Bounding anti-tank/anti-vehicle weapon

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6606951
  • Patent Number
    6,606,951
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 7, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 19, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine attacks and destroys multiple targets simultaneously at the targets” closest point of approach. This is accomplished by utilizing multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrators (EFPs) on a warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills horizontally in 360 degrees. The warhead comprises, for example, 16 curved copper or non-ferrous EFP metal plates arranged parallel to the central axis of the mine. The warhead is initiated either centrally or from either end, depending on the type of target being attacked.
Description




FEDERAL RESEARCH STATEMENT




[The inventions described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the U.S. Government for U.S. Government purposes.]




BACKGROUND OF INVENTION




The invention relates in general to munitions and in particular to a bounding anti-tank/anti-vehicle mine.




With the exception of wide area mines, present anti-armor mines do not protect large areas. Wide area mines are comparatively expensive and not very reliable. In addition, present mines, only attack one target per mine. This problem has existed for 50 years. Present wide area mines do not produce catastrophic kills or firepower kills.




The old way to solve the problem was to plant a lot of antitank mines and hope that one of them would encounter a vehicle. This method involved a lot of mines which became a logistics problem and was very man-hour intensive.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




An important advantage of the present invention is that it can kill multiple armor and vehicle targets in 360 degrees over a wide area with one mine. This is accomplished by the use of a multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrator (EFP) warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills from a single warhead horizontally in 360 degrees. In addition, the firing train of the warhead can modify the output from the warhead to tailor it to the particular type of target of interest.











The invention will be better understood, and further objects, features, and advantages thereof will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS




In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.





FIGS. 1A-D

show the operational sequence of the mine according to the invention.





FIG. 2A

is a larger view of the mine in the position of

FIG. 1A

,

FIG. 2B

is a larger view of the mine in the position of FIG.


1


B and

FIG. 2C

is a larger view of the mine in the position of FIG.


1


C.





FIG. 3

is a view, partially in cross-section, of one embodiment of a mine according to the invention.





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of an exemplary warhead.





FIG. 5

is a top view of the warhead.





FIG. 6

is a side view of an explosively forged penetrator, after detonation.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention is a bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine specifically designed to attack and destroy multiple targets simultaneously at the targets” closest point of approach. This is accomplished by utilizing multiple asymmetric explosively forged penetrators (EFPs) on a warhead that is capable of producing multiple armor penetrating kills horizontally in 360 degrees. The warhead comprises, for example, 16 curved copper or non-ferrous EFP metal plates approximately 1.375″×10″ long arranged parallel to the central axis of the mine. The warhead contains, for example, approximately 29 pounds of PAX 3 explosive and is initiated either centrally or from either end, depending on the type of target being attacked.




When the warhead is initiated, the EFP metal plates fold into a clothespin shape that focuses all the energy of the explosive along a horizontal plane perpendicular to the central axis of the mine. This focusing of the explosive energy allows the EFP to punch through many inches of armor. The mine can be command controlled on-off-on with multiple remotely settable self-destruct times. The mine utilizes a three-axis magnetometer and an acoustic sensor to both detect, range gate, and classify a target. The mine waits for the closest point of approach of a given target and classifies the target as either light/medium or heavy. The warhead then bounds in the air three to four feet and detonates in a way that is appropriate for the target's classification. If the target is classified as an armor (i.e., heavy) target, the warhead will bound, detonate at its center and project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within 40 meters of the mine. If the target is classified as light/medium, the warhead will bound, detonate at one of its ends and fragment the EFPs, sending fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.





FIGS. 1A-D

show an example of the operational sequence of the mine


10


according to the invention. The bounding anti-armor/anti-vehicle mine


10


may be, for example, deployed by hand, vehicle, air or missile. After impact of mine


10


on the ground


12


(FIG.


1


A), erection legs


14


(

FIG. 1B

) are released. The erection legs


14


erect the mine


10


in a vertical position. A radio command is sent to the mine


10


, arming the mine and setting its self-destruct time. Upon magnetic and acoustic detection of a vehicular target


16


(FIG.


1


C), the mine


10


waits for the closest point of approach and then, the bounding portion


18


bounds in the air three to four feet. A stationary portion


20


remains on the ground. The warhead then detonates (

FIG. 1D

) and sprays EFP fragments horizontally in 360 degrees penetrating the targets


16


and destroying them.





FIG. 2A

is a larger view of the mine


10


in the position of

FIG. 1A

(except oriented vertically rather than horizontally),

FIG. 2B

is a larger view of the mine


10


in the position of

FIG. 1B

, armed and erect, and

FIG. 2C

is a larger view of the mine


10


in the position of

FIG. 1C

, bounding and about to detonate. Referring to

FIG. 2A

, mine


10


includes a band


24


disposed around upper ends of the erection legs


14


for maintaining the erection legs


14


in an upright, folded position. A pyrotechnic band cutter


26


is disposed on the band


24


and electrically connected to the fuze electronics. When mine


10


is deployed, a timer circuit in the fuze electronics starts. When the timer circuit delay ends, the fuze electronics sends a signal to the pyrotechnic band cutter


26


. The band cutter


26


then detonates, cutting band


24


and allowing erection legs


14


to unfold, as shown in

FIGS. 2B and 2C

. Referring to

FIGS. 2B and 2C

, mine


10


includes a bounding portion


18


and a stationary portion


20


. Stationary portion


20


includes erection legs


14


and a cup


22


into which a bottom end of the bounding portion


18


is received.





FIG. 3

is a view, partially in cross-section, of one embodiment of a mine


10


according to the invention. The bounding portion


18


includes a warhead


28


, a safe and arm device


34


, fuze electronics


42


, a radio


44


, a three-axis magnetometer


48


, an acoustic sensor


50


and a power supply


52


. The stationary portion


20


includes a cup


22


for receiving a bottom end of the warhead


28


, a bounding charge


54


disposed below the bottom end of the warhead


28


and a plurality of erection legs


14


connected to the cup


22


.




The bounding charge


54


comprises a propellant igniter


56


electrically connected by, for example, wire


58


to the fuze electronics


42


. The bounding charge


54


may be, for example, M


5


propellant or black powder. The quantity of bounding charge


54


is on the order of 25 grams, depending on the size of the warhead. A plate


62


is disposed between the bounding charge


54


and the bottom end of the warhead


28


. Each erection leg


14


is connected to the cup


22


by a hinge


60


including a torsion spring that tends to force the erection leg


14


away from cup


22


.




The warhead


28


comprises a generally cylindrical mass of explosive


30


having a longitudinal axis and a plurality of asymmetric EFPs


32


. The EFPs


32


are disposed around the circumference of the mass of explosive


30


and are disposed generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive


30


. The explosive


30


is for example, approximately 29 pounds of PAX 3 explosive. The safe and arm device


34


, fuze electronics


42


, radio


44


, three-axis magnetometer


48


, acoustic sensor


50


and power supply


52


are disposed on top of the warhead


28


. The power supply


52


is, for example, lithium thional chloride batteries.




The fuze electronics


42


includes a computer


46


. The computer


46


is connected to the safe and arm device


34


, the radio


44


, the three-axis magnetometer


48


, the acoustic sensor


50


and the power supply


52


. The safe and arm device


34


comprises a fuze cord


36


extending from the top of the warhead


28


along the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive


30


and terminating at about a longitudinal midpoint of the mass of explosive


30


. A detonator


37


is attached to the end of fuze cord


36


. The safe and arm device


34


further comprises at least one of a detonator


40


, disposed at a top center of the explosive


30


, and a detonator


38


, disposed at a bottom center of the explosive


30


. Detonators


38


,


40


are electrically connected to the safe and arm device


34


.





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of an exemplary warhead


28


. Each asymmetric EFP


32


has a substantially elliptical shape with a major axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive


30


.

