Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6779821
-
Patent Number
6,779,821
-
Date Filed
Thursday, March 20, 200321 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, August 24, 200420 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 293 133
- 293 120
- 293 102
- 293 155
- 293 132
- 293 122
- 293 109
- 293 121
- 293 136
- 296 18709
- 296 20302
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A bumper arrangement for a vehicle comprises a bumper beam (17) fastened in two crash boxes (11, 12). The bumper beam (17) has a U-profile with a central flange (18) and two webs (19, 20) and has its opening towards the vehicle. The central flange has a recess (21) that is shallow at the mountings to the crash boxes (11, 12) and deepens therebetween so that the bumper beam will be so stiff that it will transfer substantial force to both crash boxes also in an off-set crash. This design makes the width of the part of the bumper beam adjacent the vehicle small.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a bumper arrangement for a vehicle, comprising a bumper beam fastened in two crash boxes.
STATE OF THE ART
The trend is towards lower fronts of passenger cars at the same time as the demands on the bumper arrangement become tougher.
OBJECT OF INVENTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
It is an object of the invention to provide an arrangement in which the bumper beam is fastened in crash boxes and is strong despite providing minimum hindrance for the air supply to the radiator. Another object is to provide an arrangement in which the bumper beam can transfer substantial force to both crash boxes also when it hits a barrier with only one side.
These objects are fulfilled in principle by a bumper beam that has a U-profile with a central flange and two webs and has its opening towards the vehicle, where the central flange of the profile has a recess that is shallow at its mountings to the crash boxes and deepens therebetween such that it is deeper than the webs for at least one third of the length between the mountings. The invention is defined by the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
shows an example of a bumper arrangement in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 2
is a section taken along the line
2
—
2
in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 3
is a section taken along the line
3
—
3
in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 4
is a perspective view of the bumper beam shown in
FIGS. 1-3
.
DESCRIPTION IN DETAIL OF THE ILLUSTRATED AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1
shows two crash boxes
11
,
12
fastened on the side rails
13
,
14
of a vehicle, for example a passenger car. A bumper beam
17
is mounted on the crash boxes. A mounting plate
15
on each crash box is fastened with screws to a corresponding end plate
16
on the side rail. The crash boxes can suitably be conical as shown, but they need not be circular.
As best shown in
FIG. 4
, which is a perspective drawing of the bumper beam, the ends of the bumper beam has a U-profile with a centre flange
18
and two webs or flanks
19
,
20
. As shown in
FIG. 2
, the centre flange has a groove or recess
21
that is shallow relative to the webs. On the inside of the crash boxes
11
,
12
, the depth of the groove
21
increases comparatively steeply until the groove reaches substantially below the level of the ends of the flanks
19
,
20
as can be seen in
FIGS. 1 and 4
and in the cross section shown as FIG.
3
. In a distance of more than half the distance between the inner edges of the mountings of the beam in the crash boxes, the groove
21
is so deep that it reaches below the level of the flank ends. The width of the bottom
22
of the groove is less than half the distance between the flanks
19
,
20
of the beam.
Since the groove
21
extends beyond the level of the edges of the flanks
19
,
20
, the bottom
22
of the groove will have the highest load at a crash, which reduces the load on the cut edges of the flanks. When they are not bent to form side flanges, the cut edges always involve a risk of crack initiation. Side flanges would impair the air flow past the bumper beam and the straight flanks in combination with the reduced width of the part of the beam that is adjacent the radiator (the width of the bottom
22
of the beam
21
) allows the air to flow past the bumper beam with a minimum of turbulence. On the parts of the bumper beam that do not disturb the air flow to the radiator and possible other devices such as the brakes, the bumper beam may have side flanges and it may then, if desirable, have the same strength in parts that do not have a deep groove as in the part that have a deep groove.
Since the bumper beam is stiff between its mountings, in a crash on one side of the bumper beam, for example on 40% of the bumper beam, a part of the load will be transmitted to the crash box on the other side, which reduces the risk of damages on the body in crashes in not too high a speed because both crash boxes will be deformed and take up energy.
Claims
- 1. A bumper arrangement for a vehicle, comprising a bumper beam (17) fastened in two crash boxes (11, 12), and two mountings for mounting the two crash boxes to a vehicle:characterised in that the bumper beam (17) has a U-profile with a central flange (18) and two webs (19, 20) and has its opening towards the vehicle, and the central flange has a recess (21) that is shallower than the webs at the mountings for the crash boxes (11, 12) and deepens therebetween such that it is deeper than the webs for at least one third of the length between the mountings.
- 2. The bumper arrangement according to claim 1, characterised in that the recess (21) is deeper than the webs (11, 12) for at least half the length between the mountings.
- 3. The bumper arrangement according to claim 1, characterised in that the bottom (22) of the recess (21) has a width that is less than half the distance between the webs (19, 20) of the profile.
- 4. The bumper arrangement according to claim 2, characterised in that the bottom (22) of the recess (21) has a width that is less than half the distance between the webs (19, 20) of the profile.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
0003696-2 |
Oct 2000 |
SE |
|
PCT Information
Filing Document |
Filing Date |
Country |
Kind |
PCT/SE01/02197 |
|
WO |
00 |
Publishing Document |
Publishing Date |
Country |
Kind |
WO02/30714 |
4/18/2002 |
WO |
A |
US Referenced Citations (26)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
19907783 |
Oct 1992 |
DE |
9920490 |
Apr 1999 |
WO |
0017017 |
Mar 2000 |
WO |