1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to cooking appliances having gas burners with ports aligned to a predetermined relationship with adjacent structures to contribute to piloting of flame kernel patterns.
2. Background Art
Many previously known cooktops using gas burners include circular burners in order to provide a ring of ports that distribute heat at a consistent radial dimension from the burner. Such burners form a circular ring of flame kernels adjacent the outlet of the ports in the burner. Typically, the radial alignment of the ports limits interaction of the flame kernels generated at the ports, and as a result, limits the turndown ratio, the ratio of a burner's energy output per unit time (power, expressed in BTU per/hour) at maximum gas flow rate divided by the power at the minimum sustainable gas flow rate. The resulting flame kernel is then limited by the size of the port, and the limited range of gas flow rates, and is not otherwise controlled for stability. Operation of the burner at the flow rates beyond a limited range within the maximum and minimum flow rates causes lifting of the kernel away from the outlet of the port or flashback in which the kernel germinates within the port, within the primary gas passageway communicating with the port or within both. Such flame kernels are unstable and may be extinguished under variable ambient conditions. Such reactions may reduce the effective heating capacity of the burner under normal operating conditions.
In order to reduce cold spots that may occur centrally over the circular burners and within the ring of flame kernels, some burners have been formed with other configurations. For example, barbeque grills may employ elongated tube burners or U-shaped tube burners to distribute flame kernels throughout a cooking chamber. However, while such burners change the effective heating area in the cooking chamber, the ports in the previously known tube burners may be subject to the same problems of flame kernel instability. Moreover, although it has been known to cover the burner tubes with sear bars or the like in order to adjust heat distribution throughout the cooking chamber flow patterns in the cooking chamber may exacerbate flame instability. In addition, although cooktops have been known to be sealed to prevent the leakage of drips from a cooking surface entering the ports from which the flame kernels emanate, the use of previously known low profile burner structures to improve the stability of cooking vessels and reduce flame exposure often interferes with flame kernel stability.
The present invention overcomes the above mentioned disadvantages by providing a method for improving turn down ratio in a cooking appliance, as well as providing burner constructions and installations that generate flame kernel stability, through piloting. As used in this application, the term piloting is used to refer to contributions to control of the formation and the positioning of flame kernels as they emanate from the burner port outlets.
In general, a burner body has at least one burner port in communication with the primary air passage and having a defined alignment with respect to an adjacent structure that guides the formation of a flame kernel at the outlet of the port. The adjacent structure may be on the body, for example, a burner cap, on a separate element or be created by the orientation of an adjacent burner port or ports. For example, ports aligned for overlapping kernel generation at the outlets of the adjacent ports, or a port having an axis aligned at a converging angle with respect to an axis of the adjacent port outlet may provide interport piloting. In addition, adjacent ports may be positioned within an interport piloting distance of the flame kernel or aligned to provide an overlapping kernel generation at the outlets of the ports. Furthermore, the flame kernels may be stabilized by the burner construction to introduce self-piloting or by the interaction of the adjacent surfaces or shapes that may act as flame holders and stabilize the flame kernels.
In one illustrated embodiment, a multiple fingered burner includes multiple ports along each finger, a plurality of the fingers including ports that are angled, preferably acutely, away from a hub connecting the fingers to introduce interport piloting of the ports extending along the sides and ends of the fingers. In another illustrated embodiment, the adjacent structure for piloting can be provided by an external member of the appliance such as a sear bar of gas cooking grill, a flame rod or a part of the burner itself such as a lip of the burner cap extending over the burner ports. Nevertheless, regardless of the structure chosen to provide piloting for the ports, the outlet is positioned within an interport piloting distance for a flame kernel emitted from the outlet of the burner port. Moreover, regardless of the construction, the apparatus provides a method for improving turn down ratios and cooking efficiency by aligning at least one port to a defined alignment with respect to adjacent structure that guides formation of a flame kernel at an outlet of the port. When the adjacent structure is another port and the flame kernel that emanates from the other port's outlet, overlapping kernel generation may be employed to improve the stability of the flame kernels, although exterior or burner structures may likewise be positioned at a piloting distance from the outlet in order to enhance flame kernel stability.
The present invention will be more clearly understood by reference to the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout the views and in which
a is an enlarged partial sectional view taken along the line 2—2 in
a is an enlarged side elevational view of the burner in
b-6d are enlarged side elevational views similar to
Referring first to
In addition, the cooktop 12 carries a rough-in box 19 that encloses the cooktop control and burners for installation in a rough-in opening in a cabinet or counter top. The rough-in box 19 enclosure preferably includes a bottom wall to prevent spillage through cooktop openings 11 from soiling the interior of the cabinet. In addition, the bottom of the rough-in box 19 provides support for a bracket 86 used to support a jet holder 82 as described in greater detail below.
