The invention relates to display devices. More specifically, the invention describes a method and apparatus for using driving LCD panel drive electronics.
Overview
Until most recently, almost all TVs in use today rely on a device known as the cathode ray tube, or CRT, to display their images. In order to display an image on the entire screen, electronic circuits inside the TV use magnetic deflection coils (a horizontal deflection coil to move the beam from left to right and a vertical deflection coil to move the beam up and down) to move the electron beam in a “raster scan” pattern across and down the screen.
In order to display an image on a CRT display screen, each image is transmitted as a sequence of frames each of which includes a number of horizontal scan lines. Typically, time reference signals are provided in order to divide the video signal into horizontal scan lines and frames. These reference signals include a VSYNC signal that indicates the beginning of a frame and an HSYNC signal that indicates the beginning of a next source scan line. In this way, the image is divided into a number of points where each point is displayed as a pixel having a corresponding pixel clock that specifies the rate at which pixels are generated (in pixels per second). Therefore, in order to display video data from a video source, such as a CPU, DVD player, etc., the video data is processed by a conventional video processor unit (VPU) that converts the incoming video data (at a native format) to a video data at a video display format at a clock rate determined by a memory unit into which the data is temporarily stored.
A cathode ray tube (CRT) controller unit then converts the display formatted video data to CRT compatible display timing by adding timing and control signals (such Hsync and Vsync) regardless of the whether or not the display unit is a cathode ray tube based display or a fixed pixel display such as an LCD. In this way, the CRT controller unit converts the video data that is read from the video source to a pixel clock rate Φpixel based solely upon the assumption that the display requires CRT type signals. It should be noted therefore, that strictly based upon CRT legacy considerations, the incoming video signal has been converted from a native video clock Φnative to a pixel clock Φpixel and then sent to the display unit at a link rate LR that must be faster than the pixel clock Φpixel. At the display, the video signal must then be processed again by a pixel clock regenerator circuit in order for the video data to be properly displayed.
Therefore, even in those situations where a pixel clock rate is not meaningful (such as with fixed pixel displays, such as LCDs), conventional video processors require that a CRT controller unit force a video signal that will not be displayed on a CRT type display to conform to legacy CRT requirements.
Therefore, in those cases where a display is not CRT based, a video processor that does not enforce CRT legacy requirements is desirable.
What is provided is a video processor architecture embodied as a method, apparatus, and system suitable for implementation with digital displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCDs), that provides a video signal that is directly related to a memory clock rate and independent of a pixel rate.
In a video processor unit, a method of providing a video data stream at a clock rate that is independent of a pixel clock rate. Receiving native video data from a video source at a native clock rate, storing the video data in a memory unit, reading selected portions of the video data at a memory clock rate, rasterizing the selected video data, packetizing the rasterized video data, sending the packetized video data to a display unit by way of a link at a link rate, wherein the link rate is directly related to the memory clock rate.
In another embodiment, a video processor for displaying video data on a non-CRT type display unit coupled thereto by way of a link is disclosed that includes a video memory unit having an associated memory clock rate and a video packet transmitter unit for transmitting the video data to the non-CRT type display in the form of video data packets at a link rate that is directly related to the memory clock rate Φmemory such that the video processor does not require a CRT controller unit.
In still another embodiment, a configurable video processor for providing displayable video data to a display unit coupled thereto is disclosed. The video processor includes a CRTC circuit, a selectable CRT controller circuit coupled to the CRTC circuit and a raster engine coupled to the selectable CRT controller circuit. The processor also includes a display interrogator unit coupled to the display unit and the selectable CRT controller circuit for determining a display type corresponding to the display unit, wherein when the display type is a non-CRT type display, the display interrogator unit sends a first signal to the selectable CRT controller circuit that disables (if enabled) the CRTC circuit such that the displayable video data is sent directly to the display unit from the raster engine and wherein when the display interrogator determines that the display is a CRT type display, then the display interrogator sends a second signal to the selectable CRT controller circuit that enables the CRTC circuit (if disabled) such that the displayable video data is processed by the CRTC circuit prior to being sent to the display unit by way of the link.
Reference will now be made in detail to a particular embodiment of the invention an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the particular embodiment, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described embodiment. To the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Until most recently, almost all TVs in use today rely on a device known as the cathode ray tube, or CRT, to display their images. In order to display an image on the entire screen, electronic circuits inside the TV use magnetic deflection coils (a horizontal deflection coil to move the beam from left to right and a vertical deflection coil to move the beam up and down) to move the electron beam in a “raster scan” pattern across and down the screen. In order to display video data from a video source, such as a CPU, DVD player, etc., the video data provided by a video source at a native clock rate Φnative is processed by a conventional video processor unit (VPU) by storing the video data in a video memory unit until such time as it is read from the memory at a memory clock rate Φmemory and processed by a raster engine that converts the video data native format to a video signal having a displayable format based upon the characteristics of the display unit for which the image will be displayed.
A cathode ray tube (CRT) controller unit then converts the video signal using display timing by adding timing and control signals (such Hsync and Vsync) regardless of the whether or not the display unit is a cathode ray tube based display or a fixed pixel display such as an LCD. In this way, the CRT controller unit converts the video data that is read from the memory unit at the memory clock rate Φmemory to a pixel clock rate Φpixel based solely upon the assumption that the display requires CRT type signals. Once the CRT controller unit has added the CRT based control and timing signals, the video signal is then passed by way of a link to the display unit at a link rate LR. Therefore, even in those situations where a pixel clock rate is not meaningful (such as with fixed pixel displays, such as LCDs), conventional video processors require that a CRT controller unit force a video signal that will not be displayed on a CRT type display to conform to legacy CRT requirements.
Accordingly, the invention describes a method, system, and apparatus that does not enforce CRT legacy requirements for those situations where a video is to be displayed on a non-CRT type display unit, such as an LCD. More specifically, the inventive video processor does not force the video signal to conform to a pixel clock but preserves the memory clock rate by transmitting the video data in video data packets at a link rate that is directly related to the memory clock rate. In this way, the inventive video processor does not require a CRT controller unit for those situations where a display unit so connected is not a CRT type display. In some embodiments, the inventive processor is dedicated to a fixed pixel display and therefore does away with the CRT controller and associated circuitry entirely whereas in other embodiments, in order to maintain compatibility with all possible display environments, a selectable CRT controller circuit is included. The selection (or de-selection) of the CRT controller and associated circuitry is based upon a query of the display attributes during an initialization process whereby the video processor queries the display whether or not it is a CRT type display.
The invention will now be described in terms of a representative LCD panel. However, it should be noted that any digital fixed pixel display, be it LCD, plasma, DLP based, is also suitable and therefore the use of an LCD panel in the following description should not be considered to limit either the scope or the intent of the invention. It should be noted that the invention is also well suited to be used in conjunction with any packet based video display interface such as described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,794 entitled “PACKET BASED VIDEO DISPLAY INTERFACE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF” by Kobayashi filed Dec. 3, 2003 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,103 entitled “USING PACKET TRANSFER FOR DRIVING LCD PANEL DRIVER ELECTRONICS” by Kobayashi filed concurrently with this application each of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Accordingly,
Once received, the video data V1 is then stored (by way of a write/modify operation) in a video memory unit 204 coupled to the interface 202 at a memory space location corresponding to the video window being displayed. In most cases, the memory unit 204 is of a size sufficient to store at least a full frame of video data In order to display the video data stored in the memory unit 204, selected portions of the video data V1 are read from the memory 204 at a memory clock rate Φmemory and processed by a raster engine 206 that converts the video data native format to a video signal V2 having a displayable format based upon the characteristics of a display unit 208. For example, if the native format is 8 bit video data and the display unit 208 requires 24 bit video data, then the raster engine 206 has the option of utilizing a color look up table (CLUT) 210 in the conversion process.
Once the video signal V2 has been properly formatted for display on the display unit 208, a packetizer 212 packetizes the video signal V2 into a number of data packets 214 in the form of a data stream 215. The data stream 215 is transmitted to the display 208 by way of a link 216 at a transmission rate referred to as a link rate LR that is independent of the native stream rate Φnative of the video data but is, however, directly related to the memory clock rate Φmemory (i.e., LR=α×Φmemory). In the described embodiment, the speed, or link rate, of the link 216 can be configured to include a number of logical data channels (not shown) that can be adjusted to compensate for link conditions. For example, at 2.5 Gbps per channel, the link 216 can support SXGA 60 Hz with a color depth of 18 bits per pixel over a single channel. It should be noted that a reduction in the number of channels reduces not only the cost of interconnect, but also reduces the power consumption which is an important consideration (and desirable) for power sensitive applications such as portable devices and the like. However, by increasing the number of channels to four, the link 216 can support WQSXGA (3200×2048 image resolution) with a color depth of 24-bits per pixel at 60 Hz. or QSXGA (2560×2048) with a color depth of 18-bits per pixel at 60 Hz, without data compression. Even at the lowest rate of 1.0 Gbps per channel, only two channels are required to support an uncompressed HDTV (i.e., 1080i or 720p) data stream.
