According to an embodiment, a burner includes at least one fuel nozzle configured to output a diverging fuel stream and a perforated flame holder disposed away from the fuel nozzle(s). The perforated flame holder has a proximal side and a distal side disposed toward and away from the fuel nozzle, respectively. The perforated flame holder defines a plurality of elongated apertures extending from the proximal side of the flame holder, through the flame holder, to the distal side of the flame holder. The fuel nozzle and the perforated flame holder are arranged to provide at least partial premixing of the diverging fuel stream with a fluid containing an oxidizer, such as air or flue gas in a premixing region between the fuel nozzle and the flame holder. The flame holder is configured to support a flame in the plurality of elongated apertures and in regions immediately above the distal side of the flame holder and/or immediately below the proximal side of the flame holder.
According to an embodiment, a perforated flame holder for a combustion reaction includes a high temperature-compatible material having a distal surface and a proximal surface, and a plurality of elongated apertures formed to extend through the high temperature compatible material from the proximal surface to the distal surface. The perforated flame holder is configured to be supported in a combustion volume, aligned with a diverging fuel stream provided by at least one fuel nozzle, and separated from the at fuel nozzle by a distance selected to provide at least partial premixing of the diverging fuel stream with a surrounding gas. A flame holder support structure is configured to maintain a selected alignment between the flame holder proximal surface and the fuel nozzle.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. Other embodiments may be used and/or other changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure.
The flame holder 102 has a proximal side 108 and a distal side 110. The proximal side 108 and the distal side 110 are disposed toward and away from the fuel nozzles 106, respectively. The flame holder 102 defines a plurality of elongated orifices or apertures 104. The plurality of elongated apertures 104 extend from the proximal side 108 of the flame holder 102, through the flame holder 102, to the distal side 110 of the flame holder 102.
In the embodiment shown, the fuel nozzles 106 and the flame holder 102 are separated a distance sufficient to provide at least partial premixing of the diverging fuel stream 302 with a fluid containing an oxidizer, such as air or flue gas, in a premixing region R1 between the fuel nozzles 106 and the flame holder 102. The flame holder 102 is configured to support a flame 304 within the plurality of elongated apertures 104. Under some conditions, the flame can also extend through the distal side 110 of the flame holder 102 into a region R2 above the distal side 110 of the flame holder 102. Under some conditions, the flame can also extend through the proximal side 108 of the flame holder 102 into a region R3 just below the proximal side 108 of the flame holder 102.
According to an embodiment, the burner 100 includes a burner tile 116 disposed adjacent to the fuel nozzles 106 and can occupy a portion of a distance D1 between the fuel nozzles 106 and the flame holder 102.
As shown in particular in
In the embodiment shown, in which a plurality of fuel nozzles 106 are provided, the plurality of fuel nozzles 106 includes a plurality of primary fuel nozzles 202 and a corresponding plurality of secondary fuel nozzles 120. The primary fuel nozzles 202 are configured to selectably support a primary flame (or flames) 306. The diverging fuel stream 302 includes secondary fuel streams 303 supported by the secondary fuel nozzles 120. The primary fuel nozzles 202 and the secondary fuel nozzles 120 are separated by the burner tile 116. The primary flames 306 preferably have a trajectory selected to ignite the secondary fuel streams 303 at or near the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116.
Premixing of the secondary fuel streams 303 in the premixing region R1 can be viewed as being associated with the formation of vortices 308, in the premixing region R1. The vortices 308 cause entrainment of air or flue gas into the cores of the vortices, which can be viewed as well-stirred tank reactors (see
If the vortices 308 receive sufficient thermal energy from the primary flames 306, then the resultant heating of the vortex cores (if mixing is provided at a Damkohler Number (Da) greater than or equal to 1) will also cause ignition of the secondary fuel streams 303, as shown in
If the vortices 308 do not receive heat from the primary flames 306, then there can be substantially no ignition of the secondary fuel streams 303. This can be viewed as a prevention of heat recirculation to the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116. This was found by the inventors to cause the secondary flame 304 to be held by the flame holder 102 above the premixing region R1, as shown in
While the premixing region R1 is described as extending from the intermediate flame support surface 118 and the proximal surface 108 of the flame holder 102, it will be understood that this is an approximation made for ease of understanding. The inventors have found that the secondary flame 304 can occasionally and briefly extend downward from the proximal surface 108 of the flame holder 102. Under this instantaneous condition, vortices 308 in the premixing region R1 can be temporarily bounded by a flame front and premixing may temporarily diminish or stop. However, such flame extensions were found to be transient, and on a time-averaged basis the premixing region R1 can still be considered to support premixing of the secondary fuel stream 302 with air or flue gas.
Another effect found by the inventors was a subtle extension of the secondary flame 304 to a flow stagnation region R3 adjacent to the proximal surface 108 of the flame holder 102 (as illustrated in
The inventors found that the extension of the secondary flame 304 into the stagnation region adjacent to the proximal surface 108 of the flame holder 102 may be desirable. The presence of the secondary flame 304 in the stagnation region appeared to be associated with somewhat more stable operation of the burner 100 compared to cases where visible ignition occurred in the elongated apertures 104.
Ignition of the secondary fuel stream 302 by the primary flames 306, as shown in
In other words, premixing of the secondary fuel stream 302 with an oxidizing fluid, such as air or flue gas, in the premixing region R1 is substantially prevented when the secondary fuel ignites near and is held by the intermediate flame support surface 118. The flame front acts to stop mixing of the air or flue gas with the fuel. Accordingly, supporting the secondary flame 304 at the intermediate flame support surface 118 caused a richer fuel to air mixture. A richer burning mixture may be associated with a somewhat more stable flame (notwithstanding additional flame stability caused by the elongated aperture 104 structures of the flame holder 102) but also a hotter burning flame compared to a leaner burning mixture caused by additional premixing of the secondary fuel stream 302 with air or flue gas in the premixing region R1, as shown in
Selectable attenuation or stopping of the primary flames 306 can be configured to substantially prevent ignition of the secondary fuel stream 302 at or near the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116. The substantial preventing of ignition of the secondary fuel stream 302 at or near the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116 can cause the secondary flame 304 to be supported by the flame holder 102, as will be explained in more detail below.
In the embodiment of
According to an embodiment, a primary fuel control valve 312 is arranged to control fuel flow from a fuel source 314 to the primary fuel nozzles 202. The primary fuel control valve 312 can include, for example, a manually actuated valve, an electrically actuated valve, a hydraulically actuated valve, or a pneumatically actuated valve. The primary fuel control valve 312 can be configured to control a characteristic of the primary flames 306 independently from a flow rate of fuel in the secondary fuel streams 303.
A primary fuel pressure valve or pressure control fitting 316 is configured to control pressure of fuel flowing to the primary fuel nozzles 202. The primary fuel pressure valve 316 can be configured to control fuel pressure delivered to the primary fuel nozzles 202 independently from fuel pressure delivered to the secondary fuel nozzles 120.
A secondary fuel control valve 318 is arranged to control fuel flow from the fuel source 314 to the secondary fuel nozzles 120. The secondary fuel control valve 318 can include, for example, a manually actuated valve, an electrically actuated valve, a hydraulically actuated valve, or a pneumatically actuated valve. The secondary fuel control valve 318 can be configured to control a characteristic of the secondary flame 304 independently from a flow rate of fuel to the primary fuel nozzles 202.
A secondary fuel pressure valve or pressure control fitting 320 is configured to control pressure of fuel flowing to the secondary fuel nozzles 120. The secondary fuel pressure valve 320 can be configured to control fuel pressure delivered to the secondary fuel nozzles 120 independently from fuel pressure delivered to the primary fuel nozzles 202.
Alternatively or additionally the primary fuel control valve 316, a primary fuel stream or primary flame 306 deflector can be provided, configured to control a trajectory of the primary flames 306. The primary fuel stream or primary flame deflector is configured to control exposure of the secondary fuel stream 302 to heat at or near the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116. According to an embodiment, the burner tile 116 is disposed peripheral to or surrounding a combustion air passage 204 formed in a combustion volume floor, wall, or ceiling 122. The flame holder 102, in the embodiment of
According to various embodiments, the flame holder 102 is between 1 inch and 4 inches in thickness between the proximal 108 and distal 110 sides. For example, the flame holder 102 can be about 2 inches in thickness between the proximal 108 and distal 110 sides.
