Mammography is a well-established method of breast imaging. Using mammograms of the breast, radiologists identify areas suspicious of pathologies. Further identification, such as the determination of cancer is usually done through the taking of a breast biopsy. This is done in several ways. One way is to use mammography to place a wire or needle into the breast, marking the suspected pathology's location. The patient then undergoes an open surgical procedure, and the surgeon can remove tissue from the suspicious area marked by the wire or needle. This is an open surgical biopsy. Another method is known as stereotactic breast biopsy. In this method, using image guidance, a hollow needle is inserted into the breast, and a tissue sample is taken from the area of interest, without a separate surgical procedure. As stated above both methods require some method of localization of the area of interest and a method to direct a wire or needle into the breast so it resides at the already identified area of interest's location.
This patent disclosure covers methods of wire and/or needle guidance into the breast using breast tomosynthesis imaging technology. It covers both upright and prone biopsy equipment.
Tomosynthesis (tomo) is a method of performing three dimensional (3D) breast x-ray imaging. It generates images of cross sectional slices through a compressed breast, and also is used to identify breast pathologies. One of the advantages of tomosynthesis is that the images are three-dimensional, so that once an area of interest is identified in an image, its exact 3D coordinate in the breast can be calculated or estimated, e.g. from the x, y coordinate in the image of a slice and from the z, or depth, coordinate given by the image slice depth location. Another advantage of tomosynthesis is its ability to provide high contrast visibility of objects by the suppression of images from objects at different heights in the breast. Because of its superior contrast visibility, it is expected that there will be pathologies seen on the tomo images that will not be visible using standard x-ray mammography or stereotactic devices or using ultrasound or even MRI or other methods currently employed to provide guidance to the insertion of wires and needles to the location of an identified area of interest. For this reason, it is desired to develop localization methods using tomosynthesis systems that utilize tomosynthesis' natural 3D localization abilities.
This patent disclosure addresses both systems and methods for tomosynthesis imaging, and devices and methods for needle and wire localization using tomosynthesis imaging systems. In one non-limiting example, the new approach described in this patent disclosure is based on conventional tomosynthesis designs, e.g. as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/305,480, filed Nov. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684, issued Oct. 17 2006. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/723,486, filed Nov. 26, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,831,296 issued Nov. 9, 2010, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/628,516, filed Nov. 15, 2004, International. PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/049194, filed Nov. 15, 2005, published as WO/2006/055830 on May 26, 2006, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,296, filed Nov. 26, 2004, and International PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/042613, filed Nov. 23, 2005, published as WO/2006/058160 on Jun. 1, 2006, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Typically, the breast is compressed. between a breast platform and a compression paddle. The paddle may be one of the standard paddles used for screening mammography, or one with holes and guide marks used for needle localization or biopsy procedures with conventional mammography equipment, e.g. as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,142 filed Nov. 21, 1989, U.S. Pat. No. 5,240,011 filed Nov. 27, 1991, U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,169 filed Feb. 17, 1993, U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,264 filed Jun. 7, 1995, U.S. Pat. No. 5,803,912 filed Apr. 25, 1995, U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,325 filed Sep. 4, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 5,289,520 filed Oct. 6, 1992, U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,685 filed Jan. 24, 1994, U.S. Pat. No. 5,594,769 filed May 9, 1995, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,152 filed Feb. 15, 1995, which are hereby incorporated by reference, and as used in the prone or upright needle biopsy devices commercially available from the Lorad Division of Hologic, Inc. of Bedford, Mass. The x-ray tube is mechanically designed so that it moves along a path that images the breast from differing angles, making a sequence of exposures at differing locations along the path. A digital x-ray image receptor acquires the images. The detector can be stationary during the scan, or it can move during the scan such as if it was mounted on a c-arm connected with the x-ray tube or is otherwise connected to move in sync with the x-ray tube, though not necessarily through the same angle. The entire system can be oriented so that the patient is either upright or lying on a table with her breast pendulant and protruding through a hole in the table and positioned properly on the detector to access the area of interest as needed. One system design would be using a relatively small field of view, such as approximately 5×5 cm. This would correspond to developing a tomosynthesis biopsy system with similar field of view to standard prone table stereo localization systems. However, another way disclosed here, which differentiates a tomo biopsy system from conventional stereo localization system; is to use a significantly larger detector field of view. In one example of an embodiment the field of view can be at least 10×10 cm, in another at least 20×25 cm, in another approximately 24×29 cm.
Localization of an area of interest can start with breast acquisition carried out in a standard way used in breast tomosynthesis. The data is reconstructed, and reviewed. The area of interest is identified either on the reconstructed images of slices, or in the raw projection images. The 3D coordinates of the area of interest can be computed or estimated from the identification of the area of interest on the images.
Once the 3D location of the area of interest is calculated, known methods of directing needles and wires to that location can be used.
There might be some differences in tomo scans during biopsy procedures from screening mammography. The dose might be higher, to get lower noise images. The angular range might be wider or shallower, and the number of projections might be larger or smaller. One might want a wider angle, for example, to get higher precision depth discrimination. One might also want higher resolution for these scans, compared to conventional tomo screening. This could be accomplished through the use of smaller pixel sizes.
A biopsy system used with a tomosynthesis system can include a needle gun assembly with motorized or non-motorized stage that can direct a needle to a specific 3D coordinate in the breast. This stage may be swung or otherwise moved out of the way of the acquisition system during the initial tomosynthesis scan, so that if desired it does not shadow or interfere with the visualization of the breast or breast area of interest.
Following the tomo scan and the identification of the 3D area of interest location, the stage is moved into place. The needle is moved to the 3D coordinate previously identified. The needle may access in the breast via a left or right lateral access (e.g. with the needle roughly parallel to the compression paddle and the patient's chest wall), or it could access the breast with the needle roughly normal to the compression paddle, through an opening in the compression paddle. Or, the needle may enter the breast at an angle between the normal and parallel paths (in relation to the compression paddle and detector) through a hole in the breast compression paddle. It may also come from the front of the breast, directing the needle rearwards towards the chest wall. It can also come from between the paddle and the breast platform but at an angle rather than through the hole in the paddle.
The biopsy system should be capable of working with the tomosynthesis system in all orientations of the tomosynthesis system, including, but not limited to, CC, MLO, and ML and LM imaging orientations. These systems can rotate 360° around the breast and take images from any angle.
Standard techniques of breast biopsy typically involve verification of the needle's location before tissue sampling, known as pre- and post-fire verification. In pre-fire, the needle is inserted into the breast approximately 2 cm short of the center of the area of interest and x-ray exposures are made and images are generated and viewed to verify proper pre-fire needle location relative to the area of interest before tissue sampling. In post-fire, at least one additional exposure is made and the resulting image is viewed to verify proper needle location relative to the area of interest after the firing of the needle and before the tissue is sampled.
These verification images can be images from tomosynthesis scans, or they can be stereo x-ray pairs or individual images. The tomosynthesis scans can be done with different angular ranges and different number of projections and a different dose from conventional tomosynthesis imaging.
Post-fire needle verification can be accomplished in a variety of ways, which may depend on whether the needle access was lateral or tangential. One challenge arises from the fact that the gun and stage and needle are generally radio-opaque and can contribute artifacts to the images if not properly dealt with.
With tangential access, there may be an angular range where the gun and stage shadow the breast. Lateral access may not have the problem of the gun stage in the field of view, but it can have the needle in the field of view, and there might be other mechanics that if imaged can create image artifacts. In general, x-rays from angles that shadow the gun and stage are less useful. Solutions to this problem in accordance with the new approach disclosed in this patent specification include:
a. Development of needle and other sheathing materials that are sufficiently radiolucent that they will not create significant image artifacts. Possible materials are plastics, ceramics, glasses, carbon tubes, and low atomic number metals and other materials. If these materials are used, they can be marked with fiducial markings such as radio-opaque rings or dots allowing visibility in the tomosynthesis images so they can be differentiated from breast tissue or breast area of interest. Alternately, a needle can be used where only the tip (last 1-3 cm) is radiolucent and rest of the needle is radio-opaque.
b. Scanning through angles that do not shadow these objects. This can entail an asymmetric scan geometry, whereby all or an important part of the x-ray beam path does not pass through the needle or other radio-opaque parts. An example is scanning to just one side of the needle.
c. Scanning over a large range, and generally or always avoiding x-ray exposures when the stage or other radio-opaque parts shadow the breast, area of interest or image receptor. Alternatively, x-ray imaging can be done even in angular areas with this shadow problem, but these exposures can be eliminated from viewing or reconstruction, either automatically or through manual elimination via a user interface. Another alternate method involves artifact suppression algorithms used during reconstruction, as in known in tomosynthesis and CT scanning.
d. Stereotactic imaging. Conventional stereotactic imaging involves using a pair of x-ray images at, for example, ±15° to the normal to the compression paddle. This geometry involves sufficiently large angles to typically avoid the stage shadows on the image receptor. A tomo system can be used to take tomo projection images at angles that avoid undesirable shadows at relevant parts of the images.
e. Scan angle changes. A larger scan angle than used in conventional tomo imaging can better avoid artifacts from the stage.
f. Bringing the needle to a fixed distance from the lesion. An image can then be taken that does not obscure the area of interest, and the proper distance between needle and area of interest can be verified from imaging. The needle can then be advanced into the correct location within the area of interest based on information from the tomo or conventional imaging while the needle is spaced from the area of interest.
g. In many if not most cases the projection images and perhaps the reconstructed images of breast slices will contain at some location an image of the needle. The needle image can create artifacts in reconstructed images, which can be removed via artifact reduction algorithms as in known in conventional tomosynthesis and CT imaging. One algorithm can involve skipping projection images with extensive shadowing in the projections. Another algorithm can involve segmenting out the needle and other high contrast objects and avoiding reconstruction using these pixels, as has been used in CT and other imaging. Other alternatives include viewing the projection images, which can have images of the needles but no other significant artifacts.
The examples embodiments disclosed in this patent specification can include user interfaces to mark the area of interest location on either the projection tomo images or the reconstructed tomb images of breast slices. Signals directing the needle to the correct location in the breast can be generated automatically based on identifying the location of the area of interest in the images, or the coordinates of the area of interest can be displayed and the needle can be guided to the appropriate location under manual control.
For the pre and post fire images, a facility can be provided to mark the previously identified area of interest location on the current images. This can help visualization of proper needle placement, in case the area of interest becomes harder to see because it has been removed or in case the needle creates large artifacts. The orientation of the needle relative to this mark can provide assurance as to proper location placement.
The 3D nature of the tomosynthesis images allows for calculation of the 3D volume of the area of interest, once it has been identified on the tomosynthesis projections or reconstructed images of slices. This can be part of the display and used to help verify that the correct lesion has been targeted.
