Bulk acoustic resonator electrical impedance transformers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7855618
  • Patent Number
    7,855,618
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 30, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 21, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
An electrical impedance transformer comprises a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency. The electrical impedance transformer also comprises: a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR. The electrical impedance transformer also includes a decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs. The first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same.
Description
BACKGROUND

In many applications, it is useful to provide an electrical impedance transformation from an input having one impedance to an output having another electrical impedance. For example, in many communication devices, an antenna is used to receive signal and to transmit signals. The received signals are provided to a receiving amplifier of a receiver of the communication device. Moreover, the antenna may receive signals from a transmitter amplifier of a transmitter. Regardless of whether the transmission/reception of signals is half or full duplex, or even simplex, often times the antenna has an impedance that varies from the impedance of the amplifier (receiver or transmitter). As should be appreciated, mismatched impedances result in reflections and losses that are beneficially avoided.


Among other technologies, electrical impedance transformers can be based on bulk acoustic waves (BAW) devices. One type of electrical impedance transformer is based on a film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) structure. The transformer includes two acoustic stacks, each comprising a layer of piezoelectric material disposed between two electrodes. A decoupling material is disposed between the acoustic stacks. Acoustic waves achieve resonance across the acoustic stacks, with the resonant frequency of the waves being determined by the materials in the acoustic stack.


FBARs are similar in principle to bulk acoustic resonators such as quartz, but are scaled down to resonate at GHz frequencies. Because the FBARs have thicknesses on the order of microns, and length and width dimensions of hundreds of microns, FBARs beneficially provide a comparatively compact alternative to known resonators. However, certain known BAW-based electrical impedance transformers suffer from, among other drawbacks, insertion loss and reduced bandwidth.


There is a need, therefore, for an electrical impedance transformer that overcomes at least the shortcoming of known electrical impedance transformers discussed above.


SUMMARY

In a representative embodiment, an electrical impedance transformer, comprises a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency. The first FBAR comprises: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness. The first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes. The electrical impedance transformer also comprises: a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR. The second FBAR comprises: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness. The second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes. The electrical impedance transformer also includes a decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs. The first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same.


In another representative embodiment, a communication device, comprising: a first port; a second port; and an electrical impedance transformer. The electrical impedance transformer comprises a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency. The first FBAR comprises: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness. The first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes. The electrical impedance transformer also comprises: a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR. The second FBAR comprises: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness. The second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes. The electrical impedance transformer also includes a decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs. The first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present teachings are best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawing figures. The features are not necessarily drawn to scale. Wherever practical, like reference numerals refer to like features.



FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an electrical impedance transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment.



FIG. 1B is a top view of the electrical impedance transformer of the representative embodiment of FIG. 1A.



FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic view of a portion of a communication device including an electrical impedance transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic view of a portion of a communication device including an electrical impedance transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of a Q-circle (S11 and S22 parameters) of two FBARs in accordance with a representative embodiment.



FIG. 5A is a graphical representation of a Q-circle (S11 and S22) of an electrical impedance transformer of a representative embodiment.



FIG. 5B is a graphical representation of the transmission coefficient S12 versus frequency in accordance with an electrical impedance transformer of a representative embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a simplified schematic view of a communications device in accordance with a representative embodiment.





DEFINED TERMINOLOGY

As used herein, the terms ‘a’ or ‘an’, as used herein are defined as one or more than one.


As used herein, the term “electric impedance” refers to a measure of the impediment to the flow of alternating current caused by a combination of resistance and reactance and typically is measured in ohms at a given frequency.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, representative embodiments disclosing specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present teachings. Descriptions of known devices, materials and manufacturing methods may be omitted so as to avoid obscuring the description of the example embodiments. Nonetheless, such devices, materials and methods that are within the purview of one of ordinary skill in the art may be used in accordance with the representative embodiments.


Representative embodiments are described in the context of FBAR-based electrical impedance transformers. It is noted that the term ‘electrical impedance’ may be referred to simply as ‘impedance.’ The term ‘acoustic impedance’ will always be referred to as such to avoid its being confused with the electrical impedance. As will become clearer as the present description continues, the electrical impedance transformers of the representative embodiments may comprise stacked FBARs of the representative having an acoustically decoupling layer between FBARs have certain features common to those described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,019,605 to Larson, III and entitled “Stacked Bulk Acoustic Resonator Band-Pass Filter with Controllable Pass Bandwidth;” and certain features common to those described in commonly owned US Patent Publication 20070176710, to Jamneala, et al. The disclosures of this patent and patent publication are specifically incorporated herein by reference.



FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional view of an electrical impedance transformer 100 in accordance with a representative embodiment. The impedance transformer 100 comprises a substrate 101 having a cavity 102 (or acoustic mirror) therein. A first FBAR stack resonator 103 is disposed over the cavity 102 of the substrate 101 resulting in an FBAR membrane. The impedance transformer 100 comprises a second FBAR resonator 104 disposed over the first FBAR resonator 103. An acoustic decoupler 105 is disposed between the first and second FBARs as shown. In representative embodiments, decoupler 105 comprises dielectric polymer SiLK® commercially provided by E.I. Dupont, Inc., USA. In other embodiments, the acoustic decoupler 105 is formed of a stack of layers alternately formed of high and low acoustic impedance materials and having respective thicknesses of approximately one-quarter of the wavelength corresponding to the target resonant frequency of the balun. It is emphasized that other materials and arrangements for layer 105 are contemplated. Some illustrative materials may be found in the incorporated references to Larson III, et al., and Jamneala, et al.


The cavity or reflector (e.g., a mismatched acoustic Bragg reflector) 102 and its fabrication may be as described in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,721, to Lakin, the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated into this disclosure by reference in its entirety. Moreover, the cavity 102 may be fabricated according to known semiconductor processing methods and using known materials. Illustratively, the cavity 102 may be fabricated according to the teachings of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,587,620, 5,873,153 and 6,507,983 to Ruby, et al. The disclosures of these patents are specifically incorporated herein by reference. It is emphasized that the methods described in these patents are representative and other methods of fabrication and materials within the purview of one of ordinary skill in the art are contemplated.


The first FBAR resonator 103 comprises a first set of electrodes 106, 108, and a first piezoelectric layer 107 therebetween. In a representative embodiment, the first piezoelectric layer 107 comprises aluminum nitride (AlN) although other materials within the purview of one of ordinary skill in the art may be used in place of or in addition to AlN. As described more fully herein, the electrodes 106,108 are selected based on the desired impedance of the first FBAR resonator.


The second FBAR resonator 104 comprises a second set of electrodes 109, 111, and a second piezoelectric layer 110 therebetween. In a representative embodiment, the second piezoelectric layer 110 comprises aluminum nitride (AlN) although other materials within the purview of one of ordinary skill in the art may be used in place of or in addition to AlN. As described more fully herein, the electrodes 109, 111 are selected based on the desired impedance of the second FBAR resonator 104.


In a representative embodiment, the first piezoelectric layer 107 has a first thickness (t) and the second piezoelectric layer 110 has a second thickness (t+∂t), which is greater that ‘t.’ The thicknesses of the layers 107, 110 are selected to provide a different electrical impedance for the first and second FBAR resonators. In particular, the capacitance of the FBAR is inversely proportional to the thickness of the piezoelectric layer between the electrodes if the areas are equal. In turn, the electrical impedance is inversely proportional to the capacitance; and as such the electrical impedance is proportional to the thickness of the piezoelectric layer of the FBAR resonator. In representative embodiments, the ratio of the impedances (relative value) of the first and second FBAR resonators 103, 104 is set by selecting the ratio of the thicknesses t and t+∂t. For example, in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 1A, the thickness t of the first FBAR resonator 103 is smaller than the thickness (t+∂t) of the second FBAR resonator 104. In this way, the electrical impedance of the second FBAR resonator 104 is larger than the electrical impedance of the first FBAR 103. As will be described more fully herein, the absolute value of the electrical impedances of the first and second FBAR resonators 103, 104 are set by selecting the areal dimensions of the FBAR resonators. In representative embodiments, the areas of the two FBARs are substantially equal and are substantially overlapping.


As will be appreciated, a change in the thickness of the piezoelectric material will result in a change in the resonant frequency (f0) of the FBAR resonator. However, the resonant frequency of the two FBAR resonators 103,104 of the electrical impedance transformer 100 must be substantially the same. (By substantially the same, the resonant frequencies are the same within some acceptable tolerance). One way to maintain the same the same resonant frequencies in the first and second FBARs 103,104, the overall acoustic thicknesses of the first and second FBARs 103, 104 are made substantially the same by increasing the thickness of the first set of electrodes 106, 108. However, while providing the desired resonant frequency, the electromechanical coupling coefficient, kt2, which is proportional to the ratio of the electric energy density in a particular volume to the acoustic energy in a particular volume, can be comparatively degraded by providing relatively thick electrodes. As should be appreciated, degradation of kt2 results in an undesirable reduction in insertion loss and decrease in bandwidth.


In accordance with representative embodiment of FIG. 1A, the resonant frequency of the first and second FBARs 103, 104 is set to substantially the same value, while the coupling coefficient, kt2, is substantially unchanged in the FBAR having decreased electrical impedance by selecting a material for the first set of electrodes 106, 108 that has a greater acoustic impedance (and is more mechanically rigid (i.e., ‘stiffer’)) than the material selected for the second set of electrodes 109, 111. Stated differently, the piezoelectric layer having a comparatively reduced thickness has a set of electrodes of a material that has a greater acoustic impedance. As should be appreciated, because the material having a greater acoustic impedance is used for the first set of electrodes 106, 108, their thickness can be comparatively reduced, and thus the desired resonant frequency can be attained. Moreover, because the overall thickness of the electrodes 106, 108 is also comparatively reduced, the deleterious impact of thicker electrodes on the coupling coefficient, kt2, can also be substantially avoided.


In a representative embodiment, the first set of electrodes 106, 108 are made of or comprise tungsten (W) or an alloy thereof, whereas the second set of electrodes 109, 111 are made of or comprise molybdenum (Mo). With these selected materials the lower impedance first FBAR 103 is provided with substantially the same resonant frequency and coupling coefficient, kt2, as the second FBAR 104. By way of comparison, for transformers working at a frequency of about 2 GHz and achieving a 2:1 impedance transformation ratio, the thickness of the piezoelectric layers 107 is approximately 1.0 μm, the thicknesses of electrodes (illustratively Tungsten) 106, 108 are about 2500 Angstroms, the thickness of piezoelectric layer 110 is approximately 2 μm and the thickness of the electrodes (illustratively molybdenum) 109, 111 are approximately 2000 Å.


The selection of the thicknesses, t and t+∂t, of the piezoelectric layers 107 and 110 determine the ratio of the impedances of the first FBAR 103 and the second FBAR 104 for a desired resonant frequency and coupling coefficient. For instance, the thicknesses of the various materials of the FBARs may be selected to provide a 2:1 impedance ratio, where the second FBAR 104, having a comparatively thick piezoelectric material, has twice the electrical impedance of the first FBAR 103. Selection of the absolute impedance (e.g., 50Ω to 100Ω transformation) is determined by the suitable selection of the areal dimension of the overlapping stacked FBARs.



FIG. 1B is a top view of the electrical impedance transformer 100. The electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106 may be selectively apodized and may include mass loading layers and other performance enhancing features. The use of apodization and mass loading are known to those of ordinary skill in the art and details thereof are generally omitted in order to avoid obscuring the description of the representative embodiments. For example, details of apodization may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,629,865, entitled “Piezoelectric Resonator Structures and Electrical Filters” to Richard C. Ruby, et al. In addition, details of mass loading may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,007, entitled “Thin Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator with Mass Loaded Perimeter” to Hongjun Feng, et al.; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/713,726, entitled “Piezoelectric Resonator Structures and Electrical Filters having Frame Elements” to Jamneala, et al. Furthermore, the FBARs 103, 104 may include frame structures such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,684, entitled “Acoustic Resonator Performance Enhancement Using Alternating Frame Structure” to Richard C. Ruby, et al.


As should be appreciated, the first and second FBARs 103, 104 comprise a coupled resonator structure. As such, only the area of overlap function as coupled acoustic resonators. Therefore, the shapes and dimensions of the electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106, and intervening piezoelectric layers 107, 110, are selected to substantially the same (i.e., to within manufacturing tolerances). Moreover, the electrodes and piezoelectric layers are aligned to substantially overlap (again to within manufacturing tolerances), thereby substantially optimizing the overlap of the FBARS 103,104.


The area of the first and second FBARs 103, 104 is determined by the area of the electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106, and intervening piezoelectric layers 107, 110. Moreover, the absolute impedances of the first and second FBARs 103, 104 are determined by the areal dimensions of the first and second FBARs 103, 104. Thus, the selection of the areal dimensions of the electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106, and intervening piezoelectric layers 107, 110 is used to select the absolute impedances of the first and second FBARs 103, 104.


In practice, once the thicknesses of the piezoelectric layers 107,110 are determined for the desired ratio of the impedance of the first FBAR 103 to the impedance of the second FBAR 104, the layers of the stacked FBAR structure are formed by known processing methods, such as described in one or more of the incorporated references above. To provide the absolute impedance of the first FBAR 103 and of the second FBAR 104, the electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106 and piezoelectric layers 107, 110 are fabricated with the required areal dimensions to effect the desired impedances.


Continuing with the previous illustrative ratio, the thickness of the piezoelectric layers 107, 110 are selected to provide a 2:1 impedance ratio of the second FBAR 104 to the first FBAR 103; and the electrodes 111, 109, 108 and 106, and piezoelectric layers 107, 110 are sized so that the areal dimensions provide a second FBAR 104 of 100Ω and a first FBAR 103 of 50Ω. Of course, the areal dimensions could provide other impedances; for instance the second FBAR 104 could be 200Ω and the first FBAR 103 could 100Ω by selection of the areal dimension. Alternatively, the ratio could be changed to another value and the areal dimension selected to suit a particular need.



FIG. 2 is a simplified schematic view of a portion of a communication device 200 including an electrical impedance transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment. By ‘portion’ is meant only the elements germane to the present discussion are shown. Naturally, a communication device (e.g., a mobile phone) includes a large number of components, which while necessary to its function, need not be described in order to properly describe the function of the transformer 100 within the device 200. Thus, these components are not described to avoid obscuring the description of the illustrative embodiments.


The device 200 includes the electrical impedance transformer 100 including the first and second FBARs 103, 104. The substrate 101 is not illustrated for simplicity. Notably, many details of the transformer 100 described in conjunction with FIGS. 1A and 1B are common to the device 200 and are not repeated. An input 201 is connected to an antenna 202. The input 201 is connected to the first FBAR 103 having a first electrical impedance. An electrical signal from the input 201 is converted to an acoustic signal and is coupled to the second FBAR 104 having a second electrical impedance. The second FBAR 104 converts the acoustic signal to an electrical signal and provides the electrical signal to an output 203. In the representative embodiment, the output is connected to a receiver amplifier 204, which amplifies the signal for further processing at a receiver (not shown in FIG. 2.) Continuing with the previous example, with the thicknesses and areal dimensions selected, a signal from a 50Ω input 201 is provided to a 100Ω output 203 by the transformer 100 of an illustrative embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic view of a portion of a communication device 300 including an electrical impedance transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment. Again, by ‘portion’ is meant only the elements germane to the present discussion are shown. Naturally, a communication device (e.g., a mobile phone) includes a large number of components, which while necessary to its function, need not be described in order to properly describe the function of the transformer 100 within the device 300. Thus, these components are not described to avoid obscuring the description of the illustrative embodiments.


The device 300 includes the electrical impedance transformer 100 including the first and second FBARs 103, 104. The substrate 101 is not illustrated for simplicity. Notably, many details of the transformer 100 described in conjunction with FIGS. 1A and 1B are common to the device 300 and are not repeated. An input 301 is connected to a transmit amplifier 302. The input 301 is connected to the first FBAR 103 having a first electrical impedance. An electrical signal from the input 301 is converted to an acoustic signal and is coupled to the second FBAR 104 having a second electrical impedance. The second FBAR 104 converts the acoustic signal to an electrical signal and provides the electrical signal to an output 303. In the representative embodiment, the output 303 is connected to an antenna 304, which transmits the signal to a receiver (not shown in FIG. 3.) Continuing with the previous example, with the thicknesses and areal dimensions selected, a signal from a 50Ω input 301 is provided to a 100Ω output 303 by the transformer 100 of an illustrative embodiment.


Applicants note that the device 200, 300 are merely illustrative and not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings. Notably, variations of the transformer 100 and connections thereto are contemplated. For instance, the transformation of input to output can be different than the step-up described. As such, the inputs 201, 301 could be at a higher impedance (e.g., 100Ω) and the outputs 203, 303 could be at a lower impedance (e.g., 50Ω). Furthermore, the electrical transformer 100 could be used in a wide variety of applications, and thus is not limited to the communications applications described. Generally, the electrical transformer 100 may be used in many types of electronic device to perform such functions as transforming impedances, linking single-ended circuitry with balanced circuitry or vice versa and providing electrical isolation.



FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of a Q-circle (S11 and S22 parameters) of two FBARs forming the acoustic transformer in accordance with a representative embodiment. The two FBARs have substantially the same resonant frequency, but the electrodes of one of the FBARs comprise a material with a comparatively higher acoustic impedance (e.g., W), while the electrodes of the other FBAR have a comparatively lower acoustic impedance (e.g., Mo). Due to the enhanced coupling coefficient provided by the electrodes having a higher acoustic impedance, the thickness of the piezoelectric layer (in this case AlN) is reduced with no significant variation in coupling coefficient, kt2, or resonant frequency, f0.



FIG. 5A is a graphical representation of a Q-circle (S11 and S22) of an electrical impedance transformer of a representative embodiment. The FBARs are arranged in a stacked (DSBAR) configuration with approximately 1300 Angstroms of SiLK used as the acoustic decoupler. The resultant return loss plots for input, S11, and the output, S22, where the source impedances are 32 Ohms and 50 Ohm respectively.



FIG. 5B is a graphical representation of the transmission coefficient (S12) versus frequency of the electrical impedance transformer described in connection with FIG. 5A. In the representative embodiment, the 2 dB bandwidth of 108 MHz BW is achieved.



FIG. 6 is a simplified schematic view of a communications device 600 in accordance with a representative embodiment. The communications device 600 includes an electrical impedance transformer 601, which is substantially identical to one of the impedance transformers described previously. The communications device includes an input/output 602 to an antenna; a transmitter 603 and a receiver 604. The device 600 may function in half or full duplex mode; and the impedance transformer 601 may provide a step-up or a step-down electrical impedance transformation. Moreover, the device may include more that one electrical impedance transformer 601; and may be configured in a different manner than shown.


In view of this disclosure it is noted that the various acoustic resonator filters described herein can be implemented in a variety of materials and variant structures. Moreover, applications other than resonator filters may benefit from the present teachings. Further, the various materials, structures and parameters are included by way of example only and not in any limiting sense. In view of this disclosure, those skilled in the art can implement the present teachings in determining their own applications and needed materials and equipment to implement these applications, while remaining within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An electrical impedance transformer, comprising: a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency comprising: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance, the first set of electrodes comprising a first material; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness, wherein the first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes;a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR, the second FBAR comprising: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance, the second set of electrodes comprising a second material; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness, wherein the second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes, wherein the first thickness is less than the second thickness, and the first material is different than the second material; anda decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs, wherein the first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same.
  • 2. An electrical impedance transformer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first set of electrodes comprise tungsten (W).
  • 3. An electrical impedance transformer as claimed in claim 1, wherein the second set of electrodes comprise tungsten (W).
  • 4. A communication device, comprising: a first port;a second port; andan electrical impedance transformer between the first port and the second port, the transformer comprising:a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency comprising: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance, the first set of electrodes comprising a first material; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness, wherein the first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes;a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR, the second FBAR comprising: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance, the second set of electrodes comprising a second material; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness, wherein the second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes; anda decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs, wherein the first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same, wherein the first thickness is less than the second thickness, and the first material is different than the second material.
  • 5. An electrical impedance transformer as claimed in claim 4, wherein the first set of electrodes comprise tungsten (W).
  • 6. An electrical impedance transformer as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second set of electrodes comprise tungsten (W).
  • 7. A communication device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the first port is an input and comprises an antenna.
  • 8. A communication device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second port is an output and is connected to an amplifier.
  • 9. A communication device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the first port is an output and comprises an antenna.
  • 10. A communication device as claimed in claim 4, wherein the second port is an input and is connected to an amplifier.
  • 11. An electrical impedance transformer, comprising: a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency comprising: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance, the first set electrodes comprising a first material; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness, wherein the first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes;a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR, the second FBAR comprising: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance, the second set electrodes comprising a second material; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness, wherein the second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes, wherein the second thickness is less than the first thickness, and the first material is different than the second material; anda decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs, wherein the first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same.
  • 12. A communication device, comprising: a first port;a second port; andan electrical impedance transformer between the first port and the second port, the transformer comprising:a first film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), having a first electrical impedance and a first resonance frequency comprising: a first set of electrodes, having a first acoustic impedance, the first set of electrodes comprising a first material; and a first piezoelectric layer having a first thickness, wherein the first piezoelectric layer is disposed between the first set of electrodes;a second FBAR, having a second electrical impedance and a second resonance frequency, and being disposed over the first FBAR, the second FBAR comprising: a second set of electrodes, having a second acoustic impedance, which differs from the first acoustic impedance, the second set of electrodes comprising a second material; and a second piezoelectric layer having a second thickness, wherein the second piezoelectric layer is disposed between the second set of electrodes; anda decoupling layer disposed between the first and the second FBARs, wherein the first electrical impedance differs from the second electrical impedance and the first and second resonance frequencies are substantially the same, wherein the second thickness is less than the first thickness, and the first material is different than the second material.
US Referenced Citations (354)
Number Name Date Kind
3174122 Fowler, et al. Mar 1965 A
3189851 Fowler Jun 1965 A
3321648 Kolm May 1967 A
3422371 Poirier et al. Jan 1969 A
3568108 Poirier et al. Mar 1971 A
3582839 Pim et al. Jun 1971 A
3590287 Berlincourt et al. Jun 1971 A
3610969 Clawson et al. Oct 1971 A
3826931 Hammond Jul 1974 A
3845402 Nupp Oct 1974 A
4084217 Brandli et al. Apr 1978 A
4172277 Pinson Oct 1979 A
4272742 Lewis Jun 1981 A
4281299 Newbold Jul 1981 A
4320365 Black et al. Mar 1982 A
4344004 Okubo Aug 1982 A
4355408 Scarrott Oct 1982 A
4456850 Inoue et al. Jun 1984 A
4529904 Hattersley Jul 1985 A
4608541 Moriwaki et al. Aug 1986 A
4625138 Ballato Nov 1986 A
4640756 Wang et al. Feb 1987 A
4719383 Wang et al. Jan 1988 A
4769272 Byrne et al. Sep 1988 A
4798990 Henoch Jan 1989 A
4819215 Yokoyama et al. Apr 1989 A
4836882 Ballato Jun 1989 A
4841429 McClanahan et al. Jun 1989 A
4906840 Zdeblick et al. Mar 1990 A
5048036 Scifres et al. Sep 1991 A
5048038 Brennan et al. Sep 1991 A
5066925 Freitag Nov 1991 A
5075641 Weber et al. Dec 1991 A
5111157 Komiak May 1992 A
5118982 Inoue et al. Jun 1992 A
5129132 Zdeblick et al. Jul 1992 A
5162691 Mariani et al. Nov 1992 A
5185589 Krishnaswamy et al. Feb 1993 A
5214392 Kobayashi et al. May 1993 A
5233259 Krishnaswamy et al. Aug 1993 A
5241209 Sasaki Aug 1993 A
5241456 Marcinkiewicz et al. Aug 1993 A
5262347 Sands Nov 1993 A
5270492 Fukui Dec 1993 A
5294898 Dworsky et al. Mar 1994 A
5361077 Weber Nov 1994 A
5382930 Stokes et al. Jan 1995 A
5384808 Van Brunt et al. Jan 1995 A
5448014 Kong et al. Sep 1995 A
5465725 Seyed-Bolorforosh Nov 1995 A
5475351 Uematsu et al. Dec 1995 A
5548189 Williams Aug 1996 A
5587620 Ruby et al. Dec 1996 A
5589858 Kadowaki et al. Dec 1996 A
5594705 Connor et al. Jan 1997 A
5603324 Oppelt et al. Feb 1997 A
5633574 Sage May 1997 A
5671242 Takiguchi et al. Sep 1997 A
5692279 Mang et al. Dec 1997 A
5704037 Chen Dec 1997 A
5705877 Shimada Jan 1998 A
5714917 Ella Feb 1998 A
5729008 Blalock et al. Mar 1998 A
5789845 Wadaka et al. Aug 1998 A
5835142 Nakamura et al. Nov 1998 A
5853601 Krishaswamy et al. Dec 1998 A
5864261 Weber Jan 1999 A
5866969 Shimada et al. Feb 1999 A
5872493 Ella Feb 1999 A
5873153 Ruby et al. Feb 1999 A
5873154 Ylilammi et al. Feb 1999 A
5894184 Furuhashi et al. Apr 1999 A
5894647 Lakin Apr 1999 A
5910756 Ella Jun 1999 A
5932953 Drees et al. Aug 1999 A
5936150 Kobrin et al. Aug 1999 A
5953479 Zhou et al. Sep 1999 A
5955926 Uda et al. Sep 1999 A
5962787 Okada et al. Oct 1999 A
5982297 Welle Nov 1999 A
6001664 Swirhun et al. Dec 1999 A
6016052 Vaughn Jan 2000 A
6040962 Kanazawa et al. Mar 2000 A
6051907 Ylilammi Apr 2000 A
6060818 Ruby et al. May 2000 A
6087198 Panasik Jul 2000 A
6090687 Merchant et al. Jul 2000 A
6107721 Lakin Aug 2000 A
6111341 Hirama Aug 2000 A
6111480 Iyama et al. Aug 2000 A
6118181 Merchant et al. Sep 2000 A
6124678 Bishop et al. Sep 2000 A
6124756 Yaklin et al. Sep 2000 A
6150703 Cushman et al. Nov 2000 A
6187513 Katakura Feb 2001 B1
6215375 Larson, III et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219032 Rosenberg et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219263 Wuidart Apr 2001 B1
6228675 Ruby et al. May 2001 B1
6229247 Bishop May 2001 B1
6252229 Hays et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262600 Haigh et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262637 Bradley et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263735 Nakatani et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265246 Ruby et al. Jul 2001 B1
6278342 Ella Aug 2001 B1
6292336 Horng et al. Sep 2001 B1
6307447 Barber et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307761 Nakagawa Oct 2001 B1
6335548 Roberts et al. Jan 2002 B1
6355498 Chan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366006 Boyd Apr 2002 B1
6376280 Ruby et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377137 Ruby Apr 2002 B1
6384697 Ruby May 2002 B1
6396200 Misu et al. May 2002 B2
6407649 Tikka et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414569 Nakafuku Jul 2002 B1
6420820 Larson, III Jul 2002 B1
6424237 Ruby et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429511 Ruby et al. Aug 2002 B2
6434030 Rehm et al. Aug 2002 B1
6437482 Shibata Aug 2002 B1
6441539 Kitamura et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441702 Ella et al. Aug 2002 B1
6448695 Milsom Sep 2002 B2
6462631 Bradley et al. Oct 2002 B2
6466105 Lobl et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466418 Horng et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469597 Ruby et al. Oct 2002 B2
6469909 Simmons Oct 2002 B2
6472954 Ruby et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476536 Pensala Nov 2002 B1
6479320 Gooch Nov 2002 B1
6483229 Larson, III et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486751 Barber et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489688 Baumann et al. Dec 2002 B1
6492883 Liang et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496085 Ella et al. Dec 2002 B2
6498604 Jensen Dec 2002 B1
6507983 Ruby et al. Jan 2003 B1
6515558 Ylilammi Feb 2003 B1
6518860 Ella et al. Feb 2003 B2
6525996 Miyazawa Feb 2003 B1
6528344 Kang Mar 2003 B2
6530515 Glenn et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534900 Aigner et al. Mar 2003 B2
6542055 Frank et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548942 Panasik Apr 2003 B1
6548943 Kaitila et al. Apr 2003 B2
6549394 Williams Apr 2003 B1
6550664 Bradley et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559487 Kang et al. May 2003 B1
6559530 Hinzel et al. May 2003 B2
6564448 Oura et al. May 2003 B1
6566956 Ohnishi et al. May 2003 B2
6566979 Larson, III et al. May 2003 B2
6580159 Fusaro et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583374 Knieser et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583688 Klee et al. Jun 2003 B2
6593870 Dummermuth et al. Jul 2003 B2
6594165 Duerbaum et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600390 Frank Jul 2003 B2
6601276 Barber Aug 2003 B2
6603182 Low et al. Aug 2003 B1
6617249 Ruby et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617750 Dummermuth et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617751 Sunwoo et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621137 Ma et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630753 Malik et al. Oct 2003 B2
6635509 Ouellet Oct 2003 B1
6639872 Rein Oct 2003 B1
6651488 Larson, III et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657363 Aigner Dec 2003 B1
6668618 Larson, III et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670866 Ella et al. Dec 2003 B2
6693500 Yang et al. Feb 2004 B2
6710508 Ruby et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710681 Figueredo et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713314 Wong et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714102 Ruby et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720844 Lakin Apr 2004 B1
6720846 Iwashita et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724266 Plazza et al. Apr 2004 B2
6738267 Navas Sabater et al. May 2004 B1
6774746 Whatmore et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777263 Gan et al. Aug 2004 B1
6787048 Bradley et al. Sep 2004 B2
6788170 Kaitila et al. Sep 2004 B1
6803835 Frank Oct 2004 B2
6812619 Kaitila et al. Nov 2004 B1
6828713 Bradley et al. Dec 2004 B2
6842088 Yamada et al. Jan 2005 B2
6842089 Lee Jan 2005 B2
6853534 Williams Feb 2005 B2
6873065 Haigh et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873529 Ikuta Mar 2005 B2
6874211 Bradley et al. Apr 2005 B2
6874212 Larson, III Apr 2005 B2
6888424 Takeuchi et al. May 2005 B2
6900705 Nakamura et al. May 2005 B2
6903452 Ma et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906451 Yamada et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911708 Park Jun 2005 B2
6917261 Unterberger Jul 2005 B2
6924583 Lin et al. Aug 2005 B2
6924717 Ginsburg et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927651 Larson, III et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936928 Hedler et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936954 Peczalski Aug 2005 B2
6943648 Maiz et al. Sep 2005 B2
6946928 Larson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6954121 Bradley et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963257 Ella et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970365 Turchi Nov 2005 B2
6975183 Aigner et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977563 Komuro et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985052 Tikka Jan 2006 B2
6987433 Larson, III et al. Jan 2006 B2
6989723 Komuro et al. Jan 2006 B2
6998940 Metzger Feb 2006 B2
7002437 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2006 B2
7019604 Gotoh et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019605 Larson, III Mar 2006 B2
7026876 Esfandiari et al. Apr 2006 B1
7053456 Matsuo May 2006 B2
7057476 Hwu Jun 2006 B2
7057478 Korden et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064606 Louis Jun 2006 B2
7084553 Ludwiczak Aug 2006 B2
7091649 Larson, III et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098758 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B2
7102460 Schmidhammer et al. Sep 2006 B2
7128941 Lee Oct 2006 B2
7138889 Lakin Nov 2006 B2
7161448 Feng et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170215 Namba et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173504 Larson, III et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187254 Su et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209374 Noro Apr 2007 B2
7212083 Inoue et al. May 2007 B2
7212085 Wu May 2007 B2
7230509 Stoemmer Jun 2007 B2
7230511 Onishi et al. Jun 2007 B2
7259498 Nakatsuka et al. Aug 2007 B2
7275292 Ruby et al. Oct 2007 B2
7276994 Takeuchi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7280007 Feng et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281304 Kim et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294919 Bai Nov 2007 B2
7301258 Masako Nov 2007 B2
7310861 Aigner et al. Dec 2007 B2
7332985 Larson, III et al. Feb 2008 B2
7367095 Larson, III et al. May 2008 B2
7368857 Tanaka May 2008 B2
7369013 Fazzio et al. May 2008 B2
7388318 Yamada et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388454 Ruby et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388455 Larson, III et al. Jun 2008 B2
7408428 Larson, III Aug 2008 B2
7414349 Sasaki Aug 2008 B2
7414495 Iwasaki et al. Aug 2008 B2
7425787 Larson, III Sep 2008 B2
7439824 Aigner Oct 2008 B2
7545532 Muramoto Jun 2009 B2
20020000646 Gooch et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020030424 Iwata Mar 2002 A1
20020063497 Panasik May 2002 A1
20020070463 Chang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020121944 Larson, III et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020121945 Ruby et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140520 Hikita et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152803 Larson, III et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020190814 Yamada et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030001251 Cheever et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030006502 Karpman Jan 2003 A1
20030011285 Ossmann Jan 2003 A1
20030011446 Bradley Jan 2003 A1
20030051550 Nguyen et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030087469 Ma May 2003 A1
20030102776 Takeda et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111439 Fetter et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030128081 Ella et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030132493 Kang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030132809 Senthilkumar et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141946 Ruby et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030179053 Aigner et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030205948 Lin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040016995 Kuo et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040017130 Wang et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040056735 Nomura et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040092234 Pohjonen May 2004 A1
20040124952 Tikka Jul 2004 A1
20040129079 Kato et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040150293 Unterberger Aug 2004 A1
20040150296 Park et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040166603 Carley et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040195937 Matsubara et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040212458 Lee Oct 2004 A1
20040257171 Park et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257172 Schmidhammer et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263287 Ginsburg et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050012570 Korden et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050012716 Mikulin et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050023931 Bouche et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050030126 Inoue et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036604 Scott et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050057117 Nakatsuka et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057324 Onishi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050068124 Stoemmer Mar 2005 A1
20050093396 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050093653 Larson, III May 2005 A1
20050093654 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050093655 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050093657 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050093658 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050093659 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050104690 Larson, III et al. May 2005 A1
20050110598 Larson, III May 2005 A1
20050128030 Larson, III et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140466 Larson, III et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050167795 Higashi Aug 2005 A1
20050193507 Ludwiczak Sep 2005 A1
20050206271 Higuchi et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206483 Pashby et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050218488 Mie Oct 2005 A1
20060071736 Ruby et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060081048 Mikado et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060087199 Larson, III et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060103492 Feng et al. May 2006 A1
20060125489 Feucht et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060132262 Fazzio et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060164183 Tikka et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060185139 Larson, III et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060197411 Hoen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060238070 Costa et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060284707 Larson, III et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060290446 Aigner et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070035364 Sridhar et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070037311 Izumi et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070080759 Jamneala et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070085447 Larson, III Apr 2007 A1
20070085631 Larson, III et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070085632 Larson, III et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086080 Larson, III et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086274 Nishimura et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070090892 Larson, III Apr 2007 A1
20070170815 Unkrich Jul 2007 A1
20070171002 Unkrich Jul 2007 A1
20070176710 Jamneala et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070205850 Jamneala et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070279153 Ruby Dec 2007 A1
20070296521 Schmidhammer Dec 2007 A1
20080055020 Handtmann et al. Mar 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
10160617 Jun 2003 DE
0637875 Feb 1995 EP
689254 Dec 1995 EP
0865157 Sep 1998 EP
973256 Jan 2000 EP
1047189 Oct 2000 EP
1096259 May 2001 EP
1100196 May 2001 EP
1180494 Feb 2002 EP
1249932 Oct 2002 EP
1258989 Nov 2002 EP
1258990 Nov 2002 EP
1517443 Mar 2005 EP
1528674 May 2005 EP
1528675 May 2005 EP
1528676 May 2005 EP
1528677 May 2005 EP
1542362 Jun 2005 EP
1557945 Jul 2005 EP
1575165 Sep 2005 EP
1207974 Oct 1970 GB
2013343 Aug 1979 GB
2411239 Aug 2005 GB
2418791 Apr 2006 GB
2427773 Jan 2007 GB
61054686 Mar 1986 JP
06005944 Jan 1994 JP
2002217676 Aug 2002 JP
2003124779 Apr 2003 JP
WO-9816957 Apr 1998 WO
WO-0106647 Jan 2001 WO
WO-02103900 Dec 2002 WO
WO-03043188 May 2003 WO
WO-03050950 Jun 2003 WO
WO-2003058809 Jul 2003 WO
WO-2004034579 Apr 2004 WO
WO-2004051744 Jun 2004 WO
WO-2005043752 May 2005 WO
WO-2005043753 May 2005 WO
WO-2006018788 Feb 2006 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090273415 A1 Nov 2009 US