It should be noted, however, that the bandwidth of the link 216 must be greater than the aggregate bandwidth of all data stream(s) being transmitted over the link 216. In this way, the data packets 214 are received by and appropriately processed by a properly configured display 208 an example of which is described below without the need to generate a pixel clock at either the VPU 200 or the display 208. In one embodiment, the VPU 200 can optionally include a switch coupled to a CRT controller unit that provides the necessary CRT control signals and timing only in those cases where the display is a legacy CRT type display. In this way, the VPU can be used for any type display.
In order to transmit the video data, the VPU 200 forms the data stream 215 that includes a number of the data packets 214 which are then received and processed by a display interface 322. In the described embodiment, the data packets 214 are then forwarded to directly to the data latches 314 included in the column driver 306 in such a way that all the video data (in the form of pixel data) used for the display of a particular frame line n of the video frame is provided to the data latches 314 within a line period τ. Therefore, once each data latch 314 has appropriate pixel data stored therein, the data driver 306 drive appropriate ones of the TFTs 312 in the LCD array 302.
Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described, it should be understood that the present invention may be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or the scope of the present invention. The present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
While this invention has been described in terms of a preferred embodiment, there are alterations, permutations, and equivalents that fall within the scope of this invention. It should also be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and apparatus of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the invention be interpreted as including all such alterations, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
This patent application takes priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to (i) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/504,060 filed on Sep. 18, 2003, entitled “DIGITAL/ANALOG VIDEO INTERCONNECT AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF” by Kobayashi, and (ii) U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/562,737 filed on Apr. 15, 2004, entitled “BYPASSING PIXEL CLOCK GENEARATION AND CRTC CIRCUITS IN A GRAPHICS CONTROLLER CHIP” by Kobayashi each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. This application is also related to the following co-pending U.S. Patent applications each of which are incorporated by reference, (i) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,802, entitled “METHOD OF ADAPTIVELY CONNECTING A VIDEO SOURCE AND A VIDEO DISPLAY” naming Kobayashi as inventor; (ii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,438, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EFFICIENT TRANSMISSION OF MULTIMEDIA DATA PACKETS” naming Kobayashi as inventor; (iii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,440, entitled “METHOD OF OPTIMIZING MULTIMEDIA PACKET TRANSMISSION RATE”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; (iv) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/727,131, entitled “USING AN AUXILARY CHANNEL FOR VIDEO MONITOR TRAINING”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; (v) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,350, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING MULTIMEDIA DATA PACKET OVERHEAD”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; (vi) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,362, entitled “PACKET BASED CLOSED LOOP VIDEO DISPLAY INTERFACE WITH PERIODIC STATUS CHECKS”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; (vii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,895, entitled “MINIMIZING BUFFER REQUIREMENTS IN A DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEM”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; and (viii) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,441, entitled “VIDEO INTERFACE ARRANGED TO PROVIDE PIXEL DATA INDEPENDENT OF A LINK CHARACTER CLOCK”, naming Kobayashi as inventor; (ix) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,934, entitled “ENUMERATION METHOD FOR THE LINK CLOCK RATE AND THE PIXEL/AUDIO CLOCK RATE”, naming Kobayashi as inventor, and (x) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/726,794, entitled “PACKET BASED VIDEO DISPLAY INTERFACE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF” naming Kobayashi as inventor. This application is also related to the following co-pending applications: (x) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,103, entitled “USING PACKET TRANSFER FOR DRIVING LCD PANEL DRIVER ELECTRONICS” filed Jul. 29, 2004, naming Kobayashi as inventor; and (xi) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,085, entitled “PACKET BASED STREAM TRANSPORT SCHEDULER AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF” filed Jul. 29, 2004, naming Kobayashi as inventor.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4479142 | Buschman et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4796203 | Roberts | Jan 1989 | A |
4868557 | Perlman | Sep 1989 | A |
5245612 | Kachi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258983 | Lane et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5369775 | Yamasaki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5425101 | Woo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5515296 | Agarwal | May 1996 | A |
5541919 | Yong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5608418 | McNally | Mar 1997 | A |
5615376 | Ranganathan | Mar 1997 | A |
5625379 | Reinert et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629715 | Zenda | May 1997 | A |
5670973 | Bassetti et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5739803 | Neugebauer | Apr 1998 | A |
5745837 | Fuhrmann | Apr 1998 | A |
5786844 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790083 | Bassetti | Aug 1998 | A |
5801776 | Tamura et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805173 | Glennon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838875 | Cho et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852630 | Langberg et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5909465 | Bottomley et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918002 | Klemets et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926155 | Arai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940137 | Hulvey | Aug 1999 | A |
5949437 | Clark | Sep 1999 | A |
6005861 | Humpleman | Dec 1999 | A |
6020901 | Lavelle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038000 | Hurst, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049316 | Nolan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049769 | Holmes et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069929 | Yabe et al. | May 2000 | A |
6151334 | Kim et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151632 | Chadda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154225 | Kou et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175573 | Togo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177922 | Schiefer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219736 | Klingman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223089 | Page | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249319 | Post | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6326961 | Lin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330605 | Christensen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337964 | Inami et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6353594 | Tooker et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356260 | Montalbo | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6437768 | Kubota et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441857 | Wicker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446130 | Grapes | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477252 | Faber et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6542967 | Major | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543053 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545688 | Loveridge et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577303 | Kim | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587480 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598161 | Kluttz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600469 | Nukiyama et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608828 | Balachandran | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614800 | Genty et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661422 | Valmiki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697376 | Son et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704310 | Zimmermann et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6765931 | Rabenko et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778168 | Mamiya et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6862606 | Major et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865188 | Stirling et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6873625 | Yoo et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6903716 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909442 | Hiyama et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914637 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6963968 | Kori | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973069 | Spear et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6975645 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7046631 | Giroux et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7075987 | Kim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7099277 | Sahinoglu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7136415 | Yun et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7177329 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194554 | Short et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7248590 | Liu | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7256790 | Valmiki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7295578 | Lyle et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7453479 | Le et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7525975 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20010030649 | Mamiya et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036193 | Kori | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038387 | Tomooka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007452 | Traw et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011996 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020060676 | Kim | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061024 | Malkemes et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062394 | Bunn et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071055 | Ooshima et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020071390 | Reeves et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075902 | Abbas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080468 | Crummey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085582 | Kim | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089517 | Ludtke et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122515 | Bodenschatz | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136219 | Ding et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149617 | Becker | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163598 | Pasqualino | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020164022 | Strasser et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184327 | Major et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190974 | Morita | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190978 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030035442 | Eng | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048852 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063077 | Koyama | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076282 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080971 | Hochmuth et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112822 | Hong et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145258 | Warner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149987 | Pasqualino et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152160 | Bauch et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174156 | Katsuhara et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174795 | Bruhnke et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177423 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212811 | Thornton | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049705 | Liebenow | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080671 | Siemens et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081151 | Greis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088469 | Levy | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103333 | Martwick et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114607 | Shay et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040198386 | Dupray | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203383 | Kelton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210805 | Kimelman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218598 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218599 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218624 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218625 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218627 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221056 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221180 | Enami et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221312 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221315 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228365 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233181 | Kobayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240454 | Yamauchi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243905 | Merritt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050062711 | Kobayashi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066085 | Kobayashi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050103333 | Bonutti | May 2005 | A1 |
20050225547 | Choi | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060036788 | Galang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059092 | Burshan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117371 | Margulis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060209890 | MacMullan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070049086 | Sakane | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097885 | Traversat et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140298 | Eng | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080175277 | Yin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080284761 | Knee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1353513 | Jun 2002 | CN |
0 354 480 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0 385 449 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 674 440 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 674 441 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0788048 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1 041 823 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 069 721 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1089503 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 154 354 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 229 690 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 251 664 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 432 203 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 473 700 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 517 292 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 519 349 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1 519 581 | Mar 2005 | EP |
2 329 741 | Mar 1999 | GB |
10145309 | May 1998 | JP |
11175045 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001218082 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001036900 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002304168 | Oct 2002 | JP |
110144 | Apr 2005 | SG |
WO 9500917 | Jan 1995 | WO |
9513681 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9841008 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9963513 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0020974 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0225822 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO0225885 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO02065746 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03058376 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03058376 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050062699 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60504060 | Sep 2003 | US | |
60562737 | Apr 2004 | US |