This invention pertains to brush cutters for clearing shrubs and other vegetation from road shoulders, and more particularly it pertains to brush cutters that are mountable to road graders and snow-plow trucks.
The maintenance of roadways in the countryside and along wood lots require periodic cutting of alders, poplar trees and other fast growing shrubs along the road shoulders, to prevent vegetation from spreading onto the roadways. This work is done by various apparatus including brush cutters mounted on farm tractors and front-end loaders.
Examples of these brush cutters are disclosed in the following documents.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,123,462 issued on Jun. 23, 1992 to T. A. Davision. The brush cutter described in this document has a large cutting disc mounted on a frame that is supported to a front-end loader. The disc can be swung side-to-side in the front of the loader.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,311,464 issued to H. Neuerburg et al. on Nov. 6, 2001. This document discloses a series of disc-like cutters mounted inline on a bar. The bar is suspending at its middle to an arm mounted to the back of a tractor. The arm can be swung sideways to mow grass alongside the tractor.
CA Patent 510,271 issued to Earl W. Holmes on Feb. 22, 1955. The apparatus disclosed in this document comprises a sickle bar extending from an arm having a pivot at each end. The arm extends from a turntable on the frame of a truck. The sickle bar is movable to cut grass along the near slope and the far slope of a ditch.
CA Patent 914,430 issued to V. D. L. Cornelis on Nov. 14, 1972. This document discloses a pair of mower rotors mounted side-by-side on the three-point hitch of a farm tractor. The mower rotors are mounted offset from the line of travel of the tractor, such as to mow a strip of grass alongside the tractor.
CA Patent 1,004,858 issued to Pieter A. Oosterling et al. on Feb. 8, 1977. This document discloses a series of disc-like cutters mounted inline on a bar extending from the three-point hitch of a farm tractor. The bar-type cutter extends sideways from the tractor such as a conventional sickle bar type hay mower.
Although the apparatus of the prior art deserve undeniable merits, it is believed that a more convenient way for clearing brushes along road shoulders is to do it using a brush cutter mounted as a wing plow on a road grader or on a similar snow-plowing vehicle. Advantages of such mounting are numerous and include the fact that its operation is as easy as operating a wing plow.
In the present invention, there is provided a brush cutter mounted as a wing plow on a road grader, a snow plow truck or other snow-plowing vehicle.
Broadly, in one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a road vehicle having wing-plow attachments and a brush cutter mounted as a wing plow to the wing-plow attachments. The brush cutter has an elongated frame and a series of cutting discs mounted in line along that frame. The wing-plow attachments comprise a wing-plow mast having a first raisable connection and a wing-plow push bar having second raisable connection. The elongated frame is connected at both ends thereof to the first and second raisable connections respectively, such that both ends are independently adjustable in height by the wing-plow mast and the wing-plow push bar.
This mounting of the brush cutter is as agile as a wing plow to clear road shoulders. The brush cutter can be manipulated to leap over mail boxes, fence posts, large rocks, stumps and driveway markers, whether these obstacles are located at the near end or the far end hereof.
In another aspect of the present invention, the hydraulic valves used to operate the brush cutter are the same valves as those used to operate a wing plow and these valves are used in a same way as to operate a wing plow, such that the brush cutter is easily workable by snow-plow operators.
This brief summary has been provided so that the nature of the invention may be understood quickly. A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment thereof in connection with the attached drawings.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals denote like parts throughout the several views, and in which:
Referring back to
The brush cutter 20 is supported to the road grader 22 at two connection points. The connection point closer to the road grader 22 is referred to as the near end connection 40 and the other connection point is referred to as the far end connection 42. Similarly, the portion of the brush cutter closer to the road grader 22 is referred to as the near end 44 and the portion 20 farther away from the road grader is referred to as the far end 46.
Referring to
The near end connection 40 consists of a clevis 50, a plate 52, and a pin 54 passing through the clevis 50 and through the plate 52. Preferably, the plate 52 is mounted to a pivot 56 having a vertical axis of articulation, although this is not essential. The pivot 56 is mounted to a block that is movable inside the mast 48.
Referring back to
The articulation of the brush cutter 20 is limited to vertical displacement along the mast 48; a horizontal angular sweep as indicated by arrow 60 in
It will be appreciated that the expression “parallel to the ground” as used herein may also include a setting of each disc 26 where the leading edge thereof is slightly closer to the ground that the trailing edge, for providing a relief in the cut being made.
