None.
None.
This invention generally relates to hydroelectric power plants, specifically to electric generators, turbines, and electric motors.
Traditionally devices that generate or utilize rotational energy lose efficiency from friction. Hydrostatic bearings provide some relief, but fall short of entirely supporting rotors in electric power plants.
Accordingly, objects and advantages of the invention include efficiency gains realized by applying buoyancy devices to apparatus that rely on and or generate rotational energy. Buoyancy devices reduce the amount of friction, thus creating less drag than the use of bearings alone. An optimal micro surface can be achieved on the floatation devices by utilizing special coatings that provide a much better hydrodynamic profile. As a result, power plants may increase the size of the magnets they incorporate in their rotors, that will in turn, generate more electric current. Electric motors, pumps, and turbines all benefit from buoyancy devices.
This invention uses bearings, perhaps magnetic or hydrostatic, as placeholders rather than as a means to entirely suspend the rotor.
Another advantage is vibration reduction, allowing for a more precise operation and a longer life cycle for moving parts.
Further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.
Standard electric generators, motors, and turbines lose valuable rotational energy as a result of gravity induced friction. This invention minimizes these effects by providing a means to suspend these devices in a bath of heavy fluid while still permitting the device to rotate freely. An optimal micro surface can be achieved on the floatation devices by utilizing special coatings that provide a much better hydrodynamic profile than bearings alone. Higher efficiencies from reduced friction allow for the use of larger magnets that generate more electric current.
Vibration is also reduced allowing for more precise operation and longer life cycles for moving parts.
The buoyancy devices 8 and 11 are the inner tube variety and may be hollow or contain a substance that is lighter than water. The shells of the buoyancy devices 8 and 11 may be constructed from composite materials. aluminum, or even a steel alloy. An optimal micro surface can be achieved by utilizing special coatings on the flotation devices providing a much better hydrodynamic profile.
The flotation chambers 9 and 12 may be embedded within the structure of the generating station or stand alone.
The flotation chambers 5 may be embedded within the structure of the generating station or stand alone and contain fluids such as oil or mercury.
The flotation chambers 9 and 12 are filled with a heavy fluid to a point at which the weight of the device is minimized. The attached buoyancy devices 8 and 11 floating in vessels 9 and 12 exert upward pressure on the turbine cylinder 4 that reduces the load on the bearings 5 and 13.
Operation of the Buoyant Turbine 1 is the same as conventional hydraulic turbine installations where kinetic energy is captured from passing water and converted into rotational energy.
Operation of the electric generator 1 is the same as in conventional power plants, where rotational energy is converted into electricity by alternating magnetic fields produced by the rotor 6 spinning adjacent to the stationary electric conductors 7.
As in a typical hydroelectric power plant, moving water enters the turbine/generator 16 and forces the turbine's blades 3 to rotate on bearings 5 and 13. Attached buoyancy devices 8 and 11 floating in the vessels 9 and 12 exert upward pressure on the Buoyant Hollow Generator 16, thus reducing the load on the bearings 5 and 13, which permits larger magnets to be installed.
The buoyancy devices 8 and 11 may be hollow or contain a substance that is substantially lighter than the heavy fluid in the vessels 9 and 12. The shells of the buoyancy devices 8 and 11 may be constructed from composite materials, aluminum or even a steel alloy. An optimal micro surface, not shown, can be achieved by utilizing special coatings, perhaps nano technology based, on the buoyancy devices, providing a much better hydrodynamic profile.
The flotation chambers 9 and 12 may be embedded within the structure of the generating station or stand alone and contain fluids such as oil.
In
Operation of the Buoyant Rotor 20 is the same as in conventional vower plants, where rotational energy is converted into electricity by alternating magnetic fields produced by the rotor 7 spinning adjacent to the stators 18 and 19.
The flotation chambers 35 may be embedded within the structure of the generating station or stand alone.
As seen in
Operation of the electric generator is the same as in conventional power plants where rotational energy derived from a turbine 33 is converted into electricity by an alternating magnetic field generated by the rotor 7 adjacent to the stators 31 and 32.
a and 5b depict side views of a Hollow Turbine, turbine blades 3, and directional funnels 39 and 40. as mounted within the power plant.
As in a typical hydroelectric power plant, moving water enters the turbine, in
Applying electric power from input 43 to the rotor 7 produces a magnetic field that generates rotational energy in the shaft 23. Attached buoyancy devices 8 and 11 floating in the vessels 9 and 12 exert upward pressure on the shaft 23 that reduces the load on the bearings 22 and 24, which permits larger magnets to be installed on the rotor 7, resulting in more electric current being generated.
The addition of buoyancy means to devices that rely on rotational energy increases efficiency and stability. Devices that will benefit include but are not limited to electric generators, motors, turbines, and pumps.
The above description contains many specificities; these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but as exemplifications of the presently preferred embodiments thereof. Other ramifications and variations are possible within the teachings of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent applications: Ser. No. 60/657,507, filed Feb. 28, 2005 by the present inventor, Ser. No. 60/694,503, filed Jun. 27, 2005 by the present inventor, Ser. No. 60/700,421, filed Jul. 18, 2005 by the present inventor, Ser. No. 60/702,792, filed Jul. 26, 2005 by the present inventor, Ser. No. 60/714,711, filed Sep. 6, 2005 by the present inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3934948 | Pruvot | Jan 1976 | A |
3986787 | Mouton et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4163904 | Skendrovic | Aug 1979 | A |
4335319 | Mettersheimer, Jr. | Jun 1982 | A |
4748808 | Hill | Jun 1988 | A |
5491366 | Newman | Feb 1996 | A |
5493855 | Walters et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
6109863 | Milliken | Aug 2000 | A |
6551053 | Schuetz | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616403 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658083 | Sai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6880976 | Huang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6995479 | Tharp | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7235893 | Platt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060192387 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60714711 | Sep 2005 | US | |
60702792 | Jul 2005 | US | |
60700421 | Jul 2005 | US | |
60694503 | Jun 2005 | US | |
60657507 | Feb 2005 | US |