Spinal deformities, which include rotation, angulation, and/or curvature of the spine, can result from various disorders, including, for example, scoliosis (abnormal curvature in the coronal plane of the spine), kyphosis (backward curvature of the spine), and spondylolisthesis (forward displacement of a lumbar vertebra). Other causes of an abnormally shaped spine include trauma and spinal degeneration with advancing age. Early techniques for correcting such deformities utilized external devices that applied force to the spine in an attempt to reposition the vertebrae. These devices, however, resulted in severe restriction and in some cases immobility of the patient. Furthermore, current external braces have limited ability to correct the deformed spine and typically only prevent progression of the deformity. Thus, to avoid this need, doctors developed several internal fixation techniques to span across multiple vertebrae and force the spine into a desired orientation. Additional fixation is beneficial in cases in which the bone quality is poor, such as patients with osteoporotic bone. The poor bone quality reduces the strength of the bone to implant interface.
To fix the spine, surgeons attach one or more fixation elements (typically rods or plates) to the spine at several fixation sites to correct and stabilize the spinal deformity, prevent reoccurrence of the spinal deformity, and stabilize weakness in trunks that results from degenerative discs and joint disease, deficient posterior elements, spinal fracture, and other debilitating problems. Bone screws are typically used to anchor the spinal rods or plates at the various fixation sites. Once anchored, the rod-based systems are under stress and subjected to significant forces, known as cantilever pullout forces. As a result, surgeons are always concerned about the possibility of the implant loosening or the bone screws pulling out of the bone. Thus, surgeons generally seek to attach implants in the most secure and stable fashion possible while at the same time addressing a patient's specific anatomy. In some instances, motion of the spine causes stress at the interface between the bone screws and the bone, resulting in loosening of the bone screws.
Accordingly, there is a need in this art for improved methods and devices for bone screw fixation.
The present invention generally provides methods and device for fixing a bone screw to bone. In one embodiment, a bone fixation device is provided and includes a receiving head having a recess adapted to seat a spinal rod therein and a shank extending distally from the receiving head. An anti-rotation mechanism can be located distal of a distal end of the receiving head and around a proximal portion of the shank, and it can be configured to interact with bone to prevent rotation of at least a portion of the bone screw relative to the bone.
The anti-rotation mechanism can have a variety of configurations. In one exemplary embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of one or more spikes extending distally from the distal end of the receiving head and adapted to engage bone. In another embodiment, the receiving head can have a substantially rectangular shape such that the rectangular shape forms an anti-rotation mechanism that is adapted to engage bone. In another exemplary embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a washer adapted to deform between the head and bone when the bone screw is inserted into bone. The washer can include fixation features to engage bone. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a generally hemi-spherical member disposed around the shank. The hemi-spherical member can have surface features for engaging bone and/or a coating disposed thereon for promoting bone ingrowth into the hemi-spherical member. In another exemplary embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of one or more extensions coupled to the proximal portion of the shank and adapted to protrude from the shank when a deployment member is disposed within a lumen formed in the shank. In another exemplary embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a threaded member that is disposed around the shank and that includes threads that extend in a direction opposite to a direction of the threads disposed around the shank.
Methods for bone screw fixation are also provided and in one embodiment the method can include inserting a bone screw into bone to cause an anti-rotation mechanism located distal of a distal end of a receiving head of the bone screw and around a proximal portion of a shank of the bone screw to engage bone surrounding the bone screw. The method can further include positioning a spinal connector within the receiving head, and applying a locking mechanism to lock the rod within the receiving head. In one embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of at least one spike movably coupled to the head, and applying the locking mechanism can cause the at least one spike to extend from the receiving head and into bone. In another embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of at least one spike movably disposed within the shank of the bone screw, and advancing a deployment mechanism through the shank of the bone screw can cause the at least one spike to extend from the bone screw and into bone. In yet another embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a deformable washer that is disposed around the shank, and inserting the bone screw into bone can cause the deformable washer to deform between the receiving head and the bone. In other aspects, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a hemi-spherical member that is disposed around the shank and that is effective to engage bone disposed around the shank. The hemi-spherical member can include a plurality of surface features formed thereon that extend into and engage bone disposed around the shank, and/or it can include a coating formed thereon that promotes bone ingrowth into the hemi-spherical member. In yet another embodiment, the anti-rotation mechanism can be in the form of a threaded member, and inserting the bone screw into bone can include rotating the threaded member in a first direction to insert the threaded member into bone, and inserting the shank of the bone screw through a lumen formed in the threaded member and rotating the shank of the bone screw in a second direction opposite to the first direction to insert the shank of the bone screw into bone.
