This invention is directed to the field of archery, and more specifically to compound bows of the type employing cams and control cables to achieve a programmed draw weight, and the latter being variable with draw length. Applicant incorporates by reference prior U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,148 and other patents referred to in that document, that is, archery bows that have cams and power cords, and are programmed for optimal draw weight characteristics.
Typically, compound bows have means to regulate their draw weight so that a maximum pull weight is attained at an intermediate draw position, and with the draw weight dropping to some fraction of maximum pull weight at the full draw position.
It is also an objective of modern bows and crossbows to transfer to the bolt or arrow as much as possible of the energy that is stored in the bow, so that the projectile will fly faster and farther for a given draw weight. These goals have been difficult to achieve. Some inefficiencies are due to mechanical losses in the crossover strings and pulley mechanisms.
Unlike the prior designs, the present invention does not obtain the maximum draw weight at a partial draw position and then drop off draw weight at the full draw position. Instead, the bow or crossbow is designed so that draw weight increases continuously to full draw. This characteristic is required in some forms of long bow archery, and is useful in crossbow archery, because the crossbow has a mechanical release that holds the bowstring at full draw. Because the crossbow does not have to allow for drop-off of pull weight, there is no need for synchronizing cords or strings, and no need for cross-over strings.
Accordingly, compound bow or crossbow of this invention employs bowstring cams with bowstring cam grooves and power cord cam grooves (either a single power cord cam groove or more preferably a pair of generally identical power cord cam grooves positioned axially above and below the bowstring cam groove). The power cords are anchored to a fixed anchor point, e.g., a pylon, on the near end of the riser or on the near side of the crossbow bar or stock. The power cords do not cross over to the other limb. The reduction in the number of cam wheels and pulleys and in the number of strings or cords results in greater efficiency (due to smaller mechanical losses) and higher transfer of energy from the bow to the arrow or bolt. The bolt or arrow accelerates throughout the travel of the bowstring, resulting in significantly higher velocity.
The invention is explained in terms of a possible preferred embodiment, here a crossbow 10, in which there is an axial beam or stock 12 defining a medial plane with a riser 14 extending transversely at a front or distal end thereof. At each end of the riser 14 there is a power limb or spring limb 16, i.e., a spring limb at the right end of the riser and one at the left end. Each spring limb 16 has one end anchored to the riser and at its other end a pivot 18 in which a respective cam wheel 20 is supported. In this embodiment, the spring limbs 16 are formed of an upper portion and a lower portion, with the cam wheel 20 held in between them.
Note that in a crossbow, the riser extends horizontally or transversely, while in a long bow the riser extends vertically. The mechanics of operation are the same in either orientation.
A bow string 22 is attached to each bowstring cam 20 and rides in a peripheral bowstring groove or channel 24 in each of these cams. In this invention there are no synchronizing pulleys nor any crossover cables. At each limb there are a pair of power cables 26 are reeved to respective power cable cam grooves 28a and 28b that are coaxial with the associated bowstring cam groove 24, and are situated axially above and below the same. These cam grooves 24, 28a and 28b are shown in relation to the axle 30 of the cam wheel 20 (See
Also shown here is a traveling string release 34 mounted on a track on the top of the beam 12. This release can closed over the bow string and then cranked back to a full draw position by means of a screw or pulley mechanism (not shown). Many other cocking devices are possible. Also a finger trigger mechanism 36 is shown at a handle end of the stock.
While the invention has been described and illustrated in respect to a selected preferred embodiment, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited only to that precise embodiment. Rather, many modifications and variations would present themselves to those of skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention, as defined in the appended claims.
Applicant claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/356,109, filed Jun. 18, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4169456 | Van House | Oct 1979 | A |
4457288 | Ricord | Jul 1984 | A |
4465054 | Nishioka | Aug 1984 | A |
4593674 | Kudlacek | Jun 1986 | A |
4649890 | Powers | Mar 1987 | A |
4649891 | Bozek | Mar 1987 | A |
4667649 | Humphrey | May 1987 | A |
4683865 | Troncoso | Aug 1987 | A |
4757799 | Bozek | Jul 1988 | A |
4781168 | Lester | Nov 1988 | A |
4917071 | Bozek | Apr 1990 | A |
5388564 | Islas | Feb 1995 | A |
5678528 | Hadley | Oct 1997 | A |
6067974 | Islas | May 2000 | A |
6082346 | Andrews et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098607 | Strother | Aug 2000 | A |
6470870 | Schaar | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474324 | Despart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6776148 | Islas | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792931 | Schaar | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7578289 | Norkus | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637256 | Lee | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7823572 | Anderson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7891348 | Colley | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8037876 | Yehle | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8387603 | Darlington | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20060169260 | Chang | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080127956 | Bednar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080251058 | Colley | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110041820 | Stanziale | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110308508 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61356109 | Jun 2010 | US |