Bundle breaker improvement

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6655566
  • Patent Number
    6,655,566
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 28, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 2, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
An improvement in a bundle breaker having first and second adjacent but longitudinally spaced upper and lower clamping surfaces for breaking progressively a bundle of sheets along a weakened plane from a log. The improvement includes first and second compliance structures positioned between the first and second upper and lower clamping surfaces. The first and second compliance structures include a device for detecting the height of the log and a variation setting device for reducing the distance between the upper and lower clamping surface a selected increment after detecting the height of the log. The compliance structures preferably include fluid pressurized structures which not only detect the height of the highest log when a plurality of logs in side by side relation are broken simultaneously but also apply even pressures to all of the logs and bundles during clamping and breaking even though one or more may have different heights.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to an improvement in machines, commonly referred to as bundle breakers or bundle separators, which separate a plurality of stacked sheets, hereafter a bundle, from a plurality of stacked sheets, hereafter referred to as a log. Each sheet is divided by one or more weakened lines and each log is divided by one or more weakened planes. Bundle breakers in the corrugated board industry are typically located in a production line between a sheet stacker on the upstream side and a load former which arranges the bundles in pallet loads on the downstream side.




A wide variety of products are manufactured in elongated sheets and divided into smaller segments as by scoring, indenting, nicking, tabbing or punching; creating weakened planes in the material. Such products include composition house roofing shingles, glass plates, paper, plastic, and corrugated board used in constructing boxes and packaging material




Early machines in the above designated categories, separated small segments from a larger sheet. Examples include: Olsen U.S. Pat. No. 1,669,999, 1928 for composition shingle; Stolar, U.S. Pat. No. 1,171,769, 1939, paper sheet; Zellers, U.S. Pat. No. 3,286,89, glass sheet; Dryon, U.S. Pat. No. 3,517,869, 1970, glass sheet using tilting table; Norton, U.S. Pat. No. 3,658,220, 1972, cardboard sheet; Barozzi, U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,195 1991; and Vossen, U.S. Pat. No. 4,171,081, 1979, cardboard sheet.




As the speed of machines creating long strips of sheet material increased and the advantages of arranging the sheet material into stacks became apparent, machines were developed for separating a plurality of sheets or a bundle from the stack of sheets or log. Each log was separated into a plurality of bundles. Separation, was effected by aligning the weakened planes of each sheet into a single vertical plane. The first machines, such as Schmidt, U.S. Pat. No. 4,136,604, 1979 applied clamps on either side of the weakened plane and effected separation of the bundles from the log by applying force downwardly on the bundle side of the weakened plane. This method required tremendous punching force since all of the sheets were essentially separated at the same time. The use of high force as used by Schmidt compressed and often damaged the cardboard sheets in the separation process.




Lucas, U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,022, 1985 introduced progressive tearing force along the weakened plane thereby reducing the punching force of Schmidt and reducing damage to the cardboard.




Fernandez, U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,358, 1999 introduced progressive tearing in a cardboard bundle by maintaining the bundle and log in a horizontal plane and pivoting the bundle about a vertical axis away from the log.




Vanhoutte, of Brugge Belgium, European patent 292 067, 1994, application published 1988, patented a cardboard bundle breaker which progressively severed the cardboard bundle from the log by pivoting the bundle portion downward about a horizontal pivot axis.




Pallmac , of Brugge, Belgian, installed a bundle breaker of cardboard sheets in Sanger, Calif. USA in 1994. The Pallmac machine progressively severed the cardboard bundle from the log by pivoting the bundle portion downward about a horizontal pivot axis.




Duecker, U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,582 was granted U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,582 in 1999 on a patent application filed Aug. 5, 1997 which did not cite the Pallmac bundle breaker, supra or the Vanhoutte bundle breaker supra. Duecker progressively severed the cardboard bundle from the log by pivoting the bundle portion upward about a horizontal pivot axis.




Shill, U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,267, in 2000 progressively separated a bundle from a log by progressively tearing the bundle starting at a point and pivoting the bundle along an X and a Y plane. By progressively simultaneously tearing along two planes, the clamping force required to hold the cardboard bundles was further reduced.




In order to speed production, Pallmac, 1994, e.g. feeds two or more logs through its bundle breaker and severs a plurality of bundles simultaneously from the side by side logs. One of the problems associated with breaking multiple bundles from multiple logs is that one or more logs may be higher than the others due to a miscount in the number of sheets or the accidental insertion of scrap pieces of material between one or more sheets of the log. It is sometimes possible that where there are three or more logs, all may have different heights.




When both top and bottom surfaces of the clamps are rigid, more pressure is exerted on the taller logs which can damage compressible material like corrugated cardboard. If the logs are not compressible, then insufficient pressure is placed on the shorter logs and shifting of the logs can occur when the bundles are broken off from the log either by pivoting the bundle about a horizontal or vertical axis or a combination of both. In the industry, this problem is called a “lack of compliance” problem; i.e. the force on all the side by side logs is not substantially equal.




To solve the lack of compliance problem some companies have inserted spring material such as foam between the face of the rigid clamp and the logs. Springs and foam rubber do not distribute the clamp force evenly between side by side logs. Springs and foam materials increase pressure with displacement.




Pallmac sought to solve the compliance problem by placing a small diameter elongated air bag below the rigid lifting members near the break line of the bundle breaker and at right angles to the direction of flow of the material.




Pallmac uses a plurality of narrow spaced apart conveyor belts and lifting members which are located between each belt. The Pallmac air bag is part of the lifting mechanism. Before a bundle can be broken from a log, the lifting mechanism must lift the log up into engagement with the upper hard vertically adjustable fixed clamp. Since the length of the log often exceeds the length of the lifting members, the portion of the log hanging off the end of the lifting members will no longer be horizontal. As the lifting members lower the log, a shifting of the individual sheets within the log can occur which changes the position of the weakened plane and can result in failure to break the bundle cleanly from the log or produce poorly formed bundles. As the variation in the logs increase, the upper hard vertically adjustable clamp needs to be adjusted upward, which increases the shifting effect of the individual sheets.




Siebels, provided vibration damping in a vibratory table for separating sheets of glass which have become stuck to one another in an annealing process by providing an air bag


62


(see FIG.


3


). This use of an air bag has no relevance in solving the compliance problem when logs of uneven height are to be broken.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The essence of the invention is the provision of a fluid pressure compliance structure to provide reliable breaking of multiple side-by side bundles from multiple side by side logs by applying equal pressure to all of the logs and severed bundles.




Wherever the words “fluid pressure” are used in this application, the word “fluid” includes liquid as well as gas. Liquids may include water or other fluids. The word “gas” includes air as well as other gases. Applicants found that air is the preferred fluid for applications in the corrugated board industry.




It is an object of the present invention to provide a compliance structure which can be used in breaking bundles from logs which are composed of sheets of corrugated board.




It is a further object to provide a device which can also be used in breaking sheets of different materials arranged in logs such as glass, roof shingle materials made from various composition materials, sheets of plastic arranged in logs, and other sheet material formed in stacks in which the logs contain one or more weakened planes.




It is a further object of the present invention that the compliance structure having a fluid inflated structure be used in bundle breakers in which the downstream clamp member pivots about a horizontal axis and the bundle is pivoted upwardly as in the Duecker U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,592 patent.




It is a further object of the present invention that the compliance structure have a fluid inflated structure and in which the downstream clamp pivots about a vertical axis as shown in the Fernandez U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,358 patent.




It is still another object of the present invention that the compliance structure have a fluid inflated structure and in which the downstream clamp pivots about an X-Y axis as shown in the Shill U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,267 patent.




A major feature of the present invention is a structure which can easily detect and transmit the information that the first compliance structure has touched the highest log adjacent the bundle breaking plane.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of an example bundle breaking machine incorporating the structure of the present invention. To illustrate the operation of the machine and the inventive structure, two side by side bundles of sheet materials processed by the machine have been broken from a stack of sheets, hereafter referred to as logs, and the bundles have been transferred to a downstream portion of the machine. The remainder portion of two logs have been positioned on a precise portion of the machine ready for breaking. The machine is positioned prior to movement to a clamping position. Portions of the machine have been removed to more clearly view and understand the structure of the present invention. For illustrating the unique features of the structure of the present invention, the overall heights of the severed bundle and the remainder log on the right side of the machine as viewed from rear upstream end of the machine are greater than the heights of the severed bundle and the remainder log on the left side of the machine. This disparity in the heights of the stacks on the right and left side is continued in all of the illustrations where product is present. This height disparity is for illustrative purposes only, and in most instances, the heights of the stacks will normally be the same or substantially the same as further discussed in the specification. As previously stated, more than two logs may be severed and all of the logs and bundles could have different heights.





FIG. 2

is a side view on an enlarged scale of the example machine illustrated in FIG.


1


. The positioning of the machine, the structure of the present invention, and the processed severed bundles and the logs awaiting separation of further bundles are the same as illustrated in FIG.


1


. Careful inspection reveals that the height of the severed bundle and the height of the remainder log on the far side of the machine are greater than the severed bundle and remainder log on the near side of the machine.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of the same machine illustrated in

FIG. 1

taken from a different view angle. The view is from a point from the upstream side and from below the machine looking toward the downstream side and up into the structure. This view more clearly shows the structure which is the subject of the present invention. The positioning of the various parts of the machine, the structure of the present invention and the placement of the severed bundles and the positioning of the remainder logs ready for severing is identical to the positionings illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

.





FIG. 4

is an enlarged end view taken from the upstream end of the machine illustrated in

FIG. 3

looking toward the downstream end, showing the downstream ends of the remainder logs. The position of the parts of the machine, the invention and the logs is identical to the positionings in all of the previous drawing Figures. In viewing the two remainder logs, it is more readily apparent that the height of the remainder log on the right side of the machine, as viewed, is higher than the remainder log on the left side.





FIG. 5

is a perspective view of the same machine and structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 1

taken from the same view angle. The rigid members of the machine have been moved into initial, preset pressure, touch engagement with the severed bundle having a greater height and the remainder log having a greater height. Portions of air hoses which are also part of the structure of the present invention have been illustrated in this Figures for further clarification of the structure of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a side view on an enlarged scale of the example machine illustrated in FIG.


5


. The positioning of the machine, the structure of the present invention, and the processed severed bundles and the remainder logs awaiting separation of further bundles are the same as illustrated in FIG.


5


. On close inspection, it may be seen that some of the rigid members are in preset pressure touching contact with the severed bundle and the remainder log on the far side of the machine which have a greater height, but no rigid members are in contact with the severed bundle and the remainder log on the near side of the machine which has a lower height. Stabilizer chains which are part of the machines have been added in this view. These chains are part of the mechanism to keep the downstream clamping means parallel to the plane of the load carrying belts during vertical movement of the clamping means relative to the load carrying belts and also during conjoint pivoting movement of the clamping means and the load carrying belts. The heavy vertical parallel lines indicate the positioning of chains which are also part of the mechanism to maintain parallel movement of the parts of the machine just described. A rack gear has been illustrated in this view to illustrate part of the clamp raising and lowering mechanism to keep the upstream clamping means parallel in the cross machine direction. Roller tracking a vertical plane (not shown) keep the upstream clamping means parallel in the through machine direction.





FIG. 7

is a perspective view of the machine and structure of the present invention taken from the same view angle as in FIG.


3


. The positioning of the parts of the machine and structure of the present invention is the same as illustrated in

FIGS. 5 and 6

.





FIG. 8

is an enlarged end view taken from the upstream end of the machine illustrated in

FIG. 7

looking toward the downstream and showing the upstream ends of the remainder logs. The position of the parts of the machine, the structure of the present invention and the remainder logs is identical to the positionings in the previous drawing

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


. The effect of the greater height of the remainder log on the right side of the machine is now readily apparent. Some of the rigid members on the right side of the machine are now in contact with the top of the remainder log on the right side of the machine which has a greater height, while the rigid members on the left side of the machine are not yet in contact with the remainder log of less height on the left side of the machine.





FIG. 9

is a perspective view of the machine including the structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 5

taken from the same vantage point. The parts of the machine, however, have now moved to a position of full clamping force on both severed bundles and both remainder logs.





FIG. 10

is a side view of the machine and structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 9

on an enlarged scale. On close analysis it may be seen that only a slight movement has taken place in the upper portion of the machine but now all bundles and remainder logs are fully engaged by the structure which is the subject of this invention.





FIG. 11

is a perspective view of the machine including the structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 7

taken from the same vantage point. The positioning of the parts of the machine and structure of the present invention is the same as illustrated in

FIGS. 9 and 10

.





FIG. 12

is an enlarged end view taken from the upstream end of the machine illustrated in

FIG. 11

looking toward the downstream end and showing the upstream ends of the remainder logs. The position of the parts of the machine, the structure of the present invention and the remainder logs is identical to the positionings in the previous drawing

FIGS. 9

,


10


, and


11


. The effect of the greater height of the remainder log on the right side of the machine is now readily apparent on the structure of the present invention. Some of the rigid members on the right side of the machine are now in contact with the top of the remainder log on the right side of the machine which has a greater height, while some of the rigid members on the left side of the machine are in contact with the remainder log of less height on the left side of the machine. The outside rigid members are in the maximum lowered position, four of the rigid members on the right side which are in contact with the remainder log on the right side are in a higher position, and four of the rigid members on the left in contact with the left remainder log are in a somewhat lower position than the position of the rigid members in contact with the right side remainder log.





FIG. 13

is a perspective view of the machine including the structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 9

taken from the same vantage point. The parts of the machine, however, have now tilted about a horizontal axis to a position in which two side by side bundles have been severed from the two side by side logs.





FIG. 14

is a side view of the machine and structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 13

on an enlarged scale. It may be seen that both side by side severed bundles and both side by side remainder logs have been cleanly severed respectively from one another. It also may be noted that all four of the severed bundles are now riding on the pivoted portion of the machine and that the sheet stacks remain in straight stacks without appreciable fanning of the sheets.





FIG. 15

is a perspective view of the machine including the structure of the present invention shown in

FIG. 13

taken from a different vantage point. The positioning of the parts of the machine and structure of the present invention is the same as illustrated in

FIGS. 13 and 14

.





FIG. 16

is an enlarged end view taken from the upstream end of the machine illustrated in

FIG. 15

looking toward the downstream end and showing the upstream ends of the remainder logs. The position of the parts of the machine, the structure of the present invention and the remainder logs is identical to the positionings in the previous drawing

FIGS. 13

,


14


, and


15


. The positioning of the rigid members with respect to the remainder logs remain the same as illustrated in FIG.


14


.





FIG. 17

is a reduced scale view of the machine and structure of the present invention illustrated in

FIG. 8

except that the rigid members and their supporting structure is slightly raised above the top sheets of both remainder logs.





FIG. 18

is an enlarged scale view of a portion of the structure of the present invention taken in the vicinity of the arrow labeled “FIG.


18


” in

FIG. 17. A

portion of the flexible member of the structure of the present invention is clearly shown as well as the structure for limiting the maximum extension and contraction of the stringer members as well as the range of side to side movement.





FIG. 19

is a reduced scale view of the machine and structure of the present invention similar to the view illustrated in

FIG. 17

except that the structure of the present invention has been lowered to firmly contact the remainder logs.





FIG. 20

is an enlarged scale view of a portion of the structure of the present invention taken in the vicinity of the arrow labeled “FIG.


20


” in FIG.


19


. The position of the portions of the machine and portions of the structure of the present invention is identical to the positions shown in FIG.


19


.




The end rigid member is lowered to its maximum extension; the next four rigid members engaging the higher remainder stack are moved to their maximum contracted position; the next four rigid members in engagement with the shorter remainder stack are slightly lower than the rigid members in contact with the higher remainder log; and the rigid member to the far left is lowered to its maximum extension.





FIG. 21

is an enlarged perspective view of the machine and structure of the present invention similar to the view illustrated in

FIG. 1

except that the bundles and remainder logs have been removed for purposes of clarity.





FIG. 22

is a reduced scale side view of the machine and structure of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


21


. The position of all of the elements of the machine and structure of the present invention are identical to the positions of FIG.


21


.





FIG. 23

is a reduced scale view of the upstream end of the machine and structure of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


21


. The position of the parts of the machine and structure of the present invention is identical the position shown in FIG.


21


.





FIG. 24

is an exploded perspective view of the structure of the present invention removed from the machine illustrated in FIG.


1


and rotated clockwise about 90°. The pinion gears of the nip adjustment mechanism have been removed for clarity.





FIG. 25

is an enlarged scale side view of the reassembled parts illustrated in FIG.


24


.





FIG. 26

is an enlarged scale top view of the assembled portion of the structure of the present invention with one of the pinion gears removed and the other pinion gear shown and engaged with one of the gear racks.





FIG. 27

is an end view of the structure of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


26


.





FIG. 28

is an enlarged perspective view of the assembled structure of the present invention illustrated in

FIG. 24

rotated counterclock wise about 90°.




One of the pinion gears of the nip adjustment mechanism of the machine has been removed.





FIG. 29

is a reduced scale exploded perspective view of a portion of the machine and the structure of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


28


.




Portions of the structure of the present invention have been disassembled to clarify the structure of the present invention.





FIG. 30

is an exploded perspective view of the machine and structure of the present invention illustrated in

FIG. 29

, but as viewed from a point below the structure.





FIG. 31

is an enlarged perspective view of the assembled structure of the present invention illustrated in FIG.


29


. The pinion gears of the nip adjustment mechanism shown in

FIG. 29

are not shown.





FIG. 32

is a reduced perspective view of the portions of the structure illustrated in

FIG. 31

but with portions of the structure removed. The views is from a point located below the structure shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 33

is an end view of a cross section of the structure of the present invention taken along a plane through line


33


of

FIG. 31

in the direction of the arrows.





FIG. 34

is a side view of a cross sectional view taken along a plane through line


34





34


of

FIG. 31

in the direction of the arrows.





FIG. 35

is an enlarged scale detail view of a portion of the structure of the present invention taken in the vicinity of the broken line indicated by the arrow designated

FIG. 35

shown in FIG.


34


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is an improvement in a bundle breaker


1


for separating bundles


2


from a log


4


having a generally planar top surface


5


. Log


4


consists of a plurality of sheets


6


each having a generally planar top surface


7


and each sheet is formed with at least one weakened line


8


. Weakened lines


8


are vertically aligned in log


4


forming a weakened plane


9


in log


4


. The present invention can be used with a number of different bundle breakers; one of which is shown in the drawings for illustrative purposes. Other types of bundle breakers in which the improvement may be used are set forth in the background of the invention. Example bundle breaker


1


includes a first conveyor


10


for conveying log


4


and has an upstream end


11


for receiving log


4


and a downstream end


12


.




A second conveyor


13


has an upstream end


14


positioned immediately adjacent to downstream end


12


of first conveyor


10


providing a gap therebetween defining a bundle breaking plane


15


.




Bundle breaker


1


includes first clamp means


16


mounted for vertical reciprocating movement above first conveyor


10


, and second clamp means


17


mounted above second conveyor


13


for vertical reciprocating movement in relation to second conveyor


13


. Second conveyor


13


and second clamp means


17


are mounted for conjoint pivotal movement in relation to bundle breaking plane


15


for progressively breaking a bundle


2


from log


4


along weakened plane


9


in log


4


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the improvement includes a first compliance structure


20


mounted on first clamp means


16


. First compliance structure


20


includes: a first fluid pressurized structure


21


as shown in

FIGS. 1

,


21


, and


24


having a first flexible member


22


, shown in

FIGS. 18

,


20


,


29


, and


30


, presenting a first engagement area


23


as shown in

FIG. 2

for operative engagement with an upstream portion


24


of the generally planar top surface


5


of log


4


and on the upstream side of weakened plane


9


in log


4


.




The improvement further includes: a second compliance structure


26


mounted on second clamp means


17


. The second compliance structure


26


includes a second fluid pressurized structure


27


having a second flexible member


28


presenting a second engagement area


29


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, for operative engagement with a downstream portion


30


of generally planar top surface


5


of log


4


. Second fluid pressurized structure


27


is located on the downstream side of weakened plane


9


in log


4


.




Preferably, first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


have a width sufficient to simultaneously engage a plurality of logs


4


and


4


′ in side by side relation. This enables greater production speed. The present invention can reliably process a plurality of side by side logs


4


and


4


′ which are of substantially equal height and can even process a plurality of side by side logs


4


and


4


′ when one or any number of logs have a different height.




The difference in stack height may be caused by a miscount of the sheets in one or more logs or a piece of scrap material may become lodged between one or more sheets of one or more logs.




The difference in stack height that the present machine can process depends on the preset maximum and minimum designed into the first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


; and the amount of force that can be exerted on the log


4


without damaging the sheets


6


and still maintain the log


4


securely between first clamp means


16


and first conveyor


10


and second clamp means


17


and second conveyor


13


during the bundle breaking operation.




Preferably, bundle breaker


1


, as illustrated in

FIGS. 21 and 24

, is constructed so that first and second flexible members


22


and


28


in first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


each have a width which extends substantially the width of logs


4


and


4


′ and are in close proximity to weakened plane


9


in log


4


.




In order to achieve reliable bundle breaking with a minimum fanning of the sheets in the log as well as a minimum of fanning of the sheets in the bundle broken from the log during the bundle breaking and conveying process, the improvement for bundle breaker


1


is preferably constructed in the following manner.




First and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


, as illustrated in

FIG. 29

are each formed with a generally planar upper rigid wall


38


affixed to first and second clamp means


16


and


17


. A depending perimeter wall


45


is affixed to and extends downwardly respectively from each generally planar upper rigid wall


38


of first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


.




First and second flexible members


22


and


28


are joined to respective perimeter walls


45


in pressure sealing engagement therewith and first and second engagement areas


23


and


29


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, of first and second flexible members


22


and


28


each present a substantially planar unbroken surface area with infinite indentation flexibility upon the application of forces to any portion of the substantially planar unbroken surface areas.




Preferably the improvement in bundle breaker


1


includes means for varying the pressure in each of the first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


. This feature is particularly valuable in providing compliance ability where there are a plurality of side by side logs


4


and


4


′ which is discussed in greater detail below.




A further improvement in bundle breaker


1


of the present invention includes: a plurality of first and second rigid members


33


and


34


, shown for example in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


3


, operatively engaged by the first and second flexible members


22


and


28


and having generally flat portions


35


and


36


for engaging logs


4


and


4


′. These rigid members may be preferably made of wood, metal, plastic, composites, or other relatively rigid materials.




The terms “rigid member”


33


and


34


, as used in the specification and claims, is a short hand term and does not mean they are absolutely rigid. Since the rigid members are made of wood, plastic, light gauge steel or composites, they can and do bend under certain loads. In fact, rigid members


33


and


34


may be coated with rubber and high friction materials or a thin layer of rubber may be bonded to the under surface


35


to minimize slippage between the under surface


35


as shown in

FIG. 30

of the rigid members


33


and


34


and the top surface


5


of log


4


.




As shown in the drawings such as

FIG. 3

, first and second rigid members


33


and


34


extend generally in the longitudinal direction of log


4


.




Another feature of the improvement in the present invention is shown incorporated in the bundle breaker


1


, shown for example, in

FIGS. 32 and 33

incorporated in first compliance structure


20


. A first limiting means


37


limiting the vertical movement of the first and second plurality of rigid members


33


and


34


is illustrated in FIG.


29


and is discussed further below.




The weakened plane


9


of logs


4


and


4


′ must be rather precisely located on the bundle breaking plane


15


as shown in FIG.


14


.




A squaring gate may be used to straighten the sheets


6


in log


4


before it reaches the bundle breaker


1


, but the computer used to control first and second conveyors


10


and


13


can precisely stop the log


4


with the weakened plane


9


of the log


4


on the bundle breaking plane


15


as shown in FIG.


2


.




Various belting materials rubberized on both sides to reduce air leakage and reinforced with various strand materials have been successfully tested. The belting selected must be relatively non stretchable, yet be compliant. As an example, applicants have found that a two ply belting with rubber on both sides manufactured by Hoffmeyer Company, Inc. of San Leandro, Calif. gives satisfactory results.




Referring to

FIGS. 24-33

, the improvement of the present invention for various bundle breakers such as bundle breaker


1


illustrated is further described as follows:.




First limiting means


37


, previously mentioned above, includes a generally planar upper rigid wall


38


having a strength sufficient to maintain a generally planar surface during maximum clamping force.




First limiting means


37


further includes a plurality of first C-shaped members


39


, (see FIG.


33


), arranged in parallel separated positions parallel to rigid members


33


which are attached to planar upper rigid wall


38


. First limiting means


37


also includes a plurality of second C-shaped members


40


which interlock with first C-shaped members


39


; and each of the rigid members


33


are individually attached to one of the second C-shaped members


40


. The purpose of this structure is to provide compliance as described below.




Second limiting means, not shown, is a part of second compliance structure


26


shown in

FIG. 3

, and is constructed in the same manner as first limiting means


37


which is a part of first compliance structure


20


shown in FIG.


29


. Because the construction of second limiting means is identical to that of first limiting means


37


, it is not repeated for purposes of brevity.




As shown in the drawings, particularly

FIGS. 4

,


8


,


12


,


16


,


18


, and


20


, there may be a miscount in the logs


4


and


4


′ in which case there may be more sheets in one log than the other, or there may be a piece of scrap that has lodged between the sheets in one stack which would make it higher than the other. As shown particularly in

FIG. 20

, log


4


′ is higher than log


4


.




