This application is based on and hereby claims priority to German Application No. 10 2004 036 279.3 filed on Jul. 27, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Described below is a breaker device for low-voltage applications with at least one fixed contact and at least one movable contact.
Breakers for low-voltage applications are known for example from DE 10 05163 C1, DE 200414892 36 743 44 25 330 A1 or EP 04 50 104 B1. They consist of at least one fixed contact and at least one movable contact with associated drive, which is able to be actuated either in particular electrically or also magnetically and is activated by a specific algorithm. In DE 197 29 599 C1 triggering criteria on the basis of current (I) and current steepness(di/dt) are described, with an advantageous evaluation algorithm being derived from these values.
In known low-voltage power circuit breakers, the main contacts are usually opened via a mechanically operating switching lock. This can be tripped manually at the actuation level—or also automatically by thermal, magnetic or electronic actuators, if these detect an overcurrent. The operating times of the switching lock lie in the range of several ms, so that even in the case of larger short circuits the available electrodynamic forces from the current loop do not lead directly to contact opening, but are initially only directed against the forces of the locked switching lock.
Electronic short circuit breakers can be equipped with what is known as an “electromagnetic bypass” in order to bring about fast actuation with large short circuit currents.
Previously efforts have been made to resolve the problem in a better way than the above-mentioned triggering chain by creating an additional pivot point using an additional support, which however holds the contact closed temporarily with additional springs or guides. Only with extreme currents can electrodynamic forces overcome these spring forces and also bring about a temporary or final opening of the contacts without the aid of a switching lock.
The dimensioning of the switching device must however insure that the switching lock unlocks if there is a fault in the short circuit actuator. In the individual case a different triggering chain can be selected.
After execution of the dynamic processes the main contacts remain open. Many devices also allow temporary opening without there being a final forced opening by the lock.
Using this as its starting point, aspect is to create a breaker device which responds more quickly than in the related art.
This enables an improved breaker device to be implemented. The idea is to use in the new breaker device a specific method for early detection of short circuits in which the impending short circuit is detected at an early stage before it reaches the currents necessary to disengage the contacts. Thus, the operating times of the measurement probes as well as the unlocking mechanism can than be taken into account.
For early short circuit detection methods based on the evaluation of the current i and the current steepness di/dt, i.e. locus curve methods, especially the use of what are known as. “tolerant locus curves (TOK)” in accordance with DE 197 29 599 C are advantageously used. However other methods are also possible, for example traveling wave methods.
As a result, a short circuit is detected by a suitable algorithm early enough to take into account the delay times of the measurement probes as well as the unlocking mechanism, the movable contact is released before or at least at the point in time at which the current lifting forces correspond to the contact force.
Two device concepts are possible within the described framework:
In an advantageous embodiment, the mechanical conditions at the breaker device can be modified and simplified in that
A direct unlocking of the movable contacts is actually additionally provided, and these can be quickly unlocked from the switching lock by an eddy current (=Thomson) drive. Thereafter the current disengagement forces are fully effective and the contacts can be opened rapidly:
These and other objects and advantages will become more apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the exemplary embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
Breaker devices of the related art have a breaker lock which is activated by the overcurrent trigger. Thus opens the contacts against the contact force acting to close them, whereby a mechanical triggering chain is defined. On opening of the contacts, at the latest an equivalent disengagement force is produced between the contacts.
Known breaker devices have previously suffered from that fact that there are or can be current ranges in which the contact force directed to closing is already compensated for by the force operating from the current loop to open the contacts, that levitation of the contacts with arcing already occurs before the actuators unlock the lock.
The arrangement described below provides a remedy:
A latch 5 and a toggle system 6 are assigned to the movable contact 4, with which the contact carrier 3 can be activated. The toggle system 6 is connected via a spring to the housing or to another fixed reference point. The toggle mechanism 6 in
Furthermore in
If necessary other fast-operating methods for early detection of short circuits can also be employed in the KFE 10.
With reference to the flowchart of
Through the current forces operating on the contact system the opening movement is advantageously accelerated. By point in time t3, the current forces exceed the holding or contact forces. The contacts 2, 3 open more quickly in during the time represented by S12. By contact time t4 the contacts 2, 3 are completely opened. The arc then decays by the appropriate end time and the current i is extinguished.
The latter is reflected by the current time curve i(t) in accordance with
From the shape of the timing graph of the current i in
The release is now not related solely to the equilibrium of the forces. The problem which typically arises in this case is that, in the related art, the actuation chain mechanism is too slow to avoid the contacts coming together in the event of a short circuit. It is however sufficient for the lock to open the contacts before these close again because of the lack of inherent dynamics.
With a breaker device with an arrangement as depicted in
Overall the method thus guarantees, that taking into account the operating times of the measurement probes, of the evaluation algorithm and of the unlocking mechanism, the movable contacts are released before or at least at the time at which the current disengagement forces correspond to the contact force.
The present arrangement described for a breaker device with a movable contact able to be pivoted around an axis can also be transferred to breaker devices with bridge contacts.
A description has been provided with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof and examples, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the claims which may include the phrase “at least one of A, B and C” as an alternative expression that means one or more of A, B and C may be used, contrary to the holding in Superguide v. DIRECTV, 358 F3d 870, 69 USPQ2d 1865 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 036 279 | Jul 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/053642 | 7/26/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/15/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/010760 | 2/2/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3824508 | Terracol | Jul 1974 | A |
4042895 | Wafer et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
5694098 | Mody et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5793270 | Beck et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5859579 | Branston et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6313639 | Griepentrog | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6724597 | Elischer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 005 163 | Mar 1957 | DE |
44 25 330 | Jan 1996 | DE |
197 29 599 | Feb 1999 | DE |
0 450 104 | Oct 1991 | EP |
9503619 | Feb 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090046403 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |