The field of the invention is flow control devices for straight through flow controlled by directing excess flow out a lateral port and more particularly where the flow orifice and recirculation flow path are above the lateral exit port when there is no lateral flow out the lateral exit port.
Conventional oil and gas drilling typically includes pumping a quantity of fluid through a pipe or drill string to a drill bit for cutting the hole in the rock. The fluid is then circulated back up though the wellbore in the annular or outer section of the hole. Drilling fluid is beneficial to the drilling process since it clears away pieces of rock that have been cut from the bottom of the wellbore. Without this cleaning action the cut pieces of rock would accumulate near the drill bit and interfere with further drilling. Apart from a drilling application there are also milling applications such as milling out frack plugs after the fracturing operation is completed.
In general, the higher level of fluid flow that a drilling operation can achieve, the better that cut pieces of rock or “cuttings” are cleared from the bottom of the wellbore. However, there are several factors that limit the fluid flow level. One of these factors is the amount of pressure that it takes to pump a large amount of fluid. As the drill string becomes longer or narrower, the resistance to pumping a given amount of fluid increases, which increases the need for higher pressure. With any fluid pump set up there is a limit to the amount of pressure that can be overcome in order to make the fluid flow. Accordingly, the size or type of pump can limit the available flow rate.
Another limiting factor is the capability of the downhole mud motor. Mud motors are used to make the rock cutting drill bit rotate faster than the drill pipe that it is connected to. For example, a drilling operator may desire to drill while holding the drill string stationary, or may want to rotate the drill bit faster to achieve a higher rate of rock penetration. The mud motor works in a manner similar to a turbine in that the mud that flows through the motor turns a rotor that is connected to the drill bit. Energy from the pressure of the fluid flow is converted into rotational work by the drill bit. Mud motors are usually designed such that there is a maximum amount of flow that the motors are designed to handle. Forcing excess fluid through a mud motor can damage the motor and inhibit the drilling process.
The desire to flow higher volumes of drilling fluid through the well and the need to limit the volume flow rate due to the constraints of the motor can be conflicting. It would be desirable to flow as much fluid as is desired while ensuring that the motor did not experience a rate of flow higher than its design criteria.
A conventional solution to this problem is to form annular ports in the drill string above the mud motor. By choosing the size of the ports, the amount of flow that exits through the ports and the amount of flow that continues on through the drill string into the mud motor can be approximated.
A problem with this technique is that the amount of fluid that exits through the ports varies depending on the back pressure from the mud motor. The back pressure from the mud motor is a factor of the torque that it delivers. Thus, the more torque that is needed or generated by the motor, the higher the back pressure from the motor, which diverts more fluid through the ports in the sides of the drill string. More diverted flow means less fluid is transferred down through the motor. Less fluid to the motor reduces its torque and power, which can induce a situation where the motor stalls and needs more torque to overcome its bound condition. Conversely, an off-bottom situation where there is relatively low amounts of back pressure generated by the motor because there is no drilling torque resistance can result in a higher amount of fluid passing through the motor and a lower amount of fluid exiting the drill string. This too is problematic since a low torque situation causes the motor to spin faster at a given flow rate. Increased amounts of flow will only exacerbate this situation.
Some motor manufacturers attempt to solve this problem by drilling a hole through the rotor of the mud motor so that some fluid may pass through the tool without generating torque or causing damage to the motor. Unfortunately, since the drilled hole is static and does not change its shape to account for differing flow or pressure conditions, it is subject to the same limitations as the previously described method. Thus, improvements in controlling drill string fluid flow continue to be of interest.
In one design previously introduced all the flow goes though the orifice that is in a movable sleeve that is spring biased. Increasing flow rate has to go through the orifice before reaching a lateral port out of the housing that is opening with translation of a piston that supports the orifice. The design is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,263,969 and its shortcoming is that all the flow including the motor bypass flow has to pass through the orifice. This design for that reason has limited capacity and requires additional pumping horsepower to push the inline and circulated flow through the orifice.
Another design is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 9,328,576. In this design the orifice is mounted in a movable piston such that increase in flow displaces the piston and the orifice in the piston below the housing circulation port so that some bypass flow can exit a lateral housing port. This design promotes end erosion of the piston in the less than wide open bypass position, as illustrated in
What is needed and is provided in the below described preferred embodiment is a design that has a parallel path through the top of the piston for flow into the mud motor and for bypassing flow. The bypass channel can be made broad, such as a crescent shape, and multiple exit nozzles can be directed into an annular shaped plenum that leads to multiple circumferentially spaced outlets. A sacrificial protective ring can be placed to define the plenum and protect a piston seal assembly from erosion. The design is enabled with the use of additive manufacturing to make the needed shapes in the most cost effective manner with known technology. These and other aspects of the design will be more readily understood from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is to be determined from the appended claims.
Embodiments of a system, method and apparatus for controlling fluid flow through a drill string are disclosed. For example, an apparatus may include a housing having an axis, a radial wall with a bore extending axially therethrough, and an aperture formed in the radial wall. The aperture is in fluid communication with the bore. A piston may be located inside the housing and have an orifice configured to permit axial fluid flow through the housing. A spring may be located in the housing and be configured to axially bias the piston to a closed position.
In some embodiments, the piston is movable from the closed position wherein the piston is configured to close the aperture in the housing to substantially block radial fluid flow therethrough when axial fluid flow through the orifice is insufficient to overcome a spring force of the spring, and an open position wherein the piston is configured to permit radial fluid flow through the aperture when axial fluid flow through the orifice is sufficient to overcome the spring force of the spring and axially move the piston.
In other embodiments, a method of controlling fluid flow through a drill string may include operating the drill string to drill a hole in an earthen formation; pumping fluid through the drill string to a mud motor such that substantially all of the fluid flows axially to the mud motor and substantially none of the fluid is radially diverted out of the drill string; and then increasing a flow rate of the fluid such that some of the fluid is radially diverted out of the drill string before reaching the mud motor, and a remainder of the fluid is flows axially to the mud motor.
In still other embodiments, a method of controlling fluid flow through a drill string may include operating a drill string to drill a hole in an earthen formation; pumping fluid through the drill string; closing a piston in the drill string to direct substantially all of the fluid to a mud motor; and then changing a parameter of the drill string such that the piston moves to an open position allowing at least a portion of the fluid to be diverted away from the mud motor.
Referring to
Lateral passage 19 is shown as being crescent shaped. The reason it is preferably crescent shaped is to provide maximum flow area around the internal passage 19. There is a gradual transition from the crescent shape to outlet to minimize erosion. This could also be accomplished by making both passage 19 and 24 crescent shaped, or making passage 19 crescent shaped and passage 24 circular. Another possibility would be for one of both of the passages 19 and 24 to be oval instead of circular.
Life of seals 30 and 32 can be reduced if piston 16 rapidly oscillates in housing 10 because of inconsistent flow rates through the piston. Seal damage can be reduced by controlling how quickly fluid flows in and out of chamber 41 between extension tube 36 and housing 10. By creating a tight radial clearance 39 between extension tube 36 and housing 10 high frequency movement of piston 16 is damped because fluid entering and leaving chamber 41 is restricted by the tight clearance. Passage 24 can be totally independent of passage 18 to the top of piston 16 or intersect passage 18 near the top end of the piston 16 so that incremental flow as piston 16 moves goes through passage 24 as ports 26 and 34 come into alignment. At flow rates above a predetermined level, typically over 4 barrels a minute (for a 2⅞″ motor with higher flow rates contemplated for larger motors), displacement of piston 16 begins until travel stop and rotational lock 20 halts axial movement with the outlet 26 aligned with wall opening 34. Although a single passage 24 leading to an opening 26 that ultimately aligns with opening 34 is illustrated, more than one path out of the housing 10 is contemplated as will be later described. The orifice 18 may be a removable disc or a carbide nozzle with a passage through it so that it can be replaced if it wears or it may be integral with passage 19 through the piston 16 that can be lined with a removable sleeve or unlined. In any event, the orifice remains higher than the wall opening 34 even in the full bypass flow out of port 34 into the surrounding annular space. While the recirculation flow out opening or openings 34 is variable the flow to the mud motor that is not shown remains constant. The flow straight through to the mud motor and laterally out the housing 10 both go through the piston 16. Preferably, the total flow rate should be increased so that if there is to be bypass flow out port or ports 34 the axial travel of the piston 16 should be at the stop represented by 20 so that openings 26 line up with openings 34. Variations of the
The various described embodiments split flow between straight through and recirculation so that as the flow increases there are two distinct paths and recirculated flow avoids the straight through flow restricting path. While all flow goes through the piston, the flow is split within the piston in discrete straight through and recirculating paths. The piston with these discrete paths is additively manufactured to allow multiple exit nozzles for the recirculating path that can discharge into aligned outlet ports in the surrounding housing or into a plenum between the piston and the outer housing where flow can exit out radially or can be redirected at least once to a nearby housing exit port. The discrete recirculation path can be crescent shaped to maximize the number of outlets particularly in the smaller sizes.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3597930 | Rochelle | Aug 1971 | A |
4310058 | Bourgoyne, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4573496 | Richard | Mar 1986 | A |
4657082 | Ringgenberg | Apr 1987 | A |
6263969 | Stoesz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6322102 | Rau | Nov 2001 | B1 |
9328576 | Cramer et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20160298430 | Beranger | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20190048684 | Kao | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190136653 A1 | May 2019 | US |