Hydrocarbons are widely used as a primary source of energy, and have a significant impact on the world economy. Consequently, the discovery and efficient production of hydrocarbon resources is increasingly important. As relatively accessible hydrocarbon deposits are depleted, hydrocarbon prospecting and production has expanded to new regions that may be more difficult to reach and/or may pose new technological challenges. During typical operations, a borehole is drilled into the earth, whether on land or below the sea, to reach a reservoir containing hydrocarbons. Such hydrocarbons are typically in the form of oil, gas, or mixtures thereof which may then be brought to the surface through the borehole.
Well testing is often performed to help evaluate the possible production value of a reservoir. During well testing, a test well is drilled to produce a test flow of fluid from the reservoir. During the test flow, key parameters such as fluid pressure and fluid flow rate are monitored over a time period. The response of those parameters may be determined during various types of well tests, such as pressure drawdown, interference, reservoir limit tests, and other tests generally known by those skilled in the art. The data collected during well testing may be used to assess the economic viability of the reservoir. The costs associated with performing the testing operations are significant, however, and may exceed the cost of drilling the test well. Accordingly, testing operations should be performed as efficiently and economically as possible.
One common procedure during well testing operations is flaring a gas flow associated with the well effluent. Many types of burners and flares are known that can efficiently combust gas flows having relatively high colorific content (i.e., a relatively high percentage of methane) without producing significant smoke or fallout. That is because, with a high calorific content, a high velocity gas jet may thoroughly mix with minimal risk of blowing out the flame.
It is more difficult, however, to cleanly burn gas flows having low calorific content, also known as “lean gases.” Lean gas flows may have a relatively high proportion of inert gases, such as nitrogen, which dilute the flammable content of the gas and therefore increase the risk of quenching the flame. Other inert gases, such as carbon dioxide, do not simply dilute the gas but may also actively inhibit flame when present in certain concentrations, such as greater than 35% of the gas flow content. Even at concentrations less than 35%, the flame inhibiting inert gases such as carbon dioxide may significantly increase the risk of flame blow-off.
Various burner designs have been proposed for combusting gas having a low calorific content. In general, the proposed burners require complex gas flow paths that are susceptible to clogging, have complex designs that complicate construction and maintenance, and/or are otherwise unsuitable for flaring waste fuel during well testing operations.
In accordance with certain aspects of the disclosure, a burner assembly is provided for flaring a low calorific gas. The burner assembly may include a burner pipe disposed along a burner pipe axis and having an inlet pipe having an inlet pipe cross-sectional area extending substantially perpendicular to the burner pipe axis, an intermediate pipe coupled to the inlet pipe and having an intermediate pipe cross-sectional area extending substantially perpendicular to the burner pipe axis that is greater than the inlet pipe cross-sectional area, and an expander pipe coupled to the intermediate pipe and having an expander pipe cross-sectional area extending substantially perpendicular to the burner pipe axis that is greater than the intermediate pipe cross-sectional area. A hub may be disposed within a downstream portion of the expander pipe and have a hub upstream end facing the intermediate pipe and a hub downstream end. A plurality of guide vanes may interconnecting the expander pipe and the hub, and a deflector may be coupled to the hub and have a deflector exterior surface with a substantially frustoconical shape extending radially outwardly from the burner pipe axis and axially downstream of the hub downstream end, wherein the deflector exterior surface is oriented at a deflector surface angle relative to the burner pipe axis.
In accordance with additional aspects of the disclosure, a method of flaring a low calorific gas may include flowing the low calorific gas through a burner pipe disposed along a burner pipe axis, the burner pipe including an inlet pipe having a relatively small cross-sectional area, an intermediate pipe having an intermediate cross-sectional area, and an expander pipe having a relatively large cross-sectional area, wherein the low calorific gas flows successively through the inlet pipe, intermediate pipe, and expander pipe. A central portion of the relatively large cross-sectional area of the expander pipe may be obstructed with a hub disposed at a downstream portion of the expander pipe to create a perimeter gas flow along the expander pipe. The perimeter gas flow may be rotated about the burner pipe axis to create a swirling gas flow exiting the expander pipe. A recirculation flow may be generated downstream of the expander pipe by directing the swirling gas flow radially outwardly along an exterior surface of a deflector, the deflector exterior surface having a substantially frustoconical shape.
The summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Embodiments of burner assemblies and flaring methods suitable for combusting gas flows having low calorific content are described with reference to the following figures. The same numbers are used throughout the figures to reference like features and components.
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the disclosed embodiments are sometimes illustrated diagrammatically and in partial views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that this disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
So that the above features and advantages of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and therefore are not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Burner assemblies and methods are disclosed herein for use with a gas flow having a low calorific content, such as waste effluent from a supply line formed during well testing operations. The generic term used to describe such waste effluent is often roughly termed a gas flow to be combusted. In general, the assemblies and methods are adapted to decelerate the superficial velocity of the gas flow provided by the supply line to prevent flame blow-off, and to create a large recirculation zone downstream of the burner to ensure flame stability.
The burner assembly 100 includes a burner pipe 102 disposed along a burner pipe axis 104 and having a plurality of stages. In the illustrated embodiment the burner pipe 102 has three stages; however other embodiments of the burner pipe may have a different number of stages. More specifically, the burner pipe 102 may include an inlet pipe 105, an intermediate pipe 106 having an intermediate pipe upstream end 108 coupled to the inlet pipe 105 and an intermediate pipe downstream end 110, and an expander pipe 112 coupled to the intermediate pipe downstream end 110. The stages of the burner pipe 102 are sized so that the gas flow successively encounters a larger cross-sectional area within the burner pipe 102. Accordingly, the inlet pipe 105 may have an inlet pipe cross-sectional area that is relatively small, the intermediate pipe 106 may have an intermediate pipe cross-sectional area that is larger than the inlet pipe cross-sectional area, and the expander pipe 112 may have an expander pipe cross-sectional area that is larger than the intermediate pipe cross-sectional area.
In the illustrated embodiment, the inlet pipe 105, intermediate pipe 106, and expander pipe 112 are shown as having generally cylindrical shapes. Accordingly, the relative sizes of the cross-sectional areas of the pipes may be determined based on their respective diameters. For example, the inlet pipe 105 may have an inlet pipe diameter D1, the intermediate pipe 106 may have an intermediate pipe diameter D2, and the expander pipe 112 may have an expander pipe diameter D3. Furthermore, as shown in
The expander pipe 112 may include an expander pipe upstream end 114 coupled to and fluidly communicating with the intermediate pipe 106, and an expander pipe downstream end 116 open to atmosphere and therefore defining a burner pipe outlet 118. A hub 120 may be disposed in a downstream portion of the burner pipe 102 adjacent the expander pipe downstream end 116. In the illustrated embodiment, the hub 120 is concentric with, and has an overall profile shape that is substantially symmetrical relative to, the burner pipe axis 104. The hub 120 may include a hub upstream end 122 generally facing the intermediate pipe 106, a hub downstream end 124 opposite the hub upstream end 122, and a hub side wall 126 connecting the hub upstream and downstream ends 122, 124. The hub upstream end 122 may have a conical shape defining an apex 128 disposed substantially along the burner pipe axis 104. The hub side wall 126 may be cylindrical and have a diameter D4 defining a maximum hub cross-sectional area extending substantially perpendicular to the burner pipe axis 104. To create a perimeter gas flow along the inside surface of the expander pipe 112, as described in greater detail below, the hub 120 may be sized to obstruct a central portion of an expander chamber 119 defined by the expander pipe 112. In some applications, the maximum hub cross-sectional area may be approximately 30 to 50% of the expander pipe cross-sectional area to create the desired perimeter gas flow. The hub downstream end 124 may be substantially planar as shown in
A plurality of guide vanes 130 may extend between the expander pipe 112 and the hub 120 to hold the hub 120 in position within the expander pipe 112 and to impart a rotation to the gas flow, as described in greater detail below. The number of guide vanes 130 may be selected so that there are a sufficient number to produce the desired rotational flow but not so many as to restrict flow or create a significant risk of catching debris entrained in the gas flow. Accordingly, approximately 3 to 8 guide vanes 130 may be provided in the burner assembly 100. Each guide vane 130 may include a guide vane upstream surface 132 facing upstream toward the intermediate pipe 106 and oriented at a guide vane angle a relative to the burner pipe axis 104. In some embodiments, the guide vane angle a may be approximately 20 to 45 degrees. Additionally, the guide vanes may be configured to have profiles that increase the efficiency with which rotation is imparted to the gas flow.
A deflector 140 may be positioned downstream of the burner pipe 102 to stabilize the flame during operation. As shown in
In operation, the gas flow is communicated to the burner assembly 100. As the gas flow travels through the burner pipe 102, the successively larger cross-sectional areas of the inlet pipe 105, intermediate pipe 106, and expander pipe 112 will reduce the superficial velocity of the gas flow. As the gas flow enters the expander pipe 112 from the intermediate pipe 106, the relatively large and abrupt change in cross-sectional area may produce an internal recirculation zone 150 in the upstream portion of the expander pipe 112.
The hub 120 may obstruct a central portion of the gas flow through the downstream portion of the expander pipe 112, thereby to create a perimeter gas flow 152. The guide vanes 130 may impart a rotation of the perimeter gas flow generally centered about the burner pipe axis 104, thereby to create a swirling gas flow, which may be substantially helical, as the gas flow exits the expander pipe 112. Downstream of the burner pipe 102, the deflector 140 directs the swirling gas flow radially outwardly, which creates a relatively large exterior recirculation zone 154 downstream of the deflector 140. This exterior recirculation zone 154 further reduces gas flow velocity, thereby promoting stable and efficient combustion of the gas flow.
Additionally, the burner assembly 100 is equipped with a set of pilot burners 155 needed for ignition of flame and stabilization of gas burning. The set of burners 155 may be positioned at the outer edge of the expander pipe 112.
The burner assembly 100 may create stable combustion of low calorific content gas flow under a variety of gas flow pressures and related superficial velocities.
In view of the foregoing, burner assemblies and methods are provided that may efficiently combust low calorific content gas under a variety of pressures. As noted above, a gas flow pattern conducive to a stable flame is produced under subsonic, sonic, and supersonic gas velocities through the burner pipe 102. The low amount of swirling induced by the guide vanes 130 stabilizes the gas flow and shortens the flame length. The conical deflector 140 further keeps the flame near the burner pipe outlet, thereby reducing the possibility of flame blow-off. In addition to creating the perimeter flow pattern, the hub 120 also helps prevent flashback by obstructing flow through the central portion of the expander pipe 112.
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from the burner assembly and methods for flaring low calorific content gases disclosed and claimed herein. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a screw may be equivalent structures.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/RU2013/000503 | 6/17/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/204333 | 12/24/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1206153 | Smith | Nov 1916 | A |
1697048 | Cox | Jan 1929 | A |
2267025 | Grindle | Dec 1941 | A |
2360548 | Conway | Oct 1944 | A |
3049085 | Musat | Aug 1962 | A |
3796209 | Luft | Mar 1974 | A |
3904349 | Peterson | Sep 1975 | A |
4003693 | Straitz, III | Jan 1977 | A |
4323343 | Reed et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4462795 | Vosper | Jul 1984 | A |
4479442 | Itse | Oct 1984 | A |
4768948 | Hansen | Sep 1988 | A |
4879959 | Korenberg | Nov 1989 | A |
5199355 | Larue | Apr 1993 | A |
5284437 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5295816 | Kobayashi | Mar 1994 | A |
5567141 | Joshi | Oct 1996 | A |
5588380 | LaRose | Dec 1996 | A |
5685242 | Narato | Nov 1997 | A |
5697306 | LaRue | Dec 1997 | A |
5758587 | Buchner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810575 | Schwartz | Sep 1998 | A |
5823759 | Swithenbank | Oct 1998 | A |
5829367 | Ohta | Nov 1998 | A |
6027332 | Glotin | Feb 2000 | A |
6190163 | Maricic | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6390805 | Paschereit | May 2002 | B1 |
6524098 | Tsirulnikov et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6889619 | Okazaki | May 2005 | B2 |
7448218 | Heilos et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8814560 | Le Mer | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20080280238 | Smith et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20150316257 | Skachkov | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2043232 | Oct 1980 | GB |
64323 | Jun 2007 | RU |
2315239 | Jan 2008 | RU |
2324117 | May 2008 | RU |
2477423 | Mar 2013 | RU |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the related PCT application PCT/RU2013/000503 dated Dec. 22, 2015 (11 pages). |
Decision of Grant issued in the related RU application 2016101070, dated Mar. 23, 2017 (22 pages). |
Industrial Burners Handbook, CRC Press, 2000, p. 237, p. 579. |
A. Valera-Medina et al., Central recirculation zone analysis in an unconfined tangential swirl burner with varying degrees of premixing—Exp Fluids, 2011, vol. 50, p. 1611-1623. |
Huang et al., Effect of swirl on combustion dynamics in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor—Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 30, Issue 2, 2005, p. 1775-1782. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/RU2013/000503 dated Mar. 13, 2014; 8 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in PCT/RU2013/000503 dated Feb. 27, 2014; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160131361 A1 | May 2016 | US |