The movement of the brush cutter 20 about the pivot 56 is provided to set the brush cutter 22 at an angle from the direction of travel of the road grader 22 such that the path of each cutting disc 26 overlap each other slightly as illustrated by arrows 64 in
The far end connection 42 retaining the far end of the brush cutter 20 to the road grader 22 is better illustrated in
The push bar 70 on the road grader 22 is of the type being extensible by way of a first hydraulic cylinder 80 and raisable by way of a second hydraulic cylinder 82. The push bar 70 is of the type where actuation of both hydraulic cylinders 80, 82 are controlled by hydraulic valves in the wing-plow valve bank as mentioned before.
The push bar 70 on the road grader 22 preferably has a shock absorber 84 thereon to absorb shocks that might be encountered during the operation of the brush cutter 20.
The push bar 70 is mounted to the road grader in a way that is conventional for supporting a wing plow, and therefore no further explanation is deemed necessary relative to this element.
Referring particularly to
The first position of the brush cutter 20 shown at label 90 is a horizontal position where the cutting discs 26 are maintained parallel to a road surface. The second position 92 has the far end 46 of the brush cutter adjusted lower than the near end 44, for clearing a road shoulder that is sloping downward, below a horizontal alignment from the road surface for example. The third position 94 has the far end 46 raised higher than the near end 44 for use when the road grader 22 has one side riding into a ditch 20 for example. The fourth position 96 has both the near end 44 and the far end 46 raised relative to the road surface, for use when the road grader is riding with both sides thereof into a ditch for example. The fifth position 98 has the near end much higher than the far end, for leaping over a driveway marker for example. The position labeled as 100 is a stow away position with the brush cutter 20 raised in a near-vertical alignment.
Brush tends to be of highly uneven constitution and it is often the case that not all cutting discs use the same amount of power at the same time. For instance, a small tree is one example of something that requires a significant amount of power to cut through. If a small tree comes into contact with one of the cutting discs while the other cutting discs are only in contact with softer material, the specific disc the small tree is in contact with will require power to be cut by the cutting disc it is against, but the other cutting discs will likely not require as much power. Statistically, it can be highly unlikely that power above a given specified requirement be required at any given time. Henceforth, in this embodiment, a single motor 128 (hydraulic in this case) is used, the power of which is distributed amongst the cutting discs by a power transfer mechanism 130. It will now be understood that this arrangement can be significantly less costly than providing each one of the cutting discs with a specific motor offering the maximum power each individual cutting disc is expected to require at some point in time.
In this specific embodiment, the motor 128 is directly mounted on the shaft of one of the cutting discs and the power is distributed to the shafts of the other cutting discs by corresponding belt and sheave arrangements. More specifically, one belt and sheave arrangement including its tensioning pulley is used between each pair of adjacent cutting discs. Belt and sheave arrangements were used in this example rather than gearing or chain and sprocket arrangements given that they allowed satisfactory performance at a lower cost. Moreover, it will be noted that the motor 128 is mounted on the shaft of a central one of the cutting discs 122 in this embodiment, and therefore transfers power to cutting discs located on both sides. Henceforth, to reach the cutting discs 126, 118 located at each opposite end, the power is carried across a maximum of two belt and sheave arrangements. This configuration is believed to lead to a lesser likelihood of belt failures than an embodiment where the motor would be located at one end of the elongated frame and the power thereby travel across a greater number of belts, for instance.
In this example where 5 cutting discs are used, each having a 2 or 2¼″ kerf, triple sheave arrangements were found to offer satisfactory ruggedness and to be better than double sheave arrangements. It will be noted that a housing or cover, not shown in
The brush cutter 110 also has a brush deflector bar 132 mounted on the front side thereof to deflect small trees downward in the front of and under the brush cutter 110. In the specific example shown in
It will also be noted that in this specific embodiment, a pair of runners 138, 140 is provided with the frame. Each one of the runners 138, 140 is provided at a corresponding end 136, 134 of the frame 112, adjacent a corresponding one of the end cutting discs 118, 126. Both are made integral to the frame 112 and protrude downwardly from the plane of the cutting discs in a manner that if the frame 112 is lowered too close to the ground, one, or both of the runners 138, 140 will come into engaging contact with the ground rather than the cutting discs themselves.
Although an example embodiment of a brush cutter and its mounting have been illustrated on a road grader, those skilled in the art will understand that a same mounting can be done on a snow plow truck, a front end loader or another road vehicle having wing-plow attachments. Also, a sickle-bar type brush cutter or other brush mower may also be mounted to the wing-plow attachments in a similar way as described herein for providing similar results as those described herein. Finally, it will be noted that in light of the teachings above, a brush cutter can be adapted for other types of mountings, such as a central mounting on a tractor, for instance. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 61/714,880, filed Oct. 17, 2012, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61714880 | Oct 2012 | US |