Bottom structure for a plastic bottle

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9580206
  • Patent Number
    9,580,206
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 21, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 28, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
This invention relates to a base for a plastic bottle, especially for beverages under pressure, comprising an annular heel (6) which preferably is integral with the side wall (2) of the bottle, and a concave section (7) that is surrounded by, and integral with, the heel (6), wherein the concave section (7) comprises reinforcing elements arranged in a star pattern and increasing its rigidity, wherein the reinforcing elements are formed by convex areas (9) of the concave section (7) and the concave section (7) including the convex area (9) have essentially the same wall thickness.
Description

The invention relates to a base for a plastic bottle, especially for beverages under pressure, comprising an annular heel that is preferably integral with the side wall of the bottle, and a concave section that is surrounded by, and integral with, the heel, wherein the concave section comprises reinforcing elements arranged in a star pattern that increase its rigidity.


The invention further relates to a plastic bottle for beverages under pressure having a base whose annular heel is preferably integral with the side wall of the bottle.


A base of the type mentioned at the outset can be found, for example, in DE-OS 1801368.


Plastic bottles are only suitable for holding and storing beverages and the like under pressure if they meet specific design prerequisites. One of the main difficulties that arise when using plastic bottles for this stated purpose is that the center part of the base of the bottle tends to deflect or bulge outwardly beyond the rim of the base, creating positional instability of such bottles. It has become known to design the bottle base as a champagne bottle-type base or petaloid base. A champagne bottle-type base is curved inwardly and can therefore withstand a specific internal pressure without being deflected outwardly. The champagne bottle-type base is particularly common on glass bottles. Suitability of plastic bottles for beverages under pressure depends decisively on the wall thickness of the base. If the base wall is too thin, the bottle structure is too flexible, and excessive bulging of the bottle base cannot be prevented. If the base wall is too thick, material consumption and the manufacturing costs and weight of the bottle will be too high. Champagne bottle-type bases of the conventional type can no longer be used economically from a specific CO2 concentration of the beverage. A petaloid base comprises constrictions that extend up the side walls and between which curved, petal-shaped areas are formed. Petaloid bases are very common, especially in plastic bottles, and they withstand high internal pressure even if the base wall is relatively thin. Disadvantages are less positional stability and in particular the smaller static tipping angle, so that the risk that this bottle topples over is greater than for a comparable bottle with a champagne bottle-type base. The appearance of the bottle is also impaired by the petaloid areas that extend up to the side wall.


Various attempts have been made to improve the strength or rigidity of champagne bottle-type bases for use in plastic bottles. DE-OS 1801368, for example, proposes reinforcing ribs arranged in a star pattern in the concave bottle base, which however result in excessive material consumption since the reinforcing ribs are made of material added to the base, thereby also increasing the weight of the bottle. In addition, producing such a bottle base takes a much greater effort than producing a simple champagne bottle-type base.


It is the object of this invention to improve the base for a plastic bottle such that the bottle is suitable for storing beverages under high pressure while being lightweight and economical in material consumption. Manufacture should be easy, cost-efficient and automated with short cycle times. The bottle should also have an attractive and high-quality appearance; in particular, its base should not entail any restrictions in the design of the bottle.


This object is essentially achieved in a base of the type mentioned at the outset in that reinforcing elements are formed of convex areas of the concave section and in that the concave section, including the convex areas are essentially of a uniform wall thickness. The base starts from the shape of a champagne bottle-type base, and the invention proposes elements to rigidify the concave base section such that the material consumption is not or just negligibly higher than for a simple champagne bottle-type base. The stiffening elements provided according to the invention do not result in any material thickening since they are just formed from the convex areas of the concave base section. It was surprisingly found that such stiffening areas result in a very rigid structure even with very thin base walls, and even very high internal pressures of the bottle do not cause any outward deflection of the base.


Due to the base, the plastic bottle can be manufactured in a simple manner using conventional and proven methods. Especially bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are preferably manufactured from a so-called PET preform, an injection-molded preform. The process from a PET preform to a PET bottle runs through the following steps: The preform is initially heated up, that is, a temperature profile in accordance with the desired wall thickness distribution is introduced into the preform. Infrared radiant heaters may be used, for example. Then the preform is chucked in a three-piece mold, a thorn moves into the preform and stretches it to the final length of the bottle. Compressed air blows the tube produced in this way into its final shape, and then the bottle is brought to a temperature below the glass transition temperature by cooling the mold. Finally, the mold opens and the finished bottle is ejected.


The mold just has to be adapted in the base region to accomplish the base according to the invention, but the general process remains the same and no additional process steps are required. The concave section including the convex areas can easily be produced with an essentially uniform wall thickness using the manufacturing process described. “Essentially” means that the wall thickness may vary slightly due to the manufacturing process, e.g. when the material in the convex areas is stretched to a greater extent than the adjacent areas when the preform is pressed against the mold, such that the base may be slightly thinner in these areas.


The convex areas preferably have an oblong shape, i.e. their radial extension is greater than their circumferential extension. This results in a particularly stable base.


According to a preferred development of the invention, the convex areas are at a spacing from one another in the circumferential direction. The convex areas are evenly distributed, especially in the circumferential direction 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 such areas are conceivable depending on the diameter of the bottle.


In addition to reinforcing the concave base section, the convex areas can also serve as contact area of the bottle. For this purpose, it is preferably designed such that the convex areas include a section parallel to, or forming, a contact area. The section parallel to the contact area may, for example, comprise a bulge or the like protruding from the contact area.


Alternatively, or in addition to the contact area that is formed by the sections of convex stiffening areas mentioned, the bottle may also rest as usual on the heel of the base. In this case, the annular heel of the base comprises a contact area of the base. Thus the base of the bottle is in ground contact along the heel of the base like a conventional bottle with a champagne bottle-type base. This allows the consideration of aesthetic requirements and high-quality bottle design like with champagne bottles, where the side walls can extend to the base in free-form design, and no stiffening elements or the like are visible.


Good stiffening characteristics can be achieved if—according to a preferred development—the convex areas include curved sections in the lateral and inward radial directions adjacent to the section parallel to the contact area or forming a contact area.


The stability of the base can be further improved if the convex areas surround a central concave area.


Another improvement of the stability of the base can preferably be achieved in that the base comprises at least one annular groove, especially next to the heel or between the convex areas and the heel.


Yet another improvement of the stability of the base can preferably be achieved in that the base comprises at least one annular groove between the convex areas and the central concave area.


Yet another improvement of the stability of the base can preferably be achieved in that the base comprises an annular groove between the convex areas and the central concave area.


It is preferred that the convex areas comprise a radial extension that essentially corresponds to the radial distance between the heel and the central area, by which maximum stiffening is achieved.


As mentioned above, the base according to the invention is to be suitable for high internal pressures, wherein the internal pressure primarily depends on the CO2 content of the beverage. In one advantageous development, the base is designed to withstand an internal pressure of the bottle at a CO2 concentration of up to 5 g/L at a temperature of 20° C.


It is important that the walls are kept thin to achieve a cost-efficient and lightweight design consuming little material, however the wall thickness cannot be reduced arbitrarily for stability reasons. In a preferred embodiment in this respect the annular heel and/or the concave section has an average wall thickness equal to or smaller than 1.95 mm, preferably 1.5 mm, and the concave section does not exceed a wall thickness of 1.95 mm, preferably 1.5 mm, preferably 1 mm anywhere.





The invention is explained in more detail and with reference to the embodiment shown in diagrammatic view in the figure below.



FIG. 1 shows a lateral view of a plastic bottle,



FIG. 2 a bottom view of the bottle, and



FIG. 3 a sectional view along the III-III line in FIG. 2.






FIG. 1 shows a plastic bottle, especially a PET bottle 1 comprising a side wall 2 and a base 3 that is integral with the side wall 2. The bottleneck 4 has a male thread not shown in the figure onto which the screw cap 5 is screwed.



FIG. 2 shows a bottom view of the base 3. The base 3 comprises an annular heel 6 with which the bottle has contact with a support surface. An annular groove 8 is provided between the heel 6 and the concave section 7. The concave section 7 comprises outwardly domed, that is, convex areas 9, each of which comprising a section 10 parallel to the contact area, curves sections 11 laterally adjacent to the section 10 that is formed parallel to the contact area, and curves sections 12 radially adjacent to the section 10 that is formed parallel to the contact area. Another annular groove 14 is provided between the convex areas 9 and the central concave area 13.


The sectional view shown in FIG. 3 better shows the curvatures of each of the convex areas 9 and that the wall thickness or material thickness of the base 3 is essentially the same throughout.


The features of the invention disclosed in the above description, the claims and the figures can be relevant both individually and in combination for implementing the various embodiments of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A base for a plastic bottle for beverages under an internal pressure, the base comprising: an annular heel which is integral with a side wall of the bottle and comprises a first contact area; and,an inwardly domed section that is surrounded by and integral with said heel,the inwardly domed section includes a plurality of reinforcing elements arranged in a star pattern for increasing a rigidity of the inwardly domed section to enable the plastic bottle to withstand internal pressures,wherein the plurality of reinforcing elements are comprised of outwardly domed areas of the inwardly domed section that have a rigid structure so as to withstand the internal pressure and are configured to resist an outward deflection of the base,wherein the base comprises at least one annular groove between the outwardly domed areas and the heel,wherein the inner circumferential edge and the outer circumferential edge of said annular groove are located radially outwardly beyond the outwardly domed area,wherein the inwardly domed section including the outwardly domed areas have essentially the same wall thickness, andwherein the outwardly domed areas are arranged in a spacing from one another in the circumferential direction,wherein the outwardly domed areas include a section parallel to the first contact area:wherein the outwardly domed areas comprise curved sections in the lateral and inward radial directions adjacent to the section that is parallel to the first contact area and surround a central inwardly domed area, and the outwardly domed areas surround the central inwardly domed area, andwherein the base comprises at least one further annular groove between the outwardly domed areas and the central inwardly domed area.
  • 2. The base according to claim 1, wherein the base is designed to withstand an internal pressure of the bottle at a CO2 concentration of up to 5 g/L at a temperature of 20° C., said conditions according to the ideal gas law being equal to an internal pressure of approximately 2.73 atm (40.12 p.s.i.).
  • 3. The base according to claim 1, wherein the outwardly domed areas include a section forming a second contact area.
  • 4. A base for a plastic bottle for beverages under an internal pressure, the base comprising: an annular heel being integral with a side wall of the bottle and comprising a first contact area; and,an inwardly domed concave section that is surrounded by and integral with a heel, the inwardly domed concave section comprising a plurality of reinforcing elements arranged in a star pattern for increasing a rigidity of the base so as to be able to withstand internal pressure in the bottle,wherein the plurality of reinforcing elements are formed by outwardly domed convex areas of the inwardly domed concave section,wherein the inwardly domed concave section including the outwardly domed convex areas has essentially the same wall thickness,wherein the outwardly domed convex areas are arranged in a spacing from one another in the circumferential direction,wherein the outwardly domed convex areas include a section parallel to the first contact area, wherein the outwardly domed convex areas comprise curved sections in the lateral and inward radial directions adjacent to the section that is parallel to the first contact area,wherein the outwardly domed convex areas surround a central inwardly domed concave area,wherein the base comprises at least a first annular groove radially located between the outwardly domed convex areas and the heel, andwherein the base comprises at least a second annular groove located between the outwardly domed convex areas and the central inwardly domed concave area.
  • 5. The base according to claim 4, wherein an inner circumferential edge and an outer circumferential edge of said first annular groove are located radially outwardly beyond the outwardly domed area.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
A 1577/2010 Sep 2010 AT national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2011/004717 9/21/2011 WO 00 6/12/2013
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2012/038075 3/29/2012 WO A
US Referenced Citations (86)
Number Name Date Kind
3043461 Glassco Jul 1962 A
3137748 Makowski Jun 1964 A
3468443 Marcus Sep 1969 A
3643829 Lachner Feb 1972 A
3881621 Adomaitis May 1975 A
3934743 McChesney et al. Jan 1976 A
4108324 Krishnakumar et al. Aug 1978 A
4174782 Obsomer Nov 1979 A
4249666 Hubert et al. Feb 1981 A
4276987 Michel Jul 1981 A
4355728 Ota et al. Oct 1982 A
4465199 Aoki Aug 1984 A
4525401 Pocock et al. Jun 1985 A
4598831 Nakamura et al. Jul 1986 A
4863046 Collette et al. Sep 1989 A
4892205 Powers et al. Jan 1990 A
5005716 Eberle Apr 1991 A
D320154 Alberghini et al. Sep 1991 S
5205434 Brunson et al. Apr 1993 A
5320230 Hsiung Jun 1994 A
5492245 Kalkanis Feb 1996 A
5503283 Semersky Apr 1996 A
5553753 Abplanalp Sep 1996 A
5593063 Claydon et al. Jan 1997 A
5603423 Lynn et al. Feb 1997 A
5763030 Matsui Jun 1998 A
5780130 Hansen et al. Jul 1998 A
5785197 Slat Jul 1998 A
5829614 Collette et al. Nov 1998 A
5908128 Krishnakumar et al. Jun 1999 A
6045001 Seul Apr 2000 A
6065624 Steinke May 2000 A
D445033 Bretz et al. Jul 2001 S
6409035 Darr et al. Jun 2002 B1
6585123 Pedmo et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595380 Silvers Jul 2003 B2
6634517 Cheng et al. Oct 2003 B2
6769561 Futral et al. Aug 2004 B2
6896147 Trude May 2005 B2
6908002 Young et al. Jun 2005 B2
7051889 Boukobza May 2006 B2
7185525 Werth et al. Mar 2007 B2
7416089 Kraft et al. Aug 2008 B2
7461756 Pedmo et al. Dec 2008 B2
7543713 Trude et al. Jun 2009 B2
7556164 Tanaka Jul 2009 B2
D606410 Kissinger et al. Dec 2009 S
7780025 Simpson, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
D627652 Dorn Nov 2010 S
D630515 Bretz et al. Jan 2011 S
7861876 Stowitts Jan 2011 B2
D632576 Hermel Feb 2011 S
7891513 Mody et al. Feb 2011 B2
7891968 Lesueur Feb 2011 B2
7900425 Bysick et al. Mar 2011 B2
7963088 Simpson et al. Jun 2011 B2
8011919 Penet et al. Sep 2011 B2
D648220 Dorn Nov 2011 S
D651901 Miller et al. Jan 2012 S
8096434 Bunel et al. Jan 2012 B2
8152010 Melrose Apr 2012 B2
8245872 Hanot et al. Aug 2012 B2
8308006 Nievierowski et al. Nov 2012 B2
8424709 Boukobza Apr 2013 B2
8444002 Schneider et al. May 2013 B2
8529975 Trude et al. Sep 2013 B2
8584879 Melrose et al. Nov 2013 B2
8590729 Kamineni et al. Nov 2013 B2
8662332 Wurster et al. Mar 2014 B2
8726616 Bysick et al. May 2014 B2
8881937 Derrien Nov 2014 B2
20020063105 Darr et al. May 2002 A1
20040000533 Kamineni et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040195199 Maki et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050127024 Darr Jun 2005 A1
20050139571 Darr Jun 2005 A1
20060131257 Gatewood et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070231530 Pedmo et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080047964 Denner et al. Feb 2008 A1
20090159556 Patcheak et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090202766 Beuerle et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090242575 Kamineni et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100219152 Derrien et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110049083 Scott Mar 2011 A1
20110147392 Trude et al. Jun 2011 A1
20130001235 Patcheak et al. Jan 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
1801368 May 1969 DE
140792 May 1985 EP
237196 Sep 1987 EP
2034663 Jun 1980 GB
04-294735 Oct 1992 JP
2002-308245 Oct 2002 JP
2004-149157 May 2004 JP
2005-112361 Apr 2005 JP
2005-119742 May 2005 JP
2009-208813 Sep 2009 JP
2007060529 May 2007 WO
2009120988 Oct 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Hans de Grys, “Determining the Pressure inside an Unopened Carbonated Beverage”. Jul. 2007. Journal of Chemical Education. vol. 84 No. 7.
Ottmar Brandau, “How to Address Uneven Wall Thickness in Stretch-Blow Molding”, Plastics Technology, Dec. 2014, Accessed Jun. 8, 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130270214 A1 Oct 2013 US