This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/SE013/050991, filed Aug. 23, 2013, which claims priority from Swedish Application 1250954-3, filed Aug. 24, 2012. The contents and disclosures of each of those applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entity. International Application No. PCT/SE2013/050991 was published under PCT Article 21(2) in English.
This invention is concerned with a system for the unsupervised sensing the presence/concentration of substances, such as ethyl alcohol, within the expired breath of a person.
Breath Alcohol Concentration (BrAC) is related to Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) by the approximate relation BrAC[mg/l]=0.5*BAC[mg/g]. Other substances will have different coefficients.
Supervised breath tests according to the state of the art are being performed by the police in order to prevent drunk driving. For the same purpose, unsupervised tests using alcolocks in vehicles are also being increasingly used. Sensor technologies include catalytic semiconductors, fuel cells and infrared spectroscopy. Performance with respect to accuracy, specificity, environmental immunity, and response time, is highly variable between different devices available on the market. Devices for breath test include sensor elements providing a signal representing BrAC after taking a deep breath, and emptying the airways via a tight-fitting mouthpiece, which for hygienic reasons has to be a separate, disposable item. In order to ensure a correct determination, the test person is required to deliver a forced expiration at almost full vital capacity. This requires a substantial effort, especially for persons with limited respiratory capacity. The handling of mouthpieces is costly, time-consuming and represents an undesired source of error due to water condensation.
The basic techniques of breath analysis were developed during the second half of the 20th century. More recently, a movement towards less obtrusive means for breath test has been noted. Olsson et al (WO 98/20346) disclosed a system solution in which accurate measurements could be performed without a mouthpiece using water vapor as a tracer gas. Lopez (U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,853) reported another approach, using ultrasound to correct for the dependence on distance between the device and the user's mouth. Hö k et al (GB 2431470) disclosed a system solution using carbon dioxide (CO2) as a tracer gas, combined with a simple algorithm for correction of a diluted breath sample. Still another approach was reported by Lambert et al (SAE World Congress Apr. 3-6, 2006). The air within a vehicle cabin was monitored, and an alcohol adsorbing material was used to accumulate the sample to enhance resolution. Again, CO2 was used as a tracer gas.
A specific object of the present invention is to reduce the effort required by the person to be tested to a minimum, without compromising reliability. Other objects are to reduce the total time required for a breath test, and that the system is self-instructive even for an inexperienced person.
The present invention is based on a few critical elements which in combination will provide the necessary characteristics. First, there is provided a sensor unit providing a signal corresponding to the instantaneous alcohol concentration of air flowing through a predefined inlet area. A predefined inlet area is one or several openings, allowing air to be continuously flowing from the inlet area to the sensor. Second, there is provided an apparatus responsive of the presence of a person at a position in the vicinity of the sensor inlet area, and also including a unit for calling for and directing the immediate attention of the person, and of providing instruction to direct expiratory air flow towards the inlet area. This directed breath is a deliberate act by the person. Third, an analyzer is included for the determination of breath alcohol concentration of said person based on the sensor signal.
The combined function of the basic elements is necessary and sufficient for breath tests of experienced users to be effortlessly performed within 2-3 seconds at full privacy, without a mouthpiece, and without interfering with normal activities, such as on-going conversation. The inexperienced user is guided by automatically communicated instructions to successful completion of the test.
The present invention allows breath tests to be performed in a variety of circumstances which have hitherto been inaccessible. The improved user friendliness combined with the possibility of vehicle integration may be an important step towards preventing drunk driving on a much larger scale than with products available at the present. This is believed necessary to reduce the high mortality of alcohol related traffic accidents. Other promising application areas are sobriety control of staff with critical tasks, and of audience arriving at an arena. It may also be used in various self test scenarios, e.g. in the treatment of alcoholics. The possibility of unobtrusive breath tests is expected to become important for diagnostic purposes in emergency medicine. For this purpose, a large number of volatile substances are of interest in addition to ethyl alcohol.
In view of the shortcomings of prior art systems, the inventors have devised a novel system.
Thus, claim 1 defines a breath test system, including a sensor unit (5) configured to sense the presence or concentration of a volatile substance, present in air flowing through a predefined inlet area (4), and to generate a signal corresponding to the concentration of said substance; an apparatus (2, 3) configured to detect the presence of a person at a position in the vicinity of said input area, and having means for registering said presence, and further configured to respond to said presence by delivering an output, said apparatus including a unit configured to call for immediate attention of said person, upon said registration of the presence of said person; and a unit configured to provide instructions to said person to direct an expiratory air flow towards said inlet area (4); an analyzer (10) for the determination of breath substance concentration of said person, the determination being based on said signal corresponding to the substance concentration.
The main advantage of the system is that it is unobtrusive, i.e. it does not unduly interfere with the person subjected to the use of the system.
The invention will now be described below with reference to the drawings in which
The present invention involves both physical attributes and functional characteristics, as evident both in the enclosed claims and the detailed description.
As already explained in the background, a central characteristic of the present system is to obtain cooperation with the person 11 during a short moment of time. The apparatus configured for achieving this includes means for registration 2 of the presence of a person 12 at a position in the vicinity of the inlet area 4, and an audiovisual unit 3. The implementation of the means of registration 2 is highly depending on the actual application and could include a microswitch indicating door opening/closure, microphone, camera, contactless detector using ultrasound or infrared radiation, force sensor responding to the weight of the person. It may include means for identification of the person by voice control, image analysis, bar-code reading, or biometric analysis. The audiovisual unit 3 preferably includes a loudspeaker 3a and a display 3b. The loudspeaker 3a may generate artificial speech or symbolic sound tracks, and the display 3b may convey text, images, icons or other symbols.
Preferably, the audiovisual unit 3 is located in close vicinity to the inlet area 4 of the sensor unit 5, in order to direct the person's 12 attention to this area. It is capable of calling for the immediate attention of the person 12 upon presence registration or at some later instant. It is also capable of conveying an instruction, even a detailed one, in the case that the person 12 may need one.
The location of the audiovisual unit 3 in close vicinity to the inlet area 4 is particularly important in the case of an experienced but distracted or otherwise un-attentive person 12. When reminded by the signals from the audiovisual unit 3, the experienced person 12 will react with minimal time delay, and deliver a directed breath towards the inlet area 3. Alternative solutions would increase the mental load of the person 12.
From research in experimental psychology it is known that the reaction time of a person may vary from 0.2 to several seconds depending on the degree of distraction, mental load, and choice options. The capability of the present invention to both call for and direct the attention of the experienced person 12 to the sensor inlet area is thus highly important in order to save time.
As a consequence of mixing between ambient and expiratory air, the signal generated by the sensor element 8 will be diminished by a factor corresponding to the dilution of the expiratory air. Therefore, another sensor element 7 is included in addition to the element 8, for measuring the concentration of a tracer gas, e.g. carbon dioxide (CO2) or water vapor. Since the tracer gas concentration is approximately constant when leaving the airways on expiration, it is possible to obtain a fair approximation of the degree of dilution of the air entering the sensor unit 5. Another option for a tracer signal besides CO2 and H2O is temperature. The temperature of expiratory air is almost the same as body temperature as it leaves the mouth or nose but is cooled will get closer to ambient upon mixing.
The sensor elements 7 and 8 constitute the receiver ends of a measurement cell for infrared (IR) transmission measurement. From an infrared emitter 6, preferably a blackbody radiating element, a beam of broadband infrared radiation is illuminating the cell, and eventually after multiple reflections it will reach the elements 7, and 8. Preferably, the emitter 6 is modulated at a frequency, e.g. 5 Hz, above the frequency band of typical signals. Each of the sensor elements 7 and 8 include thermopile detectors of infrared radiation with bandpass interference filters tuned to the absorption peak of the substance to be detected. The element 8 includes a filter with the pass band within the interval 9.1 . . . 9.9 μm for ethyl alcohol, and the element 7 the filter in the interval 4.2 . . . 4.3 μm in the case of CO2 as tracer gas. Water vapor, an alternative tracer gas, has strong absorption in the wavelength intervals 2.5 . . . 2.8 μm and 5.7 . . . 6.9 μm. Other combinations of gases and filter characteristics are possible. Acetone, acetaldehyde, methyl alcohol, carbon monoxide, methane, ethane, propane, pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, isoprene, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, ethyl acetate, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether, benzene, toluene, methyl ethyl ketone, and methyl isobutyl ketone are examples of volatile substances that may be of interest from a diagnostic or toxicological perspective.
The optical path from the IR emitter 6 to the detectors 7, and 8 may depend on the concentration range and the absorption coefficients of the actual substances. CO2 has strong absorption and high concentration in expiratory air which calls for a short optical path, 10-25 mm. For alcohol detection below the legal concentration limits, path lengths of more than 0.5 m may be necessary. By folding the optical path using multiple reflections, the length/width/height of the sensor unit 5 can still be kept smaller than 70/30/15 mm.
The sensor unit 5 responds almost instantaneously, i.e. within a fraction of a second, to concentration variations occurring at the inlet area 4. This is partly due to the small distance between the inlet area 4 and the sensor unit 5, typically 10-20 mm, its small inner volume, typically 20-60 ml, and the air volume flow, typically 100-200 ml/sec, generated by the fan 9. It is also due to the relatively fast modulation frequency of the infrared emitter. The signal information extracted from the sensor elements 7 and 8 is represented as the amplitude of the modulation frequency.
The signals from the sensor elements 7, 8 are brought to an analyzer 10, which preferably includes a general purpose digital microcontroller with capacity to execute signal algorithms, and also controlling the audiovisual unit 3, IR emitter 6, fan or pump 9. Signal conversion between different formats, including analog signals, can be managed by the microcontroller 10, which will also be capable of communicating with external units, e.g. an actuator unit for taking action or counteraction depending on the result of the breath test. Electric power for the system 1 can either be obtained from a battery or from an external power source. The system 1 can be designed as a stand-alone unit, or as an integrated part of other inventories, e.g. a vehicle compartment or entrance of building or workplace. Preferably, the inlet area 4 includes means for protection of the sensor unit 5, e.g. a lid which is closed when the system 1 is inactive.
In order to meet requirements on electromagnetic emission and immunity, the system according to the invention includes capacitive and inductive electronic elements for protective purposes. In addition, the elements 7 and 8 and their associated analog input stages are preferably equipped with differential preamplifiers in order to suppress the influence of common mode interference.
The system according to the invention is preferably confined in a box to be wall-mounted in such a way that the means for registration 2, audiovisual unit 3, and inlet area 4, are located on one side of the box and thereby accessible through a hole in the wall.
When the system is ready for test it will remain in a standby condition until the presence of a person within the predefined position is detected. As previously described, detection may or may not involve identification of the person, and could require two-way communication between the person and the system. After or during the presence detection step, the system will call for the person's attention by coordinated flashing light, distinctive and directional sound combined with specific symbol or icon representing the breath test.
An experienced person is then expected to direct expiratory air towards the sensor inlet area, whereas an inexperienced person may require a more or less detailed instruction on how to proceed. Example of instruction provided verbally or as a text message: “Take a deep breath, lean over, open your mouth wide and exhale gently.” Alternatively, instructions are provided by text, still or moving images, graphic symbols or other means. If the criteria for breath detection are not fulfilled after one round of instruction, repeated instructions may be delivered at increasing level of detail.
The criteria for breath detection preferably involve tracer gas detection as previously described. In the case of CO2 as tracer gas, a simple criterion is reaching a threshold CO2 concentration of e.g. 2500 ppm (parts per million), which corresponds to a dilution factor of 20 (alveolar CO2 concentration being approximately 5 vol %, or 50 000 ppm). Additional criteria could be related to the time derivative of the CO2 signal. The simultaneously measured alcohol concentration will in this case have to be multiplied with 20 in order to obtain an estimated breath alcohol concentration. The criteria for breath detection should also include correction for background CO2 concentration, which is typically 400-600 ppm in normal environments. A mathematical expression or algorithm will normally be adequate for defining the criteria, using settable parameters to adapt for variations between different conditions. Such an algorithm can be implemented for execution in real time using standard microcontrollers.
The level of dilution is a measure of the signal quality. High concentration (small dilution factor) provides high confidence of the determination, whereas the influence of interfering factors, such as other nearby persons, will increase with degree of dilution. Preferably, the result of the breath test is presented not only as a concentration but also in terms of an estimated error depending on the dilution factor.
Breath detection may in some applications override the presence detection as symbolized in
Determination of BrAC is performed by another algorithm based on the correlation between the signals from the sensor elements 7 and 8. When the sensor unit 5 is receiving expired air from a person, both sensor elements exhibit concentration peaks which occur almost simultaneously. An average BrAC value is obtained by multiplying a number of measured alcohol concentrations by their respective dilution factors. By averaging, the effect of noise and interference is reduced. A small time difference between the CO2 and the alcohol signals due to differences caused by the anatomic dead space or by the design of the sensor unit 5 is also possible to accommodate in the algorithm.
The completion and result of a breath test defined by fulfillment of the criteria for breath detection, is preferably communicated to the person, e.g. using the audiovisual unit 3.
In the flow diagram of
In the time sequence of
The time sequence of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1250954-3 | Aug 2012 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2013/050991 | 8/23/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/031072 | 2/27/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3283563 | Turner et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3301482 | Bullen | Jan 1967 | A |
3780311 | Brown | Dec 1973 | A |
3792272 | Harte | Feb 1974 | A |
3792351 | Ireland | Feb 1974 | A |
3830630 | Kiefer et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3897659 | Henry | Aug 1975 | A |
4090078 | Heim | May 1978 | A |
4294327 | Howard | Oct 1981 | A |
4535620 | Cunningham | Aug 1985 | A |
4678057 | Elfman | Jul 1987 | A |
4749553 | Lopez et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4843377 | Fuller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4868545 | Jones | Sep 1989 | A |
4916435 | Fuller | Apr 1990 | A |
4975581 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5006315 | Maroulis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5303575 | Brown et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5426415 | Prachar et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458853 | Porter et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485850 | Dietz | Jan 1996 | A |
5544276 | Loux et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5652398 | Johnson | Jul 1997 | A |
5655530 | Messerschmidt | Aug 1997 | A |
5693944 | Rich | Dec 1997 | A |
5731581 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746973 | Naraghi | May 1998 | A |
5823951 | Messerschmidt | Oct 1998 | A |
5830112 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5877345 | Bauer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906203 | Klockseth et al. | May 1999 | A |
5955886 | Cohen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971937 | Ekstrom | Oct 1999 | A |
6123674 | Rich | Sep 2000 | A |
6129680 | Mottram | Oct 2000 | A |
6142951 | Park | Nov 2000 | A |
6152876 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157041 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6229908 | Edmonds et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266353 | Freitas et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6441388 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468222 | Mault et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488635 | Mottram | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6528809 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6608399 | McConnell et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622032 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6684099 | Ridder et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6726636 | Der Ghazarian et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6748301 | Ryu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6794988 | Weiss et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6862091 | Johnson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6983176 | Gardner et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016713 | Gardner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7092832 | Brown | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098037 | Haas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7173524 | Ponziani | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202091 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7386152 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7446878 | Ridder et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7671752 | Sofer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7736903 | Lambert et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764982 | Dalke et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7848605 | Ridder et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855027 | Bayer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7993281 | Stock et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8183527 | Taguchi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8306595 | Osaki et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8469134 | Osaki et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8605959 | Kangas | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8773390 | Clark | Jul 2014 | B1 |
9068885 | Kluczynski et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9073431 | Takahashi | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9163718 | Nelson | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9758039 | Hannon | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9823237 | Martin et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10151744 | Hok et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20020084130 | Der Ghazarian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020140289 | McConnell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030039299 | Horovitz | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048000 | Harter | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030085284 | Bremer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040093957 | Buess et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040260194 | Bayer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050241871 | Stewart | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060058697 | Mochizuki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060153740 | Sultan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154377 | Lambert et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167349 | Gardner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206034 | Stock et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210120 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253711 | Kallmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070077176 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142720 | Ridder et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144812 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070245801 | Stock | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006077 | Crabtree et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045806 | Keppler | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080061238 | Hok | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080107309 | Carni | May 2008 | A1 |
20080171947 | Ruffert | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228098 | Popov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252412 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319286 | Ridder et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007634 | Mitchell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039267 | Arndt et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087920 | Pettersson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090248260 | Flanagan | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293589 | Freund et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010325 | Ridder et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028210 | Ozaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100031718 | Heil | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036592 | Osaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100188232 | Lambert | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100268425 | Pettersson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100327167 | Koop et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110178420 | Ridder et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110283770 | Hok | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302992 | Robbins et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308297 | Tsuzuki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309932 | Arringdale et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120112879 | Ekchian et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130110311 | Ver Steeg | May 2013 | A1 |
20140002237 | Infante et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140156149 | Feit | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140260537 | Nash | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140318293 | Nelson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150066238 | Todd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150219620 | Hok et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150233897 | Hok | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160356764 | Martin et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170050518 | Steeg et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170074857 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170274768 | Hök et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1586944 | Mar 2005 | CN |
101292158 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101334399 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101631497 | Jan 2010 | CN |
102316801 | Jan 2012 | CN |
101354394 | Oct 2012 | CN |
4127599 | Feb 1993 | DE |
198 11 872 | Aug 1999 | DE |
199 38 064 | Aug 2000 | DE |
101 57 907 | Jun 2003 | DE |
102006018970 | May 2007 | DE |
102011106410 | Aug 2012 | DE |
0752584 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0 791 899 | Aug 1997 | EP |
1441212 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1688741 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2431470 | Apr 2007 | GB |
2442980 | Apr 2008 | GB |
11-104112 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2004-245799 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-157599 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-98058 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-147592 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-253455 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-291710 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008-302915 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2008-308037 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-257768 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-139319 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011-153956 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2012-198648 | Oct 2012 | JP |
536782 | Aug 2014 | SE |
536784 | Aug 2014 | SE |
WO 9222813 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO 9526889 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO97000443 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9820346 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0108554 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001008554 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-2004090786 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2007046745 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008108714 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2009048809 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2010085716 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093317 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO12064252 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2013081519 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2014031071 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014031072 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2016195803 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO 2017164953 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Giebel, Brian M., Thesis and Dissertation, “Advancement and Application of Gas Chromatography Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Atmospheric Trace Gas Analysis,” Published 2011, 252 total pages. |
Talbert, Bruce, et al., “A Study of Regulators for Delivering Gases Containing Low Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide,” LCGC North America, 22(6):562, 564, 567-568 (2004). |
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 1692 dated Jul. 13, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 0956 dated Jul. 13, 2015. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050991. |
Dhokalia et al., Resting End-Tidal 002 Association With Age, Gender, and Personality, Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 60, 1998, pp. 33-37. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050990. |
Lambert et al., Passive Sensing of Driver Intoxication, SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1321, 2006, SAE International. |
Blinco, L. J. et al., The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010 (Revised), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, May 2015 (Revised), DOT HS 812 013. |
Traffic Safety Facts, 2013 Data: Alcohol-Impaired Driving, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Dec. 2014, DOT HS 812 102. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150219620 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |