BUILDING CHILLER/HEAT PUMP SYSTEM CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION BY SHIFTING TEMPERATURE SETPOINT

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20250075933
  • Publication Number
    20250075933
  • Date Filed
    August 28, 2024
    6 months ago
  • Date Published
    March 06, 2025
    6 days ago
  • CPC
    • F24F11/80
    • F24F11/46
    • F24F11/63
  • International Classifications
    • F24F11/80
    • F24F11/46
    • F24F11/63
Abstract
A building chiller/heat pump system includes a chiller/heat pump system for supplying a conditioned fluid to change a temperature of air being delivered into a building. The chiller/heat pump system is provided with a control to achieve a desired setpoint of the air delivered into the building. The control is programmed to receive a prediction of expected remission levels in energy that will be delivered to power the chiller/heat pump system. The control is programmed to change the setpoint such that an energy level required to operate the chiller/heat pump system to achieve the setpoint will drop when the expected emissions level increases, and adjusts the setpoint in an opposed direction when the expected emissions drops. A method is also disclosed.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This application relates to a method and control which is operable to change a building chiller/heat pump system temperature setpoint based upon the relative “dirty/clean” nature of available electricity. Dirty or clean refers to the emissions associated to the production of such electricity, including the levels of carbon dioxide release or other contaminants.


Most modern buildings are provided with a chiller/heat pump system. The chiller/heat pump system is operable to cool environmental air in hot times and provide heat during colder times. One such system is a so-called chiller or heat pump. In a chiller/heat pump system, water is either heated or cooled by a refrigerant cycle, and supplied through radiators to heat or cool the air in a building.


Currently, carbon emissions from buildings accounts for approximately 33% of world annual carbon emissions. In a typical commercial building, the chiller/heat pump system accounts for 30-50% of that total.


New built buildings can be provided with more energy efficient chiller/heat pump systems. However, it would be unduly expensive to modify existing chiller/heat pump systems in a similar manner.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a featured embodiment, a building chiller/heat pump system includes one or multiple chillers/heat pumps for supplying a conditioned fluid to change a temperature of air being delivered into a building. The chiller/heat pump system is provided with a control to achieve the desired setpoint of the air delivered into the building. The control is programmed to receive a prediction of power grid electricity expected to be generated and the emission levels embedded in that electricity that will be delivered to power the chiller/heat pump system. The control is programmed to change the water temperature setpoint such that an energy level required to operate the chiller/heat pump system to achieve this setpoint will drop when the expected emissions level increases, and adjusts this setpoint in an opposed direction when the expected emissions drops, while the level of temperature comfort in the conditioned building or zone is maintained within a predefined margin.


In another embodiment according to the previous embodiment, when the available energy is relatively dirty, and the chiller/heat pump system is operating in a cooling mode, the water temperature setpoint is increased for a period of time, and if the chiller/heat pump is operating in a heating mode, the setpoint is decreased for a period of time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, when the water temperature water temperature setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the prediction is a prediction of quantity of emissions per a unit of energy.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the chiller/heat pump system is one or multiple water chiller or heat pump plant system, and the controls change a temperature of the water leaving the chiller or heat pump to achieve a desired temperature within the building.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the change in the water temperature setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, when the water temperature setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the prediction is a prediction of quantum of emissions utilized by the system to deliver acceptable levels of comfort.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the chiller/heat pump system is a water chiller, and the control changes a temperature of the water to achieve the desired setpoint of air delivered into the building.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the change in the water temperature setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.


In another featured embodiment, a method of operating a chiller/heat pump system supplies a conditioned fluid to change a temperature of air being delivered into the building. The chiller/heat pump system is provided with a control to achieve a desired setpoint of the air delivered into the building. The control receives a prediction of expected emissions levels in energy that will be delivered to power the chiller/heat pump system. The control changes the water temperature setpoint such that an energy level required to operate the chiller/heat pump system to achieve the setpoint will drop when the emissions level increases, and adjusts the setpoint in an opposed direction when the expected emissions level drops.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, when available energy is dirty, and the chiller/heat pump system is operating in a cooling mode, the water temperature setpoint is increased for a period of time, and if the chiller/heat pump is operating in a heating mode, the setpoint is decreased for a period of time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, when the water temperature setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the prediction is a prediction of quantum of emissions per a unit of energy.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the chiller/heat pump system is a water chiller, and the control changing a temperature of the water to achieve a desired temperature of air delivered into the building.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the change in the water temperature setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, when the water temperature setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the prediction is a prediction of quantum of emissions per a unit of energy.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the chiller/heat pump system is a water chiller, and the control changes a temperature of the water to achieve the desired temperature delivered into the building.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the change in the water temperature setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.


The various features and advantages of at least one disclosed example embodiment will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 schematically shows a chiller/heat pump system.



FIG. 2 shows a projection of a marginal operating emissions rate.



FIG. 3A shows a disclosed control using an energy projection rate.



FIG. 3B is similar to FIG. 3A but shows a similar condition when the chiller/heat pump system is operating in a heating mode.



FIG. 3C shows yet another condition during a cooling mode.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart according to this disclosure.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a model predictive control.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 schematically shows a building chiller/heat pump system 20. A building 21 is shown schematically receiving system 20. Of course, as known, much of system 20 may actually be outside the building 21. System 20 has a heat exchanger 22 through which water passes to exchange heat with air at 24 to be delivered into the building 21. In a disclosed embodiment the chiller/heat pump system 20 is a water chiller, and water is a working fluid in the heat exchanger 22.


If the chiller/heat pump system 20 is operating in a cooling mode, the water passing through heat exchanger 22 is relative cool and it cools the air delivered at 24 into the building 21. Alternatively, during heating operation the water delivered into the heat exchanger 22 is relatively hot. The detail of the water chiller and its operation in heating and cooling modes may be as known and forms no portion of this disclosure.


A second heat exchanger 26 is associated with a refrigerant system 27 to either heat or cool the water prior to being delivered to exchange heat with the air at element 24. The refrigerant system 27 includes a compressor 28, the heat exchanger 26, an expansion device 30 and a second heat exchanger 32. A fluid line 34 selectively delivers a fluid to either heat or cool the refrigerant in heat exchanger 32. A control 19 is shown schematically, and controls the refrigerant system in a manner such that the temperature of the water delivered to heat exchanger 22 is at a desired “setpoint” for the air being delivered through the element 24 into the building 21.


Again, the operation of such systems is as known.


Recently, third party data suppliers are providing information known as a marginal operating emission rate (“MOER”). FIG. 2 shows an example of what an MOER might look like. A graph of the quantum of emissions over time is shown. It is known that during a day, and across seasons, an electricity supply system will rely on fossil fuel (“dirty”) for a certain percentage and more renewable or green sources (“clean”) as available. As an example, wind, nuclear or solar power are used to supplement fossil fuel.


However, the percentage of “clean” power varies with the availability of, say, wind, nuclear and solar energy. As such, as shown at FIG. 2, the quantum at point X, midnight, may be relatively high. By noon the next day, that value at Y may have fallen. By point Z the value may have again increased.


As shown at I, the chart varies with time, season, etc., and further with the weather of a particular day. That is, as shown at I, it is not always variable simply by the hour of the day.


The present disclosure includes control 19 being programmed to respond to the predicted high emissions level, and adjust a set point of the air being delivered into the building 21. The control 19 is provided with information such as shown in FIG. 2 predicting the emissions overtime.


Now, as shown in FIG. 3A, the MOER at 40 is shown having a “dirty” increasing spike at 42. A cooling water temperature setpoint 48 is increased at 49 to reduce the volume use of the dirty energy. As point 42 passes, the cooling water temperature setpoint is controlled to drop lower at 50 to help the temperature within the building recover. When the setpoint is initially changed in the opposed direction, it may change to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time. The cooling water temperature setpoint then increases at 51 back to the actual desired level once the MOER returns to its normal number 43.


By doing this, the overall carbon emission from the chiller/heat pump system 20 is reduced. The reduction may not be enormous, but over time even small reductions are valuable.


It should be understood that there is a good deal of thermal inertia in a chiller/heat pump system such as system 20, and thus even though the water temperature setpoint is increased at 49, the air would not necessarily immediately become unduly warm. Also, the increase need not be large.


It should be understood that FIG. 3A shows the system 20 operating in a cooling mode. It is also shown that the renewable electric power line 44 would include a drop at 46 to coincide with the spike 42.



FIG. 3B shows how the control 19 is programmed to control the chiller/heat pump system 20 when operating in a heating mode. Now, the water temperature setpoint 48 drops at 60 when the spike 42 occurs, and increases at 62 when the MOER returns to its normal level at 43, or when the building temperature becomes unacceptable. Increase 62 allows the building temperature to quickly recover. The setpoint then moves down from point 62 to the actual desired setpoint 63 after a period of time.


In addition, it can be seen that the electrical power 44 has a drop 46 consistent with the spike 42 and then an increase 64.



FIG. 3C shows one other control mode. Here, the MOER 40 has a long spike 42. The water temperature setpoint line 48 then increases at 149 for a period of time before dropping at 150, and then cyclically moving between 149 and 150 until returning to a desired level at 151. In this manner, when a long spike is expected, the occupants of the building 21 will not see as uncomfortable of temperatures in the ambient air. Note, FIG. 3C shows operation in a cooling mode but the same could occur in a heating mode.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart for the disclosed method. At step 100, a chiller is operated.


At step 101, clean and dirty energy times are identified such as from a MOER. Then, at step 102, a temperature setpoint is adjusted based upon the relative clean and dirty energy over time.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram 200 of a model predictive control. An output 202 goes to the control 90 for the chiller/heat pump system. A predictor 204 receives the MOER information at 206. The predictor also receives the output, and is able to calculate carbon emission and the actual room temperature that will be experienced in the building. An input 216 may be a reference temperature such as from the building.


An optimizer 208 is programmed to make the decisions and operate the method as disclosed above. Optimizer 208 is provided with cost function information 210 and constraints at 212. The constraints may be, as an example, a limit on how far out of the target temperature the control may move the temperature away from a desired temperature and limits for how long. A building field or model 214 is also provided.


While the system 200 is shown here separate from the control 19, it may of course be built into the control 19.


The model predictive control 200 is operable to calculate a carbon emissions savings based upon the method and apparatus of this disclosure. As one simple example, the predicted emissions per BTU of energy can be utilized in combination with the reduction in BTUs over the period of time for each reduction to reach a quantum of carbon emissions saved by this method. Such savings can then be reported to various organizations that credit carbon emission savings. While the basic algorithm for calculating carbon emission saving is mentioned above, more refined algorithms may be developed.


While a chiller is specifically disclosed it should be understood that the same basic concept could extend to other types of chiller/heat pump system including standard air conditioning systems, as an example.


Although embodiments of this disclosure have been shown, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that modifications would come within the scope of this disclosure. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A building chiller/heat pump system comprising: a chiller/heat pump system for supplying a conditioned fluid to change a temperature of air being delivered into a building, said chiller/heat pump system being provided with a control to achieve a desired water temperature setpoint to condition the air delivered into the building; andthe control being programmed to receive a prediction of expected emission levels in energy that will be delivered to power the chiller/heat pump system, and the control being programmed to change the setpoint such that an energy level required to operate the chiller/heat pump system to achieve the setpoint will drop when the expected emissions level increases, and adjusts the setpoint in an opposed direction when the expected emissions drops.
  • 2. The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein when the available energy is relatively dirty, and the chiller/heat pump system is operating in a cooling mode, the setpoint is increased for a period of time, and if the chiller/heat pump is operating in a heating mode, the setpoint is decreased for a period of time.
  • 3. The system as set forth in claim 2, wherein when the setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.
  • 4. The system as set forth in claim 2, wherein the prediction is a prediction of quantity of emissions per a unit of energy.
  • 5. The system as set forth in claim 3, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 6. The system as set forth in claim 2, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 7. The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein when the setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.
  • 8. The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein the prediction is a prediction of quantity of emissions per a unit of energy.
  • 9. The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 10. The system as set forth in claim 1, wherein the control is programmed to calculate a quantity of reduced emission based upon the adjustment of the set point.
  • 11. A method of operating a chiller/heat pump system: operating a chiller/heat pump system for supplying a conditioned fluid to change a temperature of air being delivered into the building, said chiller/heat pump system being provided with a control to achieve a desired water temperature setpoint to condition the air delivered into the building; andthe control receiving a prediction of expected emissions levels in energy that will be delivered to power the chiller/heat pump system, and the control changing the setpoint such that an energy level required to operate the chiller/heat pump system to achieve the setpoint will drop when the emissions level increases, and adjusts the setpoint in an opposed direction when the expected emissions level drops.
  • 12. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein when the available energy is relatively dirty, and the chiller/heat pump system is operating in a cooling mode, the setpoint is increased for a period of time, and if the chiller/heat pump is operating in a heating mode, the setpoint is decreased for a period of time.
  • 13. The method as set forth in claim 12, wherein when the setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.
  • 14. The method as set forth in claim 12, wherein the prediction is a prediction of quantity of emissions per a unit of energy.
  • 15. The method as set forth in claim 14, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 16. The method as set forth in claim 12, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 17. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein when the setpoint is changed in the opposed direction, it is changed to a magnitude that exceeds the actual desired setpoint at that time.
  • 18. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein the prediction is a prediction of quantity of emissions per a unit of energy.
  • 19. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein the change in the setpoint occurs across a plurality of cycles during an extended period of relatively dirty power supply.
  • 20. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein the control is programmed to calculate a quantity of reduced emission based upon the adjustment of the set point.
RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/535,274, filed Aug. 29, 2023, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.

Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63535274 Aug 2023 US