1. Field of the Invention
The invention is concerned with local bone regeneration for long bones. More specifically, the invention relates to the use of locally-applied vacuum to stimulate osteoblastic activity in long bones with discontinuity defects.
2. Description of the Related Art
Osteogenesis, the growth of new bone, is a part of the normal healing process, and involves recruiting and activating osteoblast cells in the bone. This can be a slow process, particularly in the elderly and after severe trauma to the bone and after disease. The ability to accelerate osteogenesis would speed the healing process after trauma and after orthopedic and dental procedures. Methods to accelerate the process, particularly in local areas of bone, have been a holy grail for scientists for many years.
Current techniques of bone regeneration include: traditional methods such as distraction osteogenesis in which bone is pulled in an appropriate direction to stimulate growth, and bone grafting; and, experimental techniques that include use of drugs such as OP-1 that stimulate osteoblasts, implanting biomaterials laced with molecular signals designed to trigger the body's own repair mechanism, injecting bone marrow stem cells into the affected areas, and, transfusing cells that carry genes that code for bone-repair proteins. None of these methods are totally satisfactory, for a host of reasons. For a review of this subject see: Service, Science, 289:1498 (2000).
Distraction osteogenesis requires a bulky device and requires a very long period before positive results are seen. Bone grafting is limited by the quantity and quality of the patient's bone available for grafting. Biocompatible polymeric matrices without or with natural or recombinant bone morphogenic proteins suffer from a need for a very large and very expensive quantities of these signal proteins. The gene therapy procedure suffers from the general problems of gene therapy in general. The use of the stem cell approach is greatly limited by the scarcity and expense of such cells; for example, in 50-year olds, there is only one stem cell in 400,000 bone marrow cells. (see Service, 2000, above.)
Applicant has previously described a device that applies subatmospheric pressures to a fractured or lesioned area of a flat bone (e.g., scapula), and thereby promotes osteogenesis and consequent bone healing in such areas (Lytinas, U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,693, which is incorporated herein by reference). However, for anatomical reasons such a device is not suitable for non-flat long bones of the upper and lower extremities, particularly where blunt trauma from accidents and/or projectiles produces in the long bone discontinuous defects leaving gaps of 2.5 cm and more. In the past such discontinuous defects have been treated orthopedically by grafting into the discontinuity pieces of the bone taken from elsewhere in the body. More often than not, such grafting does not completely fill the discontinuity, thereby leading to poor healing (fibrous) and shortened extremities.
Clearly, there is an acute need for a safe, simple, rapid, inexpensive and efficient device and method for producing osteogenesis in discontinuous regions of long bones. Such a device and method, based in principal on the vacuum technique discovered by the applicant (U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,693) has now been discovered, and is described below.
A device and method for producing bone regeneration (osteogenesis) in a discontinuous local section of a long bone in a subject requiring same, comprising the step of applying to the local section of the bone a vacuum (subatmospheric pressure) for an effective period of time.
In one embodiment, the discontinuous section of the long bone is sealed from the atmosphere with a flexible, sterilizable sleeve or cuff device of a dimension and curvature suitable to enclose and fit sealably tightly over the discontinuous or fractured section of the long bone, the device being connected through a sealable exit port to a source of vacuum, such that the discontinuous section of the long bone can be evacuated for an appropriate length of time.
The essence of the invention is the production of bone regeneration (osteoblastic cell-induced osteogenesis) in a desired section of a long bone by the application to this section a vacuum (within the context of this specification the term vacuum is to be considered synonymous with subatmospheric pressure) for an effective length of time.
The method can be applied to any long bone in humans or animals. It can be applied to a wide variety of medical conditions, e.g., a bone that has been shattered by such trauma that produces a discontinuous section that requires osteogenesis; a bone that requires lengthening; a bone that needs reshaping, as after an accident; a bone after surgical removal of a cancerous or cystic section of the bone; and, in bone resorption areas (alveolar region).
The device of the invention is suitable for a variety of long bones, including a femur, a clavicle, ribs, humerus, ulna and radius, carpal and metacarpal bones and their phalanges, tibia, fibula, and, tarsal and metatarsal bones and their phalanges, among others.
At the heart of the invention is a device that produces the vacuum on the discontinuous or fractured section of the long bone. A highly preferred device is an evacuatable sleeve or cuff (the two terms are used interchangeably) that can be fitted around the discontinuous section or fracture of the bone and that can be maintained under vacuum through a port. The evacuation port is continuous with both the interior of the sleeve or cuff and the skin surrounding the bone being treated so that repeated re-evacuations may be easily applied by medical personnel.
In
The sleeve or cuff should be composed of flexible, sterilizable (e.g., autoclavable) material. It may be made of a light biocompatible metal or plastic, and its walls should be sufficiently thick so as not to collapse under vacuum. Snugness of the sleeve or cuff device is accomplished, in part, by fabricating the device so that the curvature of the portion resting against the bone is designed to fit the particular bone being treated, and, in part, by the flexibility of the sleeve or cuff. Sleeves or cuffs with a wide variety of sizes and shapes may be fabricated by well-known methods and kept on hand under sterile conditions.
The sleeve or cuff of the inventive device is hermetically glued to the bone above and below the discontinuity section with any appropriate surgical glue, e.g., an elastic silicone Nexaband Liquid, VPL, Inc. without or with glues of the type of KRAZY GLUE. It is important that the sleeve or cuff have elastic properties so that the vacuum seal will not be broken if the bone moves in place.
The sleeve or cuff, once attached to the bone, is evacuated by a vacuum pump (e.g. Nalgene vacuum pump, although any other vacuum pump is suitable) by means of the port (4 and 5 in
The device is maintained in place for an appropriate length of time before being removed. Determination of this appropriate length of time is based on the clinical condition being treated and the degree of regeneration required. This determination does not require undue experimentation by the medical or dental surgeon applying the technique.
The progress of bone regeneration may be followed radiographically, as a plastic version of the inventive device is radiolucent and the new bone is not. The osteoid precursor stage of bone regeneration may not, however, always be visible by X-ray. At an appropriate time, the inventive device may be removed surgically, preferably by cutting it away from the bone by, for example, a dental burr.
The following example merely provides an embodiment of the inventive method, and should not be construed as limiting the claims in any way.
Under sterile conditions, the bone to be treated is reached surgically. Skin, fat, muscles, etc. are blunt-resected from the bone.
The autoclaved sleeve or cuff device is slipped around the desired discontinuity section of the bone, and sealed to the bone with surgical glue (e.g. Nexaband liquid, Veterinary Products Laboratories, Inc.).
The vacuum port of the device is attached to a vacuum pump, and the device evacuated to the desired pressure, e.g. about 30 in. Hg. At this point the vacuum port is sealed so as to maintain the vacuum. The subcutaneous tissues are closed with sutures, e.g., a 4-0 Dexonsuture, and the skin sutured closed.
The degree of vacuum can be monitored by a vacuum gauge attached to the vacuum port.
At an appropriate length of time, e.g., about four weeks, the device (still well-sealed) is removed from the long bone. A bone augmentation at the site of the treatment will be noted.
This is a continuing application of copending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/410,610, filed Apr. 10, 2003, the prior application is herewith incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
| 2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
| 2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
| 2910763 | Lauterbach | Nov 1959 | A |
| 2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
| 3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
| 4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4233969 | Lock et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
| 4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4525166 | Leclerc | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4551139 | Plaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
| 4710165 | McNeil et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
| 4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4822278 | Oliva et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4919654 | Kalt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5019086 | Neward | May 1991 | A |
| 5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224947 | Cooper et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5342376 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5437622 | Carion | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5807230 | Argenta et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810840 | Lindsay | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5935136 | Hulse et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5964733 | Laabs et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086587 | Hawk | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6359189 | Fleischmann | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6398767 | Fleischmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6491693 | Lytinas | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6555729 | Fleischmann | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6557487 | Fleischmann | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6673028 | Argenta et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6712851 | Lemperle et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6770794 | Fleischmann | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6863022 | Fleischmann | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7169151 | Lytinas | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 20010029956 | Argenta et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115952 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030225347 | Argenta et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039391 | Argenta et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122434 | Argenta et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050028828 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043659 | Challis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283105 | Heaton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20080275409 | Kane et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 550575 | Aug 1982 | AU |
| 745271 | Apr 1999 | AU |
| 755496 | Feb 2002 | AU |
| 2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
| 26 40 413 | Mar 1978 | DE |
| 43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
| 295 04 378 | Oct 1995 | DE |
| 0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
| 0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
| 0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 1018967 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
| 2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
| 2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
| 2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
| 2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
| 2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
| 2 329 127 | Aug 2000 | GB |
| 4129536 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 71559 | Apr 2002 | SG |
| WO 8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
| WO 8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
| WO 9010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
| WO 9309727 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO 9420041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070123895 A1 | May 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10410610 | Apr 2003 | US |
| Child | 11643390 | US |