Patent Grant
11883056
The present invention relates generally to bone preparation tools and processes such as may be used for an installation of a prosthesis, and more specifically, but not exclusively, to improvements in prosthesis placement and positioning through precision and efficient bone processing.
The subject matter discussed in the background section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background section or associated with the subject matter of the background section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also be inventions.
Earlier patents issued to the present applicant have described problems associated with prosthesis installation, for example acetabular cup placement in total hip replacement surgery. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,168,154 and 9,220,612, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference thereto in their entireties for all purposes. Even though hip replacement surgery has been one of the most successful operations, it continues to be plagued with a problem of inconsistent acetabular cup placement. Cup mal-positioning is the single greatest cause of hip instability, a major factor in polyethylene wear, osteolysis, impingement, component loosening and the need for hip revision surgery.
These incorporated patents explain that the process of cup implantation with a mallet is highly unreliable and a significant cause of this inconsistency. The patents note two specific problems associated with the use of the mallet. First is the fact that the surgeon is unable to consistently hit on the center point of the impaction plate, which causes undesirable torques and moment arms, leading to mal-alignment of the cup. Second, is the fact that the amount of force utilized in this process is non-standardized.
In these patents there is presented a new apparatus and method of cup insertion which uses an oscillatory motion to insert the prosthesis. Prototypes have been developed and continue to be refined and illustrate that vibratory force may allow insertion of the prosthesis with less force, as well, in some embodiments, of allowing simultaneous positioning and alignment of the implant.
There are other ways of breaking down of the large undesirable, torque-producing forces associated with the discrete blows of the mallet into a series of smaller, axially aligned controlled taps, which may achieve the same result incrementally, and in a stepwise fashion to those set forth in the incorporated patents, (with regard to, for example, cup insertion without unintended divergence).
An embodiment of the present invention may modify brute force bone preparation processes and reduce bone preparation trauma by introducing vibrations to primary bone preparation motion applied by a bone preparation implement. These vibrations can be subsonic or ultrasonic. Vibrations may affect interaction of the bone preparation implement and/or oversized implant with bone by two phenomena: (i) changing the frictional interactions between bone and metal, and (ii) possibly, engaging bone's natural resonance frequencies (modal frequencies) which may make bone bend and flex.
There are two problems that may be considered independently, though some solutions may address both in a single solution. These problems include i) undesirable and unpredictable torques and moment arms that are related to the primitive method currently used by surgeons, which involves manually banging the mallet on an impaction plate mated to the prosthesis and ii) non-standardized and essentially uncontrolled and unquantized amounts of force utilized in these processes.
What is needed is a system and method for improving installation of a prosthesis.
Disclosed is a system and method for improving installation of a prosthesis. The following summary of the invention is provided to facilitate an understanding of some of the technical features related to prosthesis assembly and installation and is not intended to be a full description of the present invention. A full appreciation of the various aspects of the invention can be gained by taking the entire specification, claims, drawings, and abstract as a whole. The present invention is applicable to other prosthesis in addition to acetabular cups, other modular prosthesis in addition to assembly of modular femoral and humeral prosthesis, and to other alignment and navigation systems in addition to referenced light guides.
An embodiment of the present invention may include axial alignment of force transference, such as, for example, an axially sliding hammer moving between stops to impart a non-torqueing installation force. There are various ways of motivating and controlling the sliding hammer, including a magnitude of transferred force. Optional enhancements may include pressure and/or sound sensors for gauging when a desired depth of implantation has occurred.
Other embodiments include adaptation of various devices for accurate assembly of modular prostheses, such as those that include a head accurately impacted onto a trunnion taper that is part of a stem or other element of the prosthesis.
Still other embodiments include an alignment system to improve site preparation, such as, for example, including a projected visual reference of a desired orientation of a tool and then having that reference marked and available for use during operation of the tool to ensure that the alignment remains proper throughout its use, such as during a reaming operation.
Further embodiments include enhancement of various tools, such as those used for cutting, trimming, drilling, and the like, with ultrasonic enhancement to make the device a better cutting, trimming, drilling, etc. device to enable its use with less strength and with improved accuracy.
A bone preparation tool, including a bone-processing implement configured to process an in-patient bone using a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion; and a motive system, coupled to the cutting implement, configured to operate the cutting implement in the primary mode of freedom of motion and in a secondary mode of primary mode of freedom different from the primary mode of freedom wherein the secondary mode of freedom includes an ultrasonic vibratory motion.
A method for preparing an in-patient bone, including processing, using a bone-processing implement, the in-patient bone using a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion for the a bone-processing implement; and concurrently operating the a bone-processing implement in a secondary motion including a secondary mode of freedom of motion; wherein the secondary mode of freedom is different than the primary mode of freedom of motion; and wherein the secondary motion includes an ultrasonic vibration motion.
A bone preparation tool, including a bone-processing implement configured to process an in-patient bone using a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion; and a motive system, coupled to said cutting implement, configured to operate said bone-processing implement in said primary mode of freedom of motion and in a secondary mode of motion, wherein said primary mode of freedom includes a non-ultrasonic motion and wherein said secondary mode of freedom includes an ultrasonic vibratory motion superimposed on said non-ultrasonic motion.
A method for preparing an in-patient bone, including processing, using a bone-processing implement, the in-patient bone using a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion for said a bone-processing implement; and concurrently operating said a bone-processing implement in a secondary motion including a secondary mode of freedom of motion; wherein said primary motion consists essentially of a non-ultrasonic motion; and wherein said secondary motion includes an ultrasonic vibration motion.
A bone preparation tool preparing an in-patient bone with a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion, including a bone-processing implement configured to process the in-patient bone with the primary motion in the primary mode of freedom of motion; an adapter configured to engage and to secure said bone-processing implement; and a motive, coupled to said adapter, configured to operate said bone-processing implement by use of said adapter, said motive system operating said bone-processing implement in the primary mode of freedom of motion, said motive system configured to operate said bone-processing implement in a secondary motion in a secondary freedom of motion, and said motive system configured to superimpose said motions in said modes of freedom of motion producing a superimposed motion, wherein the primary motion and said secondary motion are superimposed by said motive system before an application of said superimposed motion to said bone-processing implement, and wherein one of the primary motion and secondary motion includes a driven vibratory motion.
A method for operating a bone preparation tool configured for preparation of an in-patient bone, including producing a primary motion in a primary mode of freedom of motion; producing a secondary motion in a secondary mode of freedom of motion; superimposing said motions together producing a superimposed motion; and applying said superimposed motion to a bone preparation implement of the bone preparation tool; and wherein said superimposed motion includes a driven vibratory motion.
Any of the embodiments described herein may be used alone or together with one another in any combination. Inventions encompassed within this specification may also include embodiments that are only partially mentioned or alluded to or are not mentioned or alluded to at all in this brief summary or in the abstract. Although various embodiments of the invention may have been motivated by various deficiencies with the prior art, which may be discussed or alluded to in one or more places in the specification, the embodiments of the invention do not necessarily address any of these deficiencies. In other words, different embodiments of the invention may address different deficiencies that may be discussed in the specification. Some embodiments may only partially address some deficiencies or just one deficiency that may be discussed in the specification, and some embodiments may not address any of these deficiencies.
Other features, benefits, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon a review of the present disclosure, including the specification, drawings, and claims.
The accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally-similar elements throughout the separate views and which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, further illustrate the present invention and, together with the detailed description of the invention, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method for improving installation of a prosthesis. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements.
Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
Definitions
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this general inventive concept belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and the present disclosure, and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
The following definitions apply to some of the aspects described with respect to some embodiments of the invention. These definitions may likewise be expanded upon herein.
As used herein, the term “or” includes “and/or” and the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. Expressions such as “at least one of,” when preceding a list of elements, modify the entire list of elements and do not modify the individual elements of the list.
As used herein, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to an object can include multiple objects unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It will be understood that when an element is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may be present therebetween. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” another element, there are no intervening elements present.
As used herein, the term “set” refers to a collection of one or more objects. Thus, for example, a set of objects can include a single object or multiple objects. Objects of a set also can be referred to as members of the set. Objects of a set can be the same or different. In some instances, objects of a set can share one or more common properties.
As used herein, the term “adjacent” refers to being near or adjoining. Adjacent objects can be spaced apart from one another or can be in actual or direct contact with one another. In some instances, adjacent objects can be coupled to one another or can be formed integrally with one another.
As used herein, the terms “connect,” “connected,” and “connecting” refer to a direct attachment or link. Connected objects have no or no substantial intermediary object or set of objects, as the context indicates.
As used herein, the terms “couple,” “coupled,” and “coupling” refer to an operational connection or linking. Coupled objects can be directly connected to one another or can be indirectly connected to one another, such as via an intermediary set of objects.
The use of the term “about” applies to all numeric values, whether or not explicitly indicated. This term generally refers to a range of numbers that one of ordinary skill in the art would consider as a reasonable amount of deviation to the recited numeric values (i.e., having the equivalent function or result). For example, this term can be construed as including a deviation of ±10 percent of the given numeric value provided such a deviation does not alter the end function or result of the value. Therefore, a value of about 1% can be construed to be a range from 0.9% to 1.1%.
As used herein, the terms “substantially” and “substantial” refer to a considerable degree or extent. When used in conjunction with an event or circumstance, the terms can refer to instances in which the event or circumstance occurs precisely as well as instances in which the event or circumstance occurs to a close approximation, such as accounting for typical tolerance levels or variability of the embodiments described herein.
As used herein, the terms “optional” and “optionally” mean that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur and that the description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances in which it does not.
As used herein, the term “size” refers to a characteristic dimension of an object. Thus, for example, a size of an object that is spherical can refer to a diameter of the object. In the case of an object that is non-spherical, a size of the non-spherical object can refer to a diameter of a corresponding spherical object, where the corresponding spherical object exhibits or has a particular set of derivable or measurable properties that are substantially the same as those of the non-spherical object. Thus, for example, a size of a non-spherical object can refer to a diameter of a corresponding spherical object that exhibits light scattering or other properties that are substantially the same as those of the non-spherical object. Alternatively, or in conjunction, a size of a non-spherical object can refer to an average of various orthogonal dimensions of the object. Thus, for example, a size of an object that is a spheroidal can refer to an average of a major axis and a minor axis of the object. When referring to a set of objects as having a particular size, it is contemplated that the objects can have a distribution of sizes around the particular size. Thus, as used herein, a size of a set of objects can refer to a typical size of a distribution of sizes, such as an average size, a median size, or a peak size.
As used herein, the term “vibration” or “vibratory” refers to a series of mechanical displacement motions (e.g., repetitive positional variation or oscillations in time) about an equilibrium point that includes one or more axes of motion. The equilibrium point may, in turn, move, such as for impactless implantation or fixation in which the equilibrium point advances deeper into an installation site or improved bone preparation implement sectioning a bone advancing into a section cut, for example, a desired depth into live bone or separation of bone sections by cutting through the bone. These vibrations are forced and responsive to a time-varying disturbance from an oscillation engine or the like applied, directly or indirectly, to a structure (e.g., a prosthesis or other implant) to be installed and not ancillary normal mechanical ringing of a structure in response to an application of force which is typically easily damped and unable to contribute to bone removal. The disturbance can be a periodic input, a steady-state input, a transient input, and/or a random input. A periodic input may include a harmonic or nonharmonic disturbance. Oscillation about the equilibrium point may be different, or similar, for each degree of freedom available for the vibratory motion. For example, there may be one oscillation profile longitudinally and a second oscillation profile laterally (e.g., perpendicular to the longitudinal axis), the two profiles generally matching, related, derived, or independent. An amount of displacement of an oscillation is generally less than a dimension of the implant or a length dimension of the bone preparation implement, and may be much less, on the order of about a millimeter or less. These oscillations may be sub-sonic, near ultrasonic, or ultrasonic. Driven vibratory motions are “forced” when an amplitude of the motion is not appreciably degraded during the application of those motions to a structure for its designed use. It may be that a magnitude/amplitude of the motion remain about the same, but a frequency may decrease and/or a power required may increase to maintain this amplitude. What is appreciable may be dependent upon the design considerations and constraints but may be within 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, or 1% amplitude variation during use, such as implantation or press fit fixation of an implant into bone or an assembly of a head onto a trunnion, for example.
Embodiments of the present invention may include one of more solutions to the above problems. The incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 9,168,154 includes a description of several embodiments, sometimes referred to herein as a BMD3 device, some of which illustrate a principle for breaking down large forces associated with the discrete blows of a mallet into a series of small taps, which in turn perform similarly in a stepwise fashion while being more efficient and safer. The BMD3 device produces the same displacement of the implant without the need for the large forces from the repeated impacts from the mallet. The BMD3 device may allow modulation of force required for cup insertion based on bone density, cup geometry, and surface roughness. Further, a use of the BMD3 device may result in the acetabulum experiencing less stress and deformation and the implant may experience a significantly smoother sinking pattern into the acetabulum during installation. Some embodiments of the BMD3 device may provide a superior approach to these problems, however, described herein are two problems that can be approached separately and with more basic methods as an alternative to, or in addition to, a BMD3 device. An issue of undesirable torques, and moment arms is primarily related to the primitive method currently used by surgeons, which involves manually banging the mallet on the impaction plate. The amount of force utilized in this process is also non-standardized and somewhat out of control.
With respect to the impaction plate and undesirable torques, an embodiment of the present invention may include a simple mechanical solution as an alternative to some BMD3 devices, which can be utilized by the surgeon's hand or by a robotic machine and in some cases a smart tool robotic machine. A direction of the impact may be directed or focused by any number of standard techniques (e.g., A-frame, C-arm or navigation system). Elsewhere described herein is a refinement of this process by considering directionality in the reaming process, in contrast to only considering it just prior to impaction. First, we propose to eliminate the undesirable torques by delivering the impacts by a sledgehammer device or a structure (e.g., hollow cylindrical mass) that travels over a stainless rod.
Device 100 includes a moveable hammer 105 sliding axially and freely along a rod 110. Rod 110 includes a proximal stop 115 and distal stop 120. These stops that may be integrated into rod 110 to allow transference of force to rod 110 when hammer 105 strikes distal stop 120. At a distal end 210 of rod 110, device 100 includes an attachment system 215 for a prosthesis 220. For example, when prosthesis 220 includes an acetabular cup having a threaded cavity 225, attachment system 215 may include a complementary threaded structure that screws into threaded cavity 225. The illustrated design of device 100 allows only a perfect axial force to be imparted. The surgeon cannot deliver a blow to the edge of an impaction plate. Therefore, the design of this instrument is in and of itself protective, eliminating a problem of “surgeon's mallet hitting on the edge of the impaction plate” or other mis-aligned force transference, and creating undesirable torques, and hence unintentional mal-alignment of prosthesis 220 from an intended position/orientation.
A longitudinal axis 230 extends through the ends of rod 110. Attachment system 215 aligns prosthesis 220 to axis 230 when rod 110 is coupled to threaded cavity 225. An apex of prosthesis 220 (when it generally defines a hollow semispherical shell) supports a structure that defines threaded cavity 225 and that structure may define a plane 235 that may be tangent to the apex, with plane 235 about perpendicular to axis 230 when rod 110 engages prosthesis 220. Operation of device 100 is designed to deliver only axial (e.g., aligned with axis 230 and thus non-torqueing) forces to prosthesis 220. Other embodiments illustrated in
Each pull of trigger 310 creates the same predetermined fixed unit of force (some alternatives may provide a variably predetermined force). The surgeon cannot deliver a misaligning impact to an impaction plate with this design.
It is believed that even a 0.1 degree mal-alignment on head 710 on trunnion taper 715 may lead to progressive wear and metalosis. Variations of the embodiments of devices illustrated in
Dot 810 can be aligned with an impactor/device/gun. Once axial alignment, such as through the sight channel, has been confirmed, a sledgehammer, a cockup gun, or other similar device can bang the impactor onto femoral (humeral) head 805 to impact it on trunnion taper 715. The co-axiality of the head and the device can be confirmed visually (for example, through a hollow cylinder that comprises a center shaft of the device) or with a variety of electronic and laser methods.
There is a secondary problem with the process of acetabular preparation and implantation that leads to cup mal-alignment. Currently, during the process of acetabular reaming, surgeons make several assumptions. One common assumption is that the reamer is fully seated in a cavity and surrounded on all sides by bone. Another common assumption is that the bone that is being reamed is uniform in density. Imagine a carpenter that is preparing to cut a piece of wood with a saw. Now imagine that parts of this piece of wood are embedded with cement and some parts of the piece of wood are hollow and filled with air. The carpenter's saw will not produce a precise cut on this object. Some parts are easy to cut, and some parts are harder to cut. The saw blades skives and bends in undesirable ways. A similar phenomenon happens in acetabular preparation with a reamer and when performing the cuts for knee replacement with a saw. With respect to the acetabulum, the side of the cavity that is incomplete (side of the reamer that is uncovered) will offer less resistance to the reamer and therefor the reamer preferentially reams towards the direction of the uncovering. Second, the reamer cuts the soft bone much more easily than the dense and sclerotic bone, so the reamer moves away from the sclerotic bone and moves toward the soft bone. From a machining perspective, the reaming and preparation of the acetabulum may not be concentric or precise. This may be a significant factor in the surgeon's inability to impact the cup in the desired location
Proposed is a method and a technique to eliminate/reduce this problem. Before the surgeon begins to ream the acetabulum, the reamer handle should be held, with an A-frame attached, in such a way to contemplate the final position of the reamer and hence the implant, (e.g., hold the reamer in 40-degree abduction and 20-degree anteversion reaming is started). This step could also be accomplished with navigation or fluoroscopy. The surgeon could, for example, immediately mark this position on a screen or the wall in the operating room as described below and as illustrated in
An alternative to that is also proposed to address this process. For example, at a proximal end of the reamer shaft handle will be placed a first reference system 1205, for example a laser pointer. This laser pointer 1205 will project a spot 1210 either on a wall or on a screen 1215, a known distance from the operating room table. That spot 1210 on wall 1215 (or on the screen) is then marked with another reference system 1220, for example a second independent laser pointer that sits on a steady stand in the operating room. Thereafter manipulating the shaft handle so that the first reference system has the desired relationship, example co-aligned, with the second reference system, the surgeon knows that the device attached to the handle has the desired orientation. So, when the first reamer is held in the anticipated and desired final alignment of the implant (e.g., 40-degree abduction, 20-degree anteversion for many preferred installation angles of an acetabular cup), the laser pointer at the proximal end of the reamer handle projects a spot on the wall or screen. That spot is marked with the second stationary laser and held for the duration of the case. All subsequent reamings will therefore not require an A-frame to get a sense of the proper alignment and direction of the reamer. The surgeon assures that no matter how he moves the reamer handle in the process of reaming of the acetabulum, that the reaming finishes with the reamer handle (laser pointer) pointing to the spot on the wall/screen. In this manner, directionality is assured during the reaming process. In this way the sinking path of the actual implant is somewhat predetermined. And no matter what final intra-operative monitoring technique is used (A-frame, C-Arm, Navigation) that the cup will likely seat/sink more closely to the desired final position.
A further option includes disposition of a sensor in the shaft of the ultrasonic reamers and saws so that the surgeon can ascertain when hard versus soft bone is being cut, adding a measure of safety by providing a visual numerical feedback as to the amount of pressure being utilized. This improvement (the ability to cut hard and soft bone with equal efficacy) will have tremendous implications in orthopedic surgery. When the acetabular cavity is prepared more precisely, with significantly lower tolerances, especially when directionality is observed, the acetabular implant (cup) may more easily follow the intended sinking path.
Other applications of this concept could be very useful. Pressfit and ingrowth fixation in total knee replacements in particular (as well as ankle, shoulder and other joints to a lesser degree) are fraught with problems, particularly that of inconsistent bony ingrowth and fixation. The fact that a surgeon is unable to obtain precise cuts on the bone may be a significant factor in why the bone ingrowth technology has not gotten off the ground in joints other than the hip. The problem is typically blamed on the surgeon and his less than perfect hands. The experienced surgeon boasts that only he should be doing this operation (i.e.: non-cemented total knee replacement). This concept (a more precise saw that cuts hard and soft bone equally allowing lower tolerances) has huge potential in orthopedics, in that it can lead to elimination of the use of cement in orthopedic surgery altogether. This can spark off the growth and use of bone ingrowth technology in all aspects of joint replacement surgery which can lead to tremendous time saving in the operating room and better results for the patients.
Regarding ultrasonic assisted bone preparation in orthopedics, there is a problem with preparation of bone in joint replacement: these procedures are typically performed using conventional orthopedic equipment such as 1) saw, 2) broach, 3) reamer, and 4) burr.
As noted below, these bone preparation tools may be enhanced by adding an additional vibratory motion component, preferably but not necessarily required, that is “orthogonal” to the conventional cutting motion. Saw 1400 includes a laterally reciprocating cutting blade that may be ultrasonically enhanced by an additional ultrasonic vibratory motion in one of the other five degrees of motion (e.g., vertical, longitudinal, or vibratory rotations of the blade such as pitch, yaw, and/or roll). Similarly, each of the conventional tools has a primary mode of freedom of motion for the bone processing and an enhancement may be made by adding an additional vibratory motion in one or more other modes of freedom. Embodiments of the present invention may include an additional vibratory motion, in the primary mode and/or the additional mode(s) that may be imperceptible visually (a very small amplitude and/or very fast about or beyond 20,000 hertz).
During bone preparation, two types of bony surfaces are generally encountered which include flat surfaces and contained surfaces. For the flat surfaces, seen in knee replacement, (end of the femur or the top of the tibia) saw 1400 is used to cut the bone. For the contained surfaces (such as the acetabulum and the proximal femur), as in hip replacement surgery, broach attachment 1500 or reamer 1600 is used to prepare the bone.
A problem with all of these techniques is that the density of the bone is not uniform between patients and even within the same compartment or joint of a single patient. The bone can be very soft or very hard and vary from region to region. With hard bone, saw 1400 may “skive” which causes an uneven cut surface and which minimizes that chance of successful “porous ingrowth”. This fact may be a principle reason that cement is still used in knee replacement. For the contained bone cavities such as the acetabulum and proximal femur a “goldilocks” situation exists. During preparation, a surgeon may desire to know how with confidence to prepare the bone to provide just the right amount of compressive (fit). Not too loose and not too tight. Too loose leads to loosening and potential infection of the prosthesis. Too tight leads to either poor seating (which can lead to failure of fixation) or fracture (which leads to loss of press fit fixation and loosening).
Current art does not provide a reliable and consistent tool or method for the orthopedic surgeon to reliably prepare a (variable density bone) in order to obtain a “perfect” fit for the prosthesis, whether the bone is flat as in the tibia in knee replacement or contained as in the acetabulum in hip replacement.
For contained cavities such as the acetabulum, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/234,782 filed 11 Aug. 2016 (all the content hereby expressly incorporated by reference thereto in its entirety) described a basic estimation of the compressive forces involved in bone. This was named a compressive force and developed an FR curve where FR is related Fn. Us; where Fn represents the normal forces and Us represents the coefficient of static friction. Vis a vis Hooke's law the FR=K·x·Us. Where K represents the material properties of bone (the spring like quality of bone) and x represents the amount of under-reaming of bone compared to an oversized prosthesis intended for press fit.
This current discussion mostly concerns itself with the variable “x” which represents the spring like quality of bone. In Hooke's law F=k·x; k is the spring's constant and x is amount of stretch placed on the spring. In orthopedic bone preparation k is represented by the material properties of bone and x is represented by the difference between the diameters of the prepared bone versus the prosthesis to be press fit.
As we have stated in the earlier papers, the surgeon and industry both appear to have a poor understanding of the basic science of the prosthesis/bone cavity interaction. It is believed that x can be more tightly and precisely machined to give a better tuning of the bone, which is to accept an oversized prosthesis.
BMD3 bidirectional vibratory tool for preparation of bone, and in particular the acetabular cavity: The use of an Acetabular Broach: a new idea. BMD3 bi-directional vibratory tool can be used for preparation of bone (any cavity of bone that needs to be prepared for application of a prosthesis, but especially the acetabulum, as well as the proximal femur, proximal tibia, proximal humerus, and any other long bone in the body that receives a prosthesis). With regards to the acetabulum, unlike the other bones discussed above, this structure has never before been prepared with a broach, but rather always prepared with a hemispherical “cheese grater type” reamers that rotates in one direction (forward). We are proposing that the acetabulum be prepared with a broach using one of the two degrees of freedom for oscillation
(1. Longitudinal and 2. rotational), utilizing a bidirectional BMD vibratory tool. The outer surface of this broach will very closely resemble the rough surface of the prosthesis, with high coefficient of static friction. We have seen this method in action in our experiments, particularly at higher frequencies of around 300 hertz, and believe that this method of acetabular preparation will provide a cut surface that is much more precise and conferring the ability to produce lower tolerances. This method may also allow preparation of acetabular cavity in “half” sizes. Currently the cavity is reamed in 1 mm intervals. It may be much easier to prepare the acetabulum with ½ mm interval broaches than ½ mm reamers. Half size broaching may dramatically improve the ability of the surgeon to cut and prepare the acetabular precisely and at lower tolerances.
For purposes of review we recall the equation FR=K·x·Us. Where x is represents the amount of under reaming and the shape of the cup being inserted.
X is controlled by the amount of under or over reaming of the acetabulum. In the past when the surfaces of the cup were not as rough (lower coefficient of static friction, i.e. Zimmer Fiber Metal cup), surgeons used to under ream by 2 mm. Now most companies recommend under reaming by 1 mm, since the surfaces of most cups are much rougher with better porosity characteristics that allow better and quicker bony ingrowth. Sometimes when the surgeon has difficulty seating the cup, he/she reams line to line, and describes this action as “touching up the rim”. This action however, many times, eliminates the compressive quality of the acetabulum by decreasing the value of x towards zero. This issue brings attention to the problem that we have described which is that the surgeon does not have anything but a most basic understanding of the spring like qualities of bone. If he/she is can understand the basic science involved in this system, he can then use the proper tools to appropriately fine tune the pelvis for a good press fit fixation, without fear of under seating or fracture. There is a huge market need for better tools to prepare (fine tune) the acetabulum, for good press fit fixation.
Current techniques utilize ‘cheese grater type’ hemispherical reamers to prepare the bed of the acetabulum. As discussed in our BMD4 paper the quality of acetabular bone can be drastically different between patients and even within the same patient, particularly at different locations around the acetabular fossa. Some parts of the bone are soft, and some are hard. Current cheese grater hemispherical reamers come in 1 mm intervals. This creates two specific problems: 1. The current acetabular reamers in 1 mm intervals for preparation of the acetabular bone do not provide the ability to precisely machine the acetabulum, and obtain lower tolerances, and therefore proper tuning of the pelvic bone. 2. No method exists to cut hard and soft bone with the same level of effectiveness, i.e.: hard bone always pushes the reamers towards the soft bone which ends up being chewed up more, and in that sense, a perfect hemisphere is not created with current cheese grater reaming techniques. We therefore are proposing two distinct and separate solutions which we believe can remedy this problem of poor-quality acetabular preparation.
The following further elaborates upon ultrasonic assisted preparing, milling, burring, sawing, broaching, reaming, and the like in order to obtain a more precise and efficient process of bone preparation in joint replacement surgery.
Another important advance in orthopedics is the use of robotics in the operating room. Sensors and computer-controlled electromechanical devices are integrated into a robot with a haptic sense, where robotic manipulators now have a complete spatial sense of the patient's bone in the operating room, sometimes to within a half millimeter of accuracy.
Currently robots such as the Stryker Mako robot use a standard rotating burr, reamer or a standard saw to prepare the bone for application of a knee or hip prosthesis. The term “robot” has a special meaning in the context of preparation of live bone in a living patient. Currently it is impermissible to automate any cutting of the live bone. Robot in this sense operates as a realtime constraint that provides haptic feedback to the surgeon during use when certain movements of the processing tool are outside predetermined limits.
An advantage of the robot is that it is helps in processing bone to within less than half a millimeter. This means that the surgeon cannot easily push the burr, reamer or saw out of the allowed haptic plane. In a sense, with the robot, the cutting tool is in safer hands. These standard tools (burr, saw, reamer) provide no particular advantage for the robotic system, that is, the conventional robotic system uses conventional tools with the constraint haptic system. A disadvantage of the robot is that the process of cutting bone with a burr, saw and reamers are very inefficient (slow) especially in hard sclerotic bone. The robot is also very a bulky piece of equipment that adds time to the operation. Mako or other robotic knee surgeries have been somewhat adopted in the uni-compartmental knee replacement procedures (less than 10% of surgeons) and is currently being investigated for use in total knee replacement (Not yet in general markets). The use of the Mako robot in hip replacement however, has shown a very poor adoption rate; less than 0.01% of surgeons have used the Mako robot for hip replacement. Some of the weakness of this robotic procedure is in the process of 1. bone preparation and 2. the actual insertion of the prosthesis into bone.
Earlier tools have addressed tools for installing an acetabular cup into the bony cavity with either “vibratory-BMD3” technique or “discrete impact-BMD4” technique. These solutions are believed to largely eliminate the problems associated with insertion of the prosthesis, providing the ability not only to insert but also to position the prosthesis in proper alignment. Other tools have dealt with manipulating the value of Us, coefficient of static friction, during a process of insertion.
An embodiment of the present invention may include a better job of preparation of bone. In effect, some embodiments provide a tool or process that more precisely manipulates the value of x in the formula: FR=K·x·Us. A goal of some embodiments of the present invention is to obtain lower (tighter tolerances) and do it more quickly, with different tools and methods such as disclosed herein.
An embodiment of the present invention may include bone preparation using robotic surgery through use of haptic control and management to provide an unprecedented level of safety and accuracy coupled with modified equipment that more efficiently prepares in-patient bone while offering novel solutions for bone preparation. In some of these implementations the robotic haptic feedback may be exploited by addition and utilization of a more powerful and efficient bone cutting tool/method never before used or contemplated in orthopedics as it would have been too easy to mis-process a bone portion.
Ultrasonic motion may be added to traditional bone processing tools (e.g., to the tools of
Specifically, in hip replacement surgery the traditional reamer, broach or burr can each be equipped with an ultrasonic transducer to provide an additional ultrasonic vibratory motion (e.g., longitudinal axial ultrasonic vibration). These new cutting methods can then be incorporated within, or in association with, a robot that only allows operation of the tool within safe haptic zones. This ultrasonic robotic cutting tool is therefore more powerful, fast and precise. It would cut hard and soft bone with equal efficiency. Additionally, the robotic operation of an ultrasonic assisted cutting tool is safe, in that the robot does not allow operation of the tool outside of the haptic safe planes.
For example, a Mako robot may be equipped with a rotatory ultrasonic bone preparation tool, operating a bone processing tool (such as single metal-bonded diamond abrasive burr) that is ultrasonically vibrated, for example in the axial direction while the burr is rotated about this axis. This tool can prepare both the proximal femur and acetabulum quickly with extreme precise. This tool and method therefore do away with the standard manual broaching techniques used for femoral preparation and the standard reaming techniques used for acetabular preparation.
An implementation of this system of a constrained ultrasonic vibration of a bone processing tool such as a rotating burr enables a three-dimensional bone-sculpting tool or a smart tool robot. The sculpting tool and smart tool robot may allow a surgeon to accurately, quickly, and safely provide non-planar contours when cutting bones as further described below while also potentially replacing all the conventional preparation tools of
The addition of the ultrasonic bone preparation tool to a robot makes the system a truly efficient and precise tool. The surgeon can sculpt the surfaces of the bone, for example a femur, tibia or an acetabulum and the like, and in some implementations any tissue may be sculpted with the sculpting tool, with high degree of accuracy and speed.
With current tools, it would take too much time to perform such bone preparation with a burr, making the operation extremely slow and adding risk to the patient and is therefore not performed. Some implementations include an addition of an improved bone processing tool to any haptically constrained system will make the preparation of bone for joint replacement easy, fast and efficient, ultimately delivering on the promise of a better, faster and more precise operation.
With respect to knee and shoulder replacement, some of the bone surfaces are flat which have led to prosthetic designs that have a flat undersurface, and the decision to prepare these bones with a saw. One concept is to add ultrasonic axial vibrations to the saw for a more effective cut.
Ultrasonic enhancement may be added to all current bone removal techniques in orthopedics, including the burr, saw, reamer, and the broach, making all of these bone preparation tools more effective.
