1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the field of slatted bed frames. More particularly, the invention relates to a bracket for securing a spring slat to a slatted base frame.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
In beds with a slatted bed base, the slats may provide a spring function. Such spring slats are connected to the frame of the slatted base by inserting each of the two ends of the spring slat into cap-like mounting brackets. These mounting brackets are arranged on the opposing long sides of the frame of a slatted base and are open on the face that is toward the middle of the frame, so that the ends of the spring slat may be inserted into the brackets.
A disadvantage of the conventional method of securing slats in a slatted base frame is that the mounting bracket has to be wider than the slats and that, therefore, the slats must be placed a minimum distance apart that corresponds to the dimension of the mounting bracket that is wider than the slat.
The object of the invention is to improve on the conventional mounting bracket, such that two adjacent spring slats may be placed closer together.
The invention proposes not to surround the spring slat with the mounting bracket, but rather, to insert the mounting bracket into a plug opening in the spring slat and, in this way, to fasten the spring slat to the mounting bracket. The mounting bracket may now be constructed to be either narrower or the same width as the spring slat, without protruding beyond the width of the spring slat, thus making it possible to arrange two adjacent spring slats very close together.
It is now possible, in some areas of the slatted base where an especially strong support is desired, to arrange the spring slats more densely, that is, closer to one another, without having to use special spring slats, for example, harder spring slats, to achieve this greater support. Instead, the same type of spring slats may be used in the entire slatted base and the spring slats may be arranged particularly close together only in the area where greater support is desired.
The mounting bracket according to the invention may be constructed as a comparatively narrow piece, which means that the manufacturing costs may be lower than those for a larger mounting bracket that surrounds the spring slat. As a consequence, the mounting bracket as proposed may be produced quite economically.
Advantageously, the plug opening may be constructed to extend through the spring slat, that is, through the entire material thickness of the spring slat, so that a mounting bracket may be used that has a plug that extends through the entire spring slat. Thus, for example, plugs that widen upwards like mushrooms may be used, so that a proper snap-on connection between plug and slat may be achieved, thereby securing the spring slat against forces that tend to push it away from the plug. Pushing the plug all the way through the spring slat also enables a quick visual check to confirm that the spring slat is correctly fastened to the mounting bracket. Furthermore, the spring slat may be produced very economically, because blind bores created with an undercut are no longer necessary, if plugs having mushroom-like contours are to be used.
Advantageously, two or more plug openings may be arranged adjacent one another across the width of the spring slat, for example, directly next to each other, or may be offset with respect to the length of the spring slat. In any case, having several plug openings next to each other over the width of the spring slat increases the amount of opening in the surface of the spring slat, which facilitates optimum sleeping comfort due to the good ventilation of a mattress that lies on such spring slats in the slatted base.
If two plug openings are provided next to each other, the mounting bracket may, advantageously, also be equipped with two plugs, so that a plug extends into each of the two plug openings. This ensures correct positioning of the spring slat, when connecting the slat to the bracket in the course of assembling the slatted base. If the mounting bracket were to have only one single plug, then it would be possible to use the wrong opening of the two plug openings, which would place the spring slat in misalignment.
Advantageously, the spring slat on the mounting bracket may be moveable, so that, for example, the spring slat is able deflect downward, depending upon the weight being exerted on the spring slat. In an unloaded state, the spring slats are normally arranged in the slatted base with an upward curve. When pushed into a downward curve, considerable tractive force would be exerted on the mounting bracket, if the connection between the spring slat and the mounting bracket did not allow for relative movement. In order to construct the mounting bracket as inexpensively as possible and to rid it as much as possible from such stresses, the plug opening may be constructed to extend beyond the length plug in the longitudinal direction of the spring slat, toward the end of the spring slat.
Advantageously, movement of the slat relative the mounting bracket may be restricted in the opposite direction, that is, in case of an upward deflection of the slat. This is achieved by providing a stop limit in the plug opening in the direction toward the middle of the spring slat, so as to prevent a relative movement between the plug opening and the plug. When a number of spring slats are arranged on the frame, these stops in the spring slats ensure that all spring slats are centered on the frame. This gives, first of all, a good optical impression of the slatted frame, and, secondly, it facilitates assembling the slatted base into a bedframe, because hindrances, such as, spring slats that project too far and overhang the bedframe, are avoided.
