The present invention relates to devices and systems for filtering ambient air as it is inhaled, and more particularly to filtration devices and systems that employ filtering media and filtering components insertable into the nasal cavities.
There is an increasing need for effective filtration of breathing air, to reduce inhaled quantities of particulates and contaminants such as dust and pollen. In cities and other densely populated regions, there is a greater need for filtering pollutants generated by industrial and vehicle emissions. Certain specialized environments entail a greater risk of contamination in ambient air, e.g. construction sites and mines with respect to particulate matter, and hospitals with respect to viral and bacterial agents.
These concerns have led to development of a wide variety of masks, typically designed to cover the nose and mouth of the user. These masks frequently are ineffective due to perimeter leakage between the mask and face. Individuals who might benefit from the masks frequently refuse to wear them, due to discomfort or dissatisfaction with the appearance of the mask. Moreover, the masks tend to trap exhaled carbon dioxide, especially when the mask includes a fine (microporous) filter and forms a tight seal against the face. The longer the mask is worn, the greater is the tendency for buildup of carbon dioxide. The user, inhaling increasing amounts of carbon dioxide, is subject to headaches, drowsiness, and nausea, with prolonged exposure causing more severe effects.
To address these concerns, a variety of filtering devices have been proposed for insertion into nasal cavities. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 216,694 (Chen) shows a filter with a pair of plug units joined by a belt section, each plug unit receiving a filter. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 2,433,565 (Korman) describes a filter in which nostril inserts are joined by a bridge piece. Each insert contains a filter and a porous cone that can be used to deliver medication. In these devices, cylindrical or conical support structures surround the filtering media and press against the inside surface of the nasal wall and septum, frictionally retaining the filter. This support may be supplemented by an adhesive. In either event the supporting structure, which is impermeable to air flow, presses against the nasal wall and tends to mat the turbinates and nose hairs, thus diminishing the capacity of the nostril to trap particles, and warm and moisten incoming air. The filtering devices may satisfactorily perform the particle trapping function, but are not well adapted to warm and moisten the incoming air.
In an alternative approach, U.S. Pat. No. 5,392,773 (Bertrand) discloses a filter mounted outside the nasal cavities, secured to the nasal wall with an adhesive. The appearance of the filter, and the need for an adhesive, are disadvantages to this approach.
Further, regardless of whether the foregoing nasal filters are mounted outside the nose or inserted into the nasal cavities, they afford a relatively small surface area for filtration, limited by the size of the openings into the nostrils. Thus, they tend to plug quickly and require frequent replacement, especially on construction sites and in other environments with high particulate concentrations. Finally, the nasal filters afford no protection against intentional or inadvertent inhaling through the mouth.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a breathing air filtration device with filtering media insertable into the nasal cavities, yet with substantially larger surface areas for filtration.
Another object is to provide a filtration device with a support structure that maintains a filtering medium inside a nasal cavity and in spaced-apart relation to the nasal wall, to provide effective filtration while reducing interference with the particle trapping, air warming and air moistening functions of the nasal interior wall.
A further object is to provide a filtration system that effectively filters air entering the nose and mouth, and at the same time considerably reduces the volume available for trapping exhaled carbon dioxide as compared to masks that cover the nose and mouth.
Yet another object is to provide a nasal filter that is convenient to use, affords longer lasting and more effective filtration, and has a minimal impact on the user's appearance.
To achieve these and other objects, there is provided a breathing air filtration device. The device includes a concave-convex first filtering medium having a first rim at an open proximal end thereof defining a first opening surrounded by the first rim. A concave-convex second filtering medium has a second rim at an open proximal end thereof defining a second opening surrounded by the second rim. The filtration device has a support structure including a first base member coupled integrally with respect to the first rim to support the first filtering medium, and a second base member coupled integrally to the second rim to support the second filtering medium. A connecting member is coupled integrally to the first base member and the second base member and extends between the base members. The support structure base members are positionable at the nasal cavity entrance, with the connecting member spanning the septum. This places each of the first and second filtering media in a working position in which the filtering medium projects distally into an associated one of the nasal cavities. Thus, air entering each nasal cavity passes through the associated one of the first and second openings, and further passes through the associated one of the first and second filtering media.
Preferably, each filtering medium in its working position is spaced apart from the septum and from the nasal wall defining the associated nasal cavity. This result may be achieved by using a filtering medium that is substantially self-supporting, or by disposing an open frame between a more pliable filtering medium and the nasal wall. In either event, this arrangement provides increased comfort, and facilitates the flow of incoming air along the inside surface of the nasal wall, to effectively warm and moisturize the air when the filtering device is in place.
The filtering media can have ellipsoidal shapes, to more readily conform to the nostrils and nasal cavities. Alternatively, each filtering medium can have a truncated-conical shape, preferably modified to exhibit elliptical profiles in transverse planes.
Whether conical or ellipsoidal, the filtering media afford a considerably increased area available for filtration as compared to a filtering medium with a planar surface at the nasal cavity entrance. The magnitude of this advantage can be appreciated when considering the surface area of a hemisphere, as compared to a disk of the same radius. The hemisphere surface area is twice as large. The ellipsoidal and elliptical/conical filtering media can be configured to enhance the advantage, providing effective surface areas well over twice the area of the entrance to the nasal cavity.
The present invention may be embodied in a two-stage device, in which a first screening component is mounted with respect to the first base member and disposed proximally of the first filtering medium, and a second screening component is similarly mounted with respect to the second base member. The screening component can comprise a relatively coarse (larger porosity) activated charcoal filter intended to remove odors and larger particles. This prevents the larger particles from reaching the downstream filtering media, extending their useful life.
In certain environments, it is vital to insure against inhaling contaminants through the mouth as well as the nose. To this end, the device is augmented with a third base member positionable against the face in surrounding relation to the mouth to form an opening through which air can enter the mouth, and a third filtering medium mounted with respect to the third base member and dispose over the opening. If desired, the third filtering medium can be concaved-convex and project away from the mouth in the proximal direction. A flexible band or other retainer is used to releasably maintain the third base member against the user's face.
As compared to a mask filter covering the nose and mouth, the combination of separate nose and mouth filters is less cumbersome, less prone to leakage at the filtering device perimeter, and has a smaller enclosed volume near the face, and therefore is less prone to accumulation of exhaled carbon dioxide. If the user inhales substantially exclusively through the nose, problems due to carbon dioxide accumulation are avoided altogether.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a nasal air filtering device. The device includes a first filter and a second filter, both having respective first and second proximal ends and adapted for insertion into a nasal cavity. The device also includes a filter support structure including a first base member coupled with respect to the first proximal end and supporting the first filter, a second base member coupled with respect to the second proximal end and supporting the second filter, and a connecting member integrally coupled to the base members and extended between the base members. The base members of the filter support structure are positionable at the entrances to the nasal cavities, with the connecting member spanning the septum, thus to place each filter in a working position in which the filter projects distally into an associated one of the nasal cavities, and is spaced apart from the nasal wall that defines the associated cavity, thus to define a passage for accommodating air flow between the filter and the nasal wall.
If desired, each filter can be concave in the proximal direction and convex in the distal direction. The filter may be self-supporting and thus stand spaced apart from the nasal wall by virtue of its coupling to the associated base member. Alternatively, an open frame can be coupled to the base member and disposed between the filter and the nasal wall, to maintain the desired spacing.
Thus in accordance with the present invention, a filtration device insertable into the nasal cavities is easy to use, has a minimal impact on the appearance of the user, and provides more effective and longer-lasting filtration. Improved performance arises in part from the retention of air warming and moisturizing capability when the filtering media are maintained in the spaced-apart relation to the nasal walls. Improved performance also arises from a considerably enlarged surface area available for filtration, due to the concave-convex shape of the filtering media, and further if desired by forming the media with corrugations. Finally, the nasal filter can be combined with an auxiliary filter covering the mouth, to provide a combined filtration system which, compared to a conventional mask, is less prone to perimeter leakage and accumulation of exhaled carbon dioxide.
For a further appreciation of the above and other features and advantages, reference is made to the following detailed description and to the drawings, in which:
Turning now to the drawings, there is shown in
Panel 18 includes a base 20, an opposite base 22, and a connecting member or bridge 24 coupled to the bases to maintain the bases spaced apart from one another a desired distance. Each of the bases is annular—more precisely, generally annular in sense that its profile is somewhat elliptical rather than circular. Bases 20 and 22 have respective closed or endless perimeter regions 20a and 22a, and shoulders 20b and 22b that surround openings through the base, to admit air when the device is in use. As seen in
A generally conical filtering medium or filter 30 is mounted on base 20, and a similar filter 32 is mounted on base 22. Each filter is mounted to its associated base along a generally annular proximal edge or rim and extends away from the base to a distal apex. In use, filters 30 and 32 extend distally into the nasal cavities. Each of the filters can be attached to its associated one of shoulders 20b and 22b with a suitable adhesive.
Filters 30 and 32 can be formed from a wide variety of materials, and further can be formed with a wide (several orders of magnitude) range of porosities, depending on the nature of the contaminants to be filtered. Materials and porosities can be selected in accordance with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) classifications, e.g. dusts, mists and fumes (DMF), or high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters. Suitable materials include natural fabrics such as cotton, and polymeric materials such as nylon, polyethylene and polypropylene. Hypo-allergenic materials such as PVC and polyurethane also may be employed. Each of the filters has a substantially uniform thickness, and in general has a truncated conical shape, although differing from a precise truncated cone in two respects. With reference to filter 30, the distal end near the apex forms a rounded dome, rather than a transverse plane. Second, profiles of filter 30 taken in transverse planes are elliptical rather than circular, to provide a filter shape that better conforms to the nasal cavity. Filter 32 is similarly shaped.
As seen in
As a result of this positioning, and the close fit between bases 20 and 22 and the nasal cavities, air entering nasal cavity 38 enters through opening 26 and passes through filter 30. Likewise, air enters nasal cavity 40 through opening 28, and proceeds through filter 32.
Bridge 24 sets the desired spacing between bases 20 and 22, and thus facilitates proper positioning of filters 30 and 32 in their respective nasal cavities. The bridge also prevents over insertion of the filters by virtue of its contact with the septum, and remains easily accessible to the user desiring to remove filtering device 16 after use. Further, as best seen in
Filtering device 16 affords several advantages in comparison to the aforementioned conventional nasal filters. One of these arises from the concave-convex shape of filters 30 and 32. Each of the filters has a concave inside surface in the proximal (out of the nasal cavity) direction, and a convex exterior surface in the distal (into the nasal cavity) direction. As compared to a conventional arrangement including disk-shaped filters with surface areas comparable to openings 26 and 28, or higher volume filters that nonetheless are exposed only along openings such as 26 and 28, filters 30 and 32 have a much larger surface area available for filtration.
The magnitude of this difference can be understood when considering a filter shaped as a disk, compared to a filter having the same radius but shaped as a hemispherical shell. The surface area of the disk is πr2. The surface area of the hemispherical shell is 2πr2. The concavity in this instance doubles the surface area available for filtration. In the case of filters 30 and 32, this advantage is magnified, because the distance from the rim of each filter to its apex is considerably larger than the radius of the rim.
Another advantageous feature is the fact that filters 30 and 32 are sufficiently structurally self-supporting to stand alone, and are not surrounded by an air-impermeable cylinder or barrel, as is the case with the conventional filtering arrangements. Inhaled air readily passes through the entire filter, not just at or near the apex.
In short, the concave-convex shape, in the absence of air-impermeable structure contacting and surrounding the filter, leads to a considerable increase in the surface area available for filtration. Even a slight degree of concavity can increase the available surface area by fifty percent. More preferably, the available surface area is at least doubled as compared to a planar filter at the nasal cavity entrance.
Another salient advantage resides in the spaced-apart relation of each filter to the nasal wall defining the nasal cavity. More particularly, filter 30, for example, is spaced apart from septum 36 and the nasal wall 42 that cooperates with the septum to surround the filter. Filter 32 likewise is spaced apart from septum 36 and a nasal wall 44. This spacing promotes the flow of inhaled air along the space between each filter and its surrounding nasal tissue. Perhaps more importantly, this spacing has a favorable impact on the capacity of the nasal wall to warm and moisten inhaled air. Nasal hairs and turbinates are exposed, rather than matted down by the filter, or by an air-impermeable cylinder surrounding a filter. Thus, filtering device 16, as compared to prior filters, more effectively preserves the air warming and air moisturizing capability of the nasal cavity.
As perhaps best seen in
As seen from
If desired, bases 54 and 56 can be formed with respective perimeter regions 54a and 54b sized for insertion into the nasal cavity entrances, to support their associated filters and bases in the manner illustrated in
An open-frame retainer 94, shown above base 80, can be removably press-fit onto the base to capture an ellipsoidal, corrugated filtering medium 96. An open-frame retainer 98 can be similarly coupled to base 82, to contain an ellipsoidal, corrugated filtering medium 100. Each of the retainers includes a generally annular bottom portion 102 sized and shaped for a press-fit coupling with the shoulder of its associated base. Each retainer further incorporates several frame members 104, shorter than frame members 64–70 and extending to an open top 106 of the retainer, rather than to an apex or junction of the frame members as with device 46. Frame members 104, like the frame members in device 46, contact the nasal wall to provide frictional mounting of the device, and maintain their associated filters in spaced-apart relation to the nasal wall to promote air flow between each retainer and the nasal wall that surrounds it.
Filters 134 and 136 are press-fit into containers 126 and 128, which in turn are inserted through respective openings 138 and 140 in panel 110 until the bottom rim portion 130 of each container is contiguous with one of base portions 112 and 114. The result is shown in
As seen in
Device 151 provides two filtration stages, as inhaled air passes through one of filtering media 168 and 170, then through one of filtering media 164 and 166. In one preferred version, media 168 and 170 are relatively coarse activated charcoal filters, and filtering media 164 and 166 are finer (micropore) filters formed of polymeric fibers. Filters 168 and 170 screen out larger particles, and remove odors from the incoming air. This prevents the larger diameter particles from impacting and collecting over the ellipsoidal filters, lengthening their useful life.
Thus in accordance with the present invention, a breathing air filtration device is insertable into the nasal cavities for improved, longer lasting filtration of inhaled air. The enhanced surface area available for filtration lengthens the useful operation of the device. The area for filtration is enhanced by the concave-convex design of the filtering media, and can be further improved by corrugating the media. Filtering is improved by a selective positioning of the filters in spaced-apart relation to the surrounding nasal walls, resulting in more effective warming and moisturizing of the filtered air. The nasal filtering device also is effective in combination with an auxiliary filter covering the mouth, to provide a system suitable for use in lieu of a conventional mask, with improved resistance to perimeter leakage and accumulation of exhaled carbon dioxide.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
533880 | Forne | Feb 1895 | A |
701538 | Carence | Jun 1902 | A |
813425 | Hill | Feb 1906 | A |
1071015 | Adler | Aug 1913 | A |
1175799 | Niessner | Mar 1916 | A |
1322375 | Un | Nov 1919 | A |
1520930 | Calhoun | Dec 1924 | A |
1823094 | Dylong | Sep 1931 | A |
2057397 | Strauch | Oct 1936 | A |
2097846 | Strauch | Nov 1937 | A |
2151227 | Pawelek | Mar 1939 | A |
2162583 | Kjellsson | Jun 1939 | A |
2277390 | Crespo | Mar 1942 | A |
2433565 | Korman | Dec 1947 | A |
2535155 | Pandorf | Dec 1950 | A |
2672138 | Carlock | Mar 1954 | A |
2751906 | Irvine | Jun 1956 | A |
2777442 | Zelano | Jan 1957 | A |
2890695 | Safstrom | Jun 1959 | A |
3451392 | Cook et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3457917 | Mercurio | Jul 1969 | A |
3463149 | Albu | Aug 1969 | A |
3722509 | Nebel | Mar 1973 | A |
3747597 | Olivera | Jul 1973 | A |
3884223 | Keindl | May 1975 | A |
3905335 | Kapp | Sep 1975 | A |
4030491 | Mattila | Jun 1977 | A |
4052983 | Bovender | Oct 1977 | A |
4220150 | King | Sep 1980 | A |
4221217 | Amezcua | Sep 1980 | A |
4267831 | Aguilar | May 1981 | A |
4401117 | Gershuny | Aug 1983 | A |
4573461 | Lake | Mar 1986 | A |
4984302 | Lincoln | Jan 1991 | A |
5117820 | Robitaille | Jun 1992 | A |
5392773 | Bertrand | Feb 1995 | A |
5417205 | Wang | May 1995 | A |
5568808 | Rimkus | Oct 1996 | A |
5746200 | Draenert | May 1998 | A |
5775335 | Seal | Jul 1998 | A |
5787884 | Tovey | Aug 1998 | A |
5890491 | Rimkus | Apr 1999 | A |
6015425 | Altadonna, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6109262 | Tovey | Aug 2000 | A |
6119690 | Pantaleo | Sep 2000 | A |
6213121 | Cardarelli | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D451193 | McCormick | Nov 2001 | S |
6386197 | Miller | May 2002 | B1 |
6494205 | Brown | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6701924 | Land, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6962156 | Michaels | Nov 2005 | B1 |
20030106555 | Tovey | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106556 | Alperovich et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030209145 | Soper | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040055603 | Bruce | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079814 | Altadonna, Jr. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040194784 | Bertrand | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211425 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261798 | Rimkus | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050061325 | Michaels | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066972 | Michaels | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066973 | Michaels | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050205095 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |