The present invention relates to a method of building a structure and also to a method to strengthening, or reducing the deflection of, a built structure.
The invention has been primarily developed for use in relation to steel portal frame structures and will be described hereinafter with reference to this application. However, the invention is not limited to this field of use and is also applicable for other structural and architectural works.
When designing a structure or building, consideration must be given to, amongst others requirements, the requirements of strength, deflection and dynamics. It is common for additional material to be required in a structure to satisfy deflection requirements, when compared to the material required to satisfy strength requirements. The additional material increases material and construction costs and can also adversely affect the building's dynamic response (particularly to earthquakes) and also requires a corresponding increase in the building's foundations.
It is important that the amount of materials used in building structures is minimised from a cost and environmental standpoint. It is an object of the present invention to reduce the material required in a building whilst still satisfying deflection criteria.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of building a structure, the method including the steps of:
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method of building a structure, the method including the steps of:
In a third aspect, the present invention provides a method of strengthening, or reducing the deflection of, a built structure, the method including the steps of:
The cable retainers are adapted to follow the tensile line of resistance the sub-structure is subjected when loaded during use.
Preferably, the method includes assembling at least two sub-structures into a structure.
Preferably also, the method includes inserting at least two cables into the cable retainer.
The cable is preferably bonded to the cable retainer by any one of the following: welding, gluing (including grouting, most preferably with cementitous grout), or by expanding the cable retainer relative to the cable or shrinking the cable relative to the cable retainer (for example by heating the cable retainer and/or by cooling the cable and thereafter allowing them to shrink and/or expand into engagement with one another) prior to inserting the cable into the cable retainer.
The tensile force is preferably applied to the cable by jacking.
The structure is preferably a steel portal frame structure, more preferably produced from I or T section beams or from tubular truss assemblies.
When the sub-structure is in the form of an I or T section beam, the cable retainer are attached to the web of the beam and, most preferably, passes through the flange of the beam. When the sub-structure is a truss assembly, the cable retainer is in the form of one of the tubular members integral with the truss.
The sub-structure is preferably utilised in the centre span of the structure. However, the sub-structure can also be used in the columns or walls of the structure.
In one form, the cable retainer extends within the boundaries of its associated sub-structure. In another form, the cable retainer is attached to the sub-structure external the boundaries of sub-structure.
A preferred form of the present invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
The centre span 22 has a first cable retainer 28 attached thereto, by welding in the regions 30 and via the struts 32 in the region 34. Each of the columns 24 also have cable retainers 36 attached thereto by welding.
Cables, represented by double headed arrows 38 and 40, are passed through the cable retainers 28 and 36 respectively. The cables 38, 40 are tensioned relative to the cable retainers 28, 36 respectively then bonded to the cable retainers 28, 36 respectively, prior to releasing the tension in the cables. The tensioning, bonding and releasing steps shall be described in more detail below.
The cable retainers 28, 36 extend generally along the longitudinal direction of their associated centre span (sub-structure) 22 or column (sub-structure) 24. More particularly, the cable retainers 28, 36 are positioned to follow the tensile line of resistance of their associated sub-structure when the structure 20 is subjected to its intended load during use.
For example, the steel portal frame structure 20 shown in
The resulting structure is able to better resist deflection under its designed load conditions as the tension applied to the cables relative to their associated sub-structure stores strain energy in the resulting sub-structure. Accordingly, as forces are applied to structure, the counter strain stored in the sub-structure resists the application of that load.
The resulting structure can, within certain boundaries, accept load with reduced strain and thus has an increased load carrying capacity for a given deflection. A 50-100% reduction in deflection can result compared to a similar sized existing structure.
The steel portal frame structures shown in
The structure 50 shown in
The structure 60 shown in
The structure 70 shown in
The structure 80 shown in
The structure 90 shown in
The structure 100 shown in
The structure 110 shown in
The structure 120 shown in
The structure 130 shown in
The structure 140 shown in
As an alternative, one or more of the sub-structures can be assembled and tensioned according to the method described above, and then subsequently attached to the sub-structures. For example, the centre span sub-structure can be assembled on the ground and, after tensioned cables have been bonded thereto, be raised into its final position and connected to the column sub-structures.
As a further alternative, cable retainers can be added to a pre-existing structure, or a new structure built without them, which are then tensioned and bonded in the manner described above. This finds particular application in improving the strength and/or deflection performance of an existing built structure or structure whose design is complete.
The structures described above can be designed to meet strength and dynamic requirements, whilst reducing the need to increase the material added to the structure to satisfy deflection requirements. The embodiments described previously advantageously enable the span of a structure to be increased whilst using the same amount of materials to thus provide a larger structure for the same material cost. Conversely, a structure with a like span to an existing structure can be produced using a reduced amount of materials. The structures described above are also lighter and cheaper than existing comparable structures, particularly when foundation saving are taken into account.
Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention can be embodied in many other forms. For example, the cable retainers can be of any shape and any number of cables can be inserted therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004904034 | Jul 2004 | AU | national |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/572,407, filed Jan. 19, 2007, which is a national phase application of International Application No. PCT/AU2005/001077, filed Jul. 21, 2005, designating the United States and claiming priority to Australian Patent Application No. 2004904034, filed Jul. 21, 2004, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1554061 | Wylie | Sep 1925 | A |
1686910 | Frease | Oct 1928 | A |
2234663 | Anderegg | Mar 1941 | A |
2675695 | Coff | Apr 1954 | A |
2822068 | Hendrix | Feb 1958 | A |
2877506 | Almoslino | Mar 1959 | A |
2986246 | Lester | May 1961 | A |
3010257 | Naillon | Nov 1961 | A |
3247635 | Burns | Apr 1966 | A |
3251162 | Strimple | May 1966 | A |
3280521 | Keathly | Oct 1966 | A |
3341995 | Docken | Sep 1967 | A |
3362117 | Raden | Jan 1968 | A |
3778946 | Wood et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3971179 | Bodocsi et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4047341 | Bernardi | Sep 1977 | A |
4125978 | Schildge, Jr. | Nov 1978 | A |
4144686 | Gold | Mar 1979 | A |
4275537 | Pinson | Jun 1981 | A |
4393637 | Mosier | Jul 1983 | A |
4607470 | Ecker | Aug 1986 | A |
4631883 | Harris et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4676045 | Ellen | Jun 1987 | A |
4890437 | Quaile | Jan 1990 | A |
5050366 | Gardner et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5159790 | Harding | Nov 1992 | A |
5175968 | Saucke | Jan 1993 | A |
5218801 | Hereford | Jun 1993 | A |
5299445 | Yee | Apr 1994 | A |
5313749 | Conner | May 1994 | A |
5426899 | Jones | Jun 1995 | A |
5471812 | Muller | Dec 1995 | A |
5487242 | Stafford | Jan 1996 | A |
5671572 | Siller-Franco | Sep 1997 | A |
6145268 | Korzen | Nov 2000 | A |
6155019 | Ashton et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6892410 | Tokuno et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7721496 | Carlson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20020083659 | Sorkin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020194808 | Ratliff | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030182886 | Parrish | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213192 | Pittman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040065030 | Zambelli et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040148880 | Hayes | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6108690 | Feb 1991 | AU |
2 137 051 | Jan 1996 | CA |
1 609 806 | Apr 1970 | DE |
3 515 052 | Oct 1986 | DE |
0 060 352 | Sep 1982 | EP |
0 211 671 | Feb 1987 | EP |
0 237 667 | Sep 1987 | EP |
1 054 106 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2 666 607 | Mar 1992 | FR |
08-041820 | Feb 1996 | JP |
11-158819 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-190100 | Jul 1999 | JP |
9322521 | Nov 1993 | WO |
0028168 | May 2000 | WO |
0142584 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0196679 | Dec 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Portal. (n.d.). Collins English Dictionary—Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition. Retrieved Apr. 4, 2012, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/portal. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100257814 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11572407 | US | |
Child | 12821919 | US |