The present invention relates in general to the field of microscopic manufacturing processes.
Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with microscopic metallic tubes.
Fabrication of open-ended metallic (amorphous and crystalline) micro- and nano-tubes has been challenging due to need of complex and expensive processing steps. The two main strategies in use are deposition-based approach for crystalline metals and hot-drawing approach for amorphous metals (metallic glasses). Both approaches require expensive sacrificial templates fabricated by lithographic techniques. The crystalline metals are deposited on templates using electroplating, chemical-vapor-deposition (CVD), or physical-vapor-deposition (PVD). Subsequently, the templates are dissolved to produce hollow metal structures. The major drawbacks are (i) use of expensive disposable templates, (ii) only limited compositions can be deposited, and (iii) special pre-plating procedures are required. While some of these limitations can be overcome by using hot-drawing of amorphous metals, the need for disposable templates cannot be avoided. Moreover, the amorphous metal hollow structures produced by hot-drawing are not through accessible, making them unsuitable for transport applications.
A method for manufacturing microscopic metallic (amorphous and crystalline) tubes using buckles as seed structures in pulling of metallic liquids is disclosed. The procedure enables fabrication of tubes with any combinations of porosity, length, wall thickness, and tapering angle. The structures themselves are self-standing, and the devices thus fabricated can be used as microneedles in drug delivery devices, heat exchangers in microelectronics, through channels in microfluidic devices, and electrodes in sensors.
In one embodiment, the process uses viscous buckles of controllable dimensions as seed structures in metallic liquids. Micro and nano-scale tubes are fabricated using inexpensive templates (made by drilling) by mechanically downsizing the tube opening during elongation. The procedure always forms self-standing tubes that are attachable to any substrate (a desirable feature in micro-devices) without requiring any post-processing procedures. The process removes the complex template-making and template-removal steps, which greatly reduces the production cost and time.
In another embodiment, a method for manufacturing a hollow metallic structure comprises: hot-pressing an amorphous metal into a cavity of a template until a buckle is formed, wherein a thickness of the amorphous metal is less than or equal to a diameter of the cavity; and forming the hollow metallic structure by pulling the amorphous metal away from the template.
In one aspect, the method further comprises providing a first plate, the template disposed on the first plate, and a second plate disposed above the template and substantially parallel to the first plate. In another aspect, the first plate comprises a first heating plate, the second plate comprises a second heating plate, and the amorphous metal is heated above a glass transition temperature of the amorphous metal using the first and second heating plates. In another aspect, the method further comprises depositing the amorphous metal on a top of the template over the cavity. In another aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the method further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the method further comprises attaching the metallic tube to a substrate. In another aspect, the method further comprises crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via a thickness of the amorphous metal, a diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
In another embodiment, a hollow metallic structure is manufactured by a process comprising: hot-pressing an amorphous metal into a cavity of a template until a buckle is formed, wherein a thickness of the amorphous metal is less than or equal to a diameter of the cavity; and forming the hollow metallic structure by pulling the amorphous metal away from the template.
In one aspect, the process further comprises providing a first plate, the template disposed on the first plate, and a second plate disposed above the template and substantially parallel to the first plate. In another aspect, the first plate comprises a first heating plate, the second plate comprises a second heating plate, and the amorphous metal is heated above a glass transition temperature of the amorphous metal using the first and second heating plates. In another aspect, the process further comprises depositing the amorphous metal on a top of the template over the cavity. In another aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the process further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the process further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the process further comprises attaching the metallic tube to a substrate. In another aspect, the process further comprises crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the process further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via the thickness of the amorphous metal, the diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the process further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
In another embodiment, a method for manufacturing a hollow metallic structure comprises: providing a first heating plate, a template disposed on the first heating plate, a second heating plate disposed above the template and substantially parallel to the first heating plate, and a cavity formed in a top of the template; depositing an amorphous metal on the top of the template over the cavity; hot-pressing the amorphous metal into the cavity of the template using the first heating plate and the second heating plate until a buckle is formed, wherein a thickness of the amorphous metal is less than or equal to a diameter of the cavity and the amorphous metal is heated above a glass transition temperature of the amorphous metal; and forming the hollow metallic structure by pulling the amorphous metal away from the template.
In one aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the method further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the method further comprises comprising crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via a thickness of the amorphous metal, a diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the invention along with the accompanying figures and in which:
While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the invention.
To facilitate the understanding of this invention, a number of terms are defined below. Terms defined herein have meanings as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the areas relevant to the present invention. Terms such as “a”, “an” and “the” are not intended to refer to only a singular entity, but include the general class of which a specific example may be used for illustration. The terminology herein is used to describe specific embodiments of the invention, but their usage does not limit the invention, except as outlined in the claims.
The supercooled liquid state of metallic glasses has been utilized in a wide range of thermoplastic forming operations such as, embossing [1-3], blow molding [4, 5], extrusion [6], rolling [7, 8], and drawing [9, 10]. Parallel-plate embossing has gained increasing attention due to its ability to produce nanoscale structures using a simple hardware [11, 12]. In embossing, a sheet of metallic glass is pressed onto a rigid template using two parallel plates heated above the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the metallic glass [1, 2, 13]. Above Tg, the metallic glass becomes a metastable supercooled liquid, which can fill the template features under pressure. Thermoplastic embossing of metallic glasses is typically carried out in air using standard compression testing machines equipped with heating provision [1, 2, 13]. The technique has been used to fabricate precise 3D microparts [1], controllable nanostructures [14], and hierarchically textured surfaces [9] from various metallic glass formers.
The filling of template cavities during embossing has been described by assuming Newtonian behavior of metallic glass supercooled liquids and creeping flow conditions [1, 15-18]. The earlier studies proposed a modified Hagen-Poiseuille equation1 to predict the template filling as a function of embossing parameters and supercooled liquid properties. Neglecting the capillary pressure and the oxidation related terms, the embossing pressure for a cylindrical cavity can be expressed as
where P is the embossing pressure at the entrance of the cavity, L is the filling length, D is the cavity diameter, η is the viscosity of supercooled liquid, and t is the embossing time. The pressure dependence on L (or L/D ratio) suggests that the viscous resistance at the cavity entrance was neglected (i.e. infinite supply of metallic glass was assumed), and only the flow resistance along the length of the cavity was considered. The equation yielded good agreement because the typical thicknesses (>500 μm) of metallic glass used in experiments is larger than the lithographic template features (D<100 μm). However, as demonstrated below, Eq. (1) does not accurately describe the template filling when the thickness of metallic glass becomes comparable or smaller than the cavity diameter.
More specifically,
A schematic of the cross-sectional view of thermoplastic embossing used in the present study is shown in
The viscosity of metallic glass supercooled liquids is of the order of 105-109 Pa·s [15]. Hence, the previous investigations have used Stokes flow equations to describe the disk flattening and cavity filling process during embossing [16, 27]. As explained in below in the supplementary information, a simple scaling analysis relating the viscous resistance contributions at the cavity entrance and applied pressure can be formulated as
where μ is the lateral flow resistance coefficient and was used as a fitting parameter to match the experimental results as shown in
where {tilde over (L)} is the non-dimensional reduced filling length (Eq. (8) in SI), and α is a non-dimensional parameter related to lateral flow resistance μ in Eq. (2). {tilde over (L)} is the L/D ratio obtained by solving Eq. 2 and normalized by the maximum L/D attainable for the given loading conditions. The maximum L/D is calculated from Eq. (1). Eq. (3) can be used for any thickness while Eq. (1) is the upper bound and valid one for thick samples.
