The invention relates to a bridge-like support structure made of fireproof ceramic bricks.
In the construction of industrial furnaces, for example of a lime shaft kiln, arches and domes of different widths are made in order to create a furnace space, whereat the arches or the domes are covered (superstructed) for example with fireproof bricks.
In the DE 101 21 699 C5 a load bearing (support) arch structure for a lime shaft kiln is described. The supporting arch consists of two bearing bricks at its ends, which rest on corresponding supports, and a multitude of bricks that are arranged in-between, each of which features a wedge shape in order to create the arch structure and which rest on each other via corresponding steps on their outer surfaces.
Another embodiment for such a support construction is shown in the DE 39 33 744 C2.
Particularly the last-mentioned embodiment has proved to be successful and is for example used in lime shaft kilns of the GGR type (co-current flow, counterflow, regenerative).
Thermal strain (expansion) in the bricks of the support construction inevitably takes place during the preheating and cooling down of the furnace. In arch constructions of the named type, the problem is that such strain, especially in a horizontal direction, can hardly or not at all be compensated for. In a worst case scenario, individual bricks are pushed radially to the outside (upwards), the brick network is weakened and individual bricks can even break or fall out, so that the arch construction collapses.
Even if the last-mentioned case is only an exception, there is the desire to optimize the support construction in such a way that strain/expansions in the brick material, especially strain in the horizontal direction, can be compensated for better.
In order to solve this problem, the invention leaves the known arch constructions and suggests, in its most general embodiment, a bridgelike support construction made out of fireproof (refractory) ceramic bricks, which features the following arrangement in its mounted state, looked at from both its free outer ends towards the inside:
The description of the geometry of the bricks and the support construction is generally done in such a way that the mounted state is looked at, as displayed in
A first fundamental feature of the support construction according to the invention lies in the fact that each brick features at least one generally horizontal step. “Generally horizontal” means that the step is ideally horizontal in the mounted position, but can also run slightly slanted/inclined towards the horizontal, wherein the corresponding angle of inclination/declination should be <10°, <5°, <2° in any case. The steps particularly run continuously from one front side of each brick of the named embodiment of the support construction to a back side (rear surface).
Due to the fact that the keystone, which lies on the inside (centrally) of the support construction, rests on the steps of the bearing bricks which lie on the outside, a self-supporting support construction is created using bricks with a simple geometric shape.
The support construction is suited for widths (between bearings at its ends) of up to 3,000 mm, while a support construction, at which at least one intermediate brick is placed between the keystone and each bearing brick, wherein the intermediate bricks again feature at least one generally horizontal step on their inside and outside, shows advantages for widths above 500 mm and especially above 1.000 mm.
A support construction with two of these intermediate bricks is constructed as follows:
In the case of more than two intermediate bricks the support construction can be described to that effect that:
In these embodiments with at least two intermediate bricks the general principle of the support construction mentioned above also remains, because in this case the bricks which lie further on the inside of the support construction also rest on corresponding steps of the outer adjacent bricks in the area of the named steps, so that if a force is exerted on the support construction from above, it is passed downwards, or respectively into the bearing bricks.
The horizontal contact areas of the bricks create the possibility to compensate for the strain in the bricks in a horizontal direction by inducing a horizontal parallel shift of adjacent bricks along the horizontal steps. In this context it is important that the generally vertical or slanted area segments of the insides and outsides of adjacent bricks are at a certain distance to each other, thus having grooves (joints) between them, in order to compensate for the horizontal shift between individual bricks.
For that matter, a sealing material, for example a ceramic fibre gasket, an elastic glue or deformable mortar, can be arranged between the inner and outer surfaces of adjacent bricks as well as in the area of the steps between adjacent bricks.
The new construction has the advantage over the mentioned state of the art that a radial expansion of a support ring formed of multiple support constructions is avoided.
The arrangement of the bricks within the support construction can take place in such a way that all bricks form a common, generally horizontal upper side. This is important because brickwork is often laid on top of the support construction. This is particularly easy in case of a horizontal upper side of the support construction and possible without filling material or special formats/shapes of bricks.
Analogously the bricks within the support construction can also form a common, generally horizontal bottom side.
Here it is also valid that the term “generally horizontal” is not to be understood in a strictly geometrical way, but also allows for equivalent variations or embodiments. Insofar, the respective surface segments of the bricks can also be corrugated or feature another profile, or respectively be designed in a slightly curved way.
The geometry of the individual bricks can be chosen in such a way that at least one step of each brick lies on the same level as at least one step of another brick. It is also possible for all steps within a support construction to align with each other, thus to lie on a common level.
In case of multiple steps along the inner or outer side of a brick, they are for example arranged in a step like manner. If the steps lying/arranged further to the outside within the brick compound of the support construction run vertically offset downwardly, an optimized force deflection can be achieved in this embodiment and in case of a support construction with intermediate bricks. This results in an image, where the steps lying on the inside run at a higher level than the steps lying on the outside, in the side view of the support construction. This embodiment is also displayed and further described in the following figure description.
Within the support construction, the keystone can feature an approximated T-shape in its front view and its lower segment can conically narrow towards the bottom side of the support arch, even though an embodiment with a constant cross section is also possible.
The keystone features an anomaly compared to the intermediate brick insofar as that it only features two outer sides with at least one step each.
The keystone can also be vertically split in an embodiment according to the invention analogously to the subject of the DE 39 33 744; however this split would not have any technical use in terms of the invention and would only increase the number of components and prolong the mounting.
Both bearing bricks at the ends have the anomaly compared to the intermediate bricks, that only their inner side is in contact with a further brick of the respective support constructions, while the outside of each bearing brick is either exposed or rests against a support. Insofar another embodiment of the invention suggests designing the bearing bricks in the front view with an L-shape, or respectively a mirrored L-shape. In doing so the outer side of each bearing brick can generally run vertically and the inner side can be at an angle of >0 to the vertical outside of the step(s).
As shown in the principal presentation in
For this application, a single support construction can be designed in such a way that at least one brick features a geometry where the inside and the outside of the brick do not run parallel to each other, so that the brick features for example a trapezoidal shape in the top view. The slimmer face can be at the front or at the back.
The support construction can also be designed in such a way that at least one brick features a geometry wherein the inside and the outside of the brick are generally parallel, so that the brick features at least approximately a rectangular shape in the top view.
Any combination of bricks with different shapes (each in the top view) is possible within the support construction, for example: Bricks with a trapezoidal shape, which narrow towards the front; Bricks with a trapezoidal shape, which narrow towards the back; Bricks with a rectangular shape. In doing so, a loosening of bricks towards the front or the back can be avoided. The arrangement always takes place in such a way that the integral, self-supporting structure of the support construction is maintained.
It is advantageous if the grooves (in the top view) between adjacent bricks feature a generally constant width, but slightly wedged groove geometries are also possible.
Finally, the support construction can also be constructed in such a way that the bricks feature at least one curved face, so that the bricks are designed and arranged in such a way that at least one face of the support construction is curved. In an extreme case, a support ring of multiple support constructions is formed, wherein the inner cylindrical area of the ring is parallel to the cylindrical outer area of the ring. Geometries with planar brick faces at the front and/or back are also possible, which result in a polygonal progression of the front and/or back side of the whole support construction.
In the following, further possible embodiments of the support construction, or rather of the bricks forming the support construction, as well as advantages over the state or the art are described, which may be realised on their own or in combinations.
Further characteristics of the invention arise from the characteristics of the sub claims as well as the other application documents. The invention is further described in the following with the help of an embodiment. It is shown, each in a strongly schematic display:
The support construction according to
Grooves F, which are filled with a ceramic, high temperature resistant fibre material, can be seen between adjacent bricks.
The outer bearing bricks feature a horizontal step 10s, 12s on their inside, while the segments of the insides 10i, 12i of the bearing bricks 10, 12 following upwards and downwards run at an angle of approximately 10° to the vertical, in such a way that the bearing bricks 10, 12 are getting wider from the top to the bottom.
The intermediate bricks 14, 16 rests on the steps 10s, 12s with their corresponding steps 14as, 16as, or to be more accurate: the intermediate bricks 14, 16 rest on a fibre mat, which rests on the steps 10s, 12s.
The intermediate bricks 14, 16 also feature a step 14is, 14is on their inside. The steps 14is, 16is serve the support of corresponding steps 18s1, 18s2 in the area of the outer surfaces 18a1, 18a2 of the keystone 18.
Outside the steps the outer sides 14a, 16a as well as the inner sides 14i, 16i of the intermediate bricks 14, 16, further the outer sides 18a1, 18a2 of the keystone 18 are generally parallel to the inner surfaces 10i, 12i of the bearing bricks 10, 12
The described arrangement of the bricks 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 overall results in an integral (continuous, compact) bridgelike support construction, wherein the support construction is self-supporting, even though only the outer bearing bricks 10, 12 only partially rest on the corresponding supports (pillars P).
The upper side O and the bottom side U of the support construction are generally planar and horizontal in the displayed embodiment. This is analogously valid for the respective segments of the upper side O, or respectively the bottom side U of each individual brick 10, 12, 14, 16, 18.
Brickwork M is built on top of the upper side O.
Because the keystone 18 rests on the steps 14is, 16is of the intermediate bricks 14, 16 with its steps 18s1, 18s2 and the intermediate bricks 14, 16 rest on the steps 10s, 12s of the bearing bricks 10, 12 with their outer steps 14as, 16as, the vertical load of the brickwork M is spread through these horizontal support surfaces onto the outer (at the ends) supports (pillars P).
As shown in
In
The keystone according to
A bearing brick is displayed in
The front face (10vs) and back face 10hs of the bearing brick 19 are curved similarly to the keystone 18 according to
The step 10s could also be designed in a slightly profiled way, for example slightly curved. A corresponding curvature would cause the step between the front face and back face of the brick to feature a hill or mountain shape, while the geometry of adjacent bricks is respectively adjusted. In other words: The step would then feature for example a certain radius, but would also still be generally horizontal in direction of the adjacent brick in order to not influence the desired horizontal shift. Instead of a curvature, appropriate corresponding male/female/geometries can also be designed in the area of the steps of adjacent bricks, again without affecting the possibility of general horizontal shifts between adjacent bricks.
The intermediate brick according to
Regarding their slope, the inner and outer surfaces 14a, 14i correspond to the outer surfaces 18a1, 18a2 of the keystone (key piece) 18 according to
The invention comprises support constructions, which are designed mirror inverted to a mirror plane, which is perpendicular to the longitudinal extension of the support construction (between the end bricks).
The invention also comprises “asymmetrical” embodiments. Such an asymmetry can for example occur when:
Such asymmetrical arrangements of bricks can be achieved by any brick-combination and can, amongst other things, be useful for repairs.
Nothing is changed about the general design of the support arch by this.
Especially the meaning and functioning of the horizontal steps remain unchanged. The previous explanation is analogously referenced to.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11191724 | Dec 2011 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/071006 | 10/24/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/079265 | 6/6/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
855495 | Baldwin | Jun 1907 | A |
884498 | King | Apr 1908 | A |
1242669 | Erkens | Oct 1917 | A |
1281976 | Keim | Oct 1918 | A |
1420810 | Bean | Jun 1922 | A |
1440446 | Cotton | Jan 1923 | A |
1618780 | Reintjes | Feb 1927 | A |
1648363 | Reintjes | Nov 1927 | A |
1655566 | Reintjes | Jan 1928 | A |
2067414 | Reintjes | Jan 1937 | A |
2158943 | Mamula | May 1939 | A |
2319065 | Karmanocky | May 1943 | A |
2645115 | Abeles | Jul 1953 | A |
2742023 | Reintjes | Apr 1956 | A |
2753711 | Weber | Jul 1956 | A |
3220367 | Stein | Nov 1965 | A |
3396504 | De Oliveira | Aug 1968 | A |
3682457 | Hollingsworth | Aug 1972 | A |
3831914 | Zimmermann | Aug 1974 | A |
3953009 | Kan | Apr 1976 | A |
4628657 | Ermer et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
5069015 | Steinwender | Dec 1991 | A |
6017487 | Fish | Jan 2000 | A |
D479342 | Dawson | Sep 2003 | S |
6705243 | Kassau | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20020124509 | Smyer, III | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20070101913 | Black | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6600483 | Jan 1969 | DE |
3714752 | Nov 1988 | DE |
3933744 | Apr 1991 | DE |
10121699 | Nov 2002 | DE |
0163866 | Dec 1985 | EP |
466811 | May 1914 | FR |
579631 | Oct 1924 | FR |
2008224145 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009053515 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/EP2012/071006 mailed Jan. 18, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140366478 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |