correction of Moderate and Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 2007, pp. 857-864.
Schon et al., “Cuneiform-Metatarsal Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus,”The Foot and Ankle, Second Edition, Chapter 8, 2002, pp. 99-117.
Sokoloff, “Lapidus Procedure,” Textbook of Bunion Surgery, Chapter 15, 1981, pp. 277-287.
Stamatis et al., “Mini Locking Plate as ”Medial Buttress“ for Oblique Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 31, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 920-922.
Stewart, “Use for BME Speed Nitinol Staple Fixation for the Lapidus Procedure,” date unknown, 1 page.
Wukich et al., “Hypermobility of the First Tarsometatarsal Joint,” Foot and Ankle Clinics, vol. 10, No. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 157-166.
Dayton et al., “Biwinged Excision for Round Pedal Lesions,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 35, No. 3, 1996, pp. 244-249.
Dayton et al., “Medial Incision Approach to the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 40, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 414-417.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Moderate and Severe Metatarsus Primus Adductus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 41, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2002, pp. 316-319.
Dayton et al., “Use of the Z Osteotomy for Tailor Bunionectomy,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 42, No. 3, May/Jun. 2003, pp. 167-169.
Dayton et al., “Early Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Observational Case Analysis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 43, No. 3, May/Jun. 2004, pp. 156-159.
Dayton et al., “Dorsal Suspension Stitch: An Alternative Stabilization After Flexor Tenotomy for Flexible Hammer Digit Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 48, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2009, pp. 602-605.
Dayton et al., “The Extended Knee Hemilithotomy Position for Gastrocnemius Recession,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 49, 2010, pp. 214-216.
Wienke et al., “Bone Stimulation For Nonunions: What the Evidence Reveals,” Podiatry Today, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 52-57.
Dayton et al., “Hallux Varus as Complication of Foot Compartment Syndrome,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 50, 2011, pp. 504-506.
Dayton et al., “Measurement of Mid-Calcaneal Length on Plain Radiographs: Reliability of a New Method,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2011, pp. 280-283.
Dayton et al., “A User-Friendly Method of Pin Site Management for External Fixators,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, Sep. 16, 2011, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “Effectiveness of a Locking Plate in Preserving Midcalcaneal Length and Positional Outcome after Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy: A Retrospective Pilot Study,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 710-713.
Dayton et al., “Does Postoperative Showering or Bathing of a Surgical Site Increase the Incidence of Infection? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 52, 2013, pp. 612-614.
Dayton et al., “Technique for Minimally Invasive Reduction of Calcaneal Fractures Using Small Bilateral External Fixation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Clarification of the Anatomic Definition of the Bunion Deformity,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 160-163.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Metatarsal in a Cadaveric Foot Model,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 5 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in First Metatarsal and Medial Cuneiform Positions after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 32-35.
Dayton et al., “Reduction of the Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Reduction of Intermetatarsal Angle after First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis in Patients with Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 29-31.
Dayton et al., “Principles of Management of Growth Plate Fractures in the Foot and Ankle,” Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Pediatric Foot Deformities, Oct. 2013, 17 pages.
Dayton et al., “Observed Changes in Radiographic Measurements of the First Ray after Frontal and Transverse Plane Rotation of the Hallux: Does the Hallux Drive the Metatarsal in a Bunion Deformity?,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2014, 4 pages.
Rodriguez et al., “Ilizarov method of fixation for the management of pilon and distal tibial fractures in the compromised diabetic patient: A technique guide,” The Foot and Ankle Journal Online, vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, 9 pages.
Feilmeier et al., “Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in the Foot and Ankle with Early Exposure and Showering of Surgical Sites: A Prospective Observation,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 53, 2014, pp. 173-175.
Catanese et al., “Measuring Sesamoid Position in Hallux Valgus: When Is the Sesamoid Axial View Necessary,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, 2014, 3 pages.
Dayton et al., “Comparison of Complications for Internal and External Fixation for Charcot Reconstruction: A Systematic Review,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 4 pages.
Dayton et al., “A new triplanar paradigm for bunion management,” Lower Extremity Review, Apr. 2015, 9 pages.