FIG. 5

is a top view of the warhead


28


. As shown in

FIG. 5

, each EFP


32


includes a concave outer surface


64


and a convex inner surface


66


. In a preferred embodiment, the number of EFPs is sixteen. The EFPs are made of, for example, copper,


302


stainless steel or other suitable metal that will not interfere with the magnetometer


48


. The EFPs


32


may be attached directly to formed explosive


30


by, for example, gluing. Alternatively, the EFPs may be pressed.and inscribed in a flat piece of metal. The flat piece of metal is then rolled into a cylindrical shape and place around the explosive


30


.




If the mine


10


senses that the target is a tracked vehicle (i.e., heavy target), the warhead


48


is detonated using the fuze cord


36


. The fuze cord


36


(

FIG. 3

) initiates detonation from the center of warhead


48


. This type of detonation causes the EFPs to fold into a clothespin like shape, as shown in FIG.


6


. The explosive will project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within


40


meters of the mine. If the target is classified as a wheeled vehicle (i.e., light/medium target), the warhead will detonate at one of its ends


38


,


40


and fragment the EFPs, sending fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.




The computer


46


comprises means for storing acoustic signatures of a variety of target vehicles, both tracked and wheeled. The computer


46


compares the signal received from the acoustic sensor


50


to the stored acoustic signatures, and determines whether a sensed target is tracked (heavy) or wheeled (light/medium). The acoustic sensor


50


is operable in a range of about 100 meters from the mine


10


. Simultaneously, the magnetometer


48


indicates whether or not a suitable target is present, based on the iron content of the target. The range of the magnetometer is shorter, about 38 meters. When the magnetometer


48


senses a suitable target in range, and the magnetometer signal strength has just peaked from a maximum, the computer


46


is then prepared to send a detonate signal to the fuze electronics


42


. However, the acoustic sensor


50


must also be sensing a suitable target, that is, a tracked or wheeled vehicle.




If both sensors have sensed suitable targets, then the computer


46


sends a detonate signal to the fuze electronics


42


. The fuze electronics


42


first sends a detonate signal to the bounding charge


54


. The bounding charge


54


detonates, sending the warhead


28


three to four feet into the air. After a short time delay on the order of milliseconds, the fuze electronics


42


sends a detonate signal to the explosive


30


. Depending on the target sensed, the detonate signal is sent to the fuze cord


36


, or one of the detonators


38


,


40


located at the ends of the warhead


28


.




If the acoustic sensor


50


has sensed that the target is a tracked vehicle (i.e., heavy target), the warhead


48


is detonated using the fuze cord


36


. The fuze cord


36


(

FIG. 3

) initiates detonation from the center of warhead


48


. This type of detonation causes the EFPs to fold into a clothespin like shape, as shown in FIG.


6


. The explosive will project the clothespin shaped EFP's in 360 degrees horizontally, killing multiple targets within 40 meters of the mine. If the acoustic sensor


50


has sensed that the target is a wheeled vehicle (i.e., light/medium target), the warhead detonates at one of its ends


38


,


40


and fragments the EFPs, sending the fragments in 360 degrees horizontally.




While the invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.



Claims
  • 1. An anti-tank anti-vehicle mine, comprising:a bounding portion, the bounding portion comprising a warhead, a safe and arm device, fuze electronics, a radio, a three-axis nagnetometer, an acoustic sensor and a power supply; a stationary portion, the stationary portion comprising a cup for receiving a bottom end of the bounding portion, a bounding charge disposed below the bottom end of the bounding portion and a plurality of erection legs connected to the cup; wherein the said warhead comprises a generally cylindrical mass of explosive having a longitudinal axis and a plurality of asymmetric explosively forged penetrators disposed around a circumference of the mass of explosive and generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive.
  • 2. The mine of claim 1 wherein each erection leg is connected to the cup by a hinge having a torsion spring that tends to force the erection leg away from cup.
  • 3. The mine of claim 2 wherein the safe and arm device, fuze electronics, radio, three-axis magnetometer, acoustic sensor and power supply are disposed on a top of the warhead.
  • 4. The mine of claim 3 wherein the fuze electronics include a computer, the computer being connected to the safe and arm device, the radio, the three-axis magnetometer, the acoustic sensor and the power supply.
  • 5. The mine of claim 4 wherein the safe and arm device comprises a fuze cord extending from the top of the warhead along the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive and terminating at about a longitudinal midpoint of the mass of explosive.
  • 6. The mine of claim 5 wherein the bounding charge comprises a propellant igniter electrically connected to the fuze electronics.
  • 7. The mine of claim 6 wherein the erection legs are held in an unfolded position by a band disposed around upper ends of the erection legs, the mine further comprising a pyrotechnic band cutter disposed on the band and electrically connected to the fuze electronics.
  • 8. The mine of claim 7 further comprising a plate disposed between the bounding charge and a bottom end of the warhead.
  • 9. The mine of claim 8 wherein each asymmetric explosively forged penetrator has a substantially elliptical shape with a major axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the mass of explosive, a concave outer surface and a convex inner surface.
  • 10. The mine of claim 9 wherein the safe and arm device includes a detonator disposed at one of a top center of the warhead or a bottom center of the warhead and electrically connected to the safe and arm device.
  • 11. The mine of claim 10 wherein the computer comprises:means for storing acoustic signatures of target vehicles; means for comparing the stored acoustic signatures to sensed acoustic signatures; and means for determining if the sensed acoustic signature corresponds to a tracked or wheeled vehicle.
  • 12. The mine of claim 11 wherein the computer comprises:means for determining when the signal from the magnetometer has reached a maximum; and means for sending a detonate signal to the fuze electronics when the magnetometer signal has reached the maximum and the acoustic sensor detects one of a tracked and wheeled vehicle.
  • 13. The mine of claim 12 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the bounding charge and then, after a preset time delay, detonates the warhead.
  • 14. The mine of claim 13 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the warhead via the fuze cord that terminates at about a longitudinal midpoint of the warhead, if the target is classified as a tracked vehicle.
  • 15. The mine of claim 14 wherein the fuze electronics detonates the warhead at one of the top center of the warhead or the bottom center of the warhead, if the target is classified as a wheeled vehicle.
  • 16. The mine of claim 15 wherein the fuze electronics includes a self-destruct timer that is remotely settable via the radio.
  • 17. The mine of claim 16 wherein the safe and arm device is remotely operable via the radio.
  • 18. The mine of claim 17 wherein a number of asymmetric explosively forged penetrators is sixteen.
  • 19. The mine of claim 18 wherein a number of erection legs is eight.
US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
3868905 Ragailler Mar 1975 A
3921528 Faulstich et al. Nov 1975 A
3994227 Harvey Nov 1976 A
4210082 Brothers Jul 1980 A
4538519 Witt et al. Sep 1985 A
4649828 Henderson et al. Mar 1987 A
4848236 Hembise Jul 1989 A
4860658 Lindstadt et al. Aug 1989 A
4919051 Cohen Apr 1990 A
4922824 Schubart May 1990 A
4934274 Mathey Jun 1990 A
5070786 Hartman et al. Dec 1991 A
5142986 Gundel Sep 1992 A
5169093 Schoffl Dec 1992 A
5191169 Hu Mar 1993 A
5245926 Hunter Sep 1993 A
5261328 de la Haye Nov 1993 A
5271331 Miller Dec 1993 A
5279229 Bredy et al. Jan 1994 A
5497705 Bredy et al. Mar 1996 A
5540156 Fong Jul 1996 A
5753851 Jordan et al. May 1998 A
6363854 Schweitzer Apr 2002 B1
6408763 Hurtta et al. Jun 2002 B1
6487952 Borgwarth et al. Dec 2002 B1