1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a broadcast spreader and more particularly to a broadcast spreader having a simple and reliable movable deflector.
2. Description of the Related Art
Rotary broadcast spreaders are well known in the art. For example, reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,769,302; 1,998,966; 2,287,080; 2,474,064; 2,537,916; 2,687,892; 2,955,828; 2,958,530; 2,989,314; 3,085,807; 3,094,333; 3,109,657; 3,157,402; 3,226,461; 3,411,719; 3,478,970; 3,576,262; 3,682,395; 4,272,028; 4,367,848; 4,492,341; 4,511,090; 4,580,730; 4,597,531; 5,123,598; and 5,203,510. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,580,730 and 4,597,531, in particular, are incorporated herein by reference. An impeller broadcast spreader includes a hopper which receives material to be dispensed, such as particulate or granular materials like fertilizer, pesticides and seeds. The hopper is mounted to a pair of wheels, and a gearset is mounted to an axle between the wheels. The gearset rotates when the wheels are rotated. This causes the impeller to rotate which in turn causes the dispensing particulate matter to be distributed. Generally the dispensed material is spread about five feet to the left and to the right of the centerline of the hopper. Controls are provided to meter the dispensed material and a deflector may be present with its own control, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,511,090.
A problem that has been bothering the industry is the handling of dispensed material when there is a sharp divide between different areas of a yard. For example, grass may be immediately adjacent a flowerbed or a driveway. In these situations when there is a need to seed or fertilize the lawn area, but not have the seed land on the driveway where it will do no good or in the flowerbed where it is not wanted, adjusting the pattern of distribution is difficult. Another problem relates to the dispensing of certain material. It is desired that control products, such as herbicides and pesticides, be restricted only to the area intended and not where it may do damage.
The difficulties encountered have been overcome by the present invention. What is described here is a spreader for broadcasting particulate material in a controlled distribution pattern comprising a container for holding material to be dispensed, a pair of wheels connected to the container for facilitating movement of the container in a direction of travel, a rotatable plate mounted to the container for receiving dispensed material from the container and for distributing the material, a mechanism for rotating the plate, a deflector connected to the container for controlling the distribution of the material, the deflector being movable about the plate, a track attached to the container for supporting the deflector, a port disposed between the container and the plate for passing dispensed material and a port closure element connected to and movable with the deflector for selectively blocking the port.
There are a number of advantages, features and objects achieved with the present invention which are believed not to be available in earlier related devices. For example, one advantage is that the present invention provides a control of the pattern of dispensing material from a yard spreader. Another object of the present invention is to provide a broadcast spreader having a dispensing control mechanism which is simple, reliable and economical. A further advantage of the present invention is that the dispensing control mechanism is easy to operate. Another feature of the present invention is that undesirable dispensed material is blocked from striking a user pushing the spreader from behind.
A more complete understanding of the present invention and other objects, advantages and features thereof will be gained from a consideration of the following description of the preferred embodiment read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing provided herein.
While the present invention is open to various modifications and alternative constructions, the preferred embodiment shown in the drawing will be described herein in detail. It is understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalent structures and methods, and alternative constructions falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
The simplicity of the new spreader may be seen by referring first to
Located beneath the hopper 12 is a rotatable plate, rotor plate or impeller 30 which is driven by a set of gears within a gearbox 32. The upper portion of the tubular handle may include a foam grip 34, and the spreader may be foldable at a junction 36 to allow storage and shipping in a compact configuration. A hopper closure assembly including a closure lever 40, an adjustment micrometer 42, a control wire 44 and a slidable closure plate 46 are provided to allow an operator to meter the amount of material which leaves the hopper. The hopper has an opening 45,
The deflector and track are simple, reliable and economical as reference to
Referring now to
The deflector may be rotated between a retracted position as shown in
The radially extending arm portion 104 extends from the leading end of the arcuate shaped portion 106 and includes a circular rim 114 and a bearing ring 116 that mates with a center post of the rotatable plate 30. Extending beyond the circular rim is a projecting closure panel 118. This panel acts as a valve for partially blocking a port through which the dispensing material flows when the spreader is operating and the closure plate 46 unblocks the hopper opening 45. When the deflector is rotated relative to the mounting track, the blocking panel 118 also rotates and moves relative to the port for partially blocking the port to reduce the flow of dispensing material.
It should be noted that while the deflector rotated about the axis of rotation of the rotor plate in a generally horizontal plane, the deflector is offset slightly, about 0.030 inches, so that a lesser movement of a control lever is able to set the deflector's disposition. Also, forming the deflector as a molded, integral piece, means that only one operating lever is needed since the arcuate portion of the deflector and the arm portion with the closure panel move as one element. To facilitate movement of the deflector a hole 120 is formed in the radially extending arm portion 104. The cable 80 leading to a control lever 122,
Referring now to
Referring to
It is again noted that regardless of the position of the deflector, it will be impacted by dispensed material when the spreader is operating. Also the user will always be protected from rearward projecting dispensed material. Both of these features are advantages of the present invention. It is further noted that because of the slight offset of the deflector, it will still rotate in a generally horizontal plane but it will move slightly outwardly and forwardly. Essentially, there is no vertical movement which may expose the region to the rear of the rotor plate to dispensing material as is the case with some older spreaders.
Again referring to
The linkage mechanism for controlling the deflector includes the cable 80 attached to the deflector arm portion 104 after passing through the passage 79 in the track. The cable leads to the control lever 122, mounted to the handle 24. The lever may be operated by a user's thumb to extend or retract the cable and thereby to rotate the deflector one way or the other. It is noted that the same control lever operates both the deflector and the closure panel.
In operation, a user 140,
The full spread pattern shown in
The specification describes in detail an embodiment of the present invention. Other modifications and variations will, under the doctrine of equivalents, come within the scope of the appended claims. For example, changing the dimensions of the hopper, the hopper opening, the port size, the deflector or any other element will still result in equivalent structures. Also changing the arcuate extent of the deflector and/or the mounting track are also considered equivalent structures. Still other alternatives will also be equivalent as will many new technologies. There is no desire or intention here to limit in any way the application of the doctrine of equivalents.
The present application is a divisional of Ser. No. 09/847,462 filed 2 May 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,074 on 9 Sep. 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
396251 | Adamson | Jan 1889 | A |
1215955 | Mehlberger | Feb 1917 | A |
1498086 | Ford | Jun 1924 | A |
1644031 | Pulliam | Oct 1927 | A |
1769302 | MacGregor | Jul 1930 | A |
1998966 | Plas | Apr 1935 | A |
2287080 | Arndt | Jun 1942 | A |
2474065 | Porter | Jun 1949 | A |
2537913 | Rimple | Jan 1951 | A |
2687892 | Kinsella | Aug 1954 | A |
2856191 | Kolb | Oct 1958 | A |
2955828 | Kinsella | Oct 1960 | A |
2958530 | Kucera et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
2989314 | Larson | Jun 1961 | A |
3085807 | Tyler | Apr 1963 | A |
3094333 | Rausch | Jun 1963 | A |
3109657 | Dreyer | Nov 1963 | A |
3157402 | Love, Jr. | Nov 1964 | A |
3226461 | Wise et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3232627 | Larson | Feb 1966 | A |
3411719 | Babiciu et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3478970 | Siwersson et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3576262 | Konchesky et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3682395 | van der Lely et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
4027627 | Fillion | Jun 1977 | A |
4186885 | Christian | Feb 1980 | A |
4272028 | Cobb | Jun 1981 | A |
4367848 | Ehmke et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4492341 | Allen | Jan 1985 | A |
4511090 | Morgan | Apr 1985 | A |
4580730 | Amerine | Apr 1986 | A |
4597531 | Kise | Jul 1986 | A |
4798325 | Block | Jan 1989 | A |
5123598 | Courtney et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5203510 | Courtney et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5340033 | Whitell | Aug 1994 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030192968 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09847462 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10443702 | US |