The disclosed system relates to an antenna and, more particularly, to a broadband blade monopole antenna that is substantially flat and defines a kite-shaped outer perimeter.
Antennas are generally used to transform electrical power into a radiated wave, and vice-versa. There are numerous types of antennas that are currently available that may be selected based on the specific application. For example, a broadband antenna may be distinguished by its relatively wide bandwidth, thereby making the broadband antenna highly desirable for certain types of applications. In general, a broadband antenna provides at least about 100% impedance bandwidth, and operates over a frequency greater than about twenty-five percent of its center operating frequency.
Although broadband antennas have numerous advantages, it may be challenging to produce a low-cost broadband antenna that has specific performance characteristics required for a particular application. Some examples of antenna performance characteristics include, but are not limited to, impedance bandwidth, electrical size, voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) at a specific frequency, gain patterns, aerodynamic qualities, and packaging constraints. In particular, it may be especially challenging to produce a broadband antenna that has a relatively high impedance bandwidth that is electrically small in size, and that is also relatively inexpensive to manufacture. Thus, there exists a continuing need in the art for a cost-effective broadband antenna that is relatively simple and inexpensive to produce.
The disclosed antenna is a broadband blade monopole antenna that includes a relatively simple design, and is also inexpensive to manufacture. Indeed, the antenna may be manufactured using relatively low-cost manufacturing processes such as, but not limited to, metal stamping. Moreover, the antenna does not typically require machining or any other labor-intensive manufacturing processes. Finally, it should be appreciated that the overall kite-shaped outer profile as seen in the figures may enhance efficiency and the overall aerodynamic shape of the antenna.
In one aspect, a broadband blade monopole antenna is disclosed. The broadband blade monopole antenna includes a body portion that is substantially flat to define a two-dimensional plane that the body portion extends along. The body portion defines an outer perimeter having four sides. The four sides are grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides positioned directly adjacent to each other. The broadband blade monopole antenna provides at least about 100% impedance bandwidth.
In another aspect, a broadband blade monopole antenna is disclosed. The broadband blade monopole antenna includes a body portion that is a solid piece and has a height to width ratio of 9.2 to 8.4. The body portion is substantially flat to define a two-dimensional plane that the body portion extends along. The body portion defines a kite-shaped outer perimeter having four sides. The four sides are grouped into two pairs of equal-length sides positioned directly adjacent to each other. The broadband blade monopole antenna provides at least about 100% impedance bandwidth.
Other objects and advantages of the disclosed method and system will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
Referring back to
In the non-limiting embodiment as shown in
In the embodiment as shown, the antenna 10 defines an outer perimeter 30. The outer perimeter 30 of the antenna 10 defines four sides, which are side 32a, side 32b, side 34a, and side 34b. As seen in
As seen in
In one non-limiting embodiment, the corner 40a, which is located at a lowermost portion 50 of the antenna 10, may be electrically connected to a feed 52. The feed 52 may be connected to a ground plane 54. The ground plane 54 may be a conductive surface such as, for example, the skin of an aircraft. It is to be appreciated that the overall kite-shaped outer perimeter 30 of the antenna 10 defines an aerodynamic profile. The aerodynamic profile of the antenna 10 may result in reduced drag when compared to other profiles that are currently used for antennas, which is especially beneficial in aircraft applications. Furthermore, the antenna 10 may be omni-directional antenna with respect to azimuth. That is, the antenna 10 may include a generally uniform gain as the antenna rotates in azimuth. The antenna 10 may cover multiple contiguous frequency bands, and is relatively electrically small in size. For example, in the embodiment as shown in
Turning back to
It should be appreciated that the matching circuit 56 is optional, and may or may not be included with the antenna 10. However, the matching circuit 56 may widen the bandwidth of the antenna 10. It should also be appreciated that the position of the matching circuit 56 relative to the feed 52 may also be adjusted based on the specific dimensions and requirements of the antenna 10. Specifically, the matching circuit 56 may be positioned at a distance 58 from the feed 52. It is to be appreciated that the matching circuit 56 may be moved towards the feed 52 or away from the feed 52 depending on the requirements of the antenna 10. In the exemplary embodiment as shown in
The sides 32a, 32b located along the lower portion 36 of the antenna 10 define a bevel with respect to the ground plane 54. That is, the sides 32a, 32b located along the lower portion 36 of the antenna 10 are not oriented at a right angle that is perpendicular with respect to the ground plane 54. Instead, the sides 32a, 32b define a sloping edge with respect to the ground plane 54. The sides 34a, 34b located along the upper portion 38 of the antenna 10 may be slanted or angled as well.
As seen in
In the embodiment as shown in
Referring generally to the figures, the disclosed antenna 10 is a broadband blade monopole antenna that includes a relatively simple design, and is also inexpensive to manufacture. Indeed, the antenna 10 may be manufactured using relatively low-cost manufacturing processes such as, but not limited to, metal stamping. Moreover, the antenna 10 does not typically require machining or any other labor-intensive manufacturing processes. Finally, it should be appreciated that the overall kite-shaped outer profile as seen in the figures may enhance efficiency and the overall aerodynamic shape of the antenna 10.
While the forms of apparatus and methods herein described constitute preferred aspects of this disclosure, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to these precise forms of apparatus and methods, and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2568710 | Bolljahn | Sep 1951 | A |
20030076269 | Kuramoto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050110687 | Starkie | May 2005 | A1 |
20110148722 | Bellows | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
EP, Extended European Search Report and Opinion; European Patent Application No. 16187220.5, 11 pages (dated Feb. 3, 2017). |
Ammann, M.J. et al; “Small Planar Monopole Covers Multiband Brans”; 30th European Microwave Conference Proceedings; Conf. 30, XP-001060920, pp. 242-245 (Oct. 4, 2000). |
Manac'h, L. et al.; “Performance of a Lozenge Monopole Antenna Made of Pure Composite Laminate”; Progress in Electomagnetics Research Letters, vol. 35, XP055126259, pp. 115-123 (Jan. 1, 2012). |
Ammann, M.J.; “Control of the Impedance Bandwidth of Wideband Planar Monopole Antennas Using a Beveling Technique”; Microwave and Optical Technology Letters; vol. 30, No. 4; pp. 229-232 (Aug. 4, 2001). |
Sairam, Chandana et al.; “Broadband Blade Antenna for Airborne Applications”; Defence Electronic Research Laboratory; Hyderabad, India; pp. 1-4 (Dec. 16-18, 2011). |
Ahirwar, S.D. et al.; “Broadband Blade Monopole Antenna Covering 100-2000 MHz Frequency Band”; Defence Electronics Research Laboratory; Chandrayangutta lines, Hyderabad-05; pp. 1-4 (Dec. 14-16, 2009). |
Jusoh, M. et al.; “A Compact Dual Bevel Planar Monopole Antenna with Lumped Element for Ultra High Frequency/Very High Frequency Application”; Microwave and Optical Technology Letters; vol. 54, No. 1; pp. 156-160 (Jan. 1, 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170069971 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |