1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a brush and a holder assembly therefor, particularly for a micro horsepower (hereinafter HP) electric motor.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
A micro HP electric motor may be defined as one operating at 0.001 HP or less. Such a micro HP electric motor may have a maximum torque between 1.2 and 1.6 inch-ounces. Similarly, a fractional HP electric motor may be defined as an electric motor operating at less than one HP but more than 0.001 HP.
In the known prior art, a leaf spring usually acts as a brush holder. This leaf spring routinely gets hot because current is carried through the leaf spring to the brush itself. As a result of the heat generated by the electric current passing through the leaf spring, arcing often occurs and causes wear on the commutator. This wear consequently reduces the efficiency of the electric motor.
A preliminary patentability search uncovered several U.S. patents disclosing devices with structures similar to the present invention but for usage in large electric motors having much more than one horsepower. Thus, it would not be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the related art to modify these prior art devices for use in fractional and micro HP electric motors without ignoring their teachings which are directed to large-scale electric motors.
The most pertinent prior art references are believed to be the following: U.S. Pat. No. 4,163,167 which was issued to Zelt et al. on Jul. 31, 1979; U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,465 which was issued to Gagneux on Dec. 17, 1985; U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,220 which was issued to Cousins et al. on Jun. 3, 1986; U.S. Pat. No. 5,907,207 which was issued to Peot et al. on May 25, 1999; U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,351 which was issued to Bohart et al. on Jan. 2, 2001; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,563,245 which was issued to Suzuki et al. on May 13, 2003.
Other secondary prior art references are believed to be the following: U.S. Pat. No. 4,085,346 which was issued to Yoshida on Apr. 18, 1978; U.S. Pat. No. 4,088,912 which was issued to Yoshida on May 9, 1978; U.S. Pat. No. 4,238,703 which was issued to Yoshida on Dec. 9, 1980; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,749,899 which was issued to Ishizawa et al. on Jun. 7, 1988.
Five examples of prior art brush and brush holders are illustrated schematically in
In many cases after a heavy electrical load is applied, particularly when operating in high-temperature ambient environments, the spring 16 of
In
Approximately 95% of micro motors, such as those used in cameras, recorders, small gear motors, etc., use the leaf or so-called blade-type prior art brush holder seen in
In order to improve the performance of micro motors, particularly those used in small electrical appliances, some manufacturers have recently developed a more complicated brush and brush holder system which is shown in
Despite developments in the prior art, no simple brush and brush holder system for carrying current to a micro motor has been developed to reduce spring failure, to eliminate arcing and to prevent destruction of the commutator, thereby making the micro motor more stable and more efficient.
A primary object of the invention is to provide a brush and a brush holder system for carrying minimal current to a micro motor or the like so that the spring does not fail, arcing is eliminated and the commutator is not destroyed.
A secondary object of the invention is to provide a brush and a brush holder system that makes a micro motor, operating at 0.001 HP or less, more stable and more efficient than micro motors using known prior art brush and brush holder systems.
In the invention, an independent coil wire spring provides a constant pressure on the brush and the current is carried to the brush by a wavy pin tail or a shunt so that there is no spring retardation caused by current flow therein.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of its advantages will be readily obtained as the invention becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the schematic view, attention is directed to
The features of the invention will become apparent in the course of the following description of the exemplary embodiment which is given for illustration of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiment shown in
In
An independent coil wire spring 53 is wrapped tightly around a projection 72 on a plastic post 70. One end 53E of the spring 53 is free while another end 53A of the spring 53 protrudes into the cutout portion 55 of the brush holder 58 and applies constant pressure to a recessed portion 50R in the tip 51 of the brush 50. An advantage of the recessed portion 50R in the tip 51 is that it keeps the end 53A of the spring 53 always in contact with the brush 50 so that the end 53A will not jump away from the tip 51 if the brush 50 and the spring 53 are jarred. The spring 53 is considered independent because it does not carry electric current.
Interestingly, this approach will not work in fractional HP motors operating above 0.001 but less than 1.0 HP because the wavy pin tail or shunt 56 must be made thicker to carry the higher current. Consequently, it has been found that, when the current is higher and the shunt 56 is thick enough to carry such a current so that a fractional HP motor can be operated between 0.001 and 1.0 HP, the shunt 56 quickly loses its resilience and breaks.
Accordingly, since this approach will not work in fractional HP motors, a person of ordinary skill in this technology would assume that this approach would also not work in micro motors, thus teaching away from the present invention. Nevertheless, contrary to expectations, the inventor combined some elements used in the prior art brush systems operating in heavy duty motors up to 20 HP, as shown in
Clearly, numerous modifications and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, it should be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced in other ways than as specifically described hereinabove.