Bumper arrangement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6779821
  • Patent Number
    6,779,821
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 20, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 24, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A bumper arrangement for a vehicle comprises a bumper beam (17) fastened in two crash boxes (11, 12). The bumper beam (17) has a U-profile with a central flange (18) and two webs (19, 20) and has its opening towards the vehicle. The central flange has a recess (21) that is shallow at the mountings to the crash boxes (11, 12) and deepens therebetween so that the bumper beam will be so stiff that it will transfer substantial force to both crash boxes also in an off-set crash. This design makes the width of the part of the bumper beam adjacent the vehicle small.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to a bumper arrangement for a vehicle, comprising a bumper beam fastened in two crash boxes.




STATE OF THE ART




The trend is towards lower fronts of passenger cars at the same time as the demands on the bumper arrangement become tougher.




OBJECT OF INVENTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




It is an object of the invention to provide an arrangement in which the bumper beam is fastened in crash boxes and is strong despite providing minimum hindrance for the air supply to the radiator. Another object is to provide an arrangement in which the bumper beam can transfer substantial force to both crash boxes also when it hits a barrier with only one side.




These objects are fulfilled in principle by a bumper beam that has a U-profile with a central flange and two webs and has its opening towards the vehicle, where the central flange of the profile has a recess that is shallow at its mountings to the crash boxes and deepens therebetween such that it is deeper than the webs for at least one third of the length between the mountings. The invention is defined by the claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows an example of a bumper arrangement in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 2

is a section taken along the line


2





2


in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a section taken along the line


3





3


in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of the bumper beam shown in

FIGS. 1-3

.











DESCRIPTION IN DETAIL OF THE ILLUSTRATED AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENT





FIG. 1

shows two crash boxes


11


,


12


fastened on the side rails


13


,


14


of a vehicle, for example a passenger car. A bumper beam


17


is mounted on the crash boxes. A mounting plate


15


on each crash box is fastened with screws to a corresponding end plate


16


on the side rail. The crash boxes can suitably be conical as shown, but they need not be circular.




As best shown in

FIG. 4

, which is a perspective drawing of the bumper beam, the ends of the bumper beam has a U-profile with a centre flange


18


and two webs or flanks


19


,


20


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the centre flange has a groove or recess


21


that is shallow relative to the webs. On the inside of the crash boxes


11


,


12


, the depth of the groove


21


increases comparatively steeply until the groove reaches substantially below the level of the ends of the flanks


19


,


20


as can be seen in

FIGS. 1 and 4

and in the cross section shown as FIG.


3


. In a distance of more than half the distance between the inner edges of the mountings of the beam in the crash boxes, the groove


21


is so deep that it reaches below the level of the flank ends. The width of the bottom


22


of the groove is less than half the distance between the flanks


19


,


20


of the beam.




Since the groove


21


extends beyond the level of the edges of the flanks


19


,


20


, the bottom


22


of the groove will have the highest load at a crash, which reduces the load on the cut edges of the flanks. When they are not bent to form side flanges, the cut edges always involve a risk of crack initiation. Side flanges would impair the air flow past the bumper beam and the straight flanks in combination with the reduced width of the part of the beam that is adjacent the radiator (the width of the bottom


22


of the beam


21


) allows the air to flow past the bumper beam with a minimum of turbulence. On the parts of the bumper beam that do not disturb the air flow to the radiator and possible other devices such as the brakes, the bumper beam may have side flanges and it may then, if desirable, have the same strength in parts that do not have a deep groove as in the part that have a deep groove.




Since the bumper beam is stiff between its mountings, in a crash on one side of the bumper beam, for example on 40% of the bumper beam, a part of the load will be transmitted to the crash box on the other side, which reduces the risk of damages on the body in crashes in not too high a speed because both crash boxes will be deformed and take up energy.



Claims
  • 1. A bumper arrangement for a vehicle, comprising a bumper beam (17) fastened in two crash boxes (11, 12), and two mountings for mounting the two crash boxes to a vehicle:characterised in that the bumper beam (17) has a U-profile with a central flange (18) and two webs (19, 20) and has its opening towards the vehicle, and the central flange has a recess (21) that is shallower than the webs at the mountings for the crash boxes (11, 12) and deepens therebetween such that it is deeper than the webs for at least one third of the length between the mountings.
  • 2. The bumper arrangement according to claim 1, characterised in that the recess (21) is deeper than the webs (11, 12) for at least half the length between the mountings.
  • 3. The bumper arrangement according to claim 1, characterised in that the bottom (22) of the recess (21) has a width that is less than half the distance between the webs (19, 20) of the profile.
  • 4. The bumper arrangement according to claim 2, characterised in that the bottom (22) of the recess (21) has a width that is less than half the distance between the webs (19, 20) of the profile.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
0003696-2 Oct 2000 SE
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/SE01/02197 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO02/30714 4/18/2002 WO A
US Referenced Citations (26)
Number Name Date Kind
3831997 Myers Aug 1974 A
3997207 Norlin Dec 1976 A
4252355 Goupy et al. Feb 1981 A
5154462 Carpenter Oct 1992 A
5219197 Rich et al. Jun 1993 A
5290079 Syamal Mar 1994 A
5441319 Oyama et al. Aug 1995 A
5722708 Jonsson Mar 1998 A
5803517 Shibuya Sep 1998 A
6042163 Reiffer Mar 2000 A
6179353 Heatherington et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179355 Chou et al. Jan 2001 B1
6299226 Kroning et al. Oct 2001 B1
6318775 Heatherington et al. Nov 2001 B1
6364384 Kemp et al. Apr 2002 B1
6398275 Hartel et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406081 Mahfet et al. Jun 2002 B1
6435579 Glance Aug 2002 B1
6554345 Jonsson Apr 2003 B2
6609740 Evans Aug 2003 B2
6663150 Evans Dec 2003 B1
6669251 Trappe Dec 2003 B2
6669252 Roussel et al. Dec 2003 B2
20010017473 Yamamoto Aug 2001 A1
20030155782 Iino Aug 2003 A1
20030222477 Yoshida et al. Dec 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
19907783 Oct 1992 DE
9920490 Apr 1999 WO
0017017 Mar 2000 WO