This invention relates generally to boxes. In particular, the invention relates to a box having hand holes and a spacer panel defining recesses behind the hand holes for insertion of the fingers to facilitate lifting and carrying of the box. In a specific embodiment the box is a carton designed to hold multiple reams of cut sheets of paper.
Conventional boxes and cartons are normally picked up and carried by placing the hands under the bottom of the box or carton, or sometimes by grasping straps wrapped around the box when straps are present. Conventional cartons designed for holding cut sheets of paper are formed of corrugated cardboard and typically hold 10 wrapped reams of 500 sheets each. These cartons of paper weigh 50 pounds or more, depending upon the bond rating of the paper. For example, a single ream of standard 20 lb. bond paper weighs 5 pounds and a single ream of 24 lb. bond paper weighs 6 pounds, whereby a carton of 10 reams of 20 lb. bond paper weighs 50 pounds and a carton of 10 reams of 24 lb. bond paper weighs 60 pounds. These boxes are relatively heavy and difficult to handle by most consumers.
Some conventional boxes and cartons have hand holes in opposed walls to facilitate lifting and carrying of them, but there is no spacer panel defining recesses behind the hand holes to provide space for insertion of the fingers through the hand holes. Cartons holding cut sheets of paper normally do not have hand holes in them.
Consumers wishing to purchase one or more cartons of paper typically either order the paper to be delivered to their home or office location, or go to a point of sale to acquire the paper. In the former instance, even after the carton has been delivered to their location, the consumer generally either has to lift the carton of paper and carry it to its point of use, or lift the carton onto a cart for transport to the point of use and then again lift the carton to remove it from the cart. In the latter instance, when the consumer drives to a point of sale to acquire the paper, the consumer either has to lift and carry the carton to check-out, or select a shopping cart and push the cart to where the cartons of paper are displayed, then lift the carton into the cart and push the cart to check-out. After purchase, the consumer again has to lift the carton of paper to remove it from the cart and place it in his or her vehicle. Upon reaching their destination, the consumer again has to lift the carton to remove it from the vehicle and either carry the carton into his or her home or office or place it on a cart to transport it to its point of use. This multiple lifting of the relatively heavy cartons of paper from a variety of carts, dollies and shopping carts increases the possibility for personal injury to the consumer.
Container handling is the third largest source of injury and illness in the private sector and is the largest source of injury and illness in the retail trade. Boxes of photocopy paper are among the heaviest items that employees are required to lift in the office. Data indicates that manual material handling (MMH) is among the most frequent and severe causes of injury worldwide, and 35%-40% of workplace injury costs are related to MMH, with 1.8 million U.S. workers experiencing work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD's) each year.
Manual handling issues that affect the ease and safety of the lift include: weight of the object; horizontal location of the object; vertical location of the object; vertical travel distance; asymmetry/twisting; frequency; duration; coupling; posture; and if mechanical contact stress is present.
It would be advantageous to have a container, especially a container for cut sheets of paper, wherein the container has hand holes in the sides with space for inserting the fingers through the hand holes, to facilitate lifting and carrying of the container and thereby minimize the incidences of injury that occur with conventional containers.
In a preferred embodiment the box of the invention comprises a standard corrugated paper carton having a bottom wall, opposite side walls, opposite end walls, and a removable lid or cover, and is designed to hold 10 reams of paper, but it should be understood that the principles of the invention could be applied to containers made of other materials and having other capacities and designed for other goods.
The carton of the invention has hand holes in its opposite ends and a spacer panel with cut outs in its opposite ends is inserted between the reams of paper with the cut outs positioned behind the hand holes to provide clearance for the fingers when they are inserted through the hand holes. The fingers then engage beneath superjacent reams of paper to exert force against the paper to lift the carton.
In a preferred embodiment the cut outs in the ends of the spacer panel are shaped to minimize damage to adjacent sheets of paper, and a punch-out foldable panel is provided in the hand holes to close them until they are used to lift the carton.
Although the carton has been described as holding 10 reams of paper, it should be understood that the invention is applicable to cartons holding a different number of cut sheets of paper, or to cartons for holding other objects and which have a weight that makes them difficult to handle in a conventional manner.
The hand holes allow the user to lift a carton from the floor without having to get his or her hands completely under the carton, thereby reducing the extent to which the user has to bend over to lift the carton. The hand holes also provide secure grip and control of the carton, enabling it to be easily maneuvered and cleanly lifted and carried, thus limiting the risk of product damage and injury to the user due to accidentally dropping the carton. Further, the hand holes allow the carton to be fully placed before releasing it, thus limiting the risk of product damage and injury to the user due to intentional dropping.
The foregoing, as well as other objects and advantages of the invention, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference characters designate like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
Referring more specifically to the drawings, a carton according to the invention is indicated generally at 10 in
In accordance with the invention, the carton 10 has hand holes 30 and 31 cut in its opposite ends, respectively, and a spacer panel 40 is inserted in the carton between the layers of reams of paper 20. A cut out or recess 41 is formed in each end of the panel 40 and the panel is positioned so that these cut outs are behind and in registry with the respective hand holes 30 and 31. When the carton contains reams of paper 20, the spacer panel and cut outs provide room for inserting the fingers between the reams of paper so that lifting force can be exerted against superjacent reams to lift the carton. The panel 40 can comprise a sheet of honeycomb material or other material to provide the necessary space for inserting the fingers. In a preferred embodiment, the panel 40 has a thickness of about one inch and each of the cut outs 41 has a width of about four inches and a depth of from about three inches to about four and one-half inches at its deepest point. The cut outs 30 and 31 preferably have a width of about four inches and a height of about one and one-half inches. The spacer panel has width and length dimensions to fit within the interior width and length dimensions of the carton and reinforces the carton to reduce damage when the carton is dropped.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Cut outs of alternate shape are shown in the spacer panel 60 of
Revised National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Guidelines were used to quantify the differences between a conventional 10-ream carton and an 8-ream and a 10-ream carton having hand holes and a spacer panel according to the invention. See
As shown in
The lifting index scores for cartons made according to the invention were significantly less. As shown in
Drop tests were conducted with ten 8½″×11″ reams of Hammermill Copy Plus 20 lb copy paper produced at the International Paper Company Sumter Mill in Sumter, S.C. Five cases were drop tested six times, once on each package face. Five additional cases were drop tested seven times, once on each package face and once on a corner. The packages were conditioned at 73° F./50% RH for 24 hours prior to testing.
Prior to testing, the cases were labeled to identify the exterior surfaces or faces of the package. Corresponding with the package top, the following identification was consistent for all units tested.
Face 1=Top of Ream Package
Face 2=Length panel of Ream Package
Face 3=Bottom of Ream Package
Face 4=Opposite Length panel of Ream Package
Face 5=Width panel of Ream Package
Face 6=Opposite Width panel of Ream Package
Five sample packages were dropped six times from a height of 12 inches in the following format:
Drop 1−Face 2 Length
Drop 2−Face 4 Length
Drop 3−Face 3 Bottom
Drop 4−Face 6 Width
Drop 5−Face 1 Top
Drop 6−Face 5 Width
Five sample packages were dropped seven times from a height of 12 inches in the following format:
Drop 1−Face 2 Length
Drop 2−Face 4 Length
Drop 3−Face 3 Bottom
Drop 4−Face 6 Width
Drop 5−Face 1 Top
Drop 6−Face 5 Width
Drop 7−Corner 2-3-5
A honeycomb spacer panel was placed between the second and third paper layers (as counted from the bottom of the package) within each case. The honeycomb spacer panel aligned with the case hand holes along the case width. The samples were banded for this testing.
Once drop tested, the paper ream tears were rated according to the Ream Damage rating table below. Generally, the longer the tear the greater the damage (severity) value.
The tables below summarize the ream tear results.
As can be seen, the severity of tear was substantially reduced when either a ¾ inch spacer panel or a 1 inch spacer panel was placed in the carton according to the invention. When a 1 inch thick spacer panel was placed in the carton according to the invention the average number of reams torn was substantially reduced in both the six drop series and the seven drop series, and the severity of tear was reduced in the six drop series.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described in detail herein, it should be understood that various changes and modifications may be made in the invention without departing from the spirit and intent of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1199790 | Holcomb | Oct 1916 | A |
1647581 | Redemski | Nov 1927 | A |
2257977 | Richard | Oct 1941 | A |
2716558 | Sullivan | Aug 1955 | A |
2805077 | Katz | Sep 1957 | A |
3042461 | Smith | Jul 1962 | A |
3086690 | Beck | Apr 1963 | A |
3135527 | Knapp | Jun 1964 | A |
3198300 | Tuttle | Aug 1965 | A |
3302955 | Witzgall | Feb 1967 | A |
3337285 | Travis | Aug 1967 | A |
3487479 | Grooms | Jan 1970 | A |
3492016 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3593387 | Georgi | Jul 1971 | A |
3680810 | Jarmalow | Aug 1972 | A |
3853285 | Woodring | Dec 1974 | A |
3954226 | Pickering | May 1976 | A |
3982613 | Wood | Sep 1976 | A |
4058250 | Akkerman | Nov 1977 | A |
4060252 | Mowery | Nov 1977 | A |
4068779 | Canfield | Jan 1978 | A |
4128253 | Powers | Dec 1978 | A |
4311288 | Galland | Jan 1982 | A |
4416429 | Jessamine | Nov 1983 | A |
4772035 | Danial | Sep 1988 | A |
4940252 | Seib | Jul 1990 | A |
4969610 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5284247 | Turner | Feb 1994 | A |
5316210 | Scullin | May 1994 | A |
5356031 | Jondelius | Oct 1994 | A |
5403023 | Tsai | Apr 1995 | A |
5445396 | Sebor | Aug 1995 | A |
5551715 | Pickard | Sep 1996 | A |
5709008 | Dickinson | Jan 1998 | A |
5898472 | Oshikawa | Apr 1999 | A |
5927450 | Sadow | Jul 1999 | A |
6199879 | Cino et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244502 | Hollar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6979005 | McLerran | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983946 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7249729 | Moritz | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7431235 | Moritz | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7845894 | Dickinson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8205399 | Ralston | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010038778 | Tatina | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050006861 | Dubois et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050269791 | Hoiriis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100001054 | Brittain | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100147642 | Andochick | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120223129 | Oppenheimer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
008447 | Aug 2006 | AT |
20202320 | May 2002 | DE |
20316226 | Mar 2004 | DE |
0009921 | Apr 1980 | EP |
0410772 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0519366 | Dec 1992 | EP |
1375362 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2741852 | Nov 1995 | FR |
2865446 | Jan 2004 | FR |
2898341 | Sep 2007 | FR |
372119 | May 1932 | GB |
1480726 | Jul 1977 | GB |
2471309 | Dec 2010 | GB |
9419642 | Sep 1994 | WO |
2009027992 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009046775 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2010033029 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140061080 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61724457 | Nov 2012 | US | |
61599600 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2013/026404 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14076345 | US |