This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,225 filed on Feb. 24, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,379,448), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/856,541 filed on Sep. 16, 2015 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/051,778 filed on Sep. 17, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/441,659 filed on Apr. 6, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077) which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 61/537,488 and 61/473,076 filed on Sep. 21, 2011 and Apr. 7, 2011, respectively, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,264 filed on Feb. 24, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/628,076 filed on Feb. 20, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,705,201), International Application No. PCT/US14/72233 filed on Dec. 23, 2014, International Application No. PCT/US12/32638 filed on Apr. 6, 2012, and International Application No. PCT/US12/32648 filed on Apr. 6, 2012, which are incorporated herein by reference.
The following references are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
The present disclosure is directed in general to the field of artificial magnetic conductors (AMCs) and frequency-selective surfaces (FSSs). In particular, this invention is directed to the area of Active Artificial Magnetic Conductors (AAMCs).
While naturally occurring conductors reflect electromagnetic waves out of phase, AMCs are metamaterial structures that reflect incident electromagnetic waves in phase. These metamaterial structures are particularly useful as replacements for metallic surfaces in applications where antennas have to be placed near and/or parallel to metallic surfaces. AMCs typically comprise homogenous unit cells having dimensions that are less than a half wavelength of a desired transmitted radiation and achieve their properties by resonance.
AMC surfaces are generally designed to have an allotted set of frequencies over which electromagnetic surface waves and currents can propagate; hence, AMCs are often referred to as “frequency-selective surfaces”. These materials can be incorporated as antenna ground planes, small flat signal processing filters, or filters as part of waveguide structures. AMC surfaces can effectively attenuate undesirable surface wave propagation and produce improved radiation patterns. This is because the AMC can suppress surface wave propagation within a prescribed range of forbidden frequencies.
In general, an AMC surface can have a very high surface impedance within a specific frequency range, wherein the tangential magnetic field strength can be small compared to the strength of the electric field along the surface. A typical passive AMC comprises patches disposed over a ground plane, with conductive vias coupling the patches to the radio frequency (RF) ground. Passive AMCs are isotropic and can operate for any incident wave polarization.
AMC surfaces can have narrow bandwidths of operation. Attempts to increase AMC bandwidths have resulted in unstable circuits with unwanted oscillations or conditionally stable circuits with certain limitations. As an example, integrating negative inductors or non-Foster circuits (NFCs) into a passive AMC can result in instability in the E-plane of the AMC. This instability can however be reduced by, for example, changing the configuration of the couplings between conductive patches in an AMC and adjusting the impedance of the NFCs that couple the conductive patches of the AMC.
AMC technology is applicable to a number of antenna applications including 1) increasing antennae bandwidths, 2) reducing finite ground plane edge effects for antennas mounted on structures to improve the radiation patterns of the antennas, 3) reducing couplings between closely spaced (<1λ) antenna elements on certain structures to mitigate co-site interference, 4) enabling the radiation of energy polarized parallel to and directed along structural metal surfaces, and 5) increasing the bandwidth and efficiency of cavity-backed slot antennas while reducing cavity size. The AMC technology disclosed herein can be particularly applicable for frequencies less than 1 GHz, where the thickness of the traditional AMC becomes prohibitive for most practical applications.
One embodiment described in this disclosure comprises an AAMC comprising a rectangular array or lattice of unit cells, each unit cell comprising a NFC having a negative inductance and/or negative capacitance and coupled in a crossover configuration that can restrain or suppress the two-dimensional quadrupole mode of the AAMC.
The AAMC can operate independently of wave polarization; thus it can be referred to as a dual-polarization AAMC or a dual-pol AAMC. The AAMC can comprise a square array of patches or plates shunted to ground or a ground plane by conductive vias (also known as mushroom unit cells). NFCs can couple adjacent metal plates in a crossover configuration. This crossover configuration can restrain or suppress the quadrupole mode of the AAMC, reducing instability therein.
The AAMC can comprise: a plurality of impedance elements arranged in rows and columns on a dielectric substrate, with a distance or gap positioned between adjacent impedance elements, and one or more circuits coupling neighboring impedance elements in a crossover configuration. The circuits can be NFCs comprising negative inductors and/or negative capacitors. The negative inductors and negative capacitors of the NFCs can be coupled in parallel between neighboring impedance elements. The impedance elements can comprise conductive patches or metallic regions on a layer of a dielectric substrate of the AAMC.
The AAMC can comprise an array of impedance elements arranged along a surface; a plurality of NFCs coupling said impedance elements to each other so as to form a first network of impedance elements and NFCs and a second network of impedance elements and NFCs, wherein the first and second networks of impedance elements and NFCs are distinct, interleaved networks of impedance elements and NFCs.
An embodiment of the proposed system comprises a periodic array of unit cells that reflects electromagnetic waves polarized parallel to a surface with a zero-degree phase shift. The system comprises an array of unit cells having impedance elements connected to neighboring impedance elements with NFCs in a crossover configuration, each impedance element being coupled to a ground plane with a conductive via. The system provides operational stability to the AAMC in addition to supporting a broadband operation.
A method of fabricating an artificial magnetic conductor can comprise: forming a substrate on a grounded conductive layer, arranging an array of impedance elements on the substrate with a distance or gap between the regions, coupling the impedance elements with NFCs having negative inductance and/or negative capacitance in a crossover configuration, forming a first network of impedance elements and NFCs and a second network of impedance elements and NFCs, and constructing low impedance or conductive vias coupling the impedance elements to the ground plane, thereby coupling the first network of impedance elements and NFCs to the second network of impedance elements and NFCs.
Certain embodiments can provide various technical features depending on the implementation thereof. For example, a technical feature of some embodiments can include the capability to provide a large bandwidth of operation while suppressing or restraining unstable modes of the AAMC. Other embodiments can focus on tuning the bandwidth of operation while maintaining a stable AAMC design.
Although specific features have been enumerated above, various embodiments can include some, none, or all of the enumerated features. Additionally, other technical features will become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its features, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals represent like parts.
Although example embodiments are illustrated below, the present technology can be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not. The present technology should in no way be limited to the example implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated herein. The drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
An AMC is a type of metamaterial that emulates a magnetic conductor over a limited bandwidth. AMC ground planes enable conformal antennas to have currents flowing parallel to their surfaces because the image currents in the AMC ground planes are in phase with their current sources. AMCs can comprise laminated structures composed of periodic grids of metallic patches distributed on grounded dielectric layers. AMCs have limited bandwidth, which is proportional to the AMC's substrate thickness and permeability. At VHF-UHF, the substrate thickness necessary for a reasonable AMC bandwidth is excessively large for antenna, ground-plane applications. Highly permeable materials are undesirable at these frequencies because they are generally expensive, heavy, and present high-loss with respect to antenna efficiency.
The bandwidth limitation of an AMC can be overcome by using an AAMC. The AAMC can be loaded with NFCs having negative inductances that couple the neighboring impedance elements, which can increase the AMC bandwidth by 10 times or more. The NFC's negative inductance is loaded in parallel with the substrate inductance resulting in a much larger net inductance and hence, a much larger AMC bandwidth.
An E-plane of a single-polarization antenna can be defined as a plane containing the electric field vector and the direction of maximum radiation. For the AAMC of
Couplings between neighboring NFCs 103 in the E-plane of the AAMC (i.e. between NFCs 103 in neighboring rows in
The AAMC of
Each NFC can be represented by the equivalent circuit model shown in
An AMC can be characterized by: 1) its resonant frequency, ω0, which is the frequency at which an incident wave is reflected with a 0° phase shift; and by 2) its ±90° bandwidth, which is defined as the incident wave frequency range wherein the reflected wave phase is within the range |φr|<90. An AMC response can be accurately modeled over a limited frequency range using an equivalent parallel LRC circuit with LAMC, CAMC, and RAMC as the circuit's inductance, capacitance, and resistance, respectively. The circuit impedance is
The resonant frequency t and approximate fractional bandwidth (BW) in the limit ωLAMC<Z0 are
where Z0 is the incident wave impedance. The AMC shown in
YAMC=Yg+Yload+Ysub. (3)
Ysub=−j cot(√{square root over (εμ)}ωd)√{square root over (ε/μ)}, (4)
where d is the dielectric thickness, and ε and μ are the substrate's permittivity and permeability respectively. Ysub is expressed in terms of a frequency dependent inductance, Lsub=−j/(ωYsub) which is approximately a constant Lsub≅μd for thin substrates with √{square root over (εμ)}ωd<<1. The grid impedance of the metallic squares is capacitive, Yg=jωCg, and can be accurately estimated analytically.
The loaded AMC reflection properties can be estimated by equating the LRC circuit parameters of equation (1) to quantities in the transmission line model in equations (3) and (4). If the load is capacitive, then the equivalent LRC circuit parameters are
LAMC=Lsub, CAMC=Cg+Cload and RAMC=Rload. (5)
If the load is inductive as it is in the AAMC, then they are
An active AMC is created when the load inductance is negative, and LAMC increases according to (6). When Lload<0 and |Lload|>Lsub>0, then LAMC>Lsub, resulting in an increase in the AMC bandwidth, and a decrease in the resonant frequency according to (2). As Lload approaches −Lsub, LAMC increases towards a maximum, the resonant frequency ω0 decreases towards a minimum, and the bandwidth increases towards a maximum. Due to instability, the AMC will have a finite maximum LAMC and a finite minimum ω0 as Lload approaches −Lsub. The bandwidth and resonant frequency are prevented from going to infinity and zero respectively by the loss and capacitance of the NFC and the AMC structure.
NFCs become unstable when their applied bias voltage is too high, when they are subjected to excessive RF power, and/or when they are detrimentally coupled to neighboring NFCs. Their instability is manifested by circuit oscillation and emissions of radiation from the NFC circuit. When the NFCs in an AAMC become unstable, the AAMC can no longer operate as an AMC and can become useless. One consequence of this is that previously, it has not been possible to create a broadband dual-polarization AAMC because of the instability caused by the couplings between neighboring NFCs.
The stability of finite AAMCs can be approximated using eigenanalysis. For this, it is helpful to introduce the concept of a port. A port can be defined by a pair of terminals within an electrical network such as an AAMC or AMC. Generally, the current flowing into one terminal of the port equals the current flowing out of the other terminal. If the AAMC is loaded with NFCs, each port of the AAMC can be defined by a pair of terminals wherein the terminals are located at the edges of neighboring impedance elements where a single NFC is connected. A single NFC is connected across the terminals of each port. If the NFCs of the AAMC are removed, resulting in an AMC, the locations of the ports of the AMC would be unchanged to simplify the analysis of the AAMC and to ensure that the following condition holds: YAAMC=YAMC+YNFC, where YAAMC is the admittance of the AAMC, YAMC is the admittance of the AMC (which is equivalent to the AAMC with the NFCs removed), and YNFC is a scalar admittance matrix introduced by the NFCs. At frequencies below the resonance frequency, the admittance matrix of the AAMC can be approximated by self and mutual inductances of the ports of the AAMC:
where N is the number of ports in the AAMC, Lii for i=1 to N is the self inductance of the ith port, Lij for i=1 to N, j=1 to N, and i≠j is the mutual inductance between the ith and jth ports, and s=j2πf is the complex radian frequency of the Laplace transform. Thus the admittance matrix can be simplified to 1/s times an inductance matrix where the eigenvalues of the inductance matrix quantify an equivalent inverse inductance 1/Leq for a given eigenmode of the AAMC. Assuming all NFCs are identical with inductance LNFC<0 (L in
Turning to
While
An embodiment according to the principles of this invention is shown in
The shape of impedance elements 301 is not limited to the square shape shown and can be triangular, rectangular, elliptical, circular, octagonal, diamond, polygonal, etc. In addition, the shape of patch 301 can be x-like and/or non-uniform, wherein each patch 301 has a unique or non-unique, irregular shape.
The AAMC of
The AAMC of the present disclosure should not be limited to the crossover configuration shown in
The NFCs 302 can be any circuit having the aforementioned negative inductance and/or inductors. NFCs 302 can comprise combinations of negative inductance elements and/or inductors in parallel with negative capacitance elements and/or capacitors.
The AAMC of
Stability can be verified by analyzing the eigenmodes of the AAMC structure and ensuring that each NFC 302 has a magnitude of inductance |L| greater than the maximum intrinsic eigenmode Leq. The eigenmode inductances for a finite 6×6 AAMC structure, with NFCs 202 loaded between adjacent patches 201 as shown in
For the 6×6 AAMC, with the crossover structure shown in
The impedance elements 301 can be disposed in any suitable arrangement, including, but not limited to, a square lattice, a rectangular lattice, a triangular lattice, a spiral lattice, a hexagonal lattice, or any combination thereof. In addition, the impedance elements 301 can be separated by a distance that varies along the rows and/or columns of the array of impedance elements. The rows and/or columns of the array of impedance elements can be straight, spiral, or curvilinear.
The impedance elements 301 of the AAMC can comprise copper or any other conductive material. The thickness of the impedance elements 301 is preferably greater than the electromagnetic wave penetration depth, wherein the penetration depth is defined as the depth at which the intensity of the radiation inside the conductive patches 301 falls to 1/e of its original value at the surface of the conductive patch, where e is the base of the natural logarithm. The conductive patches 301 can be impenetrable to electromagnetic waves. The thickness of the conductive patches 301 can be thin compared to the unit cell dimension (thicknesspatch<λ/13 in a preferred embodiment, wherein λ is the wavelength of an incident wave). The AAMC can operate for any thickness in the range 0<thicknesspatch<unit cell size. A preferred method of manufacturing the AAMC can comprise etching copper with a standard thickness between 15 and 60 microns using printed circuit methods. Any metal manufacturing technique can be used: e.g. machining, pressing, forming, etching, electrodepositing, electroplating, or rolling metal. The bottom ground layer 305 can comprise a conductive sheet, which can comprise aluminum or any conductive material. Manufacturing methods used to form the impedance elements 301 can be used to form the ground layer 305. Circuits to power and bias the NFCs 302 can be placed under the ground plane, and signal traces for the bias circuits can be routed to each NFC 302 for example, through very small holes in the ground plane. In one embodiment, a multi-layer printed circuit board can be used to route signal traces to NFCs 302. The multi-layer printed circuit board can comprise a ground plane with holes/openings through which signal traces can be routed. Other layers in the multi-layer printed circuit board are used for signal trace routing.
In a preferred embodiment, the AAMC dielectric substrate 304 can comprise air so its relative permittivity is 1 or nearly 1. In this embodiment, the conductive patches 301 can be held in place by, for example, a thin insulating wire grid or a thin grid of substrate materials. Increasing the permittivity of the AAMC substrate 304 has a minor negative impact on the bandwidth of the AAMC. Increasing the permittivity increases the capacitance of the unloaded AAMC (note that bandwidth=(1/Z0)*sqrt(LAMC/CAMC)), though the value of CAMC is more determined by the capacitance of the NFC 302. Common microwave dielectrics have relative permittivity in the range of 1 to 10 (ε=1-10) but the AAMC structure can operate with any dielectric or dielectrics.
Most microwave materials have a permeability equal to 1 and can be included in a preferred embodiment. The first-order approximation of the substrate 304 inductance is dμr where d is the thickness of the substrate 304 and μr is the relative permeability of the substrate 304. Therefore the substrate 304 inductance is directly proportional to both the substrate 304 thickness and the relative permeability of the substrate 304. The AAMC can operate with any permeability.
The unit cell size in a preferred embodiment is 75 mm which is approximately λ/13 at a center frequency of 300 MHz. Using smaller unit cells reduces the capacitance CAMC of the AAMC and improves the bandwidth of the AAMC. However, using smaller unit cells requires more NFCs 302 per unit area of the AAMC, which increases manufacturing costs and operating power. The unit cell size can be less than λ/2 to operate as an AAMC. The substrate 304 thickness is 25 mm in a preferred embodiment, which is λ/40 at a center frequency of 300 MHz. The substrate 304 thickness preferably in the range between 0 to λ/4.
The AAMC preferably comprises a square array of impedance elements 301 because, for example, it provides an isotropic surface. The diagonal, crossover loading of the NFCs 302 can improve the stability and bandwidth of AAMCs having other lattice geometries including but not limited to: rectangular, anisotropic, radial, non-homogeneous lattices. The AAMC structure can also be conformal and/or curved in one or two dimensions. The edges of the AAMC structure can be terminated with metal walls in a preferred embodiment. These metal walls can couple the ground plane 305 to the impedance elements 301 located on the edges of the AAMC, and further couple these impedance elements 301 to one another. The structure can be terminated in other ways including but not limited to: a cavity shorted only to the ground plane 305 with full or half unit cells reaching the edge of the structure, a cavity with AAMC side walls, an electrically large ground plane, a finite ground plane, a cylindrical or spherical structure, any closed continuous structure, a curved but finite implementation of any of the previously listed terminations.
The methods of fabricating the AAMC can be apparent from
Though NFCs 302 are used, other structures are known in the art to provide the necessary negative inductances and/or negative capacitances. Similar crossover structures of the NFCs 302 can be extended to radial lattices/arrays and other topologies of unit cells, and other ways of interconnecting impedance elements. This disclosure is intended to cover all such variations in structure and topology.
In this writing, the term “neighboring” means “nearby” and does not necessarily imply a common boundary so that, for example, a first row and a second row are neighboring rows if they are separated by 0 or more rows. A “nearest neighbor” is a neighboring element that is the closest in proximity as compared to other neighboring elements. If several neighboring elements are equally closest to a first element, that first element has several nearest neighbors. In this writing, the term “adjacent” means “neighboring” and further implies a common boundary so that a first row is adjacent a second row only if a third row is not between the first and second row.
In this writing, the term “diagonally” means “along a diagonal direction” as compared to an axis with a traditional vertical y-axis and horizontal x-axis, wherein a diagonal direction can be defined with respect to the rows and columns in the array of impedance elements, as shown in
In this writing, the word “conductive” preferably means “electrically conductive”.
Modifications, additions, or omissions can be made to the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein without departing from the scope of the invention. The components of the systems and apparatuses can be integrated or separated. Moreover, the operations of the systems and apparatuses can be performed by more, fewer, or other components. The methods can include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps can be performed in any suitable order. As used in this document, “each” refers to each member of a set or each member of a subset of a set.
Concepts
Concept 1. An artificial magnetic conductor comprising:
an array of impedance elements;
a plurality of non-Foster circuits coupled between neighboring impedance elements in the array of impedance elements so as to form a first network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits and a second network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits, wherein the impedance elements of the first network are interleaved between the impedance elements of the second network.
Concept 2. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, wherein the non-Foster circuits of the first network and the non-Foster circuits of the second network form crossover configurations.
Concept 3. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, wherein the impedance elements are arranged in a plurality of rows and columns, forming a rectangular or square lattice of impedance elements.
Concept 4. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 3, wherein columns of the plurality of rows and columns are staggered.
Concept 5. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 4, wherein the impedance elements arranged in the plurality of rows and staggered columns form a triangular lattice of impedance elements.
Concept 6. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, wherein the impedance elements are arranged to form a spiral lattice.
Concept 7. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 2, wherein each non-Foster circuit has a negative inductance; and
wherein the impedance elements are square or rectangular in shape; and
wherein the impedance elements are electrically conductive patches.
Concept 8. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 7, wherein the negative inductances of the non-Foster circuits are tunable.
Concept 9. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 7, wherein each non-Foster circuit has a negative capacitance.
Concept 10. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 7, wherein each non-Foster circuit comprises a negative inductor and a negative capacitor.
Concept 11. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, further comprising
shunts;
a dielectric substrate; and
a ground plane, wherein the impedance elements are disposed on the dielectric substrate, and wherein the shunts couple the impedance elements of the first and second networks to the ground plane, thereby coupling the first network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits to the second network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits.
Concept 12. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 11, wherein each shunt has an inductance that reduces the mutual coupling between the impedance elements.
Concept 13. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 11, wherein the impedance elements are metallic.
Concept 14. An active artificial magnetic conductor comprising:
a dielectric surface
an array of unit cells, each unit cell comprising:
impedance elements arranged along the dielectric surface; and
non-Foster circuits coupled between the impedance elements so as to form a first network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits and a second network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits within each unit cell;
wherein non-Foster circuits couple impedance elements between neighboring unit cells.
Concept 15. An artificial magnetic conductor comprising:
an array of impedance elements arranged along a surface;
a plurality of non-Foster circuits coupling said impedance elements to each other so as to form a first network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits and a second network of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits;
wherein the first and second networks of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits are distinct, interleaved networks of impedance elements and non-Foster circuits.
Concept 16. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 15, wherein the non-Foster circuits of the first network are coupled between the impedance elements of the first network and the non-Foster circuits of the second network are coupled between the impedance elements of the second network.
Concept 17. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 16, wherein the non-Foster circuits of the first network are not coupled between the impedance elements of the second network.
Concept 18. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 17, wherein the non-Foster circuits of the second network are not coupled between the impedance elements of the first network.
Concept 19. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 15, wherein the impedance elements of the first network are interleaved between the impedance elements of the second network.
Concept 20. A broadband active artificial magnetic conductor comprising:
non-foster circuits;
conductive patches, wherein at least one non-foster circuit is connected to each conductive patch, the conductive patches each having edges, wherein the non-foster circuits connect to the edges of the patches.
Concept 21. The conductor of Concept 20 wherein the edges of each conductive patch form corners, the non-foster circuits connecting the conductive patches between corners.
Concept 22. The conductor of Concept 21 wherein the conductive patches are square or rectangular in shape.
Concept 23. The conductor of Concept 20 wherein the patches are grouped such that through the connections of the non-foster circuits, one group is interleaved with respect to the other group.
Concept 24. The conductor of Concept 20 further comprising a ground and vias, the vias connecting the patches to the ground.
Concept 25. The conductor of Concept 20 wherein the conductive patches have a thickness, the thickness being greater than the electromagnetic wave penetration depth of the conductive patches.
Concept 26. The conductor of Concept 1 wherein the array of impedance elements is arranged in rows and columns, the conductor further comprising a dielectric substrate on which the array is arranged, the array being arranged with a distance or gap positioned between adjacent impedance elements, wherein the non-foster circuits are arranged in the gaps to couple the neighboring impedance elements in a crossover configuration.
Concept 27. The conductor of Concept 26 wherein the non-foster circuits comprise at least one of negative inductors and negative capacitors, the negative inductors and negative capacitors being coupled in parallel between neighboring impedance elements.
Concept 28. The conductor of Concept 14 wherein the array of unit cells is periodic to reflect electromagnetic waves polarized parallel to the surface with a zero-degree phase.
Concept 29. The conductor of Concept 20, wherein the non-foster circuits couple diagonally neighboring conductive patches.
Concept 30. The artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, wherein the non-Foster circuits are diagonally connected between the impedance elements.
Concept 31. The active artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 14, wherein the non-Foster circuits are diagonally connected between the impedance elements within each unit cell.
Concept 32. The active artificial magnetic conductor of Concept 1, wherein the neighboring impedance elements have pairs of edges defining ports, wherein at frequencies below a resonant frequency, an admittance matrix of the active artificial magnetic conductor is approximated by:
where N is the number of ports in the AAMC, Lii for i=1 to N is the self inductance of the ith port, Lij for i=1 to N, j=1 to N, and i≠j is the mutual inductance between the ith and jth ports, and s=j2πf is the complex radian frequency of the Laplace transform.
The invention was made with Government support and that the Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234960 | Spilsbury | Nov 1980 | A |
4242685 | Sanford | Dec 1980 | A |
4803494 | Norris et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4904952 | Tanimoto | Feb 1990 | A |
4916457 | Foy et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5311198 | Sutton | May 1994 | A |
5392002 | Delano | Feb 1995 | A |
5489878 | Gilbert | Feb 1996 | A |
6081167 | Kromat | Jun 2000 | A |
6121940 | Skahill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6304226 | Brown et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6411261 | Lilly | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476771 | McKinzie | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483480 | Sievenpiper et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6509875 | Nair et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512494 | Diaz | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518930 | Itoh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525695 | McKinzie, III | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538621 | Sievenpiper | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6768472 | Alexopoulos et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6917343 | Sanchez | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952565 | Takeda | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7042419 | Werner et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7245269 | Sievenpiper | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7388186 | Berg et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7429961 | Sievenpiper et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7586384 | Ranta | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619568 | Gillette | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7847633 | Kinget | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852174 | Cathelin | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880568 | Amin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7941022 | Schaffner et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8111111 | Van Bezooijen | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8263939 | Delaney et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283553 | Yap et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8358989 | Kakuya et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374561 | Yung | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8436785 | Lai et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8451189 | Fluhler | May 2013 | B1 |
8471776 | Das | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8639203 | Robert et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8957831 | Gregoire | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8959831 | Smith | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8988173 | Hitko et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976077 | Colburn et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9093753 | Jung | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9379448 | Gregoire | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9425769 | White et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9705201 | White et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10103445 | Gregoire et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10193233 | Gregoire | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10739437 | Toyao | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20010050641 | Itoh et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020041205 | Oppelt | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020167456 | McKinzie, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167457 | McKinzie, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030020655 | McKinzie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030071763 | McKinzie, et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076274 | Phelan | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030112186 | Sanchez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040056814 | Park et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040227667 | Sievenpiper | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227668 | Sievenpiper | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263420 | Werner | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050146475 | Bettner | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184922 | Ida et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060017651 | Werner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070182639 | Sievenpiper | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080088390 | Cathelin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094300 | Lee | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164955 | Pfeiffer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169992 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080242237 | Rofougaran et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080284674 | Herz | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025973 | Kazantsev et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090109121 | Herz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100039111 | Luekeke et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039343 | Uno et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100149430 | Fulga et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100225395 | Patterson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231470 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238085 | Fuh et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110018649 | David et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110090128 | Sulima et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115584 | Kiji | May 2011 | A1 |
20120256709 | Hitko et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256811 | Colburn | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287006 | Lenormand et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130009720 | White et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009722 | White et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130170020 | Davis | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200947 | Alexopoulos | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268250 | Werner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150244079 | White | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244080 | Gregoire et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150263432 | White | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101853974 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102005648 | Apr 2011 | CN |
0295704 | Dec 1988 | EP |
2290745 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2288502 | Oct 1995 | GB |
2008278159 | Nov 2008 | JP |
200845482 | Nov 2008 | TW |
2004013933 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006054246 | May 2006 | WO |
2009090244 | Jul 2009 | WO |
PCTUS1232638 | Apr 2012 | WO |
PCTUS1232648 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012139071 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012139079 | Oct 2012 | WO |
PCTUS1472233 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015126521 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,541, filed Sep. 16, 2015, Daniel J. Gregoire. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/473,076, filed Apr. 7, 2011, Joseph S. Colburn et al. |
Gregoire, D.; White, C.; Colburn J., “Wideband Artificial Magnetic Conductors Loaded with Non-Foster Negative Inductors,” Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE , vol. 10, 1586-1589, 2011. |
D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. Broas, N. Alexopolous, and E. Yablonovitch, “High-impedance Electromagnetic Surfaces with a Forbidden Frequency Band,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 2059-2074, Nov. 1999. |
F. Costa, S. Genovesi, and A. Monorchio, “On the Bandwidth of High-Impedance Frequency Selective Surfaces”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 1341-1344, 2009. |
D. J. Kern, D. H. Werner and M. H. Wilhelm, “Active Negative Impedance Loaded EBG Structures for the Realization of Ultra-Wideband Artificial Magnetic Conductors,” Proc. IEEE Ant. Prop. Int. Symp., vol. 2, 2003, pp. 427-430. |
White, C. R.; May, J. W.; Colburn, J. S., “A Variable Negative-Inductance Integrated Circuit at UHF Frequencies,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 21, No. 1, 35-37, 2012. |
O. Luukkonen et al, “Simple and Accurate Analytical Model of Planar Grids and High-Impedance Surfaces”, IEEE Transactions an Antennas Propagation, vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 1624-1632, 2008. |
R. M. Foster., “A Reactance Theorem”, Bell Systems Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 259-267, 1924. |
Gregoire, D. J.; Colburn, J. S.; White, C. R., “A Coaxial TEM Cell for Direct Measurement of UHF Artificial Magnetic Conductors”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 251-250, 2012. |
Stearns, “Non-Foster Circuits and Stability Theory,” Proc. IEEE Ant. Prop. Int. Symp., 2011, pp. 1942-1945. |
S. E. Sussman-Fort and R. M. Rudish. “Non-Foster Impedance Matching of Electrically-Small Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 2230-2241, Aug. 2009. |
C. R. White and G. M. Rebeiz, “A Shallow Varactor-Tuned Cavity-Backed Slot Antenna with a 1.9:1 Tuning Range,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 633-639, 2010. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280033448.2, PRC Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2015 with Brief English summary. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396, Non Final Rejection dated Sep. 11, 2015. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021746.X, PRC Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2015 with brief English summary. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280033448.2, PRC Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2015 with machine English translation. |
Pozar, David M., Microwave Engineering, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998, pp. 89-90 and pp. 629-631 with table of contents (16 pages). |
Sandel, B., Chapter 23, Radio Frequency Amplifiers, A.S.T.C., pp. 912-946, (1960). |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396, Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015. |
EPO Extended Search Report with Search Opinion dated Mar. 19, 2015 from European Patent Application No. 12806913.5. |
Mirzaei et al., “A Wideband Metamaterial-Inspired Compact Antenna Using Embedded Non-Foster Matching,” 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURI), pp. 1950-1953, (2011). |
Adonin, et al., “Monolith Optoelectronic Integrated Circuit With Built-In Photovoltaic Supply for Control and Monitoring,” 1998 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 529-531, (1998). |
Gower, John, Optical Communications Systems, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, 1993, pp. 40-46. |
From Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2014 from Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021746 with English summary. |
Gregoire, et al., “A Coaxial TEM cell for Direct Measurement of UHF Artificial Magnetic Conductors”, IEEE Antenna and Propagation Magazine, vol. 54, pp. 251-259, 2012. |
Slideshow for “Matching Network Design Using Non-Foster Impedances” by Stephen E. Sussman-Fort, Ph.D. of EDO Corporation (printed from the Internet on Jun. 30, 2011) (pp. 1-43). |
Cyril Svetoslavov Mechkov, “A heuristic approach to teaching negative resistance phenomenon,” Third International Conference-Computer Science '06, Istanbul, Turkey, Oct. 12-15, 2006 (pp. 1-6). |
White Paper by the Virginia Tech Antenna Group of Wireless @ Virgina Tech, “Non-Foster Reactance Matching for Antennas,” pp. 1-5, http://wireless.vt.edu/research/Antennas_Propagation/Whitepapers/Whitepaper-Non-Foster_Reactance_Matching_for_Antennas.pdf, published at least before Apr. 27, 2010. |
Sussman-Fort, S., “Gyrator-Based Biquad Filters and Negative Impedance Converters for Microwaves,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 86-101, (1998). |
Sussman-Fort, S. E., “Matching Network Design Using Non-Foster Impedances,”International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 1-8, (Mar. 2006). |
S.E. Sussman and R.M. Rudish, “Non-Foster Impedance matching for transmit applications,” IEEE Xplore, EDO Corporation and Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering. pp. 53-56, Mar. 2006. |
Sussman-Fort, S. E. And Rudish, R. M., “Increasing Efficiency or Bandwidth of Electrically Small Transmit Antennas by Impedance Matching With Non-Foster Circuits,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium 2006, pp. 137 and pp. 1-22, (Mar. 2006). |
Bezooijen et al. “RF-MEMS Based Adaptive Antenna Matching Module,” IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 573-576, (2007). |
J.G. Linvill, “Transistor negative-impedance converters”, Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 41, pp. 725-729, Jun. 1953. |
Brennan et al., “The CMOS Negative Impedance Converter,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1272-1275, (Oct. 1988). |
Fong et al., “Scalar and Tensor Holographic Artificial Impedance Surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 3212-3221, (Oct. 2010). |
Colburn et al., “Adaptive Artificial Impedance Surface Conformal Antennas,” Proceedings IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 1-4, (2009). |
K. Song and R.G. Rojas, “Non-foster impedance matching of electrically small antennas, ”Proc. IEEE Ant. Prop. Int. Symp., pp. 1-4, Jul. 2010. |
D.J. Gregoire, et al.,“Non-foster metamaterials”, Antenna Applications Symposium 2011, pp. 1-15, Sep. 2011. |
EPO Supplementary European Search Report with European Search Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2014 from European Patent Application No. 12768357.1. |
Chen, Y., “Wideband Varactorless LC VCO Using a Tunable Negative-Inductance Cell,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, I: Regular Papers, vol. 57, No. 10, pp. 2609-2617, (Oct. 2010). |
Ramirez-Angulo, J. And Holmes, M., “Simple Technique Using Local CMFB to Enhance Slew Rate and Bandwidth of One-Stage CMOS op-amps,” Electronics Letters, vol., 38, No. 23, pp. 1409-1411, (Nov. 2002). |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 2012800334482 Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2014 with English translation. |
Staple et al., “The End of Spectrum Scarcity,” published by IEEE Spectrum, pp. 1-5, (Mar. 2004). |
EPO Supplementary European Search Report with European Search Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2014 from European Patent Application No. 12767559.3. |
Hrabar et al., “Towards Active Dispersionless ENZ Metamaterial for Cloaking Applications,” Metamaterials, vol. 4, No. 2-3, pp. 89-97, (Jul. 2010). |
Kern D. J., et al., “Design of Reconfigurable Electromagnetic Bandgap Surfaces as Artificial Magnetic Conducting Ground Planes and Absorbers”, Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 2006, IEEE Albuquerque, NM, USA Jul. 9-14, 2006, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jul. 9, 2006, pp. 197-200. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,563 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,374,561), Application and Office Actions including but not limited to the Office Actions dated Jun. 13, 2012; Oct. 9, 2012; and Oct. 23, 2012, pp. 1-19. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 10, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,730, Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,479, Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/177,479, Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396, Office Action dated Dec. 2, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,396, Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2014. |
From Chinese Patent Application No. 201280021449.5, PRC First Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 with machine translation. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032638, Chapter II, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Jun. 27, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032638, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Oct. 29, 2012. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032648, Chapter I, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Oct. 8, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/032648, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Dec. 14, 2012. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/045632, Chapter II, International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) dated Jul. 10, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/045632, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Jan. 10, 2013. |
From PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072233, International Search Report and Written Opinion (ISR & WO) dated Mar. 16, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072233 dated Aug. 30, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 24, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/441,659 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 8,976,077), Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 30, 2014. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2017. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2017. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2017. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,039 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,103,445 ), Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2018. |
Satellite Communication Payload and System by Teresa M. Braum, Wiley-IEEE Press, Sep. 2012, entire document. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,076 Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,076 Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,076 Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 14, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,076 Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2017. |
He, et al., 3D broadband isotropic NRI metamaterial based on metallic cross-pairs, Jouranl of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Mar. 2011, entire document. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,264 Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,225 Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,225 Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,737 Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2015. |
From U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,737, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
EPO Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2018 from European Patent Application No. 12806913.5. |
EPO Office Action dated May 16, 2019 from European Patent Application No. 12768357.1. |
EPO Office Action dated May 31, 2018 from European Patent Application No. 12767559.3. |
EPO Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2019 from European Patent Application No. 12767559.3. |