In order to break two bundles simultaneously from logs


4


and


4


′, in which log


4


′ is higher than log


4


, a minimum selected pressure must be applied to both logs to keep the stacks of sheets


6


and


6


′ constituting the logs


4


and


4


′ from shifting during the breaking step when the second clamp means


17


is pivoted in relation to the first clamp means


16


. It is also important that a substantially greater pressure than this minimum selected pressure not be applied to the taller stack of corrugated board or log to prevent crushing of the sheets in the taller stack. In other words, the object of this invention is to apply the same pressure to both logs even if one log is higher than the other log.




The structure for attaining the objective of applying equal pressure is discussed below. Using the present invention, where pressure is regulated, requires a different procedure in setting up and operating the machine as follows.




The operator programs a computer to pressurize the fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


to about 1 to 5 PSI. Logs


4


and


4


′ are then moved by first conveyor


10


while the first and second clamp means


16


and


17


are in the raised position as illustrated in FIG.


4


. When the weakened plane


9


of logs


4


and


4


′ reach the bundle breaking plane


15


as illustrated in

FIG. 6

, forward movement of the logs is stopped. The computer then lowers first and second clamp means


16


and


17


until the plurality of first and second rigid members


33


and


34


are just above the top surfaces


5


and


5


′ of logs


4


and


4


′, see for example FIG.


18


. The computer then continues to lower, without pausing, the plurality of first and second rigid members


33


and


34


until the generally flat portions


35


and


36


(see

FIGS. 3 and 18

) of first and second rigid members


33


and


34


touch the top surface of the tallest log


4


′.




As illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the tallest log is log


4


′. As flat portion


35


touches log


4


′, the computer will sense the increase in pressure in first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


. The computer then continues to lower the first and second pressurized structures


21


and


27


an additional preselected incremental distance known as a “variation setting”. Where the variation potential in the first and second C-shaped members


39


and


40


is ¾″, the variation setting can be any distance between 0″ and ¾″. The variation potential may be different for different fluid pressurized structures.




For the amount of initial pressure to apply to the first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


, the operator must make a judgment which is dependent on the amount of material to be severed and the characteristics of the material to be severed.




As to the variation setting, i.e., how far to lower the first and second fluid pressure structures


21


and


27


after initial contact, the operator must select a variation setting distance which will apply the least pressure on the logs


4


and


4


′ while still being able to achieve breaking of the logs


4


and


4


′ into bundles




For example, the operator must take into account the width and height of a single log


4


to be severed or the width and height of a plurality of logs


4


′ to be severed. The operator will also have to take into account the physical characteristics of the logs and the type of nicks creating the weakened lines in the sheets.




Sheets of roof composition matter, glass, plastics, and corrugated board will require different clamping pressures and different variation settings. Sheets of corrugated board will vary in physical characteristics and hence require different clamping pressures and variation settings




Corrugated board which has a high moisture content, or is made of a high percentage of recycled fiber will require different pressure and variation settings. On the other hand, corrugated board with less recycled fiber will require different pressure and variation settings. A pressure of about 1 to 5 p.s.i. and a potential variation distance of 0″ to about ¾″ is suitable for corrugated board.




In

FIGS. 12 and 20

full clamping pressure for the particular product being severed has been applied. The logs


4


and


4


′ are ready to be severed and the plurality of first and second rigid members


33


and


34


assume different positions as illustrated. As an example, and as best illustrated in

FIG. 20

the plurality of first rigid members


33


have been individually numbered with given numbers


46


-


55


. Reading from right to left, rigid member


46


is not touching any part of log


4


′ and thus it is fully extended downwardly to its designed position. Note that upper horizontal flange


57


of second C-shaped member


40


connected to rigid member


46


is engaged with the lower horizontal flange


58


of first C-shaped member


39


.




Rigid members


47


-


50


are either partially or fully engaging top surface


5


′ of log


4


′ and clamping pressure is being applied. Note that all of the rigid members


47


-


50


are at their maximum height and are restrained by upper horizontal flange


57


of second C-shaped member


40


engaging upper horizontal flange


59


of first C-shaped member


39


.




Typically, it is not recommended that maximum variation setting be applied which would cause the horizontal flanges


57


of second C-shaped members


40


to touch upper horizontal flanges


59


of first C-shaped member


39


. Further clamping travel could cause some of the plurality of rigid members


33


and


34


to exert unequal pressure on logs


4


and


4


′.




Referring to

FIG. 20

, rigid members


51


-


54


are either partially or fully in engagement with top surface


5


of log


4


which has a lower elevation than the top surface


5


′ of log


4


′. Provided upper flanges


57


are not touching upper flanges


59


, the pressure in first fluid pressurized structure


21


is even throughout and the pressure exerted by each of the rigid members


47


-


54


on logs


4


and


4


′ will be the same. Note that rigid members


51


-


54


on log


4


are lower because log


4


is not as high as log


4


′. Rigid members


51


-


54


are not at either their maximum or minimum range of movement. Note that top horizontal flange


57


of second C-shaped member


40


is not in touching contact with either the lower horizontal flange


58


of first C-shaped flange


39


or the top horizontal flange


59


of first C-shaped member


39


.




Rigid member


55


is not in touching contact with any log and is therefor extended to its maximum. The relative positioning of the first and second C-shaped members


39


and


40


above rigid member


55


is identical to the positioning of the C-shaped members


39


and


40


above rigid member


46


.




Prior Art Distinguished




Some prior art bundle breakers elevate the log above the conveyors carrying the log during the pivoting of the clamps to sever a bundle from the logs. See Fernandez, U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,358 and Pallmac bundle breaker, not patented, but shown in undated sales brochure in the Information Disclosure Statement of this application. Both Fernandez and Pallmac provided a plurality of laterally spaced narrow width belts in their log support conveyors and used lifting blocks between the narrow belts to lift the logs during the bundle severing operation.




In contrast, Applicants provide first and second single, wide, continuous, belts


69


and


70


in both their first and second conveyors


10


and


13


as shown in

FIGS. 1-23

and do not lift the logs above either the first or second conveyors


10


and


13


at any time. Thus logs


4


and


4


′, and the bundles severed from them, rest on single, wide, belt portions,


67


and


68


of first and second single, wide, continuous, belts


69


and


70


at all times while they are on the bundle breaker machine


1


.




Unlike the Pallmac and Fernandez bundle breakers which only support about 50% of the bottom surface area of logs and bundles, the logs and bundles of the present invention are 98 to 100% supported on the bottom side of the logs, and about 80% of the top surface of logs


4


and


4


′ are engaged by rigid members


33


and


34


.




As best shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


,


5


,


6


,


21


and


22


, first and second horizontal support members


65


and


66


providing a continuous support surface are positioned below first and second belts


69


and


70


, support first and second single, wide, belt, portions,


67


and


68


. Note that first and second horizontal support members


65


and


66


are present in all of the machines of the present invention, they have been removed from some of the FIG. of the drawing to more clearly show the operation of the machine.




Pressurized Structure




First and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


which are respectively parts of first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


generally shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


,


21


, and


22


are more specifically illustrated in

FIGS. 1

,


20


, and


24


-


35


.




Referring specifically to

FIGS. 18 and 20

, the first flexible member


22


is generally shown interposed between the plurality of first rigid members


33


and the plurality of second C-shaped members


40


. First flexible member


22


, while compliant is relatively non stretchable. First flexible member


22


as previously stated is made of belting material which is rubber coated on both sides to maximize sealability and fluid retention such as air and is reinforced with nylon or polyester or steel wire reinforcing for durability and stretch resistance.




Referring to

FIG. 29

, first fluid pressurized structure


21


is formed with a generally planar upper rigid wall


38


to which a depending perimeter wall


45


is attached. Perimeter wall


45


is made up of first rigid side walls


75


and


76


and first and second rigid end walls


77


and


78


. First flexible member


22


is folded so that first end portion


79


extends upwardly as shown in FIG.


29


and may be sealably affixed to first rigid side wall


77


by bolting an end attachment plate


80


to first rigid end wall


77


by attachment bolts


81


. Second end portion


82


of first flexible member


22


is attached to second end wall


78


of first flexible member


22


in an identical manner.




First side extension


83


of first flexible member


22


is sealably attached to the bottom edge of first side wall


75


by side attachment plate


85


with attachment bolts


86


. Second side extension


84


of first flexible member


22


is sealably attached to second side wall


76


in the same manner.




Fluid pressure is increased or decreased through fluid pressure lines


105


and


106


shown in

FIG. 5

connected to fluid port


87


shown in

FIG. 29

, and pressure is read by the computer (not shown) connected by fluid lines


112


and


113


shown in

FIG. 5

connected to fluid ports


88


illustrated in FIG.


29


.




Height Detection




One of the major features of the present invention is that the log having the greatest height can be determined by sensing the difference in air pressure and the variation setting can then be made. Means for transmitting a difference in air pressure in first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


can be incorporated in the structure. As illustrated in

FIG. 5

, air lines


112


and


113


are connected to first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


and the change in air pressure is transmitted to a computer means not shown.




Specifically, as shown in

FIG. 8

when the first rigid member of the plurality of first rigid members


33


first contacts the top of the highest log


4


′, the rigid member presses against first flexible member


22


of first fluid pressurized structure


21


. Air line


112


connected to first fluid pressurized structure


21


detects the incremental increase in air pressure and sends this signal to a computer not shown. The computer then automatically adds the preselected variation setting and lowers the first clamp means


16


and first compliance structure


20


the preselected distance onto logs


4


and


4


′.




Construction Details




As illustrated in

FIGS. 2

,


33


,


34


and


35


, first and second rigid members


33


and


34


are attached by bolts


89


to C-shaped members


40


in a manner to prevent leakage of pressure from first and second fluid pressure structures


21


and


27


.




Second fluid pressure structure


27


attached to second compliance structure


26


is constructed in a similar manner and is not set forth in this application for purposes of brevity. Additionally, first and second C-shaped members


39


and


40


for limiting the maximum and minimum extension are similar in construction and operation as used in second fluid pressure structure


27


in second compliance structure


26


.




Nip Adjustment




As stated above, in most cases, it is desirable to position the end edges of the first and second rigid members


33


and


34


of first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


as close as possible to the bundle breaking plane


15


. In some cases, however, it is necessary to move the end edges of the rigid members


33


and


34


closest to the bundle breaking plane


15


, away from the bundle breaking plane


15


if, e.g., corrugated board is being severed and there are cutouts close to the weakened line


8


of each of the sheets or the weakened line


8


itself is not a straight line. Other bundle breakers on the market are able to adjust the distance of their clamps to the bundle breaking line, but applicant's novel system makes this design feature a relatively easy design feature to build into the machine. Further, resetting of the nip adjustments may be quickly and easily accomplished. This is sometimes called “nip adjustment”.




The improvement in a bundle breaker


1


of the present invention incorporating nip adjustment consists of providing a generally planar upper rigid wall


38


in each of the first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


and which are slidably affixed to respective first and second clamp means


16


and


17


for movement parallel to the direction of travel of the logs


4


.




Gear engagement means , which in this case may be a pair of gear racks


90


are mounted respectively on first and second fluid pressure structures


21


and


27


, and specifically on generally planar upper rigid wall


38


as illustrated in

FIGS. 26

,


28


,


29


,


30


,


31


,


32


, and


34


.




Pinions


91


and


92


shown in

FIG. 24

are rigidly attached to shaft


98


. Pinions


91


and


92


engage racks (not shown) attached rigidly to framework of bundle breaker


1


. These rack and pinions keep first clamp means


16


horizontal as cylinders


100


extend and retract. It also rotates pinion


97


when the cylinder is raised and lowered. The pinion


97


, as shown in

FIG. 29

, is operatively and selectively connected to racks


90


for selectively separating first and second pressurized structures


21


and


27


shown in

FIG. 21

relative to each other, and at right angles and relative to the bundle breaking plane


15


shown in

FIG. 2

, and along an axis parallel to the direction of movement of the logs


4


.




Clamping




Referring to

FIG. 6

, raising and lowering of first and second clamp means


16


and


17


is by hydraulic cylinders and pistons


100


and


102


respectively.




Second clamp means


17


and second single, wide belt portion


68


must remain parallel during raising, lowering and tilting about axis


103


shown in

FIG. 14

mounted on support


104


. Hydraulic cylinder and piston


102


is mounted for pivoting about pivot point


114


which moves with the entire tilting section about axis


103


.




As shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


,


13


, and


14


, second clamp means


17


and second compliance structure


26


pivot about pivot point


103


under the action of hydraulic cylinder and piston


115


pivoting about pivot point


116


shown in

FIGS. 1 and 21

.




As shown in

FIG. 6

, chains


107


and


108


and crossed chain


109


engaging sprocket wheels


110


and


111


are part of the mechanism for maintaining second clamp means


17


and second single, wide, belt portion


68


shown in

FIG. 5

parallel at all times.




Indexing




A feature of the present invention called “indexing” is best shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

and


13


-


14


. Indexing is the ability of a bundle breaker machine


1


to receive and hold two or more bundles


2


and


3


on the second conveyor


13


.




It may be noted that neither Palimac (not patented in the U.S.) or Duecker U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,582, or Vanhoutte, EP 0292067 can index.




The advantage of holding two or more bundles on the second conveyor


13


is that the bundle breaker machine can work much faster if the newly severed bundle


2


does not have to be immediately transferred off the second conveyor


13


. Instead, newly broken bundle


3


shown in

FIG. 14

, is simply advanced or “indexed” to the position shown in FIG.


2


.




As second conveyor


13


is discharging bundle


2


, and advancing bundle


3


, shown in

FIG. 14

, to the position formerly occupied by bundle


2


, first conveyor


10


is advancing the remainder of log


4


to the bundle breaking plane


15


position shown in FIG.


2


. Of course first and second clamp means


16


and


17


are in the raised position shown in

FIG. 2

during the aforesaid operation.




When remainder of log


4


has reached the position shown in

FIG. 2

, first and second clamp means


16


and


17


are lowered and tilting occurs about pivot axis


103


as shown in FIG.


14


. After the break occurs, second conveyor


13


returns to the horizontal position, and then second conveyor


13


is restarted and bundle


2


is discharged and bundle


3


is advanced.




The reason that indexing is more reliable using Applicants' improved bundle breaker


1


may be seen with respect to FIG.


14


. Note that there is considerable separation between bundle


2


and bundle


3


. During the tilting of second conveyor


13


and second clamp means


17


if the clamping pressure is not substantially equal on both bundles


2


and


3


, the sheets in the bundle held with less force could shift or “fan”, making the pile unsteady and more subject to falling during transfer off the bundle breaker


1


and on subsequent conveyors. Even if the bundle does not fall, a bundle which has “fanned” is more difficult to process through subsequent machines which process the bundle. Most of such machines require a straight bundle which is not fanned.




Prior art bundle breakers which tilt the bundle during breaking and which use hard clamping surfaces cannot keep the pressure even on all of the bundles; especially when the bundles are tilted. Note further, that when second conveyor


13


has reached the position shown in

FIGS. 13 and 14

, the direction of pivoting rotation is immediately reversed, placing further lateral and centrifugal forces on the bundles, especially bundle


2


. This reversal of direction can cause fanning of the sheets within the bundle unless the clamp exerts sufficient pressure on the bundle.




The advantages of Applicants improvements in bundle breakers is more apparent when the machines are not only designed to provide indexing, but also attempt to break more than one bundle at a time when they are placed in side by side relation in a row. The combining of these two features is old in the art and is not claimed per se, but Applicant's improved compliance structure greatly improves the reliability of successfully breaking side by side bundles in a row.




The present improvement in a bundle breaker


1


is best shown in


13


-


16


and in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. As illustrated , second conveyor


13


and second fluid pressurized structure


27


each have a length sufficient to receive and hold at least four or more bundles


2


and


3


in a row broken successively from a plurality of logs


4


and


4


′ in side by side relation before discharging one row of bundles


2


from second conveyor


13


.




Compliance and Indexing




The reason that Applicants' improvement with the first and second fluid pressurized structures


21


and


27


provide such improved bundle breaking is best shown in

FIGS. 13-16

.




As shown in Applicants' drawings, there are multiple rows of bundles; i.e. bundle


2


and bundle


3


, but there are also multiple bundles in each row. Further, not all the bundles and logs have the same height; presenting a major compliance problem.




Indexed bundles


2


and


3


are widely separated during tilting of second conveyor


13


, and when second conveyor


13


is carrying at least two more side by side bundles in a row which are not illustrated in the drawings. Where any one or more bundles have different heights due to a miscount by an upstream automatic machine, or because a piece of scrap material has become wedged between one more sheets in one or more of the bundles, prior art machines with hard clamp surfaces have great difficulty preventing the sheets in the bundle from fanning as discussed above.




Applicants' second flexible member


28


, and plurality of second rigid members


34


, on the other hand, ensures equal pressure on all of the severed bundles at all times, especially during the critical phase when the bundles are being tilted and the sheets are being progressively separated along the weakened lines


8


of each sheet


6


. Thus all bundles are held firmly with a minimum of fanning of the sheets in the bundles.




Description of Alternate Structure




The bundle breaker improvement of the present invention described above represents a preferred form of the invention. Other ways of making the bundle breaker improvement may be made and are intended to be covered under the claims.




While the preferred form of the invention uses fluid pressure to detect the height of logs, electrical means such as electric eyes could also be used.




Thus, an improvement in a bundle breaker


1


for shearing progressively a bundle


2


of sheets


6


along a weakened plane


9


from a log


4


may be constructed in which bundle breaker


1


includes first and second adjacent but longitudinally spaced upper


18


,


19


and lower


67


,


68


clamping surfaces as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 30

.




Specifically, the upper clamping surfaces


18


and


19


are structurally rigid surfaces of first clamp means


16


and


17


and the lower clamping surfaces


67


and


68


are the previously described first and second single, wide belt portions of first conveyor


10


and second conveyor


13


respectively.




The improvement in a bundle breaker previously described may include: first and second compliance structures


20


, and


26


positioned between the first and second, upper clamping surface


18


and


19


and lower clamping surfaces


67


and


68


; first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


including first and second detection means


22


and


27


detecting the height of log


4


; and variation setting means , including a computer not shown, reducing the distance between upper clamping surfaces


18


and


19


and lower clamping surfaces


67


and


68


, a selected increment after detecting the height of the log


4


′. In the structure as illustrated and described, whenever any of the first rigid members


33


touch the top surface


5


of the highest log


4


, first flexible member


22


is deformed and slightly increases the pressure in first fluid pressurized structure


21


. The increase in pressure is sent to a computer (not shown) which signals that the top surface


5


of the highest log


4


has been touched. For simplicity, the foregoing structure consisting of the first flexible member


22


, and the first fluid pressurized structure


21


has been referred to as a first detection means


22


. In like manner, the second detection means


28


includes second flexible member


28


, and second fluid pressurized structure


27


.




Still another form of the invention using electric eyes instead of fluid pressure changes to detect the height of the highest log


4


′ could be constructed to accommodate the processing of logs arranged in rows having a plurality of side by side logs


4


and


4


′ as follows:




The first and second compliance structures


20


and


26


may be constructed with a width substantially engaging the width of a plurality of logs


4


in a row. At least one of the logs


4


′ in the row may have a height greater than the other logs


4


. The detection means


22


and


27


may consist of electric eyes capable of detecting the log


4


′ having the greatest height. Finally, the variation setting means (computer not shown) reducing the distance between the upper clamping surfaces


18


and


19


and lower clamping surfaces


67


and


68


a selected increment after detecting said log


4


′ of greatest height may be a computer or some other device.



Claims
  • 1. An improvement in a bundle breaker for separating bundles from a log having a generally planar top surface, said log including a plurality of sheets each having a generally planar top surface and each sheet is formed with at least one weakened line, said weakened lines are vertically aligned in said log forming a weakened plane in said log, said bundle breaker including a first conveyor for conveying said log and having an upstream end for receiving said log and a downstream end, and a second conveyor having an upstream end positioned immediately adjacent to said downstream end of said first conveyor providing a gap therebetween defining a bundle breaking plane, said bundle breaker including first clamp means mounted for vertical reciprocating movement above said first conveyor, and second clamp means mounted above said second conveyor for vertical reciprocating movement in relation to said second conveyor and said second conveyor and said second clamp means mounted for conjoint pivotal movement in relation to said bundle breaking plane for progressively breaking a bundle from said log along said weakened plane in said log, said improvement comprising:a. a first compliance structure mounted on said first clamp means including, (1) a first fluid pressurized structure having a first flexible member presenting a first engagement area for operative engagement with an upstream portion of said generally planar top surface of said log and on the upstream side of said weakened plane in said log; and b. a second compliance structure mounted on said second clamp means including, (1) a second fluid pressurized structure having a second flexible member presenting a second engagement area for operative engagement with a downstream portion of said generally planar top surface of said log and on the downstream side of said weakened plane in said log.
  • 2. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 wherein:a. said first and second conveyors have a width sufficient to simultaneously transfer and support a plurality of logs in side by side relation; and b. said first and second compliance structures have a width sufficient to simultaneously engage a plurality of logs in side by side relation.
  • 3. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 2 wherein:a. said first and second compliance structures respectively having first and second fluid pressurized structures for engaging a plurality of logs in side by side relation with at least one log having a height greater than at least one other log.
  • 4. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 wherein:a. said first and second flexible members have a width extending substantially the width of said logs and in close proximity to said weakened plane in said log.
  • 5. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 comprising:a. said first and second fluid pressurized structures are each formed with a generally planar upper rigid wall affixed to said first and second clamp means, and a depending perimeter wall affixed to and extending downwardly from said generally planar upper rigid wall of said first and second fluid pressurized structures; b. said first and second flexible members are joined to said respective perimeter walls in pressure sealing engagement therewith; and c. said first and second engagement areas of said first and second flexible members each present a substantially planar unbroken surface area with infinite indentation flexibility upon the application of forces to any portion of said substantially planar unbroken surface area.
  • 6. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 or claim 2 comprising:a. means for varying the pressure in each of said first and second fluid pressurized structures.
  • 7. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 or claim 2 comprising:a. a plurality of first and second closely spaced rigid members operatively engaged by said first and second flexible members and having generally flat portions for engaging said logs.
  • 8. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 comprising:a. said plurality of first and second rigid members extend generally in the longitudinal direction of said log.
  • 9. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 comprising:a. first limiting means limiting the vertical movement of said first and second plurality of rigid members.
  • 10. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 comprisinga. second limiting means limiting the horizontal movement of said first and second plurality of rigid members.
  • 11. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 9 comprising:a. said first limiting means including a generally planar rigid member having a strength sufficient to maintain a generally planar surface during maximum clamping force; and b. a plurality of first c-shaped members arranged in parallel separated positions parallel to said rigid members; c. a plurality of second c-shaped members interlocking with said first c-shaped members; and d. each of said rigid members is individually attached to one of said second c-shaped members.
  • 12. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 5 comprising:a. said generally planar upper rigid walls of said first and second fluid pressurized structures are each slidably affixed to said respective first and second clamp means for movement parallel to the direction of travel of said logs; b. gear engagement means mounted respectively on said first and second fluid pressure structures; and c. control means operatively engaging each of said gear engagement means for selectively separating said first and second pressurized structures relative to each other, and at right angles and relative to said bundle breaking plane, and along an axis parallel to the direction of movement of said logs.
  • 13. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 wherein:a. said second conveyor and said second fluid pressurized structure each have a length to receive and hold at least two bundles broken successively from a single bundle before discharging at least one of said bundles from said second conveyor.
  • 14. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 2 wherein:a. said second conveyor and said second fluid pressurized structure each have a length sufficient to receive and hold at least two or more rows of bundles broken successively from a plurality of logs in side by side relation before discharging at least one of said rows of bundles from said second conveyor.
  • 15. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 1 comprising:a. means for transmitting a difference in air pressure in at least said first fluid pressurized structure to a computer means when said first fluid pressurized structure first contacts said log when said first clamp means is lowered.
  • 16. An improvement in a bundle breaker for shearing progressively a bundle of sheets along a weakened plane from a log, said bundle breaker including first and second adjacent but longitudinally spaced upper and lower clamping surfaces, the improvement comprising:a. first and second compliance structures positioned between said first and second, upper and lower clamping surfaces; b. said first and second compliance structures including first and second detection means detecting the height of said log; c. variation setting means reducing the distance between said upper and lower clamping surfaces a selected increment after detecting the height of said log.
  • 17. An improvement in a bundle breaker as defined in claim 16 wherein:a. said first and second compliance structures having a width substantially engaging the width of a plurality of logs in a row; b. at least one of said logs in said row having a height greater than said other logs; c. said detection means is capable of detecting said log having the greatest height; and d. said variation setting means reducing the distance between said upper and lower clamping surfaces a selected increment after detecting said log of greatest height.
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
1669999 Olsen May 1928 A
2171769 Stolar et al. Sep 1939 A
3286893 Zellers, Jr. Nov 1966 A
3517869 Dryon Jun 1970 A
3658220 Norton Apr 1972 A
4136604 Schmidt Jan 1979 A
4171081 Vossen et al. Oct 1979 A
4500022 Lucas Feb 1985 A
4714035 Engle Dec 1987 A
4987723 Diemer Jan 1991 A
5069195 Barozzi Dec 1991 A
5791038 Libert et al. Aug 1998 A
5810156 Siebels Sep 1998 A
5865358 Fernandez Feb 1999 A
5927582 Duecker Jul 1999 A
6019267 Shill et al. Feb 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1 292 067 Nov 1988 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Pallmac Brochure; Pallmac Omni-Seperator For Your Rotary Or Flatbed Diecutter (4pgs) Ashland, Virginia and Brugge, Belgium.