Patent Application
20130057053
This patent disclosure relates generally to braking systems, and, more particularly to braking systems and methods that combine electric retarding and friction braking to slow a machine.
Braking systems are used in a large variety of machines and vehicles to control, slow and stop the machine. Exemplary machines include passenger vehicles, trains, dump trucks, and mining vehicles. Machines increasingly use electric drive systems to provide propulsion for the machine. For example, passenger vehicles may use a hybrid drive system whereby a traditional gasoline powered engine and an electric motor are both used to provide propulsion for the vehicle. Machines, such as a railway engines and off-road vehicles may use a diesel powered engine to drive a generator, which provides electric power to a motor. The motor then provides propulsion for the machine.
Braking systems may take advantage of components in electric drive systems to provide braking for machines. For example, a hybrid passenger vehicle may include a regenerative braking system whereby the vehicle is slowed by the electric drive system while at the same time a battery in the vehicle is recharged. Railway engines use dynamic retarding to slow the train. Although brake systems utilizing electric drive systems have been used, these systems cannot stop a machine traveling at high speed quickly, nor can these systems consistently slow a heavily loaded machine traveling downhill or in slippery conditions.
Some prior systems include a manual retarder lever that enables the operator to control ground speed by manually selecting the level of retarding or automatic retarder control that automatically controls machine speed based the operator's machine speed setting. The manual or automatic retarder may control an electric retarding system. Additionally, the operator may control a traditional braking pedal to actuate hydraulic brakes. In this way, the operator can manually control both dynamic retarding and hydraulic brakes. However, this configuration may be difficult for an operator to control effectively. For example, if the speed setting lever is set to high, the operator may have to rely more on the service brakes. In a large, heavily loaded machine, this may lead to the service brakes overheating. In addition, excess service brake wear may occur on a machine if the service brakes are used for continuous retarding.
One exemplary braking system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,441,573 to Zuber et al. This system describes an electrical and friction braking system. However, the system does not vary the ratio of braking torques based upon user controls, nor based upon whether the electric braking system is meeting the requested retarding needs of the machine.
The foregoing background discussion is intended solely to aid the reader. It is not intended to limit the disclosure, and thus should not be taken to indicate that any particular element of a prior system is unsuitable for use within the disclosure, nor is it intended to indicate that any element, including solving the motivating problem, is essential in implementing the systems and methods described herein. The implementations and application of the systems and methods described herein are defined by the appended claims.
The disclosure describes, in one aspect, a method of braking a machine having an electric drive configuration. The electric drive configuration includes at least one electric retarding system connected to a first set of wheels. Additionally, a first friction brake system associated to the first set of wheels to provide a braking output torque. A second friction brake system associated to a second set of wheels and provides a second braking output torque.
A desired machine retarding torque to be applied to the machine is calculated. A desired ratio of machine retarding torque splits between the first set of wheels and the second set of wheels is determined. The electric retarding system is commanded to supply the calculated output torque based on the desired machine retarding torque and the desired ratio of torque splits. It is then determined whether the output torque supplied by the at least one electric retarder system approximates the calculated output torque. Next, a ratio of the first brake system output torque to the second brake system output torque is applied to supplement the output torque supplied by the electric retarding system if the electric retarding system is not providing the desired machine retarding torque.
In another aspect, the disclosure describes an off-road work machine having an engine connected to a generator that powers an electric motor. An electric retarding system is associated with a rear set of wheels. A front friction brake system associated to a front set of wheels and provides a front brake system output torque. A rear friction brake system connects to the rear set of wheels and provides a rear brake system output torque. The electric motor connects to a set of rear wheels and is configured to provide electric retarding to the off-road machine.
The off-road work machine includes at least one control module configured to calculate a desired machine retarding torque to be applied to the machine. A signal indicative of a desired ratio of machine retarding torque splits between the front set of wheels and the rear set of wheels is obtained. The control module commands the at least one electric retarding system to supply a calculated output torque based on the desired machine retarding torque and the desired ratio of retarding torque splits. It is then determined whether an output torque supplied by the at least one electric retarding system approximates the calculated output torque. A ratio of the front brake system output torque to the rear brake system output torque is supplied to supplement the output torque supplied by the at least one electric retarding system if the at least one electric retarding system is not providing the calculated output torque.
This disclosure relates to systems and methods for braking a machine having an electric retarding system and a mechanical brake system. The system automatically balances the braking load between the electric retarding system and the brake system as needed. Additionally, a brake oil cooling system and methods for controlling flow of the brake oil cooling are described.
Referring now to the drawings,
In an alternative embodiment, an engine is not needed and the motor 108 is driven directly from an electric power source, such as a battery. In some embodiments, one motor powers all drive wheels. In alternative embodiments, various number of motors are used to power drive wheels. For example, each drive wheel may have an individual motor associated with the wheel.
When operating in an electric braking, also known as electric retarding, configuration, the drive wheels 110 power the motor 108. Driving the motor 108 places a torque on the drive wheels 110 and causes them to slow, thus braking the machine. The motors 108 generate alternating current. The inverters 106 convert the alternating current to direct current and feed the current to a chopper 112, which acts as a direct current to direct current convert, and resistor grid 114. The power generated by the motors 108 is thus dissipated thru heat by the resistor grid 114. However, in alternative embodiments, the power generated by the motors 108 is stored for later use. In one embodiment, the power generated by the motors 108 is stored in an electric battery. The energy in the electric battery can then be used in drive mode to power the motors 108 and propel the machine.
The braking system operates in two modes. In first mode, the electric retarder supplies as much of the requested braking torque as it can. In a second mode, the electric retarder supplies only a ratio of the requested braking torque. For example, 2/3 of the braking torque may be supplied by the electric retarder and 1/3 may be supplied by the friction brake system. This configuration improves handling by spreading the retarding torque according to the weight on each axle.
Turning to
The user interface 116 includes a manual and automatic retarder interface 120. The user interface 116 interacts with a controller 124. The controller 124 may include one or more control modules. In the illustrated embodiment, two electronic control modules (ECM) are used to implement the controller 124. The drive-train ECM 126 controls elements in the drive-train 128. The drive-train 128 includes the engine 100, generator 102, rectifier 104, inverters 106, motor 108, and chopper 112. When braking the machine, the electric retarding system 130 includes the rectifier 104, inverters 106, motor 108, and chopper 112 and the resistor grid 114. In electric retarding mode, the drive-train ECM 126 commands the electric retarding system 130 to provide a requested desired machine retarding torque and a ratio of retarding torque splits between sets of wheels. Thus, the system drive-train ECM may command the machine to apply the proper ratio of torque splits between, for example a set of front wheels and a set of rear wheels.
In one embodiment, the ratio of retarding torque splits is a ratio of braking torques between a front set of wheels and a rear set of wheels. This ratio may be based on the front brake retarding enable switch 122. The ratio will be more fully described with reference to
In one embodiment, the drive-train ECM 126 receives signals indicating the front brake retarding enable switch 122 status, the manual retarder torque setting and the auto retarder torque setting from a brake ECM 132. Based on these signals, the drive-train ECM 126 calculates the desired machine retarding torque to be applied to the machine. The drive-train ECM 126 provides signals indicating the desired machine retarding torque and the requested electric retarding torque to the brake ECM 132. The brake ECM, based on these signals, determines whether the requested electric retarding torque is sufficient to provide the full desired machine retarding torque. If additional braking is necessary to meet the desired machine retarding torque, the brake ECM requests a ratio of additional braking torque from the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136. The front friction brake system 134 connects to a front set of wheels 138 and the rear friction brake system 136 connects to a rear set of wheels 140. In one embodiment the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136 are part of a hydraulic brake system 142. In this embodiment, the hydraulic brake system includes a front brake solenoid valve 144 for controlling the flow of hydraulic fluid to the front friction brake system 134. Likewise, a rear brake solenoid valve 146 controls the pressure of hydraulic fluid to the rear friction brake system 136.
In large, heavy machines, such as large haul trucks used in off-road applications such as mining, friction brakes may overheat during use. Friction brakes continue to warm as they are applied. If the friction brake system overheats, component life may be reduced. Therefore, in some embodiments a brake cooling system supplies brake cooling oil to cool the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136. Brake cooling oil flows to both front and rear friction brakes. While front brake retarding is not enabled, oil flow is split between front and rear brakes according to the brake power requirements. While front brake retarding is enabled, the majority of the cooling oil flows to the front friction brakes. In one embodiment, the brake ECM 132 provides a signal to the brake cooling flow system 148. The brake ECM 132 and brake cooling flow system 148 can divert additional flow to either the front friction brake system 134 or the rear friction brake system 136. In one embodiment, the flow is based on the ratio of retarding toque splits between set of wheels. In an alternative embodiment, the brake cooling flow system 148 diverts the flow based on heat sensors in the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136.
Turning now to
At step 154, the system limits the requested torque from the electric retarding system 130 to the maximum torque that can be provided by the electric retarding system 130. At current operating conditions, the available electric retarding torque depends on the RPM of the motors. This can be accomplished in a number of ways including pre-calculating the maximum torque that can be provided by the electric retarding system 130 or by receiving feedback signal from the electric retarding system 130 indicative of whether the electric retarding system 130 is providing the requested retarding. In the illustrated embodiment, at step 156, the system requests the remaining 1/3 of the desired machine retarding torque from the front friction brake system 134.
The rear friction brake system 136 is set to 2/3 of the desired machine retarding torque minus the requested torque from the electric retarding system 130 at step 158. Therefore, if the electric retarding system 130 is providing all of the requested torque, then the rear friction brake system 136 is set to not provide any additional braking torque. Finally, at step 160, the front service brake solenoid current and the rear service brake solenoid current are determined based on the front service brake pressure and rear service brake pressure needed to provide the commanded front service brake torque and rear service brake torque.
If, at decision point 150, the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is disabled, then the system moves to step 162. At step 162, the system commands the electric retarding system 130 to supply all of the desired machine retarding torque. At step 164, the system limits the requested torque from the electric retarding system 130 to the maximum torque that can be provided by the electric retarding system 130. As discussed above, this can be accomplished in a number of ways including pre-calculating the maximum torque that can be provided by the electric retarding system 130 or by receiving feedback signal from the electric retarding system 130 indicative of whether the electric retarding system 130 is providing the requested retarding.
In the illustrated embodiment, at step 166, the system requests 1/3 of the desired machine retarding torque minus 1/3 of the requested torque from the electric retarding system 130. Therefore, if the electric retarding system 130 is providing all of the requested torque, then the front friction brake system 134 is set so as not to provide any additional braking torque. At step 168, the rear friction brake system 136 is set to 2/3 of the desired machine retarding torque minus 2/3 of the requested torque from the electric retarding system 130. Therefore, the system maintains the braking ratio of 1/3 braking torque from the front friction brake system 134 and 2/3 of the braking ratio from the rear friction brake system 136 for any braking torque needed to supplement the electric retarding system 130 braking torque. This is done based on the default cooling flow split. The system next enters step 160 as described above.
In one embodiment, the system monitors the temperature of the front and rear brakes using temperature sensors in the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136. Based on the measured temperatures, the braking control process can request additional cooling flow from a brake oil diverter control process described in
Turing now to
If, at decision point 170 the system is in the divert normally state, the system enters decision point 172. At decision point 172, the system determines whether the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is on. If the switch is not on, the system goes to block 174 and enters the divert normal state. From block 174, the system returns to the initial decision point 170. If the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is on, the system enters decision point 176. At decision point 176, the system determines whether the rear friction brake system 136 is in use. If the rear friction brake system 136 is in use, the system enters step 174 and diverts the cooling flow normally. In one embodiment, at decision point 176, the system determines whether the rear brakes had been used within some period of time, such as five seconds. If the rear friction brake system 176 have not been applied, the system enters decision point 178 and determines whether the front friction brake system 134 cooling oil reaches a threshold temperature. If the oil does not reach the threshold, the system enters step 174 and diverts the cooling oil normally. If, at step 178 front friction brake system 134 cooling oil is warm, the system enters step 180 and diverts additional cooling oil flow to the front friction brake system 134. The system then returns to decision point 170.
If, at decision point 170 the last state was not diverting normally, the system enters decision point 182. At decision point 182, the system determines whether the rear friction brake system 136 is in use. If the rear friction brake system 136 is in use, the system enters step 174 and diverts the cooling flow normally. In one embodiment, at decision point 182, the system determines whether the rear brakes had been used within some period of time. If the rear friction brake system 136 is not in use, the system enters decision point 184. At decision point 184, the system determines whether the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is on. If the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is on, the system goes to step 180 and diverts the cooling flow to the front. If the front brake retarding enable switch 122 is off, the system goes to decision point 186. At decision point 186, the system determines whether the front friction brake system 134 is in use. If the front friction brake system 134 is in use, the system enters step 180 and diverts flow to the front friction brake system 134. If the front friction brake system 134 is not in use, the system enters step 174 and diverts the cooling flow normally. In some embodiments, at decision point 186, the system determines whether the front friction brake system 134 has been applied with in some period of time, such as 2 seconds.
The industrial applicably of the methods and systems for braking machines described herein will be readily appreciated from the foregoing discussion. The present disclosure is applicable to many machines and many environments. One exemplary machine suited to the disclosure is a large off-highway truck, such as a dump truck. Exemplary off-highway trucks are commonly used in mines, construction sites and quarries. The off-highway trucks may have payload capabilities of 100 tons or more and travel at speeds of 40 miles per hour or more when fully loaded. The trucks operate in a variety of environments and must be able to negotiate steep inclines in wet conditions.
These large off-highway trucks must be able to slow and stop even when traveling down steep, wet slopes. Using the described methods and systems, trucks can be slowed by using the electric retarding system 130 or the electric retarding system 130 in combination with the front friction brake system 134, the rear friction brake system 136 or both. In some embodiments, the trucks are slowed using the electric retarding system 130 to save wear and tear on the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136. However, in wet conditions, the truck operator can manually engage the front friction brake system 134 to aid machine handling. Additionally, the system can automatically use the front friction brake system 134 and the rear friction brake system 136 to aid in braking when electric retarding capacity is exceeded.
Similarly, the methods and systems described above can be adapted to a large variety of machines and tasks. For example, backhoe loaders, compactors, feller bunchers, forest machines, industrial loaders, skid steer loaders, wheel loaders and many other machines can benefit from the methods and systems described.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing description provides examples of the disclosed system and technique. However, it is contemplated that other implementations of the disclosure may differ in detail from the foregoing examples. All references to the disclosure or examples thereof are intended to reference the particular example being discussed at that point and are not intended to imply any limitation as to the scope of the disclosure more generally. All language of distinction and disparagement with respect to certain features is intended to indicate a lack of preference for those features, but not to exclude such from the scope of the disclosure entirely unless otherwise indicated.
Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Accordingly, this disclosure includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the disclosure unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12183899 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Child | 13665498 | US |