In some instances, use of the same burr described above (e.g., a rotating tool with metal-bonded diamond abrasives that is ultrasonically vibrated in the axial direction) to prepare surfaces of the tibia, femur and the glenoid in the shoulder for mating to an implant surface. One important benefit of use of such a burr is that the surgeon and the smart tool robot can now very quickly and effectively machine these mating surfaces any way desired, potentially introducing waves and contours that can match the undersurface of the prosthesis (which itself has been created with waves and contours for additional stability. Portions of the tibia and the glenoid in the shoulder are flat bones that do not have inherent stability. These bones are prepared in such a way to accept a prosthesis with a flat surface. With the advent of high-power 3D bone sculpting, 3D printing, and smart tool haptic constraint, the sculpting/smart tool system may create prostheses that have waves and contours on their bottom surface to enhance stability when mated. For example, a bone surface may be 3D sculpted/contoured and a prosthesis produced to match the profile, or a preformed contoured prosthesis may be provided with a non-flat profile and the mating bone surface may be sculpted/contoured to match the preformed non-flat prosthesis mating surface, particularly for the “flat ended” bone and the associated prostheses. These contouring profiles for bone and implant mating surfaces are not limited to “flat ended” bones and may have benefit in other implants or bone mating surface.
These changes can enhance the initial fixation of the prosthesis to bone by creating contact surface areas which are more resistant to shear forces. This may provide a specific advantage for the tibial component in knee and the glenoid component in shoulder replacement surgery. These prostheses generally have flat undersurfaces and are less inherently stable. They can be made significantly more stable with the suggested changes in the method of bone preparation and prosthesis fabrication.
Components 1800 include a bone B (e.g., a tibia) having a flat end 1805. Flat end 1805 is typically removed by a conventional version of saw 1400, to allow an implant 1810 to be installed. In the conventional process, bone B is prepared having a flat/planar bone mating surface 1815 which matches a flat/planar implant mating surface 1820 of implant 1810. As noted, the pair of mated surfaces may exhibit instability, especially with lateral shear loading.
Components of 1900 include bone B that has been prepared differently by removing flat end 1805 using an orthopedic sculpting system as described herein. The sculpting system enables use of an implant 1905 that includes a contoured (non-flat/planar) implant mating surface 1910. A bone mating surface 1915 produced by the orthopedic sculpting system is contoured to match/complement implant mating surface 1910. Components 1900 may include a preformed implant 1905 and surface 1915 is sculpted to match/complement for bonding or surface 1915 is sculpted and surface 1910 is thereafter formed to match/complement surface 1915. An additive/subtractive manufacturing process may be used to make surface 1910 and/or implant 1905. For example, implant 1905 may include two portions—a premade head portion and a later-formed body portion that may be contoured or manufactured as needed to produce surface 1910, with the head portion and body portion joined together to produce implant 1905
Bone ingrowth technology has not enjoyed that same success in shoulder and knee replacement surgery as it has done in hip replacement surgery. One reason that this may be true is because current methods do not allow precise and uniform preparation of bone due to variable density of bone, and especially on the flat surfaces. The ultrasonic assisted bone preparation (example, the orthopedic sculpting system or smart tool robot) discussed herein has a potential to solve this problem of inconsistent bone preparation. The use of the above bone preparation method/tools instead of the standard techniques may represent a disruptive technology. The ability to quickly machine bone, and to do it in an extremely precise and safe manner may eliminate the need for bone cement in joint replacement surgery. This fact can cause an explosion in the use of porous ingrowth prosthesis/technology in orthopedics joint replacement surgery.
Linkage 2010, illustrated as including a mechanically limited articulating arm, is coupled to both controller 2005 and tool 2015. In some cases when processing a particular in-patient bone, controller 2005 may predefine a set of bone regions of the in-patient bone for a processing (e.g., a cutting, a removing, a reaming, a sawing, a broaching, a burring, and the like). Controller 2005 may monitor a relative location of implement 2020 relative to a particular portion of the in-patient bone to be processed and compare that particular portion with the predefined regions. Those predefined regions may include a first subset of regions to be processed by implement 2020 and in some cases also include (or alternatively substitute for the first subset) a second subset of regions not to be processed by implement 2020. Controller 2005 provides a realtime feedback to the user regarding an appropriateness or desirability of processing each the particular portion of bone at the location of implement 2020.
In some cases, the realtime feedback may include a realtime haptic signal imparted from controller 2005 through linkage 2010 to tool 2015. That haptic signal may be of sufficient strength to significantly restrict an ability of an operator to casually move implement 2020 to a region of the in-patient bone that is not to be processed, and some cases may essentially prevent or inhibit the locating of implement 2020 to those regions of the in-patient that are not to be processed.
Other feedback signals may be included in addition, or in lieu of, the haptic system. Audio feedback may in some cases be sufficient to provide feedback to an operator.
Tool 2015 may be an embodiment of an ultrasonically enhanced bone preparation tool which operates implement 2020. Tool 2015 includes a motive system that operates implement 2020 with a bone processing motion. The bone processing motion includes a primary motion having a primary freedom of motion (e.g., for a burr as illustrated, the primary motion may include a rotation about a longitudinal axis, this primary motion having a freedom of motion that includes the rotation about the longitudinal axis). The bone processing motion includes a secondary motion having a secondary freedom of motion, the secondary freedom of motion different from the first freedom of motion. The secondary motion includes an ultrasonic vibratory motion that enhances the bone-preparation of implement 2020 than would be the case of the primary motion alone.
Different implements and tools may include varying primary and secondary motions, there generally being six freedom of motion possibilities for the primary or secondary motions: x, y, and z translations and rotations about any of the x, y, and z axes. Typically, the primary motion will include a repetitive (and sometimes reciprocating) component.
An operator grips tool 2015 and manipulates it by hand. Controller 2005 automatically monitors these manipulations to establish a relative location of implement 2020 with respect to a particular portion of an in-patient bone. Comparison of the relative location to predetermined/premapped regions of the in-patient bone that identify processable/non-proces sable regions results in controller 2020 is used to provide appropriate realtime feedback signals to the operator for each particular portion of bone.
Oscillating (sometimes referred to as sagittal) saws are frequently used in sectioning bones during total knee and hip arthroplasty. Standard oscillating saws utilize an electric motor to generate rotatory motion which is coupled to an eccentric mechanism the produces oscillatory side to side motion (i.e., a sagittal motion) which operate at frequencies of about 10,000 to 20,000 cycles per minute (cpm), at a relatively small angle of 3 to 6 degrees within a plane defined by the flat blade.
High oscillations over a short stroke length of 3 mm to 7 mm produces significant friction and heat generation potentially causing necrosis of osteocytes and bone cells, which may adversely affect bone ingrowth and osteointegration into any porous surfaces of implants installed in sectioned bone.
Superimposition of ultrasonic/near ultrasonic oscillations (with frequencies in the order of 20 kHz to 50 kHz and amplitudes of between 15 μm to 150 μm) on top of the sagittal motion or sagittal-like motion of an improved sagittal saw are included as embodiments and implementations of the present invention. For example, an addition of axial ultrasonic oscillations to the sagittal saw motion may produce a smoother cut with lower temperatures that is associated with decreased cutting force, increased cutting efficiency and material removal rate. It is also the case that addition of such an axial ultrasonic energy to the action of the sagittal saw may produce a smoother cut with smaller chip size and less subsurface damage to the bone being sectioned. This would have significant positive ramifications by minimizing heat generation, decreasing a risk cell death from heat, and decreasing a potential loss of vascularity of bone, which may lead to enhanced healing of implants to bone sectioned with the improved sagittal saw.
Generally, a housing includes a set of motive components, including a primary motion motive and one or more secondary motion motives, coupled to an adapter, the adapter attached/coupled to the sagittal saw blade. The conventional sagittal saw blade is typically a rectilinear arrangement including a long and thin structure configured for mechanical removal (e.g., chipping) of bone. A longitudinal axis extends along a longest distance (length) dimension, a lateral axis, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, extends along an intermediate distance (width) dimension, and a yaw axis, perpendicular the other axes, extends along a shortest distance (thickness) dimension. The sagittal saw provides a primary sagittal motion for the sagittal blade in a sagittal plane containing the longitudinal and lateral axes. This primary sagittal motion is configured to section a bone upon application of the sagittal blade to the bone. Blade motion includes displacement and/or rotation in any of these three axes (e.g., the 3-6-degree rotation about the yaw axis within the sagittal plane defined by the longitudinal and lateral axes). Some profiles may include pure displacement along one or more axes, pure rotation about one or more axes, or some combination.
The ultrasonic component may be produced by piezoelectric structures, such as crystals, ceramics, transducers, motors, spindles, or ceramics which produce a mechanical strain with applied electrical field; or more complex piezoelectric producing structures such as piezoelectric stacks, piezoelectric actuators, piezoelectric ultrasonic spindles, all of which produce higher efficiency (amplitude and frequency) ultrasonic vibrations.
Superimposed on this primary sagittal motion is a secondary motion that includes a set of driven vibrations configured to enhance the sectioning ability of the primary sagittal motion, the secondary motion may be constrained within the sagittal plane as well, but may include some motion component in the pitch axis as well. Disclosed herein are embodiments wherein the set of driven vibrations includes ultrasonic or near-ultrasonic motions with an amplitude at least 12 kHz to 17 kHz at the lower subsonic limit, and preferably at least 20 kHz for ultrasonic implementations and more preferably at least 20 kHz to 40 kHz.
The sagittal motions are generated by motive components that may be disposed in a series arrangement, in a parallel arrangement, or in a hybrid arrangement including some series and parallel cooperating arrangement.
Multiple specific design embodiments of the improved sagittal saw are described herein.
In one specific design embodiment, a saw having a primary eclectic rotatory motor is coupled with an eccentric mechanism that provides rapid oscillations at high frequency in the order of 10,000 to 20,000 oscillations per minute cpm in a relatively small angle that moves the sagittal blade about a center of oscillation where coupled to a drive mechanism that includes the eccentric mechanism. The eccentric mechanism is then attached to an elongated horn having a first broad horn end and a second narrow horn end wherein the second horn end is attached to the operative tip, and the first horn end extends through the axial bore of a piezoelectric transducer element and is attached to the transducer element, wherein a broad portion includes a first nodal point of the elongated horn and the narrow portion includes a second nodal point of the elongated horn. The elongated horn is coupled to the operative tip (e.g., sagittal saw blade). There are many conventional means to capture the sagittal saw blade, including but not limited to male female threads or a clamping jaw. Ultrasonic sagittal saw blades are designed for ultrasonic machines and should be made of high strength material such as titanium, cobalt chrome, or stainless steel. Standard sagittal saw blades can be used with the addition of an ultrasonic adaptor that provides proper tuning of the blade.
A primary motor may or may not include desynchronization or decoupling elements between various drive components, such as the primary engine and the eccentric mechanism to allow a for desynchronization of oscillations from the primary motive engine to the eccentric mechanism.
A second embodiment of the ultrasonic sagittal saw attaches the eccentric mechanism distal to an ultrasonic transducer and horn. The second embodiment has a primary motor coupled to a rotating (plate/arm, collectively referred to as a cover) which is coupled to a proximal nodal point of the elongated horn through elastic elements that minimize contact area, which minimize loss of ultrasonic energy.
The horn is attached to a piezoelectric transducer/actuator through the axial bore of the piezoelectric transducer element (generally ceramic piezoelectric transducer, but not limited to ceramic—many different kinds available including piezo and non-piezo technologies for production/generation of desired driven vibratory motion as described herein).
The saw has a housing that is attached to the primary motor proximally and attached to the distal nodal point of the elongated horn through elastic elements that minimize contact area and minimize loss of ultrasonic energy.
The distal aspect of the horn is attached to an eccentric mechanism that converts the now combined (subsonic rotatory and ultrasonic axial motion) into rapid side to side oscillations that will contain axial ultrasonic oscillations with frequencies of up to 20 kHz to 50 kHz and amplitudes of between 15 μm to 150 μm. The eccentric mechanism may produce a third nodal point for the acoustic waves. The eccentric mechanism attaches either to a specialty saw blade made for ultrasonic operation or to a specialized ultrasonic adaptor that allows use of standard blades. The dimensions of the horn/adaptor/blade or (horn/blade) complex are tuned for desired frequency and displacement at the tip of the cutting implement (saw). A cooling system provides cool air/liquid through a tubing system and subsequently through special slot in the blade to the blade tip-bone interface to counteract heat generation.
Motive components may include a wide range of motors and actuators. There are generic mechanical templates for producing vibratory forces and motions as described herein. One mechanical template may convert a rotary motion of an engine (e.g., a rotary motor) into a motion of an adapter, such as one coupled to a sagittal saw blade. Another mechanical template for a mechanical device may convert a pneumatic engine into motion of an adapter. Still another mechanical template may convert motion of an actuator (e.g., a piezo electric actuator) into a motion of an adapter. The systems are variations on the theme of conversion of one motion of a motive component into motion of the adapter. An engine that produces the vibration or motivation that results in driving the bone preparation implement into bone for sectioning could be of any variety including a brush DC motor, stepper motor, piezo (ultrasonic) motor producing sub sonic or ultrasonic motion, single and stacked piezoelectric materials and crystals, ultrasonic spindles, brushless DC motor, linear motor (actuators) or pneumatic motor, or combinations thereof, for example, and which may or may not require an intermediary motivation processor (e.g., a linear motion converter) to produce vibrations applied to the sagittal saw blade directly or indirectly through an adapter coupling, from motivations from the engine through a pulse transfer mechanism which may include the adapter. These motors can all produce a pulsation or set of motivations that can be transferred through a “pulse transfer system” to the entire adapter/implement/blade, the profile of the force applied to the adapter/implement/blade may include or consist of a set of intentional driven vibration components in any of one to six degrees of freedom and combinations thereof. In some implementations, the entire blade moves in unison in one or more six degrees of freedom, and in other implementations different parts of the entire blade may move at different velocities in one or more degrees of freedom.
Drive 2110 imparts a desired drive profile to blade 2105 through adapter 2115, the drive profile predominately, if not exclusively, is contained within the sagittal plane. The drive profile including a primary drive motion and a secondary drive motion, operates blade 2105 to remove bone when blade 2105 is applied to a portion of bone. This bone removal may include mechanical removal, cavitation/emulsification removal, or both, among other bone removal methodologies.
The primary drive motion or the secondary drive motion (or both) may include subsonic or ultrasonic drive components contributing to a driven vibratory motion of blade 2105 during bone removal operations. Driven vibrations are in contrast to passive or secondary effects of a driven system which may be simply dampened by contact of blade 2105 to bone. As discussed herein, an amplitude/effectiveness of the vibratory motion(s) is/are not functionally degraded during the active sectioning of the bone with application of the implement against the bone.
These motors can all produce a pulsation or set of motivations that can be transferred through a “pulse transfer system” to the entire implant or bone preparation implement, the profile of the force applied to the entire implant/implement may include or consist of a set of intentional driven vibration components in any of one to six degrees of freedom and combinations thereof.
An embodiment of the present invention may provide a blade profile that includes a blade oscillation at a rate of 10,000 to 40,000 oscillations per minute at an angle of 4-6 degrees and have an axial ultrasonic oscillation of 20 kHz to 40 kHz with amplitudes of 10 μm to 150 Mm directly superimposed on it. For series coupled motive components that are commutative, an order of generation of primary or secondary motions produces a same superimposed motion of the adapter (and of the blade). For commutative motives, order does not matter. In some systems, it may be that order variations produce different superimposed motions (non-commutative motives).
The motive, and motive components, may be configured with various rotary motive elements that include a conversion of these motive elements into the desired primary and secondary motions in the one or more freedoms of motion (e.g., X-axis, Y-axis, and/or Z-axis displacement(s) and/or rotation(s). The motive, and motive components, may also be configured with various linear motive elements that may directly produce these desired primary and secondary motions. In other cases, the various linear motive elements may indirectly produce these desired primary and secondary motions, such as through amplitude boosting or amplification, or other motion conversions.
For example, one primary motive component may include a linear motor driving a primary motion of the adapter (and thus the entire cutting implement coupled to the adapter) and another motive component may include some other motor (rotary, linear, or other) producing one or more motion elements of the secondary motion. This arrangement could be reversed as to primary and secondary motion motives, among other motive, motive component, and motion variations.
Applying and superimposing a desired sub-component (e.g., ultrasonic) of the final motion profile, with other motions (e.g., primary motion) from off-implement motives to the bone preparation implement through the adapter, for example by moving the adapter, enables a greater range of motion than may be possible with one or more motive components disposed on the blade. In some applications, the bone-processing implement is required to be disposable after each procedure. Incorporating motive components into a disposable bone-processing implement increases the costs of using such an implement. Decreased and less effective motive options and increased costs associated with disposing of more expensive blades likely decrease adoption of on-blade motive solutions. An embodiment of the present invention does not include any motive components on the preparation implement and all driven motions (primary and secondary for example) are provided from off the blade through the adapter that releasably engages and secures the bone preparation implement during application of the motions to the implement through the adapter. This adapter is separate and distinct from the cutting implement and may, in some implements, help to tune the cutting implement for certain motions (e.g., ultrasonic motion).
Saw 2500 further includes a second motive component in the set of series-coupled motive components. This second motive component produces driven vibratory motion superimposed on the primary cutting motion for a vibratory motion profile to be applied to blade 2105. Second motive component may include a vibration motive 2515 which produces an initial driven vibratory motion, such as subsonic, near ultrasonic, and/or supersonic/ultrasonic motion. For ultrasonic initial driven vibratory motion, vibration motive 2515 may include piezo generators as described herein (e.g., crystals, ceramics, transducers, actuators, motors, spindles, and the like) producing an initial vibratory motion. Second motive component may further include a motion booster 2520 and/or motion amplifier 2525 to increase an amplitude of the initial vibratory motion producing an amplified vibratory motion as the driven vibratory motion. Motion amplifier 2525 for ultrasonic motion may include an ultrasonic horn that tunes the vibratory ultrasonic motion for the operational frequency and blade 2105.
An adapter 2530, coupled to blade 2105, applies the vibratory profile generated from the series-coupled motive components to the entire blade 2105. Adapter 2530, and one or more elements of the series-coupled motive components, may be used to tune ultrasonic frequencies/motion.
An adapter 2740 couples the drive to blade 2735 so that motion produced from the drive is applied to blade 2735. The drive may include an eccentric element 2745 to further modify a rotation motion in the drive to a desired blade profile motion applied to blade 2735.
In some embodiments saw 2700 may include an optional cooling system including a fluid reservoir 2750 and a fluid conduit 2755 directing contents of reservoir 2750 to a fluid channel 2760 disposed within blade 2735. The fluid in reservoir may be a liquid or gas to help reduce any heat generated during operation of saw 2700 during bone preparation.
In some embodiments, a bone preparation tool may include a temperature sensor for measuring a temperature. The temperature may be of the bone preparation implement or of the in-patient bone being processed by the tool. The temperature may be measured directly or indirectly, by a contact sensor or remote temperature sensing.
Bone can be classified by its level of compactness (density). Also, the osteons in bone may have different configurations as seen in wood. Certain bones, based upon bone density among other factors, may benefit from different bone preparation processes, cutting tools, and cutting forces having density-tuned variations of vibration superimposed on a primary bone preparation motion of a bone preparation implement.
An embodiment of the present invention may include orthopedic cutting implements (e.g., saws, burrs, reamers, broaches and reamers) that include driven vibrations that may be tuned (e.g., based on bone density) with various single or combination vibratory motion in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes.
For example, certain bones may be more easily prepared (e.g., cut) with addition of a single plane ultrasonic vibration. Some of the more compact bones may be more efficiently cut with addition of a combination of ultrasonic plane vibrations.
For example, nine different combinations of ultrasonic tuning may be added to an orthopedic bone preparation implement to increase preparation efficiency, while reducing preparation force, and reducing risks of heat generation, subsurface damage, and delamination, while potentially preserving osteocyte health and vascularity producing a smoother finish with smaller cutting chips.
A particular set of tuned vibratory motions, subsonic, near ultrasonic, and ultrasonic for example, or a particular implement, bone, and bone preparation profile (e.g., a resection when cutting bone, a reaming when preparing a cavity for an acetabular cup, a broaching for a long bone channel. These sets of tuned vibratory motions are likened to a “symphony” of secondary motions/frequencies that may be specialized and superimposed on a primary bone preparation motion/implement. The specifics of each symphony may be based on many factors, including a compactness (density) of bone and a configuration and alignment of osteons at the bone preparation site.
Primary vibratory addition may be axial, coronal, and/or sagittal in the order 15 to 150 μm. Secondary vibratory superposition may be in the order of 4 to 20 μm in one or more of these planes. One or more secondary vibrations may be added based on the compactness of bone or the positioning and alignment of these osteons. The same tool may include a controller that adjusts these magnitudes in the various planes to allow the tool to be used with different bone density configurations or bone preparation actions.
As used herein, this bone-tuning may sometimes be referred to herein as bandwidth ultrasonic tuning of orthopedic bone preparation and bone preparation instruments and implements.
An embodiment of bandwidth ultrasonic tuning may employ piezo elements as described herein for production of the desired vibratory motion(s). These elements may be arranged in one, two, or three different orthogonal planes to produce any combination of superimposed driven vibrations that may be superimposed on orthopedic instruments and bone preparation implements.
Some studies of orthogonal bone machining and shallow depths of cut per tooth encountered in sagittal sawing, suggest that a specific cutting energy during bone sawing is expected to be quite high.
Therefore, it may be the case that a significant axial/forward thrust force will be required to cause a saw blade tooth to plunge into a surface of a bone being resectioned, rather than simply riding along the bone surface and causing frictional heating. There may be a tight window of operation where a sufficient dynamic thrust force is required to initiate bone chipping, but not so aggressive as to promote rebounding of the blade from the workpiece. With the shallow depths of cut experienced in sawing, the inhomogeneous microstructure of bone is of some interest as it may affect an ability of a tooth of a saw blade or rigid chipping element of other bone preparation implements to penetrate the surface of the bone at the bone preparation site.
In some models, a microstructure of bone may be viewed as more analogous to wood than metal, with cortical bone osteons aligned parallel to an axis of a long bone just as wood fibers are aligned parallel to the axis of a tree trunk. The orientation of osteons has an effect on bone cutting rates and forces not unlike that experienced when ripping or crosscutting wood. Osteons in cortical bone are approximately 50 lm to 400 lm in diameter, which is approximately an order of magnitude greater than depths of cut per tooth experienced in sagittal sawing. Therefore, knowledge of factors that may influence chip creation under particular conditions when cutting osteons may be important to understanding improved sawing and preparation of cortical bones.
A DOE approach was pursued by Yeager et al. to study the effect of bone orientation on cutting forces at various depths of cut. It was concluded that sample orientation, relative to the primary osteon direction, and depth of cut were statistically significant factors influencing cutting forces. Using an electron microscope to examine the surface of freshly cut bone, the authors observed severe deformation, described as “crushed,” when cutting with negative rake angle tools. They concluded that under these circumstances, bone debris was formed through the fracture of osteons. Since saw blade teeth normally have negative rake angles, i.e., the teeth are symmetrical and designed to cut in both directions, saw blade teeth may facilitate osteon cracking during cutting.
Sugita and Mitsuishi observed cracks forming along osteon boundaries while viewing transverse cutting of bovine cortical bone under high magnification. From their microscopic observations of bone fracturing, they proposed a machining method whereby the cutting edge is forced into the surface of the bone and then concurrently advanced and lifted to create chips due to fracturing between and across osteons. The cutting motion proposed by Sugita and Mitsuishi is similar to that produced by the new sagittal sawing device with figure-eight orbital blade motion.
Correlation between the shape of the figure-eight blade path and the temperature in the surrounding bone is fertile ground for additional research. While the cutting rate of cortical bone with an orbital blade trajectory was shown to be greater than the cutting rate with traditional oscillatory blade motion, this does not immediately support the conjecture that greater cutting rates produce lower cutting temperatures. The creation of larger chips may carry more heat away from the cutting zone as hypothesized, but there is also more work being done by the blade in the cutting zone and this could produce additional heating.
The following references provide additional information that may be related to one or more of the embodiments and variations thereof, these references are expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes:
The system and methods above have been described in general terms as an aid to understanding details of preferred embodiments of the present invention. In the description herein, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of components and/or methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present invention. Some features and benefits of the present invention are realized in such modes and are not required in every case. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that an embodiment of the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other apparatus, systems, assemblies, methods, components, materials, parts, and/or the like. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not specifically shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of embodiments of the present invention.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, or “a specific embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention and not necessarily in all embodiments. Thus, respective appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment”, or “in a specific embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics of any specific embodiment of the present invention may be combined in any suitable manner with one or more other embodiments. It is to be understood that other variations and modifications of the embodiments of the present invention described and illustrated herein are possible in light of the teachings herein and are to be considered as part of the spirit and scope of the present invention.
It will also be appreciated that one or more of the elements depicted in the drawings/figures can also be implemented in a more separated or integrated manner, or even removed or rendered as inoperable in certain cases, as is useful in accordance with a particular application.
Additionally, any signal arrows in the drawings/Figures should be considered only as exemplary, and not limiting, unless otherwise specifically noted. Combinations of components or steps will also be considered as being noted, where terminology is foreseen as rendering the ability to separate or combine is unclear.
The foregoing description of illustrated embodiments of the present invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed herein. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes only, various equivalent modifications are possible within the spirit and scope of the present invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize and appreciate. As indicated, these modifications may be made to the present invention in light of the foregoing description of illustrated embodiments of the present invention and are to be included within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Thus, while the present invention has been described herein with reference to particular embodiments thereof, a latitude of modification, various changes and substitutions are intended in the foregoing disclosures, and it will be appreciated that in some instances some features of embodiments of the invention will be employed without a corresponding use of other features without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth. Therefore, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the essential scope and spirit of the present invention. It is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular terms used in following claims and/or to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any and all embodiments and equivalents falling within the scope of the appended claims. Thus, the scope of the invention is to be determined solely by the appended claims.
This Application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 16/589,099 filed on Sep. 30, 2019; application Ser. No. 16/589,099 is a Continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 16/276,639 filed on Feb. 15, 2019; application Ser. No. 16/276,639 is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 15/398,996 filed on Jan. 5, 2017; application Ser. No. 15/398,996 is a Continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 15/202,434 filed on Jul. 5, 2016; and application Ser. No. 15/202,434 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 62/277,294 filed on Jan. 11, 2016; all of which are hereby expressly incorporated in their entireties by reference thereto for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1455621 | Joyner | May 1923 | A |
| 2121193 | Erich | Jun 1938 | A |
| 3412733 | Ross | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3818514 | Clark | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3874003 | Moser et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4135517 | Reale | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4301551 | Dore et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4341206 | Perrett et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4457306 | Borzone | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4530114 | Tepic | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4608019 | Kumabe | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4608053 | Keller | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4712951 | Brown | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4728329 | Mansat | Mar 1988 | A |
| 5108400 | Appel et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5133765 | Cuilleron | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5318570 | Hood et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5358532 | Evans et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5431657 | Rohr | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5534006 | Szabo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5591164 | Nazre et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5665091 | Noble et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5693088 | Lazarus | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702473 | Albrektsson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5713901 | Tock | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5769092 | Williamson, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5806518 | Mittelstadt | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5849015 | Haywood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5980528 | Salys | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6048365 | Burrows et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6110179 | Flivik et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6146425 | Hoermansdoerfer | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6161545 | Chow | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6197062 | Fenlin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6204592 | Hur | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6231612 | Balay et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6585771 | Buttermilch et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6659997 | Casutt | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 7036211 | Panks | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7645281 | Marik | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7875083 | Sudmann | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8167823 | Nycz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8328849 | Nydegger et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8603100 | Muller | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8876529 | Mayer et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9211362 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9232968 | Moumene et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9999518 | Mani et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10251663 | Behzadi | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 10299930 | Behzadi | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10849766 | Behzadi | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10864083 | Behzadi | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10905456 | Behzadi | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10912655 | Behzadi et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 11026809 | Behzadi et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11717310 | Behzadi | Aug 2023 | B2 |
| 20020082695 | Neumann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183851 | Spiegelberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030065398 | Cueille et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229357 | Dye | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019382 | Amirouche et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044397 | Stinson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097952 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004680 | Saladino et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012610 | Liao et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050015154 | Lindsey et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101962 | Schwenke et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154398 | Miniaci et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209597 | Long et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060015110 | Pepper | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142754 | Irion et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189989 | Bert | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247638 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005144 | Leisinger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162038 | Tuke | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219641 | Dorr et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233131 | Song et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080091271 | Bonitati et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109085 | Tulkis et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234833 | Bandoh et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255560 | Myers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090112265 | Hudgins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192626 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248083 | Patterson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292321 | Collette | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023014 | Romagnoli et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152566 | Rains et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249796 | Nycz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004318 | Tulkis et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178521 | Siravo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264009 | Walter et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120172939 | Pedicini | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209277 | Leparmentier et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215257 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330429 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130204264 | Mani et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211535 | Cueille | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130218160 | Bjorn et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226189 | Young | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261762 | Kennedy | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140012391 | Gugler et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058526 | Meridew et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128986 | Podolsky | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135773 | Stein et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135791 | Nikou et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207123 | Mueller | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257293 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275940 | Hladio et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303743 | Choudhury et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330281 | Aghazadeh | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140363481 | Pasini et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370462 | Porter et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371897 | Lin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150005777 | Ferro et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182350 | Behzadi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150182351 | Behzadi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150196343 | Donald et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150201918 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216668 | Smith | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150282856 | Haiat et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029952 | Hunter | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160058519 | Herr | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160166390 | Dye et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206430 | Grostefon et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206433 | Grostefon et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160220315 | Falardeau et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338751 | Kellar et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170056205 | Biegun et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095313 | van der Weide et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196506 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196701 | Behzadi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196704 | Behzadi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196705 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196706 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196707 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196708 | Behzadi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196710 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196711 | Behzadi | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170290666 | Behzadi | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170290667 | Behzadi | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170325972 | Steif | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340448 | Behzadi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340456 | Behzadi | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170354505 | Behzadi | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180049891 | Termanini | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180116740 | Gogarty et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180235764 | Moore et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180235765 | Welker et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180296364 | Harris et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180325695 | Wozencroft | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190336307 | Sungu et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200069279 | Behzadi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200069280 | Behzadi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205988 | Behzadi et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200261232 | Mistry | Aug 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297499 | Behzadi et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20220249236 | Matyas et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1433445 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 2004045465 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2007096476 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2017029173 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| 2018031752 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report for International application No. PCT/US2017/012753, dated May 5, 2017. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2017/012753 dated May 5, 2017. |
| International Search Report for International application No. PCT/US2017/046261, dated Oct. 18, 2017. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2017/046261, dated Oct. 18, 2017. |
| PCT International Search Report for International application No. PCT/US17/26417, dated Jul. 3, 2017. |
| PCT Written Opinion of The International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US17/26417 dated Jul. 3, 2017. |
| International Search Report regarding International application No. PCT/US2017/037042 dated Oct. 6, 2017. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority regarding International application No. PCT/US2017/037042 dated Oct. 6, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/446,985, filed Sep. 6, 2021, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,268, filed Jun. 16, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/821,159, filed Aug. 19, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/823,955, filed Aug. 31, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 18/236,335, filed Aug. 21, 2023, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/277,294, filed Jan. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/353,024, filed Jun. 21, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/355,657, filed Jun. 28, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/373,515, filed Aug. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/651,077, filed Mar. 31, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/742,851, filed Oct. 8, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/743,042, filed Oct. 9, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/202,434, filed Jul. 5, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/234,782, filed Aug. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/234,880, filed Aug. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/235,032, filed Aug. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/235,053, filed Aug. 11, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/284,091, filed Oct. 3, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/362,675, filed Nov. 28, 2016, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/396,785, filed Jan. 2, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/398,996, filed Jan. 5, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,219, filed Mar. 8, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/592,229, filed May 11, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/687,324, filed Aug. 25, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/716,529, filed Sep. 27, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/716,533, filed Sep. 27, 2017, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/030,603, filed Jul. 9, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/030,824, filed Jul. 9, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/154,033, filed Oct. 8, 2018, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/276,639, filed Feb. 15, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,085, filed Feb. 16, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/278,668, filed Feb. 18, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,750, filed Apr. 4, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/375,736, filed Apr. 4, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/571,180, filed Sep. 15, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,960, filed Sep. 28, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/589,099, filed Sep. 30, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/595,341, filed Oct. 7, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/596,410, filed Oct. 8, 2019, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/819,092, filed Mar. 14, 2020, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/842,415, filed Apr. 7, 2020, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/945,908, filed Aug. 2, 2020, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/010,769, filed Sep. 2, 2020, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/164,780, filed Feb. 1, 2021, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/238,148, filed Apr. 22, 2021, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/446,985, filed Sep. 7, 2021, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/457,761, filed Dec. 6, 2021, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/586,359, filed Jan. 27, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/587,389, filed Jan. 28, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/587,835, filed Jan. 28, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/588,793, filed Jan. 31, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,232, filed Jun. 16, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,328, filed Jun. 16, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/814,807, filed Jul. 25, 2022, Kambiz Behzadi et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220117620 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62277294 | Jan 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16589099 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Child | 17449245 | US | |
| Parent | 15398996 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Child | 16276639 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16276639 | Feb 2019 | US |
| Child | 16589099 | US | |
| Parent | 15202434 | Jul 2016 | US |
| Child | 15398996 | US |