A patient's breast 12 is compressed between paddle 10 and support plate 14 and a needle biopsy stage 16 has been used to position the tip of a biopsy needle 18 near an area of interest 20 in breast 12. In this example needle 18 enters the breast 12 generally laterally, i.e. along the plane of support plate 14 and along the chest wall of the patient, and from the left as seen in the drawing. Of course, the needle 18 can enter instead from the right, and need not be exactly parallel to support plate 14 or to the chest wall, but can be at any angle thereto that the health professional doing the needle biopsy finds suitable for the particular patient or area of interest location. As described above, the location of area of interest 20 has been determined based on tomosynthesis images that can be tomo projection images and/or tomo reconstructed slice images. In
During the x-ray tomo exposure, metallic breast biopsy needles can obstruct the sampled lesion or cause other undesirable artifacts such as, for example, streaking artifacts in reconstructed tomosynthesis images. This is especially acute where the sampled lesions are calcifications. This obstruction can reduce the accuracy of biopsy. Embodiments of the present disclosure include a needle design that allows for better visibility of the sampled lesion.
Several embodiments of such needles are shown m
Additional examples of breast biopsy needles are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,638,235, 6,758,824, 6,620,111 and 6,626,849 and U.S. Publications Nos. 2006/0155209 A1, 2006/0129062 A1, 2006/0030784 AI, 2005/0113715 A1, 2005/0049521 A1, and 2004/0267157 A1, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Thus, in one aspect this patent specification discloses a method and a system in which tomosynthesis reconstructed images of slices of a patient's breast and/or tomosynthesis projection images of the breast are used to (1) identify the location of a suspected area of interest in the breast, (2) guide needle biopsy of the area of interest, (3) confirm pre-fire position of the needle relative to the area of interest, and/or (4) confirm post-fire position of the needle relative to the area of interest. One unique benefit of this approach is with respect to suspected pathologies that can be seen or assessed better in tomosynthesis images than in conventional mammograms or in conventional ultrasound images of breast tissue. The method and system involve taking a series of tomosynthesis projection images at respective different angles of the imaging x-ray beam relative to the breast, for example in the manner disclosed in said patent applications that are incorporated by reference in this patent specification. The information from these projection images is reconstructed into images of slices through the breast, which may represent slices of selected thickness and selected angles relative to the breast platform or the imaging plane(s) of the projection images. Typically but not necessarily the reconstructed images represent slices that are parallel to the breast platform and thus to the plane of a conventional mammogram. These images are used to identify the location of the area of interest in the breast in three dimensions, for example by having the health professional point to the location of the area of interest in one or more images and using the system to compute the 3D coordinates of the location in a manner similar to that used in said biopsy system patents identified above and incorporated by reference in this patent specification, or in a different manner, such as by pointing to the area of interest in a reconstructed slice image to thereby identify the location of the area of interest in two dimensions in the plane of the slice and to provide the third dimension from knowledge of the depth of the slice in the breast. This 3D information of the area of interest location can be used together with information regarding a geometrical relationship between the equipment in which the breast of compressed and immobilized to determine the direction and extent of biopsy needle motion executed by a needle stage in a manner similar to that disclosed in said patents incorporated by reference herein, to position the needle, to sample the area of interest and to confirm pre-fire and post-fire locations of the needle relative to the area of interest.
In order to reduce undesirable artifacts in the x-ray images due to the presence of radio-opaque objects such as the biopsy needle in the imaging x-ray beam, the method and system disclosed here employ new approaches either singly or in combinations or subcombinations with each other. A first new approach in this respect pertains to selection of tomosynthesis images and involves taking projection tomosynthesis images only at angles in which the radio-opaque objects are not in the imaging x-ray beam or, if they are in the beam, their effect in the image is significantly less than it would have been for other possible beam angles. This may involve not taking projection images at angles that would produce more undesirable artifacts and/or taking such projection images but not using them in reconstructing slice images. A second new approach that can be used instead of or in addition to the first one is to carry out post-processing of the tomo images to reduce artifact therein due to the presence of radio-opaque objects in the beam. This can involve processing of the reconstructed slice image, e.g. by using streak artifact removal algorithms similar to those conventionally used in CT (computerized tomography) technology, and/or image processing of the tomo projection images to remove or reduce such artifacts. A third new approach that can be used instead of one or more of the first and second, or together with one or both of the first and second, is to use biopsy equipment that reduces or avoids such image artifacts, e.g. a biopsy needle that is made at least partly of a material that is significantly more x-ray transparent than conventional biopsy needles. A needle made of such material can be used as is for insertion into the breast and for tissue sampling, or it may be stiffened by portions of an x-ray opaque material such as metal that are used for insertion and/or tissue sampling but are withdrawn from the breast or at least from the immediate vicinity of the area of interest before pre-fire and/or post-fire x-ray images can be taken to thereby avoid the image artifacts that such metal would cause if not withdrawn. As one example, such stiffening portions can be in the form of pins or ribs inside a cannula. As another example, they can be sleeves coaxial with a cannula and/or a stylet. Other examples of stiffening portions that are withdrawn before pre-fire and/or post fire imaging also are contemplated.
Additional features can be added. For example, in the system 100 shown in
In one example (
In the case that the collection filter is integrated with the biopsy needle in a handheld device or in a needle stage, the x-ray tube and detector would be small-scaled. An example of a small scale detector is available from Hamamatsu, Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey (see http://sales.hamamatsu.com/en/products/electron-tube-division/x-ray-products/x-ray-flat-panel-sensor.php). Information regarding a small scale x-ray tube (40 kV metal-ceramic X-ray tube from Newton Scientific Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts) is available at http://www.newtonscientificinc.com/swans.htm.
For a given position of breast 102a, such as a position that is the same or similar to the CC position for a conventional mammogram, source 100a and receptor 110a can be positioned relative to immobilized breast 102a such that at the 0° position a center ray of the x-ray beam from source 100a would be substantially normal to receptor breast platform 106a and receptor 110a. For a first set of image data, source 100a is at +(or −) 15° in a preferred example, and is gradually moved; continuously or intermittently to −(or +) 15°, with a set of image data taken every 3°. The angular range and the increment over which data sets are taken can each be selectively set by the operator, depending of characteristics of the breast being imaged and the screening and diagnostic needs, and can be different for different patients or from one to the other breast of the same patient. For example the source can move through angles that range from a fraction to a degree to several degrees from one imaging position to the next. Each set of image data is supplied by image readout 216 for processing at image reconstruction and display unit 218. Each set of image data can be taken at the same x-ray dose to the breast, and the dose at any one of the different imaging positions can be substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. The x-ray dose can be substantially the same for each imaging position, but preferably the dose at one of the position, e.g., at or close to the 0° position, is the same or similar to dose for a conventional mammogram while the dose at the each of the other positions is less, preferably much less. Alternatively, the scan can begin with or end with an exposure close to the 0° position at a dose similar to a conventional mammogram, and the rest of the set of image data can be over the angular range with each exposure at an x-ray dose that is substantially less than that for a conventional mammogram. Thus, two types of images can be produced in accordance with the currently preferred embodiment while breast 102a is immobilized in the same position. One type is the same or is at least similar to a conventional mammogram, which can be read and interpreted in the manner familiar to health professionals. The other type is tomosynthetic images reconstructed from the image data and displayed either separately or as an adjunct to the display of the image that is the same or similar to a conventional mammogram. The process described above for one position of breast 102a can be repeated for another position. For example one process can be for a breast position in a manner that is the same or similar to positioning the breast for a conventional CC view, the breast can then be released, the support 204 and C-arm 200 rotated to other angular positions and the breast repositioned in a manner that is the same and similar to the position for an MLO view, and the procedure repeated.
An alternative embodiment, illustrated schematically in a front view in
The remote view and display box receives the spatial coordinates of rotation, angulation, and depth from the biopsy needle positioning motor controller and displays them for the benefit of the clinician user or others on a 40-character alphanumeric display. The remote view and display box may be conveniently mounted on a table that includes means for mounting and lighting x-ray reference films to be viewed during a breast biopsy procedure.
Operation of the biopsy needle positioning motor controller may be understood with reference to the detailed block diagram of
A central processing unit (8032 CPU) within the biopsy needle positioning motor controller has a direct serial communications link with the remote view and display box through an RS422 serial transmitter U29. The 8032 CPU also has two bi-directional communications links through a dual synchronous universal transmitter/receiver DUART, which provides serial communications between the biopsy needle positioning motor controller and both the film digitizer and coordinates calculator (serial channel B) and the operator hand controller (serial channel A).
Under normal operating conditions, the 8032 CPU loads the three DC motor controller sections (rotation, angulation, and depth) with high level initial conditions data. This initial conditions data includes velocity constants, acceleration constants, PID filter information, and sample period. When the spatial coordinates of the identified point of interest within the patient's breast, as computed by the film digitizer and coordinates calculator, are placed on the data bus ADO-AD7 by DUART U11, the 8032 CPU reads these spatial coordinates and calculates the corresponding motor control values. The 8032 CPU then sends this data to the three motor control sections. The motor control sections calculate the actual motor drive voltages and provide the drive voltages to motors 12a, 14a, and 16a through separate H-bridge circuits. The motor control sections monitor the encoder feedback from the biopsy needle positioning mechanism to determine the position of the biopsy needle and to adjust the motor drive voltages as the biopsy needle reaches the identified point of interest. A typical motor voltage and velocity profile is trapezoidal in nature, ramping up to a start voltage, then holding constant, and finally ramping down to a stop voltage when the biopsy needle has reached the position required for insertion to the identified point of interest.
The 8032 CPU support circuits include operating and debug program data in erasable programmable read-only memories EPROMs U1 and U6. Fourteen status bits plus a six-bit DIP switch are monitored through an input port and a random access memory RAM U15. The status bits include +/−limit switches and a home switch associated with each coordinate axis. Two additional status bits serve to monitor the +5-volt (+5ENC) and +24-volt (+24VOK) power supplies. A reset circuit U23 provides a reset signal to reset the 8032 CPU when power is initially applied. The reset circuit also monitors program execution by counting a pulse associated with each cycle of the program and by executing a CPU reset command if the pulses stop, as may occur during a software lockup.
Referring now to
The clinician user initiates control of the biopsy needle positioning mechanism in either an automatic or manual mode by depressing control switches on the operator hand controller. Depressing one of the arrow keys or one of the MANUAL, OFFSET or TARGET keys has the effect of grounding a corresponding input of serial encoder U 13. This causes serial encoder U13 to apply an 1INTERRUPT 0 (1NTOO) to the CPU U9 and place the serial data in 12C protocol on the serial lines SDA and. SCL to the CPU U9. The CPU U9 converts the switch information to RS422 protocol and sends it to the biopsy needle positioning motor controller via serial transmitter U15. Each of the keys on the operator hand controller contains a light emitting diode LED that is illuminated under the control of the biopsy needle positioning motor controller. The biopsy needle positioning motor controller selects a particular LED to be illuminated, sets the brightness of that LED, and determines how long that LED is to remain illuminated. This information is sent to the CPU U9 via serial receiver U15. The CPU U9 then places the information in 12C protocol on the serial lines SDA and SCL to be transmitted to serial decoder/driver U14. Serial decoder/driver U14 pulls a corresponding output to its low state, thereby illuminating the selected LED. The CPU U9 controls the brightness of the LEDs on the operator hand controller by setting the duty cycle of BRIGHTNESS (BL) pulses applied to the LEDS. A 50% duty cycle illuminates the LEDs at half brightness and a 100% duty cycle illuminates the LEDs at full brightness.
The position readout displays U1-U8 in the operator hand controller provide two rows of displayed information comprising 16 ASCII characters in each row. Each row comprises four display devices, and each display device contains four 5.times.7 dot matrix character displays. Referring to
In addition, an additional line 106 can be added for introducing anesthetic and/or contrast agents, for example, along with a flushing agent or lavage. The introduction of the anesthetic and/or contrast agents can be automated and synchronized to the imaging sequence.
Many variations can be introduced on the above-discussed illustrative embodiments and examples without departing from the spirit of the disclosure or from the scope of the appended claims. For example, elements and/or features of different examples and illustrative embodiments may be combined with each other and/or substituted for each other within the scope of this disclosure and appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/434,064, filed Jun. 6, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,452,486, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/904,735, filed Feb. 26, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,335,094, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/021,624, filed Sep. 9, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,901,309, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/707,587 filed Feb. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,532,745, which claims Priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/774,142, filed Feb. 15, 2006. To the extent appropriate, a claim for priority is made to each of the above-recited applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels | Jul 1979 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4727565 | Ericson | Feb 1988 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch | May 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4907156 | Doi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969174 | Schied | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5099846 | Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5129911 | Siczek et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133020 | Giger et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5219351 | Teubner | Jun 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280427 | Magnusson | Jan 1994 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5343390 | Doi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webbe | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5386447 | Siczek | Jan 1995 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick | Sep 1995 | A |
5491627 | Zhang et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499097 | Ortyn et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzki | Jan 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642433 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642441 | Riley et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647025 | Frost et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660185 | Shmulewitz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5671288 | Wilhelm et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5712890 | Spivey | Jan 1998 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763871 | Ortyn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773832 | Sayed et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz | Oct 1998 | A |
5835079 | Shieh | Nov 1998 | A |
5841124 | Ortyn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875258 | Ortyn et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5878746 | Lemelson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5941832 | Tumey | Aug 1999 | A |
5954650 | Saito | Sep 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro | Nov 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067079 | Shieh | May 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers | Jul 2000 | A |
6101236 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102866 | Nields et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215892 | Douglass et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavus | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Sheperd | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245028 | Furst et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327377 | Rutenberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389104 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6424332 | Powell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442288 | Haerer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463181 | Duarte | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468226 | McIntyre, IV | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480565 | Ning | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556655 | Chichereau | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574304 | Hsieh | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Barnes | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650928 | Gailly | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6683934 | Zhao | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6744848 | Stanton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6901156 | Giger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912319 | Barnes | May 2005 | B1 |
6940943 | Claus | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987331 | Koeppe | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022075 | Grunwald et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025725 | Dione et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030861 | Westerman | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7110490 | Eberhard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117098 | Dunlay et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | OpDeBeek | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7218766 | Eberhard | May 2007 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289825 | Fors et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298881 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7346381 | Okerlund et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7406150 | Minyard et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466795 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7577282 | Gkanatsios et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606801 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616801 | Gkanatsios et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634050 | Muller et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640051 | Krishnan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7697660 | Ning | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705830 | Westerman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760924 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769219 | Zahniser | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787936 | Kressy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809175 | Roehrig et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828733 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831296 | DeFreitas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869563 | DeFreitas | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7974924 | Holla et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991106 | Ren et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8044972 | Hall et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051386 | Rosander et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8126226 | Bernard et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155421 | Ren et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165365 | Bernard et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8532745 | DeFreitas et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8571289 | Ruth | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594274 | Hoernig et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8677282 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8712127 | Ren et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8897535 | Ruth et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8983156 | Periaswamy et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9020579 | Smith | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9075903 | Marshall | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084579 | Ren et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9119599 | Itai | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129362 | Jerebko | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9289183 | Karssemeijer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9451924 | Bernard | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456797 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9478028 | Parthasarathy | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9589374 | Gao | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9592019 | Sugiyama | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9805507 | Chen | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9808215 | Ruth et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9811758 | Ren et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9901309 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10008184 | Kreeger et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10010302 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10092358 | DeFreitas | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10111631 | Gkanatsios | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10242490 | Karssemeijer | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10335094 | DeFreitas | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357211 | Smith | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10410417 | Chen et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10413263 | Ruth et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10444960 | Marshall | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10456213 | DeFreitas | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10573276 | Kreeger et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10575807 | Gkanatsios | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10595954 | DeFreitas | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10624598 | Chen | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10977863 | Chen | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10978026 | Kreeger | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11419565 | Gkanatsios | Aug 2022 | B2 |
