The present invention provides a system and method for performing a biopsy of the uterus. More particularly, it is a device that disrupts and samples cells from the endometrium, and simultaneously takes a sample with an abrasive brush and an aspirate.
The present technology represents improvements over U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,351,712, 8,920,336, 8,517,956, and 8,348,856, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Those patents, in turn, represent an improvement over the Cook Medical Tao Brush™ I.U.M.C. Endometrial Sampler, and the Pipelle endometrial biopsy device (See, Sierecki A R, Gudipudi D K, Montemarano N, Del Priore G., “Comparison of endometrial aspiration biopsy techniques: specimen adequacy.” J Reprod Med. 53(10):760-4, 2008 October), expressly incorporated herein by reference.
As shown in
1. Position screw-cap test tube containing 8 ml of CytoRich® Brush Cytology Preservative (AutoCyte, Inc., Elon College, NC) in a test-tube rack at the site of the procedure.
2. Place patient in lithotomy position.
3. Retract the brush sampler completely into the outer sheath. (
4. Gently insert the device to the level of the fundus. (
5. Pull back the outer sheath all the way to the handle. Amply rotate the brush sampler. (
Two methods are suggested:
1) Rotate brush sampler in a clockwise manner until reference mark on the handle indicates completion of a 360° turn, then rotate counterclockwise the (opposite direction) until the reference mark on the handle indicates completion of a 360° turn;
2) Rotate the brush sampler in only one direction by completing 4 or 5 360° rotations. NOTE: Reference mark on handle indicates completion of a 360° rotation.
6. In order to trap endometrial material in situ, push the outer sheath over the brush to the tip and remove the device. (
7. Immediately immerse the device into 8 ml of CytoRich® Brush Cytology Preservative.
8. Retract the sheath to expose the brush to preservative solution.
9. Hold the sheath firmly and move the brush in and out of the sheath to clean it of adherent cells and tissue. (
10. Remove the brush assembly from the test-tube, replace the screw cap, and submit the tube to the laboratory for processing.
To Obtain Uncontaminated Endometrial Cultures
1. After insertion of a sterile, nonlubricated vaginal speculum, swab the ectocervix and the endocervical canal with povidone iodine solution. NOTE: Insert the swab about 1.5 cm into the endocervical canal to ensure adequate swabbing of the endocervix with the povidone.
2. Insert the brush into the endometrial cavity following steps 3-6 from the section preceding these instructions. The reference mark on the handle indicates completion of a 360° turn.
3. Remove sampler.
4. Wipe the rounded tip of the brush with 95% alcohol gauze.
5. Pull back the sheath. Prepare morphologic evaluation (if required) by preparing a direct smear on a sterile glass slide and spray-fix immediately.
6. For culture studies, place the brush into sterile Stuarts Transportation Medium and agitate for 5 seconds
However, according to the Tao Brush™ design and that of U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,351,712, 8,920,336, 8,517,956, and 8,348,856, the brush is inserted either an arbitrary or estimated distance, or until resistance is encountered by the tip of the brush pushing against the fundus of the uterus, which risks unnecessary tissue damage, and in some cases, complications.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,351,712, 8,920,336, 8,517,956, and 8,348,856 discuss an intrauterine biopsy sampling device having a narrow cylindrical tube with a guidewire and biopsy sampling device at the end at the end of the guidewire, similar to a Cook Medical (Bloomington, Ind.) Tao Brush™ I.U.M.C. Endometrial Sampler, modified such that disposed within the sheath, is a piston-like structure which, when the wire is withdrawn through the sheath, draws a vacuum and sucks fluid surrounding the guidewire into the sheath. A vacuum biopsy sampling device, such as the known Pipelle endometrial suction curette produces a vacuum and draws it into the sheath by a similar principle, but lacks the brush or other biopsy sampling device at its distal end.
The device is a 1-3 mm diameter by 30-40 cm long coaxial “straw” 1 that can easily pass into the uterus endometrial cavity with little or no discomfort. It is malleable but rigid enough to apply sufficient force to pass through the cervix. In the center of the outer sheath, which is an impermeable tube, a thinner inner insert 2 can be extended beyond the end of the tube 3 into the uterus. Proximal from the biopsy brush is a suction element 4, which draws liquid into the sheath when the guidewire is withdrawn. The inner obturator disrupts the uterus to loosen and collect a biopsy sample of the uterus. The tissue sampling device includes a spirally twisted flexible wire with opposed proximal and distal ends. Also included is a plastic tube covering a significant portion of the wire to provide additional rigidity without making the overall brush stiff.
Along the distal end portion of the wire is a brush that includes bristles that were used for collecting a tissue sample. The bristles are fixed within the spirally twisted wire near the distal end and are tapered from smaller to larger towards the distal end of the wire. Tapering of the bristles from the distal end of the device allows for more global tissue collection of the endometrium because of the shape of the endometrial cavity. An atraumatic bulb is located on the extreme distal end of the twisted wire. The plastic tube and twisted wire are contained within a sheath of shorter length than the twisted wire, such that the sheath can be moved along the plastic tube to the atraumatic bulb on the distal end of the twisted wire, thereby covering the brush during insertion and removal after tissue collection.
Before insertion, the sheath can be moved into position over the distal end of the twisted wire to protect the brush during insertion. Having the brush covered during insertion also increases comfort for the patient and protects the brush from collecting tissue from unintended areas. The sheath is moved back toward the proximal end of the twisted wire after the device has been inserted to the proper collection depth, exposing the brush and allowing for collection of a tissue sample. The sheath may be moved to completely uncover the brush or may be moved in gradients to uncover portions of the brush. This allows the practitioner to adjust the effective collection area of the brush based on the anatomy of the patient.
The plastic tube covering the wire is scored in centimeter gradations along the plastic tube with markings indicating the exact length of the brush inserted into the uterus, starting from the distal tip of the brush to the proximal end of the plastic tube. This allows the clinician to know how deeply the brush is inserted into the uterus. The sheath is approximately the same length as the plastic tube and in position to cover the brush bristles prior to insertion. The sheath may be formed of a clear material such that the gradations on the plastic tube may be viewed through the sheath. The ability to measure insertion depth increases the certainty that the tissue sample collected is from the correct area. After a tissue sample is collected from the proper area, while the tissue sampling device remains inserted, the sheath can be moved back along the distal end of the twisted wire to cover the brush bristles before removing the brush. This allows for the tissue sample to be protected on the brush within the sheath during removal.