In another embodiment, a method of fixing a bone screw to bone is provided and includes implanting a bone anchor into a vertebra. The bone anchor can have a receiving head configured for receiving a spinal rod and a shank extending from the receiving head. The receiving head can have a substantially rectangular shape such that opposed sidewalls of the receiving head engage a spinous and transverse process of a vertebra to prevent rotation of the receiving head relative to the vertebra.
The invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Certain exemplary embodiments will now be described to provide an overall understanding of the principles of the structure, function, manufacture, and use of the devices and methods disclosed herein. One or more examples of these embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in the art will understand that the devices and methods specifically described herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings are non-limiting exemplary embodiments and that the scope of the present invention is defined solely by the claims. The features illustrated or described in connection with one exemplary embodiment may be combined with the features of other embodiments. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.
The present invention generally provides methods and devices for spinal fixation. In one exemplary embodiment, the methods and devices provide an anti-rotation mechanism located on a bone anchor for preventing rotation of at least a portion of the bone anchor relative to bone. The methods and devices are particularly useful for unilateral fixation, in which one or more levels of the spine are stabilized along a single lateral side of the spine. An anti-rotation mechanism is particularly desirable with unilateral fixation, as the natural forces through the spine are centered down the middle of the spine and thus the anti-rotation mechanism helps to stabilize the bone anchor and provide a more secure fixation.
A person skilled in the art will appreciate that, while the methods and devices are particularly useful for unilateral fixation, the methods and devices can be used in various procedures in which it is desirable to provide a more secure connection between a bone anchor and bone. A person skilled in the art will also appreciate that the term unilateral or bilateral fixation is intended to include both rigid fixation in which movement between adjacent vertebrae is prevented, and dynamic fixation in which adjacent vertebrae are stabilized relative to one another but a limited amount of motion is allowed between the adjacent vertebrae. With rigid fixation, for example, one or more bone anchors can be coupled to one another by a rigid spinal connector, such as a spinal rod. With dynamic fixation, for example, one or more bone anchors can be coupled to one another by a dynamic spinal connector, such as a flexible spinal rod, a dynamic or flexible spinal plate, or other devices that will allow motion between the adjacent vertebrae. Commonly-owned U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0086130 filed on Oct. 6, 2006 and entitled “Torsionally Stable Fixation,” by Lake et al. (Atty. Docket No. 101896-495 (DEP5767)), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses various exemplary spinal connectors that can be used with the spinal anchors disclosed herein. The spinal connectors are particularly configured for use during fixation, and thus can further provide a more secure spinal fixation construct.
In another embodiment, as shown in
In use, the retaining member 27 with spikes 28 can be freely disposed within the head 22 such that the retaining member 27 and spikes 28 will move to the retracted position when the screw is being driven into bone. However, in an exemplary embodiment, the retaining member 27 is held in a retracted position during deployment of the screw. For example, the retaining member 27 can include a retaining feature adapted to hold the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 within the head 22. In the illustrated embodiment, the retaining member 27 can include one or more bores (not shown) formed on the curved walls of the retaining member 27. The head 22 can include one or more corresponding protrusions that are adapted to extend into and engage the bores. The protrusions can be positioned in a location that keeps the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 fully disposed within the head. For example, the protrusions can be located so that the distal end of the spikes 28 does not extend through the bores 23 formed in the head 22. In an exemplary embodiment, the protrusions are positioned just distal of the threads formed within the head 22. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that protrusions and/or bores can be located at any position within the head 22 and/or on the retaining member 27 to allow the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 to be held in the retracted position. In use, in order to move the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 into the second extended position, a rod R which gets seated in the head 22 can push the retaining member out of engagement with the protrusions, thus allowing the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 to move distally towards the second extended position in which the spikes 28 will engage bone.
In other embodiments, the retaining member can be inserted into the head 22 of the bone screw 20 after the bone screw 20 is driven into bone. For example, the retaining member 27 can include one or more features, such as bores 29, formed therein that are adapted to removably couple to the inserter tool, thus allowing the inserter tool to grasp and deliver the retaining member to the head 22. The inserter tool can also or alternatively be used to hold the retaining member in the retracted position while the screw 20 is driven into bone. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that any technique can be used to retain the retaining member 27 and the spikes 28 in the head 22 of the bone screw during insertion of the bone screw into bone, or alternatively the retaining member 27 can float within the head 22. In such an embodiment, the retaining member 27 and spikes 28 can simply move to the retracted position as the screw 20 is driven into bone.
While not shown, in other embodiments the spinal anchor can optionally include a compression element disposed within the head 22 of the bone screw 20. As the set screw 24 locks the rod R within the head 22, the rod R will abut against and push the compression element distally within the head 22 to force the spikes 28 to extend through the bores and protrude distally from the head 22. In another embodiment, at least a portion of the spikes 28 can be semi-flexible or flexible to allow the spikes 28 to deform as the spikes 28 are extended from the head 22 to provide additional holding strength. A person skilled in the art will appreciate any technique can be used to move and lock the spikes 28 into the second extended position. For example, a secondary instrument could deploy the spikes 28 or retract the spikes 28 for implant removal, preferably with the rod R in it's final placement.
In another embodiment, rather than having spikes formed on or disposed within the receiving head, a separate member can be removably disposed around the shank and it can be configured to mate with the receiver head. By way of non-limiting example,
In another exemplary embodiment, the shape of the head of the bone screw can be modified to form an anti-rotation mechanism. In particular, the head of the bone screw or other anchor can be modified to have a non-cylindrical or asymmetrical shape.
In use, the asymmetrical head, e.g., head 32 or 42, can be disposed within a recessed region of bone to engage the bone such that the head cannot rotate, or alternatively a recess or cavity can be formed in the bone to receive the head.
As indicated above, in another embodiment the bone can be milled or otherwise prepared to have a recess or cavity that is configured to seat a head of a bone screw or other bone anchor.
The washer 88 can also include features, such as serrations, surface features, mating notches, teeth, etc., to provide friction between the distal end 82b of the receiver head 82 and the proximal end 88a of the washer 88. By way of non-limiting example,
In use, the washer 88 is adapted to deform and engage bone as the shank 8 is threaded into bone. In particular, as the head 82 is advanced toward a bone surface during insertion of the shank 314 into bone, the washer 88 will be compressed between the head 82 and the bone. The washer 88 will thus deform, as shown in
In use, the shank 96b of the second portion 96 is threaded into bone by rotating the second portion 96 in a first direction. The head 96a of the second portion 96 can optionally include an internal drive mechanism formed therein for receiving a driver to drive the second portion 96 into bone. When the shank 96b is fully implanted the head 96a will rest against the bone surface. The shank 94b of the first portion 94 is then passed through the shank 96b of the second portion 96 and is threaded into bone by rotating the first portion 94 in an opposite direction. As noted above with respect to the second portion 96, the head 94a of the first portion 96 can likewise optionally include an internal drive mechanism formed therein for receiving a driver to drive the first portion 94 into bone. When the shank 94b is fully implanted, the head 94a of the first portion 94 will reside within the head 96a of the second portion 96, as shown in
The deployment member 110 can have a variety of configurations, but in the illustrated embodiment the deployment member 110 is in the form of an elongate cylindrical member having a distal portion with a diameter that is greater than an inner diameter of the distal portion of the body 109, thus allowing the deployment member 110 to extend the extensions outward from the shank 104 when the deployment member 110 is inserted or advanced into the body 109. Additionally the extensions may be integral to the deployment member and they can be made of a deformable material to extend thru the lumens of the shank 104. The deployment member 110 can have a variety of features to prevent the deployment member 110 from being forced proximally out of the body 109 and allowing the extensions to move from the second position into the first position. For example, the deployment member 110 may have a geometry, locking shoulder recess, or threads to prevent the extensions from forcing the deployment members 110 upward after insertion. In the illustrated embodiment, the deployment member 110 includes threads 112 formed on at least a proximal portion thereof. The inner lumen of the shank 104 includes corresponding threads 114. As the deployment member 110 is advanced into the inner lumen of the shank towards the body 109, the threads 112 are adapted to mate with the threads 114 of the shank 104 to prevent the deployment member 110 from being forced proximally by the extensions 108 when the extensions 108 are in the second deployed position. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the deployment member 110 can include any features or have any configuration that prevents the deployment member 110 from being forced in the proximal direction when the extensions 108 are in the second position. A variety of techniques can also be used to advance the deployment member 110 into the shank 104 and the body 109. In the illustrated embodiment, a tool can be used to rotate the deployment member 110 into the shank 104 to allow the threads 112 to mate with the threads 114 of the shank 104. For example, a driver having a head with a shape corresponding to the recess 116 formed on the proximal end of the deployment member 110 can be used to removably couple to the deployment member 110 to advance the deployment member 110 into the shank 104 and the body 109. If required, the implant deployment member 110 could be removed, which would retract the extensions allowing the implant to be removed.
The extensions may be integral to the shaft and manufactured from wiring out a spring tab profile. The deployment member 110 would still act to push the extension geometry radially outward.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate further features and advantages of the invention based on the above-described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated by the appended claims. All publications and references cited herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/828,428 filed on Oct. 6, 2006 and entitled “Improved Bone Screw Fixation,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
867429 | Simmerman | Oct 1907 | A |
1091674 | Lee | Mar 1914 | A |
1784026 | Olson | Dec 1930 | A |
1845428 | Llewellyn | Feb 1932 | A |
2077804 | Morrison | Apr 1937 | A |
2685877 | Dobelle | Aug 1954 | A |
3016077 | Yocum | Jan 1962 | A |
3953140 | Carlstrom | Apr 1976 | A |
4579491 | Kull | Apr 1986 | A |
4636121 | Miller | Jan 1987 | A |
4716893 | Fischer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4760843 | Fischer et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4790304 | Rosenberg | Dec 1988 | A |
4871289 | Choiniere | Oct 1989 | A |
4943292 | Foux | Jul 1990 | A |
5053036 | Perren et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057111 | Park | Oct 1991 | A |
5127914 | Calderale et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5151103 | Tepic et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176682 | Chow | Jan 1993 | A |
5209753 | Biedermann et al. | May 1993 | A |
5269784 | Mast | Dec 1993 | A |
5364399 | Lowery et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5472452 | Trott | Dec 1995 | A |
5474553 | Baumgart et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478342 | Kohrs | Dec 1995 | A |
5489210 | Hanosh | Feb 1996 | A |
5501684 | Schlapfer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520690 | Errico et al. | May 1996 | A |
5534027 | Hodorek | Jul 1996 | A |
5578034 | Estes | Nov 1996 | A |
5578035 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5601558 | Torrie et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607426 | Ralph et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607428 | Lin | Mar 1997 | A |
5611688 | Hanosh | Mar 1997 | A |
5643265 | Errico et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5643321 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5702391 | Lin | Dec 1997 | A |
5735853 | Olerud | Apr 1998 | A |
5741258 | Klaue et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5759184 | Santangelo | Jun 1998 | A |
5769852 | Brånemark | Jun 1998 | A |
5797912 | Runciman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810823 | Klaue et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5843082 | Yuan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
5876402 | Errico et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902303 | Eckhof et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904683 | Pohndorf et al. | May 1999 | A |
5931621 | Griffith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5931838 | Vito | Aug 1999 | A |
5954722 | Bono | Sep 1999 | A |
5976139 | Bramlet | Nov 1999 | A |
6017345 | Richelsoph | Jan 2000 | A |
6030389 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036693 | Yuan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039740 | Olerud | Mar 2000 | A |
6077264 | Chemello | Jun 2000 | A |
6168597 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183474 | Bramlet et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206882 | Cohen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235033 | Brace et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241731 | Fiz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261291 | Talaber et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273889 | Richelsoph | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6322562 | Wolter et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331179 | Freid et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6402756 | Ralph et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423067 | Eisermann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428542 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443954 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447513 | Griggs | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447546 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454769 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6575975 | Brace et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6595993 | Donno et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599290 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602255 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6648889 | Bramlet et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660008 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668688 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679883 | Hawkes et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695846 | Richelsoph et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6890334 | Brace et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6932834 | Lizardi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945975 | Dalton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964664 | Freid et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979334 | Dalton | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6989013 | Pisharodi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001389 | Navarro et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7052499 | Steger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7118572 | Bramlet et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7381213 | Lizardi | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7879036 | Biedermann et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905908 | Cragg et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20010021851 | Eberlein et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020058939 | Wagner et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030078583 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030187440 | Richelsoph et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199876 | Brace et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208204 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225409 | Freid et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019353 | Freid et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040087951 | Khalili | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097935 | Richelsoph et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106925 | Culbert | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127896 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127897 | Freid et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127899 | Konieczynski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127900 | Konieczynski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127904 | Konieczynski et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172022 | Landry et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181227 | Khalili | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193157 | Falahee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193162 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040254579 | Buhren et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004574 | Muckter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010218 | Dalton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010219 | Dalton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027296 | Thramann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033298 | Hawkes et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049593 | Duong et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059971 | Michelson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050143737 | Pafford et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149027 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154392 | Medoff et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192577 | Mosca et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228386 | Ziolo et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228387 | Paul | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267474 | Dalton | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273105 | Konieczynski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277937 | Leung et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283152 | Lindemann et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009770 | Speirs et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015104 | Dalton | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025768 | Iott et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060100626 | Rathbun et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116678 | Impellizzeri | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122602 | Konieczynski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122604 | Gorhan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149249 | Mathoulin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149256 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149258 | Sousa | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161157 | Mosca et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070038219 | Matthis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073295 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070198018 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080086130 | Lake et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080183220 | Glazer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080255618 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090099601 | Aferzon et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090192553 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1348390 | Oct 2003 | EP |
9416634 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 0067653 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Suk, et al., “Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spinal Fusion”, SPINE, vol. 25, No. 14, pp. 1843-1847, 2000. |
Chen, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of Unilateral Fixation With Interbody Cages”, SPINE, vol. 30, No. 4, pp. E92-E96, 2005. |
Harris, et al., “Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion”, SPINE, vol. 29, No. 4, pp. E65-E70, 2004. |
Foley, et al., “Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine”, Neurosurg Focus 10 (4), Article 10, pp. 108, 2001. |
Grubb, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Cervical Spine Stabilization,” SPINE 1998, vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 886-892. |
Keller, et al., “The ComPact UniLock 2.0/2.4 system and its clinical application in small animal orthopedics”, Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, pp. 83-93, Feb. 2005. |
Law, et al., “Caudo-Cephalad Loading of Pedicle Screws: Mechanisms of Loosening and Methods of Augmentation,” SPINE 1993, vol. 18, No. 16, pp. 2438-2443. |
Lehmann, et al., “Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems”, Eur Spine J. 2005, vol. 14, pp. 243-249. |
Spivak, et al., “The Effect of Locking Fixation Screws on the Stability of Anterior Cervical Plating”, SPINE 1999, vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 334-338. |
Yang, et al., “Biomechanical comparision of the stable efficacy of two anterior plating systems”, Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 18(6), pp. 59-66, Jul. 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080086131 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60828428 | Oct 2006 | US |