1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to power converters, and more particularly to an overload protection system and method based on average current that enables a bridge converter to continue operation during overload conditions.
2. Description of the Related Art
A DC-DC power supply, otherwise known as a bridge converter, is usually provided with a means of overload protection when the output is overloaded. An overload condition occurs when the output current exceeds a predetermined limit. Bridge converters, including half-bridge and full bridge converters, typically include a peak current monitoring function that enables a protection function when the peak current exceeds a predetermined value. When such converters are operated by a control method known as voltage mode control and when they use pulse-by-pulse peak current limit, their behavior becomes unstable when operated in an overload condition for more than a few switching cycles. The activation of the overload circuitry based on pulse-by-pulse peak current defeats the function of DC blocking capacitors, thereby causing the bridge to become unbalanced.
The DC blocking capacitors are provided to balance the volt-seconds applied to the isolation transformer to prevent core saturation. The peak current control function terminates the half cycle based on peak current, which causes the DC blocking capacitors to develop a charge that is not based on volt-second imbalance thereby resulting in a mismatch of volt-seconds on the transformer core. The duty cycle applied to the transformer core becomes asymmetric between the two half cycles of a switching period, resulting in intrinsically unstable operation. The normal methodology is to disable or otherwise shutdown the converter in the event of an overload condition.
One particular subclass of converters is known as bus regulators or DC transformers in which the outputs are unregulated. A primary characteristic of these converters is that there is no closed loop feedback control for output regulation. These converters operate at nearly 100% duty cycle and act as an efficient means to step voltage up or down. The output inductors of such converters are very small relative to their counterparts in a regulated converter because of the high duty cycle and low voltage applied across them. The amplitude of ripple current is very low resulting in a small difference between the average current and the peak current. Using peak current limit forces the overload setpoint to be close to the maximum average output current. When an overload condition occurs, the peak current limit begins to terminate the duty cycle earlier in the switching cycle. As the current is further increased, the duty cycle terminates earlier and earlier. As the duty cycle is reduced, the output voltage, being proportional to the duty cycle, decreases, which causes the voltage applied across the output inductor to increase. The ripple current in the output inductor also increases proportionately. Since the peak current limit setpoint remains the same, the average current must decrease. The result is that the average output current is reduced below the normal steady state operating current. If the current level is reduced to the level prior to the overload condition, the converter will not recover. The current limit could be set much higher than the rated level, but this would require that the converter be over-designed for the application, which defeats the benefits of using such converters in the first place.
It is desired to allow a bridge converter to continue to operate during an overload condition without shutting it down or causing it to become unstable.
An overload protection circuit for a power converter according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a current sensor, a current comparator, and a control circuit. The current sensor circuit determines an average current signal based on a current level of the power converter. The average current signal may be based on average current, peak switching current, or other representation of output current. The current comparator compares the average current signal with a current reference signal and provides a current control signal indicative thereof. The control circuit controls switching of the power converter based on the current control signal during an overload condition.
In various configurations, the current may be sensed at the output of the power converter or at the transformer primary. The control circuit may include a PWM comparator that provides a PWM signal having a duty cycle indicative of the current control signal during the overload condition. The power converter may be implemented as an open loop configuration or with voltage mode control. A peak current detector may also be included for faster response.
A DC-DC power converter according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a bridge converter, a switching controller, a current sensing device, a current amplifier, and a PWM generator. The switching controller controls switching of the bridge converter based on a PWM signal. The current sensing device provides a current signal indicative of an average output current of the bridge converter. The current amplifier amplifies the difference between the current signal and a current reference signal and outputs a time averaged overload signal indicative thereof. The PWM generator generates the PWM signal and modifies the duty cycle of the PWM signal when the overload signal indicates an overload condition. The bridge converter may be implemented as either a half-bridge or a full-bridge converter.
A method of operating a bridge converter controlled by a PWM signal according to an embodiment of the present invention includes comparing average output current of the bridge converter with a current reference and generating an overload signal indicative thereof, and modifying the duty cycle of the PWM signal based on the overload signal. The method may include detecting a primary current of the bridge converter, converting the primary current to a current signal indicative of the average output current, and comparing the representative current signal with a current reference signal for controlling the PWM signal. The signal for controlling the PWM signal is the result of time averaging over one or more switching cycles a signal representative of the difference between the output current and the desired current limit reference. The method may further include generating a peak control signal indicative of the output exceeding a peak current level.
