The present invention relates generally to bullet resistant barriers, and more particularly to such barriers that are portable.
There are many locations and situations where law enforcement/security personnel or others, such as workers in financial institutions, are regularly placed in harm's way. If the individuals are located in the same station everyday, that station may be equipped with bullet resistant properties to protect the occupant. However, in situations when the personnel must be mobile or move to various locations, it would be useful to have some bullet resistant barrier that could be moved with them. In addition, it would be useful for such a barrier to provide bullet resistant coverage to the personnel's entire body.
It is therefore a principal object and advantage of the present invention to provide a bullet resistant barrier that is movable.
It is a further object and advantage of the present invention to provide a bullet resistant barrier that provides protection to the entire body of an occupant.
It is an additional object and advantage of the present invention to provide a bullet resistant barrier that may be broken down for ease of transport.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will in part be obvious, and in part appear hereinafter.
In accordance with the foregoing objects and advantages, the present invention contemplates a barrier comprising a base unit composed of a bullet resistant material, such as metal, plastic, ceramic or a composite material, and a transparent upper wall removably interconnected to the base unit and composed of a bullet resistant material, such as a bullet resistant plastic or glass. The base unit includes a front wall and two side walls extending from the front wall to provide protection to the front and sides of a person standing behind the barrier. A series of casters, preferably locking casters, are attached to the bottom edges of the side walls, and a pair of handles are connected to each of the side walls permitting the barrier to be conveniently transported from one site to another.
A bracket assembly comprising first and second upstanding channel members interconnected by an S-shaped double channel member extending transversely there between serves to removably interconnect the upper wall to the base unit. The S-shaped member hooks over the upper edge of the front wall with its lower channel being positioned to receive the bottom edge of the upper wall. The two upstanding channel members are positioned at opposite ends of the S-shaped member and engage the opposite side edges of the upper wall. The upper wall may be slid into or out of engagement with this bracket assembly, thereby facilitating convenient break-down of the barrier.
The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated by reading the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout, there is seen in
Base unit 16 comprises a front wall 20 and two side walls 22, 24 which extend perpendicularly rearward from opposing side edges of front wall 20. A first pair of casters 26 are connected to the bottom edges of side walls 22, 24, and a second pair of casters 28 interconnected to one another by an axle 30 are pivotally attached to front wall 20 in order to be moveable into or out of engagement with the ground. A rod 32 and locking bar 34 may be used by “target” 12 to lock/unlock casters 28 and pivotally move them into or out of engagement with the ground (rod 32 may snap into bracket 36 mounted to the interior surface of side wall 24 to lock casters 28 in engaging relation with the ground). To assist in moving barrier 10, handles 38 are mounted to the exterior surfaces of side walls 22, 24 for grasping by the person moving the unit.
A bracket assembly is provided to interconnect upper wall 18 to base unit 16. The bracket assembly comprises an S-shaped member 40 that extends along a longitudinal axis and includes and upper channel member 42 that engages the upper edge of front wall 20, and a lower channel member 44 in which the bottom edge of upper wall 18 is positioned (alternatively, this member could simply comprise lower channel 44 attached to or integrally formed with front wall 20), as illustrated in
The present application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/160,079, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,849,781, filed on Jun. 8, 2005, which was a divisional of, and claimed priority to, Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10/243,508, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,811, filed on Sep. 14, 2002, which claimed priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/361,768 filed Mar. 5, 2002, the contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
772055 | Post | Oct 1904 | A |
1253964 | Hack | Jan 1918 | A |
1261518 | Hahre | Apr 1918 | A |
1274721 | Krzan | Aug 1918 | A |
1281400 | Larnell | Oct 1918 | A |
1327464 | Dewick et al. | Jan 1920 | A |
1465042 | Hruska | Aug 1923 | A |
1875488 | Peters | Sep 1932 | A |
2370596 | Wallace | Feb 1945 | A |
2613243 | Frear | Oct 1952 | A |
2845153 | West | Jul 1958 | A |
2878054 | Linder | Mar 1959 | A |
2937602 | Norris | May 1960 | A |
2985174 | Guth | May 1961 | A |
3039161 | Gagnon | Jun 1962 | A |
3590685 | Lane | Jul 1971 | A |
3712005 | Eschbach et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3942598 | Council | Mar 1976 | A |
3994243 | Anders | Nov 1976 | A |
4030219 | Donovan | Jun 1977 | A |
4061093 | Carstens et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4245546 | Chaires | Jan 1981 | A |
4351558 | Mueller | Sep 1982 | A |
4416485 | Long | Nov 1983 | A |
4674394 | Martino | Jun 1987 | A |
4781101 | Zevuluni et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4901964 | McConnell | Feb 1990 | A |
4949490 | Miller | Aug 1990 | A |
4953820 | Yoder | Sep 1990 | A |
5244172 | Allega | Sep 1993 | A |
5293807 | Hajdu | Mar 1994 | A |
5368904 | Stephinson | Nov 1994 | A |
5419479 | Evels et al. | May 1995 | A |
5438908 | Madden, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5560149 | Lafevre | Oct 1996 | A |
5641934 | Follett | Jun 1997 | A |
5666773 | Librande et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5703316 | Madden, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5829653 | Kaiser | Nov 1998 | A |
5857730 | Korpi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5878519 | Huyck et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5953820 | Vasudeva | Sep 1999 | A |
6000347 | Madden, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6116326 | Domina et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6170379 | Taylor | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6333085 | Emek | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6622607 | Miller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6907811 | White | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6962461 | Choi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7069680 | Crawford | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7104720 | Humphries et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128308 | Marsh et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7520207 | Fuqua et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7849781 | White | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7891283 | Kleniatis et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20030167911 | White | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040255769 | Drackett | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050265780 | Humphries et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000671 | Nolley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64291 | Feb 1892 | DE |
2412568 | Sep 1975 | DE |
462049 | Jan 1914 | FR |
2607238 | May 1988 | FR |
WO 2009048650 | Apr 2009 | MO |
WO 9429665 | Dec 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Attachment 1; 2 pages; pp. 9/14 and 11/14 with examiner's labeling of WO 94/29665. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/062692 filed May 5, 2008: International Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2009, 4 pages. |
“Defenshield, Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. Civil Docket,” in the United States District Court for The Northern District of New York—Main Office (Syracuse), Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, filed Sep. 22, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Complaint,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-CV-1140 (GTS/DEP), filed Sep. 22, 2010, 18 pages. |
“Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-1140, filed Sep. 22, 2010, 1 page. |
“First Amended Complaint,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, filed Sep. 29, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140 (GTS)(DEP), filed Oct. 25, 2010, 1 page. |
“Notice of Motion,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140 (GTS)(DEP), filed Oct. 25, 2010, 26 pages. |
“Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Transfer Venue,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140 (GTS)(DEP), filed Nov. 15, 2010, 77 pages. |
“First Choice Inc.'s and Diamondback Acquisition Co.'s Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss and Transfer Venue,” In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140 (GTS)(DEP), filed Nov. 22, 2010, 100 pages. |
“D-Back Acquisition Co. v. Defenshield, Inc. Civil Docket,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (Asheville), Case No. 1:10-cv-00266-MR, filed Nov. 10, 2010, 4 pages. |
“Complaint,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10 CV 266, filed Nov. 10, 2010, 60 pages. |
“Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations and Other Entities with a Direct Financial Interest in Litigation,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10 CV 00266, filed Nov. 10, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10 CV 266, filed Nov. 10, 2010, 1 page. |
“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Motion to Change Venue,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 01:10 CV 266, filed Dec. 6, 2010, 86 pages. |
“Rule 7.1 Statement of Defendant Defenshield Inc.,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10-CV-266, filed Dec. 6, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or to Change Venue,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10 CV 00266-MR, filed Dec. 23, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Order,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10-CV-00266, filed Jan. 24, 2011, 2 pages. |
“Order,” In the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Asheville Division, Case No. 1:10 CV 266, filed Aug. 15, 2011, 1 page. |
Exhibit A, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 24-1, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 4 pages. |
Exhibit B, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 24-2, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 8 pages. |
Exhibit C, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 24-3, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 10 pages. |
Exhibit D, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 24-4, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 3 pages. |
Exhibit E, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 24-5, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 4 pages. |
“Answer”, In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case no. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, document 24, filed Apr. 12, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint”, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 29-1, filed Jun. 13, 2012, 13 Pages. |
“Declaration of David L. Nocilly in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend”, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 29-2, filed Jun. 13, 2012, 30 pages. |
“Certificate of Service”, In the United Stated District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 29-3, Filed Jun. 13, 2012, p. 1. |
“Notice of Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint”, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 29, filed Jun. 13, 2012, 2 pages. |
“Confidentiality Order”, In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 30-1, Filed Jun. 15, 2012, 9 pages. |
Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. et al., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York—Main Office(Syracuse), Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 30, Filed Jun. 15, 2012, p. 1. |
“Certificate of Service” Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 32-1, Filed Jul. 9, 2012, p. 1. |
Defenshield, Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. et al., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 32, Filed Jul. 9, 2012, p. 1. |
Exhibit A, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-1, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 4 pages. |
Exhibit B, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-2, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 11 pages. |
Exhibit C, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-3, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 10 pages. |
Exhibit D, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-4, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 3 pages. |
Exhibit E, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-5, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 4 pages. |
“Certificate of Service”, In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34-6, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, p. 1. |
“Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint” In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 34, Filed Aug. 1, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Memorandum-Decision and Order”, In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 23, Filed Mar. 29, 2012, 29 pages. |
Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., Civil Case Mangagement Plan, In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 27, Filed May 23, 2012, pp. 8. |
“Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order”, In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 28, Filed May 29, 2012, pp. 23. |
“Confidentiality Order” In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 31, Filed Jun. 19, 2012, 9 pages. |
“Second Amended Complaint” In the United States District Court Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 33, Filed Jul. 11, 2012, 20 pages. |
“Joint Claim Construction Statement”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 35, Filed Oct. 19, 2012, pp. 1-10. |
“Defendant's Opening Markman Brief”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 36, Filed Dec. 3, 2012, pp. 1-38. |
“Plaintiff's Opening Markman Brief”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 37, Filed Dec. 3, 2012, pp. 1-18. |
“Declaration of David L. Nocilly”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 37-1, Filed Dec. 3, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
“Plaintiff's Responsive Markman Brief”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 38, Filed Jan. 2, 2013, pp. 1-13. |
“Defendant's Rebuttal Markman Brief”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 39, Filed Jan. 3, 2013, pp. 1-15. |
“Magistrate Judge Markman Report and Recommendation”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 40, Filed Jan. 8, 2013, pp. 1-19. |
“Defendants' Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation”, Defenshield Inc. v First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 41, Filed Mar. 22, 2013, pp. 1-10. |
“Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Response to Defendants' Objection”, Defenshield Inc. v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. and D-Back Acquisition Co., In the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case No. 5:10-cv-01140-GTS-DEP, Document 43, Filed Apr. 4, 2013, pp. 1-16. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110005377 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60361768 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10243508 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 11160079 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11160079 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12885794 | US |