Bone substitute for training and testing and method for making

Abstract

A bone substitute that drills and cuts like bone for use in training and testing comprising an inner core of a foamable polymer or other soft material and an outer shell of a polymer such as an epoxy resin with a particulate filler such as aluminum oxide or silicon carbide added thereto together with, in some cases, titanium oxide to form a slurry for casting or molding around the inner core. Also provided is a method for making the bone substitute.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates in general to substitutes for bone, and, in particular, to a bone substitute that has the look and feel, and cutting and drilling properties of human bone thereby making it especially useful as a bone model for teaching and training medical students and for testing surgical equipment.

Drilling bone to permit use of internal screws for fixation of fractures, to implant artificial joints, to fix intramedullary implants and to utilize various other procedures is a widespread and important surgical technique. Obviously, the above surgical procedures involve precise cuts and drilling of sensitive tissues.

Unfortunately, there is a shortage of human bone tissue on which to practice new techniques and procedures. Cadaver bone is difficult and often expensive to obtain and is a serious potential biohazard as well. Currently, surgeons practice new drilling techniques on blocks of plastic or polyurethane, assuming this material closely mimics the drilling behavior of live human bone which, however, is not the case.

Previous studies on the drilling of bone have focused on orthogonal cutting and machining, and wear of machine parts, but there is currently no easy way to comprehend data concerning distinguishing drilling behavior of materials for comparison. In any event, what is needed are new materials which when molded will drill and cut like bone in order to provide better training for medical students and more realistic testing for surgical equipment manufacturers.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a bone substitute whose properties closely mimic real bone when drilled or cut and comprises an inner core comprising a foamable polymer or other soft material to mimic cancellous bone and an outer shell formed around the inner core to mimic compact bone. The outer shell comprises a polymer such as an epoxy resin and a particulate filler such as a mineral added thereto to form a slurry for casting or molding around the inner core.

The particulate filler, which hardens the bone substitute and reduces the amount of polymer required, includes, but is not limited to, hydroxyapatite, aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ), silicon carbide (SiC) or mullite. For even better results, titanium oxide (Tio) can be added along with either Al 2 O 3 or SiC to modify the interaction between the polymer and the mineral and thereby reduce wear on surgical tools.

In one embodiment, the outer shell comprises an epoxy resin and from 5% to 15% by weight of Al 2 O 3 and from 20-45% by weight of TiO. In another embodiment, the outer shell comprises the epoxy resin and from 2.5% to 30% by weight of SiC and from 20% to 45% by weight of TiO.

To make a bone of the invention the first step is to make a female mold from an original (human) bone part. Then a bone substitute part is created from the female mold and reduced by a uniform thickness. A mold is created from the bone substitute part to replicate an inner core of the bone substitute; the inner core is then molded from a foamable polymer and suspended in the female mold. Finally, the outer shell is formed by pouring or injecting the epoxy resin/Al 2 O 3 (or SiC)/TiO slurry into the female mold with the inner core suspended therein.

The resulting bone substitute drills and cuts substantially like real bone thereby providing medical students with an accurate feel during surgical training, and equipment manufacturers with an accurate hardness for testing surgical devices.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a cross-section of the bone substitute of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a bar graph illustrating drilling data from dog, lamb and cow bones and various compositions of bone substitutes of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a chart showing load as a function of particle diameter for different substances added to an epoxy resin comprising the outer shell of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a bone substitute that has the look and feel, and cutting and drilling properties that closely mimic real bone. As shown in FIG. 1 , the invention comprises an inner core 10 made of a foamable polymer or other soft material and an outer shell 12 comprising a polymer and a particulate filler.

The filler is to increase the hardness, toughness and/or resistance of the polymer to drilling and cutting. The polymer and particulate filler form a slurry for casting around the inner core.

In laboratory tests of the invention, discussed below, two families of epoxy resins were chosen for the polymer for ease of processing: Bisphenol A and Bisphenol F. However, other thermosetting as well as thermoplastic polymers such as those listed in Table 1 below can also be used in the invention.