Another interesting effect of thickness is the buckling of metallic glass supercooled liquid. As shown in
The embossing experiments always resulted in some amount of cavity filling prior to buckling. This can be envisioned as buckling of viscous metallic glass layer embedded between a rigid plate and viscous metallic glass column as schematically shown in
In summary, this disclosure demonstrates that the template-based thermoplastic embossing of metallic glasses is sensitive to their thickness. A general flow model for all thicknesses is developed whereas the earlier models are valid only for embossing of thick metallic glasses. Significant reduction in filling length is observed when the metallic glass thickness becomes comparable or smaller than the diameter of template cavities. In this regime, the supercooled liquid undergoes buckling due to mounting lateral flow resistance. The buckling wavelength can be predicted based on the existing theories for viscous buckling of multilayer systems. In addition, the thickness dependent buckling of metallic glass can be utilized in manufacturing of hollow metal structures.
An example of the fabrication procedure is schematically illustrated in
Metal microtubes are desirable as: microneedles in transdermal drug-delivery; heat exchangers in microelectronics; micro-combustion equipment; through channels in microfluidics; and electrodes in chemical and biochemical sensors. One such example related to transdermal drug-delivery and microfluidic application is shown in
Supplemental Information
Therefore, the previous investigations have utilized Stokes equations to describe the flow of metallic glass [16].
η2ν=P, v=0 (S1)
where ν and P are the velocity and pressure fields near the entrance of the cavity. The flow of the metallic glass under the applied load (F=βt) results in filling of the cavity (flow in direction 1) and thinning of the metallic glass disk (flow in direction 2).
Filling of Cavity:
Along the depth of the cavity, the Stokes equation (Equation 1) yields
where νp is the maximum velocity of the metallic glass front, D is the cavity diameter, ΔP1 is the pressure difference between entrance of the pore and atmospheric pressure along direction 1, L is the instantaneous filling length.
Thinning of Disk:
Equation 1 yields
where νD is the maximum velocity of the metallic glass front along the disk direction, H is the instantaneous thickness of the metallic glass disk, and μ is the lateral flow resistance coefficient and was used as a fitting parameter to match the experimental results. Consider P as the total applied pressure during the thermoplastic forming process. νD can be expressed in terms of νp by imposing volume conversation constraint. Equation 2 and Equation 3 yields
Here νP=dL/dt
Integrating on both sides
where
is the dimensionless total applied pressure at the end of the embossing. Rearranging and expressing the above equation as a quadratic in L/D yields
Considering α′=Πμ/16, and solving for L/D yields
Dividing throughout by
implies
where
is the reduced filling length, and
is the reduced flow resistance term. Here,
As per Eq. (1), the term on the right gives normalized filling length (L/D)maximum. This (L/D)maximum represents maximum filling length for the given loading conditions. The lateral flow resistance coefficient μ was used as a fitting parameter to match the experimental results and the corresponding
In one aspect, the method further comprises providing a first plate, the template disposed on the first plate, and a second plate disposed above the template and substantially parallel to the first plate. In another aspect, the first plate comprises a first heating plate, the second plate comprises a second heating plate, and the amorphous metal is heated above a glass transition temperature of the amorphous metal using the first and second heating plates. In another aspect, the method further comprises depositing the amorphous metal on a top of the template over the cavity. In another aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the method further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the method further comprises attaching the metallic tube to a substrate. In another aspect, the method further comprises crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via a thickness of the amorphous metal, a diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
In one aspect, the process further comprises providing a first plate, the template disposed on the first plate, and a second plate disposed above the template and substantially parallel to the first plate. In another aspect, the first plate comprises a first heating plate, the second plate comprises a second heating plate, and the amorphous metal is heated above a glass transition temperature of the amorphous metal using the first and second heating plates. In another aspect, the process further comprises depositing the amorphous metal on a top of the template over the cavity. In another aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the process further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the process further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the process further comprises attaching the metallic tube to a substrate. In another aspect, the process further comprises crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the process further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via the thickness of the amorphous metal, the diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the process further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
In one aspect, the hollow metallic structure is self-standing. In another aspect, the method further comprises forming a metallic tube by cooling and fracturing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises using the metallic tube as a needle, and heat exchanger, a through channel or an electrode. In another aspect, the method further comprises comprising crystallizing the hollow metallic structure. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a lateral dimension of the buckle via a thickness of the amorphous metal, a diameter of the cavity and a temperature. In another aspect, the method further comprises controlling a porosity, a length, a wall thickness and a tapering angle of the hollow metallic structure using one or more parameters comprising a time-varying load, a filling length, the diameter of the cavity, the thickness of the amorphous metal, a pressure or a temperature. In another aspect, the cavity comprises two or more cavities and the hollow metallic structure is formed from each cavity. In another aspect, the two or more cavities are arranged in a pattern or an array.
It is contemplated that any embodiment discussed in this specification can be implemented with respect to any method, kit, reagent, or composition of the invention, and vice versa. Furthermore, compositions of the invention can be used to achieve methods of the invention.
It will be understood that particular embodiments described herein are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principal features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the claims.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.” The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.
As used in this specification and claim(s), the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. In embodiments of any of the compositions and methods provided herein, “comprising” may be replaced with “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of”. As used herein, the phrase “consisting essentially of” requires the specified integer(s) or steps as well as those that do not materially affect the character or function of the claimed invention. As used herein, the term “consisting” is used to indicate the presence of the recited integer (e.g., a feature, an element, a characteristic, a property, a method/process step or a limitation) or group of integers (e.g., feature(s), element(s), characteristic(s), property(ies), method/process steps or limitation(s)) only.
The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.
As used herein, words of approximation such as, without limitation, “about”, “substantial” or “substantially” refers to a condition that when so modified is understood to not necessarily be absolute or perfect but would be considered close enough to those of ordinary skill in the art to warrant designating the condition as being present. The extent to which the description may vary will depend on how great a change can be instituted and still have one of ordinary skill in the art recognize the modified feature as still having the required characteristics and capabilities of the unmodified feature. In general, but subject to the preceding discussion, a numerical value herein that is modified by a word of approximation such as “about” may vary from the stated value by at least ±1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 or 15%.
All of the compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
To aid the Patent Office, and any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, applicants wish to note that they do not intend any of the appended claims to invoke paragraph 6 of 35 U.S.C. § 112, U.S.C. § 112 paragraph (f), or equivalent, as it exists on the date of filing hereof unless the words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim.
For each of the claims, each dependent claim can depend both from the independent claim and from each of the prior dependent claims for each and every claim so long as the prior claim provides a proper antecedent basis for a claim term or element.
1. G. Kumar, H. X. Tang, and J. Schroers, Nature 457, 868 (2009).
2. M. Hasan, J. Schroers, and G. Kumar, Nano Lett. 15, 963 (2015).
3. T. Xia, N. Li, Y. Wu, and L. Liu Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 081601 (2012).
4. B. Sarac, G. Kumar, T. Hodges, S. Ding, A. Desai, and J. Schroers J. Microelectromech. Syst. 20, 28 (2011).
5. J. Schroers, Q. Pham, A. Peker, N. Paton, and R. V. Curtis Scr. Mater. 57, 341 (2007).
6. Y. Kawamura, T. Shibata, A. Inoue, and T. Masumoto Acta Mater. 46, 253 (1998).
7. R. Martinez, G. Kumar, and J. Schroers, Scr. Mater. 59, 187 (2008).
8. X. Xiao, S. S. Fang, Q. Wang, G. M. Wang, Q. Hua, and Y. D. Dong Mater. Lett. 58, 2357 (2004).
9. M. Hasan, and G. Kumar, Nanoscale 9, 3261 (2017).
10. Z. Hu, C. S. Meduri, J. Blawzdziewicz, and G. Kumar, Nanotechnology 30, 075302 (2018).
11. R. Li, Z. Chen, A. Datye, G. H. Simon, J. Ketkaew, E. Kinser, Z. Liu, C. Zhou, O. E. Dagdeviren, S. Sohn, J. P. Singer, C. O. Osuji, J. Schroers, and U. D. Schwarz, Comms. Phys. 1, 75 (2018).
12. X. Zhang, Y. Luo, J. Li, B. Dun, S. He, S. Yan, and Q. Li, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 117, 11 (2017).
13. Z. Hu, S. Gorumlu, B. Aksak, and G. Kumar, Scr. Mater. 108, 15 (2015).
14. C. Uzun, C. Meduri, N. Kahler, L. G. de Peralta, J. M. McCollum, M. Pantoya, G. Kumar, and A. A. Bernussi, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 015102 (2019).
15. Y. Kawamura, T. Nakamura, H. Kato, H. Mano, and A. Inoue Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304, 674 (2001).
16. G. Kumar, J. Blawzdziewicz, and J. Schroers, Nanotechnology 24, 2013.
17. J. Lu, G. Ravichandran, and W.L. Johnson, Acta Mater. 51, 3429 (2003).
18. A. Reger-Leonhard, M. Heilmaier, and J. Eckert, Scr. Mater. 43, 459 (2000).
19. C. H. Lin, and R. S. Chen, J. Micromech. Microeng. 17, 1220 (2007).
20. H. D. Rowland, A. C. Sun, P. R. Schunk, and W. P. King, J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 2414 (2005).
21. Y. Xu, F. Tsumori, T. Toyooka, H. Kotera, and H. Miura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 06GK11 (2011).
22. M. Ghidelli, H. Idrissi, S. Gravier, J. J. Blandin, J. P. Raskin, D. Schryvers, and T. Pardoen, Acta Mater. 131, 246 (2017).
23. C. W. Wang, P. Yiu, J. P. Chu, C. H. Shek, and C. H. Hsueh, J. Mater. Sci. 50, 2085 (2015).
24. Y. Liu, J. Padmanabhan, B. Cheung, J. Liu, Z. Chen, B. E. Scanley, D. Wesolowski, M. Pressley, C. C. Broadbridge, S. Altman, and U. D. Schwarz, Sci. Rep. 6, 26950 (2016).
25. D. C. Hyun, G. D. Moon, C. J. Park, B. S. Kim, Y. Xia, and U. Jeong, Adv. Mater. 22, 2642 (2010).
26. P. J. Yoo, K. Y. Suh, S. Y. Park, and H. H. Lee Adv. Mater. 14, 1383 (2002).
27. N. Li, W. Chen, and L. Liu, JOM 68, 1246 (2016).
28. M. A. Biot, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 242, 444 (1957).
29. M. A. Biot, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 72, 1595 (1961).
30. M. A. Biot, H. Ode, and W. L. Roever, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 72, 1621 (1961).
31. J. H. Fink, and R. C. Fletcher, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 4, 151 (1978).
32. A. Schweikart, A. Horn, A. Böker, and A. Fery, Complex Macromolecular Systems I, 75 (2009).
33. H. Ramberg, AAPG Bull. 47, 484 (1963).
34. Z. L. Xiang, J. Q. Liu, and C. Lee, Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2 (2016)
35. H. J. Gardeniers, R. Luttge, E. J. Berenschot, M. J. De Boer, S. Y. Yeshurun, M. Hefetz, R. van't Oever, and A. van den Berg, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 12, 855 (2003).
36. D. J. Thurmer, C. Deneke, Y. Mei, and O. G. Schmidt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 223507 (2006).
37. T. Kipp, H. Welsch, C. Strelow, C. Heyn, and D. Heitmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 077403 (2006).
This application claims priority to and is a PCT patent application of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/820,216 filed on Mar. 18, 2019 and entitled “Buckling-Assisted Manufacturing of Microscopic Metallic Tubes and Related Devices”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under CMMI-1663568 and CMMI-1653938 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/023455 | 3/18/2020 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62820216 | Mar 2019 | US |