Referring now to
The burner head 20 includes a support for a burner cap 40, for example, sockets for receiving legs 36 of the burner cap 40. The burner cap 40 includes a walled enclosure with an upper surface, the wall enclosing the chamber 30 and having a contour configured to cover the ports 32 with a lip 42 extending beyond the port outlets over each of the fingers 22 in the burner head 20. In the Preferred Embodiment, the upper surface of the burner cap 40 includes a plurality of recesses 43 (
The burner 14 also includes a base 50 having a base wall 60 and a support wall 52 including raised legs 54 that support the burner head 20 above the base 50. The support legs are preferably located at a position radially inwardly from the peripheral wall 28 of the burner head 20 as shown. The legs 54 define intermediate openings 46 that are arranged throughout the periphery of the base 50 for communicating with recesses that form ports 38 in the lower portion of the peripheral wall 28 of the burner head 20.
In addition, the burner base 50 also includes a central aperture 56 peripherally defined by a venturi seat 58. The base wall 60 conforms with the shape of the opening 17 in the cooktop for support of a burner 14 at the burner location. Preferably, a flange on the base 50, for example, the peripheral edge of wall 60, is slightly larger than the size of the opening 17 so that the base 50 of the burner seals against the surface panel 16 and prevents leakage of food products, overspills and the like from falling into the burner and related parts carried in the interior of the appliance 10. Similarly, the burner base 50 includes at least one recess 43 for protruding portions 45 (
As also shown in
The burner base 50 retains the grate 18, the burner head 20 and the cap 40 in position by receiving portions of the legs on grate 18. Connector leg 44 and portion 45 are received in the recesses 42 and 43 in the cap 40 and the base 52, respectively. The legs 54 and 44 rest in sockets to restrict lateral displacement of the grate 18, but permit disassembly for cleaning once the grate 18 is removed by lifting it above the stacked burner parts 40, 20 and 50.
The burner ports 32 are in fluid communication with a primary air passage 31 that couples the supply of gas and air mixture to the ports regardless of the structures that form the passageway. In the preferred embodiment, a mounting flange 70 at the end of a venturi tube 72 is seated upon the venturi seat 58 (
The lower end of the venturi tube body 76 is received in a jet holder 82. The jet holder 82 is carried by a wall 84 of a bracket 86 supported by the bottom wall of the rough-in box 19. The jet holder 82 includes a retainer sleeve 88 including an annular shoulder 90 abutting one side of the wall 84 while threaded portion 92 extends through an opening 85 in the wall 84. The threaded portion 92 receives a nut 94 to lock the jet holder 82 to the bracket 86.
The jet holder 82 positions a gas nozzle 198 for introducing gas for mixture with air and entry into the venturi passage 74 as is well known in the prior art. The nozzle is coupled to a supply of gas 102 and discharges the fuel to a mixing zone 200 adjacent the entry to the venturi passage 74.
When each burner 14 is installed as shown in
Referring to
Moreover, if the axes 180 of the ports 32 are aligned to be converging, the compact converging flame kernels force the combustion to be completed in a reduced volume of space. As a result, smaller sized burners may emit greater heat than was previously possible, particularly where heat transfer efficiency may be improved to a small pot carried on the grate 18 over the burner. In addition, particularly where multiple fingered burners are employed, more heat is transferred closer to the center of the pot than was possible with the previously known circularly shaped burners. Moreover, the compact flame pattern provides the ability to operate with minimal head heights, that is the height at which cooking utensils may be supported above the top surface 16 of the cooking appliance in order to be positioned over the burners. Minimal head heights translate into the ability to operate burners under lower grates. Lower grates means that port stability can be maximized while at the same time providing clean, efficient combustion. These design features result in increased burner port stability, shorter, more stable flame kernels, better turn down ratios and the ability to operate the appliance with various and different types of gasses. Moreover, these flame patterns improve compatibility with thermocouples, spark igniters, flame sensors, and down draft vent systems. Moreover, the burner ports 32 may be sized differently in order to further modify the flame kernel size and the heating efficiency in accordance with the present invention. Moreover, burner ports 32 that are aligned at an angle to the wall thickness through the walls of the burner as shown in
Referring now to
A more even heat distribution is also contributed to by the heated radiant panel 98. The distributor or radiant panel 98 preferably comprises one or more panels 99 of undulating shape, preferably formed with domes formed by parabolically rounded curves. A plurality of domes formed by the parabolic curves are coupled together by troughs, in a preferred radiant panel shape. The troughs are preferably apertured to control drainage of juices emanating from food cooked on a grid plate 100 formed of a plurality of grate panels 110 supported above the radiant panel 98. The generally parabolic shape of each of the dome walls provides a blunted, radiused peak at which the juices remain exposed to heat transfer for an extended period for vaporization of the juices. Preferably, the flame ports are positioned at the lowest portions of the radiant panel 98 so that rising heat converges at the peak of the dome where the blunted surface area maintains contact for heat transmission that evaporates most juices, grease, and fats. In addition, the radiant panel may act like a flame rod or other target structure having a defined alignment with the ports to provide an adjacent structure that guides the formation and positioning of a flame kernel at the ports. However, the burner ports in the illustrated embodiment are self-piloting as discusses below. Nevertheless, the dome surface drops at a steeper angle below the peak of the dome where the trough can collect and drain the unevaporated juices along controlled paths, preferably spaced from and not interfering with the flame kernels, without combustion and reducing flare-up.