The proximal side 108 of the flame holder 102 can be positioned, for example, between 3 inches and 24 inches away from the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116. For example, the proximal side 108 of the flame holder 102 can be disposed between 4 inches and 9 inches away from the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116.
According to an embodiment, the plurality of elongated apertures 104 extending through the flame holder 102 are less than about 1.0 inch in transverse dimension orthogonal to axes of the elongated apertures. For example, the plurality of elongated apertures 104 extending through the flame holder 102 can be between 0.25 inch and 0.75 inch in transverse dimension orthogonal to axes of the elongated apertures. In particular examples, the plurality of elongated apertures 104 defined by the flame holder 102 can be between 0.375 inch and 0.50 inch in transverse dimension orthogonal to axes of the elongated apertures 104.
The flame holder 102 is preferably formed from a refractory material such as a material including a high temperature ceramic fiber. For example, the material can be formed from alumina-silica fibers and binders. In experiments performed by the inventors, the flame holder 102 was formed from a Fiberfrax® Duraboard® product available from Unifrax Corporation, having a principal place of business at 2351 Whirlpool Street; Niagara Falls, N.Y. (USA). The flame holder 102 can be formed by cutting a disk of the appropriate diameter from a material that includes a high temperature ceramic fiber, and by drilling the elongated apertures 104 through the disk. According to another embodiment, the flame holder is cast substantially in its final form from a refractory material.
The flame holder 102 is preferably electrically insulating. However, in other embodiments, the flame holder 102 can be electrically conductive.
A flame holder support structure 126 can be configured to support the flame holder 102 in a furnace, boiler, or other combustion volume aligned to receive the secondary fuel stream 302. The flame holder support structure 126 can be configured to support the flame holder 102 substantially completely around the periphery of the flame holder 102. The flame holder support structure 126 can be formed from steel, for example. In some embodiments, the flame holder support structure 126 is formed integrally with the flame holder 102. For example, the flame holder 102 can be formed by casting the flame holder 102 over a portion of the flame holder support structure 126. According to another embodiment, the flame holder 102 and the flame holder support structure 126 are cast together as a monolithic structure. The flame holder support structure 126 can be configured to couple the flame holder 102 to the burner tile 116, as shown in
The fuel nozzles 106 are configured to output a gaseous fuel. In experiments, the inventors used natural gas to test performance and evolve the design. Alternatively or additionally, the fuel nozzles 106 can be configured to output an aerosol of a liquid fuel or a powdered solid fuel.
According to an embodiment, the proximal surface 108 of the flame holder 102 is hardened or includes a hard component configured to resist erosion from the diverging fuel stream.
According to some embodiments, the proximal and distal surfaces 108, 110 are substantially planar. The distal surface 110 and proximal surface can be non-parallel. For example, a thickness of the flame holder 102 can be varied to correspond to an optimal length of the elongated apertures 104, dependent upon fuel flow and lateral divergence distance of the fuel flow across the proximal surface.
Alternatively, the distal surface 110 and the proximal surface 108 can be parallel to one another. The distal surface 110 and proximal surface 108 can define a flame holder thickness. According to an embodiment, the flame holder thickness is about 4 inches.
A method of operation of the burner 100 is described hereafter, according to an embodiment. In operation, and in particular, during start up of the burner 100, as depicted in
Because the burner tile 116 separates the secondary nozzles 120 from the primary nozzle 202 and in particular from the combustion air passage 204, there is not sufficient oxidizer to support a flame in the vicinity of the secondary nozzles 120. The secondary fuel streams 303 therefore rise until they clear the intermediate flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116 and begin to form vortices 308 above the burner tile 116, and to entrain air from the air passage 204. As soon as sufficient air has been entrained into the vortex cores, heat from the primary flame 306 ignites the secondary fuel streams 303, producing a secondary flame 304 that is supported or held by the flame support surface 118 of the burner tile 116. In addition to the heat supplied by the primary flames 306, a portion of the heat generated by the secondary flames 304 is recirculated by the vortices 308, which enables continued combustion at the flame support surface 118. Heat from the secondary flame 304 also preheats the flame holder 102. While the secondary flame 304 is present at the flame support surface 118, its flame front acts as a barrier to prevent air from reaching the remaining fuel, which is substantially enclosed within the secondary flame 304.
