This application is related to allowed U.S. Design Patent Application 29/535,997, filed Aug. 12, 2015.
This application is related to pending U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/557,452, filed Mar. 9, 2016, which is a divisional application of allowed U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/535,997, filed Aug. 12, 2015.
This application is related to pending U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/557,456, filed Mar. 9, 2016, which is a divisional application of allowed U.S. Design patent application Ser. No. 29/535,997, filed Aug. 12, 2015.
The field of the disclosure is related to bottle caps in general and bottle caps having integrated bottle openers, in specific.
Beer and soft drink bottles usually have tightly crimped bottle caps. These bottle caps are typically either pop-off or twist-off caps. The removal of the bottle cap requires a significant amount of force, which a person with normal strength would find difficult to remove by hand. More so, some individuals with hand problems may find it too painful to remove a bottle cap without mechanical assistance, such as by using a bottle cap opener. Often, make-shift items, such as keys, screwdrivers, lighters, or currency coins, are used to assist in opening bottle caps. The use of make-shift items may lead to injury if not used correctly or for their intended use.
Furthermore, conventional bottle openers may often be misplaced or unavailable.
Therefore, there is room for improvement within the art.
Implementations of the present technology will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the FIGURES.
It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments described herein. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments described herein can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, methods, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the related relevant feature being described. Also, the description is not to be considered as limiting the scope of the embodiments described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale and the proportions of certain parts have been exaggerated to better illustrate details and features of the present disclosure. Similar reference numerals are used to refer to structures similar to the various exemplary embodiments.
A first exemplary embodiment of a bottle cap with an integrated bottle opener 100 is shown in
The exemplary bottle cap 100 comprises a cap body 110 for covering an opening 10 of a bottle 5, such as shown in
As shown in
Cap body 110 firmly connects to the bottle cap 100 to the bottle 5. For example, cap body 100 may have threads 117 for cooperating with threads 12 of its associated bottle 5 or a press-fit structure (not shown) firmly connects the bottle cap 100 to the bottle 5.
Bottle opener 115 may comprise a groove formed as: a depression or well 115a for receiving a lower portion of the bottle cap 15 to be removed; an engagement surface 115b, preferably formed as a sloping planar or curved surface (see comparison in
To remove cap 15, cap 15 is inserted into bottle opener 115, cap 15 is engaged by hook 115c. Then, one or both, of bottle 5 and 20 are moved relative to each other in the direction of arrow A-A of
As shown in
As shown in
In this second exemplary embodiment, the cap body 110 comprises: a first cap body portion 210 and a second cap body portion 220. The first cap body portion 210 is cylindrical and having an upper portion 211. Depression or well 115a surrounded by hook 115c is located in upper portion 211. The second cap body portion 220 is an inverted substantially frustoconical body having conical surfaces 221. The conical surfaces 221 of the second cap body portion act as the engagement surface 115b. The bottle opener groove 115 comprises a space between the well 115a of the first cap body portion 210 and the top of the second cap body portion 220.
To remove cap 15 using bottle cap 200 with integrated bottle opener, the same procedure as shown in
As shown in
In the exemplary embodiment of
To remove cap 15 using bottle cap 300 with integrated bottle opener, the same procedure as shown in
The various exemplary embodiments are convenient to use because their integral bottle openers are accessible even when the cap body covers the opening of the bottle. In other words, as opposed to bottle openers shown in, for example, U.S. Design Pat. D653,512, removal of the bottle cap from its associated bottle is not required to access or use the bottle cap opener.
Advantages of having a bottle cap with an integrated bottle opener can be seen in various situations.
One example is when the cap with an integrated bottle opener is fastened to a beverage bottle containing a beer mix such as a Bloody Mary mix. The integrated bottle opener embodiment's convenient location on top of such beverage bottle allows for easy finding. This reduces the amount of time lost in trying to find a bottle opener. Also, since the liquid content is a complement to beer, it's highly likely to find both the mix and beer located near each other or reasonably near one another due to their complementing uses. Possible locations of such invention embodiment when attached to a beer mix beverage bottle are in an ice chest, refrigerator or on top of a table/shelf. This permits convenience of use. For example, when a user desires to add beer mix to his/her beer, a consumer may simply utilize any of the disclosed exemplary embodiments to remove the twist off or pop off beer bottle cap. Further noting, that both items will be in close proximity with each other, also maximizes the use of a beverage bottle utilizing such invention embodiment.
Other potential benefits of the exemplary embodiments of the bottle caps with integrated bottle openers described herein may include: the bottle cap can serve multiple purposes, such as bottle cap and bottle cap opener; being simple, compact and economical to manufacture; conveniently located to assist in opening bottles; optimizes use of a bottle cap by providing it with additional functions; reduces environmental impact because of multiple uses and when applicable, recyclable materials; and bottle leverage improves ease of use with less force required to open bottled beverages.
The embodiments shown and described above are only examples. Therefore, many such details are neither shown nor described. Even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present technology have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the present disclosure, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in the detail, especially in decorative and structural matters of shape, size and arrangement of the parts within the principles of the present disclosure up to, and including the full extent established by the broad general meaning of the terms used in the claims. It will therefore be appreciated that the embodiments described above may be modified within the scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
757548 | Goodrich | Apr 1904 | A |
952085 | Stephens | Mar 1910 | A |
1341163 | Beste | May 1920 | A |
1725726 | Cotton | Aug 1929 | A |
1916115 | Perkins | Jun 1933 | A |
2020205 | Perkins | Nov 1935 | A |
2347734 | Cowan, Jr. | May 1944 | A |
2447146 | Vogel | Aug 1948 | A |
D172571 | Ward | Jul 1954 | S |
2682985 | Colonna | Jul 1954 | A |
2754821 | Burbig | Jul 1956 | A |
3236126 | Martinmaas | Feb 1966 | A |
3272369 | Kjellsen Grimsley Arvid | Sep 1966 | A |
3300074 | Heubl | Jan 1967 | A |
3542231 | Wettermann | Nov 1970 | A |
3736817 | Huff | Jun 1973 | A |
3812741 | Heine | May 1974 | A |
3997077 | Mill | Dec 1976 | A |
4103798 | Moeller | Aug 1978 | A |
4403712 | Wiesinger | Sep 1983 | A |
4433597 | Rowland | Feb 1984 | A |
D278517 | Milin | Apr 1985 | S |
4580303 | Henshaw | Apr 1986 | A |
D284553 | Collister | Jul 1986 | S |
4598435 | Borodulin | Jul 1986 | A |
4642827 | Karuzas | Feb 1987 | A |
5022288 | Taktakian | Jun 1991 | A |
5109997 | Phillips | May 1992 | A |
D339274 | Alpers | Sep 1993 | S |
5301837 | O'Meara | Apr 1994 | A |
D358311 | Sarnoff | May 1995 | S |
5464110 | Heyworth | Nov 1995 | A |
5791505 | Gilliland | Aug 1998 | A |
D399108 | Koefelda | Oct 1998 | S |
6179138 | Puleston | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212721 | Borodulin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D466381 | Joseph | Dec 2002 | S |
D476568 | Mechtold | Jul 2003 | S |
D477215 | Mechtold | Jul 2003 | S |
7296498 | Kim | Nov 2007 | B1 |
D558978 | Roesler | Jan 2008 | S |
7346958 | Parsons | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7404345 | Dipprey | Jul 2008 | B1 |
D606862 | Mora-Hernandez | Dec 2009 | S |
D628893 | Groubert | Dec 2010 | S |
D653512 | Frazier | Feb 2012 | S |
D684448 | Delgado | Jun 2013 | S |
8720714 | Romero | May 2014 | B2 |
D726007 | Beth-Jacob | Apr 2015 | S |
9073672 | Laperriere | Jul 2015 | B2 |
D736046 | Crane | Aug 2015 | S |
9242841 | Appleby | Jan 2016 | B1 |
20020175169 | Tham-Itthisak | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050035080 | Romero | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20070074604 | Lipson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080023433 | Romero | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080098853 | Choate | May 2008 | A1 |
20080223812 | Domagala | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080296249 | Lockerman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090133537 | Uglum | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145267 | Moles | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110006061 | Michiwaki | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110107878 | Gust | May 2011 | A1 |
20110297706 | Zoss | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130048592 | Carley | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130248531 | Lane | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20160023875 | Lenig | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Examiner search results from related design U.S. Appl. No. 29/535,997. |
Applicant search methodology from related design U.S. Appl. No. 29/535,997. |