The heating distribution control is also provided by a plurality of apertures 112 through the sides of the radiant panel walls, preferably positioned adjacent the ends of the dome-forming panels 98 adjacent the walls of the cooking chamber. The various sizes and shapes of the apertures, as well as the positions and the patterns of the apertures, control heat circulation throughout the chamber. Preferably, each radiant panel is supported by studs 102 protruding from the end walls of the cooking chamber. The studs, in the preferred embodiment, are spaced apart for receipt within two of the peaks in each panel, registering with studs 102 supported on an opposite wall of the grill housing, to stably support the panels in the grill between the cooking grid and the burners in the cooking chamber. A deflector plate 104 below each burner has inclined surfaces to control and cool the flow of cooking juices to the drip pan supported on the bottom of the cooking chamber. As a result, flare-ups of unburned fats and greases are reduced over previously known cooking grills with sear bars, ceramic briquettes and the like, while improving flavor due to searing and juice evaporation, and reducing cooking time with improved heat distribution.
When burners including an integrated, cast, grease shield may be used, the integrated grease shield may also form an adjacent surface that guides the formation and positioning of flame kernels at the ports of the burners. Such a structure may preferably include an overhanging lip such as the lip 42 of burners 14 described previously. The panels 98 may still be installed and are supported in a position that covers the burners for reducing flare-up activity when cooking fatty, greasy foods. The accelerating slope of the curved side surfaces of the radiant panel causes the fatty liquids and grease to vaporize as they strike and are retained upon the less steeply sloped, curved portion. Preferably, the tangent of the curves at the peak of the dome is greater than 90° to slow removal of the juice away from the peak at which heat energy converges. As any excess liquids which are not vaporized drip downward, the surface becomes more steeply curved causing liquids to drip along controlled paths through the slots and openings at the bottom of troughs formed between adjacent, curved side surfaces of the radiant. The ends of the panels 99 may be conveniently positioned adjacent side ports or top ports of the burners as shown in
Referring now to
Having thus described the present invention, many modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which it pertains without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined in the pending claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/292,690 filed Apr. 15, 1999 abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1125726 | Ruppel | Jan 1915 | A |
1214819 | Parks | Feb 1917 | A |
1285733 | Kennedy | Nov 1918 | A |
1781386 | Harner et al. | Nov 1930 | A |
1781623 | Zink | Nov 1930 | A |
1806800 | Herrenbruck | May 1931 | A |
1879776 | Toelle | Sep 1932 | A |
1896082 | Harper | Feb 1933 | A |
1921778 | Roberts | Aug 1933 | A |
1971449 | Harper | Aug 1934 | A |
2074966 | Kahn | Mar 1937 | A |
2081507 | Reedy | May 1937 | A |
2138925 | Kahn | Dec 1938 | A |
2320754 | Sherman | Jun 1943 | A |
2485145 | Evans | Oct 1949 | A |
3399024 | Branson | Aug 1968 | A |
3592180 | Kweller et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3597135 | Kweller et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3627462 | Lotter | Dec 1971 | A |
3825404 | De Gouville | Jul 1974 | A |
4565523 | Berkelder | Jan 1986 | A |
4572154 | Schweitzer | Feb 1986 | A |
4827898 | Liao et al. | May 1989 | A |
5133658 | Gouville et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5328357 | Riehl | Jul 1994 | A |
5391076 | Home | Feb 1995 | A |
5397234 | Kwiatek | Mar 1995 | A |
5405263 | Gerdes et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5468145 | Ferlin | Nov 1995 | A |
5628302 | Schatz et al. | May 1997 | A |
5765542 | Fey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5899681 | Maughan | May 1999 | A |
D414377 | Huang | Sep 1999 | S |
5954492 | Lannes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6030207 | Saleri | Feb 2000 | A |
6082994 | Grandveau et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6146132 | Harneit | Nov 2000 | A |
6263868 | Koch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299436 | Huang | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6371754 | Haynes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 121 103 | Apr 1971 | DE |
719982 | Jul 1996 | EP |
2153988 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2240168 | Jul 1991 | GB |
54145030 | Nov 1979 | JP |
55-33528 | Mar 1980 | JP |
55102808 | Aug 1980 | JP |
5952113 | Mar 1984 | JP |
60245929 | Dec 1985 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030024525 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09292690 | Apr 1999 | US |
Child | 10256531 | US |