Embodiments herein generally relate to devices using rollers and more particularly to adjusting the relative axis of adjacent rollers to reduce gaps in the nip between the rollers.
Many devices, such as printing devices use pairs of opposing rollers to form a nip where the rollers contact. Conformal contact in the nip between such rollers, as increasingly important components on imaging apparatus, is useful for uniformity and efficiency. Such rollers can include bias charging roller (BCR) and drum photoreceptor (PR), fountain roller and metering roller, fuser roller and pressure roller, oil delivery roll and PR/BCR, etc.
While designed to have a constant diameter, in practice, the outer roller surface is not always perfectly straight (and the coated surface of the roller may not always be flat). As a result, efficient conformal contact between two rollers with bumpy surfaces has been routinely implemented by deforming a thick elastomeric layer of one or two rollers. Such deformation is large and the required pre-load to cause the deformation is high. Further, this presents challenges when applied on a high respect ratio miniature roller, especially with a thin layer coating in the range of 10 μm-1 mm. Sometimes even complete yield deformation of the thin layer coating may not completely seal the gap between two roller surfaces.
A pair of opposing rollers comprises a first roller and a second roller contacting the first roller to form a nip between the rollers. Surfaces of the first roller and the second roller can have different hardness measures. Further, the surface of each roller is substantially parallel to the roller axis along the full length of each roller (from one end of each roller to the opposite end of each roller) and the diameter of each roller is substantially consistent along the full length of each roller. Because of surface curves and irregularities caused by wear, manufacturing tolerances, etc., in the rollers surfaces (as opposed to intended diameter changes of cone shaped or elliptical rollers) the nip can have one or more unintended gaps (or areas of reduced nip pressure) at locations where the surface of the first roller separates from the surface second roller.
A frame holds the first roller and the second roller. Further, the frame applies force to ends of the first roller to bow the first roller toward the second roller. An optional detector (optical detector, pressure detector, electrical/inductive detector, air pressure detector, sonic detector, etc.) can be operatively connected to the controller and can automatically measure such gaps. A manual or automatic axis adjuster is operatively connected to the controller, the detector, and the first roller. For example, the axis adjuster can be any structure from a manual screw adjuster to a fully automated actuator. The axis adjuster (potentially automatically and dynamically) changes the angle of the axis of the first roller (a first axis) relative to the axis of the second roller (a second axis) based on the gap to position the first axis in a position other than parallel to the second axis. The axis adjuster can adjust the first axis in a single plane or in multiple planes.
The adjuster changes the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis to reduce or eliminate the gap. More specifically, changing the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis reduces or eliminates one or more of the gaps, without increasing other gaps and without forming additional gaps. Therefore, changing the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis makes the contact between the two rollers more uniform, and allows the amount of pressure exerted between the rollers to be decreased, relative to a non-bowed, parallel roller structure. The angle of the first axis of the first roller relative to the second axis of the second roller can be, for example, from about 0.01° to about 30°, and the gap between the pair of opposing rollers can be, for example, from about 1 μm to about 1 mm. Also, the aspect ratio of the first roller can be larger than the aspect ratio of the second roller.
An exemplary method embodiment herein measures the gap between the pair of opposing rollers. This exemplary method also adjusts the axis adjuster to change the angle of the first axis of the first roller relative to the second axis of the second roller to position the first axis in a position other than parallel to the second axis. Again, changing the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis reduces or eliminates the gap.
These and other features are described in, or are apparent from, the following detailed description.
Various exemplary embodiments of the systems and methods are described in detail below, with reference to the attached drawing figures, in which:
As mentioned above, nips formed between rollers with bumpy surfaces presents challenges to completely sealing the gap between the two roller surfaces. In view of such challenges, the methods and devices herein provide a non-parallelism method/structure to create efficient conformal contact between two roller surfaces. These methods and devices align the axes of two rollers in a non-parallelism position. Particularly, one roller is actively bent towards the other roller to make good conformal contact. This produces reduced deformation, reduced pre-load and less rigorous requirements on alignment tolerance. These methods and devices are generic and beneficial for efficient conformal contact of a roller, especially miniature rollers with a thin layer coating having a thickness from about 1 μm to 1 mm.
Such surface non-uniformities are even more pronounced for a miniature contact roller with a high respect ratio and a very thin layer coating and it may not be possible to achieve full deformation of the thin layer to completely fill the gap between the rollers. Further, this could cause collapse of any features on the layer.
In view of the issues, the methods and structures herein position the axis of the rollers in a non-parallel alignment to provide sufficient conformal contact.
where E is the Young's modulus of the roller, assumed equal to ˜30 GPa (steel) in this disclosure, L is length of the roller as 370 mm, D is diameter of the steel shaft of the roller as 4 mm, and y is the maximum gap assumed as 1 mm. Therefore, the required force is calculated as ˜2.86N.
In one specific example, for contact between a diameter Φ6 mm miniature roller with soft elastomeric layer, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), and a photoreceptor (P/R) drum with diameter Φ60 mm. In this example, it is assumed that the deformation only happens on the PDMS layer, because the Young's modulus of PDMS is only 5 Mpa, at least two-order smaller than the Young's modulus of P/R˜1.2 Gpa. According to Hertz contact theory, for two cylindrical surfaces, the maximum deformation on PDMS layer for contact between two crossed cylinders is:
The minimum deformation on PDMS layer for contact between two cylinders with parallel axes is:
where R is the radius of the miniature roller; L is the length of the miniature roller; and v is the Poisson ratio.
Thus, these two possible contact examples between rollers is a minimum deformation for contact between two crossed cylinders positioned to have perpindicular axis; and maximum deformation for contact between two cylinders positioned to have parallel axes.
In this non-parallel alignment method, the angle between two axes of the cylinders to make two rollers in complete contact can be determined based
This angle is very small so that the real deformation on most part of the PDMS layer surface is much closer to 9 μm, much smaller than 1 mm. Therefore, 100 μm to 1 mm thickness of PDMS layer is far enough to satisfy the efficient conformal contact.
From Eq. (3), it can be further seen that for traditional parallelism alignment method, the increase of the roller length will cause larger pre-load as required to deform the layer coating to ensure the dmin equal to the gap; it becomes worse for stiffer material. However, based on the parallelism of the methods and devices herein, one can always adjust the angle between two axes to reduce the required pre-load for a stiffer material.
Further, with the methods and devices herein using rigid materials to make the roller is not always required in practical alignment; because, from Eq. (1), the less rigid roller can actually reduce the required force to bend the roller into contact with another cylinderical surface. This can also reduce wear rate on both roller surfaces. In addition, a smaller diameter roller is actually preferred in this application for the same reason, which is different from traditional design, which always requires larger diameter, stiffer, and shorter rollers to maintain straightness for better contact. In addition, with devices and methods herein, the surface roughness is not critical because bending the roller compensates for conformal contact. In addition, with devices and methods herein the thickness of PDMS layer on the roller can be less than 1 mm, which is desirable for current designs.
While one example of a device that can alter the axis of one roller relative to another is shown in
As shown in
Further, such rollers are flat rollers (other than the bowing discussed above). Therefore, the surface of each roller is substantially parallel to the roller axis along the full length of each roller (from one end of each roller to the opposite end of each roller) and the diameter of each roller is substantially consistent along the full length of each roller (although the rollers can be different sizes and have different diameters). Because of surface curves and irregularities in the rollers surfaces caused by wear, manufacturing tolerances, etc., (as opposed to intended diameter changes of cone shaped or elliptical rollers) the nip 104 can have one or more unintended gaps (or areas of reduced nip pressure) at locations 108 where the surface of the first roller 100 partially or fully separates from the surface second roller 102, as shown for example in
A frame 114 (
The adjuster 110 changes the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis to reduce or eliminate the gap. More specifically, changing the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis reduces or eliminates one or more of the gaps, without increasing other gaps and without forming additional gaps. Therefore, changing the angle of the first axis relative to the second axis makes the contact between the two rollers more uniform, and allows the amount of pressure exerted between the rollers to be decreased, relative to a non-bowed, parallel roller structure. The angle of the first axis of the first roller relative to the second axis of the second roller can be, for example, from about 0.01° to about 30°, and the gap between the pair of opposing rollers can be, for example, from about 1 μm to about 1 mm. Also, the aspect ratio of the first roller can be larger than the aspect ratio of the second roller.
Further, the axis adjuster 110 can adjust the first axis in a single plane or in multiple planes. For example, as shown in perspective, side, and top views (respectively in
To the contrary, as shown in perspective, side, and top views (respectively in
An exemplary method embodiment herein shown in flowchart form in
An exemplary printing apparatus herein can include for example, a controller, a paper path operatively (directly or indirectly) connected to the controller, a marking engine operatively connected to the controller and positioned along the paper path, etc. The marking engine places marks on print media transported by the paper path.
More specifically, referring to
An electronic or optical image or an image of an original document or set of documents to be reproduced may be projected or scanned onto a charged surface 13 or a photoreceptor belt 18 to form an electrostatic latent image. The belt photoreceptor 18 here is mounted on a set of rollers 26. At least one of the rollers is driven to move the photoreceptor in the direction indicated by arrow 21 past the various other known electrostatic processing stations including a charging station 28, imaging station 24 (for a raster scan laser system 25), developing station 30, and transfer station 32.
Thus, the latent image is developed with developing material to form a toner image corresponding to the latent image. More specifically, a sheet 15 is fed from a selected paper tray supply 33 to a sheet transport 34 for travel to the transfer station 32. There, the toned image is electrostatically transferred to a final print media material 15, to which it may be permanently fixed by a fusing device 16. The sheet is stripped from the photoreceptor 18 and conveyed to a fusing station 36 having fusing device 16 where the toner image is fused to the sheet. A guide can be applied to the substrate 15 to lead it away from the fuser roll. After separating from the fuser roll, the substrate 15 is then transported by a sheet output transport 37 to output trays a multi-function finishing station 50.
Printed sheets 15 from the printer 10 can be accepted at an entry port 38 and directed to multiple paths and output trays 54, 55 for printed sheets, corresponding to different desired actions, such as stapling, hole-punching and C or Z-folding. The finisher 50 can also optionally include, for example, a modular booklet maker 40 although those ordinarily skilled in the art would understand that the finisher 50 could comprise any functional unit, and that the modular booklet maker 40 is merely shown as one example. The finished booklets are collected in a stacker 70. It is to be understood that various rollers and other devices which contact and handle sheets within finisher module 50 are driven by various motors, solenoids and other electromechanical devices (not shown), under a control system, such as including the microprocessor 60 of the control panel 17 or elsewhere, in a manner generally familiar in the art.
Thus, the multi-functional finisher 50 has a top tray 54 and a main tray 55 and a folding and booklet making section 40 that adds stapled and unstapled booklet making, and single sheet C-fold and Z-fold capabilities. The top tray 54 is used as a purge destination, as well as, a destination for the simplest of jobs that require no finishing and no collated stacking. The main tray 55 can have, for example, a pair of pass-through sheet upside down staplers 56 and is used for most jobs that require stacking or stapling
As would be understood by those ordinarily skilled in the art, the printing device 10 shown in
Many computerized devices are discussed above. Computerized devices that include chip-based central processing units (CPU's), input/output devices (including graphic user interfaces (GUI), memories, comparators, processors, etc. are well-known and readily available devices produced by manufacturers such as Dell Computers, Round Rock Tex., USA and Apple Computer Co., Cupertino Calif., USA. Such computerized devices commonly include input/output devices, power supplies, processors, electronic storage memories, wiring, etc., the details of which are omitted herefrom to allow the reader to focus on the salient aspects of the embodiments described herein. Similarly, scanners and other similar peripheral equipment are available from Xerox Corporation, Norwalk, Conn., USA and the details of such devices are not discussed herein for purposes of brevity and reader focus.
The terms printer or printing device as used herein encompasses any apparatus, such as a digital copier, bookmaking machine, facsimile machine, multi-function machine, etc., which performs a print outputting function for any purpose. The details of printers, printing engines, etc., are well-known by those ordinarily skilled in the art. The embodiments herein can encompass embodiments that print in color, monochrome, or handle color or monochrome image data. All foregoing embodiments are specifically applicable to electrostatographic and/or xerographic machines and/or processes.
In addition, terms such as “right”, “left”, “vertical”, “horizontal”, “top”, “bottom”, “upper”, “lower”, “under”, “below”, “underlying”, “over”, “overlying”, “parallel”, “perpendicular”, etc., used herein are understood to be relative locations as they are oriented and illustrated in the drawings (unless otherwise indicated). Terms such as “touching”, “on”, “in direct contact”, “abutting”, “directly adjacent to”, etc., mean that at least one element physically contacts another element (without other elements separating the described elements). Further, the terms automated or automatically mean that once a process is started (by a machine or a user), one or more machines perform the process without further input from any user.
It will be appreciated that the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations, or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims. Unless specifically defined in a specific claim itself, steps or components of the embodiments herein cannot be implied or imported from any above example as limitations to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.