Dayton et al., “American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons' Clinical Consensus Statement: Perioperative Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Clean Elective Foot Surgery,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 7 pages.
Dayton et al., “Complications of Metatarsal Suture Techniques for Bunion Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Article in Press, 2015, 3 pages.
DeCarbo et al., “The Weil Osteotomy: A Refresher,” Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 13, No. 4, Dec. 2014, pp. 191-198.
DeCarbo et al., “Resurfacing Interpositional Arthroplasty for Degenerative Joint Diseas of the First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint,” Podiatry Management, Jan. 2013, pp. 137-142.
DeCarbo et al., “Locking Plates: Do They Prevent Complications?,” Podiatry Today, Apr. 2014, 7 pages.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part II: Operative Treatment,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 748-758.
Kim et lal., “A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Outcomes for Arthrodesis, Hemi-Metallic Joint Implant, and Resectional Arthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 51, 2012, pp. 50-56.
Easley et al., “Current Concepts Review: Hallux Valgus Part I: Pathomechanics, Clinical Assessment, and Nonoperative Management,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 28, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 654-659.
Sandhu et al., “Digital Arthrodesis With a One-Piece Memory Nitinol Intramedullary Fixation Device: A Retrospective Review,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 6, No. 5, Oct. 2013, pp. 364-366.
Weber et al., “Use of the First Ray Splay Test to Assess Transverse Plane Instability Before First Metatarsocuneiform Fusion,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 45, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2006, pp. 278-282.
Smith et al., “Opening Wedge Osteotomies for Correction of Hallux Valgus: A Review of Wedge Plate Fixation,” Foot and Ankle Specialist, vol. 2, No. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 277-282.
Easley et al., “What is the Best Treatment for Hallux Valgus?,” Evidence-Based Orthopaedics—The Best Answers to Clinical Questions, Chapter 73, 2009, pp. 479-491.
Shurnas et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Opening Wedge Osteotomy,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 13, 2011, pp. 73-78.
Coetzee et al., “Revision Hallux Valgus Correction,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section I, Chapter 15, 2011, pp. 84-96.
Le et al., “Tarsometatarsal Arthrodesis,” Operative Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Section II, Chapter 40, 2011, pp. 281-285.
Collan et al., “The biomechanics of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus: A preliminary study utilizing a weight bearing extremity CT,” Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 19, 2013, pp. 155-161.
Eustace et al., “Hallux valgus, first metatarsal pronation and collapse of the medial longitudinal arch—a radiological correlation,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 23, 1994, pp. 191-194.
Mizuno et al., “Detorsion Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal Bone in Hallux Valgus,” Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Tokyo, 1956; 30:813-819.
Okuda et al., “The Shape of the Lateral Edge of the First Metatarsal Head as a Risk Factor for Recurrence of Hallux Valgus,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 89, 2007, pp. 2163-2172.
Okuda et al., “Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus: Comparison of Outcome for Moderate and Severe Deformities,” Foot and Ankle International, vol. 29, No. 7, Jul. 2008, pp. 664-670.
D'Amico et al., “Motion of the First Ray: Clarification Through Investigation,” Journal of the American Podiatry Association, vol. 69, No. 1, Jan. 1979, pp. 17-23.
Groves, “Operative Report,” St. Tammany Parish Hospital, Date of Procedure, Mar. 26, 2014, 2 pages.
Claim Chart for Groves Public Use (Mar. 26, 2014), Exhibit B4 of Defendant Fusion Orthopedics LLC's Invalidity Contentions, No. CV-22-00490-PHX-SRB, US District Court for the District of Arizona, Aug. 27, 2022, 161 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220117644 A1 Apr 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62205338 Aug 2015 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 17352431 Jun 2021 US
Child 17567879 US
Parent 16998155 Aug 2020 US
Child 17352431 US
Parent 16031855 Jul 2018 US
Child 16998155 US
Parent 15452236 Mar 2017 US
Child 16031855 US
Parent 14981335 Dec 2015 US
Child 15452236 US