The main stream brassiere wire of today has a resin protective cap 2 attached to the tip of wire 1 as illustrated in
The major problem of the wire having a protective cap is that the protective cap detaches from the wire during wearing or washing. In order to overcome this problem, wire suppliers provide means to make the protective cap hard to detach from the wire by forming a hole or notch at the tip of the wire as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,133,316. As a result, the protective cap with a hole or notch is less likely to detach from the wire than the one without a hole or notch; this does not mean that the protective cap with a hole or notch never detaches from the wire.
On the contrary, the presence of a hole or notch formed at the wire tip increases a hazard when the protective cap detaches. For this reason, it is desirable to enhance the holding strength of the protective cap without forming a hole or notch at the wire tip portion.
More particularly, as illustrated in
However, protective cap 2a is hard to attach unless the size of the hole on the protective cap and that of the wire hook portion have some tolerance. As a result, the wire hook portion has too much play. This weakens the holding strength, causing a detachment of the protective cap during wearing or washing. In addition, the area on the protective cap in which a hole is formed provides much poorer strength than other areas. As a result, the protective cap often disintegrates from the hole thereof during washing.
Hence, in the past, instead of separately molding a protective cap and attaching it to the wire, the insert-molding method was devised as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,306,565 and 5,934,970. This insert-molding of a protective cap enhanced the adherence between the wire and the protective cap, thereby reducing the chance of disintegration during washing.
Nevertheless, the protective cap had a poor holding capacity unless a notch or hole was formed on wire body 1b and a hook was made as illustrated in
The means the inventors developed could successfully enhance the holding strength of the protective cap without processing the wire tip portion. The protective cap is as strong as or stronger than that of the protective cap having a notch or the like formed at the wire tip portion.
The present invention provides a means for improving holding capacity and washing resistance without forming a notch at the tip of a wire or providing insert-molding. In addition, the use of a protective cap in stock provides better productivity than insert-molding.
The above objects, and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent after reading the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
a and 2b are plan views of a conventional wire having a notch at the tip portion thereof to prevent the protective cap from detaching from the wire, wherein
a and 3b are plan views of another conventional brassiere wire, in which a notch is provided at the tip portion of the wire and a protective cap is attached thereto by insert-molding, wherein
a, 4b and 4c illustrate an embodiment of the present invention, wherein
As illustrated in
13.5 kgf when a notch or the like was formed at the tip portion of the wire and protective cap 2 was insert molded;
10.1 kgf when protective cap 2 was attached to the notch free wire and was high frequency bonded;
15.6 kgf when a liquid primer was coated on the tip portion of the notch free wire and protective cap 2 was attached thereto, and high frequency bonding was provided thereto; and
18.7 kgf when a liquid primer was coated onto the tip portion of the notch free wire and protective cap 2 was attached, high frequency bonded, and held thereon while being pressed.
It can be seen that a reasonable strength can be obtained without using a liquid primer. However, after washing which is described next, a significant difference in holding capacity of the protective cap was observed (washing was repeated 25 times using a commercial fully automated washing machine used by AATCC (American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists).
The post-washing holding capacity I was 0.5 kgf when the protective cap was simply high frequency bonded onto the tip portion of the notch free wire without coating with a liquid primer; this holding capacity measured after washing was much poorer than that measured before washing.
The post washing capacity was 2.4 kgf even when a liquid primer was coated and the protective cap was high frequency bonded. This holding capacity is somewhat better than that measured without liquid primer coating, but not up to the pre-washing level. With the liquid primer coating on the wire, high frequency bonding of a protective cap and holding of the protective cap onto the wire while pressing, a good post washing holding capacity of 13.8 kgf was obtained.
As compared to the present invention, the post-washing holding capacity of the protective cap was 12.3 kgf when a notch was formed at the tip portion of a wire and a protective cap was attached by insert-molding. Table 1 illustrates the holding capacities of a protective cap measured under different conditions. It is apparent from the results that the present invention is superior.
It is worth noting that a liquid primer must be selected in accordance with the material of which the protective cap is made. For a nylon elastomer type protective cap used for the present invention, acrylic denatured epoxy type resin mixture is preferable. A typical example of the liquid primer used with the present invention is chemical product W-200 commercially available from Arkema K.K. Tokyo, Japan.
Although a few embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3599643 | Schwartz | Aug 1971 | A |
3605753 | Schwartz | Sep 1971 | A |
3880948 | Chompff | Apr 1975 | A |
4133316 | Schwartz | Jan 1979 | A |
4271580 | King et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4777668 | Weston | Oct 1988 | A |
5730641 | Brown | Mar 1998 | A |
5749767 | Arceo | May 1998 | A |
5830040 | Morgan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5934970 | Morgan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951365 | Fildan | Sep 1999 | A |
6066027 | Fildan | May 2000 | A |
6733854 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | B2 |