Booster

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6622630
  • Patent Number
    6,622,630
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 11, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A booster to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to another booster includes an explosive and a shell. The shell has an open end to receive an end of the detonating cord and an indented closed end that is adapted to form a projectile to strike the other booster when the explosive detonates. The explosive may include at least fifty percent by weight of NONA, and in some embodiments, the explosive may be primarily NONA.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention relates to a booster, such as a booster that is used to transfer a detonation train between two detonating cords, for example.




A perforating gun typically is used to form tunnels in a formation to enhance the production of oil and/or gas from the formation. The tunnels are formed by detonating shaped charges of the perforating gun. In this manner, the shaped charges typically detonate in response to a shockwave, or detonation train, that propagates along a detonating cord (often called a primer cord) that contacts the shaped charges. Quite often, several perforating guns may be used to perforate the formation(s) of a wellbore in one firing sequence. As a result, the detonation train may be relayed from one perforating gun to the next, a condition that implies the detonation train is relayed between the detonating cords of the different perforating guns. One way to accomplish this is to tie the ends of the detonating cords together. However, such an arrangement may be too susceptible to failure.




Secondary explosives may be used to more effectively transfer a detonation train between two detonating cords, as the secondary explosives amplify, or boost, the detonation train due to the nature of the transfer. For example, referring to

FIG. 1

, a pair of detonating boosters


10


(a donor booster


10




a


and a receptor booster


10




b


) use secondary explosives to transfer a detonation train from one detonating cord


12


to another detonating cord


14


. To accomplish this, the detonating booster


10


may include an explosive


20


that is located near a closed flat end


24


of a tubular shell


22


. An open end


21


of the shell


22


receives an end of the detonating cord


12


,


14


that ideally contacts the explosive


20


. The explosive


20


in the donor booster


10




a


detonates in response to a detonation train from the detonating cord


12


, an event that causes the end


24


of the shell


22


to break into several projectiles. If the receptor booster


10




b


is close enough to the donor booster


10




a


, the projectiles strike the end of the receptor booster


10




b


and detonate its explosive


20


. The detonation of the explosive


20


of the receptor booster


10




b


, in turn, introduces a detonation train to the detonating cord


14


to complete the transfer of the detonation train. As depicted in

FIG. 1

, the donor


10




a


and receptor


10




b


boosters may be identical. Due to this feature, either booster


10


may be used as the donor booster, thereby making it difficult to make errors when assembling the donor and the receptor boosters


10


. Not shown in

FIG. 1

is a housing that typically is used to hold and position the donor


10




a


and receptor


10




b


boosters.




Due to the tolerances of other parts of the perforating gun (e.g., tolerances introduced by loading tube for shaped charges, connections, booster housing, etc.), it is difficult to have a fixed booster-to-booster air gap


40


between the ends


24


of the donor


10




a


and receptor


10




b


boosters. Because the projectiles from the donor booster


10




a


tend to spread apart during flight, the success of the detonation train transfer may be sensitive to the span of the air gap


40


. Therefore, if the air gap


40


is too large, the projectiles may spread too far apart and not sufficiently contact the receptor booster


10




b


to cause detonation of its explosive


20


.




Referring to


2


, the success of the detonation train transfer may also be sensitive to a cord-to-booster air gap


43


that may exist between the end of the detonating cord


12


,


14


and the explosive


20


. This gap


43


may be attributable to, as examples, an uneven cut in the detonating cord


12


,


14


or assembly error. Unfortunately, if the span of the air gap


43


is too large, the detonation train transfer may fail. For example, for the donor booster


10




a


, if the span is too large, a detonation train from the detonating cord


12


may not detonate the explosive


20


, and for the receptor booster


10




b


, if the span is too large, the detonation of the explosive


20


may not initiate a detonation train on the detonating cord


14


.




Thus, there is a continuing need for an arrangement that addresses one or more of the above-stated problems.




SUMMARY




In one embodiment of the invention, a booster to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to another booster includes an explosive and a shell. The shell has an open end to receive an end of the detonating cord and an indented closed end that is adapted to form a projectile to strike said another booster when the explosive detonates.




In another embodiment of the invention, a booster to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to another booster includes a shell and an explosive. The shell is adapted to receive an end of the detonating cord, and the explosive is adapted to detonate in response to the detonation train. The explosive includes at least approximately fifty percent of NONA by weight, and the explosive forms at least one projectile out of the shell to strike the other booster when the explosive detonates.




Other features will become apparent from the following description, from the drawings and from the claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional view of a donor detonating booster and a receptor detonating booster of the prior art.





FIG. 2

is an illustration of an air gap between a detonating cord and an explosive of a booster of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of a detonating booster according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 4

is an illustration of a projectile formed by the detonating booster of

FIG. 3

according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 5

is an illustration of projectiles formed by a detonating booster of the prior art.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of a detonating booster of the prior art.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIGS. 3 and 4

, an embodiment


50


of an explosive detonating booster in accordance with the invention may include features that permit greater cord-to-booster and booster-to-booster air gaps than conventional boosters. These features may include a shell


52


(of the booster


50


) that is constructed to permit a greater booster-to-booster air gap and may include an explosive


54


(of the booster


50


) that permits both a greater booster-to-booster air gap and a greater cord-to-booster air gap, as further described below.




More particularly, the booster


50


may be formed from a generally circularly cylindrical shell


52


that has a closed curved, or indented, end


56


that forms a projectile


70


(see

FIG. 4

) when an explosive


54


of the booster


50


detonates. The indented end


56


of the shell


52


is to be contrasted to a conventional booster, such as the booster


10


depicted in

FIG. 1

, that has a flat closed end


24


. In particular, after detonation of the explosive, the flat end


24


typically breaks apart to produce a “shotgun pattern” of several projectiles


47


, as depicted in FIG.


5


. These projectiles


47


may not propagate across a booster-to-booster air gap


68


along an approximate straight line, but rather, the projectiles


47


may spread further apart as the projectiles


47


travel toward the receptor booster


10




b.


As a result, the larger the span of the air gap


68


, the less chance that a sufficient number of the projectiles


47


(if any) will strike the receptor booster


10




b.






In contrast to the flat end


24


, the indented end


56


of the shell


52


produces the projectile


70


that is larger than any of the smaller projectiles


47


that is produced by a conventional booster. In some embodiments, the projectile


70


assumes an expanded and substantially planar shape after detonation of the explosive


54


, a feature permits sufficient contact with the receptor booster


65


to detonate its explosive. Thus, instead of breaking into several projectiles that scatter over a large area, the piece of the shell


52


that forms the indented closed end


56


remains in substantially one piece after detonation of the explosive


54


, travels in a substantially straight path toward the receptor booster


65


, and is shaped (in the form of the projectile


70


) to maximize contact with the receptor booster


65


. Due to these features, the span of the air gap


68


may be larger than the span used with conventional boosters. Due to these features, the span of the air gap


68


may be larger than the span used with conventional boosters.




In the context of this application, the phrase “indented end” or “curved end” generally may include an end that has a smooth surface or an end that is formed in a piecewise fashion from several surfaces.




In some embodiments, the indented end


56


is generally convex with respect to the explosive


54


that is housed by the shell


52


, and the explosive


54


is located next to the indented end


56


. A detonating cord


58


may be inserted into an open end


57


of the shell


52


so that the end of the detonating cord


58


is located near the explosive


54


. When a detonation train propagates down the detonating cord


58


to the explosive


54


, the explosive


54


detonates, an event that dislodges the indented end


56


to produce the projectile


70


. The projectile


70


travels across the air gap


68


and strikes the receptor booster


65


that, in turn, initiates a detonation train on another detonating cord


66


that is attached to the receptor booster


65


.




As an example of a particular design, the indented end


56


may be convex with respect to the explosive


54


and have a near uniform radius of curvature that defines the convexity of the indented end


56


. The shell


52


may include a generally circularly cylindrical tube


53


that has the indented end


56


that closes one end of the tube


53


and may include the open end


57


for receiving an end of the detonating cord


58


. The explosive


54


is packed inside the tube


53


near the closed end


54


. To attach the booster


50


to the end of the detonating cord


58


, the end of detonating cord


58


is inserted into the open end


57


of the tube


53


so the end of the detonating cord


58


rests near the explosive


54


. After insertion of the detonating cord


58


, one or more crimping rings


60


may be formed in the shell


52


(by a crimping tool, for example) to secure the detonating cord


58


in place.




In some embodiments, the cross-sectional diameter of the tube


53


may be approximately one quarter of an inch, and the radius of curvature of the indented end


56


may be approximately two inches. Thus, in some embodiments, the radius of curvature of the indented end


56


may be approximately eight times as large as the cross-sectional diameter of the tube


53


. In some embodiments, the shell


52


may be formed out of a metal (aluminum, for example).




The above-described design is an example of one of several possible designs. Other designs, dimensions and shapes may be made and are within the scope of the appended claims. As examples, other dimensions for the radius of curvature of the indented end


56


may be used, other shapes from the indented end


56


may be used, other cross-sectional diameters, other ratios between the above-described dimensions are possible, and other general shapes of the shell are possible.




As depicted in

FIG. 4

, the receptor booster


65


may have a similar design to the donor booster


50


. As a result of this symmetry, either booster may be used as the donor booster, thereby making it difficult to mix the donor and the receptor boosters.




As examples, in some embodiments, the explosive


20


may be an explosive called 2,2-4,4-6,6 hexanitrostilbene (hereinafter referred to as “HNS”) or an explosive called cyclotetramethylenetetra-nitramine (hereinafter referred to as “HMX”). Furthermore, in some embodiments, these explosives may be “tipped” by an explosive called 2,2′,2″,4,4′,4″,6,6′,6″-nonanitroterphenyl (hereinafter referred to as “NONA”), as described below.




In some embodiments, the explosive


54


may be primarily formed from NONA (one hundred percent NONA, for example), an arrangement that increases the permissible spans of the cord-to-booster and booster-to-booster air gaps, even if the indented end


56


is not used. The primary use of NONA to form the explosive is to be contrasted to conventional arrangements that may use a small amount of NONA to “tip” another explosive. For example,

FIG. 6

depicts a conventional booster


42


that uses a small portion


44


(as compared to the total amount of explosive being used) of NONA between the end of a detonating cord


41


and a larger portion of another explosive


46


(HNS, for example) and a small portion


48


of NONA between the explosive


46


and a closed flat end


43


of the booster


42


. Thus, each end of the explosive


46


is “tipped” with NONA.




It has been discovered that the use of primarily NONA in the booster


50


may produce a significant performance improvement versus the explosive combinations described above. More particularly, to evaluate the performance gained by using primarily NONA, two tests (described below) were conducted in which NONA was used solely as the explosive


54


in the booster


50


. These tests are compared below to tests conducted with conventional boosters (such as the booster


10


) that use HMX, HNS and HNS tipped with NONA at both ends as the explosive. For these tests, the booster had a length of about 1.37 inches and a cross-sectional diameter of about 0.25 inches. Approximately 600 milligrams (mg) of explosive(s) were used in the booster for each test.




One test measured a cord-to-booster fifty percent firing gap, a cord-to-booster air gap in which the detonation is successful fifty percent of the time. When HNS was used as the explosive in the conventional booster, the cord-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 0.104 inches. When HNS tipped with NONA was used as the explosive in the conventional booster, the cord-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 0.150 inches. However, a significant improvement was observed when only NONA was used as the sole explosive in the booster


50


, as the cord-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 0.410 inches.




Another test measured a booster-to-booster fifty percent firing gap, a booster-to-booster air gap in which the detonation is successful fifty percent of the time. When HNS was used in the conventional booster, the booster-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 2.5 inches. When HMX was used in the conventional booster, the booster-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 5.0 inches. When HNS tipped with NONA was used in the conventional booster, the booster-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 3.0 inches. However, a significant improvement was observed with the booster


50


with the indented end


56


that contained solely NONA, as the booster-to-booster fifty percent firing gap was determined to be approximately 6.0-10.0 inches.




In some embodiments, the explosive


54


may formed from approximately one hundred percent NONA, the percentage used with the booster


50


in the above-described tests. However, other embodiments are possible. For example, in other embodiments, the explosive


54


may include (by weight) approximately fifty percent or more of NONA, approximately sixty percent or more of NONA, approximately seventy percent or more NONA, approximately eighty percent or more of NONA or approximately ninety percent or more of NONA, depending on the particular embodiment.




While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A booster to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to another booster, comprising:an explosive; and a shell housing the explosive, the shell having an open end to receive an end of the detonating cord and an indented closed end being adapted to form a projectile from the shell to strike said another booster when the explosive detonates, wherein the closed end is formed from a piece of material that is shaped to prevent the piece from substantially disintegrating when the explosive detonates.
  • 2. The booster of claim 1, wherein the closed end is generally convex with respect to the explosive.
  • 3. The booster of claim 1, wherein the shell has a general cross-sectional diameter near the closed end and the convexity of the shell before detonation of the explosive has a radius of curvature that is approximately eight times larger than the cross-sectional diameter.
  • 4. The booster of claim 3, wherein the radius of curvature is approximately two inches.
  • 5. The booster of claim 3, wherein the cross-sectional diameter is approximately one fourth of an inch.
  • 6. The booster of claim 1, wherein the closed end is shaped to cause the projectile to become approximately flat after the explosive detonates.
  • 7. The booster of claim 1, wherein a piece of material forms the closed end and the projectile includes approximately all of the piece.
  • 8. The booster of claim 1, wherein the shell comprises a material that forms a circular cylinder and is shaped to form the indented closed end.
  • 9. A booster to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to another booster, the booster consisting essentially of:a shell adapted to receive an end of the detonating cord; and an explosive adapted to detonate in response to the detonation train and including at least approximately fifty percent of NONA by weight to form at least one projectile out of the shell to strike said another booster when the explosive detonates, wherein the shell comprises an indented closed end formed from a piece of material that is shaped to prevent the piece from substantially disintegrating when the explosive detonates.
  • 10. The booster of claim 9, wherein the explosive includes at least approximately sixty percent of NONA by weight.
  • 11. The booster of claim 9, wherein the explosive includes at least approximately seventy percent of NONA by weight.
  • 12. A The booster of claim 9, wherein the explosive includes at least approximately eighty percent of NONA by weight.
  • 13. The booster of claim 9, wherein the explosive includes at least approximately ninety percent of NONA by weight.
  • 14. The booster of claim 9, wherein the explosive includes approximately one hundred percent of NONA by weight.
  • 15. The booster of claim 9, wherein the shell includes a closed indented end that forms said at least one projectile.
  • 16. A method to relay a detonation train from a detonating cord to a booster, comprising:placing an explosive in a shell; forming an indented closed end in the shell to form a projectile from the shell to strike the booster when the explosive detonates; and shaping the closed end to cause the projectile to become approximately flat after the explosive detonates.
  • 17. A. The method of claim 16, further comprising:making the closed end generally convex with respect to the explosive.
  • 18. The method of claim 16, further comprising:forming a convexity of the shell before detonation of the explosive to have a radius of curvature that is approximately eight times larger than a cross-sectional diameter of the shell.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the radius of curvature is approximately two inches.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, wherein the cross-sectional diameter is approximately one fourth of an inch.
  • 21. The method of claim 16, further comprising:forming the closed end is formed from a piece of material; and shaping the closed end to prevent the piece from substantially disintegrating when the explosive detonates.
  • 22. The method of claim 16, further comprising:forming the closed end out of a single piece of material so that the projectile includes approximately all of the piece.
  • 23. The method of claim 16, further comprising:forming the shell from a material that is shaped to form a circular cylinder and is shaped to form the indented closed end.
  • 24. A system comprising:a first boaster coupled to a first detonating cord; a second booster coupled to a second detonating cord; and wherein the first booster relays a detonation train from the first detonating cord to the second boaster and the first booster comprises: an explosive; and a shell housing the explosive, the shell having an open end to receive an end of the first detonating cord and an indented closed end being adapted to form a projectile from the shell to strike the second boaster when the explosive detonates.
  • 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the closed end is generally convex with respect to the explosive.
  • 26. The system of claim 24, wherein the shell has a general cross-sectional diameter near the closed end and the convexity of the shell before detonation of the explosive has a radius of curvature that is approximately eight times larger than the cross-sectional diameter.
  • 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the radius of curvature is approximately two inches.
  • 28. The system of claim 26, wherein the cross-sectional diameter is approximately one fourth of an inch.
  • 29. The system of claim 24, wherein the closed end is shaped to cause the projectile to become approximately flat after the explosive detonates.
  • 30. The system of claim 24, wherein the closed end is formed from a piece of material and the closed end is shaped to prevent the piece from substantially disintegrating when the explosive detonates.
  • 31. The system of claim 24, wherein a piece of material forms the closed end and the projectile includes approximately all of the piece.
  • 32. The system of claim 24, wherein the shell comprises a material that forms a circular cylinder and is shaped to form the indented closed end.
  • 33. A method comprising:connecting a first detonating cord to a first booster; connecting a second detonating cord to a second booster; placing an explosive in a shell of the first booster; forming an indented closed end in the shell to form a projectile from the shell; and striking the second booster with the projectile in response to the detonation of the explosive to relay a detonation train from the first detonating cord to the second detonating cord.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, further comprising:making the closed end generally convex with respect to the explosive.
  • 35. The method of claim 33, further comprising:forming a convexity of the shell before detonation of the explosive to have a radius of curvature that is approximately eight times larger than a cross-sectional diameter of the shell.
  • 36. The method of claim 35, wherein the radius of curvature is approximately two inches.
  • 37. The method of claim 35, wherein the cross-sectional diameter is approximately one fourth of an inch.
  • 38. The method of claim 33, further comprising:shaping the closed end to cause the projectile to become approximately flat in response to the detonation of the explosive.
  • 39. The method of claim 33, further comprising:forming the closed end is formed from a piece of material; and shaping the closed end to prevent the piece from substantially disintegrating in response to the detonation of the explosive.
  • 40. The method of claim 33, further comprising:forming the closed end out of a single piece of material so that the projectile includes approximately all of the piece.
  • 41. The method of claim 33, further comprising:forming the shell from a material that is shaped to form a circular cylinder and is shaped to form the indented closed end.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/129,749, entitled, “BOOSTER,” filed on Apr. 16, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
2535518 Rich Dec 1950 A
2618221 Lowe Nov 1952 A
2923239 Andrew et al. Feb 1960 A
4735145 Johnson et al. Apr 1988 A
4998477 Barker Mar 1991 A
5503077 motley Apr 1996 A
5631440 Thureson et al. May 1997 A
6047643 Benner et al. Apr 2000 A
6397752 Yang et al. Jun 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
257 649 May 1925 GB
579 281 Jul 1946 GB
708 422 May 1954 GB
2 246 620 Feb 1992 GB
WO 9007689 Jul 1990 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/129749 Apr 1999 US