Additionally, the gradations along the flexible tube allow the practitioner to measure the length of bristles exposed. As the practitioner pulls the sheath from its insertion position towards the handle, the further the sheath is pulled the more bristles are exposed. The gradations (ruler) provide a visual confirmation of this measurement and allow the practitioner to be precise in exposing only a certain length of the brush bristles. This measurement allows the practitioner to have better control of where the tissue is sampled and allows the practitioner to adjust the length of brush based on patient specific parameters; such as uterine size measured during previous tests or inferred based on patient history. Control of brush exposure increases sampling precision and patient comfort.
Simultaneously with withdrawal of the inner obturator back into the narrow cylindrical tube, the device creates a weak suction to collect the disrupted sample into the outer tube. The entire apparatus is then withdrawn from the uterus and the sample is collected by reversing the process outside the body.
Combining two or more biopsy methods into one device, eliminates pain, discomfort, and inconvenience, e.g., a second procedure to obtain an adequate and accurate specimen. The multiple methods of specimen collection, e.g., disruption by physical means, and suction, used together, allows a gentler application of the individual methods, e.g. a gentle disruption and gentle suction applied simultaneously can replace a vigorous disruption, e.g. D&C, and a powerful suction. The combination of multiple gentler methods in one device is safer and more effective than any method alone.
See (each of which is expressly incorporated here by reference in its entirety):
A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a narrow cylindrical tube with a guidewire and biopsy sampling device at the end, similar to a Cook Medical (Bloomington, Ind.) Tao Brush™ I.U.M.C. Endometrial Sampler, modified such that surrounding the cylindrical tube, a cervical stop is provided that limits insertion of the tube to a fixed distance past the external os of the uterus.
This feature may be combined with a suction device to draw a liquid sample in to the lumen of the narrow cylindrical tube, per U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,351,712, 8,920,336, 8,517,956, and 8,348,856.
The device is intended to collect tissue samples from the lining of the uterus (endometrium). The device has a brush at the distal end of the catheter. The brush is intended to gently sample the endometrium. The proximal end of the device has a handle for ease of physician handling. The device has a relatively rigid, outer sheath, that can be move along the length of the device (with respect to the handle), to cover or expose the brush at the distal end.
The device has a skirt stopper around the distal end of the outer sheath. The skirt is intended to locate the device in relation to the cervix, and may be fixed in position or manually slidable along the outer sheath (with a sufficiently tight fit to remain axially fixed in position after placement, such that when abutting the cervix, manipulation of the guidewire and the sheath will not reposition the skirt stopper). A series of axial markings are preferably provided to allow quantitative alignment of the skirt stopper along the sheath. The skirt stopper is preferably made of an elastomer with rounded edges, such as rubber, silicone, or plastic, having sufficient elasticity to provide the desired characteristics and avoid unintended traumatic injury.
The device is intended to be advanced into the patient with the brush covered by the outer sheath until the skirt encounters the cervix and can advance no further. After the skirt is stopped against the cervix, the brush is advanced past the end of the sheath by moving the guidewire with respect to the sheath, to expose the brush inside the uterus, to allow tissue sampling.
The device also has an O-ring secured to the main shaft of the catheter. The outer sheath and O-ring create a seal against each other, and create suction (vacuum) at the distal end of the catheter for securing tissue samples when the guidewire and brush are withdrawn into the sheath.
The device is removed from the patient with the brush covered by the outer sheath. An atraumatic bulb may be provided at the end of the brush, which can seal against the distal end of the sheath when the guidewire is withdrawn into the sheath. A stop may be provided to limit withdrawal of the guidewire into the sheath. For example, a toroidal or cylindrical member attached in fixed position inside the sheath may interfere with the O-ring, and thus limit retraction.
The device preferably sterile, and intended for single-use only.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a multiple sample biopsy device is provided, capable of obtaining and segregating a plurality of biopsy samples taken in a single session. In accordance with this embodiment, the biopsy instrument is placed at an anatomical orifice, such as a cervical os or anus. Advantageously, a protrusion provides a positional reference with respect to the outer portion of the orifice, similar to the aforementioned skirt. This protrusion may be part of the design, or an added element to achieve the desired depth-of-insertion reference function.
The biopsy device according to this embodiment provides a plurality of biopsy sampling tools, which may each be the same or different, e.g., an endocervical sampler, an endometrial sampler, a punch sampler, and an endometrial sampler with suction. Each tool is provided as a device inside a sheath, such as a 1.5-4 mm tube, which is operable by a guidewire to extend the tool sampling head beyond the end of the sheath, twist with respect to the sheath, and retract the tool sampling head back within the sheath.
In addition to providing control over advancing the biopsy tool with respect to the sheath, each sheath is controllable to be selectively inserted into the orifice, and advance into the organ with the biopsy tool retracted into the sheath, and to be removed from the organ with the biopsy tool retracted into the sheath.
In some cases, the sheath itself may be articulable or angularly guidable to direct the biopsy tool to a desired region. The articulable sheath may be a single axis, i.e., a curvature of the end of the sheath, typically as a result of a tension on a tensile element such as cable, guidewire or filament attached to the wall of the sheath. By controlling the angle of curvature, and the rotational angle of the sheath with respect to the organ, a reasonable range of control is provided.
Similarly, a punch, or snare, or encapsulating biopsy device may also be controlled by a tension, which may be a wire or polymer filament. Thus, the case of a single guidewire with a single degree of freedom (advance/retract) is a simplest case, and additional controls and degrees of freedom may be provided.
In some cases, “blind” sampling may be accomplished, for example within a short canal, or at a distal portion of the organ with respect to the orifice.
In other cases, e.g., within a lumen of a larger organ, some imaging guidance is preferred. Therefore, the device may be used with an endoscope, and/or include an endoscopic camera, such as a 1-3 mm endoscopic camera. Typically, such devices rely on fiber optics from the tip to the imager, for both illumination and imaging. However, according to one embodiment of the technology, the imager circuit and lens are present at the tip of the scope, which in turn is disposed proximate to the end of the biopsy sampling device, to provide direct and real-time imaging of the biopsy procedure.
For example, On Semiconductor provides various suitable devices, such as the MT9V115 1/13″ VGA, OV6922 1/18″ ¼ VGA imager, and OVM6946 1/18″ 400×400 imager, which may be included as part of a subminiature module that transmits the image as a data stream over an electrical interconnection (or wirelessly). The imager is typically provided with a field of view facing the biopsy tool, with a set of LEDs, or LED illuminated fibers, illuminating the field. While the camera is not required in all modes of operation, i.e., all sampling procedures, if provided, it may remain inserted into the orifice throughout the procedure. The camera may be present near the end of the sheath and advanced with the respective sheath of the biopsy tool into the organ during the procedure.
Advantageously, the video signal from the imager may be carried using the guidewire(s) which control the biopsy tool as electrical power and/or signal carriers. Note that the operating voltage is typically low, e.g., <3.3V, so a dangerous condition for the patient would not be present in case of electrical leakage. However, the power carrying members may be insulated to further reduce risk and enhance signal integrity. A wireless transmission may also be provided, for example to a nearby wireless receiver, avoiding the need for wired transmission. In that case, the device may have a self-contained battery, or receive operating power over a conductor which advantageously may include the guidewire. Since the preferred guidewire is multi-stranded, power and ground, and even signal, may be transmitted if the strands are mutually insulated. There is no compelling reason why a guidewire needs to be uninsulated, so this permits enhanced use of an existing structure, at low added cost and complexity.
The biopsy device according to this embodiment provides a barrel cartridge with the various biopsy tools in angularly displaced positions. One was to selectively activate certain tools is to provide the barrel with a single active position, in which the manipulator controlled by the user provides a common user interface with functional control over a single one of the plurality of biopsy tips, e.g., extension and retraction of the sheath, and extension, retraction and rotation of the guidewire. As discussed above, a function for articulation of the sheath by tension on another actuation filament may also be provided. The remaining biopsy tools in the barrel may remain restrained in their undeployed positions, e.g., clamped in position.
Because the barrel has a larger diameter than the sheath, the barrel is maintained outside of the orifice, and a mechanism for engaging and disengaging each respective biopsy tool is also outside the orifice, which, for example, may rotate into position to release one tool while locking the others in retracted position. Thus, a relatively large barrel, e.g., 8-20 mm, may be provided with 2-12 biopsy tools in reserve. The end of the barrel mechanism advantageously serves as the skirt, to limit insertion distance of the sheath into the organ, and provide a well-defined positional reference.
According to a one embodiment, each biopsy tool in the device is separate, with no changeover in control. Thus, for a biopsy device with four deployable biopsy tools, there are four separate concurrently available sheaths with respective guidewires extending from the cartridge. This permits a physician to select the appropriate biopsy tools for a respective procedure, from generic or custom designs. The unused tools remain outside of the organ, while an active tool is in use. In some cases, multiple tools may be advanced into the organ, for example where an endoscope is provided as one of the available tools, and not linked to a particular or single biopsy tool.
On the other hand, in a second embodiment, a mechanism may be provided to mechanically separately engage the sheath, guidewire, and articulation wire for each separate biopsy tool, with a single control system extending from the cartridge. For example, a multi-way clamp, bayonet socket, quick-release, or magnetic mechanism may be provided to individually engage the respective biopsy tool in the active position. The cartridge is typically round, and centered at the orifice during the procedure, so that the non-deployed biopsy devices are eccentric within the cartridge when not in use. As they are brought into the active position, such as by rotation of a lockout/clamp control, and centering, the controls for that respective biopsy tool are also connected and made active. The camera may also be attached to the active biopsy tool at this time. Alternately, the camera is inserted in advance of the biopsy tool, and is separately positioned from the biopsy tools.
In some cases, an electrical mechanism may be provided in the cartridge, for example to latch the mechanical controls, extend the sheath to a desire depth of insertion, rotate the brush, and retract the sheath and/or biopsy brush into the sheath. Typically, the extension of the biopsy brush and axial manipulation are user controlled, and not automated, though a completely automated biopsy is possible.
It is preferred that each biopsy tool have a mechanical limiter to control and constrain the movements within a predetermined range, wherein the predetermined range may differ for the various biopsy tools depending on their intended use of application. Advantageously, axial control limits are referenced to the exterior surface surrounding the orifice of insertion, and the end of the barrel, a ring or protrusion surrounding the barrel, used to maintain this position reference without slipping into the orifice.
For example, the endocervical brush will typically have the sheath extend 0-2 cm past the orifice, and an endometrial brush will typically have the sheath extend 2-10 cm past the cervix, into the uterus, and a brush biopsy tool will extend 1-3 cm beyond the end of the sheath. The endocervical and endometrial brushes may be provided with or without suction, which may be provided by mechanical action of a plunger as the guidewire controlling the brush is withdrawn into the sheath, or by a vacuum provided through the sheath from the cartridge or beyond.
A puncher or cup biopsy tool are typically used under visual observation with the video imager, and may be less mechanically constrained in this circumstance, since the user is presumed to have control over the device during use.
Therefore, the present design permits multiple biopsies to be taken in a single session, from different regions of the organ, and maintained segregated from each other. From a patient perspective, this is advantageous, because the sampling procedure is facilitated, and the combined time and economic burden will typically be less than if separate biopsy tools are employed. Further, compatibility with a single imager used for a plurality of biopsy procedures is also efficient. Finally, in the case of a cartridge that disconnects from a standard handle, the cartridge provides an efficient way to organize and label the samples from a single patient, and makes pathological examination of the various samples from the same patient and same organ more efficient. Finally, because each sample is accurately depth labelled with respect to the orifice, clinically important information is obtained, as compared to traditional biopsy tools which do not provide an accurate depth reference. It is noted that a memory card, such as a micro-SD card, may be associated with the cartridge, which includes video and/or manipulation history information for each biopsy tool, which is automatically recorded and maintained, and which may be readily passed to the pathologist or made part of the patient's record.
It is therefore an object to provide a tissue sampling device, comprising: a flexible sheath having at least a distal portion configured to maintain an internal vacuum; a skirt stopper configured to maintain the sheath at a fixed insertion depth through the cervix within the uterus; and a displaceable structure within the sheath, to form a coaxial structure; the displaceable structure having a first end extending from a proximal end of the sheath and second end configured to, in a first state, extend from a distal end of the sheath, and in a second state, to be retracted into the distal end of the sheath; the second end of the displaceable structure having a cellular sampling structure, preceded by a suction element; and the coaxial structure being configured such that a tension on the first end of the displaceable structure at the proximal end of the sheath results in a retraction of the displaceable structure from the first state to the second state, to generate the suction to cause a displacement of media external to the sheath into the sheath distal to the piston.
The displaceable structure may terminate at the second end in an atraumatic bulb.
The cellular sampling structure may comprise a brush.
The brush may comprise a plurality of bristles extending radially from the displaceable structure. The brush may have a cross section which tapers with respect distance from the second end. The brush may have a helical cross sectional profile.
The coaxial structure may be configured for insertion to a predetermined depth into the cervical os of a uterus of a human, to retrieve an endometrial biopsy sample, and to be withdrawn from the cervical os of the uterus.
The coaxial structure may be further configured to be: inserted into the cervical os with the displaceable structure in the second state to a predetermined depth; extended into the first state with the cellular sampling structure within the uterus; manipulated by a user by movement of the first end of the displaceable structure to dislodge cells within the uterus; retracted into the second state within the uterus, to cause the vacuum to withdraw a liquid sample surrounding the cellular sampling structure in to the distal end of the sheath; and retracted from the cervical os with the displaceable structure in the second state.
The displaceable structure may comprise a spirally twisted flexible guidewire.
The sheath may have an outer diameter of between 1 and 3 mm and a length between 20 and 50 cm.
It is also an object to provide a tissue sampling method, comprising: providing a coaxial structure, comprising a flexible sheath having at least a distal portion configured to maintain an internal vacuum, a skirt around the flexible sheath, configured to limit an insertion depth of the flexible sheath into a human cervix; and a displaceable structure within the sheath, to form a coaxial structure, the displaceable structure having a first end extending from a proximal end of the sheath and second end configured to, in a first state, extend from a distal end of the sheath, and in a second state, to be retracted into the distal end of the sheath, and the second end of the displaceable structure having a cellular sampling structure, preceded by a piston; and applying a tension on the first end of the displaceable structure at the proximal end of the sheath to case retraction of the displaceable structure from the first state to the second state, generating the vacuum.
The coaxial structure may be configured for insertion into the cervical os of uterus of a human to the predetermined insertion depth, to retrieve an endometrial biopsy sample, and to be withdrawn from the cervical os of the uterus.
The method may, further comprise: inserting the distal portion of the coaxial structure into the cervical os of a uterus, with the displaceable structure in the second state to the predetermined depth; extending the distal portion of the coaxial structure into the first state with the cellular sampling structure within the uterus; manipulating the first end of the displaceable structure to dislodge cells within the uterus; retracting the coaxial structure into the second state within the uterus, to cause the vacuum to withdraw a liquid sample surrounding the cellular sampling structure in to the distal end of the sheath; and retracting the distal portion of the coaxial structure from the cervical os with the displaceable structure in the second state.
The cellular sampling structure may comprise a brush having a plurality of radially extending bristles from the displaceable structure and terminating in an atraumatic bulb.
The displaceable structure may comprise a spirally twisted flexible guidewire, further comprising twisting the guidewire to rotate the cellular sampling structure.
It is a still further object to provide a flexible coaxial biopsy device, comprising: a tubular sheath having a wall configured to maintain an internal vacuum with respect to an exterior of the tubular sheath; a flanged element on an outer surface of the tubular sheath, configured to limit a depth of insertion of the tubular sheath into a cervix; a displaceable wire within the tubular sheath; and a cellular sampling device configured to disrupt a surface of a tissue, mounted on the displaceable structure distal to the element, configured to protrude from a distal end of the tubular sheath when the displaceable element is disposed in a first state, and to be contained within the distal end of the tubular sheath when the displaceable element is disposed in a second state.
The cellular sampling device may comprise a plurality of bristles extending outwards from the displaceable wire, terminating at the distal end in an atraumatic bulb.
The device may be configured for insertion into the cervical os of a uterus of a human to the predetermined depth, to retrieve an endometrial biopsy sample from inside the uterus, and to be withdrawn from the cervical os of the uterus after the endometrial biopsy sample is obtained.
The device may be further configured to be: inserted into the cervical os with the displaceable wire in the second state to the predetermined depth; extended into the first state with the cellular sampling device within the uterus; manipulated by movement of the first end of the displaceable wire to dislodge endometrial cells; retracted into the second state within the uterus, to draw the vacuum to withdraw a liquid sample surrounding the cellular sampling device in to the distal end of the tubular sheath; and retracted from the cervical os with the displaceable wire in the second state.
The device may further comprise an element that creates a negative pressure within the tubular sheath when the displaceable wire is withdrawn into the tubular sheath.
The biopsy brush described above may also be revised for use as an anal biopsy brush, and an endometrial biopsy brush and anal biopsy brush may be provided together as a kit, optionally alone with a vial of preservative solution (for a single brush), or a plurality of vials of preservative for a kit. The kit is preferably a sterile package, which may be double wrapped, containing the biopsy brush or bushes, a vial or vials of preservative, and optionally an acceptable lubricant for cytological sampling, and optionally a disposable sterile sheet or drape.
The anal biopsy brush differs from an intrauterine biopsy brush in that it will be shorter, since the working distance between the physician or caregiver and patient orifice is less. The, for intrauterine use, the sheath is typically 20-25 cm long, with a 4 cm long brush and 2 cm exposed guidewire, such that the wire is 26-31 cm long, past the end of the handle to which it is bound, with a skirt on the sheath about 4 cm from the distal end.
An anal biopsy brush sheath will typically be 8-12 cm long, with the skirt about 4 cm from the distal end. For example, an anal biopsy brush may have a sheath 8 cm long with the skirt located 4 cm from the distal end, having a guidewire 14-18 cm long for sampling in the rectum up to 6 cm past the end of the sheath.
A kit may therefore include a long intrauterine biopsy device having a sheath length of about 20 cm, a short anal biopsy device having a sheath length of about 8 cm, two vials of cytological preservative, a packet of water-based cytologically acceptable lubricant (e.g., Surgilube®, which preferably does not include carbomers), a sterile drape, and package insert labelling instructions (which may be imprinted on the packaging as appropriate). Any lubricant should be applied on the exterior of the sheath, between the skirt or flange and distal tip, with the brush in the retracted position, with care taken to avoid getting lubricant on the end of the sheath or brush.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention consists of an intrauterine biopsy device having an outer thin walled tube of approximately 2.25 mm outside diameter and 1.2 mm inside diameter; length is between 20-50 cm, e.g., 22 cm. This tube may be a clear, bendable but self-supporting plastic tube, made e.g., of nylon. The guidewire is preferably a twisted stainless steel wire of approximately 0.1-0.2 mm diameter, having sufficient mechanical properties to convey the forces for extension and retraction of the brush during use. At the distal end of the guidewire is a biopsy brush, shown in
An anal biopsy device may also be provided, having an outer thin walled tube of approximately 2.25 mm outside diameter and 1.2 mm inside diameter; length is between 8-12, e.g., 8 cm. This tube may be a clear, bendable but self-supporting plastic tube, made e.g., of nylon. The guidewire is preferably a twisted stainless steel wire of approximately 0.1-0.2 mm diameter, having sufficient mechanical properties to convey the forces for extension and retraction of the brush during use. At the distal end of the guidewire is a biopsy brush, shown in
The wire may be periodically marked, such as in 1 cm increments, so that the physician or biopsy device operator can estimate the brush insertion with respect to the proximal end of the sheath.
At one end, the one that enters the uterus or anus, the biopsy brush is formed. A tight fitting O-ring around the guidewire, shown in
In another embodiment, the O-ring may be disposed about 2.5 cm from the tip, with the brush extending about 1.5 cm from the tip, with 1 cm of bare wire between them.
As shown in
The biopsy device is use as follows:
The brush is retracted completely into the outer sheath.
The sheath is inserted, through the vagina, into the cervix, until the skirt stopper meets the external os of the cervix. The tip of the brush should be displaced from the fundus.
The outer sheath is pulled back until it stops, i.e., abuts the handle. The brush is then rotated by holding the sheath still and turning the handle. For example, the brush may be rotated in a clockwise manner until a reference mark on the handle indicates completion of a 360° turn, and then rotated counterclockwise until the reference mark on the handle indicates completion of a−360° turn. Alternately, the brush may be rotated in only one direction by completing 4 or 5 360° rotations. In some cases, the brush may be repositioned axially, though it should not be withdrawn into the sheath until the sampling is completed.
After sampling with the brush, the guidewire is pulled at the handle, until the sheath hits the stop (e.g., the edge of the handle), thereby suctioning fluid surrounding the tip into the sheath, and then withdrawing the brush into the sheath.
After withdrawal of the device from the vagina, the brush and fluids in the sheath are immersed in a cytology preservative, such as formalin, and the sample is washed from the brush into the preservative by moving the brush in and out of the sheath immersed in the fluid.
The invention may be used, for example, to sample the inside of the uterus to diagnose abnormalities. It can detect or exclude a cancer. It can obtain an adequate tissue sample to determine infertility causes.
The anal brush is similarly employed. Such a biopsy tool typically has a shorter sheath and guidewire than an endocervical brush biopsy tool, because of the easier anatomical access. For example, the sheath may be 10-15 cm long, and the brush may extend 2-6 cm beyond the end of the sheath. As with the endocervical brush biopsy tool described above, a skirt is preferably provided which prevents insertion of the sheath into the anus beyond the sheath, to provide a physical reference distance for insertion. In some cases, the skirt may be repositioned on the sheath, to permit the physician the ability to determine at what depth of insertion the sample should be acquired. Advantageously, the readjustment requires more force than would be available by applying an unconstrained compression of the sheath against the skirt stopper, so that the position is maintained during use, but the stiction force can be overcome when the biopsy tool is external to the body.
According to a second embodiment, a multiple sample biopsy device is provided, capable of obtaining and segregating a plurality of biopsy samples taken in a single session. This therefore requires a plurality of biopsy brushes or tools, and a plurality of sheaths in which the tools are extended and retracted.
As discussed above, a depth of insertion positional reference, such as a skirt stopper may be provided. However, where the multiple biopsy tool system has a mechanism maintained outside of the orifice, the diameter of the tool may be sufficiently large to act as the stopper without additional structures.
According to one design, each biopsy tools is separate, including a sheath and guidewire control. A set of biopsy tools are aggregated in an outer tube housing. The tube has a conical internal profile at the distal end, so that a single biopsy tool may be advanced past the end of the housing, into the orifice or canal from which a biopsy is to be taken. In some cases, endoscopic guidance of the biopsy is desired, and in that case, a second sheath which supports the endoscope and lighting may be advanced as well. He endoscope sheath may also inject saline for visualization, though in the case of a brush biopsy, this is disfavored, since the saline will wash away the dislodged cells, and reduce the positional accuracy of sampling. An inert gas, such as CO2 may also be injected through the sheath, in known manner.
For example, the biopsy brush may be provided in a 3 mm tube, with 6 separate brushes provided within a housing. A stop may be provided at the proximal end of each sheath within the housing, to prevent over-withdrawal. Markings may be provided on each sheath, to inform the physician about the depth of insertion. In some cases, the physician may intend gradated sampling at a series of depths in the orifice, and advantageously, each respective sheath may have a stopper which limits its depth of insertion, and provides the physician with haptic feedback when that depth is achieved. This stopper may be a simple O-ring or clamp, which is adjusted by the physician for each biopsy sampling tool, before the procedure. The guidewire for each sampling tool may also have depth limits. Of course, the retracted position with the biopsy tool fully withdrawn into the sheath represents one extreme, and a clamp or limit may be provided on the manipulation end to control how far the guidewire may be extended beyond the end of the sheath.
In this first design, each biopsy brush may be of known type, with the optional addition of the insertion and retraction limiters, and indeed, the housing for arranging a multiple biopsy sample session may itself may be provided independent of the biopsy brushes.
In general, the housing avoids the need for a separate skirt stopper, though the housing may terminate in a skirt stopper.
According to a second design of the multiple sample biopsy device, a single manipulator extends from a housing, which itself contains a plurality of biopsy tools.
As discussed above, a depth of insertion positional reference, such as a skirt stopper may be provided. However, where the multiple biopsy tool system has a mechanism maintained outside of the orifice, the diameter of the tool may be sufficiently large to act as the stopper without additional structures.
Thus, a selectively engageable coupling is provided between a single guidewire and the various tools. The coupling thus links the guidewire, that extends to a physician manipulation interface, such as a grasping element, a handle, or a pivotal mechanism, to the individual guidewire for each tool. Advantageously, the plurality of tools are provide in a rotating barrel, which serves as the housing. Each biopsy tool, when engaged with the manipulation guidewire, can be advanced with its respective sheath an insertion distance, and then the biopsy head advanced beyond the sheath, and twisted or otherwise manipulated to obtain a biopsy sample. The biopsy head is then withdrawn back into the sheath, the sheath with biopsy head covers then withdrawn back into the cartridge, and the barrel twisted so another biopsy tool may then be engaged.
Therefore, the coupling is a coaxial coupling, which separately links and controls the sheath and the guidewire within each respective sheath. For example, within the cartridge, the end of the sheath may terminate in a steel ring, which is magnetically permeable. Thus, a magnetic coupling can be used to connect and disconnect the sheaths. Further, the inactive biopsy tools may also be held in place by another magnet, which is typically an electromagnet, or a permanent magnet with an electromagnetic release. The guidewire may be selectively connected to the external manipulation guidewire with a spring-loaded clamp. As the barrel is turned, the spring loaded clamp releases, and re-engages as it reaches the next detent position with the next biopsy tool aligned with the spring clamp. Within the barrel, the guidewire from the biopsy tool extends beyond the proximal end of the respective sheath.
The barrel is typically at least as long as the desired depth of insertion of the sheath into the patient. Thus, if it is desired to have a 12 cm depth of insertion, the barrel mechanism may be 13-16 cm long.
As shown in
In
In some cases, the sheath itself may be articulable or angularly guidable to direct the biopsy tool to a desired region. The articulable sheath may be a single axis, i.e., a curvature of the end of the sheath, typically as a result of a tension on a tensile element such as cable, guidewire or filament attached to the wall of the sheath, not shown in in the figures . . . . By controlling the angle of curvature, and the rotational angle of the sheath with respect to the organ, a reasonable range of control is provided. Similarly, a punch, or snare, or encapsulating biopsy device may also be controlled by a tension, which may be a wire or polymer filament. Thus, the case of a single guidewire with a single degree of freedom (advance/retract) is a simplest case, and additional controls and degrees of freedom may be provided. The controls for these tools may also be selectively engaged through a mechanism, or provided individually to the user.
An endoscopic imager (not shown in the figures) may be provided, preferably as a feature of the housing, so that it may be used with various biopsy tools within the housing. For example, a 1-3 mm endoscopic camera with fiber optic lighting, may be provided, e.g., the On Semiconductor OVM6946 1/18″ 400×400 imager.
The present application is a non-provisional, and claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/432,278, filed Dec. 9, 2017, the entirety of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1835122 | Desire | May 1926 | A |
1719428 | William | May 1927 | A |
1967597 | Rudolf | Jul 1932 | A |
2360051 | Eweson | Jul 1941 | A |
2495794 | Weller | Dec 1946 | A |
2601513 | Gladstone | Dec 1948 | A |
2623521 | Shaw | Mar 1951 | A |
2701559 | Cooper | Aug 1951 | A |
2763104 | Lindenberg | Jul 1952 | A |
2739585 | Ernest | Jun 1953 | A |
2839049 | Maclean | Mar 1954 | A |
2955591 | Maclean | May 1954 | A |
2729210 | Spencer | Jun 1954 | A |
2767703 | Nieburgs | Jan 1955 | A |
2881756 | Crosby et al. | Feb 1958 | A |
3088454 | Shute | May 1963 | A |
3196876 | Miller | Jul 1965 | A |
3228398 | Leonard et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3308825 | Cruse | Mar 1967 | A |
3400708 | Scheidt | Sep 1968 | A |
3477423 | Griffith | Nov 1969 | A |
3561429 | Jewett et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3587560 | Glassman | Jun 1971 | A |
3613662 | Chrysostomides | Oct 1971 | A |
3626470 | Antonides et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3656472 | Ben Moura | Apr 1972 | A |
3776219 | Brown | Dec 1973 | A |
3777743 | Binard | Dec 1973 | A |
3815580 | Oster | Jun 1974 | A |
3838681 | Dalton | Oct 1974 | A |
3877464 | Vermes | Apr 1975 | A |
3881464 | Levene | May 1975 | A |
3913566 | Lacey | Oct 1975 | A |
3945372 | Milan et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3989033 | Halpern et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
3998216 | Hosono | Dec 1976 | A |
4016865 | Fredricks | Apr 1977 | A |
4023559 | Gaskell | May 1977 | A |
4027658 | Marshall | Jun 1977 | A |
4048998 | Nigro | Sep 1977 | A |
4054127 | Milan et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4059404 | Schuster et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4108162 | Chikashige et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4127113 | Nollan | Nov 1978 | A |
4136680 | Southworth | Jan 1979 | A |
4177797 | Baylis et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4227537 | Suciu et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4235244 | Abele et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4239040 | Hosoya et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4256119 | Gauthier | Mar 1981 | A |
4258722 | Sessions et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4262676 | Jamshidi | Apr 1981 | A |
4266555 | Jamshidi | May 1981 | A |
4318414 | Schuster et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4324262 | Hall | Apr 1982 | A |
4340066 | Shah | Jul 1982 | A |
4356822 | Winstead-Hall | Nov 1982 | A |
4356828 | Jamshidi | Nov 1982 | A |
4361948 | Omata | Dec 1982 | A |
4403617 | Tretinyak | Sep 1983 | A |
4448205 | Stenkvist | May 1984 | A |
4465072 | Taheri | Aug 1984 | A |
4485824 | Koll | Dec 1984 | A |
4517978 | Levin et al. | May 1985 | A |
4561433 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4562847 | Nydahl et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4600014 | Beraha | Jul 1986 | A |
4600214 | Spademan | Jul 1986 | A |
4605011 | Naslund | Aug 1986 | A |
4619272 | Zambelli | Oct 1986 | A |
4620548 | Hasselbrack | Nov 1986 | A |
4628941 | Kosasky | Dec 1986 | A |
4641663 | Juhn | Feb 1987 | A |
4662381 | Inaba | May 1987 | A |
4667684 | Leigh | May 1987 | A |
4699154 | Lindgren | Oct 1987 | A |
4700713 | Kist | Oct 1987 | A |
4726373 | Greengrass | Feb 1988 | A |
4735214 | Berman | Apr 1988 | A |
4747414 | Brossel | May 1988 | A |
4754764 | Bayne | Jul 1988 | A |
4759376 | Stormby | Jul 1988 | A |
4762133 | Bayne et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4763670 | Manzo | Aug 1988 | A |
4766907 | de Groot et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766908 | Clement | Aug 1988 | A |
4784158 | Okimoto | Nov 1988 | A |
4817631 | Schnepp-Pesch et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4873992 | Bayne | Oct 1989 | A |
4877037 | Ko et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4919146 | Rhinehart et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4966162 | Wang | Oct 1990 | A |
4981143 | Sakita et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986278 | Ravid et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
D316488 | Stormby | Apr 1991 | S |
D317361 | Stormby | Jun 1991 | S |
5022408 | Mohajer | Jun 1991 | A |
5084005 | Kachigian | Jan 1992 | A |
5131402 | Van Dooren | Jul 1992 | A |
5133361 | Cox et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5146928 | Esser | Sep 1992 | A |
5172701 | Leigh | Dec 1992 | A |
5176693 | Pannek, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184626 | Hicken | Feb 1993 | A |
5191899 | Strickland et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201323 | Vermeulen | Apr 1993 | A |
D335706 | Mohajer | May 1993 | S |
5217023 | Langdon | Jun 1993 | A |
5217024 | Dorsey et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5253652 | Fast | Oct 1993 | A |
5259391 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5279307 | Mohajer | Jan 1994 | A |
5348022 | Leigh et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357977 | Michels | Oct 1994 | A |
5370128 | Wainwright | Dec 1994 | A |
5370653 | Cragg | Dec 1994 | A |
5422273 | Garrison et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427115 | Rowland et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5445164 | Worthen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456265 | Yim | Oct 1995 | A |
5471994 | Guirguis | Dec 1995 | A |
5476104 | Sheahon | Dec 1995 | A |
5509921 | Karell | Apr 1996 | A |
5533517 | Michels | Jul 1996 | A |
5535756 | Parasher | Jul 1996 | A |
5546265 | Santos et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562102 | Taylor | Oct 1996 | A |
5578018 | Rowland et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5623941 | Hedberg et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5713368 | Leigh | Feb 1998 | A |
5713369 | Tao et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722423 | Lind et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738109 | Parasher | Apr 1998 | A |
5787891 | Sak | Aug 1998 | A |
5810745 | Chaffringeon | Sep 1998 | A |
5817032 | Williamson, IV et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823954 | Chaffringeon | Oct 1998 | A |
5865765 | Mohajer | Feb 1999 | A |
5899850 | Ouchi | May 1999 | A |
5900374 | Otto-Nagels | May 1999 | A |
5916175 | Bauer | Jun 1999 | A |
5931845 | Amyette | Aug 1999 | A |
5954670 | Baker | Sep 1999 | A |
6013036 | Caillouette | Jan 2000 | A |
6030397 | Monetti et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036658 | Leet et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059735 | Sgro | May 2000 | A |
6066102 | Townsend et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099539 | Howell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143512 | Markovic et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6187546 | ONeill et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193674 | Zwart | Feb 2001 | B1 |
D441141 | Shalita | Apr 2001 | S |
6258044 | Lonky et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277089 | Yoon | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6336905 | Colaianni | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346086 | Maksem et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352513 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387058 | Wallach | May 2002 | B1 |
6394966 | Gill et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409681 | Caillouette | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6494845 | Rutenberg | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500114 | Petitto et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514191 | Popowski et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6572578 | Blanchard | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6610005 | Tao | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612996 | Williams | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623440 | Weldon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638504 | Lukanidin | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6669643 | Dubinsky | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676609 | Rutenberg et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6723057 | Pearce | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749575 | Matriano et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D500410 | Dragan | Jan 2005 | S |
D500553 | George | Jan 2005 | S |
6926677 | Richards | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947788 | Gilboa et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7004913 | Rutenberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7087028 | Sak | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097629 | Blair | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108661 | Secrest et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7153700 | Pardee et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7156814 | Williamson, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7207951 | Lurie et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7214229 | Mitchell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226457 | Carson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D561333 | Zwart | Feb 2008 | S |
7419785 | Fuqua et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7429650 | Fuqua et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
D588695 | Kim | Mar 2009 | S |
7517323 | Ng | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7674283 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7741433 | Pollock et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749173 | Larkin | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767448 | Yong | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7938830 | Saadat et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7993863 | Zetter et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012427 | Bommarito et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8052613 | Assell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8142352 | Vivenzio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8152736 | Caillat et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152739 | McCully | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8157728 | Danna et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
D658388 | Persson | May 2012 | S |
8178317 | Roberts et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8221480 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251918 | Larkin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8256233 | Boyden et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273383 | Folkman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8282612 | Miller | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8292794 | Lubock et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8323211 | Larkin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8328710 | Lubock et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343733 | Gelvan et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348856 | Malanowska-Stega et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8361095 | Osborne | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366612 | Rosenthal | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376958 | Larkin | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8388523 | Vivenzio et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409376 | Boyden et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8414356 | Boyden et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8420885 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435175 | McMahon et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8439847 | Larkin | May 2013 | B2 |
8452068 | Averbuch et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460209 | Klein | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467589 | Averbuch et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473032 | Averbuch | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8485861 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517956 | Malanowska-Stega et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8518031 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
D691379 | Gunjian | Oct 2013 | S |
D691814 | Gonzalez-Gomez | Oct 2013 | S |
8579937 | Gresham | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8604172 | Sabbadini et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617144 | Ravikumar | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8652067 | Lonky et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
D701600 | Kauffman | Mar 2014 | S |
8672861 | Klein | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690767 | Kecman | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8697139 | Phillips | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8734364 | Mantzaris et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8754045 | Livingston | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762067 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8784384 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784385 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788211 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795197 | Lonky et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798932 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8798933 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801628 | Teschendorf | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821395 | McMahon et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8827923 | Vom et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849441 | Boyden et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858912 | Boyden et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8920336 | Malanowska-Stega et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8941057 | Subramaniam | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8968213 | Roush et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993347 | Reisacher | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005198 | Long et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9039637 | Keady | May 2015 | B2 |
9040087 | Boyden et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044213 | Lonky | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9050070 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050251 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050317 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9056047 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060926 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060931 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060934 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072688 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9072799 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9078642 | Vom et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9078786 | Miller | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9095330 | Leahy et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9113857 | Sethi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117258 | Averbuch | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9119604 | Gresham | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9119609 | OSullivan et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9173779 | Triva | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9271803 | Averbuch et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282950 | Klein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282951 | Lonky et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9320502 | OSullivan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9332898 | McMahon et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351712 | Malanowska-Stega et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9393394 | Lonky et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9532706 | McMahon et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9575140 | Zur | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636082 | Field | May 2017 | B2 |
9642591 | Field et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9655600 | Lee-Sepsick | May 2017 | B2 |
9659374 | Averbuch | May 2017 | B2 |
D790225 | Poletto | Jun 2017 | S |
9687642 | Lonky et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
D790863 | Poletto | Jul 2017 | S |
9707002 | Henkes et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9730840 | Miller | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9743904 | Field | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9750483 | Weldon et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9820722 | Malanowska-Stega et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9846151 | Magniette | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9861919 | Liddy et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9883792 | McMahon et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9895140 | Lonky | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9904248 | Mathuis et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20020032389 | Fournier | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020068881 | Kobren et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020161313 | Sak | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165467 | Rutenberg | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030036770 | Markman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040015300 | Ganguli et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040116827 | Fiberio | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040236247 | Rizvi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050159721 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283129 | Hammons et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060078882 | Zetter et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060105343 | Zetter et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142668 | Friva | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161076 | Gombrich et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060241514 | Davies | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070073186 | Decker et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088248 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092891 | Willey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092892 | Willey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092893 | Willey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070231814 | Boman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009764 | Davies | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045924 | Cox et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080154090 | Hashimshony | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188769 | Lu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100087845 | Spiro et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111837 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111846 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111847 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111848 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111849 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111850 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111854 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111855 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111938 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100112067 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100112068 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100113614 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100113615 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114348 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114547 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119557 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121466 | Boyden et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143243 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152651 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152880 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163576 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168900 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185174 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187728 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210968 | Lonky et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110011190 | Subramaniam | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110077466 | Rosenthal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082358 | Davies | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110150765 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151477 | Reisacher | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172557 | Lonky et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190659 | Long | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201890 | Rosenthal | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120101738 | Boyden et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109015 | Kotmel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109613 | Boyden et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120115134 | Zetter et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120122091 | Vom | May 2012 | A1 |
20120128783 | Boyden et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120289858 | Ouyang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130011332 | Boyden et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046316 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130158429 | Lee-Sepsick et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130267870 | Lonky | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140128773 | Lonky et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140200511 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140243705 | Lonky et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150088032 | Lee-Sepsick | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150119795 | Germain et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133779 | Yurek et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150157841 | Lonky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150185228 | Reisacher | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150272555 | Lonky | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160029960 | Toth et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160033482 | Jolley et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160103131 | Moses et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160159918 | Pillai et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160331357 | Czarnecki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1023632 | Jun 1973 | CA |
0363196 | Apr 1990 | EP |
2305959 | Mar 1976 | FR |
2159420 | May 1985 | GB |
2208603 | Jul 1987 | GB |
WO9116855 | May 1991 | WO |
WO9301749 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO9953841 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Feldman, Sarah, Ross S. Berkowitz, and Anna Na Tosteson. “Cost-effectiveness of strategies to evaluate postmenopausal bleeding.” Obstetrics and gynecology 81, No. 6 (1993): 968-975. |
Dijkhuizen, F. Paul HLJ, Ben WJ Mol, Hans AM Brolmann, and A. Peter M. Heintz. “The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis.” Cancer 89, No. 8 (2000): 1765-1772. |
Kohlberger, Petra D., Josefine Stani, Gerald Gitsch, Dirk G. Kieback, and Gerhard Breitenecker. “Comparative evaluation of seven cell collection devices for cervical smears.” Acta cytologica 43, No. 6 (1999): 1023-1026. |
Phillips, V., and W. G. McCluggage. “Results of a questionnaire regarding criteria for adequacy of endometrial biopsies.” Journal of clinical pathology 58, No. 4 (2005): 417-419. |
Huang, Gloria S., Juliana S. Gebb, Mark H. Einstein, Shohreh Shahabi, Akiva P. Novetsky, and Gary L. Goldberg. “Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors.” American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 196, No. 3 (2007): 243-e1. |
Tahir, M. M., M. A. Bigrigg, J. J. Browning, T. Brookes, and Phillip A. Smith. “A randomised controlled trial comparing transvaginal ultrasound, outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy with inpatient hysteroscopy and curettage.” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 106, No. 12 (1999): 1259-1264. |
Maim, Norzilawati M., Zaleha A. Mahdy, Shuhaila Ahmad, and Zainul Rashid M. Razi. “The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient endometrial sampling.” Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 47, No. 2 (2007): 132-136. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180161021 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62432278 | Dec 2016 | US |