The benefits, features, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, and accompanying drawings where:
The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the present invention as provided within the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will, however, be apparent to one skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments. Therefore, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments shown and described herein, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features herein disclosed.
The inventor of the present application has recognized the need for protecting a pulse-width modulation (PWM) bridge power converter operated using pulse-by-pulse current limit during overload condition without shutting down the converter and without causing the converter to become unstable. He has therefore developed an average current overload protection circuit that allows the converter to continue operation during overload conditions without interfering with the function of DC blocking capacitors, as will be further described below with respect to
The CTL signal is provided to a negative or inverting input (−) of a PWM comparator 107, which receives a sawtooth signal ST at its positive or non-inverting input (+). The ST signal is generated by a sawtooth oscillator circuit 109. The comparator 107 compares the CTL signal with the ST signal and generates a corresponding pulse-width modulation signal PWM at its output as known to those skilled in the art. A switching controller 111 receives the PWM signal and generates multiple switching control signals SC provided to control the switching of the bridge converter 101.
A current sensor 113 senses the output current IOUT of the bridge converter 101 and generates an output current signal OC proportional to IOUT. The current sensing device 113 may be implemented using any suitable current sensing device as known to those skilled in the art, such as a current transducer, a current sensing transformer, etc. The OC signal is provided to an input of the current error amplifier 105, which outputs the ICTL signal having a voltage level proportional to the difference between the average output current of the bridge converter 101 and the voltage level of an output current reference signal IREF. The IREF signal has a voltage level selected to correspond with the maximum desired steady state output current of the bridge converter 101. In one embodiment, the current sensor 113 generates the OC signal proportional to the average of the IOUT signal. Alternatively, the current error amplifier 105 determines the average output current based on the OC signal for purposes of comparison with the IREF signal.
The multiple switching control signals SC include a first switching signal SC1 provided to the gate of the switch Q1 and a second switching signal SC2 provided to the gate of the switch Q2. The switching controller 111 activates the switch Q1 during one cycle of the PWM signal and activates the switch Q2 during the next cycle of the PWM signal and operation continuously alternates in this manner as known to those skilled in the art.
In this case, the multiple switching control signals SC include first and second switching signals SCA1 and SCA2 provided to the gates of the switches Q1 and Q4, respectively, and third and fourth switching signals SCB1 and SCB2 provided to the gates of the switches Q3 and Q2, respectively. The switching controller 111 activates the switches Q1 and Q4 during one cycle of the PWM signal and activates the switches Q2 and Q3 during the next cycle of the PWM signal and operation continuously alternates in this manner as known to those skilled in the art.
Under normal operating conditions when the power converter 100 is not experiencing an overload condition as shown at 301, the voltage error amplifier 103 dominates since the VCTL signal is lower than the ICTL signal. Thus, the VCTL signal determines the level of the CTL signal which controls the duty cycle of the PWM signal to control the output voltage of the VOUT signal. When an overload condition occurs as shown at 303, the current error amplifier 105 lowers the ICTL signal below the VCTL signal so that the ICTL signal controls the duty cycle of the PWM signal. In particular, the duty cycle of the PWM signal is reduced during the overload condition to maintain an essentially constant output current and symmetric duty cycle determined by the IREF signal.
The S&H circuit 602 samples the RP signal and generates an output sample signal SO, which is provided to a resistor/capacitor (R/C) amplitude and bandwidth compensation filter circuit 603. In particular, the SO signal is provided to one end of a resistor R2, having its other end coupled to one end of a resistor R3 and to one end of a capacitor CF for developing a voltage proportional to average output current signal VIA. The other ends of the resistor R3 and the capacitor CF are coupled to ground. The VIA signal is provided to one end of a resistor R4, having its other end coupled to the inverting input of an amplifier (e.g., an op amp, comparator, etc.) 605 and to one end of a feedback capacitor CFB. The other end of the capacitor CFB is coupled to the output of the amplifier 605, which develops the current control signal ICTL. The IREF signal is provided to the non-inverting input of the amplifier 605. The resistor R4, the capacitor CFB and the amplifier 605 form a current amplifier 606, which compares the VIA and IREF signals for developing the ICTL signal in a similar manner as previously described.
The ICTL signal is provided to the non-inverting input of another amplifier 607, which receives the sawtooth signal ST at its inverting input. The amplifier 607 serves as the PWM generator for developing the PWM signal, which is provided to the switching controller 111. The switching controller 111 develops the SC1 and SC2 signals, which are each provided to respective isolation/driver/level shifter (I/D/LS) circuits 609 and 611, which drive the switches Q1 and Q2, respectively, of the half-bridge converter 201. The SC1 and SC2 signals are also provided to respective inputs of a 2-input OR gate 613, which generates a sample/hold signal S/H provided to the S&H circuit 611. The RP signal is provided to the non-inverting input of another amplifier 615, which receives a peak reference voltage signal PREF at its inverting input. The output of the amplifier 615 asserts a peak current limit signal IPEAK, which is provided to the switching controller 111.
The current sense transformer T2, the rectifier full-wave rectifier 601 and the burden resistor R1 are used to translate and scale the primary current of the transformer T1 into the RP signal, which is a low voltage ground-referenced signal. The RP signal is used by both the S&H circuit 602 and the peak current limit detector amplifier 615. The peak current limit detector amplifier 615 operates similar to peak limit control circuits known to those skilled in the art and is not further described. The switching controller 111 controls the switching of the switches Q1 and Q2 via the SC1 and SC2 signals as previously described. The S&H circuit 602 captures the voltage representation of the primary current of the transformer T1 when either of the main switches Q1 or Q2 are on (via operation of the OR gate 613) and holds the captured voltage at its output SO. In other embodiments, the S&H circuit 602 may capture the signal at anytime during the on time, or may sample multiple times, to construct a representation of the current amplitude. The SO signal is scaled and bandwidth limited by the filter circuit 603, which outputs the VIA voltage signal representing the average output current. The current amplifier 606 amplifies the difference between the output current signal and the IREF reference voltage signal, which corresponds to the desired average current limit, and generates the ICTL signal used to control the duty cycle of the PWM signal during an overload condition.
During normal operation when the average current signal VIA is less than IREF, the ICTL signal asserted by the current amplifier 606 is at a maximum and the PWM signal is generated with maximum duty cycle. If the output current increases and causes an overload condition, the VIA signal is increased above the IREF signal and the ICTL signal is correspondingly reduced by the current amplifier 606. The reduction of the ICTL signal reduces the duty cycle of the PWM signal so that the output current does not exceed the target current level determined by the IREF signal.
It is appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, therefore, that average current overload protection circuits according to embodiments of the present invention correct the problem of unstable operation during overload conditions by using average current to control operation during overload conditions. Average current overload protection is used to allow the power converter to continue operating during overload conditions because the protection circuit does not interfere with the function of the DC blocking capacitors (e.g., C1 and/or C2). Average current limit does not result in volt-second imbalance of the transformer core, the converter maintains essentially constant output current during the overload condition, and the converter recovers to normal operation when the overload condition is removed. The present invention helps voltage mode controlled bridge converters by limiting output current to a desired level without causing a volt-second imbalance in the transformer and by allowing continued operation.
The present invention is particularly advantageous for converters in which the outputs are unregulated, such as bus regulators or DC transformers. As previously described, such converters have no closed loop feedback control for output regulation, operate at nearly 100% duty cycle, have relatively small output inductors, and operate with very low amplitude ripple current. The ripple current amplitude has a “D” factor (1-D, where “D”=duty cycle) in its calculation such that the ripple current amplitude is low at very low or very high duty cycle and is a maximum at 50% duty cycle. For example, the ripple current increases by a factor of about 5 when going from 95% to 50% duty cycle. Using average current limit according to embodiments of the present invention, however, allows the available output current to remain essentially constant regardless of duty cycle and output voltage level. Thus, if the overload condition is decreased or removed, the power converter recovers. Although average current limit has a relatively low bandwidth and does not react as quickly as peak current limit, the two methods may be combined to achieve an optimal solution. Such is shown by the unregulated power converter 600 using both average and peak control methods.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions and variations are possible and contemplated. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they can readily use the disclosed conception and specific embodiments as a basis for designing or modifying other structures for providing out the same purposes of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.