Once the flame holder 102 has reached a minimum operating temperature, the primary valve 316 is partially or completely closed, reducing or extinguishing the primary flame 306, as shown in
The flame holder 102 can be configured to be aligned with a diverging fuel stream from a single fuel nozzle. For example, the embodiments of
The perforated flame holder can be formed as an overall toric shape having a central opening 124 and an outer rim 402. The plurality of elongated apertures 104 can be positioned or arranged in a plurality of coaxial circles as shown, for example, in
In the embodiment of
The concentric circles 506, 508, 510 are positioned around a central aperture 512, as shown. According to an embodiment, the elongated apertures 104 arranged in the concentric circles 506, 508, 510 are, respectively, 0.375 inch, 0.5 inch, and 0.75 inches in diameter.
Placing the elongated apertures in aperture patterns 502 serves to maximize mechanical robustness of the flame holder 500 in areas where the elongated apertures 104 are not needed to support a combustion reaction. This approach is believed to be advantageous.
Moreover, in experiments conducted by the inventors using a half-scale experimental burner with flame holders in configurations similar to those of many of the embodiments disclosed herein, the smaller size of the largest apertures 104, i.e., those of the concentric circles 506, 508, 510 described with reference to
The inventors also tested flame holder geometries where a single flame holder would be aligned with a single or each of a plurality of fuel nozzles and corresponding fuel streams.
As indicated above, in experiments conducted with a perforated flame holder similar to the flame holder 600 of
In the embodiments shown in
The shape of the elongated aperture 104 can affect the optimum thickness of the flame holder 102, the flame holding characteristics of the flame holder, the combustion efficiency realized with the flame holder, and/or the mechanical and thermal robustness of the flame holder. A cylindrical elongated aperture may be the most simple to make. For example, the taper can be particularly advantageous in economical manufacturing processes, inasmuch as it can provide for the relief required in a casting operation to permit the removal of a cast part from a mold. Additionally, a tapered elongated aperture (more specifically, an elongated aperture that increases in area from the proximal side to the distal side of the flame holder) can allow for thermal expansion without causing “sonic choke” within the elongated aperture. A tapered elongated aperture may operate in a manner akin to a ramjet, where thermal expansion through the elongated aperture produces “thrust” that enhances flow. A stepped and tapered elongated aperture may additionally provided enhanced flame holding owing to vortices formed adjacent to the step(s). A flame holder including a vertical portion and a tapered or stepped and tapered portion may enhance flame holding owing to enhanced vortex formation adjacent to the distal surface of the flame holder proximate to the vertical edge.
An optimal shape of the flame holder, the elongated aperture pattern shape, the thickness of the flame holder, and/or the elongated aperture sectional shape can vary with burner design parameters. For example, a fuel that undergoes combustion with a reduction in moles of products compared to reactants reduce an amount of area increase in a cross sectional shape optimized for thermal expansion. For example, longer chain hydrocarbons have relatively fewer hydrogen atoms and produce less water vapor than methane and other shorter chain hydrocarbons. Similarly, a fuel that is introduced as a powdered solid or as an aerosol has reactants that occupy less volume than a gaseous fuel. A phase change between reactants and products can increase an optimum taper angle of elongated apertures, decrease optimal flame holder thickness, change optimal elongated aperture size, and/or change optimal elongated aperture pattern.
In tests conducted by the inventors, using natural gas, significant improvements in reduction of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) were achieved. In an experiment using a flame holder having the elongated aperture pattern shown in
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments are contemplated. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
The present application is a U.S. Continuation application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/763,271, entitled “PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER AND BURNER INCLUDING A PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER,” filed Jul. 24, 2015; co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/763,271 is a U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016628, entitled “PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER AND BURNER INCLUDING A PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER,” filed Feb. 14, 2014; which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/765,022, entitled “PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER AND BURNER INCLUDING A PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER,” filed Feb. 14, 2013; each of which, to the extent not inconsistent with the disclosure herein, are incorporated by reference. The present application is related to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016626, entitled “SELECTABLE DILUTION LOW NOx BURNER,” filed Feb. 14, 2014; International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016632, entitled “FUEL COMBUSTION SYSTEM WITH A PERFORATED REACTION HOLDER,” filed Feb. 14, 2014; and International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016622, entitled “STARTUP METHOD AND MECHANISM FOR A BURNER HAVING A PERFORATED FLAME HOLDER,” filed Feb. 14, 2014; each of which, to the extent not inconsistent with the disclosure herein, are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2560862 | Harrison | Jul 1951 | A |
3076605 | Holden | Feb 1963 | A |
3216477 | Devine | Nov 1965 | A |
3228614 | Bauer | Jan 1966 | A |
3324924 | Hailstone et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3663154 | Locke | May 1972 | A |
3847534 | Nomaguchi | Nov 1974 | A |
4021188 | Yamagishi et al. | May 1977 | A |
4081958 | Schelp | Apr 1978 | A |
4397356 | Retallick | Aug 1983 | A |
4408461 | Bruhwiler et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4473349 | Kumatsu | Sep 1984 | A |
4519770 | Kesselring et al. | May 1985 | A |
4588373 | Tonon et al. | May 1986 | A |
4673349 | Abe et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4726767 | Nakajima | Feb 1988 | A |
4752213 | Grochowski et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4850862 | Bjerklie | Jul 1989 | A |
4899696 | Kennedy et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5248255 | Morioka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5275552 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5326257 | Taylor et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5380192 | Hamos | Jan 1995 | A |
5431557 | Hamos | Jul 1995 | A |
5439372 | Duret et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441402 | Reuther et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458484 | Ripka | Oct 1995 | A |
5460512 | Lifshits et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5511516 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5641282 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5667374 | Nutcher et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5713206 | McWhirter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718573 | Knight et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5846067 | Nishiyama et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5890886 | Doker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5957682 | Kamal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6065963 | Dewaegheneire et al. | May 2000 | A |
6140658 | Jarvinen | Oct 2000 | A |
6159001 | Kushch et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6499990 | Zink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6997701 | Volkert et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7241137 | Leinemann et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020155403 | Griffin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040058290 | Mauzey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040081933 | St. Charles et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040197719 | Chung et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060008755 | Leinemann et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060141413 | Masten et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080268387 | Saito et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090053664 | Staller et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100077731 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110027734 | Hartwick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110076628 | Miura et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120164590 | Mach | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120231398 | Carpentier et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20150276212 | Karkow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276213 | Karkow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276217 | Karkow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150276220 | Karkow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150285491 | Karkow et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150316261 | Karkow et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150330625 | Karkow et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150369477 | Karkow et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1506609 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101514815 | Aug 2009 | CN |
102032569 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102853424 | Jan 2013 | CN |
S 59112111 | Jun 1984 | JP |
06-026624 | Feb 1994 | JP |
07-083076 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2006-275482 | Oct 2006 | JP |
WO 2015042614 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015042615 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015054323 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO 2015061760 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO 2015112950 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 26, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016626 filed Feb. 14, 2014. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 3, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016632 filed Feb. 14, 2014. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 27, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/016622 filed Feb. 14, 2014. |
EPO Extended Search Report and Search Opinion of EP Application No. 14752076.1 dated Oct. 27, 2016. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/016628 dated Feb. 14, 2014. |
Arnold Schwarzenegger, A Low NOx Porous Ceramics Burner Performance Study, California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research Program, Dec. 2007, San Diego State University Foundation. |
Fric, Thomas F., “Effects of Fuel-Air Unmixedness on NOx Emissions,” Sep.-Oct. 1993. Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 708-713. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180080648 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61765022 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14763271 | US | |
Child | 15823419 | US |