Bottom hole assemblies for directional drilling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11255136
  • Patent Number
    11,255,136
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 9, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 22, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Directional drilling is an extremely important area of technology for the extraction of oil and gas from earthen formations. The technology of the present application relates to improved positioning elements for directional drilling assemblies. It also relates to drilling directional wellbores using the guidance positioning members of the present technology.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The technology of the present application relates to improved bottom hole assemblies for directional drilling.


BACKGROUND

In the art of oil and gas well drilling, several methods exist to deviate the path of the wellbore off of vertical to achieve a target distanced from directly below the drilling rig. The methods used include traditional whipstocks, side jetting bits, modern Rotary Steerable Systems (RSS), adjustable gauge stabilizers, eccentric assemblies, turbines run in conjunction with a bent sub, and the most employed method, the bent housing Positive Displacement Motor (PDM). Variations, combinations, and hybrids exist for all of the methods listed.


The popularity of the bent housing PDM arises from its relatively low cost, general availability, familiarity to drillers, and known level of reliability. The bent housing PDM has a number of drawbacks, some of which are further described below.


A typical bent housing PDM assembly generally is made up from four primary sections. At the top is a hydraulic bypass valve called a dump sub. Frequently, the dump sub is augmented by a rotor catch mechanism designed to allow the components of the PDM to be retrieved if the outer housing fails and parts below the rotor catch. Next is the power section which is a housing containing a stator section with a lobed and spiraled central passage. A lobed and spiraled rotor shaft is deployed through the center of the power section and, in use, is caused to rotate as a result of the pressure exerted by drilling fluid pushed down through the power section. Below the power section, the PDM is fitted with a transmission and a transmission housing that incorporates a prescribed bend angle, typically 0.5 to 4.0 degrees, tilted off of the centerline of the assemblies above. The side opposite the bend angle is typically marked with a scribe and is referred to as the scribe side of the tool. It is this bend angle that primarily defines the amount of theoretical course alteration capability of the PDM steerable system. The course alteration capability of a given assembly is referred to as its “build rate” and is typically measured in calculated degrees of course change per 100 feet of drilled hole. The resulting curve of the borehole is sometimes referred to as Dog Leg Severity (DLS).


Below the transmission housing is the bearing assembly incorporating, among other things, thrust bearings, radial bearings, and a mandrel. The bearing assembly supports both axial and radial loads from above and from the bit which is typically threaded into a connection on the distal end of the bearing assembly. It should be noted that the traditional API connection of the bit to the bearing assembly comprises a considerable length which is generally deemed problematic to achieving targeted build rate.


The outer diameter of the bearing assembly is frequently mounted with a near bit stabilizer to keep the lower part of the assembly centered in the hole. A pad, typically referred to as a wear pad or kick pad, is frequently deployed at or near the outer side of the bend angle of the transmission housing. In many instances, an additional stabilizer is mounted at or near the proximate end of the power section. The stabilizer or stabilizers are typically ⅛″ to ½″ undersized in diameter compared to the nominal drill bit diameter and are typically concentric with the outer diameter of the component to which they are mounted. The stabilizers are undersized, in large part, to mitigate the risk of getting stuck in the hole which would be more likely with a stabilizer at full gauge, that is, as large in diameter as the drill bit.


The theoretical build rate of a bent housing motor assembly in slide mode (described further below) is traditionally determined by a “three point curvature” calculation where nominally the centerline of the bit face is the first point, the centerline of the tool at the bend/kick pad, or the midpoint of the near bit stabilizer is the second point, and the centerline of the motor top or the midpoint of the motor top stabilizer is the third point. These points work in unison to provide the fulcrum to drive the bit in the desired direction. The distance from the bit face/gauge intersection to the bend/kick pad is an aspect of the calculation. A goal of directional PDM design has been to reduce this distance because doing so theoretically enables the system to build angle at a higher rate for a given bend angle. It is important to note that three point calculations are performed on the outer bend side of the assembly, nominally operating on the “low side” of the hole or through the centerlines/midpoints as noted above. Traditional three point calculations do not take into account tool interaction with and resultant stresses engendered by contact, or over contact with the “high side” of the hole on the scribe side of the assembly.


To summarize, typical prior art PDM directional assembly types fall into three general categories. First is the slick assembly, which includes a kick/wear pad adjacent to the bend, and may include a stabilizer at the proximal end of the power section housing or on the dump sub/rotor catch assembly. The second type is the near bit stabilizer assembly which employs an under gauge stabilizer on the distal region of the bearing assembly, along with a kick/wear pad adjacent to the bend. Similarly, this second type of assembly may additionally carry a stabilizer at the proximal end of the motor housing or on the dump sub/rotor catch assembly. The third type is referred to as a “packed hole” assembly and includes, in addition to a near bit stabilizer, an additional under gauge stabilizer typically at the proximal end of the transmission housing. As with the other two types, an optional, additional under gauge stabilizer may be mounted on the proximal end of the motor housing or on the dump sub/rotor catch assembly.


The directional driller employing a bent housing PDM directs the rig to rotate the drill string including the bottom hole assembly when he feels, based on surveys or measurement information while drilling, that the well trajectory is on plan. This is called rotary mode. It produces a relatively “straight” wellbore section. It should be noted that throughout this application, where a rotary drilled section is referred to as generally straight, that the description includes sections that are not absolutely straight, because rotary drilled sections may, for example, build, drop, dip, or walk. The rotary drilled wellbore sections are generally straight in relation to the curved sections made in slide mode drilling.


When the directional surveys indicate that the well path is not proceeding at the correct inclination or azimuthal direction, the directional driller makes a correction run. He has the assembly lifted off bottom and then slowly rotated until an alignment mark at surface indicates to him that the bend angle has the bit aimed correctly for the correction run. The rotary table is then locked so that the drill string remains in a position where the bend angle (tool face) is aimed in the direction needed to correct the trajectory of the well path. As drilling fluid is pumped through the drill string, the rotor of the power section turns and rotates the drill bit. The weight on the bottom hole assembly pushes the drill bit forward along the directed path. The drill string slides along behind the bit. This is called “sliding” mode and is the steering component of the well drilling process. Once the directional driller calculates that an adequate course change has been made, he will direct the rig to resume rotating the drill string to drill ahead on the new path.


Reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 4,729,438 to Walker et al. which describes the directional drilling process utilizing a bent housing PDM, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if set out in full.


The efficiency, predictability, and performance of bent housing PDM assemblies are negatively impacted by a number of factors. As noted by Walker et al., the components of a steerable PDM can hang-up in the borehole when the change is made from rotary mode to slide drilling. This can happen as the assembly is lifted for orientation and again when the assembly is slid forward in sliding mode with the rotary locked. The hang-up can require the application of excess weight to the assembly risking damage when the hang-up is overcome and the assembly strikes the hole bottom. The hang-up condition can occur not only at the location of the stabilizing members attached to the PDM, but also at the location of any of the string stabilizers above the motor as they pass through curved sections of wellbore.


When rotation of the drill string is stopped to drill ahead in sliding mode, the directional driller needs to be confident that the bend in the PDM has the bit pointed in the proper direction. This is known as “tool face orientation”. To make an efficient course change, the tool face orientation needs to be known so the assembly can be aimed in the desired direction, otherwise the resultant section of drilling may be significantly off of the desired course. The directional driller's ability to know the tool face orientation is negatively impacted by torque and drag that result from over engagement of the drill string, and especially the stabilizers, with the borehole wall during slide mode. It also can be altered by excess weight being applied to push the assembly ahead when it is hung up. When the assembly breaks free, the bit face can be overly engaged with the rock face, over torqueing the system, and altering the tool face orientation.


Correction runs made at an improper tool face orientation take the well path further off course, requiring additional correction runs and increasing the total well bore tortuosity adding to torque and drag.


These problems are exacerbated in assemblies that use a high bend angle. Creating a well bore with a higher amount of DLS increases the amount of torque and drag acting on the drill string and bottom hole assembly. A highly tortuous well bore brings the stabilizers into even greater contact and over engagement with the borehole wall.


It is also frequently found that the amount of curvature actually achieved in slide mode by an assembly with a given bend angle is less than was predicted by the three point calculation. This causes drillers to select even higher bend angles to try to achieve a targeted build rate. Directional drillers may also select a higher bend angle in order to reduce the distance required to make a course correction allowing for longer high penetration rate rotary mode drilling sections. This overcompensation in build approach increases the overall average penetration rate while drilling the well but it also produces a problematic, excessively tortuous wellbore.


Higher bend angles put increased stress on the outer periphery of the drill bit, on the motor's bearing package, on the rotor and stator inside the motor, on the transmission housing, and on the motor housing itself. This increased stress increases the occurrence of component failures downhole. The connections between the various housings of the PDM are especially vulnerable to failures brought on by high levels of flexing and stress.


For these and additional reasons which will become apparent, a better approach to PDM geometry and configuration is needed. The present invention sets out improved technology to overcome many of the deficiencies of the prior art.


Reference is made to IADC/SPE 151248 “Directional Drilling Tests in Concrete Blocks Yield Precise Measurements of Borehole Position and Quality”. In these tests, it was found that a PDM assembly with a 1.41° bend produced a 20 mm to 40 mm “lip” on the low side of the hole when transition was made from rotary to slide mode drilling in a pure build (0° scribe) section. A comparable disconformity was created on the high side of the hole in the transition from rotary to slide mode drilling with the assembly oriented in slide down. These lips can account for some of the “hang-up” experienced in these transitions. IADC/SPE 151248 is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


Reference is also made to the proposed use of eccentric stabilizers in directional drilling, either in non-rotating configurations, or on steerable PDMs as a biasing means, alone or in conjunction and alignment with a bent housing. A specific reference in this area of art is the aforementioned Walker reference. Additional references include U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,919,897; 3,561,549; and 4,465,147 all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.


Reference is also made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/430,254, filed Feb. 10, 2017, titled “Drilling Machine”, which is incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full, which describes, among other things, a Cutter Integrated Mandrel (CIM). The CIM technology may be advantageously employed in connection with the current technology. In addition, the Dynamic Lateral Pad (DLP) technology of the referenced application may also be advantageously employed in connection with the current technology. The “Drilling Machine” application is assigned to the same assignee as the current application and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The bottom hole assembly technologies of the present application can also be mounted on adjustable diameter mechanisms such as are used on Adjustable Gauge Stabilizers, as are known in the art. A non-limiting example is U.S. Pat. No. 4,848,490 to Anderson which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.


SUMMARY

The technology of the present application discloses new bent housing PDM directional drilling assemblies operating in and interacting with curved and generally straight hole wellbores. Employing these technologies allows for the creation of novel assembly positioning elements that can replace or modify traditional near bit stabilizer and upper stabilizer components on a directional PDM assembly. The technology of the present application is based on the newly modeled observation that traditional 3 point calculations and BHA modeling fail to take into account the complete set of geometries of a steerable system operating in a curved well bore. These novel assemblies provide the needed support for the steering fulcrum effect while minimizing the production of torque, drag, and hang-up such as is attendant in the prior art.


The technology of the present application consistently employs a positioning element proximal of the bend generally on the upper (proximal) end of the transmission housing. This positioning element incorporates a primary outer positioning surface or surfaces on the scribe side of the tool and may include raised secondary surfaces on the bend side of the tool. Both the primary outer positioning surface or surfaces and the secondary surfaces, if any share the centerline of the tool, are circumferentially deployed. The most extended primary outer positioning surfaces are radially distanced from the tool centerline by a factor greater than or equal to 0.91 and less than or equal to 1.05 of the nominal bit radius of the assembly. The outer surfaces of the secondary surfaces are radially distanced from the tool centerline by a factor of less than or equal to 0.90 of the nominal bit radius of the assembly, but no less than the radius of the tool housing.


For instance, on an assembly with an 8.750 inch diameter (4.375 radius) bit and a 7.000 inch diameter (3.500 radius) transmission housing, the outer surfaces of the primary positioning zone would lie on an arc distanced from the centerline of the tool by a value of between 3.981 inch and 4.593 inch. The outer surface or surfaces of the secondary zone would lie on an arc distanced from the centerline of the tool by a value of between 3.500 (no blade extension, just the housing outer surface) and 3.937 inch. Generally, the closer the primary positioning surfaces are to the minimum value, in this case 3.981 inch, the closer the secondary positioning surfaces will be to the minimum value for the secondary positioning zone, in this case 3.500 inch.


Where the technology of the present application also includes a near bit positioning element, said element would typically be sleeve mounted distal of the bend typically on the bearing housing. On a near bit positioning element, the outer primary surfaces of the positioning element are on the bend side of the directional drilling assembly and the secondary surfaces, if any, are on the scribe side of the assembly. On an exemplary assembly with an 8.750 drill bit diameter, the radial values for the primary outer surfaces are in the same range as previously noted, between 3.981 inch and 4.593 inch. In this example, the sleeve body diameter is 7.500 inch yielding a secondary zone value between 3.75 inch radius (no blade extension) and 3.937 inch (0.90 of nominal bit radius).


An observation in the development of the technologies of the present application is that rather than simply looking at a presumed set of contact points for a three point calculation, a modeling of the axial centerline of the bottom hole assembly housings in a BHA with a given bend angle and under the loads of slide mode drilling better informs the design and deployment of outer BHA elements to achieve the desired build rate. Traditional 3 point calculations have left system designers and directional drillers questioning why directional drilling assemblies have failed to deliver the predicted build rate or failed to deliver a consistent build rate. An additional critical observation made by the applicants of the present application is that when a traditional bent housing bottom hole assembly has made a slide section and is returned to rotary drilling mode, the contact loads on the proximal surfaces of the distal (near bit) stabilizer are exceedingly high. These loads can be greater than 65,000 lbs. during the course of the first or first several rotations of the assembly. The pads of the subject near bit stabilizer see the highest stresses at the top side of the bore hole as the bend side of the assembly is rotated around and the bend side pads strike the top borehole surface.


These forces are great enough to bring about tool failure through shock or fatigue loading. The contact loads experienced by the near bit stabilizer are translated into bending loads in the motor housing and assembly connections. In order to address the deficiencies of prior art bottom hole directional assemblies discussed above, the developers of the technology of the present application have created a series of alternative bottom hole assembly designs. The primary goal of these technologies is to provide bottom hole assembly elements which maintain the centerline of the assembly at or near the bend angle at or below the hole centerline position. In some embodiments, the technologies of the present application additionally address the high contact loads experienced by the near bit stabilizer in the transition from slide to rotary mode drilling. At discretion of the system designer, additionally polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) or tungsten carbide cutters may be deployed on the distal surfaces of the assembly elements. These cutters may be deployed in any orientation as is known in the art, to cut in shear in rotary mode, or to plow in sliding mode. The purpose of these cutters is to better enable the assembly elements to address transiting the transition lips identified in IADC/SPE 151248 referenced above. Although PDC or tungsten carbide cutters have been noted here, any suitable cutting element known in the art may be deployed for this purpose.


The system designer can choose the number of flutes, if any, and method of wear protection of the assembly elements. The system designer can choose whether to use straight or spiraled blades on his positioning assemblies.


The system designer may produce computer machining files needed to machine or fabricate by subtractive or additive manufacturing techniques the assembly elements that will be deployed on the Bottom Hole Assembly. This description is not meant to limit the manufacturing techniques that may be chosen to create the bottom hole assemblies of the application. Any manufacturing method, including welding, grinding, turning, milling, or casting or any other method known in the art may be used.


The development of the above design method was made by the inventors of the present technology observing that traditional near gauge stabilizers unnaturally force the assembly towards the center of the hole. This unnatural positioning of the drilling assembly causes the assembly to disadvantageously push the prior art stabilizers into over engagement with the bore hole wall, damaging and enlarging the wall and creating accelerated wear on the stabilizers. By forcing the assembly into an unnatural position, increased stress and load is placed on the housings of the assembly increasing the likelihood of fatigue failure. It also adds significantly to the problems of drag in sliding mode and torque and drag in rotary mode.


Another observation made during the development of this technology is that in at least some, and potentially many, instances additional contact occurs on the high side (scribe side) of the assembly in slide mode. It has been observed that this high side contact can move during the slide due to deflection and may occur at various times from the upper end of the transmission housing to points all up and down the motor housing. These shifting high side contact points can dramatically and unpredictably alter the build characteristics of the assembly. To address this condition, the system designer employing the technology of the present application will place an assembly positioning element on the high side of the assembly proximal of the bend to increase the likelihood of the high side contact being limited to a single, predictable and calculable point.


The technology is also applicable to combined RSS Motor systems.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to create smoother wellbores. This includes smoother build sections and less tortuous horizontal sections.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to improve the effectiveness of bend elements in directional PDM assemblies, allowing for the use of less aggressive bend angles to achieve a given build rate. Using a less aggressive bend angle reduces the amount of hole oversize created in the rotate drilling mode, reducing operational costs. Using a less aggressive bend angle reduces the loads and stresses on the outer periphery of drill bits used in directional drilling PDM assemblies, improving the life and performance of the bits. Employing the current technology with the Cutter Integrated Mandrel technology referred to above allows for even less aggressive bend angles for a given build rate.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to produce directional wellbores requiring fewer correction runs.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to reduce torque and drag generated by the interaction of a directional PDM assembly with the wellbore.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to allow for longer lateral sections to be drilled through the reduction in tortuosity, torque, and drag resulting from the use of the technology.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to increase the flow path for drilling fluid and cuttings past the outer members of a directional PDM assembly.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to increase the rate of penetration in drilling operations utilizing directional PDM assemblies. This is accomplished by increasing the ratio of rotary drilling mode to sliding drilling mode and by making the drilling occurring in rotary mode and, especially in slide drilling mode, more effective.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to improve the predictability and certainty of tool face orientation reducing the number and length of correction runs required for a given directional well.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to reduce the amount of stress, deflection, and load placed on the various components of a directional drilling PDM assembly.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to reduce the wear rate on bits used on directional drilling assemblies by allowing for less aggressive bend angles.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to provide appropriate support, and fulcrum effect to a directional drilling PDM assembly rather than detrimental centralization or stabilization of the prior art.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to reduce in size and more effectively transit the transition lips existing in directional wellbores at the transition from rotary to slide mode drilling and from slide mode to rotary drilling.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to allow for even higher build rates than traditional directional drilling PDM assemblies.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to provide improved performance of Rotary Steerable Systems that utilize PDM motors.


It is an object of the technology of the present application to provide positioning BHA elements that can replace traditional stabilizers utilized on other BHA components or on drill string.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a side view of a prior art slick assembly steerable PDM directional assembly.



FIG. 1a shows a cross section view of the kick/wear pad of the prior art assembly of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2 shows a side view of a prior art near bit partially stabilized steerable PDM directional assembly.



FIG. 2a shows a cross section view of the kick/wear pad of the prior art assembly of FIG. 2.



FIG. 2b shows a cross section view of the near bit stabilizer of the prior art assembly of FIG. 2.



FIG. 3 shows a side view of a prior art fully stabilized steerable PDM directional assembly.



FIG. 3a shows a cross section view of the kick/wear pad of the prior art assembly of FIG. 3.



FIG. 3b shows a cross section view of the near bit stabilizer of the prior art assembly of FIG. 3.



FIG. 3c shows a cross section view of the upper stabilizer of the prior art assembly of FIG. 3.



FIG. 4 shows a generalized cross section view of aspects of the technology of the steerable PDM directional assembly of this application.



FIG. 5 shows a side view of an embodiment of a modified steerable PDM directional assembly consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 5a shows a cross section view of the near bend kick/wear pad of FIG. 5.



FIG. 5d shows a cross section view of a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 6 shows a side view of an alternative embodiment of a modified steerable PDM directional assembly consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 6a shows a cross section view of the near bend kick/wear pad of FIG. 6.



FIG. 6e shows a cross section view of an alternative embodiment of a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 7 is a side view of a modified steerable PDM directional assembly incorporating both a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element and a bend side enlarged primary structure radius lower sleeve positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 7a shows a cross section view of the near bend kick/wear pad of FIG. 7.



FIG. 7d shows a cross section view of an embodiment of a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 7f shows a cross section view of a bend side enlarged primary structure radius lower sleeve element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 8 shows a side view of a modified steerable PDM directional assembly incorporating both a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element and a bend side enlarged primary structure radius lower sleeve positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 8a shows a cross section view of the near bend kick/wear pad of FIG. 8.



FIG. 8e shows a cross section view of an alternative embodiment of a scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 8g shows a cross section view of an alternative embodiment of a bend side enlarged primary structure radius lower sleeve element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 9i shows a side view of a modified steerable PDM directional assembly incorporating a spiraled blade scribe side above bend primary structure radius positioning element and a bend side primary structure radius lower sleeve positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 9j shows a scribe side view of the modified steerable PDM directional assembly of FIG. 9i.



FIG. 9a shows a cross section view of the near bend kick/wear pad of FIG. 9i.



FIG. 9g shows a cross section view of an alternative embodiment of a bend side enlarged primary structure radius lower sleeve element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 9h shows a cross section view of an alternative embodiment of a spiraled scribe side above bend enlarged primary structure radius positioning element consistent with the technology of the present application.



FIG. 10a shows a cross section of an alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology.



FIG. 10b shows a cross section of an additional alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology.



FIG. 10c shows a cross section of an additional alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology.



FIG. 11 is a chart of calculated build rates (BUR) for various assembly bend angles of assemblies employing the technology of the present application.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows a side view of a prior art slick assembly steerable PDM directional assembly 100. Assembly 100 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103.



FIG. 1a shows a cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2 shows a side view of a prior art near bit stabilized steerable PDM directional assembly 200. Assembly 200 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. It also includes near bit stabilizer 205.



FIG. 2a shows a cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 2.



FIG. 2b shows a cross section 206 of near bit stabilizer 205 taken across b-b of FIG. 2 with symmetric circumferential blades shown at 207.



FIG. 3 shows a side view of a prior art fully stabilized steerable PDM directional assembly 300. Assembly 300 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. It also includes near bit stabilizer 205 and above bend stabilizer 308.



FIG. 3a shows a cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 3.



FIG. 3b shows a cross section 206 of near bit stabilizer 205 taken across b-b of FIG. 3 with symmetric circumferential blades shown at 207.



FIG. 3c shows a cross section 309 of above bend stabilizer 308 taken across c-c of FIG. 3 with symmetric circumferential blades shown at 310.



FIG. 4 shows a generalized cross section view 400 of aspects of the technology of the steerable PDM directional assembly of this application. FIG. 4 shows center point 490, nominal bit diameter 491, housing or sleeve minor diameter 492, nominal bit radius 493, and nominal housing or sleeve minor radius 494. FIG. 4 also shows demarcation diameter 495. Radial zone 496 falls inside the demarcation diameter 495 and covers the zone of maximum radial surface of a secondary positioning element structure of a given near bit or above bend positioning element. In the technology of the present application, radial zone 496 is greater than or equal to the housing or sleeve minor diameter 492 and is less than or equal to 0.90 of the nominal bit radius 493. Radial zone 497 falls outside the demarcation diameter 495 and covers the zone of maximum radial surface of a primary positioning element structure of a given near bit or above bend positioning element. In the technology of the present application, radial zone 497 is greater than or equal to 0.91 of the nominal bit radius 493 and less than or equal to 1.05 of the nominal bit radius 493. From the above description, it can be seen that the demarcation diameter 495 occupies the narrow zone between 0.90 and 0.91 of the nominal bit radius 493.



FIG. 5 shows a side view of an assembly 500 consistent with one embodiment of the technology of the present application. Assembly 500 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. It also shows above bend positioning element 509.



FIG. 5a shows cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 5.



FIG. 5d shows cross section 510 of above bend positioning element 509 taken across d-d of FIG. 5. FIG. 5d also shows primary positioning element structure 511.



FIG. 6 shows a side view of an assembly 600 consistent with another embodiment of the technology of the present application. Assembly 600 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. Assembly 600 also shows above bend positioning element 609.



FIG. 6a shows cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 6.



FIG. 6e shows cross section 610 of above bend positioning element 609 taken across e-e of FIG. 6. FIG. 6e also shows primary positioning element structure blades 611.



FIG. 7 shows a side view of an assembly 700 consistent with another embodiment of the technology of the present application. Assembly 700 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. Assembly 700 also shows above bend positioning element 509. Assembly 700 also shows near bit positioning element 715. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 7.



FIG. 7a shows cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 7. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 7.



FIG. 7d shows cross section 510 of above bend positioning element 509 taken across d-d of FIG. 7. FIG. 7d also shows primary positioning element structure 511.



FIG. 7f shows cross section 716 of near bit positioning element 715 taken across f-f of FIG. 7. FIG. 7f also shows primary positioning element structure 717.



FIG. 8 shows a side view of an assembly 800 consistent with another embodiment of the technology of the present application. Assembly 800 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. Assembly 800 also shows above bend positioning element 609. Assembly 800 also shows near bit positioning element 817. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 8.



FIG. 8a shows cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 8. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 8.



FIG. 8e shows cross section 610 of above bend positioning element 609 taken across e-e of FIG. 8. FIG. 8e also shows primary positioning element structure blades 611.



FIG. 8g shows cross section 818 of near bit positioning element 817 taken across g-g of FIG. 8. FIG. 8g also shows primary positioning element structure blades 819.



FIG. 9i shows a side view of an assembly 900 consistent with another embodiment of the technology of the present application. Assembly 900 includes bend 101, drill bit 102, and kick/wear pad 103. Assembly 900 also shows above bend positioning element 919. Assembly 900 also shows near bit positioning element 715. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 8.



FIG. 9a shows cross section 104 of kick/wear pad 103 taken across a-a of FIG. 9i. It should be noted that kick/wear pad 103 is optional at designer discretion in the embodiment of FIG. 9i.



FIG. 9g shows cross section 818 of near bit positioning element 817 taken across g-g of FIG. 9i. FIG. 9g also shows primary positioning element structure blades 819.



FIG. 9h shows cross section 920 of above bend positioning element 919. FIG. 9h also shows spiraled primary positioning element structure blades 921.



FIG. 9j shows a scribe side view of assembly 900. FIG. 9j also shows scribe side of above bend positioning element 919 and scribe mark 922.



FIG. 10a shows a cross section of an assembly 1000 of an alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology. Assembly 1000 includes two primary positioning element structure surfaces at 1001 and three secondary positioning element structure surfaces at 1002.



FIG. 10b shows a cross section of an assembly 1010 of an additional alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology. Assembly 1010 includes three primary positioning element structure surfaces at 1011 and two secondary positioning element structure surfaces at 1012.



FIG. 10c shows a cross section of an assembly 1020 of an additional alternative embodiment of a positioning element of the technology. Assembly 1010 includes one primary positioning element structure surface at 1021 and five secondary positioning element structure surfaces at 1022.


As can be seen from FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c, the degrees of arc of the outer surfaces of the primary element structure may cover as little as approximately 25 degrees as in 10c, or greater amounts of degrees of arc as in 10a and 10b. In the technology of this application, the maximum degrees of arc of the outer surfaces of the primary element structure does not exceed 175 degrees.



FIG. 11 is a chart of geometrically calculated build rates (BUR) for various assembly bend angles of assemblies employing the technology of the present application. In this example, a series of bend angles ranging from 1.25 degrees to 2.25 degrees are considered on an assembly with an exemplary nominal 8.750 bit diameter. A range of primary outer positioning element structure surfaces radial extensions are represented. These radial extensions range from just over 94% of the nominal bit radius to almost 103% of nominal bit radius. It can be seen that as the radial extension of the outer surfaces increase for a given bend angle, the BUR increases in degrees per 100 feet.


As can be seen from the detailed figures in applying the technology of this application, the designer is free to radius or bevel the edges of the outer surfaces of the positioning element structures. Additionally the designer may choose to bevel, taper or curve the proximal and/or distal ends of the outer surfaces of the positioning element structures to transition or blend them with the tool or sleeve body.


It should be additionally noted that the designer may taper the proximal portion of the primary outer surfaces of a near bit positioning element structure in order to reduce the stresses encountered in the slide to rotate stress condition referred to previously.


In applying the technology of this application, the designer may choose to not employ traditional kick/wear pad at or near the bend of the assembly. It should be understood that the use of traditional kick/wear pad is at the discretion of the designer.


As to manufacturing technique, it is also possible to create a modified bottom hole assembly according to the teachings of this application by selectively grinding or milling some of the outer surfaces of the blades of traditional directional BHA stabilizers to allow them to meet the limits of secondary outer positioning element structures while leaving the remaining blades unground or unmilled, or adding material to the remaining blades such as by welding, so as to cause them or allow them to meet the limits of primary outer positioning element structures. Additionally, flat top or dome top tungsten carbide or PDC inserts can be inserted into sockets formed in the primary outer positioning structure. These inserts can be placed for an exposure above the pad or surface of the positioning element primary structure to allow the structure to meet the limits of the primary outer surfaces of the technology.


Although the technology of the present application has been described with reference to specific embodiments, these descriptions are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of the disclosed embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments of the technology will become apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the technology. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and equivalent constructions as set forth in the appended claims. It is, therefore, contemplated that the claims will cover any such modifications or embodiments that fall within the scope of the technology.

Claims
  • 1. A downhole directional drilling apparatus configured to attach to a drill string, the apparatus comprising, a drill bit, the drill bit having a cutting structure;a bent housing positive displacement motor; anda positioning element mounted proximal a bend angle of the drilling apparatus, wherein the positioning element comprises a first fixed blade generally on a scribe side of the drilling apparatus having an outermost surface with a first fixed radius from an axial centerline of the drilling apparatus, the first fixed radius equal to a fixed value that is from 0.91 to 1.05 of a nominal radius of the drill bit, and the positioning element having a surface on the bend side of the drilling apparatus, the surface having a second fixed radius from the axial centerline, the second fixed radius having a fixed value that is less than 0.90 of the nominal radius of the drill bit and greater than a nominal radius of a housing of the drilling apparatus, wherein the first fixed blade is stationary relative to the axial centerline of the drilling apparatus.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a kick pad generally adjacent and above the bend angle of the drilling apparatus.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a distal positioning element mounted distal the bend angle of the drilling apparatus, wherein the distal positioning element comprises a distal fixed blade generally on the bend side of the drilling apparatus, the distal fixed blade having a distal fixed blade radius from the axial centerline of the drilling apparatus, and the distal positioning element comprising a distal surface generally on the scribe side of the drilling apparatus where the distal surface generally has a distal surface fixed radius that is less than the distal blade radius, wherein the distal fixed blade is stationary relative to the axial centerline of the drilling apparatus.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the positioning element includes at least one of a tapered transition or curved transition between the first fixed blade surface and the drilling apparatus.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein both the distal positioning element and the positioning element include tapered or curved transitions between the fixed blade surfaces and a tool body of the drilling apparatus.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein an outermost surface of the distal fixed blade generally on the bend side of the distal positioning element comprises the distal fixed radius from the axial centerline of the drilling apparatus equal to a fixed value that is from 0.91 to 1.05 of the nominal radius of the drill bit; and wherein the distal surface fixed radius of the distal surface generally on the scribe side of the distal positioning element comprises a fixed value that is less than 0.90 of the nominal radius of the drill bit.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the outermost surfaces of the distal fixed blades of the distal positioning element are relieved in a proximal direction.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the outermost surface of the distal fixed blades of the distal positioning element are tapered in a proximal direction.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the positioning element is circumferentially asymmetric.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the positioning element is axially asymmetric.
  • 11. A bent housing configured for attachment to a wellbore downhole assembly comprising: a bent housing positive displacement motor having a scribe side and a bend side wherein the bent housing comprises a bend angle;a positioning element mounted on the bent housing positive displacement motor proximal the bend angle, wherein the positioning element comprises a first fixed blade generally on the scribe side that has an outermost surface with a first fixed radius from an axial centerline of the bent housing positive displacement motor, and wherein the positioning element comprises a surface on the bend side that has a second fixed radius from the axial centerline, wherein the second fixed radius is less than the first fixed radius;a kick pad on the bent housing positive displacement motor, the kick pad positioned adjacent the bend angle; anda distal positioning element mounted distal the bend angle, wherein the distal positioning element comprises a distal fixed blade generally on the bend side, the distal fixed blade having a distal blade fixed radius from the axial centerline, and the distal positioning element having a distal surface generally on the scribe side, wherein the distal surface generally has a distal surface fixed radius that is less than the distal blade fixed radius;wherein the outermost surface of the first fixed blade generally on the scribe side of the positioning element comprises a fixed radius from the axial centerline of the assembly equal to a fixed value that is from 0.91 to 1.05 of a nominal radius of the drill bit;wherein the surface on the bend side of the positioning element comprises a fixed radius from the axial centerline of the tool having a fixed value that is less than 0.90 of the nominal radius of the drill bit; andwherein the outermost surface of the distal fixed blade generally on the bend side of the distal positioning element comprises the distal fixed radius from the axial centerline equal to a fixed value that is from 0.91 to 1.05 of the nominal radius of the drill bit wherein the distal surface fixed radius of the distal surface generally on the scribe side of the distal positioning element comprises a fixed value that is less than 0.90 of the nominal radius of the drill bit.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/439,843, filed Dec. 28, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein as if set out in full. The present application is a continuation in part of patent application Ser. No. 15/667,704 Method, Apparatus By Method, And Apparatus Of Guidance Positioning Members For Directional Drilling, filed Aug. 3, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein as if set out in full.

US Referenced Citations (171)
Number Name Date Kind
356154 William et al. Jan 1887 A
1638337 Hutton et al. Aug 1927 A
1667155 Higdon et al. Apr 1928 A
2919897 Sims et al. Jan 1960 A
3061025 Stockard et al. Oct 1962 A
3156310 Frisby Nov 1964 A
3159224 Cleary et al. Dec 1964 A
3224513 Weeden, Jr. et al. Dec 1965 A
3561549 Garrison Feb 1971 A
3880246 Farris Apr 1975 A
3882946 Ioannesian May 1975 A
4270619 Base et al. Jun 1981 A
4373592 Dellinger et al. Feb 1983 A
4385669 Knutsen et al. May 1983 A
4407377 Russell Oct 1983 A
4456080 Holbert et al. Jun 1984 A
4465147 Feenstra Aug 1984 A
4485879 Kamp et al. Dec 1984 A
4491187 Russell Jan 1985 A
4492276 Kamp et al. Jan 1985 A
4523652 Schuh et al. Jun 1985 A
4577701 Dellinger et al. Mar 1986 A
4618010 Falgout et al. Oct 1986 A
4623026 Kemp Nov 1986 A
4667751 Geczy et al. May 1987 A
4690229 Raney et al. Sep 1987 A
4697651 Dellinger Oct 1987 A
4715453 Falgout, Sr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4729438 Walker et al. Mar 1988 A
4739843 Burton Apr 1988 A
4775017 Forrest et al. Oct 1988 A
4807708 Forrest Feb 1989 A
4842083 Raney et al. Jun 1989 A
4848490 Anderson et al. Jul 1989 A
4862974 Warren et al. Sep 1989 A
4877092 Helm et al. Oct 1989 A
5010789 Brett et al. Apr 1991 A
5042596 Brett et al. Aug 1991 A
5050692 Beimgraben Sep 1991 A
5099929 Keith et al. Mar 1992 A
5099931 Krueger Mar 1992 A
5115872 Brunet et al. May 1992 A
5131479 Boulet Jul 1992 A
5139094 Prevedel et al. Aug 1992 A
5159577 Twist et al. Oct 1992 A
5181576 Askew et al. Jan 1993 A
5318137 Johnson Jun 1994 A
5320179 Roos et al. Jun 1994 A
5333699 Thigpen et al. Aug 1994 A
5343967 Kruger Sep 1994 A
5361859 Tibbitts et al. Nov 1994 A
5458208 Clarke Oct 1995 A
5673763 Thorp Oct 1997 A
5812068 Wisler Sep 1998 A
5857531 Estep et al. Jan 1999 A
5904213 Caraway et al. May 1999 A
5931239 Schuh Aug 1999 A
5937958 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Aug 1999 A
5957223 Doster et al. Sep 1999 A
5967246 Caraway et al. Oct 1999 A
5971085 Colebrook et al. Oct 1999 A
5979570 McLoughlin et al. Nov 1999 A
5992547 Caraway et al. Nov 1999 A
6073707 Noe et al. Jun 2000 A
6092613 Caraway et al. Jul 2000 A
6109372 Dorel et al. Aug 2000 A
6116356 Doster Sep 2000 A
6158533 Gillis et al. Dec 2000 A
6186251 Butcher et al. Feb 2001 B1
6213226 Eppink Apr 2001 B1
6257356 Wassell et al. Jul 2001 B1
6325162 Eppink Dec 2001 B1
6349780 Beuershausen et al. Feb 2002 B1
6427792 Roberts et al. Aug 2002 B1
6523623 Schuh et al. Feb 2003 B1
6722453 Crooks et al. Apr 2004 B1
6742605 Martini et al. Jun 2004 B2
6991046 Fielder et al. Jan 2006 B2
7207398 Runia et al. Apr 2007 B2
7562725 Broussard et al. Jul 2009 B1
7831419 Cariveau et al. Nov 2010 B2
8061453 Cariveau et al. Nov 2011 B2
8162081 Ballard et al. Apr 2012 B2
8176999 Stroud May 2012 B2
8201642 Radford et al. Jun 2012 B2
8210283 Benson et al. Jul 2012 B1
8240399 Kulkarni et al. Aug 2012 B2
8316968 Ferrari et al. Nov 2012 B2
8448721 Johnson et al. May 2013 B2
8448722 Konschuh et al. May 2013 B2
8550190 Hall et al. Oct 2013 B2
8757298 Broussard et al. Jun 2014 B2
8763726 Johnson et al. Jul 2014 B2
D710174 Moss Aug 2014 S
D710175 Moss et al. Aug 2014 S
D710176 Santamarina Aug 2014 S
D713706 Jing et al. Sep 2014 S
D717626 Dickrede Nov 2014 S
8905159 Downton Dec 2014 B2
9016400 Clausen et al. Apr 2015 B2
D731277 Manwaring et al. Jun 2015 S
D732364 Rinaldis et al. Jun 2015 S
9163460 Meier et al. Oct 2015 B2
9556683 Simmons et al. Jan 2017 B2
9605482 Lange et al. Mar 2017 B2
D786645 Svendsen et al. May 2017 S
D793831 Russell et al. Aug 2017 S
D793832 Russell et al. Aug 2017 S
D793833 Russell et al. Aug 2017 S
D813003 Chang Mar 2018 S
9963938 Foote et al. May 2018 B2
20020056574 Harvey May 2002 A1
20020070021 Van et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020112892 Taylor Aug 2002 A1
20020175006 Findley et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030010534 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024742 Swietlik et al. Feb 2003 A1
20040216921 Krueger Nov 2004 A1
20050096847 Huang May 2005 A1
20050150692 Ballantyne Jul 2005 A1
20050236187 Chen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060196697 Raney et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070007000 Dewey et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070163810 Underwood et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070205024 Mensa-Wilmot et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070235227 Kirkhope et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070272445 Cariveau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080000693 Hutton et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047754 Evans et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080053707 Martinez et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080075618 Martin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080115974 Johnson et al. May 2008 A1
20080190665 Earles et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080271923 Kusko et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090000823 Pirovolou Jan 2009 A1
20090044980 Sheppard et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044981 Sheppard et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090065262 Downton et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090107722 Chen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090188720 Johnson et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100006341 Downton Jan 2010 A1
20100307837 King et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110031025 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110247816 Carter Oct 2011 A1
20120055713 Herberg et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120234610 Azar et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130043076 Larronde Feb 2013 A1
20130180782 Ersan et al. Jul 2013 A1
20140097026 Clark et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140110178 Savage et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140246209 Themig et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140246234 Gillis et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140311801 Jain et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140379133 Toma Dec 2014 A1
20150101864 May Apr 2015 A1
20150122551 Chen May 2015 A1
20150152723 Hay Jun 2015 A1
20150322781 Pelletier et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160024846 Parkin Jan 2016 A1
20160024848 Desmette et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160115779 Moss et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160230465 Holtz Aug 2016 A1
20160265287 Newman et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160326863 Lange et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170044833 Foote Feb 2017 A1
20170130533 Ling May 2017 A1
20170234071 Spatz et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170241207 Meier Aug 2017 A1
20170342778 Chen Nov 2017 A1
20180073301 Russell et al. Mar 2018 A1
20190055810 Fripp et al. Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2291922 Jun 2000 CA
530045 Apr 1997 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
Kim et al. (“A Novel Steering Sections of Hybrid Rotary Steerable System for Directional Drilling”, ICCAS 2014, pp. 1617-1619) (Year: 2014).
Matheus et al. (“Hybrid Approach to Closed-loop Directional Drilling Control using Rotary Steerable Systems”, IFAC Workshop, 2012, pp. 84-89) (Year: 2012).
Warren et al. (“Casing Directional Drilling”, AADE 2005 National Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2005, pp. 1-10) (Year: 2005).
International Search Report and the Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/017515, dated Apr. 28, 2017, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US18/41316, dated Sep. 25, 2018, 14 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Patent Application PCT/US2017/066707, dated Apr. 6, 2018, 13 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Patent Application PCT/US2017/066745, dated Feb. 15, 2018, 9 pages.
Felczak, et al., “The Best of Both Worlds—A Hybrid Rotary Steerable System”, Oilfield Review; vol. 23, No. 4, Winter 2011, pp. 36-44.
Warren, et al., “Casing Directional Drilling”, AADE-05-NTCE-48; American Association of Drilling Engineers (AADE) 2005 National Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, Apr. 5-7, 2005, pp. 1-10.
APS Technology, “Rotary Steerable Motor for Directional Drilling.” downloaded Nov. 13, 2017 from http://www.aps-tech.com/products/drilling-systems/rotary-steerable-motor, 4 pages.
PetroWiki, “Direction deviation tools,” downloaded Nov. 13, 2017 from http://petrowiki.org/Directional_deviation_tools, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180179831 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62439843 Dec 2016 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15667704 Aug 2017 US
Child 15808798 US