This application is related to, claims the benefit of and priority from co-pending Taiwan patent application Ser. No. 103111634, filed Mar. 28, 2014, entitled BOTTLE CROWN WITH OPENER ASSEMBLY, by the same inventor, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the disclosures of U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,061,544, 8,276,773, 8,365,940, and 8,608,006, by the same inventor, are incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to caps and crowns for beverage bottles and other containers, and in particular, to a manual pull-to-open bottle cap.
A beverage bottle that opens manually with relative ease, without the use of a bottle opener, has been a long-felt need for beverage providers. Bottle caps must be tightly secured to the bottle opening to prevent spillage of the contents, loss of pressure (in the case of pressurized or carbonated beverages) and to maintain the hygienic conditions of the contents. The tight seal makes it difficult to open a bottle by hand.
Caps, also referred to interchangeably as crowns, are secured to the bottle opening by crimping the crown down over the open of the container in a series of concave arcs around the circumference of the opening. The arcs create sharp convex points between each concave arc. The arcs and points are often referred to by those skilled in art as “angles” or “flutes.”
The advent of the familiar twist-off bottle cap was a significant advance for manual bottle opening, but all too frequently one has to grip the cap so hard to twist the cap free that the points of the cap angles inflict pain on the hands or fingers. To protect the hands from injury, it is a common practice to wrap the bottle cap in the tail of a shirt or in a cloth before twisting the cap.
Bottle caps adapted with pull tabs, similar to those used for beverage cans, have been known in China and other territories of Asia. See, for example, International Patent Application PCT/CN00/00040 by Liu, priority date Mar. 4, 1999, International Publication No. WO00/51906. Such pull tab bottle caps, however, are notoriously difficult to open because they require the exertion of an uncomfortable amount of force to break the seal and then pull the tab back (tearing the metal) to remove the cap.
Another pull-tab solution for bottle caps is known as the MaxiCrown® such as is described U.S. Pat. No. 4,768,667 issued Sep. 6, 1988, to Magnusson. The MaxiCrown® provides a pull ring disposed along the side of the neck of the bottle as an extension of the crown and thus is problematic for use with standard angle-crimping bottle capping machines Indeed, a special capping machine is recommended to cap bottles with the MaxiCrown®.
There is a need, therefore, for a bottle crown that is easy to open manually yet which may be tightly sealed around the bottle opening using standard bottle capping machines common in the art.
The detailed description that follows, by way of non-limiting examples of embodiments, makes reference to the noted drawings in which reference numerals represent the same parts throughout the several views of the drawings, and in which:
In view of the foregoing, through one or more various aspects, embodiments and/or specific features or sub-components, the present disclosure is thus intended to bring out one or more of the advantages that will be evident from the description. The present disclosure makes reference to one or more specific embodiments by way of illustration and example. It is understood, therefore, that the terminology, examples, drawings and embodiments are illustrative and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. The terms “crown” and “cap” may be used interchangeably in the description that follows.
Crown or cap 1 may be connected to pull tab 3 by lever 5. Lever 5 and pull tab 3 may be joined to make a single unit. Likewise, pull tab 3 and pull tab ring 2 may be a unitary piece. The other end of pull tab 3 may be riveted to the approximate center of the surface on the body of the cap of crown cap 1 by rivet 4.
Cutting line 6 tapers downward from angle 7 at the rim of cap 1 toward the approximate center of cap 1 to provide a tapered tearing groove. For example, the depth of the tapered groove may graduate from a depth in the range of approximately 0.03 to 0.02 mm near the rim of cap 1 to a depth in the range of approximately 0.10 to 0.08 mm by rivet 4 near the center of cap 1.
While terminus 9 of the tearing groove near the center of cap 1 is depicted in
By varying the depth of the groove along cutting line 6, as in either of the embodiments of
In operation, a person grasps ring 2 near tab 3 so as to pivot ring 2 on lever 5 while pulling up and back along cutting line 6. Lever 5 and rivet 4 may act in concert to crack open cap 1 at the center while manual force continues tearing cap 1 along lines 6 until cap 1 is substantially split apart so that cap 1 may be easily removed from a bottle. The tearing groove of cutting line 6 facilitates manually tearing cap 1 along line 6.
