Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6606951
-
Patent Number
6,606,951
-
Date Filed
Thursday, November 7, 200222 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, August 19, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Jordan; Charles T.
- Lofdahl; Jordon M
Agents
- Sachs; Michael C.
- Moran; John F.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 102 404
- 102 401
- 102 425
- 102 416
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine attacks and destroys multiple targets simultaneously at the targets” closest point of approach. This is accomplished by utilizing multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrators (EFPs) on a warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills horizontally in 360 degrees. The warhead comprises, for example, 16 curved copper or non-ferrous EFP metal plates arranged parallel to the central axis of the mine. The warhead is initiated either centrally or from either end, depending on the type of target being attacked.
Description
FEDERAL RESEARCH STATEMENT
[The inventions described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the U.S. Government for U.S. Government purposes.]
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
The invention relates in general to munitions and in particular to a bounding anti-tank/anti-vehicle mine.
With the exception of wide area mines, present anti-armor mines do not protect large areas. Wide area mines are comparatively expensive and not very reliable. In addition, present mines, only attack one target per mine. This problem has existed for 50 years. Present wide area mines do not produce catastrophic kills or firepower kills.
The old way to solve the problem was to plant a lot of antitank mines and hope that one of them would encounter a vehicle. This method involved a lot of mines which became a logistics problem and was very man-hour intensive.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
An important advantage of the present invention is that it can kill multiple armor and vehicle targets in 360 degrees over a wide area with one mine. This is accomplished by the use of a multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrator (EFP) warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills from a single warhead horizontally in 360 degrees. In addition, the firing train of the warhead can modify the output from the warhead to tailor it to the particular type of target of interest.
The invention will be better understood, and further objects, features, and advantages thereof will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.
FIGS. 1A-D
show the operational sequence of the mine according to the invention.
FIG. 2A
is a larger view of the mine in the position of
FIG. 1A
,
FIG. 2B
is a larger view of the mine in the position of FIG.
1
B and
FIG. 2C
is a larger view of the mine in the position of FIG.
1
C.
FIG. 3
is a view, partially in cross-section, of one embodiment of a mine according to the invention.
FIG. 4
is a perspective view of an exemplary warhead.
FIG. 5
is a top view of the warhead.
FIG. 6
is a side view of an explosively forged penetrator, after detonation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention is a bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine specifically designed to attack and destroy multiple targets simultaneously at the targets” closest point of approach. This is accomplished by utilizing multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrators (EFPs) on a warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills horizontally in 360 degrees. The warhead comprises, for example, 16 curved copper or non-ferrous EFP metal plates approximately 1.375″×10″ long arranged parallel to the central axis of the mine. The warhead contains, for example, approximately 29 pounds of PAX 3 explosive and is initiated either centrally or from either end, depending on the type of target being attacked.
When the warhead is initiated, the EFP metal plates fold into a clothespin shape that focuses all the energy of the explosive along a horizontal plane perpendicular to the central axis of the mine. This focusing of the explosive energy allows the EFP to punch through many inches of armor. The mine can be command controlled on-off-on with multiple remotely settable self-destruct times. The mine utilizes a three-axis magnetometer and an acoustic sensor to both detect, range gate, and classify a target. The mine waits for the closest point of approach of a given target and classifies the target as either light/medium or heavy. The warhead then bounds in the air three to four feet and detonates in a way that is appropriate for the target's classification. If the target is classified as an armor (i.e., heavy) target, the warhead will bound, detonate at its center and project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within 40 meters of the mine. If the target is classified as light/medium, the warhead will bound, detonate at one of its ends and fragment the EFPs, sending fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.
FIGS. 1A-D
show an example of the operational sequence of the mine
10
according to the invention. The bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine
10
may be, for example, deployed by hand, vehicle, air or missile. After impact of mine
10
on the ground
12
(FIG.
1
A), erection legs
14
(
FIG. 1B
) are released. The erection legs
14
erect the mine
10
in a vertical position. A radio command is sent to the mine
10
, arming the mine and setting its self-destruct time. Upon magnetic and acoustic detection of a vehicular target
16
(FIG.
1
C), the mine
10
waits for the closest point of approach and then, the bounding portion
18
bounds in the air three to four feet. A stationary portion
20
remains on the ground. The warhead then detonates (
FIG. 1D
) and sprays EFP fragments horizontally in 360 degrees penetrating the targets
16
and destroying them.
FIG. 2A
is a larger view of the mine
10
in the position of
FIG. 1A
(except oriented vertically rather than horizontally),
FIG. 2B
is a larger view of the mine
10
in the position of
FIG. 1B
, armed and erect, and
FIG. 2C
is a larger view of the mine
10
in the position of
FIG. 1C
, bounding and about to detonate. Referring to
FIG. 2A
, mine
10
includes a band
24
disposed around upper ends of the erection legs
14
for maintaining the erection legs
14
in an upright, folded position. A pyrotechnic band cutter
26
is disposed on the band
24
and electrically connected to the fuze electronics. When mine
10
is deployed, a timer circuit in the fuze electronics starts. When the timer circuit delay ends, the fuze electronics sends a signal to the pyrotechnic band cutter
26
. The band cutter
26
then detonates, cutting band
24
and allowing erection legs
14
to unfold, as shown in
FIGS. 2B and 2C
. Referring to
FIGS. 2B and 2C
, mine
10
includes a bounding portion
18
and a stationary portion
20
. Stationary portion
20
includes erection legs
14
and a cup
22
into which a bottom end of the bounding portion
18
is received.
FIG. 3
is a view, partially in cross-section, of one embodiment of a mine
10
according to the invention. The bounding portion
18
includes a warhead
28
, a safe and arm device
34
, fuze electronics
42
, a radio
44
, a three-axis magnetometer
48
, an acoustic sensor
50
and a power supply
52
. The stationary portion
20
includes a cup
22
for receiving a bottom end of the warhead
28
, a bounding charge
54
disposed below the bottom end of the warhead
28
and a plurality of erection legs
14
connected to the cup
22
.
The bounding charge
54
comprises a propellant igniter
56
electrically connected by, for example, wire
58
to the fuze electronics
42
. The bounding charge
54
may be, for example, M
5
propellant or black powder. The quantity of bounding charge
54
is on the order of 25 grams, depending on the size of the warhead. A plate
62
is disposed between the bounding charge
54
and the bottom end of the warhead
28
. Each erection leg
14
is connected to the cup
22
by a hinge
60
including a torsion spring that tends to force the erection leg
14
away from cup
22
.
The warhead
28
comprises a generally cylindrical mass of explosive
30
having a longitudinal axis and a plurality of asymmetric EFPs
32
. The EFPs
32
are disposed around the circumference of the mass of explosive
30
and are disposed generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive
30
. The explosive
30
is for example, approximately 29 pounds of PAX 3 explosive. The safe and arm device
34
, fuze electronics
42
, radio
44
, three-axis magnetometer
48
, acoustic sensor
50
and power supply
52
are disposed on top of the warhead
28
. The power supply
52
is, for example, lithium thional chloride batteries.
The fuze electronics
42
includes a computer
46
. The computer
46
is connected to the safe and arm device
34
, the radio
44
, the three-axis magnetometer
48
, the acoustic sensor
50
and the power supply
52
. The safe and arm device
34
comprises a fuze cord
36
extending from the top of the warhead
28
along the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive
30
and terminating at about a longitudinal midpoint of the mass of explosive
30
. A detonator
37
is attached to the end of fuze cord
36
. The safe and arm device
34
further comprises at least one of a detonator
40
, disposed at a top center of the explosive
30
, and a detonator
38
, disposed at a bottom center of the explosive
30
. Detonators
38
,
40
are electrically connected to the safe and arm device
34
.
FIG. 4
is a perspective view of an exemplary warhead
28
. Each asymmetric EFP
32
has a substantially elliptical shape with a major axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive
30
.
FIG. 5
is a top view of the warhead
28
. As shown in
FIG. 5
, each EFP
32
includes a concave outer surface
64
and a convex inner surface
66
. In a preferred embodiment, the number of EFPs is sixteen. The EFPs are made of, for example, copper,
302
stainless steel or other suitable metal that will not interfere with the magnetometer
48
. The EFPs
32
may be attached directly to formed explosive
30
by, for example, gluing. Alternatively, the EFPs may be pressed.and inscribed in a flat piece of metal. The flat piece of metal is then rolled into a cylindrical shape and place around the explosive
30
.
If the mine
10
senses that the target is a tracked vehicle (i.e., heavy target), the warhead
48
is detonated using the fuze cord
36
. The fuze cord
36
(
FIG. 3
) initiates detonation from the center of warhead
48
. This type of detonation causes the EFPs to fold into a clothespin like shape, as shown in FIG.
6
. The explosive will project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within
40
meters of the mine. If the target is classified as a wheeled vehicle (i.e., light/medium target), the warhead will detonate at one of its ends
38
,
40
and fragment the EFPs, sending fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.
The computer
46
comprises means for storing acoustic signatures of a variety of target vehicles, both tracked and wheeled. The computer
46
compares the signal received from the acoustic sensor
50
to the stored acoustic signatures, and determines whether a sensed target is tracked (heavy) or wheeled (light/medium). The acoustic sensor
50
is operable in a range of about 100 meters from the mine
10
. Simultaneously, the magnetometer
48
indicates whether or not a suitable target is present, based on the iron content of the target. The range of the magnetometer is shorter, about 38 meters. When the magnetometer
48
senses a suitable target in range, and the magnetometer signal strength has just peaked from a maximum, the computer
46
is then prepared to send a detonate signal to the fuze electronics
42
. However, the acoustic sensor
50
must also be sensing a suitable target, that is, a tracked or wheeled vehicle.
If both sensors have sensed suitable targets, then the computer
46
sends a detonate signal to the fuze electronics
42
. The fuze electronics
42
first sends a detonate signal to the bounding charge
54
. The bounding charge
54
detonates, sending the warhead
28
three to four feet into the air. After a short time delay on the order of milliseconds, the fuze electronics
42
sends a detonate signal to the explosive
30
. Depending on the target sensed, the detonate signal is sent to the fuze cord
36
, or one of the detonators
38
,
40
located at the ends of the warhead
28
.
If the acoustic sensor
50
has sensed that the target is a tracked vehicle (i.e., heavy target), the warhead
48
is detonated using the fuze cord
36
. The fuze cord
36
(
FIG. 3
) initiates detonation from the center of warhead
48
. This type of detonation causes the EFPs to fold into a clothespin like shape, as shown in FIG.
6
. The explosive will project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within 40 meters of the mine. If the acoustic sensor
50
has sensed that the target is a wheeled vehicle (i.e., light/medium target), the warhead detonates at one of its ends
38
,
40
and fragments the EFPs, sending the fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.
While the invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Claims
- 1. An anti-tank anti-vehicle mine, comprising:a bounding portion, the bounding portion comprising a warhead, a safe and arm device, fuze electronics, a radio, a three-axis nagnetometer, an acoustic sensor and a power supply; a stationary portion, the stationary portion comprising a cup for receiving a bottom end of the bounding portion, a bounding charge disposed below the bottom end of the bounding portion and a plurality of erection legs connected to the cup; wherein the said warhead comprises a generally cylindrical mass of explosive having a longitudinal axis and a plurality of asymmetric explosively forged penetrators disposed around a circumference of the mass of explosive and generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive.
- 2. The mine of claim 1 wherein each erection leg is connected to the cup by a hinge having a torsion spring that tends to force the erection leg away from cup.
- 3. The mine of claim 2 wherein the safe and arm device, fuze electronics, radio, three-axis magnetometer, acoustic sensor and power supply are disposed on a top of the warhead.
- 4. The mine of claim 3 wherein the fuze electronics include a computer, the computer being connected to the safe and arm device, the radio, the three-axis magnetometer, the acoustic sensor and the power supply.
- 5. The mine of claim 4 wherein the safe and arm device comprises a fuze cord extending from the top of the warhead along the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive and terminating at about a longitudinal midpoint of the mass of explosive.
- 6. The mine of claim 5 wherein the bounding charge comprises a propellant igniter electrically connected to the fuze electronics.
- 7. The mine of claim 6 wherein the erection legs are held in an unfolded position by a band disposed around upper ends of the erection legs, the mine further comprising a pyrotechnic band cutter disposed on the band and electrically connected to the fuze electronics.
- 8. The mine of claim 7 further comprising a plate disposed between the bounding charge and a bottom end of the warhead.
- 9. The mine of claim 8 wherein each asymmetric explosively forged penetrator has a substantially elliptical shape with a major axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive, a concave outer surface and a convex inner surface.
- 10. The mine of claim 9 wherein the safe and arm device includes a detonator disposed at one of a top center of the warhead or a bottom center of the warhead and electrically connected to the safe and arm device.
- 11. The mine of claim 10 wherein the computer comprises:means for storing acoustic signatures of target vehicles; means for comparing the stored acoustic signatures to sensed acoustic signatures; and means for determining if the sensed acoustic signature corresponds to a tracked or wheeled vehicle.
- 12. The mine of claim 11 wherein the computer comprises:means for determining when the signal from the magnetometer has reached a maximum; and means for sending a detonate signal to the fuze electronics when the magnetometer signal has reached the maximum and the acoustic sensor detects one of a tracked and wheeled vehicle.
- 13. The mine of claim 12 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the bounding charge and then, after a preset time delay, detonates the warhead.
- 14. The mine of claim 13 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the warhead via the fuze cord that terminates at about a longitudinal midpoint of the warhead, if the target is classified as a tracked vehicle.
- 15. The mine of claim 14 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the warhead at one of the top center of the warhead or the bottom center of the warhead, if the target is classified as a wheeled vehicle.
- 16. The mine of claim 15 wherein the fuze electronics includes a self-destruct timer that is remotely settable via the radio.
- 17. The mine of claim 16 wherein the safe and arm device is remotely operable via the radio.
- 18. The mine of claim 17 wherein a number of asymmetric explosively forged penetrators is sixteen.
- 19. The mine of claim 18 wherein a number of erection legs is eight.
US Referenced Citations (25)