1. Technical Field
This disclosure generally relates to bottles and more particularly related to bottles with improved top loading resistance.
2. Description of the Related Art
Liquid, flowable and/or squeezable consumer products have been marketed in plastic bottles, such as those made of polyolefins or polyesters. Exemplary bottle materials include polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). While conventionally packaged in non-transparent containers with relatively thick sidewalls, larger quantities (e.g. 500-2000 mL) of heavier products, such as cleaning or detergent liquids, are now capable of being packaged in durable and recyclable plastic bottles with transparent and relatively thinner sidewalls.
Those bottles filled with liquid products often need to be vertically stacked on top of one another, such as during transportation, warehouse storage and/or at point-of-purchase display. The top loading resistance of the bottles required for stacking may depend upon the type of products and the specific stacking configurations. However, conventional plastic bottles generally have limited and insufficient top loading resistance, especially when the products are heavier liquids. As a result, bottles filled with liquid products in the bottom may be subjected to substantial top loading forces and may buckle or even collapse, causing economic loss in terms of inventory replacement and the labor needed for clean-up, or damage to the facility or vehicle in which the collapse occurs.
Accordingly, efforts have been directed to increasing the top loading resistance of plastic bottles. For example, additional structural features such as sidewall ribs, sidewall panels, and bottom ribs, have been found to improve the top loading resistance of plastic bottles. These structural features, however, are not without their cost. In particular, the panels and ribs often require more plastic material to be used, which is undesirable both economically and environmentally.
Bottles with variable wall thickness are also known in the art. For example, it has been found that gradual thickening of the sidewall (up to four times), both upwardly toward the shoulder and neck portions and downwardly toward the bottom base portion, improves bottle strength against laterally imposed stacking and crushing loads, such as in a vending machine. However, the effectiveness of such wall thickness profile against top loading forces remains to be established.
Bottles with improved top loading resistance are disclosed herein. The bottles may have variable wall thickness and/or specific shoulder angles to improve top loading resistance. The bottle may also include other structural features such as surface grooves, ribs, and convex bottom walls.
In one exemplary embodiment, the bottle includes a mouth, a barrel connected to a base, and a shoulder extending between the mouth and barrel. The shoulder includes upper, intermediate, and lower sections. The intermediate section may be relatively thicker than the upper section of the shoulder.
In another exemplary embodiment, the bottle includes a mouth, a barrel connected to a base, and a shoulder extending between the mouth and barrel. The barrel includes upper, intermediate, and lower sections. The intermediate section may be relatively thicker than the upper section of the shoulder.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the bottle includes a mouth, a barrel connected to a base, and a shoulder extending between the mouth and barrel. The shoulder includes an intermediate surface groove that is relatively thicker than the rest of the shoulder, while the barrel includes an intermediate ribbed portion that is relatively thicker than the rest of the barrel.
As used in this disclosure, “thickness” of a structural component of a bottle refers to wall thickness unless otherwise indicated. If wall thickness of the structural component is not uniform, “thickness” used in this disclosure refers to the average wall thickness of the structural component.
Other features of the disclosed bottle will be described in greater detail below. It will also be noted here and elsewhere that the bottle disclosed herein may be suitably modified to be used in a wide variety of applications by one of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed bottle, reference should be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the disclosed exemplary embodiments are sometimes illustrated diagrammatically and in partial views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed bottle which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that this disclosure is not limited to the particular exemplary embodiments illustrated herein.
As indicated above, this disclosure is generally directed toward bottles and more particularly related to improvement of top loading resistance of such bottles. As will be explained in further detail herein, it does so by, among other things, incorporating walls of particular dimensions and tapers, providing shoulder and other transition zones at particular angles, and/or utilizing other structural features. It is to be understood that some figures of this application illustrate bottles with different shades of grey merely for better visualization of their structural components, and should not be construed in any way as limiting the scope of this disclosure as the disclosed bottles may be transparent, translucent, opaque, or non-transparent and may be colored or colorless.
Turning to
The shoulder 30 includes an upper section 31 connected to the mouth 20, an intermediate section 32, and a lower section 33 connected to the barrel 40. The intermediate section 32 may include a diagonal surface groove 34. The surface groove 34 may have an upper portion 35 connected to a lower portion 36. As illustrated in
Turning back to
The base 50 includes a sidewall 51 connected to a bottom wall 52. The bottom wall 52 may be convex and include a peripheral region 53 and a central region 54. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is contemplated that the surface groove 34, ribs 44, and convex bottom wall 52 may each and/or collectively contribute to the top loading resistance of the bottle.
In order to further enhance the top loading resistance of the bottle 10, the thickness of the mouth 20, shoulder 30, barrel 40, and base 50, including their structural components, may be varied. The thickness profile of the bottle 10 is listed in Table 1 below, which indicates gradual upward thickening from the intermediate section 42 of the barrel 40 to the mouth 20 (from about 0.19 mm to about 1.11 mm), as well as gradual downward thickening from the intermediate section 42 of the barrel 40 to the central region 54 of the base 50 (from about 0.19 mm to about 0.90 mm).
In order to evaluate the top loading resistance of a bottle disclosed herein, the bottle was subjected to increasing vertical load (N) while the vertical deformation of the bottle (mm) was recorded until the bottle crushes. Typically, a relatively linear relationship exists between the vertical load and vertical deformation until the bottle starts to crush, at which point the vertical load remains constant or may even decrease as the vertical deformation increases. Thus, the vertical load just before crush (“crushing load”) is one parameter that may be used to characterize the top loading resistance of the bottle, with a higher crushing load indicating better top loading resistance. Another parameter than may also be used to characterize the top loading resistance of the bottle is the deformation just before crush (“crushing deformation”), with a lower crushing deformation indicating better top loading resistance.
As illustrated in
Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, such a non-linear response to vertical load may suggest a structural change and/or rigidity redistribution of the bottle 10 at around 39 N vertical load and about 0.75 mm vertical deformation, resulting in a deformed but still not completely crushed bottle with a less effective top loading response. The inventors have determined that by changing the thickness profile, shoulder angle, and/or other structural component of the bottle, a more linear top loading response with higher crushing load and/or lower crushing deformation may be achieved, an insight heretofore unknown.
To that end,
The shoulder 130 includes an upper section 131 connected to the mouth 120, an intermediate section 132, and a lower section 133 connected to the barrel 140. The intermediate section 132 may include a diagonal surface groove 134. The surface groove 134 may have an upper portion 135 connected to a lower portion 136. Unlike the bottle 10 illustrated in
Turning back to
In order to further enhance the top loading resistance of the bottle 100, the thickness of the mouth 120, shoulder 130, barrel 140, and base 150, including their structural components, may be further varied. The thickness profile of the bottle 100 is listed in Table 2 below. Similar to the bottle 10, the bottle 100 features gradual downward thickening from the intermediate section 142 of the barrel 140 to the central region 154 of the base 150 (from about 0.18 mm to about 1.00 mm). Unlike the bottle 10, however, no gradual upward thickening is featured in the bottle 100. Instead, the upper section 131 of the shoulder 130 is relatively thinner than the rest of the shoulder (combination of 132 and 133). In this exemplary embodiment, for example, the thickness of the intermediate and lower sections (132, 133) of the shoulder 130, i.e. (0.18+0.24)/2=0.21 mm, is at least 1.10 times the thickness of the upper section 131 of the shoulder 130.
The top loading resistance of the bottle 100 is illustrated in
Turning now to
The shoulder 230 includes an upper section 231 connected to the mouth 220, an intermediate section 232, and a lower section 233 connected to the barrel 240. The intermediate section 232 may include a diagonal surface groove 234. The surface groove 234 may have an upper portion 235 connected to a lower portion 236. Similar to the bottle 100 illustrated in
The barrel 240 includes an upper section 241 connected to the shoulder 230, an intermediate section 242, and a lower section 243 connected to the base 250. The upper and intermediate sections (241, 242) of the barrel 240 may each include one or more ribs 244. The ribs 244 may be horizontal and evenly spaced apart. The base 250 includes a sidewall 251 connected to a bottom wall 252. The bottom wall 252 may be convex and include a peripheral region 253 and a central region 254. As illustrated in
The thickness profile of the bottle 200 is listed in Table 3 below. The upper section 231 of the shoulder 230 is relatively thinner than the rest of the shoulder (combination of 232 and 233). Moreover, the upper section 231 is relatively thinner than the intermediate section 232, which in turn is relatively thicker than the lower section 233. In particular, the thickness of the intermediate section 232 is about (0.33+0.26)/2=0.295 mm, which is at least 1.5 times the thickness of the upper section (about 0.19 mm) Unlike the bottle 100, however, the lower section 243 of the barrel 240 is relatively thinner than the rest of the barrel (combination of 241 and 242). Moreover, the lower section 243 is relatively thinner than the intermediate section 242, which in turn is relatively thicker than the upper section 241. As a result, the intermediate sections (232, 242) of both the shoulder 230 and the barrel 240 are strengthened in bottle 200.
The top loading resistance of the bottle 200 is illustrated in
The bottle disclosed herein may be made of thermoplastic materials such as polyolefins or polyesters. For example, the bottle may be made of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, or the like. However, other polymeric materials, inorganic materials, metallic materials, or composites or laminates thereof may also be used. Further, the materials used in the disclosed bottles may be natural or synthetic. It is to be noted that the exemplary bottles described above all have an essentially identical weight (e.g. about 25.00 g). As a result, the improvement in top loading resistance, such as a higher crushing load and/or a lower crushing deformation, can be achieved without using more material or adding substantial weight to the bottle.
While only certain exemplary embodiments have been set forth, alternative embodiments and various modifications will be apparent from the above descriptions to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4755404 | Collette | Jul 1988 | A |
4877142 | Doering | Oct 1989 | A |
4949861 | Cochran | Aug 1990 | A |
5066528 | Krishnakumar et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5217128 | Stenger | Jun 1993 | A |
5281387 | Collette et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5407086 | Ota et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5520877 | Collette et al. | May 1996 | A |
5614148 | Beck et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5735420 | Nakamaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5803290 | Bongiorno | Sep 1998 | A |
5829614 | Collette et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5908127 | Weick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918753 | Ogg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
D414700 | Zogg | Oct 1999 | S |
6095360 | Shmagin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6161713 | Krich | Dec 2000 | A |
6164474 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6247606 | Zogg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6296131 | Rashid | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6349838 | Saito et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6372318 | Collette et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398052 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6431401 | Giblin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464106 | Giblin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6585123 | Pedmo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6662960 | Hong et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695162 | Boukobza et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6763969 | Melrose et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6841262 | Beck et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6923334 | Melrose et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964347 | Miura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7051890 | Onoda et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7108146 | Itokawa et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7198165 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7228981 | Chisholm | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7445826 | Collette et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7481326 | Itokawa et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7798349 | Maczek et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8091720 | Colloud | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8113370 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010037992 | Tanabe et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020084283 | Giblin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020166837 | Gonzalez | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060138074 | Melrose | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060191860 | Eisenbarth | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060255005 | Melrose et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070068894 | Iwashita et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070114200 | Lane | May 2007 | A1 |
20070199915 | Denner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080011702 | Walsh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080047964 | Denner et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080149588 | Nemoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090065468 | Hata et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090266782 | Lane | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090321384 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100012617 | Ulibarri et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100206837 | Deemer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120024813 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120175338 | Castillo Higareda et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 751 071 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2011116456 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO 2004028910 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005123517 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2010/001112 International Search Report dated Oct. 5, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120000882 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |