The present disclosure relates in general to heart valve replacement and, in particular, to collapsible prosthetic heart valves. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to devices and methods for positioning and sealing collapsible prosthetic heart valves within a native valve annulus.
Prosthetic heart valves that are collapsible to a relatively small circumferential size can be delivered into a patient less invasively than valves that are not collapsible. For example, a collapsible valve may be delivered into a patient via a tube-like delivery apparatus such as a catheter, a trocar, a laparoscopic instrument, or the like. This collapsibility can avoid the need for a more invasive procedure such as full open-chest, open-heart surgery.
Collapsible prosthetic heart valves typically take the form of a valve structure mounted on a stent. There are two common types of stents on which the valve structures are mounted: a self-expanding stent or a balloon-expandable stent. To place such valves into a delivery apparatus and ultimately into a patient, the valve must first be collapsed or crimped to reduce its circumferential size.
When a collapsed prosthetic valve has reached the desired implant site in the patient (e.g., at or near the annulus of the patient's heart valve that is to be replaced by the prosthetic valve), the prosthetic valve can be deployed or released from the delivery apparatus and re-expanded to full operating size. For balloon-expandable valves, this generally involves releasing the entire valve, and then expanding a balloon positioned within the valve stent. For self-expanding valves, on the other hand, the stent automatically expands as the sheath covering the valve is withdrawn.
In some embodiments, a prosthetic heart valve for replacing a native valve includes a stent including a plurality of struts forming cells, the stent having a collapsed condition and an expanded condition. A valve assembly is disposed within the stent, the valve assembly including a plurality of leaflets and a cuff. At least one runner is coupled to a cell, the at least one runner being configured to transition from a first configuration to a second configuration when the stent moves from the collapsed condition to the expanded condition, the at least one runner projecting radially outwardly from the cell in the second configuration.
In some embodiments, a prosthetic heart valve for replacing a native valve includes a stent including a plurality of struts forming cells, the stent having a collapsed condition and an expanded condition. A valve assembly is disposed within the stent, the valve assembly including a plurality of leaflets and a cuff. A nested strut is coupled to a cell, the nested strut being configured to transition from a first configuration to a second configuration when the stent moves from the collapsed condition to the expanded condition, the nested strut projecting radially outwardly from the cell in the second configuration.
Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the appended drawings. It is to be appreciated that these drawings depict only some embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope.
Despite various improvements that have been made to the collapsible prosthetic heart valve delivery process, conventional devices suffer from some shortcomings. For example, with conventional self-expanding valves, the clinical success of the valve is dependent on accurate deployment and anchoring. Inaccurate deployment and anchoring of the valve increases risks, such as those associated with valve migration, which may cause complications due to the obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. Inaccurate deployment and anchoring may also result in the leakage of blood between the implanted heart valve and the native valve annulus, commonly referred to as paravalvular leakage (also known as “perivalvular leakage”). In aortic valves, this leakage enables blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle, reducing cardiac efficiency and putting a greater strain on the heart muscle. Additionally, calcification of the aortic valve may affect performance and the interaction between the implanted valve and the calcified tissue is believed to be relevant to leakage, as will be outlined below.
Moreover, anatomical variations from one patient to another may cause a fully deployed heart valve to function improperly, requiring removal of the valve from the patient or performing an additional valve-in-valve procedure. Removing a fully deployed heart valve increases the length of the procedure as well as risks. Thus, methods and devices are desirable that would reduce the need to remove a prosthetic heart valve from a patient. Methods and devices are also desirable that would reduce the likelihood of paravalvular leakage due to gaps between the implanted heart valve and patient tissue.
There therefore is a need for further improvements to the devices, systems, and methods for positioning and sealing collapsible prosthetic heart valves. Specifically, there is a need for further improvements to the devices, systems, and methods for accurately implanting a prosthetic heart valve. Among other advantages, the present disclosure may address one or more of these needs.
As used herein, the term “proximal,” when used in connection with a prosthetic heart valve, refers to the end of the heart valve closest to the heart when the heart valve is implanted in a patient, whereas the term “distal,” when used in connection with a prosthetic heart valve, refers to the end of the heart valve farthest from the heart when the heart valve is implanted in a patient. When used in connection with devices for delivering a prosthetic heart valve or other medical device into a patient, the terms “trailing” and “leading” are to be taken as relative to the user of the delivery devices. “Trailing” is to be understood as relatively close to the user, and “leading” is to be understood as relatively farther away from the user.
The sealing elements of the present disclosure may be used in connection with collapsible prosthetic heart valves.
Prosthetic heart valve 100 will be described in more detail with reference to
Stent 102 may include one or more retaining elements 168 at distal end 132 thereof, retaining elements 168 being sized and shaped to cooperate with female retaining structures (not shown) provided on the deployment device. The engagement of retaining elements 168 with the female retaining structures on the deployment device helps maintain prosthetic heart valve 100 in assembled relationship with the deployment device, minimizes longitudinal movement of the prosthetic heart valve relative to the deployment device during unsheathing or resheathing procedures, and helps prevent rotation of the prosthetic heart valve relative to the deployment device as the deployment device is advanced to the target location and the heart valve deployed.
Prosthetic heart valve 100 includes valve assembly 104 preferably secured to stent 102 in annulus section 140. Valve assembly 104 includes cuff 176 and a plurality of leaflets 178 which collectively function as a one-way valve by coapting with one another. As a prosthetic aortic valve, valve 100 has three leaflets 178. However, it will be appreciated that other prosthetic heart valves with which the sealing elements of the present disclosure may be used may have a greater or lesser number of leaflets.
Although cuff 176 is shown in
Leaflets 178 may be attached along their belly portions to cells 162 of stent 102, with the commissure between adjacent leaflets 178 attached to commissure features 166. As can be seen in
Prosthetic heart valve 100 may be used to replace a native aortic valve, a surgical heart valve or a heart valve that has undergone a surgical procedure. Prosthetic heart valve 100 may be delivered to the desired site (e.g., near the native aortic annulus) using any suitable delivery device. During delivery, prosthetic heart valve 100 is disposed inside the delivery device in the collapsed configuration. The delivery device may be introduced into a patient using a transfemoral, transapical, transaortic, transsubclavian, transseptal or any other percutaneous approach. Once the delivery device has reached the target site, the user may deploy prosthetic heart valve 100. Upon deployment, prosthetic heart valve 100 expands so that annulus section 140 is in secure engagement within the native aortic annulus. When prosthetic heart valve 100 is properly positioned inside the heart, it works as a one-way valve, allowing blood to flow from the left ventricle of the heart to the aorta, and preventing blood from flowing in the opposite direction.
Stent 306 may include a plurality of struts 320. Certain struts 320 may terminate in retaining elements 321 at distal end 304. Struts 320 may come together to form cells 322 connected to one another in one or more annular rows around the stent. Connected to struts 320 are a plurality of runners 330, which are additional struts that bow or bulge out radially where stent 306 is expanded, as will be described in greater detail with reference to
In order to better appreciate the attachment and placement of runners 330, stent 306 is shown in
One or more cells 322 may include runners 330. An enlarged partial side view of cell 322 including runner 330 is shown in
Runners 330 may extend from first attachment end 335a where struts 320a and 320c meet to second attachment end 335b where struts 320b and 320d meet, and may be affixed to stent 306 by welding, adhesive, or any other suitable technique known in the art. Moreover, instead of being separately formed and affixed to stent 306 at attachment ends 335a,335b, runners 330 may be integrally formed with stent 306, such as by laser cutting both stent 306 and runners 330 from the same tube. Additionally, runners 330 may be formed of a shape memory material such as those described above for forming stent 102 of
In the collapsed configuration, runner 330 may bisect cell 322 into first portion 360a and second portion 360b. As cell 322 foreshortens in the expanded configuration of heart valve 300, the unchanged length of runner 330 causes the runner to bow or deflect outwardly of the curved surface defined by struts 320a, 320b, 320c, 320d. Stent 306 may also be heat set such that struts 320 and runner 330 return to a predetermined shape in the fully expanded configuration (e.g., when no external forces are applied thereto). When cuff 312 (
A method of delivering and implanting heart valve 300 will now be described with reference to
When delivery system 400 has reached the proper location (e.g., atraumatic tip 430 is just past native valve annulus 250), atraumatic tip 430 may be advanced slightly in the direction of arrow S1 toward the left ventricle by pushing shaft 420 toward atraumatic tip 430 while holding sheath 410 in place, which serves to decouple atraumatic tip 430 from sheath 410 (
After sheath 410 has been fully retracted to expose heart valve 300, runners 330, now in their bowed or curved configuration, push cuff 312 outwardly against native valve annulus 250 and occlude gaps 200 between heart valve 300 and native valve annulus 250, thereby reducing or eliminating the amount of blood that passes around heart valve 300 through gaps 200 (
Several variations of runners are described with reference to
Another variation, shown in
Additionally, runners may be provided at a variety of locations on a stent. For example, in
Stent 1106 may include a plurality of struts 1120, which may come together to form cells, such as cell 1122A, connected to one another in one or more annular rows around the stent. Connected to struts 1120 are a plurality of runners 1130A, which are additional struts that bow or bulge out radially when stent 1106 is expanded, as will be described in greater detail with reference to
While the devices disclosed herein are for use in connection with heart valve stents having a particular shape, the stents could have different shapes, such as a flared or conical annulus section, a less-bulbous aortic section, and the like, as well as a differently shaped transition section. Additionally, though the runners have been described in connection with expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement, they may also be used in connection with other expandable cardiac valves, as well as with surgical valves, sutureless valves and other devices in which it is desirable to create a seal between the periphery of the device and the adjacent body tissue.
Moreover, although the disclosures herein are for particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present disclosure. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present claims.
It will be appreciated that the various dependent claims and the features set forth therein can be combined in different ways than presented in the initial claims. It will also be appreciated that the features described in connection with individual embodiments may be shared with others of the described embodiments.
In some embodiments, a prosthetic heart valve for replacing a native valve includes a stent including a plurality of struts forming cells, the stent having a collapsed condition and an expanded condition. A valve assembly is disposed within the stent, the valve assembly including a plurality of leaflets and a cuff. At least one runner is coupled to a cell, the at least one runner being configured to transition from a first configuration to a second configuration when the stent moves from the collapsed condition to the expanded condition, the at least one runner projecting radially outwardly from the cell in the second configuration.
In some examples, the at least one runner is substantially linear in the first configuration, and/or the at least one runner is bowed in the second configuration, and/or the at least one runner pushes the cuff radially outwardly when the at least one runner transitions from the first configuration to the second configuration, and/or the at least one runner is coupled to the cell so as to be disposed radially outward of the leaflets, and/or the at least one runner has first and second ends coupled to the cell, and/or the first end of the at least one runner is coupled to a first strut of the cell and the second end of the at least one runner is coupled to a second strut of the cell, and/or the first end of the at least one runner is coupled to a junction of a first two struts of the cell and the second end of the at least one runner is coupled to a junction of a second two struts of the cell, and/or the first strut is diagonally opposed to the second strut when the stent is in the collapsed condition, and/or the at least one runner is coupled to the cell at an attachment end, the at least one runner being wider at the attachment end than at its midpoint, and/or the at least one runner includes a first runner and a second runner coupled to the cell, and/or the first runner and the second runner are coupled together at their midpoints, and/or the stent has length direction between a proximal end and a distal end, and the at least one runner extends substantially in the length direction in the second configuration, and/or the at least one runner extends substantially in a circumferential direction of the stent in the second configuration.
In some embodiments, a prosthetic heart valve for replacing a native valve includes a stent including a plurality of struts forming cells, the stent having a collapsed condition and an expanded condition. A valve assembly is disposed within the stent, the valve assembly including a plurality of leaflets and a cuff. A nested strut is coupled to a cell, the nested strut being configured to transition from a first configuration to a second configuration when the stent moves from the collapsed condition to the expanded condition, the nested strut projecting radially outwardly from the cell in the second configuration.
In some examples, a nested strut may be substantially U-shaped in the collapsed condition, and/or the nested strut extends substantially in a circumferential direction of the stent in the second configuration.
The present application is a national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2015/015537 filed Feb. 12, 2015, published in English, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/941,024, filed Feb. 18, 2014, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/015537 | 2/12/2015 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/126712 | 8/27/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4275469 | Gabbay | Jun 1981 | A |
4491986 | Gabbay | Jan 1985 | A |
4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5935163 | Gabbay | Aug 1999 | A |
5961549 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6045576 | Starr et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6083257 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090140 | Gabbay | Jul 2000 | A |
6214036 | Letendre et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264691 | Gabbay | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267783 | Letendre et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6368348 | Gabbay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419695 | Gabbay | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488702 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517576 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533810 | Hankh et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6582464 | Gabbay | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610088 | Gabbay | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6685625 | Gabbay | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716244 | Klaco | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719789 | Cox | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6783556 | Gabbay | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790230 | Beyersdorf et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6869444 | Gabbay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6951573 | Dilling | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025780 | Gabbay | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7137184 | Schreck | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160322 | Gabbay | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195641 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7247167 | Gabbay | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267686 | DiMatteo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320704 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7374573 | Gabbay | May 2008 | B2 |
7381218 | Schreck | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7381219 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7452371 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524331 | Birdsall | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534261 | Friedman | May 2009 | B2 |
RE40816 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2009 | E |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7628805 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7708775 | Rowe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7731742 | Schlick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748389 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780725 | Haug et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799069 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824442 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837727 | Goetz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846203 | Cribier | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7846204 | Letac et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857845 | Stacchino et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7892281 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914569 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7959666 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959672 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972378 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988724 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016877 | Seguin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D648854 | Braido | Nov 2011 | S |
8048153 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052741 | Bruszewski et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052749 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052750 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062355 | Figulla et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075611 | Millwee et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D652926 | Braido | Jan 2012 | S |
D652927 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653341 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653342 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653343 | Ness et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D654169 | Braido | Feb 2012 | S |
D654170 | Braido et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8137398 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142497 | Friedman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
D660432 | Braido | May 2012 | S |
D660433 | Braido et al. | May 2012 | S |
D660967 | Braido et al. | May 2012 | S |
8182528 | Salahieh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8221493 | Boyle et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230717 | Matonick | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231670 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8252051 | Chau et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8308798 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313525 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323335 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8323336 | Hill et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343213 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348995 | Tuval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348996 | Tuval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348998 | Pintor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366769 | Huynh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403983 | Quadri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408214 | Spenser | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8414643 | Tuval et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425593 | Braido et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449599 | Chau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449604 | Moaddeb et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
D684692 | Braido | Jun 2013 | S |
8454686 | Alkhatib | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8500798 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568474 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579962 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579966 | Seguin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585755 | Chau et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591575 | Cribier | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597349 | Alkhatib | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603159 | Seguin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603160 | Salahieh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613765 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623074 | Ryan | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652204 | Quill et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663322 | Keranen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668733 | Haug et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685080 | White | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728154 | Alkhatib | May 2014 | B2 |
8747459 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764820 | Dehdashtian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795357 | Yohanan et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801776 | House et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808356 | Braido et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8828078 | Salahieh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834563 | Righini | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840661 | Manasse | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840663 | Salahieh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8876894 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8876895 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8940040 | Shahriari | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945209 | Bonyuet et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961595 | Alkhatib | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8974523 | Thill et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974524 | Yeung et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020036220 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030023303 | Palmaz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030130726 | Thorpe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040049262 | Obermiller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111111 | Lin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050043790 | Seguin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143809 | Salahieh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203605 | Dolan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256566 | Gabbay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008497 | Gabbay | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060122692 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161249 | Realyvasquez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173532 | Flagle et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178740 | Stacchino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195180 | Kheradvar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206202 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241744 | Beith | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241745 | Solem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276813 | Greenberg | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276874 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043435 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067029 | Gabbay | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093890 | Eliasen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100435 | Case et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118210 | Pinchuk | May 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233228 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244545 | Birdsall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288087 | Fearnot et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021552 | Gabbay | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039934 | Styrc | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082164 | Friedman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097595 | Gabbay | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114452 | Gabbay | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125853 | Bailey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140189 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147183 | Styrc | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154356 | Obermiller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080243245 | Thambar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255662 | Stacchino et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262602 | Wilk et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269879 | Sathe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090099653 | Suri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112309 | Jaramillo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138079 | Tuval et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090276027 | Glynn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036484 | Hariton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049306 | House et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087907 | Lattouf | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131055 | Case et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168778 | Braido | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168839 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168844 | Toomes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185277 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191326 | Alkhatib | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204781 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204785 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217382 | Chau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234940 | Dolan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249911 | Alkhatib | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249923 | Alkhatib | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110029072 | Gabbay | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054466 | Rothstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098800 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098802 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137397 | Chau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172765 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208283 | Rust | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264206 | Tabor | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120035722 | Tuval | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041550 | Salahieh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078347 | Braido et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101572 | Kovalsky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120303116 | Gorman, III et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130245753 | Alkhatib | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130274873 | Delaloye | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304200 | McLean et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140121763 | Duffy et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155997 | Braido | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140214159 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228946 | Chau et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277411 | Bortlein | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303719 | Cox et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324164 | Gross et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343671 | Yohanan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350668 | Delaloye et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350669 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
10121210 | Nov 2005 | DE |
202008009610 | Dec 2008 | DE |
0732088 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1000590 | May 2000 | EP |
1584306 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1598031 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1360942 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2537487 | Dec 2012 | EP |
3107496 | Jul 2018 | EP |
2850008 | Jul 2004 | FR |
2847800 | Oct 2005 | FR |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9716133 | May 1997 | WO |
9832412 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9913801 | Mar 1999 | WO |
01028459 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2001049213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
01056500 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2002036048 | May 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005062980 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005070343 | Aug 2005 | WO |
06073626 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007058857 | May 2007 | WO |
2009094188 | Jul 2009 | WO |
10008548 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010008549 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010096176 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010098857 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013037519 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013106585 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2015077274 | May 2015 | WO |
2015126712 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2015/015537 dated May 4, 2015. |
Buesseler et al., “Bowed Runners for Paravalvular Leak Protection,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/941,024, filed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Rohde, I., Masch, J.-M., Theisen-Kunde, D., Marczynski-Buhlow, M., Bombien Quaden, R., Lutter, G. and Brinkmann, R., “Resection of Calcified Aortic Heart Leaflets In Vitro by Q-Switched 2?μm Microsecond Laser Radiation”, Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 30, No. 2, Feb. 2015, pp. 157-162. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12481. |
Muñoz, Daniel Rodriguez, Carla Lazaro Rivera, and Jose Luis Zamorano Gomez, “Guidance of Treatment of Perivalvular Prosthetic Leaks”, Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 16, No. 1, Nov. 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Gössl and Rihal, “Percutaneous Treatment of Aortic and Mitral Valve Paravalvular Regurgitation”, Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 15, No. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Swiatkiewicz et al., “Percutaneous Closure of Mitral Perivalvular Leak”, Kardiologia Polska, vol. 67, No. 7, 2009, pp. 762-764. |
De Cicco, et al., “Aortic Valve Periprosthetic Leakage: Anatomic Observations and Surgical Results”, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 79, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 1480-1485. |
Heat Advisor, “Heart repairs without surgery. Minimally invasive procedures aim to correct valve leakage”, Sep. 2004, PubMed ID 15586429. |
“Transcatheter Umbrella Closure of Valvular and Paravalvular Leaks”, Hourihan et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov. 1992, pp. 1371-1377. |
Buellesfeld et al., “Treatment of Paravalvular Leaks Through Inverventional Techniques”, Multimedia Manual of Cardithoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiology, Ben University Hospital, Jan. 2011. |
Braido et al., “Surgical Stent Assembly,” Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,243, filed Sep. 20, 2010. |
“Catheter-Implanted Prosthetic Heart Valves: Transluminal Catheter Implantation of a New Expandable Artificial Heart Valve in the Descending Thoracic Aorta In Isolated Vessels and Closed Chest Pigs”, Knudsen et al., The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 16, No. 5, May 1993, pp. 253-262. |
“Transluminal Aortic Valve Placement. A Feasability Study with a Newly Designed Collapsible Aortic Valve”, Moazami et al., ASAIO Journal, vol. 42, No. 5, 1996, pp. M381-M385. |
“Transluminal Catheter Implanted Prosthetic Heart Valves”, Andersen, H. R., International Journal of Angiology, vol. 7, No. 2, Mar. 1998, pp. 102-106. |
“Transluminal Implantation of Artificial Heart Valves”, Andersen, H. R., et al., European Heart Journal, vol. 13, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 704-708. |
Is It Reasonable to Treat All Calcified Stenotic Aortic Valves With a Valved Stent?, 579-584, Zegdi, Rachid, MD, PhD et al., J. of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 51, No. 5, Feb. 5, 2008. |
“Direct-Access Valve Replacement”, Christoph H. Huber, et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, No. 2, (Jul. 19, 2005). |
“Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde From the Femoral Artery”, John G. Webb et al., Circulation, 2006; 113:842-850 (Feb. 6, 2006). |
“Minimally invasive cardiac surgery”, M. J. Mack, Surgical Endoscopy, 2006, 20:S488-S492, DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-0110-8 (presented Apr. 24, 2006). |
“Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Humans”, Samuel V. Lichtenstein et al., Circulation. 2006; 114:591-596 (Jul. 31, 2006). |
“Closed Heart Surgery: Back to the Future”, Samuel V. Lichtenstein, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 131, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 941-943. |
“Transapical Approach for Sutureless Stent-Fixed Aortic Valve Implantation: Experimental Results”, Th. Walther et al., European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 29, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 703-708. |
“Transapical aortic valve implantation: an animal feasibility study”; Todd M. Dewey et al., The annals of thoracic surgery 2006; 82: 110-6 (Feb. 13, 2006). |
Transcatheter Valve Repair, Hijazi et al., CRC Press, Jan. 2006, pp. 165-186. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170165053 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61941024 | Feb 2014 | US |