Snap-on closures are characterized in that they can snap in a bistable manner between an open state and a closed state. They generally consist of a disc-shaped top wall which is deformable in a bistable manner between a concave first state and a convex second state, and an annular edge portion. The outer periphery of the annular edge portion decreases upon transition of the top wall from the first state to the second state.
Such snap-on closures used to be made of metal only and were marketed by Hoffmann Neopac as merchandising products under the brands Klick-Klack® and Klipp-Klapp®. In patent documents DE 10 2015 103 036 B4 and WO 2017/076398 A1 it is described how such snap-on closures can now also be made of plastics. The most important aspect for the functioning of the snap mechanism is the transfer of the bistable deformation of the top wall to the adjacent annular edge portion. Only if the flipping-over movement between the convex and the concave curvature of the top wall transfers its deformation stress to the edge portion, this allows for a widening of the edge portion and a corresponding enlargement of the outer circumference of the closure cap, which then also allows for opening the container covered by the cap. Here it is of central importance that the angle included at the transition between the top wall and the edge portion remains the same for both bistable states, i.e. that the closure cap material at this transition region is stiff enough to transfer the deformation stress of the top wall completely to the edge portion.
In addition, the edge portion itself should be sufficiently flexible to allow its outer periphery to widen in the first bistable state of the top wall which is curved in the direction of attachment. According to DE 10 2015 103 036 B4, this is achieved, for example, by the fact that folds are formed at the edge portion which unfold in the first state and thus allow the outer circumference to be enlarged. Then the entire cover can be made of a single plastic material with homogeneous density or elasticity. Preferably, however, the edge portion obtains the necessary elasticity by forming at least one expansion portion in the edge portion of the cover from a softer material component than the remaining edge portion (see WO 2017/076398 A1). The expansion portion expands elastically under stress and allows the edge portion to expand into a concave curvature state, while the base material of the cover is otherwise stiff enough to maintain a constant angle in the transition region between the top wall and the edge portion. This allows the cover to be folded over into the bistable state with the larger outer circumference.
The expansion portion is preferably manufactured in one piece together with the rest of the cover using a multi-component injection molding process. A second material component is injected for the expansion portion. The second material component is softer and/or more elastic than the first material component used for the rest of the cover. In order to further support the constant angle in the transition region between the top wall and the edge portion, the cover in this transition region may also preferably have a higher material thickness of the harder (base) material component than in the main region of the top wall or be injected by use of an even harder third material component. This yields the particular advantage that the overall thickness of the cover material may remain constant. A homogeneous thickness is not only visually appealing, but also reduces the number of steps and edges in which dirt can accumulate.
A design in which a latching ring made of the softer second material component is molded onto the entire inner and/or outer circumference of the edge portion is particularly preferred. This latching ring can seal a groove or a step in the side wall of the opening to be closed, so that even a sealing closure of the opening is possible.
There is still room for improvement in the presently available plastic snap-on closures with regard to the user's operation of the flipping-over process. Until now, it has been mandatory to press or pull up the cover with a certain minimum force at its edge portion or at a handle member formed on its top wall in order to allow the top wall to snap from one bistable state to the other. This has the disadvantage that the areas on which the user is to exert his force must always be sufficiently exposed in order to reach the desired pressure points with the fingers. This, in turn, undesirably restricts the design possibilities for the overall closure system consisting of container and cover. On the other hand, it would be desirable to reduce the minimum force required for the snap-action process if the user applies the force at precisely predefined pressure points. It would also be advantageous if none of the snap-action states would be exclusively operable by a pulling force, because then there would no longer be any necessity to provide a (two-hand-operated) handle member on the cover.
Accordingly, the object of the present invention is to provide, in a closure system consisting of a three-dimensional structure with the opening to be closed and a cover which snaps between two states in a bistable manner, more possibilities for the user to trigger the snap-over process and, preferably, to reduce the minimum force required for the triggering operation. In particular, a closure system is desirable in which both bistable states can be triggered by manual pressing, so that both snap-open processes can be operated without a handle member and usually with just one hand.
At least a partial solution to the above-mentioned problem is achieved by the features of present claim 1. The subclaims relate to preferred embodiments.
In accordance with the present invention, the three-dimensional structure, in particular a container or a tubing end which is open on at least one side, is configured in such a way that a force acting on the closure system from outside at at least one predefined location is transferred to the edge portion of the cover in such a way that the cover is snapped from one bistable state to the other.
In the case of a lid clamping from inside against an opening wall, the opening wall of the three-dimensional structure is preferably flexible at least at the predefined location in such a way that, by elastic deformation, a force acting on the opening wall at least on one side, and preferably on both sides, transversely to the direction of attachment is transmitted to the edge portion of the lid. This allows the lid to lie completely within the opening to be closed without the need for the user to provide a handle member on the top wall of the lid to trigger the snap-over process into the open position. In a particularly preferable embodiment, the point of the opening wall which is, opposite to the direction of attachment, most remote projects by a certain amount of projection from the location at which the edge portion of the lid presses from the inside against the wall region. A force acting transversely to the direction of attachment on this outer wall region can then trigger the snapping-over of the cover with less effort, because the protrusion acts as a lever arm.
According to another preferred embodiment, the cover clamps as a cap from the outside around the wall region of the opening to be closed. The geometric design of the wall region of the opening at the outermost end region in the direction opposite to the direction of attachment allows the cap to contact this end region with an area of the top wall that is a little offset from the edge portion towards the center of the cap. This allows the cap to be brought into its closed position not only by a force acting transversely to the direction of attachment on the edge portion, but also by a force exerted in the direction of attachment, provided that this force is exerted on a pressure point which is radially further outwards than the contact point of the opening wall with the top wall. The distance between the contact-point and the pressure-point here again works as lever arm and reduces the required operating force correspondingly.
In this description, the closure element of the opening to be closed is generally referred to as a cover. If the cover clamps on the outside of the opening wall, the cover is called a cap; if the cover clamps on the inside against the opening wall, it is called a lid.
In the following, the invention is explained in greater detail using several embodiments. Therein shows:
In the first embodiment shown in
The cap 20 shown in
If the top wall 21 snaps into its concave and downwardly (i.e. in the direction of attachment) curved state, the outer circumference of the edge portion 22 increases. In order to keep the angle μ, which is included by the top wall 21 and the edge portion 22 in their transition region, constant in the two bistable states, the cap material should have sufficient rigidity. According to the invention, this is achieved by the fact that the transition region between the top wall 21 and the edge portion 22 has, at least in partial regions, but preferably over the entire circumference, a higher material thickness than the central region of the top wall 21. As shown in
The outer circumference in the concave bistable state (explained later on referring to
The edge portion 22 terminates in its expansion portions 24 as well as in its intermediate portions 23 in a latching ring 29 which is provided at the inner circumference and which is also formed from a softer material component, preferably the same as the expansion portions 24. This inner circumferential latching ring 29 imparts additional dimensional stability to the thin-walled cap 20, but is also sufficiently elastic to enable the enlargement of the outer circumference in the convex foldover position shown in
The latching ring 29 is formed on a lip portion 23a, 24a of the edge portion 22, the lip portion projecting radially inwards by 90°. The reason for this is that the cap 20 should grip the opening 11a to be closed from the outside, as will be explained in greater detail in
As a manufacturing process for the cap 20, the above-mentioned multi-component injection molding using one or more thermoplastics is particularly suitable. The multi-component technique allows a first (base) component to be injected for the top wall 21 and the intermediate portions 23, while the expansion portions 24, as well as the latching ring 29, are directly injected from a softer second component in a single manufacturing process. The optional third (particularly hard) material component for the transition region between the top wall and the edge portion can also be injection-molded directly in a single multicomponent injection molding process.
Preferred materials for the first component are: thermoplastic elastomers (TPE) and thermoplastic urethane (TPU).
Preferred materials for the second component are: Polycarbonate (PC), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polystyrene (PS).
Preferred materials for the third component are: glass fiber reinforced polyamide (PA) or other glass fiber reinforced plastics.
Instead of producing the cover entirely by injection molding, it is also possible to overmold a blank obtained previously in a separate manufacturing step. It is conceivable, for example, that a cap which is made of sheet metal or a light metal (e.g. aluminum) and which essentially has the shape of a conventional Klick-Klack box cap with metal fingers at the outer periphery, could be encapsulated in the edge area with the softer (second) plastic component. The obtained result is a cover with significantly improved tightness against the leakage of liquids or gases from the box to be closed.
Instead of manufacturing the cap or lid from several material components of different hardness or elasticity, the cap or lid can also be manufactured by a thermoforming process, i.e. deep drawing, or by an injection molding process from only a single plastic material. Then, instead of the softer expansion portions at the edge portion, the above-mentioned folds are formed and reinforcement ribs and/or material thickenings are provided at the transition region between the top wall and the edge portion to keep the inner angle there constant in both bistable states.
In
As can be seen particularly well in
As also shown in
According to another modification shown in
According to another modification shown in
The only difference to cap 20 is that the lid 30 does not have an inwardly protruding latching ring 29, but an outwardly protruding latching ring 39. This is because it is not intended to clamp to the container wall from the outside, but from the inside. Another conceivable option is, of course, a cover with both an inwardly and an outwardly projecting latching ring, which can then be used as both a cap and a cover. Furthermore, it would also be possible to place the lid 30 upside down on the box 10b without significantly changing its functionality. The middle section of the edge portion 32 would then not extend in the direction of attachment but also opposite thereto, and the cover 30 would change from its closed state to its open state by exerting a pressure on the top wall 31 in the direction of attachment, which can be advantageous for certain applications.
The edge portion 32 thus ends both in its expansion portions (not shown) and in its intermediate portions 33 in an outer circumferential latching ring 39. The latching ring is also formed from a softer material component, preferably the same material as the expansion portions. This circumferential latching ring 39 not only gives the thin-walled lid 30 additional dimensional stability, but is also sufficiently elastic to enable the enlargement of the outer circumference in the convex folding position shown in
The wall region 12b of the opening 11a to be closed has a ring-shaped groove 13b inside, into which the lid 30 is to engage, and which forms a step-shaped shoulder 15b at its lower edge. The area of the wall region 12b above the groove 13b (i.e. against the direction of attachment) is referred to as the protrusion 14b.
If the lid 30 is inserted from above into the opening 11b, the edge portion 32 hits with its latching ring 39 against the step 15b. This tells the user that the axial end position of the cover 30 has been reached which is the end position intended for locking. If the user now presses the top wall 31 downwards by a force F acting vertically downwards, the top wall 31 snaps from its convex bistable state shown in
To uncover the opening 11b again, the lid 30 must snap back into its original state. It can then be pulled out of the opening 11b due to its reduced outer diameter. Conventionally, a handle member on the top wall 31 was provided for this purpose. By the handle member, the lid 30 could be seized and pulled upwards. As described in detail below, the second embodiment of the present invention also allows the lid to be opened with a force F4, F5 acting laterally (transversely to the direction of attachment) on the container wall 12b, so that the handle member can be dispensed with.
As can be seen best in the enlarged representation of
As shown in
The other end of the slider 13c meets the end of an edge portion extension 34 protruding in the direction of attachment from the edge portion 32 inside the container 10b. The extension 34 can be attached to or integrally formed with the edge portion 32 in partial areas or over the entire circumference. In the modification shown, the extension essentially has a length b3 and is thus longer than the edge portion 32 as such. The extension 34 acts as a lever arm of the length b3 up to the transition region between edge portion 32 and top wall 31.
If the slider 13c is pushed inwards with the minimum force F5′ at the actuator 13d, the extension 34 is moved such far into the interior of the container that it transfers, to the top wall 31 via the lever arm b3, the torque necessary for switching into the open bistable state. The same force F5′ when acting on the remaining wall region 12b would not be sufficient for opening of the cover 30—for example, because the wall thickness or strength of the container wall is large enough to make force transmission to the edge portion extension 34 sufficiently difficult. This additionally increases safety against any unintentional opening of the box-lid system.
As shown in the third modification of the second embodiment in
In summary, the present invention relates to a closure system with a three-dimensional structure 10a, 10b, in particular a container or an opening region of a technical apparatus, and a cover 20, 30 for fitting onto the three-dimensional structure 10a, 10b in order to close its opening 11a, 11b. The cover 20, 30 has a top wall 21, 31 which is deformable in a bistable manner between a first state curved in the direction of attachment and a second state curved opposite to the direction of attachment, and an annular edge portion 22, 32. The edge portion has a larger outer circumference in the first bistable state than in the second bistable state and is therefore adapted to effect a clamping attachment of the cover 20, 30 to a wall region 12a, 12b of the opening 11a, 11b by the edge portion 22, 32 pressing against the wall region 12a, 12b in the first state from inside or pressing against the wall region 12a, 12b in the second state from outside. The three-dimensional structure 10a, 10b is configured to transfer a force exerted on the closure system at predefined locations A2, B2 from the outside in such a way that it leads to a snapping of the cover 20, 30 from one to the other of the two bistable states.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2018 103 730.7 | Jun 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2019/100598 | 6/27/2019 | WO | 00 |