1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to a circuit breaker lock out/tag out (“LOTO”) device that is mounted to a circuit panel.
2. Description of the Related Art
For many years, safety concerns for operator and maintenance personnel servicing equipment in an industrial setting have been at the forefront of the particular industry and federal and state lawmaking bodies. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has implemented regulations that require employers to safeguard personnel by locking out and tagging out electrical circuit breakers to prevent energization of equipment while it is being serviced. This procedure, when practiced, can prevent serious injury or death to personnel in the vicinity of the particular equipment.
Prior art mechanical devices have been created to prevent movement of the toggle type switch or handle of a modern electrical circuit breaker in the open (off) or closed (on) position. The devices are in the form of clamshells, pins, or some type of moderately hard material that is shaped or designed to mechanically block the toggle from moving. These devices, when attached or put in position can then be stabilized with the use of a locking device, such as, a standard padlock, only permitting movement of the toggle when the padlock is removed and the installation or positioning steps are reversed. The prior art devices have serious drawbacks in that the devices enable locking a circuit breaker in a closed position, and the devices are not integral to the breaker box.
Circuit breakers are designed to move or “trip” to the open position when an electrical current reaches a determined potential. Most standard breakers will “trip” even though the handle may be secured by a prior art device and the circuit protection will be enabled. While locking a circuit breaker in a closed position may be needed in some situations such as preventing vandals from flipping a breaker, this is not useful in an industrial setting. A machine may be damaged or personnel may be seriously injured if an operator is not able to de-energize the machine or sub-system at will.
The prior art devices are also not integral to the breaker panel, existing as discrete devices. These devices are usually kept in a central location in a facility that maintenance personnel will have to retrieve when needed. Production quotas and schedules may prevent the personnel from retrieving the device if a minor repair or alteration needs to be performed. These devices may also be misplaced after use, which will add to the down time of the machine if the employee has to search for the device. Some of these devices are difficult to install and require special training to use.
The lock out/tag out procedure has been in existence longer than the OSHA regulation and is a common-sense approach to servicing a machine. Maintenance workers may have good intentions and are often required to disable the energy source to the particular piece of equipment or subsystem that they intend to repair or alter. Production quotas or managerial pressures may force these workers to forego this basic safety step in order to get the machine back “on-line” if the LOTO device is not convenient.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for a lock out/tag out device that is simple to use, cannot lock a breaker in the closed or “on” position, and is built in to the breaker panel for convenient use.
The present invention generally relates to a lock out device for a circuit breaker mounted in a circuit breaker box, the circuit breaker having an operating handle to allow an operator to move the breaker between an open and closed position. The lock out device has at least one swivel plate rotatably coupled to the breaker box and movable between a first position that permits locking the operating handle in the open position, and a second position that allows movement of the operating handle to a closed position, wherein the at least one swivel plate rotates about an axis that is substantially orthogonal to the movement of the operating handle.
In another embodiment, a lock out device is described for a plurality of circuit breakers mounted in a circuit breaker box, each circuit breaker having an operating handle movable between an open and closed position. The lock out device comprising an enclosure having a plurality of shelves, and a plurality of swivel plates mounted to the enclosure and movable between a first position that permits locking the operating handle in the open position and a second position that allows movement of the operating handle to a closed position.
In another embodiment, a lock out device for a circuit breaker mounted in a circuit breaker box is described, the circuit breaker having an operating handle movable between an open and closed position. The lock out device comprises an engaging means to prevent movement of the operating handle to the closed position, a means for supporting the engaging means, said means to support coupled to the breaker box, and a means for securing the engaging means to prevent movement of the engaging means, wherein the means for securing is coupled to the means for supporting.
In another embodiment, a method for servicing an electrically actuated machine or component is described, wherein the electrical actuation is controlled at least partially by a circuit breaker mounted on a breaker panel. The method includes the steps of providing the circuit breaker having a movable handle in a closed position, moving the handle to an open position, positioning a swivel plate coupled to the breaker panel to maintain the handle in the open position, positioning a restriction member in a perforation adjacent the swivel plate to maintain the position of the swivel plate, and servicing the machine or component.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
The present invention discloses a built-in lock out device configured for connection to a standard breaker panel with minimal installation. The circuit breakers as described herein are standard circuit breakers known in the art and industry, but may be any apparatus having an integral exposed member capable of movement in at least two positions-one of the positions may close an electrical circuit and the other position may open the electrical circuit. Examples include switches and toggles. The breaker locking mechanism is integral to the device, and cannot be lost or misplaced. The lock out device is also capable of not allowing a standard circuit breaker to be locked “on”, thereby preventing possible fire hazards, machine damage, or injury to personnel.
A frame 150 of the lock out device 110 is coupled to the breaker box 100. The frame 150 has an opening or cavity 115 that is adapted to provide clearance for the breakers 105 and allow free movement of the protruding handles 107. Each of the handles 107 is configured to provide one of two positions to the user. The handles 107 seen in
The lock out device 110 may be attached to the breaker box 100 by experienced service personnel using appropriate fasteners such as, self drilling, self tapping screws 120 in the frame 150 of the lock out device 110. The frame 150 is adapted to fit into the recess 140 and to allow free movement for the handles 107.
In reference to
To prevent movement of the swivel plate 170, a restriction member is inserted into one of the perforations 180 adjacent the swivel plate 170. In one embodiment, the restriction member is a shackle 190 of a locking device 160. The shackle 190 is placed into one of the perforations 180 formed through the shelf 179, thereby preventing pivoting of the swivel plate 170 away from the handle 107. Once the padlock 160 is in a locked position, service personnel can be assured that the breaker 105 will remain in an open position 210 until the padlock 160 is removed, and maintenance may commence. In another embodiment, the restriction member may be a lockout hasp that is known in the art. In another embodiment, the restriction member is a cable from a locking device known in the art to lock a plurality of breakers 105. The cable is a size and material that prevents lateral movement of the swivel plate 170, and is of sufficient length to be threaded through at least one of the perforations 180. The cable itself is then locked to prevent removal of the cable from the perforation 180, thereby preventing movement of the swivel plates 170 and the respective protruding handles 107.
The construction of the swivel plate 170 prevents securing the handle 107 when it is in a closed position 220 due to the absence of an opening 172 adapted to secure the handle 107 in the closed position, thereby preventing locking a breaker 105 in an “on” position 220. This results in increased safety to any corresponding equipment or personnel by allowing an operator or bystander to open the circuit at will if a problem develops and the machine should be de-energized. The adjacent perforations 180 are in a spaced apart relation to the protruding handles 107, thereby allowing free movement to the handle 107. When the swivel plate 170 is not in use and the breakers 105 are in the closed or “on” position, the plate 170 may be positioned so as not to interfere with the handles 107 and secured by a restriction member as discussed above. This results in unfettered operation of the breakers 105 while providing convenient storage for the restriction members, such as the shackles 190 of the padlocks 160.
In one embodiment shown in
In another embodiment (not shown), a swivel plate 170 may be rotatably coupled to the face of the breaker box 100 adjacent a standard circuit breaker 105 without the need for a protrusion 152, 162 or a shelf 179. The face of the breaker box 100 may be suitably formed to allow the swivel plate 170 to rotate about an axis that is substantially orthogonal to the movement of the protruding handle 107 of the circuit breaker 105, thereby allowing the opening 172 of the swivel plate 170 to pivot and engage the handle 107 in the open position when used. The swivel plate 170 could then be secured by a restriction member holding means that could be formed integrally with, or coupled to the breaker box 100 face adjacent the swivel plate, thereby providing means to prevent further movement of the swivel plate 170 and providing a storage location for the restriction member.
In another embodiment (not shown), a swivel plate 170 may be rotatably coupled to the face of the breaker box 100 adjacent a standard circuit breaker 105 above or below (or to either side in the case of a horizontally mounted circuit breaker) the protruding handle 107, thereby allowing the swivel plate 170 to pivot in a substantially parallel relation to the movement of the protruding handle 107. The swivel plate 170 could then be secured by a restriction member holding means that could be formed integrally with, or coupled to the breaker box 100 face adjacent the swivel plate, thereby providing means to prevent further movement of the swivel plate 170 and providing a storage location for the restriction member.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/637,899, filed Dec. 21, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4174472 | Josemans | Nov 1979 | A |
4591816 | Mikulecky et al. | May 1986 | A |
5122624 | Benda | Jun 1992 | A |
5270503 | Frye | Dec 1993 | A |
5453724 | Seymour et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5502286 | Pollman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5631798 | Seymour et al. | May 1997 | A |
5655648 | Rosen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5772007 | Frye | Jun 1998 | A |
5821487 | Groves et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5936535 | Rosen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960941 | Castonguay et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5981888 | Robarge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015956 | Green | Jan 2000 | A |
6054661 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6266231 | Donahue et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6403902 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6501628 | Namba et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6563063 | Moore | May 2003 | B1 |
6927349 | Flegel et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7005590 | Willis | Feb 2006 | B1 |
20040159530 | Benda | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060151306 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60637899 | Dec 2004 | US |