Advantageously, the embodiments of
Lever 5 is provided for leverage and additional shearing force to rend open the tinplate material of crown 1.
Another feature illustrated in
The reason score line 6 of
Further regarding score line 6, one consideration of a crown of the present disclosure is the ease with which the material of crown 1 can be torn once opened by the opener assembly. The ease of tearing relates to the amount of pull force that needs to be applied to tear the crown material. Pulling force may be reduced, that is, ease of tearing may be increased, with the use of crown coatings or lacquers known in the art that contain additives which increase the ease of tearing, by reducing the required pull force, of the crown 1 material along line 6. Specific embodiments may also include degradable plastic additives for the liner attached to the underside of the crown to facilitate biodegradation of the liner after a used crown has been disposed of as waste. A variety of commercially available bio-degradable plastic additives are known in the art and the selection of one or more such additives is a matter of design choice.
In addition to the various structures described herein, certain advantages over the prior art are bestowed on the present crown by the recommended specifications shown in Table 1.
In particular, a tinplate material which demonstrates an approximate hardness of T-4 on the Rockwell 30T Hardness Scale is preferred for the present cap (see item 3 in table 1), although embodiments of T-3 and T-5 are advantageous for particular products. The preferred soft tinplate material requires less force to open and tear with the opener assembly of the present crown while still providing sufficient sealing of the container contents. For the purposes of this disclosure, tinplate refers the any material, including tin or tin alloys, from which a crown may be fabricated and does not necessarily mean that the crown is made from tin or a tin alloy.
A pulling force for a pull ring of the present disclosure of approximately 2.5 kg (kilograms) or less is preferred (see item 11 of Table 1). A relatively small pull force such as this is recommended so that virtually everyone will have sufficient strength to open a bottle using a crown of the present disclosure. In contrast, a relatively large pull force has the disadvantage of requiring a great amount of initial force to tear the tinplate material, and once the tinplate is torn open the sudden release of pulling force causes the bottle to jerk away from the user, spilling the contents often in dramatic fashion.
In addition to the low hardness of the tinplate, the thinness or gauge of the crown may also contribute to achieving a small pull force. For example, a crown of the present invention is recommended to have a thickness of less than 0.28 mm (see item 2 in Table 1). Typical bottle crowns have a thickness of 0.28 mm or greater. Embodiments in which the crown material is strengthened by corrugation, such as in seated embodiments, may be thinner than standard crowns, having, for example, a gauge as thin as approximately 0.16 mm.
In addition to the foregoing embodiments described above, an additional embodiment provides a reduced gauge crown that delivers additional advantages.
Billions of bottle caps are used worldwide and the cost of the caps is largely determined by the amount of material required for the caps. One way to reduced such costs is to reduce the amount of material used in each crown. The amount of material can be reduced by making the crown thin, or reducing the gauge of the crown. A reduced gauge could be achieved by using less material but this might compromise the integrity of the crown by making the crown weaker. Another approach would be to use less material but use a stronger material. However, stronger materials might be more expensive than standard tin plate typically used in crown manufacture, which would defeat the cost savings purpose. An approach that reduces the amount of material but uses the same material without compromising strength is to corrugate the crown. Such corrugation is described herein in regards to
Turning now to
Seat 18 is recessed, that is, it is lower than top 110 but is contiguous with top 110 by virtue of transition surface 120, which will be referred to herein for convenience as recess 120. Recess 120 may formed in crown 1 in a variety of suitable ways to provide advantageous shapes. For example, in specific exemplary embodiments concentric tiers, grooves or steps are integrally formed in the crown 1 material until the desired depth of seat 18 is obtained, as illustrated in
Skirt 7 descends from top 110 along the external perimeter of crown 1 and in specific exemplary embodiments smoothly merges into a downwardly and radially outwardly extending flange. The skirt 7 is preferably adapted to be crimped onto the neck of a bottle for sealing. Specific exemplary embodiments of skirt 7 are divided into undulating, repeating portions that define the flutes 150 and lands 152. Preferably, the repeating portions are circumferentially evenly spaced apart such that each flute 150 is identical to all other flutes 150 around the circumference of the crown cap 1, and each land 152 is identical to all other lands 152 around the circumference of the crown cap 1. It should be understood that the crown cap 1 may include any number of flutes 150 and lands 152.
Referring to now to
A specific amount of material strengthening from corrugation is achieved by selecting an embodiment with a particular combination of seat diameter 210, 310 or 410, for example, and recess depth 220, 320 or 420, for example. Exemplary embodiment 27A/B, for instance, has seat diameter 210, which is relatively wide, and recess depth 220, which is intermediately deep. Exemplary embodiment 28A/B has seat width 310, which is of intermediate width, and recess depth 320, which is the deepest of the three exemplary embodiments. Exemplary embodiment 29A/B has seat diameter 410, which is the narrowest of the embodiments, and recess depth 420, which is the shallowest depth of the three embodiments. To obtain a desired amount of material strengthening from corrugation, a combination of seat width 210, 310, or 410, for example, and recess depth 220, 320 or 420, for example, is selected to achieve a specific embodiment.
Corrugation strengthens materials. This is particularly true of laminar materials formed into a sheet or plane. A laminar product can use less of a material if the material is corrugated provide lateral strength. A bottle cap is a laminar product in which the sheet material, often steel or tin plate, is shaped to be affixed to the top of a bottle or other container. A standard pry-off or twist off cap has a thickness of material that is predominantly determined by considerations of leak prevention and the secureness of the attachment of the cap to the container.
Corrugation allows caps that use less material to have the equivalent strength of a standard thick crown. A corrugated crown is thinner, that is, it has a reduced gauge, in comparison to a standard bottle cap. An advantage of a reduced gauge cap is the money savings obtained by using less material.
Another advantage of a reduced gauge corrugated cap comes into play with innovated “pull-off” caps, which have a pull tab assembly attached to the crown as described herein above. The pull tab breaks the cap material and the crown is torn off the bottle using the pull tab ring of an opener assembly. A reduced gauge cap facilitates the tear off because the cap material is thin and the tearing action is parallel to the direction of material strengthening provided by the corrugation and therefor the tearing force does not have to overcome the material strengthening of the corrugation. Corrugation affords material strengthening perpendicular to the direction of corrugation.
In addition to the structures illustrated in the figures herein, it is understood that other structures will imbue a cap of the present disclosure with the advantages of corrugation and provide a reduced gauge crown for a bottle. For instance, concentric rings, which progress from the top of the skirt toward the center of the seat, and decorative shapes such as stars, brand logos, sports team logos, religious insignia, and the like, formed in the plane of the cap, are embraced in the present disclosure.
Corrugation forms may be provided to a bottle cap by a variety means, including without limitation, metal stamping, pressing, embossing and so forth. Non-metal crowns of the present disclosure may be formed by injection molding for plastic crowns, or by other suitable means of production.
Specific embodiments of the corrugated crown caps described herein, such as embodiments for pry-off or twist off, are formed with steel of increased hardness compared with conventional crown caps presently in commercial production. For example, conventional crown caps are often formed of single reduced, T4, tinplate having a thickness of from 0.21 mm to 0.23 mm. Such tinplate has an average hardness (that is, the reported hardness value regardless of +/− variations) of approximately 61 on a 30T hardness scale, in accordance with ASTM 623. Crown caps 1 described herein may be made thinner and lighter weight compared with the prior art, for example, crown caps 1 may be formed of a material having a thickness of about 0.16 mm to 0.18 mm that have the same or roughly equal performance as conventional, thicker caps. These decreases in metal usage are more easily achieved when the structure of crown caps 1 are made with steel having increased hardness. For example, the inventor has demonstrated the effectiveness of low gauge crowns having grooves using DR8 (according to ASTM 623) or DR550 (according to EN10203). Optionally, the inventor surmises that other materials may be used, such as single reduced tinplate or like material having enhance tempering, tin-free steel having similar properties as those described herein, and the like.
The crown caps 1 preferably have an average hardness of greater than 62 on the 30T scale (conforming to ASTM 623), more preferably greater than about 65, more preferably greater than about 68, more preferably greater than about 71. The embodiments shown in
The crown caps 1 may be formed with conventional press equipment, with only minor changes to parts of the tooling to form the structure (such as the grooves, crosses, stars, and dimples). And crown caps 1 may be crimped with conventional equipment, only modified to have a smaller throat compared with existing, conventional crimpers.
Because hardness has a relationship to strength as reflected in the yield point, the aspect of the hardness of the crown may be expressed in yield point on a corresponding scale. For example, DR8 or DR550 tinplate may has a yield point (in a tensile test) of 550 MPA.
However, it will be understood that for pull tab opener embodiments, softer materials, such as softer tinplate than T4 or even aluminum, are advantageous because they facilitate ease of opening and tearing. The strength provided by corrugation permits the use of a relatively soft crown material while preserving the strength required for secure closure of the container. The inventor believes that the most advantageous crown cap embodiment has a combination of strength for secure closure and softness for ease of opening and tearing that is a matter of design and engineering choice. A crown of the present disclosure encompasses crown caps that do not have all of the structure, materials, and/or advantages in this specification.
According to this description, commercially acceptable crown caps formed according to the present disclosure can be commercially made with up to 25 percent less material (e.g., steel or tinplate) compared with many conventional crown caps, which has corresponding advantages in carbon emissions. The savings in material weight are approximately proportionate to the reduction in metal thickness. Further, even though energy required to cool an individual crown is tiny, the energy required to cool the total number of crowns produced each year (approximately 45 billion in North America and approximately 300 billion throughout the world), and the corresponding reduction in that energy, is significant.
The Reduced Gauge Crown has an impact on reducing the cost of the tinplate or steel, and the PVC/PVC free liner material, which is available with an additive, making both the metal crown and PVC or PVC free liner, biodegradable in an “active landfill”.
With the resulting lower production and weight in transportation costs in the RGC, in turn, reduce CO2 emissions.
Tinplate or steel used to produce crowns for the beer or soda industry varies between 0.21 mm-0.24 mm. The present reduced gauge crown may use a thickness of between 0.17 mm-0.19 mm. A standard pry-off or twist-off crown, weighs approximately 2.38 grams, whereas the reduced gauge crown weighs approximately 2.14 grams, a 10% reduction in weight yielding a savings in material costs.
A further benefit of the reduced gauge crown is seen in the transportation costs of crowns. A reduction in weight relates to a savings in transportation fuel costs, wear and tear on the transportation vehicles, and reduced transportation carbon dioxide emissions. Standard bottle crowns are traditionally packed 10,000 per carton, as indicated in Table 1, but with the reduced gauge crown embodiment of the present crown, a carton holds 11,000 crowns, thus providing reduced energy, transportation, and carbon dioxide emissions.
Advantages of the reduced gauge crown embodiment include, without limitation, cost savings in production, lower price per crown, lower transportation costs, lower loading costs, as well as reduced carbon dioxide emissions.
In addition to all of the embodiments described herein above, an additional feature is suitable for use with of each of the embodiments as a matter of engineering, design or marketing choice, which is the employment of temperature-sensitive color-changing ink, so-called thermochromic ink, such as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,634,516 to Carballido, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Such thermochromic inks have the property of changing color so as to be one color at room temperature (approximately 21° C.) and a different color when refrigerated to, for example standard retail refrigeration temperature of 4° C. In an exemplary application, the ink is transparent, for example, at room temperature but becomes relatively opaque and visible at chilled temperature, such that a customer has visual confirmation of the approximate temperature without touching the container.
Returning now to the figures, the present disclosure contemplates a variety of alternative exemplary embodiments with respect to the arrangement of score lines in relation to the placement of the opener assembly.
Turning to
We now turn to the embodiments having an off-center pull tab assembly location with the various score lines corresponding to those described above for
The illustrations of embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments, and they are not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of apparatus and systems that might make use of the structures described herein. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural, materials, and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Figures are merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions thereof may be exaggerated, while others may be minimized. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
The description has made reference to several exemplary embodiments. It is understood, however, that the words that have been used are words of description and illustration, rather than words of limitation. Changes may be made within the purview of the appended claims, as presently stated and as amended, without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure in all its aspects. Although description makes reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particulars disclosed; rather, the disclosure extends to all functionally equivalent technologies, structures, methods and uses such as are within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103111634 A | Mar 2014 | TW | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
771712 | Coale et al. | Oct 1904 | A |
786521 | Schroeder | Apr 1905 | A |
800867 | Mulvaney | Oct 1905 | A |
814531 | Gillette | Mar 1906 | A |
876149 | Cook | Jan 1908 | A |
1168386 | Gaston | Jan 1916 | A |
1233896 | McDonnell | Jul 1917 | A |
1294171 | Rockwell | Feb 1919 | A |
1413256 | Carvalho et al. | Apr 1922 | A |
1516207 | Rockwell | Nov 1924 | A |
1639857 | Planski | Aug 1927 | A |
1693117 | McDonnell | Nov 1928 | A |
1899210 | Ramsay | Feb 1933 | A |
2046173 | Lenhoff | Jun 1936 | A |
2099056 | Ferngren | Nov 1937 | A |
2104344 | Heymann | Jan 1938 | A |
2187454 | Hutaff, Jr. | Jan 1940 | A |
2191447 | Beardsley | Feb 1940 | A |
2233904 | Wagner | Mar 1941 | A |
2327454 | Punte | Aug 1943 | A |
2327455 | Punte | Aug 1943 | A |
2387955 | Tilson | Oct 1945 | A |
2696318 | Kihm | Dec 1954 | A |
2829790 | Isele-Aregger | Apr 1958 | A |
3057501 | Kroenert | Oct 1962 | A |
3122253 | Hagmann et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
3195755 | Scharf | Jul 1965 | A |
3199705 | Brockett | Aug 1965 | A |
3206055 | Helbling | Sep 1965 | A |
3207350 | Hagmann et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3266659 | Frankenberg | Aug 1966 | A |
3268368 | Mackiw et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3380609 | Potts | Apr 1968 | A |
3450291 | Lovell | Jun 1969 | A |
3451367 | Henrickson | Jun 1969 | A |
3462036 | Chaolu | Aug 1969 | A |
3479790 | LaBarge | Nov 1969 | A |
3480173 | Wheaton | Nov 1969 | A |
3522899 | Siemonsen et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3540611 | Nishikawa | Nov 1970 | A |
3545638 | Brown | Dec 1970 | A |
3556336 | Coop | Jan 1971 | A |
3561631 | Hatfield et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3598272 | Bustamante et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3618816 | Brown | Nov 1971 | A |
3630405 | Podesta | Dec 1971 | A |
3674172 | Wells et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3701454 | Thorp et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3724700 | Heffran | Apr 1973 | A |
3734333 | Foss | May 1973 | A |
3743129 | Willis | Jul 1973 | A |
3823841 | Lovejoy | Jul 1974 | A |
3834573 | Amos | Sep 1974 | A |
3851793 | Brown | Dec 1974 | A |
3870184 | Fuchs et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3905503 | Fraze | Sep 1975 | A |
3908856 | Perry | Sep 1975 | A |
3920142 | Vandrebeck et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3931904 | Coop | Jan 1976 | A |
3940254 | McMullen et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3957172 | Hasegawa | May 1976 | A |
3958710 | Harding et al. | May 1976 | A |
RE28862 | Siemonsen et al. | Jun 1976 | E |
3963140 | Harding | Jun 1976 | A |
3963141 | Liu | Jun 1976 | A |
3979002 | Faulstich | Sep 1976 | A |
4003488 | Moller | Jan 1977 | A |
4004705 | Fujio | Jan 1977 | A |
4060172 | Amabili | Nov 1977 | A |
4066180 | Sanchez | Jan 1978 | A |
4087018 | Tebbutt | May 1978 | A |
4089753 | McMullen et al. | May 1978 | A |
4106422 | Buhrke | Aug 1978 | A |
4176014 | Ruscoe et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4184605 | Hanson | Jan 1980 | A |
4227619 | Magnusson | Oct 1980 | A |
4247374 | Ruscoe et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4279968 | Ruscoe et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4318493 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4453644 | Berglund | Jun 1984 | A |
4465204 | Kaminski et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
RE31869 | Harding | Apr 1985 | E |
4534481 | Summers et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4569621 | Sjogren et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4579761 | Ruscoe et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4733793 | Moen | Mar 1988 | A |
4768667 | Magnusson | Sep 1988 | A |
4930656 | Bianchette | Jun 1990 | A |
5020686 | Dutt | Jun 1991 | A |
5069345 | Irwin | Dec 1991 | A |
5080245 | Conard | Jan 1992 | A |
5143241 | Szymanski | Sep 1992 | A |
5145084 | Murayama et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5458253 | Shapcott | Oct 1995 | A |
5741105 | Schubert et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5799816 | Schubert | Sep 1998 | A |
5924739 | Garbutt | Jul 1999 | A |
6006933 | Henning et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6105806 | Stasiuk | Aug 2000 | A |
6138856 | Ghim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6283318 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336307 | O'Connor | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6533518 | Turner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6808351 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
8061544 | Frishman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8276773 | Frishman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8365940 | Frishman | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8608006 | Frishman | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8944264 | Frishman | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9321562 | Frishman | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20020104852 | Staniszewski et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020195414 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030053890 | Turner et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030092364 | Erickson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030150834 | Verderber | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030201266 | Steffan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050092751 | Alvares et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050279432 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070181526 | Frishman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100096355 | Chaolu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100183406 | Gysi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200534 | Frishman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100326949 | Merino Caballero | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024381 | Frishman | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120261380 | Frishman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120308337 | Gysi et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20150034586 | Frishman | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150157535 | Frishman | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150284136 | Frishman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298868 | Frishman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150314362 | Frishman | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160083136 | Frishman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
503394 | Jun 1951 | BE |
2094345 | Jan 1992 | CN |
201321197 | Oct 2009 | CN |
201729365 | Feb 2011 | CN |
103998348 | Aug 2014 | CN |
1038934 | Sep 1958 | DE |
2015629 | Oct 1971 | DE |
8527425 | Jan 1986 | DE |
3906112 | Aug 1990 | DE |
29600761 | Jan 1997 | DE |
0262767 | Apr 1988 | EP |
322592 | Feb 1903 | FR |
2118176 | Jul 1972 | FR |
599704 | Mar 1948 | GB |
759417 | Oct 1956 | GB |
1377767 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1279068 | Jun 1976 | GB |
1540229 | Feb 1979 | GB |
S47-4776 | Feb 1972 | JP |
S56-161525 | May 1983 | JP |
S 60-2448 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S61-112350 | Jan 1986 | JP |
S62-108250 | Jul 1987 | JP |
H02-087756 | Mar 1990 | JP |
3533626 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005047621 | Feb 2005 | JP |
WO 0051906 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0071430 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2006048903 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2009009429 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009035472 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2013052219 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/013464, dated May 15, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/053131 dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/053131 dated Jun. 11, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/032870, dated Aug. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/028541, dated Jul. 22, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/002421 dated Oct. 17, 2006. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2006/002421, dated Jul. 15, 2008. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/000891, dated Jul. 16, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/000891, dated Jul. 28, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/067134, dated Apr. 24, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/067134, dated Apr. 8, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/047949, dated Nov. 5, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/047949, dated Jun. 3, 2013. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP 12838359 dated Jan. 23, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/014555, dated May 22, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/014555, dated Mar. 23, 2015. |
Supplemental European Search Report for EP14745376.5 dated Sep. 8, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/063384, dated Sep. 22, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150274353 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |