This invention relates to telephone services and, in particular, to a system for allowing a subscriber to select features of the subscriber's telephone service and to various novel features that can be selected.
People have used various means for limiting interruptions due to the telephone. In the past, people used switchboards and secretaries to screen incoming, or inbound, calls. Voice mail systems took over some of this role both in the home and in the central office. Today, there are web-based companies managing 3rd-party call control, via the toll-switch network, which allow users to enter call control information through a web portal. There are also edge devices in each of the public telephone company's central offices which provide local control, but offer an extremely limited number of features and do not provide true 3rd-party call control.
The web-based toll systems provide good user interaction but they are not economical and cannot take advantage of local number portability because they do not provide local control and connectivity.
The Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) consists of a plurality of edge switches connected to telephones on one side and to a network of tandem switches on the other. The tandem switch network allows connectivity between all of the edge switches, and a signalling system is used by the PSTN to allow calling and to transmit both calling and called party identity.
Until now, optional features were provided by the local service telephone company (telco) through the edge switch at the central office (CO). It was not possible to provide optional features through any other means. Control of these features was done through the first party (calling party) or the second party (called party), or worse yet, manually by calling the business office.
In the past, numerous devices have been built that allow the connection of two lines together at an edge switch. These devices can be used to add features to a telephone network by receiving a call on one line and then dialing out on another line. The problem with these devices is that, because they are connected through an edge switch, transmission losses and impairments occur, degrading the overall connection. In addition, signalling limitations prevent full control, by the subscriber or the system, over the call.
A preferred embodiment of the inventive system described herein connects at the tandem, thereby eliminating these problems.
In the edge devices residing in the PSTN central offices, the 1st party (the calling party) has numerous features available (dialing options). The 2nd party (called party) also has options available such as call forwarding, but these features typically require access from the first or second party's device and are extremely awkward to program. The user interaction is not only awkward, it is limited and requires interaction with the telephone company to provision them. In other words, past systems for provisioning, meaning addition, modification, or control of telephone features, required a subscriber to make the feature selection through the telephone business office. Central office workers would then implement the provisioning under request of the business office.
Call Forwarding is one popular provision. There is signification transmission degradation for Call Forwarding to take place. The calling party pays for a call to the edge device, and the edge subscriber, the called party, pays for the call to the forwarding number. For enhanced inbound call control to occur, a direct 3rd-party call control means is needed.
A variety of services have arisen to address the problems mentioned above. Many of these systems allow the called party to make changes to his/her call forwarding attributes which do not allow direct 3rd-party call control. These services provide good user interaction, some via the internet, but they rely upon the toll network through the use of “800” numbers. This requires the subscriber to pay by the minute and does not allow the subscriber to take advantage of number portability in order to obtain 3rd-party call control. There are other toll network mechanisms for remote call forwarding. For example, MCI offers a service where the customer can remotely change the forwarding target number for “800” numbers. Contacting the ultimate end-user before terminating the first incoming call is similar to the manner in which “800” credit calls and collect calls are processed, but these are not done at the local subscriber level.
In addition to these toll services, there are edge devices that perform some of the same services. Edge devices such as phones and PBXs that include voice mail, inter-active voice response, call forwarding, speed calling, etc., have been used to provide additional call control. These devices allow the phone user direct control over incoming and outgoing calls. The disadvantage of edge devices is that they add cost, degrade voice and transmission quality, can be difficult to program, are not easily programmed remotely, can require the user to pay for two lines, provide lower quality of service, and cannot provide the same level of functionality as a system that controls the PSTN directly. There are Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoiP) products emerging that provide better user interfaces and control but they do not take advantage and voice quality of the PSTN.
A system for allowing a subscriber to remotely control features is described herein along with various telephone features that may be programmed into the system. A subscriber may be any customer using the telephone service, in contrast to employees of the PSTN who may use special communication networks within the PSTN. Two such features are caller ID (CID) based call routing and branch calling. The system allows the subscriber to set up a feature where the CID signal is detected within the PSTN and automatically associated with stored information relating to the caller. The stored information may have been previously entered into a memory within the PSTN by the subscriber via the world wide web. The CID signal may be also used to route the call to one of more forwarding numbers or to take any other action, such as blocking the call. This feature also allows the subscriber to use the CID signal to display certain information even though the caller may have her CID blocked.
Another feature described herein is referred to as branch calling, which allows a call to be forwarded to multiple telephones simultaneously, where the first telephone answered terminates the calling of the other telephones (or any other end units).
The preferred system described herein adds direct control of third party call control features, but does not suffer from any of the disadvantages listed above, and allows the subscriber to manage his/her telephone system in a dynamic and exceptionally useful manner that is not currently available through the existing PSTN. The system allows enhanced direct third-party call control features, such as selective call routing and remote dialing, to be added to the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) using local call control and providing dynamic provisioning of the system by the subscriber. Direct 3rd-party control means that the ability to provision the 3rd-party features is directly available to a subscriber, eliminating the need to go through the telephone company (telco) business office.
In one embodiment, the system includes a processor (referred to herein as a tandem access controller) connected to the PSTN which would allow anyone to directly provision, that is to say set-up and make immediate changes to, the configuration of his or her phone line. In another embodiment, a tandem access controller (TAC) subsystem is connected internally to the PSTN in a local service area. The TAC provides features, selected by the subscriber, to all edge switches connected to the PSTN tandem switch. Connecting directly to the PSTN tandem switch (or embedding the system into the tandem switch) eliminates the signal degradation problems previously described.
In one embodiment, the system allows provisioning of features via the internet under direct control of the subscriber. Recently, several products have been introduced that provide a means of controlling features via the public internet. However, all these devices fall short in that they require the subscriber to obtain an “800” number or some other number that requires the subscriber to pay a toll charge each time a call is made. The system connects locally, so no toll charges are incurred.
The offered features are implemented by software programs run by the processing system.
The web-enhanced services in one embodiment of the invention coexist with and overlay the local phone service at the local level, thereby providing good economics and user interaction, single number access to multiple subscriber devices, connectivity without transmission impairments and true, direct 3rd-party call control.
The present system relies upon use of local telephone facilities thereby eliminating all the extra charges associated with making toll calls. It also allows the user to take advantage of number portability and keep his/her existing public phone number.
The TAC 10 is connected to or inside the conventional PSTN tandem switch 16 such that calls may flow through the TAC 10 in the same manner as the existing PSTN tandem switch, except that additional 3rd-party features are applied to the call. As is well known, PSTN tandem switches are exchanges that direct telephone calls (or other traffic) to central offices 17,18 or to other tandem switches. Details of the operation of the existing phone network may be found in the publication entitled “New Net SS7 Tutorial,” by ADC Telecommunications, copyright 1999, incorporated herein by reference. Additional details may be found in the numerous books describing the PSTN.
The PSTN tandem switch 16 directs a first call (from the calling party 20 to the subscriber's phone 14 using the subscriber's public phone number) to the TAC 10, which in turn places a second call, subject to 3rd-party control information, to the subscriber's “private” phone number without yet terminating the first call. The TAC 10 is connected within the subscriber's local service area so calls from TAC 10 to the subscriber do not incur a toll. When the subscriber 12 terminates (or answers) the second call, the TAC 10 terminates the first call and connects it to the second call, thereby connecting the calling party 20 to the subscriber 12. Hence, the calling party essentially calls the TAC 10, using the subscriber's public phone number, and the TAC 10, after processing the call using the selected features, calls the subscriber, as appropriate, using the subscriber's private phone number and connects the two calls. The process is transparent to the parties.
The TAC 10 is connected inside the PSTN in the sense that it is not an edge device such as a PBX or central office (CO) switch because it does not connect directly to subscribers. Rather, it redirects calls to subscribers. The TAC 10 provides intelligent interconnection between a calling party and a subscriber.
The reader should keep in mind that although only one tandem switch 16 is shown in
The invention may also include ivr/vm/voverip.
The subscriber can also program a set of the call control features via a telephone link in the event a data link connection is unavailable.
Incoming call data is received by the TAC 10 from the tandem switch 16. The TAC 10 processor checks calling and called numbers, class of service, time of day, number lists, etc. In some cases additional data is gathered from the calling party via a DSP (Digital Signal Processing) system and stored in the system memory. The DSP system is used to play call progress tones and voice announcements as required. Voice announcements can be played through the DSP system. In response to the call data, an outgoing call to the subscriber 12 may be placed back through the tandem switch 16 by TAC 10. The TAC 10 links the two calls and monitors the connection.
Information about the call may be collected by the TAC 10 and sent to the subscriber or a 3rd party for display. Such information may be the length of the call or information used to bill the subscriber for the use of the system. The provisioning system can also collect control information from a 3rd party and relay it back to the TAC 10, which will then affect the call accordingly.
One embodiment of the invention allows a subscriber to view the current state of his/her telephone via the Internet. Internet is a term of art by which we mean an interconnection of packet switched networks. Prior to this system there was no way for a user to examine the status of a telephone line. Recently, several products have been introduced that provide a means of examining the voice message boxes.
An internet portal is connected via a data link to the TAC 10. When a user logs onto the internet portal and is granted access to an individual subscription, the user can examine the status of calls/features. This information is transmitted from the TAC 10 to the web portal and translated into user viewables. The TAC 10 keeps track of incoming and outgoing calls based on this information.
The TAC 10 may be implemented using conventional processor hardware. The connection to the tandem switch 16 may be as simple as a telephone circuit, since the TAC 10 receives an incoming call from a caller and processes the call. Devising the software/firmware use to control the TAC 10 is well within the capability of those skilled in the art since the various control features that can be made available are generally already known.
Certain advantages that can be obtained using the invention include the following:
Web-Based Telecom Navigator
Manage Incoming Call Control
Manage Outgoing Call Control
Web-Based Billing
Web-Driven Personal Communications Management
Cost-Effective Single Phone Number Access
On-Line “Personal Digital Assistant”
On-Line “Telcom Navigator”
Inspired User Interaction
Secure and Reliable Technology
Cost-Effective Single Phone Number Access
CLEC Status
Compatible With Existing Devices, Standards
Web-Based Personal Digital Assistant
Centralized and Consistent Personal Data
Web Dialing
Unified Messaging
User Interaction
Expected Behavior
Mode-Based Definition and Selection
Learning Modes
Automatic Data Capture
Secure and Reliable Technology
Separate Web-Site and Link Gateway
VoIP Link Degradation Detection
E-Commerce Security
One advantage of using TAC 10 is its ability to enhance caller ID information. Caller ID is a common feature where a calling party's telephone number is transmitted to the called party's telephone so it can be displayed on a small display screen in the telephone. This caller ID information is provided by the calling party's central office switch. Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) is a global standard for telecommunications and defines the procedures and protocol by which network elements in the PSTN exchange information (including the caller ID) over the telephone network for call set up, routing, and control. In some telephone sets, including wireless telephones, the name of the caller associated with the telephone number is also displayed on the called party's display screen.
TAC 10 can use this automatically generated caller ID signal to provide an enhanced set of caller ID related features. One such feature is the association of the standard caller ID information with additional information about the caller stored in a memory addressed by TAC 10. The enhanced caller ID information provided through TAC 10 provides a valuable tool to the subscriber in handling incoming calls. The basic caller ID information, such as the caller's telephone number and name, can still be sent to the subscriber's phone and displayed in a conventional manner while the enhanced caller ID information may be displayed on the phone display or on the subscriber's computer monitor via the web.
The caller ID signals, pursuant to the SS7 protocol, are detected by TAC 10 when a calling party calls the subscriber using the subscriber's public telephone number, as previously described. TAC 10 then uses the basic caller ID data to address a look-up table (LUT) containing any additional information that the subscriber has entered into the LUT's memory locations for association with that caller ID data.
In one example, the subscriber may identify a prospective calling party's telephone number to TAC 10 via the Internet and then associate the number with any other information for storing in LUT 40. Such other information may be all the possible callers using the calling telephone, personal information regarding the calling party, billing information, business information, account numbers, past discussions with the caller, or any other information. When TAC 10 detects the caller ID signals, TAC 10 addresses LUT 40 and downloads the retrieved information to the subscriber's telephone display or to the subscriber's computer via the web. Since TAC 10 (including LUT 40) stores this additional information, the subscriber is not required to personally provide processing or memory devices for this feature.
Multiple subscribers use the same TAC 10 and LUT 40 but only the memory locations in LUT 40 authorized for access by a particular subscriber are available to that subscriber.
A subscriber may program TAC 10 using the various means described previously to perform any number of features on an incoming telephone call based upon the caller ID data. Such features include forwarding a call associated with that particular caller ID data to one or more other telephones, or blocking calls associated with that particular caller ID data. Such calls may be forwarded or blocked only at certain times or on certain days as requested by the subscriber. All of the other features previously described may also be applied based upon the caller ID.
When the calling party elects to block her caller ID information, displaying the caller's number and name on the subscriber's telephone may violate the privacy act, so such a restriction should be programmed into the system. However, TAC 10 may still use the caller ID information for various legal purposes. For example, the subscriber may not wish to receive phone calls from a particular phone number or calling party. The subscriber may transmit to TAC 10 the caller ID information (e.g., the telephone number and/or the name) and instruct TAC 10 to either forward the call, block the call, or transmit any additional information from LUT 40 to the subscriber's phone display or computer monitor for screening the caller.
If caller ID information does not exist, such as where the local telephone company does not offer caller ID, TAC 10, when receiving the incoming call, can transmit an automatic message to the caller to enter identification information. TAC 10 then uses that information to address LUT 40 to identify any associated information in LUT 40 for transmission to the subscriber. TAC 10, in a recorded or simulated voice, can request the caller to enter her phone number via the telephone keypad. Alternatively, TAC can request that the caller speak her name or number, which would then be played to the subscriber or converted to text or a code by TAC 10 to address LUT 40. Alternatively, the caller can enter a personal identification number or any other type of code (e.g., the caller's name) via the keypad, which would identify the caller to TAC 10. Once obtained, the caller ID information entered can be used to route the incoming call via TAC 10 in any way programmed by the subscriber. Call routing can be based on time of day, the caller ID, any web input instructions, a direction by the calling party itself, or any other variable.
This technique is contrasted with 800-type services, which are reverse long distance services requiring the owner of the 800 number to pay for the incoming call. With 800 numbers, the caller ID must be unblocked to identify the amount of the toll. With the inventive technique, even blocked caller ID calls can result in information about the caller being transmitted to the subscriber or used by TAC 10 to selectively perform a function.
In step 50 of
In step 52, using the SS7 protocol, TAC 10 detects the caller ID signal (CID), if any. Even if the calling party has a blocked CID, the CID is still transmitted to TAC 10; however the blocked caller ID cannot be displayed on the called party's telephone. If the CID is detected, the process continues to steps 54 and 56, which determine whether the CID is associated with any data in a look-up table. Existing data in the look-up table associated with the CID indicates that the caller is a previous caller. If caller ID information is known without ever previously receiving a call from that party, the additional information can still be entered into the look-up table, and the calling party will be treated as not a new caller in step 54.
Assuming the caller has information stored in the look-up table, this additional information is retrieved by TAC 10 and displayed on a web page (step 58) that is accessible by the subscriber via the web. In addition, the caller's name and telephone number may also by displayed (step 60). The information may also be transmitted to the subscriber's telephone for display.
In step 62, TAC 10 performs any programmed function on the call, such as forwarding the call to the subscriber's private telephone number or another number.
The placing of the second call by TAC 10 causes the called phone to ring (step 64) as well as causes the CID and additional information to be available to the subscriber (step 66) on the subscriber's telephone display. When the subscriber answers the phone, TAC 10 completes the connection between the two parties.
The retrieved information from LUT 40 that is transmitted over the web may appear as a screen pop-up on the subscriber's monitor. This CID information can then be reviewed and edited to include new information about the caller provided during the call. The subscriber then downloads this edited information to TAC 10 so future calls from the same caller would display the new information.
In step 54 if it is determined that the CID information is not associated with any existing information in the look-up table, TAC 10 determines whether the CID is blocked (identified in the SS7 protocol) in step 68. If the CID is not blocked, then the CID information is transmitted to the subscriber's telephone when TAC 10 places the call to the subscriber's private number (or any other forwarding number), and the CID is displayed on the subscriber's phone.
In step 68, if it is determined that the CID is blocked, TAC 10 will prompt the caller, via a recorded message or a simulated voice, to press the appropriate touch tone buttons to unblock the CID (step 70). For example, TAC 10 may be programmed to detect that a “1” key is pressed by the caller to unblock CID and then treat the CID information as unblocked. Alternatively, the caller may be required to call back after pressing the proper touch tone keys to unblock the CID in a conventional way.
In step 72, if the CID is now unblocked, the CID is obtained from the caller in step 74. The process also goes to step 74 if, in step 52, the CID is not initially obtained.
In step 76, TAC 10 determines whether the CID signal has been provided by the calling party from either the automatic CID signals or from the caller manually entering the caller's telephone number, name, or PIN, as previously described. If yes, then in step 54 TAC 10 uses the CID information to determine whether the caller is a new caller, and the remainder of the process continues as previously described.
In step 72, if it is determined that the CID remains blocked after TAC 10 has prompted the caller to unblock the CID, then in step 74 it is determined by TAC 10 is step 77 (after reviewing the subscriber's programmed instructions) whether the subscriber is accepting blocked calls. If yes, TAC 10 then places a call to the subscriber's private number or any other number identified by the subscriber, and puts the blocked call through. The blocked CID information would not be transmitted to the subscriber's phone.
If the subscriber's instructions are to not accept blocked calls, then in step 78 the blocked call is not forwarded to the subscriber's phone, or the blocked call is sent to voice mail. Voice mail may be a memory internal to TAC 10, or TAC 10 may transmit a special code to the subscriber's phone that automatically causes the call to be routed to a private voice mail system.
As seen, as long as the caller ID data received by TAC 10 has information associated with it in the look-up table, the stored information can be transmitted to the subscriber even if the caller ID is blocked. Further, even blocked caller IDs can still be used by TAC 10 to perform a routing function on the call. The caller ID feature may be implemented by a software program run by the processing system in TAC 10.
Because the conventional blocked CID information provided by the phone company is never displayed to the subscriber, the tagging system does not violate the privacy act. Known features such as call trace (where CID is provided to law enforcement people), or call return (where the blocked caller can be called back) have established a legal precedent that it is ok to use blocked CID information for certain purposes as long as the caller ID is not disclosed to the called party
Branch Calling
Branch calling is an enhanced telephone feature not believed to be provided on today's public telephone networks. This feature can be easily provided using TAC 10.
Branch calling is a technique where a caller places a first call intended for a called party to TAC 10. After receiving the call, TAC 10 looks up the call handling instructions programmed into TAC 10 by the subscriber via the web, via the telephone, or via any other technique. One set of these instructions is branch calling, which instructs TAC 10 to simultaneously call any number of different telephone numbers programmed into TAC 10 by the subscriber. The called phone numbers may be any combination of local, long distance, or cellular numbers.
When a party answers one of the ringing lines, the answering party is connected to the calling party, and the other calls are abandoned.
For branch calling to operate in the most desirable manner, the system must detect that a call has been answered in order to terminate the calls to the other telephones (or other end units). Accordingly, some form of answer supervision must be present. Answer supervision is implemented inside the PSTN but generally not available to private networks (e.g., PABXs). Since SS7 signaling supports answer supervision, it is easy for this branch calling feature to be provided through TAC 10 since TAC 10 is connected inside the PSTN.
Prior art systems without answer supervision must call each forwarding number sequentially, whereby after a certain number of preprogrammed rings, the calling stops and the next number is called until someone answers the phone. Because a ringing time-out must occur before the next call can be tried, an unrealistically long delay can occur before the call is placed to the proper telephone and finally answered. In contrast, the present invention allows TAC 10 to ring all the numbers simultaneously so the call can be answered quickly.
It is desirable that the answer supervision signaling not be delayed so that the calling and called parties may be connected quickly when the call is answered and so that during the delay time two parties do not answer two different ringing phones.
In step 80 of
In step 82, TAC 10 looks up the routing instructions for the DNIS (Dialed Number Identification Service) and caller ID (if any). The DNIS identifies the number that was called, and the caller ID (CID) identifies the calling telephone number and sometimes the caller. DNIS works by transmitting the touch tone digits to TAC 10. A subscriber for TAC 10 may program TAC 10, as previously described, to perform any number of functions based upon the DNIS number, the CID, the time of day, or based upon any other factor. Such instructions may be stored in a look-up table addressed by the subscriber's public phone number (identified by the DNIS number). Since multiple subscribers will be using the same TAC 10, TAC 10 needs to know what number was dialed in order to perform the function on the call selected by the subscriber.
In step 86, TAC 10 identifies the features to apply to the incoming call. If the instructions are to block the call, then TAC 10 blocks the call in step 87. In the present example, it is assumed that the feature the subscriber wants to apply is a branch calling feature where two telephone numbers are to be called by TAC 10.
In step 88, TAC 10 generates a ring back tone to the caller to indicate that a telephone is ringing.
In step 90, TAC 10 places a call to a first telephone number, which causes the called phone to ring (step 92). Parallel operations are performed for a second phone number in steps 93 and 95.
In step 96, it is determined by TAC 10 whether the first phone has been answered using answer supervision signaling provided by SS7 (step 98).
In response to the answer supervision signaling, TAC 10 abandons the other call to the second telephone (step 100).
In step 102, TAC 10 completes the phone call by connecting the calling party to the answered telephone. This process may be applied to other than telephones, such as computers or other types of communication equipment.
In step 96, if the call is not answered after the ring, it is determined whether the other telephone has been answered (step 104). If not, the two phones continue to ring.
If it is determined in step 104 that another telephone has been answered (i.e., the answer supervision signal has been received by TAC 10), the call to the first telephone is abandoned (step 106).
The same operation is performed with respect to the second telephone call in steps 108-113.
Any number of telephone calls may be simultaneously placed by TAC 10 in response to a branch calling instruction.
In step 86, if the instructions programmed by the subscriber are to block the call, then TAC 10 blocks the call in step 87.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.
This application is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/426,279, filed Apr. 30, 2003, entitled “Branch Calling and Caller ID Based Call Routing Telephone Features,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/565,565, filed May 4, 2000, entitled “Telephone Call Control System for the Public Switched Telephone Network,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,574,328, both incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4100377 | Flanagan | Jul 1978 | A |
4238851 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4348554 | Asmuth | Sep 1982 | A |
4569041 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4608685 | Jain et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611094 | Asmuth et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4611096 | Asmuth et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4630260 | Toy et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4630262 | Callens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4661947 | Lea et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4674082 | Flanagin et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4679190 | Dias et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4679191 | Nelson et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4707831 | Weir et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4715026 | Eberspaecher | Dec 1987 | A |
4723238 | Isreal et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4757497 | Beierle et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4761779 | Nara et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771425 | Baran et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4815071 | Shimizu | Mar 1989 | A |
4819228 | Baran et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4862451 | Closs et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866704 | Bergman | Sep 1989 | A |
4872159 | Hemmady et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4872160 | Hemmady et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4885739 | Read et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4903261 | Baran et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4926416 | Weik | May 1990 | A |
4932022 | Keeney et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4933931 | Kokubo | Jun 1990 | A |
4953158 | Schreur | Aug 1990 | A |
4953198 | Daly et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958341 | Hemmady et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962497 | Ferenc et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969184 | Gordon et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4970721 | Aczel et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4973837 | Bradbeer | Nov 1990 | A |
4975695 | Almond et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4996685 | Farese et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014266 | Bales et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018136 | Gollub | May 1991 | A |
5020058 | Holden et al. | May 1991 | A |
5022071 | Mozer et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5048081 | Gavaras et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5051983 | Kammerl | Sep 1991 | A |
5093827 | Franklin et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5115431 | Williams et al. | May 1992 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5157662 | Tadamura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5197067 | Fujimoto et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208806 | Hasegawa | May 1993 | A |
5218602 | Grant et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5231633 | Hluchyj et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5241588 | Babson, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247571 | Kay et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5268900 | Hluchyj et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274635 | Rahman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5291489 | Morgan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297191 | Gerszberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5301189 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305308 | English et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311582 | Davenport et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327428 | Van As et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341374 | Lewen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351276 | Doll, Jr. et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351286 | Nici | Sep 1994 | A |
5353283 | Tsuchiya | Oct 1994 | A |
5359598 | Steagall et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365521 | Ohnishi et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5379293 | Kanno et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381405 | Daugherty et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381466 | Shibayama et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383183 | Yoshida | Jan 1995 | A |
5384840 | Blatchford et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390184 | Morris | Feb 1995 | A |
5396491 | Newman | Mar 1995 | A |
5420858 | Marshall et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422882 | Hiller et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423003 | Berteau | Jun 1995 | A |
5426636 | Hiller et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428607 | Hiller et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428616 | Field et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428663 | Grimes et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430719 | Weisser, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434913 | Tung et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436898 | Bowen et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438614 | Rozman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444709 | Riddle | Aug 1995 | A |
5448623 | Wiedeman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452289 | Sharma et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453986 | Davis et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455853 | Cebulka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457684 | Bharucha et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471470 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471616 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479411 | Klein | Dec 1995 | A |
5485457 | Aramaki | Jan 1996 | A |
5495567 | Iizawa et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497339 | Bernard | Mar 1996 | A |
5521914 | Mavraganis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5526353 | Henley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537403 | Cloonan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541917 | Farris | Jul 1996 | A |
5544161 | Bigham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544163 | Madonna | Aug 1996 | A |
5544164 | Baran | Aug 1996 | A |
5544168 | Jeffrey et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553063 | Dickson | Sep 1996 | A |
5557658 | Gregorek et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563937 | Bruno et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566236 | MeLampy et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568475 | Doshi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570355 | Dail et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572583 | Wheeler, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577038 | Miyahara | Nov 1996 | A |
5577041 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579308 | Humpleman | Nov 1996 | A |
5590181 | Hogan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592477 | Farris et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592538 | Kosowsky et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594732 | Bell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600643 | Robrock, II | Feb 1997 | A |
5600649 | Sharma et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602991 | Berteau | Feb 1997 | A |
5604737 | Iwami et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606594 | Register et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608786 | Gordon | Mar 1997 | A |
5613069 | Walker | Mar 1997 | A |
H1641 | Sharman | Apr 1997 | H |
5621727 | Vaudreuil | Apr 1997 | A |
5625677 | Feiertag et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628004 | Gormley et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631897 | Pacheco et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640446 | Everett et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646945 | Bergler | Jul 1997 | A |
5650999 | Dickson | Jul 1997 | A |
5654957 | Koyama | Aug 1997 | A |
5659541 | Chan | Aug 1997 | A |
5659542 | Bell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5680437 | Segal | Oct 1997 | A |
5684799 | Bigham et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689553 | Ahuja et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692126 | Templeton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5701301 | Weisser, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710769 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712903 | Bartholomew et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724412 | Srinivasan | Mar 1998 | A |
5727057 | Emery et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729544 | Lev et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732074 | Spaur et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732078 | Arango | Mar 1998 | A |
5732216 | Logan et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737320 | Madonna | Apr 1998 | A |
5737331 | Hoppal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5737333 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5737533 | De Hond | Apr 1998 | A |
5740164 | Liron | Apr 1998 | A |
5740231 | Cohn et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742596 | Baratz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751706 | Land et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751968 | Cohen | May 1998 | A |
5754641 | Voit et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764628 | Davis et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764736 | Shachar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764750 | Chau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764756 | Onweller | Jun 1998 | A |
5777991 | Adachi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790538 | Sugar | Aug 1998 | A |
5793762 | Penners et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793771 | Darland et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799072 | Vulcan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799154 | Kuriyan | Aug 1998 | A |
5802160 | Kugell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805587 | Norris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805588 | Petersen | Sep 1998 | A |
5806057 | Gormley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809022 | Byers et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809128 | McMullin | Sep 1998 | A |
5812534 | Davis et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815505 | Mills | Sep 1998 | A |
5818912 | Hammond | Oct 1998 | A |
5825771 | Cohen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828666 | Focsaneanu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838665 | Kahn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850433 | Rondeau | Dec 1998 | A |
5859972 | Subramaniam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867494 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875405 | Honda | Feb 1999 | A |
5878113 | Bhusri | Mar 1999 | A |
5878418 | Polcyn et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881060 | Morrow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881131 | Farris et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889774 | Mirashrafi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894473 | Dent | Apr 1999 | A |
5894595 | Foladare et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913029 | Shostak | Jun 1999 | A |
5915008 | Dulman | Jun 1999 | A |
5918172 | Saunders et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922047 | Newlin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930700 | Pepper et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933490 | White et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933778 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938757 | Bertsch | Aug 1999 | A |
5946386 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946684 | Lund | Aug 1999 | A |
5953392 | Rhie et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954799 | Goheen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958016 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960340 | Fuentes | Sep 1999 | A |
5963551 | Minko | Oct 1999 | A |
5970059 | Ahopelto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974449 | Chang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982866 | Kowalski | Nov 1999 | A |
5991291 | Asai et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991394 | Dezonno et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005870 | Leung et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006272 | Aravamudan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009469 | Mattaway et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012088 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014437 | Acker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020916 | Gerszberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026083 | Albrow et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028917 | Creamer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031836 | Haserodt | Feb 2000 | A |
6031904 | An et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041325 | Shah et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044403 | Gerszberg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6069890 | White et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075992 | Moon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078581 | Shtivelman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084584 | Nahi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094478 | Shepherd et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104800 | Benson | Aug 2000 | A |
6134235 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141341 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161128 | Smyk | Dec 2000 | A |
6161134 | Wang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163598 | Moore | Dec 2000 | A |
6167040 | Haeggstrom | Dec 2000 | A |
6175860 | Gaucher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188688 | Buskirk, Jr. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212261 | Meubus et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216158 | Luo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240097 | Wesloek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6259692 | Shtivelman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262978 | Bruno et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266539 | Pardo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278707 | MacMillan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308201 | Pivowar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327258 | Deschaine et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334126 | Nagatomo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337858 | Petty et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339594 | Civanlar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359892 | Szlam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381323 | Schwab et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385308 | Cohen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404764 | Jones et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411615 | DeGolia et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411965 | Klug | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6414962 | Hall et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418198 | Brablec et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6421235 | Ditzik | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445694 | Swartz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445697 | Fenton | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448978 | Salvador et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456594 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456601 | Kozdon et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459780 | Wurster et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477565 | Daswani et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477576 | Angwin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483902 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493338 | Preston et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496477 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526462 | Elabd | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539359 | Ladd et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6577622 | Shuster et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584490 | Shuster et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6614781 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650901 | Shuster et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6681252 | Shuster et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697461 | Middleswarth et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731630 | Shuster et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741586 | Shuster et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744759 | Sidhu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785266 | Swartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788775 | Simpson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795429 | Shuster et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804224 | Shuster et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6822957 | Shuster et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6853714 | Liljestrand et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856616 | Shuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857021 | Shuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857072 | Shuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Shuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6914897 | Shuster et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6937699 | Shuster et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6956941 | Duncan et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
20010022784 | Menon et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010030950 | Chen et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030026403 | Clapper | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040325 | Clark | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030095650 | Mize | May 2003 | A1 |
20030133553 | Khakoo et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030156693 | Goldman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030194078 | Wood et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040029568 | DeLuca et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050041526 | Esmersoy et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050141500 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050169445 | Harris | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207557 | Dolan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19813179 | Sep 1999 | DE |
0578374 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0704788 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0738093 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 789 470 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 794 650 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 797 373 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 824 298 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0 829 995 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 841 831 | May 1998 | EP |
0 847 176 | Jun 1998 | EP |
0 851 653 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 853 411 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0858202 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 866 596 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 872 998 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0869688 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0918423 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0881848 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0898431 | Feb 1999 | EP |
2 315 190 | Jan 1998 | GB |
10-23067 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-51453 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-164135 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-164257 | Jun 1998 | JP |
WO9405111 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9534985 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9608935 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9615598 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9714234 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9714238 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9716007 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9722216 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9723078 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9727692 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9728628 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9729581 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9731492 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9731492 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9733412 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9733421 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9738511 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9738551 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9739560 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO9744943 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9746073 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9747118 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9750217 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9750271 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9750277 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9800988 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9804065 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9804989 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO9810538 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9811704 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9812860 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9813974 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9816051 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9818238 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9818289 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9819425 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9819445 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9820701 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9821911 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9823067 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9823080 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9826543 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9828885 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9830007 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9830008 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9830008 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9834391 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9834399 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9836543 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9837665 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9837665 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9837688 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9839897 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9842104 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9842107 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9842146 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9847256 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9851063 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO9912365 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9919988 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9920059 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9935802 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9945687 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO0105078 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0124496 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0124498 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0124500 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0124501 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0124502 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0124503 | Apr 2001 | WO |
0184859 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080075262 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10426279 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11948965 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09565565 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10426279 | US |