Characteristic of the mounting bracket according to the invention is a plug is retained in a plug opening of a spring slat, and that the spring slat is fastened to the mounting bracket in this way.
The mounting bracket may be manufactured very inexpensively as a plastic injection-molded part. The entire mounting bracket may be made entirely of the same material. Alternatively, however, the mounting bracket may be manufactured using the so-called two-component or multi-component injection molding process. In such a case, the mounting bracket may have rigid and flexible areas made of two or more different materials.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
It is understood that the construction of the mounting bracket 1 may have to be adapted to the slatted base frame, depending on the particular construction of the slatted base frame. So, for example, instead of the bearing stub 2 that is shown in the figures, differently constructed fastening means may be provided. It may also be possible to eliminate the connecting plate 4, if, for example, the mounting bracket 1 is to be fastened directly to the top side of the base frame. In that case, a bearing stub constructed similarly to the bearing stub 2 may be provided on the underside of the base plate 3, so that it extends downward from the base plate 3.
Two plugs 5 are arranged on the base plate 3. These plugs 5 extend upward from respective plug bases 6 that are mounted or formed on the base plate 3. The plug bases 6 serve to optimally support the plug 5 against shear forces. A rib 7 is provided on an upper area of the plug 5, on the long side, so that the plug 5 has a comparatively wide head region, to provide a forced fit in the spring slat, to secure it against forces working to lift the slat off the plug. The material for the plug 5 has a certain elasticity, which enables it to be insertable through a plug opening in the spring slat that is narrower than the head region on the plug.
In the shown embodiment, the mounting bracket 1 is as a single injection-molded plastic piece. Thus, the head region with the ribs 7, the entire plug 5 including the socket 6, and the entire mounting bracket 1 are made of the same material. Alternatively, however, the mounting bracket 1 may be produced in a well-known manner using the so-called two-component or multi-component injection molding. In this case, the mounting bracket 1 may have rigid and flexible regions made of two or more different materials, so that the head region with the ribs 7, for example, may be made to be more flexible than the socket 6.
The plugs 5 may also be constructed in a way that deviates from the shown embodiment. For example, the plug 5 may have a round cross section instead of an oblong one, and two or more plugs may be arranged in a row, that is, one behind the other in the longitudinal direction of the spring slat that is to be secured.
Further movement of the spring slat 8 in relation to the mounting bracket 1 is not possible, however, in the opposite direction. The expanded lower cross sections of the plug openings 9 are limited in length and are shorter than the aforementioned slots 10, so that they create a stop that limits further movement plug bases 6 when the spring slat 8 is moved relative to the mounting bracket 1 in such a direction that the gap between the end of the spring slat 8 that is visible in the drawings and the mounting bracket 1 increases. These ends of the expanded cross-sectional areas of the plug openings 9, which form the stop, are hidden from view in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2012 102 775 U | Jul 2012 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
128175 | Secomb | Jun 1872 | A |
134614 | Secomb | Jan 1873 | A |
188478 | Ogborn et al. | Mar 1877 | A |
316335 | Crowther | Apr 1885 | A |
320741 | Abrams | Jun 1885 | A |
386022 | Martin | Jul 1888 | A |
438722 | Wilson | Oct 1890 | A |
474018 | Laliberte | May 1892 | A |
614820 | Anderson | Nov 1898 | A |
746211 | Webb | Dec 1903 | A |
797011 | Mosier | Aug 1905 | A |
3176323 | Degen | Apr 1965 | A |
3588930 | Frisell | Jun 1971 | A |
4222134 | Degen | Sep 1980 | A |
4703526 | Degen | Nov 1987 | A |
5052063 | Elmalek et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5127114 | Horburger | Jul 1992 | A |
6305038 | Elkhuizen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7861333 | Grossman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
D649016 | Rasmussen | Nov 2011 | S |
20090025142 | Grossman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20140173824 | Lorenz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140201908 | Lorenz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3230494 | Feb 1984 | DE |
3506027 | Jan 1986 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140173824 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |