The present disclosure relates to bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators capable of operating in higher order modes with enhanced piezoelectric coupling.
The possibility of exciting higher order modes in BAW resonators promises filters capable of operating at higher frequencies than if conventional, fundamental mode BAW resonators were used while maintaining reasonable quality factor, size, and electrode thickness. In higher order modes, stress profiles corresponding with integer multiples of the frequency of the fundamental mode are excited in the piezoelectric layer. For example, in a second order mode, also referred to herein as a second overmode, an entire wavelength of a sinusoid (twice the frequency of the fundamental mode) is fit within a thickness of the piezoelectric layer.
While BAW resonators capable of operating in higher modes promise improved performance at high frequencies, attempts to create such devices have provided very poor electromechanical coupling compared to fundamental mode devices such as the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 discussed above. Accordingly, there is a need for BAW resonators capable of operating in higher order modes such as a second order mode with improved electromechanical coupling.
In one embodiment, an acoustic resonator includes a first piezoelectric layer, a second piezoelectric layer, a coupler layer, a first electrode, and a second electrode. The first piezoelectric layer has a first polarity. The second piezoelectric layer has a second polarity opposite the first polarity. The coupler layer is between the first piezoelectric layer and the second piezoelectric layer. The first electrode is on the first piezoelectric layer opposite the coupler layer. The second electrode is on the second piezoelectric layer opposite the coupler layer. Providing the coupler layer between the first piezoelectric layer and the second piezoelectric layer increases an electromechanical coupling coefficient of the acoustic resonator, thereby improving the performance thereof.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. Likewise, it will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over” or extending “over” another element, it can be directly over or extend directly over the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over” or extending “directly over” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including” when used herein specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
Notably, the first piezoelectric layer 24 has a first polarity, while the second piezoelectric layer 26 has a second polarity that is opposite the first polarity. These polarities have opposing signs of the piezoelectric constant and therefore respond in opposite fashion to the electric field. This allows the second overmode BAW resonator 22 to excite a second order mode as discussed below. In one embodiment, the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 are aluminum nitride (AlN) layers having opposite polarities. For example, the first piezoelectric layer 24 may be a nitrogen polar layer of aluminum nitride (c-AlN), while the second piezoelectric layer 26 may be an aluminum polar layer of aluminum nitride (f-AlN). Said aluminum nitride may be undoped or doped with one or more of scandium (Sc), erbium (Er), magnesium (Mg), hafnium (Hf), or the like. The first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 may be metal layers. For example, the first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 may be aluminum (Al), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), or the like. The thickness (d′) of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 and the thickness (t) of the first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 may be chosen to provide specific electrical and/or acoustic characteristics in order to change one or more operating parameters of the second overmode BAW resonator 22.
As discussed above, one problem facing BAW resonators attempting to excite higher order modes is that they generally have a lower electromechanical coupling coefficient (keff2) than their fundamental mode counterparts. This is illustrated by a comparison of the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 discussed above in the background with the second overmode BAW resonator 22. Assuming the electrodes in both the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 and the second overmode BAW resonator 22 have the same material properties as the piezoelectric layer(s) therein, the displacement profile u(z) of the devices can be expressed according to Equation (1):
where a is the mode amplitude and the wavevector kp is obtained by using stress free boundary conditions T(±d+t)=0 such that kp=π/2(d+t) for the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 and kp=π/(d′+t) for the second overmode BAW resonator 22. A primitive method of calculating the effective electromechanical coupling of these structures comes from the Belincourt formula, which compares stored energy in electrical and mechanical domains. While more sophisticated methods are available for calculating keff2, the treatment shown below provides an intuitive understanding of the principles discussed herein. Using the Belincourt relation, the electromechanical coupling coefficient keff2 is expressed according to Equation (2):
where Um is energy stored in the piezoelectric layers by interchange between electrical and mechanical domains, and is expressed according to Equation (3):
Ue is the mechanical energy stored with the piezoelectric layers, and is expressed according to Equation (4):
and Ud is the electrical energy stored within the dielectric, and is expressed according to Equation (5):
Ud=∈E2d (5)
where e(z) is the piezoelectric constant, E is the electric field, and cp and ∈ are the electric constant and dielectric constant of the piezoelectric layer. For piezoelectric films like aluminum nitride, e(z) is the e33, which is the piezoelectric constant along the c-axis. Substituting the equations for u(z) from Equation (1) into Equation (2), the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 can be expressed according to Equation (6):
and the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator 10 can be expressed according to Equation (7):
A relationship between the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10 and the second overmode BAW resonator 22 can be expressed according to Equation (8):
Equation (8) shows that the second overmode BAW resonator 22 always has a lower electromechanical coupling coefficient than the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10. For most applications, the typical value for m is between 0.2 and 0.3, in which case the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator is only 80-90% that of the fundamental mode BAW resonator 10.
To improve the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator 22, a coupler layer 36 is added between the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 as shown in
Equation (1) can be rewritten to express the displacement profile u(z) of the second overmode BAW resonator 22 including the coupler layer 36 as expressed in Equation (9):
where kp is the wavevector in the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 and kc is the wavevector in the coupler layer 36. Using displacement and stress continuity boundary conditions at z=±l, we obtain Equation (10):
Zp tan kpl=Zc tan kcl (10)
where Zp is the acoustic impedance of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 and Zc is the acoustic impedance of the coupler layer 36. The electromechanical energy Um of the second overmode BAW resonator 22 without the coupler layer 36 is expressed according to Equation (11):
and the electromechanical energy Um of the second overmode BAW resonator 22 with the coupler layer 36 is expressed according to Equation (12):
while a closed form solution to the elastic energy Ue is difficult because of the complex relationship between kc and kp, numerical methods can be used to solve the system of Equation (9) through Equation (12) to obtain the mode shapes u(z) and stress profile σ(z). Using u(z), we can calculate the electromechanical coupling using Equation (2) through Equation (5) to show that the coupler layer 36 increases the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator 22.
A relationship between the acoustic impedance (Zc) of the coupler layer 36 and the acoustic impedance (Zp) of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 may change the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator 22. A desirable electromechanical coupling coefficient may be achieved when the acoustic impedance of the coupler layer 36 divided by the acoustic impedance of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 (Zc/Zp) is greater than 1.0, greater than 1.5, greater than 2.0, and greater than 3.0 in various embodiments. Acoustic impedance of the coupler layer 36 divided by the acoustic impedance of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 (Zc/Zp) may be constrained by the acoustic impedance available for the material of the coupler layer 36, and thus may be less than 10.0, less than 8.0, and less than 6.0 in various embodiments. Further, a relationship between the thickness (2l) of the coupling layer 36 and the thickness (t) of the first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 may also change the electromechanical coupling coefficient. A desirable electromechanical coupling coefficient may be achieved when the thickness of the coupling layer 36 divided by the thickness of the first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 (2l/t) is between 0.1 and 0.4, and more specifically between 0.1 and 0.2, between 0.1 and 0.3, between 0.2 and 0.3, between 0.2 and 0.4, and between 0.3 and 0.4.
In one embodiment, the coupler layer 36 is a metal layer. The coupler layer 36 may be aluminum (Al), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), or osmium (Os). Depending on the material chosen for the coupler layer 36, a thickness of the coupler layer 36 may be modified to provide a desired acoustic response in order to increase the electromechanical coupling coefficient of the second overmode BAW resonator 22. For a coupler layer 36 with a thickness of 60 nm and a first piezoelectric layer 24 and second piezoelectric layer 26 of aluminum nitride (AlN) with a thickness of 700 nm, the acoustic impedance of the coupler layer 36 divided by the acoustic impedance of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 (Zc/Zp) for an aluminum (Al) coupler layer 36 is 0.50, for a molybdenum (Mo) coupler layer 36 is 1.90, for a tungsten (W) coupler layer 36 is 2.75, and for an osmium (Os) coupler layer 36 is 3.25. In various embodiments, a thickness of the first piezoelectric layer 24 and the second piezoelectric layer 26 may be 350 nm to 1050 nm, a thickness of the first electrode 28 and the second electrode 30 may be between 100 nm and 300 nm, and a thickness of the coupler layer 36 may be between 30 nm and 90 nm. A thickness of the coupler layer 36 may comprise any sub-range within this range, such that a thickness of the coupler layer 36 may be between 30 nm and 40 nm, between 30 nm and 50 nm, between 30 nm and 60 nm, between 30 nm and 70 nm, between 30 nm and 80 nm, between 40 nm and 50 nm, between 40 nm and 60 nm, between 40 nm and 70 nm, between 40 nm and 80 nm, between 40 nm and 90 nm, between 50 nm and 60 nm, between 50 nm and 70 nm, between 50 nm and 80 nm, between 50 nm and 90 nm, between 60 nm and 70 nm, between 60 nm and 80 nm, between 60 nm and 90 nm, between 70 nm and 80 nm, between 70 nm and 90 nm, and between 80 nm and 90 nm in various embodiments. Due to the excitation of a second order mode in the second overmode BAW resonator 22, the device may provide a resonant frequency greater than about 3.0 GHz. Accordingly, the second overmode BAW resonator 22 may be highly useful in high frequency applications.
The second overmode BAW resonator 22 may be a solidly mounted resonator (SMR) as shown in
The second overmode BAW resonator 22 may also be a thin-film bulk acoustic wave resonator (FBAR) as shown in
While not shown, the second overmode BAW resonator 22 may be used in any number of different supporting structures to create any number of different circuit topologies. In various embodiments, the second overmode BAW resonator 22 may be coupled either electrically or acoustically with one or more other resonators or components to form filtering circuitry such as duplexers, multiplexers, and the like. The details of these structures will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, and thus are not discussed herein.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/649,343, filed Mar. 28, 2018, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3731230 | Cerny, Jr. | May 1973 | A |
3875533 | Irwin et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4442434 | Baekgaard | Apr 1984 | A |
4577168 | Hartmann | Mar 1986 | A |
5291159 | Vale | Mar 1994 | A |
6067391 | Land | May 2000 | A |
6670866 | Ellaet al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6714099 | Hikita et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720844 | Lakin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6927649 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927651 | Larson, III | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975183 | Aigner | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7057478 | Korden et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7173504 | Larson, III et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7239067 | Komuro et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7321183 | Ebuchi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7342351 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7367095 | Larson, III et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7391285 | Larson, III et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7436269 | Wang et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7515018 | Handtmann et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7804374 | Brown et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7825749 | Thalhammer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855618 | Frank et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889024 | Bradley | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898493 | Rojas et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7956705 | Meister et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7973620 | Shirakawa et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8248185 | Choy et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8508315 | Jamneala et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8575820 | Shirakawa | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8576024 | Erb et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8923794 | Aigner | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8981627 | Sakuma et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8991022 | Satoh et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9054671 | Adkisson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9054674 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9197189 | Miyake | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9243316 | Larson, III | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9484883 | Nishizawa et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9698756 | Khlat et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9837984 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9847769 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9887686 | Kuwahara | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929716 | Lee et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10009001 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10141644 | Khlat et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20020109564 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040100342 | Nishihara et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050057117 | Nakatsuka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093648 | Inoue | May 2005 | A1 |
20050206476 | Ella et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060091978 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080007369 | Barber et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080169884 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080297278 | Handtmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090096549 | Thalhammer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096550 | Handtmann et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100277237 | Sinha et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110115334 | Konishi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121689 | Grannen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110204995 | Jamneala et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110210787 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120007696 | Pang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120187799 | Nakahashi | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120313725 | Ueda et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130033150 | Bardong et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130113576 | Inoue et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130193808 | Feng | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140132117 | Larson, III | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145557 | Tanaka | May 2014 | A1 |
20140167565 | Iwamoto | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150222246 | Nosaka | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150280100 | Burak | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369153 | Tsunooka et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160028364 | Takeuchi | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160056789 | Otsubo et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160191012 | Khlat et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191014 | Khlat et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191016 | Khlat et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160261235 | Ortiz | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160268998 | Xu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160308576 | Khlat et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160359468 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170093369 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093370 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170141757 | Schmidhammer | May 2017 | A1 |
20170201233 | Khlat | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170301992 | Khlat et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170324159 | Khlat | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170338795 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180013402 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180041191 | Park | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180076793 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180076794 | Khlat et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180109236 | Konoma | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180109237 | Wasilik et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180145658 | Saji | May 2018 | A1 |
20180219530 | Khlat et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180241418 | Takamine et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180358947 | Mateu et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190140618 | Takamine | May 2019 | A1 |
20190181835 | Timme et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190199320 | Morita et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190207583 | Miura et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190222197 | Khlat et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190288664 | Saji | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012257050 | Dec 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Jose Capilla et al., High-Acoustic-Impedance Tantalum Oxide Layers for Insulating Acoustic Reflectors, Mar. 2012, IEEE vol. 59, No. 3, 7 pages. (Year: 2012). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,587, dated Sep. 13, 2016, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,587, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,084, dated Jun. 12, 2017, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,651, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/275,957, dated Jun. 14, 2017, 9 pages. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/347,452, mailed Jun. 15, 2017, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/275,957, dated Jan. 2, 2018, 7 pages. |
Author Unknown, “SAW Filters—SAW Resonators: Surface Acoustic Wave SAW Components,” Product Specification, 2010, Token Electronics Industry Co., Ltd., 37 pages. |
Fattinger, Gernot et al., “Miniaturization of BAW Devices and the Impact of Wafer Level Packaging Technology,” Joint UFFC, EFTF and PFM Symposium, Jul. 21-25, 2013, Prague, Czech Republic, IEEE, pp. 228-231. |
Kwa, Tom, “Wafer-Level Packaged Accelerometer With Solderable SMT Terminals,” IEEE Sensors, Oct. 22-25, 2006, Daegu, South Korea, IEEE, pp. 1361-1364. |
Lakin, K. M., “Coupled Resonator Filters,” 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Oct. 8-11, 2002, Munich, Germany, 8 pages. |
López, Edén Corrales, “Analysis and Design of Bulk Acoustic Wave Filters Based on Acoustically Coupled Resonators,” PhD Thesis, Department of Telecommunications and Systems Engineering, Autonomous University of Barcelona, May 2011, 202 pages. |
Potter, Bob R. et al., “Embedded Inductors Incorporated in the Design of SAW Module SMT Packaging,” Proceedings of the 2002 Ultrasonics Symposium, Oct. 8-11, 2002, IEEE, pp. 397-400. |
Schneider, Robert, “High-Q AIN Contour Mode Resonators with Unattached, Voltage-Actuated Electrodes,” Thesis, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2015-247, Dec. 17, 2015, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2015/EECS-2015-247.html, Robert Anthony Schneider, 222 pages. |
Shirakawa, A. A., et al., “Bulk Acoustic Wave-Coupled Resonator Filters: Concept, Design, and Application,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 21, No. 5, Sep. 2011, 9 pages. |
Corrales, Eden, et al., “Design of Three-Pole Bulk Acoustic Wave Coupled Resonator Filters,” 38th European Microwave Conference, Oct. 2008, Amsterdam, Netherlands, EuMA, pp. 357-360. |
De Paco, Pedro, et al., “Equivalent Circuit Modeling of Coupled Resonator Filters,” Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 55, Issue 9, Sep. 2008, IEEE, pp. 2030-2037. |
Lakin, K. M., “Bulk Acoustic Wave Coupled Resonator Filters,” International Frequency Control Symposium, 2002, IEEE, pp. 8-14. |
Shirakawa, A. A., et al., “Bulk Acoustic Wave Coupled Resonator Filters Synthesis Methodology,” European Microwave Conference, Oct. 4-6, 2005, Paris, France, IEEE, 4 pages. |
Tosic, Dejan, et al., “Symbolic analysis of immitance inverters,” 14th Telecommunications Forum, Nov. 21-23, 2006, Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 584-487. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,651, dated May 8, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/347,428, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/490,381, dated May 23, 2018, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,651, dated Sep. 19, 2018, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/701,759, dated Oct. 4, 2018, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/727,117, dated Mar. 13, 2019, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,374, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/720,706, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/697,658, dated May 1, 2019, 13 pages. |
Larson, John, et al., “Characterization of Reversed c-axis AIN Thin Films,” International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, 2010, IEEE, pp. 1054-1059. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,374, dated Oct. 4, 2019, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,922, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,933, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/697,658, dated Oct. 22, 2019, 9 pages. |
Fattinger, Gernot et al., ““Single-to-balanced Filters for Mobile Phones using Coupled Resonator BAW Technology,”” 2004 IEEE International Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,and Frequency Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference, Aug. 23-27, 2004, IEEE, pp. 416-419. |
Lakin, K. M. et al., “High Performance Stacked Crystal Filters for GPS and Wide Bandwidth Applications,” 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Oct. 7-10, 2001, IEEE, pp. 833-838. |
Roy, Ambarish et al., “Spurious Modes Suppression in Stacked Crystal Filter,” 2010 IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference, May 7, 2010, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/003,417, dated Apr. 3, 2020, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,933, dated Oct. 23, 2020, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 16/003,417, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/358,823, dated Apr. 5, 2021, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,933, dated Mar. 29, 2021, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/740,667, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/776,738, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,166, dated Mar. 18, 2021, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,044, dated Nov. 12, 2020, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/697,658, dated Nov. 17, 2020, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/883,933, dated Dec. 31, 2020, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/740,667, dated Jun. 11, 2021, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/776,738, dated Jun. 11, 2021, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/806,166, dated Jun. 18, 2021, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190305752 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62649343 | Mar 2018 | US |