11508340 | Kreeger | Nov 2022 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038861 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsuji | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inoue | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113681 | Byram | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122533 | Marie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188466 | Barrette et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193676 | Bodicker | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007598 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026386 | Tang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048260 | Matusis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097055 | Yanof | May 2003 | A1 |
20030128893 | Castorina | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135115 | Burdette et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169847 | Karellas | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195433 | Turovskiy | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212327 | Wang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008809 | Webber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008900 | Jabri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008901 | Avinash | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036680 | Davis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047518 | Tiana | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052328 | Saboi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064037 | Smith | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066884 | Hermann Claus | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070582 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077938 | Mark et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081273 | Ning | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109028 | Stern et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127789 | Ogawa | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138569 | Grunwald | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171933 | Stoller et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047636 | Gines et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084060 | Seppi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089205 | Kapur | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105679 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107689 | Sasano | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111718 | MacMahon | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124845 | Thomadsen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060009693 | Hanover et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018526 | Avinash | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025680 | Jeune-Iomme | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132508 | Sadikali | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147099 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210131 | Wheeler | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228012 | Masuzawa | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238546 | Handley | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257009 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269040 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274928 | Collins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019846 | Bullitt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046649 | Reiner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070052700 | Wheeler et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114424 | Danielsson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118400 | Morita et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156451 | Gering | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236490 | Casteele | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263765 | Wu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274585 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043905 | Hassanpourgol | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101537 | Sendai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114614 | Mahesh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125643 | Huisman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139896 | Baumgart | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152086 | Hall | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165136 | Christie et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187095 | Boone et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198966 | Hjarn | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221479 | Ritchie | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229256 | Shibaike | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240533 | Piron et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297482 | Weiss | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | DeFreitas | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005668 | West et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005693 | Brauner | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034684 | Bernard | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037821 | O'Neal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090079705 | Sizelove et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080604 | Shores et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080752 | Ruth | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080765 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087067 | Khorasani | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123052 | Ruth | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129644 | Daw et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138280 | Morita et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143674 | Nields | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167702 | Nurmi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171244 | Ning | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090238424 | Arakita | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259958 | Ban | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278812 | Yasutake | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034348 | Yu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049046 | Peiffer | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079405 | Bernstein | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088346 | Urness et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098214 | Star-Lack et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105879 | Katayose et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121178 | Krishnan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131294 | Venon | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131482 | Linthicum et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135558 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152570 | Navab | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166267 | Zhang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208037 | Sendai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231522 | Li | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246909 | Blum | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100259561 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259645 | Kaplan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260316 | Stein et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280375 | Zhang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293500 | Cragun | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110018817 | Kryze | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019891 | Puong | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054944 | Sandberg et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069808 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069906 | Park | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087132 | DeFreitas et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105879 | Masumoto | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109650 | Kreeger | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110576 | Kreeger | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125526 | Gustafson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150447 | Li | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163939 | Tam et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178389 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182402 | Partain | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234630 | Batman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237927 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242092 | Kashiwagi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110310126 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014504 | Jang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014578 | Karssemeijer | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120069951 | Toba | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106698 | Karim | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131488 | Karlsson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133600 | Marshall | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133601 | Marshall | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134464 | Hoernig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148151 | Hamada | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120189092 | Jerebko | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194425 | Buelow | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238870 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120293511 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130022165 | Jang | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044861 | Muller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059758 | Haick | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108138 | Nakayama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121569 | Yadav | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121618 | Yadav | May 2013 | A1 |
20130202168 | Jerebko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259193 | Packard | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033126 | Kreeger | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035811 | Guehring | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064444 | Oh | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073913 | DeFreitas et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140219534 | Wiemker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219548 | Wels | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140327702 | Kreeger et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140328517 | Gluncic | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150052471 | Chen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150061582 | Smith | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150238148 | Georgescu | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150302146 | Marshall | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309712 | Marshall | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317538 | Ren et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150331995 | Zhao | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160000399 | Halmann et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022364 | DeFreitas et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160051215 | Chen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160078645 | Abdurahman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160140749 | Erhard | May 2016 | A1 |
20160228034 | Gluncic | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160235380 | Smith | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160367210 | Gkanatsios | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170071562 | Suzuki | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170262737 | Rabinovich | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180047211 | Chen et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180137385 | Ren | May 2018 | A1 |
20180144244 | Masoud | May 2018 | A1 |
20180256118 | Defreitas | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190015173 | DeFreitas | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043456 | Kreeger | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190290221 | Smith | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200046303 | DeFreitas | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200093562 | DeFreitas | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200184262 | Chui | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200205928 | DeFreitas | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200253573 | Gkanatsios | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200345320 | Chen | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210100518 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210113167 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118199 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20220005277 | Chen | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220013089 | Kreeger | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220192615 | Chui | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220386969 | Smith | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230053489 | Kreeger | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230054121 | Chui | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230056692 | Gkanatsios | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230082494 | Chui | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230125385 | Solis | Apr 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014339982 | Apr 2015 | AU |
1846622 | Oct 2006 | CN |
202161328 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102429678 | May 2012 | CN |
107440730 | Dec 2017 | CN |
102010009295 | Aug 2011 | DE |
102011087127 | May 2013 | DE |
775467 | May 1997 | EP |
982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2236085 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2215600 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2301432 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2491863 | Aug 2012 | EP |
1986548 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2656789 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2823464 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2823765 | Jan 2015 | EP |
3060132 | Apr 2019 | EP |
H09-198490 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H09-238934 | Sep 1997 | JP |
H10-33523 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2000-200340 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2002-109510 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-282248 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-189179 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-199737 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-531516 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2004254742 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-519634 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-312026 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-130487 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-330334 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2007-536968 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-068032 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009-034503 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-522005 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009-526618 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-207545 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-137004 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011-110175 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2012501750 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012011255 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-061196 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-244211 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2014-507250 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014-534042 | Dec 2014 | JP |
2015-506794 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2015-144632 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2016-198197 | Dec 2015 | JP |
10-2015-0010515 | Jan 2015 | KR |
10-2017-0062839 | Jun 2017 | KR |
9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
9317620 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9406352 | Mar 1994 | WO |
199700649 | Jan 1997 | WO |
199816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2003020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007095330 | Aug 2007 | WO |
08014670 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008014670 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008047270 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008054436 | May 2008 | WO |
2009026587 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010028208 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010059920 | May 2010 | WO |
2011008239 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011043838 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011065950 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011073864 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011091300 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012001572 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012068373 | May 2012 | WO |
2012063653 | May 2012 | WO |
2012112627 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122399 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013001439 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013035026 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013078476 | May 2013 | WO |
2013123091 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014080215 | May 2014 | WO |
2014149554 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014207080 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015061582 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015066650 | May 2015 | WO |
2015130916 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016103094 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016184746 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2018183548 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018183549 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018183550 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018236565 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2021021329 | Feb 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bushberg, Jerrold et al., “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging”, 3rd ed., In: “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Third Edition”, Dec. 28, 2011, Lippincott & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA, XP05579051, pp. 270-272. |
Dromain, Clarisse et al., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results”, European Radiology, Sep. 14, 2010, vol. 21, pp. 565-574. |
Reynolds, April, “Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: A Review”, Radiologic Technology, vol. 80, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2009, pp. 447M-464M, XP055790574. |
“Filtered Back Projection”, (NYGREN), published May 8, 2007, URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/˜elec539/Projects97/cult/node2.html, 2 pgs. |
Berg WA et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer”, JAMA 299:2151-2163, 2008. |
Canadian Office Action in Application 2829349, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 4 pages. |
Carton AK, et al., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis—a feasibility study”, BR J Radiol. Apr. 2010;83 (988):344-50. |
Chen SC, et al., “Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis”, Acad Radio. Feb. 2007 14(2):229-38. |
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201480058064.5, dated Jul. 16, 2019, 5 pgs. |
Diekmann F., et al., “Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement”, Invest Radiol 2005; 40:397-404. |
Dromain C., et al., “Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multi-reader study”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting. |
Dromain C., et al., “Contrast-enhanced digital mammography”, Eur J Radiol. 2009; 69:34-42. |
European Communication in Application 10707751.3, mailed Oct. 4, 2018, 5 pages. |
European Communication in Application 10707751.3, dated Aug. 7, 2019, 6 pages. |
European Extended Search Report dated Jul. 18, 2014 in EP App 12754521.8, 7 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14770362.3 dated Sep. 28, 2016, 8 pgs. |
European Extended Search Report in Application 14855181.5, dated May 15, 2017, 7 pages. |
European extended Search Report in Application 18153706.9, dated Jun. 1, 2018, 8 pages. |
European Mar. 23, 2009 European Search Report in connection with counterpart European patent Application No. 07750818. |
European Office Action in Application 10707751.3, dated Feb. 19, 2018, 5 pgs. |
Freiherr G., “Breast tomosynthesis trials show promise”, Diagnostic Imaging—San Francisco 2005, V27; N4:42-48. |
Giger, M. et al., “An “Intelligent” Workstation for Computer-aided Diagnosis”, RadioGraphics, (1993), 13(3): 647-656. |
Giger, M. et al., “Development of a “smart” workstation for use in mammography”, Proceedings of SPIE, (1991), 45: 101-103. |
Hologic, “Lorad StereoLoc II” Operator's Manual 9-500-0261, Rev. 005, 2004, 78 pgs. |
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Nov. 28, 2010, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. |
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Aug. 14, 2012, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. |
ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 12 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection in Application 2016-526115, dated Jun. 24, 2019, 5 pages. |
Jochelson M., et al, “Bilateral Dual Energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial Experience”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting, 1 page. |
Jong, RA, et al., Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003; 228:842-850. |
Kopans, et.al. Will tomosynthesis replace conventional mammography? Plenary Session SFN08: RSNA 2005. |
Lehman CD, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303. |
Lewin JM, et al., Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003; 229:261-268. |
Lindfors KK, et al., Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2008; 246(3): 725-733. |
Niklason, L., et al., Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. Nov. 1997; 205(2):399-406. |
Observations by Third Party, Remarks concerning European patent application No. 10707751.3 according to Article 115 EPC, dated Apr. 24, 2014, 8 pgs. |
PCT Feb. 20, 2008 International Search Report and Written Opinion in connection with corresponding International patent application No. PCT/US2007/04006, 7 pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application PCT/US2014/061994, dated Apr. 26, 2016, 5 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application PCT/US2010/025873, dated Aug. 2, 2010, 19 pgs. |
PCT International Search Report in Application PCT/US2014/026164, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 1 page. |
PCT International Written Report for International Application PCT/US2014/026164, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 12 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2014/061994, dated Jan. 22, 2015, 4 pages. |
PCT/US12/28334 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 5, 2012, 7 pages. |
Poplack SP, et al, Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenology Sep. 2007 189(3):616-23. |
Prionas ND, et al., Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. Sep. 2010 256(3):714-723. |
Rafferty E. et al., “Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Full-Field Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone: Results” . . . presented at 2007 Radiological Society of North America meeting, Chicago IL. |
Shrading, Simone et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Experiences and Comparison with Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy”, the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Univ. of Aachen, Germany, published Nov. 12, 2014, 10 pgs. |
Smith, A., Full field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manage. Sep.-Oct. 2005; 27(5):25-31. |
Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 324:1-8. |
Weidner N, The importance of tumor angiogenesis: the evidence continues to grow. Am J Clin Pathol. Nov. 2004 122(5):696-703. |
“Supersonic to feature Aixplorer Ultimate at ECR”, AuntiMinnie.com, 3 pages (Feb. 2018). |
Kopans, Daniel B., “Breast Imaging”, 3rd Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, published Nov. 2, 2006, pp. 960-967. |
Williams, Mark B. et al., “Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography”, Medical Physics 35, 2414 (May 20, 2008); doi: 10.1118/1.2912177, pp. 2414-2423. |
Elbakri, Idris A. et al., “Automatic exposure control for a slot scannong full field digital mammagraphy system”, Med. Phys. Sep. 2005; 32(9):2763-2770, Abstract only. |
Feng, Steve Si Jia, et al., “Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: Dosimetric Characterization”, Radiology, Apr. 2012, 263(1); pp. 35-42. |
Samani, A. et al., “Biomechanical 3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Human Breast Using MRI Data”, 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 271-279. |
Yin, H.M., et al., “Image Parser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images”, BioMedical Engineering Online. 3:31, pp. 1-9, Oct. 1, 2004. |
Sakic et al., “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation” Medical Physics. 29, pp. 2131-2139 (2002). |
Wodajo, Felasfa, MD, “Now Playing: Radiology Images from Your Hospital PACS on your iPad,” Mar. 17, 2010; web site: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2010/03/now-playing-radiology-images-from-your-hospital-pacs-on-your-ipad/, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (3 pages). |
Pathmanathan et al., “Predicting tumour location by simulating large deformations of the breast using a 3D finite element model and nonlinear elasticity”, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 217-224, vol. 3217 (2004). |
Al Sallab et al., “Self Learning Machines Using Deep Networks”, Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 2011 Int'l. Conference of IEEE, Oct. 14, 2011, pp. 21-26. |
Caroline, B.E. et al., “Computer aided detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: A review”, 2012 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Science, Engineering and Technology (INCOSET), Tiruchirappalli, 2012, pp. 186-191. |
Ertas, M. et al., “2D versus 3D total variation minimization in digital breast tomosynthesis”, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), Macau, 2015, pp. 1-4. |
Ghiassi, M. et al., “A Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Networks”, Neurocomputing, vol. 63, Aug. 20, 2004, pp. 397-413. |
Chan, “ROC Study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions,” Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005. |
Lilja, Mikko, “Fast and accurate voxel projection technique in free-form cone-beam geometry with application to algebraic reconstruction,” Applies Sciences on Biomedical and Communication Technologies, 2008, Isabel '08, first international symposium on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 25, 2008. |
Pediconi, “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of new software for MR-based breast imaging,” International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086. |
EFilm Mobile HD by Merge Healthcare, web site: http://itunes.apple.com/bw/app/efilm-mobile-hd/id405261243?mt=8, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (2 pages). |
EFilm Solutions, eFilm Workstation (tm) 3.4, website: http://estore.merge.com/na/estore/content.aspx?productID=405, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (2 pages). |
Burbank, Fred, “Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Its History, Its Present, and Its Future”, published in 1996 at the Southeastern Surgical Congress, 24 pages. |
E. Shaw de Paredes et al., “Interventional Breast Procedure”, published Sep./Oct. 1998 in Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, pp. 138-184. |
Fischer Imaging Corp, Mammotest Plus manual on minimally invasive breast biopsy system, 2002, 8 pages. |
Fischer Imaging Corporation, Installation Manual, MammoTest Family of Breast Biopsy Systems, 86683G, 86684G, P-55957-IM, Issue 1, Revision 3, Jul. 2005, 98 pages. |
Fischer Imaging Corporation, Operator Manual, Mammo Test Family of Breast Biopsy Systems, 86683G, 86684G, P-55956-OM, Issue 1, Revision 6, Sep. 2005, 258 pages. |
Georgian-Smith, Dianne, et al., “Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System”, 2001, at the American Roentgen Ray Society meeting, 8 pages. |
Koechli, Ossi R., “Available Sterotactic Systems for Breast Biopsy”, Renzo Brun del Re (Ed.), Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsies, Recent Results in Cancer Research 173:105-113; Springer-Verlag, 2009. |
Conner, Peter, “Breast Response to Menopausal Hormone Therapy—Aspects on Proliferation, apoptosis and Mammographic Density”, 2007 Annals of Medicine, 39;1, 28-41. |
Glick, Stephen J., “Breast CT”, Annual Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2007, 9;501-26. |
Metheany, Kathrine G. et al., “Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images”, Oct. 2008, Med. Phys. 35 (10); 4685-4694. |
Dromain, Clarisse, et al., “Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography”, AJR: 187, Nov. 2006, 16 pages. |
Zhao, Bo, et al., “Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system”, May 2008, Med. Phys 35(5); 1978-1987. |
Mahesh, Mahadevappa, “AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents—Digital Mammography: An Overview”, Nov.-Dec. 2004, vol. 24, No. 6, 1747-1760. |
Zhang, Yiheng et al., “A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosythesis”, Med Phys., Oct. 2006, 33(10): 3781-3795. |
Sechopoulos, et al., “Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets”, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 8, No. 4, Fall 2008, 161-171. |
Wen, Junhai et al., “A study on truncated cone-beam sampling strategies for 3D mammography”, 2004, IEEE, 3200-3204. |
Ijaz, Umer Zeeshan, et al., “Mammography phantom studies using 3D electrical impedance tomography with numerical forward solver”, Frontiers in the Convergence of Bioscience and Information Technologies 2007, 379-383. |
Kao, Tzu-Jen et al., “Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection”, Proc. of the 29th Annual Int'l. Conf. of the IEEE EMBS, Aug. 23-26, 2007, 4142-4145. |
Varjonen, Mari, “Three-Dimensional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Early Diagnosis and Detection of Breast Cancer”, IWDM 2006, LNCS 4046, 152-159. |
Taghibakhsh, f. et al., “High dynamic range 2-TFT amplified pixel sensor architecture for digital mammography tomosynthesis”, IET Circuits Devices Syst., 2007, 1(10, pp. 87-92. |
Chan, Heang-Ping et al., “Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: Preliminary Experience”, Radiology, Dec. 2005, 1075-1080. |
Diekmann, Felix et al., “Thick Slices from Tomosynthesis Data Sets: Phantom Study for the Evaluation of Different Algorithms”, Journal of Digital Imaging, Springer, vol. 22, No. 5, Oct. 23, 2007, pp. 519-526. |
Van Schie, Guido, et al., “Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis vols. with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms”, Med. Phys. 40(4), Apr. 2013, 41902-1-41902-11. |
Van Schie, Guido, et al., “Generating Synthetic Mammograms from Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, No. 12, Dec. 2013, 2322-2331. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200390404 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60774142 | Feb 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16434064 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 16936550 | US | |
Parent | 15904735 | Feb 2018 | US |
Child | 16434064 | US | |
Parent | 14021624 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 15904735 | US | |
Parent | 11707587 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 14021624 | US |