TABLE 1
ABS                              Polyalkalene Ether
ABS/PA                           Polyallomer
ABS/PC                           Polyamide (Nylon)
ABS/PVC                          Polybutadiene
Acetal                           Polybutylene
Acrylic                          Polycarbonate
Acrylonitrile Copolymer          Polyester (Saturated)
Alkyd                            Polyester (Unsaturated)
Allylic Esters or Allyls (DAP,DAIP) Polyether, chlorinated
ASA (Acrylic-styrene-acrylonitrile) Polyethylene
Bis-maleimides                   Polyimide (Polyamide-imide)
Cellulosics                      Polyphenylene Sulfide
Cyanate/Cyanamide                Polypropylene
Epoxy                            Polystyrene
Ethylene Vinyl Acetate           Polysulfone
Fluorocarbon Polymers :          Polyurethane
Fluorinated Ethylene-Propylene   Polyvinyl Acetate
(FEP)
Perfluoroalkoxy (PFA)            Polyvinyl Chloride
Polychlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) Polyvinylidene Chloride
Polytetrafluoroethylene (TFE)    Polyxylylene
Polyvinylfluoride (PVF)          Silicone
Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF)   Styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN)
Furan                            Styrene-maleic-anhydride (SMA)
Ionomer                          Urea-Formaldehyde
Melamine-Formaldehyde            Vinyl Ester
Phenolic

The particulate filler comprises a mineral, which, as noted above, hardens the bone substitute and reduces the amount of polymer required. Suitable minerals include, but are not limited to, hydroxyapatite, aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ), silicon carbide (SiC) and mullite.

In the laboratory tests, as discussed below, even better results were obtained by adding a second filler, titanium oxide (TiO), to either Al 2 O 3 or SiC to modify the interaction between the epoxy resin and the mineral and thereby reduce wear on surgical tools.

In one embodiment, the outer shell comprises an epoxy resin and from 5% to 15% by weight of Al 2 O 3 and from 20-45% by weight of TiO. In another embodiment, the outer shell comprises the epoxy resin and from 2.5% to 30% by weight of SiC and from 20% to 45% by weight of Tio. Best results were obtained with particle size for the Al 2 O 3 being 100 microns or less and for the SiC being 10 microns or less.

To fabricate a bone substitute of the invention the first step is to make a female mold from an original (human) bone part. Then a bone substitute part is created from the female mold and reduced by a uniform thickness. A mold is created from the bone substitute part to replicate an inner core of the bone substitute; the inner core is then molded from a foamable polymer and suspended in the female mold. Finally, the outer shell is formed by pouring or injecting, for example, the epoxy resin/Al 2 O 3 (or SiC)/TiO slurry into the female mold with the inner core suspended therein.

As shown in Table 2, different composite samples were formed in laboratory tests, consisting of three different epoxy resin systems, EPON® Resins 815, 826 and 862 (EPON is a registered trademark of Shell Chemical Company).

TABLE 2
Composition Table
Resin	Filler A	Filler B	Sample No.	Test Date (Drilling)
826/V-40	None	None	7	19-Nov-96
815/V-40	None	None	8	19-Nov-96
826/V-40	35% 325 Mullite	None	11
826/V-40	56.6% 325 Mullite	None	12
815/V-40	40% 325 Mullite	None	13
815/V-40	40% 325 Mullite	None	13	21-Nov-96
815/V-40	60.8% 325 Mullite	None	14
815/V-40	60.8% 325 Mullite	None	14	21-Nov-96
862/3274	51.7% 100 Mullite	None	15
862/3274	51.7% 100 Mullite	None	15	21-Nov-96
862/3274	64.6% 100 Mullite	None	16
862/3274	64.6% 100 Mullite	None	16	21-Nov-96
815/V-40	47% 100 Mullite	None	17
815/V-40	47% 100 Mullite	None	17	21-Nov-96
815/V-40	62% 100 Mullite	None	18
815/V-40	62% 100 Mullite	None	18	21-Nov-96
826/V-40	24% 100 Mullite	None	19
826/V-40	62% 100 Mullite	None	19	21-Nov-96
826/V-40	49% 100 Mullite	None	20
826/V-40	49% 100 Mullite	None	20	21-Nov-96
826/V-40	34.2% T64-60	None	21
826/V-40	34.2% T64-60	None	21	21-Nov-96
826/V-40	52% T64-60	None	22
826/V-40	52% T64-60	None	22	21-Nov-96
815/V-40	61% T64-60	None	23
815/V-40	61% T64-60	None	23	21-Nov-96
815/V-40	38.7% T64-60	None	24
815/V-40	38.7% T64-60	None	24	21-Nov-96
862/3274	71.7% T64-60	None	25
862/3274	71.7% T64-60	None	25	21-Nov-96
862/3274	52% T64-60	None	26	22-Nov-96
826/V-40	57% T64-200	None	27	22-Nov-96
826/V-40	42% T64-200	None	28	22-Nov-96
815/V-40	43.3% T64-200	None	29	22-Nov-96
862/3274	55% T64-200	None	30	22-Nov-96
862/3274	65% T64-200	None	31	22-Nov-96
862/3274	71% AC99-325 Ll	None	32	22-Nov-96
862/3274	60.6% AC99-325 Ll	None	33	22-Nov-96
815/V-40	50% AC99-325 Ll	None	34	22-Nov-96
815/V-40	61% AC99-325 Ll	None	35	22-Nov-96
826/V-40	24.7% AC99-325 Ll	None	36	22-Nov-96
826/V-40	48% AC99-325 Ll	None	37	22-Nov-96
862/3274	52.3% A10 ung (?)	None	38	22-Nov-96
862/3274	40.4% A10 ung (?)	None	39	22-Nov-96
815/V-40	30% A, 10 μm	None	40	3-Dec-96
815/V-40	15% A, 10 μm	None	41	3-Dec-96
826/V-40	39% A, 10 μm	None	42	3-Dec-96
826/V-40	10.75% A, 10 μm	None	43	3-Dec-96
826/V-40	29% Premalox	None	44	3-Dec-96
826/V-40	46% Premalox	None	45	3-Dec-96
815/V-40	50% Premalox	None	46	3-Dec-96
815/V-40	39.8% Premalox	None	47	3-Dec-96
862/3274	31.6% Premalox	None	48	3-Dec-96
862/3274	55.5% Premalox	None	49	3-Dec-96
862/3274	10.24% Q-Cel 2116	None	50	3-Dec-96
862/3274	5.43% Q-Cel 2116	None	51	3-Dec-96
862/3274	42.3% TiO 2	None	52	3-Dec-96
862/3274	56% TiO 2	None	53	3-Dec-96
862/3274	25.5% TiO 2	None	54	3-Dec-96
826/V-40	58.2% AC99-100	None	55	3-Dec-96
815/V-40	33.5% 3μ SiC	None	56	3-Dec-96
Sawbones	None	None	58	5-Dec-96
815/V-40	54% 3μ SiC	None	59	6-Dec-96
826/V-40	5.6% 3μ SiC	None	60	6-Dec-96
826/V-40	29% 3μ SiC	None	61	6-Dec-96
862/3274	32% 3μ SiC	None	62	6-Dec-96
862/3274	46.5% 3μ SiC	None	63	19-Nov-96
826/V-40	27.5% AC99-100	None	64	6-Dec-96
862/3274	59.85% AC99-100	None	65	6-Dec-96
862/3274	69.5% AC99-100	None	66	6-Dec-96
815/V-40	48% AC99-100	None	67	6-Dec-96
815/V-40	64% AC99-100	None	68	6-Dec-96
826/V-40	16.8% 20μ SiC	None	69	6-Dec-96
826/V-40	44.8% 20μ SIC	None	70	6-Dec-96
826/V-40	26.4% TiO 2	5.6% α Al 2 O 3 , 0.3μ	71	6-Dec-96
815/V-40	56% 20μ SiC	None	72	6-Dec-96
815/V-40	33% 20μ SiC	None	73	6-Dec-96
862/3274	55.6% 20μ SiC	None	75	6-Dec-96
862/3274	67.3% 20μ SiC	None	76	6-Dec-96
862/3274	53.3% 100μ SiC	None	77	6-Dec-96
862/3274	Neat Resin	None	78	9-Dec-96
862/3274	48.68% TiO 2	7.5% α Al 2 O 3	79	9-Dec-96
862/3274	45.71% TiO 2	None	80	10-Dec-96
862/3274	48.63% TiO 2	8.17% 3μ SiC	81	11-Dec-96
862/3274	45.24% TiO 2	14.57% 3μ SiC	82	11-Dec-96
862/3274	48.63% TiO 2	8.17% 3μ SiC	83	12-Dec-96
862/3274	25.23% 3μ SiC	23.51% TiO 2	84	13-Dec-96
862/3274	31.2% TiO 2	9.92% Premalox	85	13-Dec-96
862/3274	41.54% TiO 2	5.73% 3μ SiC	86	16-Dec-96
862/3274	42.44% TiO 2	3.82% 3μ SiC	87	16-Dec-96
862/3274	30.72% TiO 2	9.18% Premalox	88	16-Dec-96

Except in two cases, each sample was filled with a variety of particulate minerals and titanium oxide (together fillers) of different diameters, and different volume concentrations as shown in Table 3. Samples made were 1″×6″×⅛″ in size, and were allowed to cure for a minimum of two days before any experiments were performed.

TABLE 3
Filler	Diameter	%	Resin	Curing Agent	Treatment
A-10 Ung	100 μm	15.03	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
Alumina Oxide		29.9
		10.75	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp.
		38.98
		40.39	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274
		52.33
Premalox 10 SG	0.25 μm	28.64	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
Alumina Oxide		45.87
		39.83	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		50.65
		31.58	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 2 hrs
		55.54
Mullite	˜149 μm	24.02	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 1 hr
100 Mesh		48.97
		46.98	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		62.4
		51.66	862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		64.62
Mullite	˜44 μm	34.91	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, cure Rm. Temp. overnight
325 Mesh		56.62
		39.69	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		60.8
		41.96	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure rm. Temp. overnight
		62.93
Aluchem AC99-100	˜149 μm	27.5	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 2 hrs
Tabular Alumina		58.28
		48.19	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		64.1
		59.85	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp overnight
		69.46
AC99-325 Ll	˜44 μm	24.71	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp overnight
Tab. Alumina Ground		47.99
Low Iron		50.18	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure 15° F. 3 um
		61.58
		60.61	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		71.15
T64-60	100 μm	34.24	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 2.5 hrs.
Tabular Alumina		52.05
		38.68	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry Cure rm. Temp overnight
		61.19
		52.05	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 3 hrs
		71.77
Silicon Carbide	3 μm	5.64	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		29.05
		31.9	EPON 862	EPI-CURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 2 hrs
		46.51
		33.52	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		54.1
Silicon Carbide	100 μm	44.06	EPON 882	EPI-CURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 3 hrs
		62.35
		38.24	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, cure 150° F. 2 hrs.
		53.33
	20 μm	32.74	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure 150° F. 3.5 hrs.
		56.29
		16.79	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		44.8
		55.6	EPON 862	EPI-CURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		67.31
Titanium (IV) Oxide		25.55	EPON 862	EPI-CURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure rm. Temp. overnight
		43.54
		42.3			Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		56.2
Same		47.57	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
(Dried 150° F. 2 hrs)		65.71
		25.77	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		61.29
		56.8	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		71.17
Q-Cell 2116		5.43	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp overnight
		10.24
T64-200	20 μm	55.12	EPON 862	EPICURE 3274	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
Tabular Alumina		64.88
		43.32	EPON 815	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
		67.85
T64-200		41.89	EPON 826	EPON V-40	Blow Dry, Cure Rm. Temp. overnight
Tabular Alumina		57

Bone specimens tested for comparison were bovine, lamb and dog, the bovine and lamb obtained from a local store, kept cold, and used within one week. The length of time the canine bone had been frozen was unknown. Bovine bone tissue has previously been shown to be similar to human bone tissue with respect to many physical and structural properties. Also tested was a bone substitute product manufactured by Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., called Sawbones®.

A standard surgical drill, the Maxidriver, was obtained and used for all drilling tests. A standard ⅛″ twist drill bit was used, a new bit for each sample. The drill was driven by nitrogen gas and all tests were performed at 110 psi, which results in a speed of approximately 900 rpm. The drill was clamped to the bottom of an INSTRON tensile machine, and samples were attached to a load cell and lowered onto the rotating drill.

Data was recorded for a given feed rate (usually two in/min) and fed to a personal computer. Information retrieved was load versus percent extension. A minimum of six holes were drilled in each sample with the same drill bit. A new drill bit was used for each bone or composite sample.

FIG. 2 provides comparative results between the dog, lamb and cow samples, the Sawbones® sample and ten samples of the invention (the sample numbers refer to the numbers in Table 2). FIG. 3 with its accompanying legend illustrates in chart form the performance of each sample from Table 2 as a function of filler particle diameter. The area where real bone falls is indicated by the hash marked area between approximately 7.5 and 12.5 on the load or y-axis. The legend can be used in conjunction with Table 4 to determine the performance of each sample.

	TABLE 4
	862/3274	%	826/V-40	%	815/V-40	%	826/3234	%
TiO 2	A1	42.3	B1	45.5			C1	54.71
	A2	56
	A3	25.5
Premalox	F1	31.6	D1	29	E1	50
	F2	55.5	D2	46	E2	39.8
SiC-3 um	I1	32	H1	29	G1	33.5
	I2	46.5	H2	32	G2	54
SiC-20 um	P1	55.6	N1	16.8	O1	56
	P2	67.3	N2	44.8	O2	33
T64-200	M1	55	K1	57	L1	43.3
	M2	65	K2	42
Mullite-325	Q1	63	R1	35	S1	40
	Q2	42	R2	56.5	S2	60.8
AC99-325 Ll	T1	71	V1	24.7	U1	50
	T2	60.6	V2	48	U2	61
Mullite-100	W1	51.7	Y1	24	X1	47
	W2	64.6	Y2	49	X2	62
T64-60	BB1	71.7	Z1	34.2	AA1	61
	BB2	52	Z2	52	AA2	38.7
A10-Ung	CC1	52.3	EE1	39	DD1	30
	CC2	40.4	EE2	10.8	DD2	15
SIC-100 um					FF1	53.3
AC99-100	HH1	59.85	GG1	58.2	II1	48
	HH2	69.5	GG2	27.5	II2	64
Sand	KK1	66	LL1	61.3	JJ1	70
	KK2	47.5	LL2	25.8	JJ2	56.8

Finally, Table 5 excerpts the best performing combination of epoxy resin, mineral and, in some cases TiO, for forming the outer shell of the substitute bone of the invention.

TABLE 5
			Filler 2		Table 2
Resin	Filler 1		(weight		Sample
(resin/hardner)	(weight %)	(test data)	%)	(test data)	Nos.
Shell Epon 815/V40	35%-60%	39%-50% 0.25 um Al 2 O 3	none		46, 47
100/44 pbw	30%-35%	33.5% 3.0 um SiC	none		56
	60%-65%	61% 100 um T64-60 tabular Al 2 O 3	none		23
	25%-35%	30% 10 um A-10 Al 2 O 3	none		40
Shell Epon 826/V40	35%-60%	35%-56.6% 44 um mullite	none		11, 12
100/100 pbw	20%-35%	24% 100 um mullite	none		19
	20%-55%	24.7%-48% 44 um AC99-325	none		36, 37
		ground tabular Al 2 O 3
	25%-35%	29% 0.25 um Al 2 O 3	none		44
	10%-50%	16.8%-44.8% 20 um SiC	none		69, 70
Shell Epon 862/3274	35%-55%	40.4%-52.3% 10 um A-10 Al 2 O 3	none		38, 39
100/44 pbw	25%-40%	31.6% 0.25 um Al 2 O 3	none		48
	30%-50%	32%-46.5% 3 um SiC	none		62, 63
	5%-15%	9.2%-9.9% 0.25 um Al 2 O 3	45%-20%	31.2%-30.7% TiO 2	85, 88
	2.5%-30%	3.8%-25.2% 3 um SiC	45%-20%	42.4%-23.5% TiO 2	84, 86, 87

The resulting bone substitute of the invention drills and cuts substantially like real bone thereby providing medical students with an accurate feel during surgical training, and equipment manufacturers with an accurate hardness for testing surgical devices.

Claims

1. A bone substitute useful as a bone model for teaching and training students and for testing surgical equipment, the bone substitute comprising:an inner core comprising a foamable polymer; and an outer shell formed around the inner core, the outer shell comprising an epoxy resin and silicon carbide (SiC) added to the epoxy resin.

2. A bone substitute useful as a bone model for teaching and training students and for testing surgical equipment, the bone substitute comprising:an inner core comprising a foamable polymer; and an outer shell formed around the inner core, the outer shell comprising a polymer, and silicon carbide (SiC) and titanium oxide (TiO) added to the polymer to form a slurry for casting or molding around the inner core, said bone substitute exhibiting properties substantially like real bone useful for training and testing.

3. A bone substitute comprising:an inner core comprising a foamable polymer; and an outer shell formed around the inner core, the outer shell comprising an epoxy resin and from 2.5% to 30% by weight of silicon carbide (SiC) and from 20% to 45% by weight of titanium oxide (TiO) added to the epoxy resin to form a slurry for casting or molding around the inner core, said bone substitute exhibiting properties substantially like real bone useful for training and testing.